THE NEO-WOODLAND MOVEMENT
By Matthew Ryan Smith, PhD
That style of painting has been taken and worked and adopted by a number of very
talented image makers or other artists. They have always been very true to the ethos of
their community and that has been very difficult because it has been an art that has not
been primarily created for that community.
—Tom Hill (Konadaha Seneca), curator1
A
NDRÉ BRETON founded
Surrealism, Chuck Berry
shaped rock ’n’ roll, Allen
Ginsberg made Beat Poetry,
and Norval Morrisseau formed Woodland
Art. Though it was not conceived
in a vacuum, it remains one of few
original artistic movements to emerge
from Canada during the 20th century.
Morrisseau is recognized as the first
Indigenous artist to exhibit his work in a
contemporary Canadian art gallery and,
in doing so, he destabilized the historical
relationship whereby the mainstream art
world perceived Indigenous art as ethnographic craft. His was not a singular vision
but emerged as the result of Anishinaabe
cultural teachings, collaboration with
other image makers, and radical experimentation with totemic iconography.
1. “Transcript: Dreams, Myths, and Memories,” People Patterns, March 9, 1988, TVO video transcript, 28:54, web.
38 | FIRSTAMERICANARTMAGAZINE.COM
The Woodland style that Morrisseau
developed beginning in the 1950s has
since mushroomed into an expanded
field of Woodland-related art occasionally
referred to as Neo-Woodland or New
Woodland style. However, little has
been written regarding its etymology
or its complicated relationship to
secular themes, digital technology, or
21st-century life. In some ways, the
Neo-Woodland art typifies a continuum
of the original Woodland movement
elucidated by Morrisseau while, in other
ways, it breaks off into new directions and
unforeseen lines of flight.
EMERGENCE
OJIBWE IS BELIEVED to derive from
the word Ozhibii’iweg, which translates to
English as “people who keep records of a
vision.” Their visual material and other
iconography, including totemic symbols,
ochre petroglyphs, dreamscapes, personal
signatures, and writing,2 were inscribed
on birchbark scrolls by members of the
Midewiwin, the Grand Medicine Society.
Research indicates that this pictographic
visual system was one of the largest
and most widely used in the Eastern
Woodlands. Certain scrolls are imbued
with spiritual meaning and engaged
during ceremony by the initiated, hence
their imagery and subject matter are
protected by strict cultural protocols.
Morrisseau was born in 1932 on
Bingwi Neyaashi Anishinaabek First
Nation, a small Anishinaabe reserve
community in northwest Ontario. As
a young man, he was introduced to
birchbark scrolls and oral teachings by
his maternal grandfather, the spiritual
leader Moses Potan Nanakonagos, and
Morrisseau sought to imitate its iconography and worldview in paintings and
drawings. Anishinaabe cultural protocols
led community members to dissuade
him from sharing their ceremonial
knowledge with others. 3 Morrisseau
continued unabated, notwithstanding the
social taboo, and he experimented with a
visual language that later became known
as Woodland Art, Legend Painting, or
X-Ray Art.
With the support of friends and
sycophants, an exhibition of Morrisseau’s work opened at Pollock Gallery in
Toronto in 1962. Not only did this critical
event establish Morrisseau’s commercial
success, but it also introduced Anishinaabe visual culture to mainstream
Canadian audiences. Several years later,
in 1973, the Professional Native Indian
Artists Inc. (PNIAI), of which Morrisseau
was a founding member, reinforced the
idea that art produced by Indigenous
artists was utterly of its time and existed
outside the discursive restrictions placed
on it by ethnological museums, the gallery
system, and the souvenir economy. At this
time, Odawa/Potawatomi painter Daphne
Odjig (1919–2016) said, “We wanted just
to be artists.”4
During the early 1960s, Morrisseau
started to tighten his compositions and
apply paint more liberally to delineate
large blocks of color enveloped by thick
black lines. Flat planes of luminescent
white paint and undulating thin black
contours vibrate and tremble his tableaux
to life. Inside the transparent bodies of
sacred beings such as thunderbirds, water
serpents, and snakes are repeated patterns
and designs that generate X-ray-like
vision, which unsettle the observer’s
sense of perception, making it difficult to
a b ov e
Stephen Snake
(Rama Chippewa), Copper
Thunderbird, 2008, oil on
canvas, 40 × 30 in. Image
courtesy of the artist.
