1
2
Quantity and quality of organic matter (detritus) drives N2 effluxes (net denitrification) across
3
seasons, benthic habitats and estuaries
4
5
6
7
8
9
Bradley D. Eyre*, Damien T. Maher, Peter Squire
10
11
Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480,
12
Australia
13
14
*
Corresponding author:
[email protected]
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Running head: Organic matter driven denitrification
22
23
Abstract
N2 flux rates (net denitrification) were measured over a diel cycle, seasonally, in twelve
24
benthic habitats across three warm temperate Australian coastal systems. Dark N2-N fluxes were
25
strongly controlled by sediment oxygen demand (SOD) across the three estuaries, four seasons and
26
twelve benthic habitats (r2 = 0.743; p<0.001; n=142; slope = 0.0170). However, some of the slopes
27
differed significantly between seasons, and among estuaries and habitats and all of the slopes were
28
correlated with the δ13C values and C:N ratios of sediment organic matter. Ternary mixing diagrams
29
with the contribution of algal, seagrass and terrestrial/ mangrove material to sediment organic
30
matter showed that habitats, seasons and estuaries dominated by a mixture of seagrass and algal
31
material had the lowest slopes, and slopes increase as habitats, seasons and estuaries have an
32
increasing contribution from terrestrial/ mangrove material. Overall, the slopes of dark N2 fluxes
33
versus SOD were low compared to previous studies, most likely due to either, or a combination of,
34
the C:N ratio of the organic matter, the mixture of C:N ratios making up the organic matter, the
35
structure of the organic matter, and/or the SOD rates. This study demonstrated that it is not just the
36
quantity, but also the type (quality), and maybe the mixture, of organic matter that is an important
37
control on denitrification. As such, rapid global changes to detrital sources to coastal systems due to
38
losses of mangrove, seagrasses and salt-marshes, and associated increases in algae and
39
macrophytes, are also expected to impact system level losses of nitrogen via denitrification.
40
2
41
42
1.0 Introduction
Global change is rapidly altering the type, and function, of primary producers in coastal
43
ecosystems. Mangroves, seagrasses and salt-marshes have declined by around 30 to 50% over the
44
past few decades due to reclamation, deforestation and urbanisation (reviewed in Mcleod et al.,
45
2011). Over the same period there has been a large increase in phytoplankton and ephemeral
46
macrophyte production (eutrophication) in many coastal systems due to nutrient over-enrichment
47
(Cloern, 2001; McGlathery et al., 2007), and an associated increase in the ratio of pelagic to benthic
48
production (Borum and Sand-Jensen, 1996; Ferguson and Eyre, 2010). The phenology of
49
phytoplankton blooms, and associated quality of phytodetritus, has been altered due to climate
50
changes (e.g. Nixon et al., 2009). Combined these changes in primary producers will significantly
51
effect the quantity, and quality, of non-living (detrital) organic matter in coastal systems, which in-
52
turn impacts ecosystem structure and function (Kelaher et al., 2013). However, it is not fully
53
understand how these changes in detrital resources influence key ecosystem processes such as
54
denitrification.
55
56
Denitrification is a critical ecosystem process that permanently removes nitrogen from an
57
ecosystem by converting fixed nitrogen to di-nitrogen gas, which can then be lost to the
58
atmosphere. Nitrogen lost to the atmosphere as di-nitrogen gas acts as a control on system level
59
primary productivity. The considered importance of denitrification is demonstrated by the
60
numerous denitrification studies in most ecosystems (Seitzinger et al., 2006). These studies have
61
identified several primary factors that control denitrification, including the supply of labile organic
62
matter and nitrate, bottom water oxygen concentrations, and several secondary factors such as the
63
presence or absence of macrofauna, macrophytes, benthic microalgae, H2S and FeS (Cornwell et
64
al., 1999; Canfield et al., 2005). In sediments where the overlying water is well-oxygenated and has
65
low nitrate concentrations, a supply of labile carbon is probably the most important controlling
66
factor on denitrification. As such, the carbon and nitrogen cycles of costal ecosystems are closely
3
67
linked via denitrification, which requires a source of organic matter (detritus) to proceed, but can
68
limit the production of organic matter via nitrogen removal.
