Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Khoja in Southern Kazakhstan: History and Identity

2013, 13th annual conference of European Society for Central Asian Studies

of the paper presented at the 13th annual ESCAS conference (Astana, Nazarbaev University), August 5, 2013.

Khoja in Southern Kazakhstan: History and Identity Azim Malikov Abstract of the paper presented at the 13th annual ESCAS conference (Astana, Nazarbaev University), August 5, 2013. Much of the research on ethnicity in Central Asia analyses the construction of imagined large-scale group boundaries, such as nations, regional groups etc. Meanwhile, the study of social groups, clans, lineages having imaginary or real common origins is also important for understanding the complex picture of identity (Schlee: 1994). Studying the Muslim religious elite of Central Asia is of a great importance from various perspectives: to trace the transformation of this group for the last 100 years, to reveal the role of political factors in the change of their identity, to investigate trans-ethnic communications of this group, to reveal strategy of marriages in respect of understanding of the general principle of inclusion and exclusion. Nowadays the Kazakhs and Uzbeks in Kazakhstan share distinct groups - Khojas some lineages of which occur in two or more of them. A field research was carried out in the Southern Kazakhstan province of Kazakhstan, using participant observation, and the collection of oral traditions and family stories. 1 I chose the Southern Kazakhstan region of Kazakhstan for an obvious reason: it was more Islamized than other regions and in the past there were many Khoja of various lineages and ethnic affiliation concentrated here. This paper addresses the core questions when, how and why do people identify themselves as Khojas and when and why not. I attempt to study not only Khoja identity expression but also the interplaying of multiple identities in the process of interaction of various groups. Kazakh-speaking Khojas of southern Kazakhstan consist of a number of groups with names that distinguish them from each other. The most numerous groups include Khorasan Khojas, the descendants of Sayyid-ata, Kylyshty Khojas and others (Muminov 2011). Uzbek-speaking Khojas are represented by the descendants of Khoja Ahmad Yassavi, Sayyid-ata, Muqim-ata and the descendants of various Islamic saints. Not all groups of Khojas have written genealogies, 1 I am grateful to the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (Halle/Saale, Germany) for scientific and financial support of my research many genealogical records were lost during the years of the Soviet power, the struggle against religion and atheistic propaganda (Privratsky 2004; Malikov 2013). After the collapse of the USSR, the Khojas began to restore shrines, held joint events, and intellectuals began to write the stories of various groups of Khoja, linking them with local history, the history of Kazakhstan and Islam. Some Khoja families maintain ties with the Khojas of Tashkent and the Bukhara region of Uzbekistan, where in particular the Khojas of the Khorasan group live (Malikov 2012). Despite the policy of nation-building in Kazakhstan, Khojas retain identity, which manifests itself in different ways depending on the situation and social interaction. References: Barth, Frederik. ‘Enduring and Emerging Issues in the Analysis of Ethnicity’, in: Hans Vermeulen and Cora Govers (eds), The Anthropology of Ethnicity. Beyond “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries”. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 1994, 11–3. DeWeese, Devin. ‘The Politics of Sacred Lineages in 19th Century Central Asia: Descent Groups linked to Khwaja Ahmad Yasavi in Shrine Documents and Genealogical Charters’, International Journal Middle Eastern Studies 31, 1999, 507–530. Donahoe, Brian, and Schlee, Günther. ‘Interethnic clan relationships in Asia and Africa’, in: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2002–2003. Halle (Saale): Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, 79–88. Malikov, Azim. Chodži doliny nižnego Zerafšana: istorija, identičnost', in: Religioznaja žizn narodov Central'noj Evrazii, Institut Ėtnologii i Antropologii RAN, 2012. pp. 176-189. Malikov, Azim. Khoja in Kazakhstan: identity transformations, in: CASCA: Centre for Anthropological Studies on Central Asia; framing the research, initial projects, 2013, 100-107. Muminov A.K. (pri uchastii Nurmanovoy A.SH., Sattarova S.) Rodoslovnoye drevo Mukhtara Auezova. Almaty: «Zhibek zholy», 2011. Privratsky, Bruce G. ‘‘Turkistan belongs to the Qojas’: Local Knowledge of a Muslim Tradition’, in Stephane A. Dudoignon (ed.), Devout Societies vs. Impious States? Transmiting Islamic Learning in Russia, Central Asia and China, through the 20th Century. Proceedings of an International Colloquium held in the Carre des Sciences, French Ministry of Research, Paris, November 12– 13, 2001. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 2004, 161–212. Schlee, Günther. Identities on the move: Clanship and pastoralism in Northern Kenya. Nairobi: Gideon S. Were Pr. 1994.