opposite Norval Morrisseau
(Bingwi Neyaashi Ojibwe,
1 93 1 – 2 0 07 ) , S h a m a n a n d
Apprentice, ca. 1980–85, acrylic
on canvas, 53¼ × 74½ in.,
collection of the Art Gallery of
Hamilton, gift of Nicholas John
Pustina, Robert Edward Zelinski,
and Kenny Alwyn Whent, 1985.
Image courtesy of the Art
Gallery of Hamilton, Ontario.
2. Christopher Barry-Arredondo, “The ‘talking paper’: Interpreting the birch-bark scrolls of the Ojibwa
Midewiwin” (master’s thesis, SUNY Buffalo, 2006).
3. Carmen Robertson, “Norval Morrisseau: Life and Work: Biography,” Art Institute Canada, web.
4. Catherine Mattes, “Goyce & Joshim Kakegamic,” Gallery One One One, web.
NO. 30, SPRING 2021 | 39
above Thomas Jay Bruyere
(Cree/Ojibwe), Deer, 2020,
digitally-colored ink drawing.
Image courtesy of the artist.
opposite Thomas Jay Bruyere
(Cree/Ojibwe), Amy's
Pedagogy, 2020, digitallycolored ink drawing. Image
courtesy of the artist.
distinguish a strong relationship between
figures and the ground.
The appearance of orbs featuring
a diametric line through their center,
a divided circle, may represent moral
binaries, in addition to reverse states of
life and death, day and night, function
and dysfunction. The spheres link to other
figures and forms using thin black lines
to propose a metaphorical relationship
and express the worldview that all things
are interconnected, both here and in
the cosmos. “All life is connected,” said
artist Roy Thomas (Long Lake Ojibwe,
1949–2004), “the artist to the brush,
the brush to the creatures and the trees,
the paint to the earth, the canvas to the
plants.”5 Their strange resemblance to
cells or microorganisms insinuates that
Indigenous medicine identified the
strange networks between matter we
cannot see with our eyes long before the
microscope existed.
Morrisseau was drawn to the
spiritual beliefs of the Anishinaabeg
and Christendom early in his career, the
latter’s dogma imprinted on him while
surviving residential school from the
age of six. During the mid-1970s, he was
introduced to the American religious
movement Eckankar and, in particular, its
theorization of astral projection. An astral
plane is a state of existence or different
form of reality that an individual’s
consciousness or spirit can travel to in life
or death. Greg A. Hill (Kanyen'kehà:ka
Mohawk), National Gallery of Canada
curator, maintains that Eckankar was a
deep influence for Morrisseau because it
helped him develop the visual language
for his spiritual beliefs6 and inspired such
paintings as Artist and Shaman Between
Two Worlds (1980) and Observations of
the Astral World (ca. 1994).
Morrisseau’s imagery portrays
astral planes to which he, as a spiritual
practitioner, transcended. Morrisseau’s
interest in traversing other realities reflects
Eckankar’s core beliefs in the existence
of divine light and the healing power of
color. “Many times people tell me that
I’ve cured them of something, whatever’s
ailing them,” Morrisseau remarked. “It was
the colour of the painting that did that.”7
Still, Morrisseau’s impassioned application
of complementary colors intensified by
tertiary colors is precisely why paintings
like The Masterpiece (1982) are diffused
with energy. His testing of light and color
combinations to imbue sacred legends
and pictographic imagery with great élan
impacted those who came after.