69
70
Although many studies have looked at the effect of changes in organic matter on benthic
71
denitrification in coastal systems, these have mostly focused on organic matter quantity, not quality,
72
in response to understanding the effects of the deposition of excess organic matter production
73
(phyto-detritus) to the sediments due to nutrient over-enrichment. For example, several
74
experimental studies have shown that denitrification is enhanced when low C:N organic matter (e.g.
75
phytoplankton, glucose or yeast) is added to sediments (Brettar et al., 1992; Caffrey et al., 1993;
76
Fulweiler et al., 2008; Fulweiler et al., 2013), although coupled nitrification-denitrification, and
77
associated denitrification efficiency, can be reduced (Caffrey et al., 1993; Eyre and Ferguson,
78
2009), and Banks et al., (2013) found no response in benthic denitrification to added low C:N
79
organic matter in sediments already enriched in organic matter. Several studies have also identified
80
a positively linear relationship between dark rates of benthic denitrification and sediment oxygen
81
demand (SOD) (a proxy for the quantity of organic matter oxidation) (Table 1). Seitzinger and
82
Giblin (1996) found a slope of 0.116 for a compilation of benthic denitrification rates and SOD for
83
continental shelf sediments where the source organic matter was low C:N phyto-detritus. Similarly,
84
flow-through reactor experiments using permeable carbonate sands and seawater, with
85
phytoplankton as the organic matter source, had a SOD versus dark N2 efflux slope of 0.114 (Santos
86
et al., 2012). Organic matter oxidation would increase the supply of NH4+ from ammonification for
87
coupled nitrification–denitrification, increase the availability of electron donors for denitrification,
88
and modify the sediment redox conditions.
89
90
Much less is known about the effect of organic matter quality on benthic denitrification in
91
coastal systems. The only experimental study to compare additions of organic matter of different
92
quality on benthic denitrification rates found that high C:N organic matter added to fine muddy
4
93
sands in a temperate climate suppressed denitrification, most likely due to competition for nitrogen
94
by heterotrophs processing the refractory organic matter (Oakes et al., 2011). Similarly, Fulweiler et
95
al. (2013) speculated that the decrease in benthic denitrification during a 214 day long mesocosm
96
experiment was due to the organic matter becoming more refractory (high C:N) resulting in an
97
increased competition for nitrogen. These conditions would have been an advantage to sulphate
98
reducers that fix their own nitrogen and may also suppress nitrification, both of which would
99
decrease N2 effluxes (Fulweiler et al., 2013). Nitrate uptake in the dark (inferred to be
100
denitrification) following additions of low and high C:N organic matter to marine sediments found
101
that the magnitude of the uptake was not related to the C:N ratio, but was related to the lability
102
(structure) of the organic mater (Dahllof and Karle, 2005).
103
104
A number of previous studies in coastal systems have looked at SOD versus dark N2 efflux
105
slopes. The effect of high C:N organic matter on denitrification rates can be seen in SOD versus
106
dark N2 efflux slopes in the experiment of Oakes et al. (2011), which were 0.129 for low C:N (7.2)
107
organic matter (phyto-detritus) and 0.022 for high C:N (28.2) organic matter. A compilation of 657
108
measurements of denitrification and SOD from a range of aquatic systems found a slope of 0.086
109
(Table 1) and suggested that the lower slope than that identified by Seitzinger and Giblin (1996)
110
was simply due to the larger data set (Fennel et al., 2009), although it may have been due to the
111
mixture of organic matter (i.e. high and low C:N organic matter) across the different aquatic
112
systems. In another compilation study across multiple estuaries, seasons and habitats the average
113
slope of dark rates of denitrification versus SOD was 0.063 (Table 1), and it was suggested that the
114
lower slope compared to the earlier work of Seitzinger and Giblin (1996) was due to weaker
115
coupling between nitrification and denitrification (Piehler and Smyth, 2011), but again it may have
116
been due to the mixture of organic matter (i.e. high and low C:N organic matter) across the different
117
habitats. This same study also found a range of different slopes in different seasons and habitats
118
ranging from 0.036 to 0.107 (Table 1). Similarly, in a subtropical coastal system a low slope of
5
119
0.036 was found across multiple benthic habitats (Eyre et al., 2011a). A recent compilation of dark
120
denitrification rates and SOD measurements in permeable carbonate sands found two slopes, and it
121
was argued that the difference was due to the type of organic matter being mineralised (Eyre et al.,
122
2013). A steeper slope of 0.089 was proposed to be driven by the mineralisation of episodic inputs
123
of low C:N phyto-detritus, whereas a lower slope of 0.036 was driven by inputs of high C:N organic
124
matter from coral reefs (Table 1).
