Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Analyzing Freud: Letters of HD, Bryher and Their Circle

2004

Analyzing Freud presents select correspondence between Sigmund Freud and modernist visionary poet H.D. (Hilda Doolittle), her partner-patron Bryher (Winnifred Ellerman), and their circle of artists, psychoanalysts, and psychoanalytic enthusiasts. Susan Stanford Friedman, an accomplished modernist and feminist scholar, has written two books on HD: Psyche Reborn: The Emergence of H.D.

Analyzing Freud: Letters of H.D., Bryher, and Their Circle. Edited by Susan Stanford Friedman. New York: New Directions Press, 2002. Reviewed by Dianne Chisholm, Professor of English, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Analyzing Freud presents select correspondence between Sigmund Freud and modernist visionary poet H.D. (Hilda Doolittle), her partner-patron Bryher (Winnifred Ellerman), and their circle of artists, psychoanalysts, and psychoanalytic enthusiasts. Susan Stanford Friedman, an accomplished modernist and feminist scholar, has written two books on HD: Psyche Reborn: The Emergence of H.D. (1981, 1987) and Penelope’s Web: Gender, Modernity, H.D.’s Fiction (1990). The former recovers H.D. from the cultural crypt where she had been buried by a canonical criticism fixated on Ezra Pound as phallogocentric genius of modernism’s literary vortex. The H.D. who (re)emerges in Friedman’s archeology is a powerful self-production that weaves poetic personae from an esoteric knit of Freudianism and hermeticism. If H.D.’s “Freud” cannot be extricated from her artistic imaginary (a heterological encoding of occultism, Hellenism, romanticism, and Moravianism), her artistic imaginary, especially in the latter, most prodigious-epic-phase of her writing, derives from a real encounter with Freud–two series of analysis held in Vienna, March 1-June 15, 1933 and October 29-December 2, 1934. Analyzing Freud returns to the scene of analysis, where H.D. works through repressed trauma that blocked her creative flow. Drawing on letters to and from H.D. at the time, including between sessions and several years following-up, Friedman captures H.D. in the act of assimilating and transforming analytic dialogue in(to) a language of psychic revelation and everyday communication. Freud’s own voice is heard in his twenty-four letters to H.D. (nine of which appear in her Tribute to Freud, 1956) and in his nineteen letters to Bryher (all previously unpublished). Inserted amongst H.D.’s correspondents, Freud seems to speak well-removed from institutional authority as if from another scene (or séance) where rules of practice are broken and symbolic gifts between analyst and analysand are exchanged. H.D.’s letters invoke Freud less as master analyst than psychic mentor and collaborator. A familial subject of speculation between H.D. and Bryher, (Bryher arranged and paid for H.D.’s sessions and was preparing with Freud to become an analyst herself), he becomes wise, old “Papa,” whose riddling signs of desire (for love, for recognition), fear (for civilization, for patriarchy) and wonder (of the occult, the uncanny, the archaic) invite their co-interpretation. Hence the title: “Analyzing Freud.” As Friedman underscores, H.D.’s Vienna letters “are not ‘literary’” but “thankfully” spontaneous, immediate, intimate, and replete with the suspense of an endpoint unknown. Written not for posterity but to express and absorb the living moment of analysis–the uncanny now-time of latent selfdiscovery–and to report flashes of awakening as transpire in process, they are “unique among all the accounts of analysis with Freud.” H.D.’s invoking of psychoanalytic concepts and extemporary theorizing signal not the homework of a patient but the rehearsal of an initiate. Moreover, her letters offer close-up glimpses into Freud’s practice, literally into the office of his home at Berggasse 19, the most interior space of his inner sanctum (though HD was not part of Freud’s circle she thought of herself as a psychic insider). In contrast, Freud’s neatly handwritten letters to H.D., mostly in German, are fastidiously professional, with precisely measured tones of affection and regard. In themselves, they reveal little. Set beside letters from H.D. and Bryher, they evidence his skill at economizing their exchange, at giving sufficient attention to inspire trust, faith, respect, esteem, familiarity without soliciting deference or indebtedness. Having none of H.D.’s letters to Freud (Freud’s letters to H.D. survived the bombings of London but hers to him were lost in his flight from Berlin) and despite impeccable editorial assistance, we can only hypothesize the transferential character of their dialogue. The formality, brevity, and infrequency of Freud’s letters balance oddly against the copious, almost daily circulation of H.D.’s letters written in “free association” to Bryher. We are thus prompted to query, not whether Freud mastered the counter-transference but whether transference occurred at all, H.D.’s session-to-session mindfulness having been so heavily mediated by the H.D.-Bryher relay. One of the most striking features of this correspondence is its view onto Freud’s larger, political and historical setting. H.D.’s letters from Vienna detail objects of mass phantasy and collective anxiety, observed en passant from the cinema to the coffee house and from the military barricade to the opera with an awareness that reflects how much psychoanalysis was “in the air” as a method of cultural self- reflection, vital in its capacity to rethink and resist fascism and war. In turn, we regard psychoanalysis and Freud “in situ,” affected by social upheaval that cannot be explained away by orthodox science. We witness how external turbulence frames H.D.’s interior stage of confrontation with her repressed terrors of WWI, terrors which analysis and writing eventually liberate and channel into war poetry. Friedman’s astutely focused and deftly orchestrated editing foregrounds the two-way street of analytic traffic inside and outside Freud’s practice, even if it is only H.D. we see transforming and transformed by that exchange.