The diffusion of Woodland art
in the South coincides with a zenith of
Indigenous political activism in the late
1960s and ’70s. At this time, the federal
government penned sweeping policy
changes to repeal the special status
given Indigenous peoples by the state
5. “Campus Art Guide: Roy Thomas,” University of Regina, 2016, web.
6. Robertson, “Norval Morrisseau,” web.
7. Norval Morrisseau and Donald Robinson, Travels to the House of Invention (Toronto: Key Porter Books, 1997),
16–17.
40 | FIRSTAMERICANARTMAGAZINE.COM
and fully assimilate them into broader
Canadian society, only a few years
after they received the right to vote in
federal elections. Morrisseau was almost
certainly perceived as an intermediary
between the Northern communities and
its Southern counterparts. So, was he
used by authorities to stabilize decaying
relations? Since then, Woodland art has
become an indelible facet of Canadian
identity, though presumably many
Woodland artists would not consider
themselves “Canadian” at all.
BRIDGE
MANY ARTISTS OF THE SECOND
GENERATION of Woodland artists,
sometimes described as the New
Woodland School, were directly
mentored by Morrisseau or were students
of his work and teachings. Though his
influence is often overlooked today,
likely due to his death at the early age
of 35, the extraordinary body of work
left behind by Morrisseau’s apprentice
and friend Carl Ray (Sandy Lake Cree,
1943–1979) was viewed as a seminal
“bridge between Morrisseau and the new
generation of Native painters” as early as
1984.8 Other artists such as Brian Marion
(Saulteaux, 1960–2011), Richard Bedwash
(Long Lake Ojibwe), Stephen Snake
(Rama Chippewa), and Abe Kakepetum
(Sandy Lake Oji-Cree, 1944–2019)
similarly adopted the lexical system of
the Woodland style and its symbology to
map new trajectories.
Comparable to Ray, painter
Roy Thomas also helped bridge the
Woodland style to later generations
of artists. Thomas was born on the
trapline outside Caramat, Ontario, and
grew up on the Long Lake #58 Reserve
community. His grandmother shared
stories of Anishinaabe heroes, immortals,
and animals with him as he traced their
likeness on her back with his finger,9 and
he was fascinated by the pictographic
imagery he encountered throughout
northwestern Ontario. Like Morrisseau,
Thomas periodically painted on birchbark
as a reference to Anishinaabe ceremony
and depicted totem animals in luminous
colors united by undulating black lines.
His 1984 painting We’re All in the
Same Boat (1984), included in the Art
Gallery of Ontario’s exhibition Norval
Morrisseau and the Emergence of the
Image Makers, references the genesis
of the Woodland style and its principal
authors. The painting depicts a canoe
holding seven artists participating in
the exhibition—Morrisseau, Odjig,
Ray, Joshim Kakegamic (Sandy Lake
Oji-Cree, 1952–1993), Saul Williams
(North Caribou Lake Oji-Cree), Blake
Debassige (M'Chigeeng Ojibwe), and
Thomas himself—as they gesture toward
pictographs with their paint brushes. The
work stands in praise of Anishinaabe
visual culture and pays homage to the
Woodland artists while also pointing
to the challenges each experienced in
legitimizing their new art form to the
contemporary art market.
The critical success of Woodland art
is due, in part, to the self-determination
of Sandy Lake First Nation artists Goyce
and Joshim Kakegamic during the 1970s
and early ’80s. Morrisseau married their
sister, Harriet Kakegamic (Oji-Cree),
in the late 1950s and encouraged the
then-teenage boys to paint and draw in
the Woodland style he advocated. It was
around this time that Goyce remembers,
“I started to establish myself … as an
Indian artist. Pardon me, establish myself
as an artist who happens to be Indian.”10
The 1970s saw the Kakegamic brothers
travel to Toronto where they sold original
paintings to a buyer who cheated them out
of artist and copyright fees. Nonetheless,
they absorbed the newest printmaking
techniques at Toronto’s Open Studio, an
artist-run center, before returning home.