125
126
Previous studies that have looked at the control of SOD on denitrification have all used rates
127
measured in the dark. Benthic denitrification rates measured in shallow coastal systems in the light
128
are usually different to dark rates due to the influence of benthic primary producers (Eyre and
129
Ferguson, 2005; Ferguson and Eyre, 2013). Benthic production during the light can increase the
130
penetration of oxygen into the sediments with contrasting effects. Coupled nitrification-
131
denitrification may be enhanced if NH4+ is readily available (Risgaard-Petersen et al., 1994; An and
132
Joye, 2001; Eyre and McKee, 2002), whereas denitrification driven by water column NO3- may
133
decrease due to consumption of NO3- by benthic microalgae and an increase in the diffusional path
134
length (Rysgaard et al., 1994). It is unknown if light denitrification rates will be well correlated with
135
SOD due to the influence of benthic primary producers.
136
137
The first hypothesis of this study is that dark rates of benthic N2 efflux (net denitrification)
138
will be strongly positively correlated with SOD, but the slope of this relationship will vary
139
depending on the sources (quality) of organic matter driving respiration (SOD). We tested this
140
hypothesis by undertaking benthic N2 efflux and SOD measurements (data in Maher and Eyre,
141
2011) over four seasons, in up to twelve benthic habitats, in three estuaries on the east coast of
142
Australia. This gave a broad range of organic matter (detritus) quality. Stable isotopes and sediment
143
molar C:N ratios were used to identify changes in the sources of organic matter driving benthic
144
respiration. The second hypothesis of this study is that SOD will not be a good predictor of light
6
145
rates of benthic denitrification due to the over-riding control of benthic production. We tested this
146
hypothesis by making the above benthic N2 efflux measurements over diel cycles. The findings
147
from this study give insight into how changes in detrital resources in coastal systems associated
148
with global change will influence key ecosystem processes such as denitrification.
149
150
2.0 Methods
151
152
153
2.1 Study Area
Detailed descriptions of the three study estuaries can be found in Eyre and Maher (2010)
154
and Maher and Eyre (2011). Briefly, the estuaries are located along the South-East Australian coast
155
and fall along an estuarine maturity gradient where they have evolved by gradually infilling (Roy et
156
al., 2001). Wallis Lake is an immature stage estuary with a large central mud basin, Camden Haven
157
is an intermediate stage estuary with a more restricted shallower central basin, and the Hastings
158
River Estuary is at a mature stage with a river-dominated system characterized by river channels
159
with a highly restricted/absent central mud basin. These different stages result in distinct differences
160
in estuarine area, water residence time, catchment area and freshwater inflow (see Table 1 in Maher
161
and Eyre, 2011), the distribution of benthic habitats in each system (see maps in Eyre & Maher,
162
2010) and ecosystem scale carbon cycling (Maher and Eyre, 2012). A total of 12 benthic habitats
163
were identified in the three estuaries using a combination of underwater video, diving transects, and
164
remote sensing techniques (Table 2). The benthic habitats were delineated based on their depth
165
(subtidal, intertidal), sediment grain size (mud dominant, sand dominant), geomorphology
166
(channels, depositional basins, shoals) and dominant autotrophs (macroalgae, seagrass (Halophila
167
ovalis, Zostera capricorni, Posidonia australis and Ruppia megacarpa)).
168
169
170
Rainfall was below average, water temperature varied from ~13°C to ~ 27°C, and bottom
water oxygen concentrations generally ranged from ~5 mg L-1 to ~10 mg L-1 during the study
7
171
period, although values as low as 1 mg L-1 were recorded at dawn in some seagrass areas (Maher
172
and Eyre, 2011). The estuaries have a relatively small catchment population (24 000 – 48 000;
173
Maher and Eyre, 2011) although there is modification of the catchment for agricultural uses (for full
174
description of estuarine stressors see Eyre and Maher, 2010).