The brothers settled in Red Lake,
Ontario, and opened Triple K Cooperative Inc. with their brother Henry and
became the first Indigenous silkscreen
printing company in Canada. In short,
Triple K reproduced and promoted limited-edition works on paper by the brothers
themselves, as well as that of friends and
colleagues like Barry Peters (Pikangikum
Ojibwe), Paddy Peters (Pikangikum
Ojibwe), Williams, and Morrisseau. The
efforts of the Kakegamic brothers to
retain their agency over how their work
was represented to collectors, dealers, and
galleries, often through copyright and
royalty agreements, became a model for
other Indigenous-led art organizations.
The access and affordability of Triple K
prints to patrons throughout northern
North America and Europe helped proliferate the Woodland style among younger
artists and collectors.
8. Alan J. Ryan, review of Norval Morrisseau and the Emergence of the Image Makers, by Elizabeth McLuhan and Tom Hill, The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 4, no. 1
(1984), 162.
9. Stephanie MacLellan, “Influential Native artist Roy Thomas dies,” The Chronicle-Journal, November 15, 2004, web.
10. Cathy Mattes, “Indigenous Artists Defying Expectations,” Canadian Dimension, January 12, 2007, web.
NO. 30, SPRING 2021 | 41
The establishment of the Ojibwe
Cultural Foundation (OCF) in M'Chigeeng First Nation on Manitoulin Island
three years later helped to differentiate
the aesthetic interests and conceptual
approaches between the Woodland
artists and what became known as
the Manitoulin School. Artists Shirley
Cheechoo (Cree), Blake Debassige,
Leland Bell (Wikwemikong Ojibwe/
Odawa), Joseph Linklater (Anishinaabe),
Randy Trudeau (Curve Lake Ojibwe/
Odawa), and Martin Panamick (M'Chigeeng Ojibwe, 1956–1997) were soon
associated with the Manitoulin group
and further distinguished themselves
from the original movement through
their transdisciplinary approach towards
art making.
Cheechoo, in particular, produced
a number of paintings and drawings
informed by poetry, narrative fiction,
music, film, and theater. If creativity
necessitates experimentation, then those
of the Manitoulin School splintered from
the Woodland style by embracing new
directions. Alan Ojiig Corbiere (M'Chigeeng Ojibwe), former OCF director,
and Leland Bell maintain that the work
produced by the Manitoulin School
remains heterogeneous in its approach
and application. 11 The Anishinaabeg
“come from a long line of creativity; our
civilization goes way back,” says Bell,
“What we practice is creativity.”12
NEO-WOODLAND
above, top Chief Lady Bird
(Rama Chippewa/Potawatomi),
Dibaajimowinan, Mushkiikii,
and Land Back, 2020, digital
illustration and collage. Image
courtesy of the artist.
above, bottom Patrick Hunter,
Howling for the Northstar, 2014,
acrylic on canvas, 16 × 20 in.
Image courtesy of the artist
opposite Chief Lady Bird (Rama
Chippewa/Potawatomi), Bneshii
Devours Windigo, Creates New
World, 2021, oil on panel, 30 × 23
in. Image courtesy of the artist.
42 | FIRSTAMERICANARTMAGAZINE.COM
Elsewhere, in 1971 the Manitoulin
Arts Foundation on Manitoulin Island,
Ontario, received funding to organize
studio classes for emerging artists taught
by instructors such as Morrisseau, Odjig,
and Ray.
THE NEO-WOODLAND STYLE
acknowledges the historical influences
of Morrisseau and Woodland art while
evolving its themes and subject matter
into secular and digital expressions. No
longer are astral projection, petroglyphic
engravings, or pictographic imagery
central facets of image-making, but a line
of continuity to work that aestheticizes
current political obstacles and vernacular
life. For curator Bruce Bernstein,
“Tradition is not a stagnant set of rules
and practices but rather a set of principles
11. Lynn Barwin, Marjory Shawande, Eric Crighton, and Luisa Veronis, “Methods-in-Place: ‘Art Voice’ as a
Locally and Culturally Relevant Method to Study Traditional Medicine Programs in Manitoulin Island,
Ontario, Canada,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14, no. 5 (December 27, 2015), web.
12. Margo Little, Portraits of Spirit Island: The Manitoulin School of Art Comes of Age (Gore Bay, ON: Lady Luck
Enterprises, 2009), 28.
13. Bruce Bernstein, “Expected Evolution: The Changing Continuum,” in Shapeshifting: Transformations in
Native American Art, ed. Karen Kramer Russell (Salem: Peabody Essex Museum, 2012), 30–43.
and values that provide a foundation for
change—a wonderful and vital part of
art-making.”13 Many Anishinaabe artists
still champion the elemental tableaux of
1970s and ’80s Woodland art in their use
of exoskeletal designs, repeated patterns,
lustrous color palettes, heavy black line,
and all-over composition. Other artists
feel attached to Woodland art, because
it maps a connection to ancestral
knowledge, grounds them in a specific
place, and therefore provides a strong
sense of belonging.
The earliest memories of Cree/
Ojibwe artist Thomas Jay Bruyere were
replicating prints by Odjig and Jackson
Beardy (Garden Hill Oji-Cree, 1944–1984)
that hung on the walls of his family home.
Beardy, especially, made a lasting impact
on Bruyere, because the younger artist
attended school, where they were the only
Indigenous children, with Beardy’s son
Jason. Later, Bruyere attended the School
of Art at the University of Manitoba, the
same school that Beardy graduated from
decades earlier in 1966. In Bruyere’s
painting Deer (2020), flora and fauna
converge in a fantastical vista animated
by complementary colors. Unlike the
original Woodland movement, black
line is used sparingly and blocks of color
are not flat but feature gradients of red
to orange and purple to blue. Wavy black
lines of the Woodland style are inverted
to delicate white lines that extend through
the deer’s neck and swell into its head.
Bruyere’s approach to painting is rooted
in “Indigenous Storytelling” and autobiography,14 whereby cultural narratives
and lived history synthesize to generate
fantastical visions.
Conversely, for some Anishinaabeg, the archetypal shift in themes
and subject matter in the Woodland
style represents cultural loss; more
specifically, the erasure of Indigenous
peoples through Canada’s assimilationist policies. Odjig, for example, was
a fluent speaker of her original language
until she left the Wikwemikong First
Nation on Manitoulin Island after the
death of her mother and grandfather.15
Marten Falls Ojibway knowledge-keeper
Eli Baxter writes that the Anishinaabe
Kih-kayn-daa-soh-win (knowledge)
and Pah-git-tin-nih-gay-win-nun (laws)
are encoded in the original language
itself. This includes information on the
education system, sciences, philosophy,
spiritual teachings, and so forth. As
a consequence, he considers that the
loss of Anishinaabemowin (the Ojibwe
language) from settler-colonialism and its
aftermaths might have shifted Woodland
art from its foundations in spirituality and
ceremony to secular and autobiographical
experiences.16
Rama Chippewa and Moose Deer
Point Potawatomi artist Chief Lady Bird
makes clear that the concepts articulated through the Woodland style are
indeed related to language in that they
circumvent the “English language and
colonial worldview,” functioning as “a
portal into known and unknown worlds,
bursting with ideologies that place us
on the land and express the interconnectedness embedded in Anishinaabe
cosmologies.” 17 Paintings such as
Bneshii Devours Windigo, Creates New
World (2021) are deeply indebted to
the Woodland style for it makes use of
totemic iconography, blocks of pure
color, and rhythmic black line against
14. Bernstein, “Expected Evolution,” 30–43.
15. Judy Stoffman, “Aboriginal modernist painter Daphne Odjig led Indian Group of Seven,” Globe and Mail, October 21, 2016, web.
16. Eli Baxter, email message to author, January 25, 2021). See also: Eli Baxter, Aki-Wayn-Zih: A Person as Worthy as the Earth, ed. Matthew Ryan Smith (Montreal: McGillQueen’s University Press, forthcoming).
17. Chief Lady Bird, email message to author, January 31, 2021.
NO. 30, SPRING 2021 | 43
above Gordon Coons (Lac
Courte Oreilles Ojibwe/Ottawa),
Caring for Our Relations, 2014,
acrylic on canvas, 30 × 24 in.
Image courtesy of the artist.
opposite Gordon Coons (Lac
Courte Oreilles Ojibwe/Ottawa),
Ancient Trials of the Sturgeons,
2015, acrylic on canvas, 24 × 30
in. Image courtesy of the artist.
a brilliant firetruck-red background
utilized by the likes of Thomas, Alex
Janvier (Denesuline/Saulteaux), and Jim
Oskineegish (Eabametoong Ojibwe). Her
other works such as Dibaajimowinan,
Mushkiikii, and Land Back (2020)
introduce collage elements, photography, and digital design into established
Woodland motifs. The background image
is Lady Bird’s self-portrait adorned with
red ochre pictographs on her face. The
words Land Back hang from her earrings
and combine with sacred birds, soft flora,
and syllabics to communicate Indigenous
stewardship of the land and the process
of reclamation. Hers is a memorable
statement that conceptualizes “the
experience of living as an Anishinaabe
kwe in this complex time/timeline.”18 It
is both of its time and of another time,
impelled by the Woodland style while
renewing it in the ether of digital software.
Patrick Hunter is a two-Spirit Red
Lake Ojibwe artist and designer who,
like Chief Lady Bird, is also interested
in the aesthetic potential of digitalizing
the Woodland style. Hunter grew up with
Woodland art and prints on the walls
of his home and remembers hearing
anecdotes about some of the men who
originated the Woodland movement.
“I think it's important to see the works
of those early originators,” says Hunter,
“and put it through your own filter and
experiences and turn it into something
that looks true to you, and that's what I
hope I've done.”19 Though his paintings
reside in public and private art collections, his design work has garnered
significant commercial interest in recent
years. Hunter draws inspiration from
bandolier bags and historical clothing,
which splinters the Woodland style into
new domains of contemporary fashion
and graphic illustration.
Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa/Ottawa
artist Gordon Coons looks to his Anishinaabe heritage to interpret the wildlife
and natural scenery that he absorbs in the
Great Lakes region. There is a jouissance,
a playfulness, that exists in paintings
that bring together Western and Indigenous cultural elements. For example,
in Caring for Our Relations (2020), he
envelops common animals from the
Great Lakes—a cardinal, turtle, swan,
and rabbit—inside the connective tissue
of bright green line. It is not a coincidence
that the back of a badger is rendered in
white stars on a blue background to hint
that American colonialism and Indigenous history is interwoven into a shared
condition. To this end, Coons warns that
the Woodland style has been corrupted
by unscrupulous actors in recent years.
“With the new Woodland Art Style
creations,” he affirms, “traditional stories
can be seen […] but has some of the
spirituality been lost? Or has it been lost
because of the need to chase the dollar?”20
Woodland art, much like Inuit
carving, has been produced for the
18. Chief Lady Bird, email.
19. Patrick Hunter, email message to author, January 25, 2021.
20. Gordon Coons, email message to author, January 25, 2021.
44 | FIRSTAMERICANARTMAGAZINE.COM
souvenir economy en masse for publics
with little knowledge or regard for its
cultural origins or spiritual cosmology.
Airports, corner stores, trinket shops,
and even some art galleries sell kitschy
Woodland coffee mugs, T-shirts, neckties,
and mousepads, some with or without
the artists’ permission. Likewise, a
Toronto exhibition of non-Indigenous
artist Amanda PL was canceled due to
public outcry over her paintings that
unabashedly replicate the Woodland
style. Chippewa of the Thames artist Jay
Soule contends that “she’s taking [Morrisseau’s] stories and retelling them, which
bastardizes it down the road.” Amanda
Pl responds to the controversy by saying,
“I think it’s a shame to say that an artist
can’t create something because they’re
not from that race.”21 Non-Native people
profiteering off Indigenous art is nothing
new, though the deliberation surrounding
cultural appropriation is still unfolding.
Nevertheless, it remains an important
part of Woodland art’s story.
In a similar vein, the documentary
There Are No Fakes (2019) reveals an
alleged forgery network in Thunder
Bay, Ontario, of approximately 3,000
Morrisseau paintings at an estimated
worth of Can$30,000,000. It maps how
protagonist and musician Kevin Hearn
purchased a (supposed) Morrisseau
painting (with suspicious provenance)
for $20,000 and included it in a private
collector’s exhibition at the Art Gallery
of Ontario where it was swiftly removed
by then-curator Gerald McMaster (Plains
Cree). After the film’s release, an Ontario
Court of Appeals decision overturned an
original decision against Hearn to award
him $60,000. If the purported emulation
of Morrisseau’s paintings is true, then it
would have generated millions of dollars
in sales for some while jeopardizing the
value and provenance for others.
Back in 1935, Walter Benjamin
argued that mechanical processes such
as lithography or photography deplete art
of its special quality, what he called its
“aura.”22 If the alleged forgery network is
factory-like in its production, then what
is the cost to Morrisseau and his legacy?
Is this what Coons insinuates when
he asserts that the dollar of greed has
supplanted the spirit of Woodland art.
In the end, perhaps the greater shame is
that discourse surrounding forgeries and
plagiarism have surpassed critical debate
on Morrisseau’s invaluable body of work
and his conceptualization of Woodland
art itself.
CONCLUSION
THE WOOD LAND SCHOOL originated in 2011 when Omaskêko Cree
artist Duane Linklater curated a small
exhibition of works from five friends and
collaborators in his second-floor studio
in Nipissing First Nation, Ontario. “By
creating a small space between wood and
land,” Linklater “sought to break apart the
ethnographic categorization of Eastern
Indigenous people in North America.”
Since then, the Wood Land School has
evolved into an elastic arts-based project
with no fixed address that scrutinizes
the spectrum of Indigenous inclusivity
in institutional spaces. At issue are the
limits of visual art when the presence of
Indigenous voices and their conceptualizations are inserted into their directives.23
Here, in the hands of its membership,
the etymology of Woodland to “Wood
Land” offers a productive and meaningful
schema to critique unbalanced systems
of display. For this reason, it is firmly
bonded to the oppositional politics
adopted by the PNIAI and the first generation of Woodland artists.
The image-making of Morrisseau
and the transfigurations of Woodland art
diffuse in unpredictable ways whereby
attempting to classify the movement
risks essentializing it. What is clear is that
Woodland art was an archetypal event in
art’s befuddled history and a crucial point
of departure for a breadth of aesthetic,
economic, and political exploration (or
exploitation). Neo-Woodland art, in all its
various manifestations and guises, can be
many things to many people—beautiful,
regenerative, or utterly corrupt.
Matthew Ryan Smith, PhD, is the curator and head of collections at Glenhyrst Art
Gallery in Brantford, Ontario.
21. Shanifa Nasser, “Toronto gallery cancels show after concerns artist ‘bastardizes’ Indigenous art,” CBC News, April 28, 2017, web.
22. Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” in Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn from the 1935 essay (New York:
Schocken Books, 1968), 217–51.
23. Aïcha Diallo, “Centering Indigenous Bodies, Art and Practice,” artseverwhere, September 25, 2017, web.
NO. 30, SPRING 2021 | 45