175
176
177
2.2 Benthic N2 flux (net denitrification) measurements
Flux sites that best represented the benthic habitat within each estuary were selected using
178
benthic habitat maps (Eyre and Maher, 2010). A total of 11, 16 and 17 sites were sampled in
179
triplicate over four seasons in the Hastings River (n=132), Camden Haven (n=192) and Wallis Lake
180
(n=204) estuaries respectively, during field campaigns in July 2006 (winter), October 2006 (spring),
181
February 2007 (summer) and April 2007 (autumn).
182
183
N2 fluxes were measured using a combination of in situ benthic chamber incubations and
184
field laboratory-based sediment core incubations. Benthic chambers were used in habitats
185
characterised by seagrass and/or large burrowing macrofauna, as the important structural elements
186
of these habitats could not be captured in cores. Cores were used in all other habitats. We believe
187
that there is no large systematic bias introduced by using a combination of cores and chambers
188
because of the high r2 between benthic fluxes measured in cores and chambers and measures which
189
are independent of the incubation device such as sediment δ13C (see Results). In addition, previous
190
studies have also shown that in shallow water coastal systems cores and chambers give comparable
191
nutrient flux data (Asmus et al. 1998).
192
193
Details of the core and chamber incubations are given in Maher and Eyre (2011). Briefly,
194
triplicate sediment cores were collected at each site with plexiglass tubes (95 mm ID x 500 mm
195
length) pushed approximately 200 mm into the sediment, leaving an overlying water volume of
196
~1.9 L. Cores were discarded if there was any surface disturbance of sediments. Uncapped sediment
8
197
cores were placed in one of four large (150 L) perspex tanks filled with site water. Stirring was
198
maintained at a speed just below the resuspension threshold via rotating magnets throughout the
199
equilibration and incubation periods. Light was delivered by four high pressure 400 W sodium
200
bulbs (Philips Son T Agro) with in situ light conditions emulated by shading individual cores to
201
site-specific mean daily irradiance levels (± 5%). Following a 24 h equilibration period, the cores
202
were incubated over a 24 h diel cycle.
203
204
Dissolved oxygen concentrations (Hach LDO optode DO meter, ± 0.01 mg L-1) and pH and
205
temperature (Denver AP25 pH probe, ±0.001 pH units, ± 0.1°C) were measured, and alkalinity and
206
N2:Ar samples were collected at 0 (i.e., dusk) and 10 or 12 h during the dark cycle and 0 (i.e. dawn)
207
and 12 or 14 h during the light cycle. Alkalinity samples were withdrawn with a plastic syringe and
208
0.45 µm filtered water was transferred to a 10 mL milli-Q soaked and sample-rinsed polyethylene
209
vial for alkalinity analysis. To minimise the introduction of bubbles, N2 samples were collected in
210
duplicate by allowing water to flow, driven by the reservoir head, directly into 7 mL gas-tight glass-
211
stoppered glass vials filled to overflowing. The replacement water for all samples was withdrawn
212
from a sealed collapsible reservoir bag, also equilibrated at in-situ light (±5.0%) and temperature
213
(±1°C) conditions, to maintain constant Ar concentrations. Alkalinity samples were refrigerated at
214
4°C. N2:Ar samples were poisoned with 20 µl of 5% HgCl2 and stored submerged at ambient
215
temperature. N2:Ar samples were analysed on a membrane inlet mass spectrometer with oxygen
216
removal (Eyre et al., 2002). The O2, alkalinity and TCO2 (alkalinity and pH) data is presented in
217
Maher and Eyre (2011). At the conclusion of the core incubations the top 0 -10 mm depth was
218
sectioned for sediment TOC, TN and δ13C concentrations. Samples were placed in aluminium foil
219
and frozen (-20°C) until analysis. For chamber incubations, a sediment core was collected from
220
within each chamber (95 mm id, 200 mm deep) and was sampled as above. Full details of analytical
221
methods are presented in Maher and Eyre (2010). The sediment TOC and TN concentrations and
222
δ13C values are summarised in Maher & Eyre (2010) and are presented here in full.
9
223
224
Benthic chambers of a similar design to those described by Webb & Eyre (2004), but with a
225
larger volume to surface area ratio (50 l : 840 cm2), were used for in situ diel incubations in
226
macrophyte (i.e. seagrass and macroalgae) communities and shallow subtidal/intertidal habitats
227
colonised by burrowing macrofauna (predominantly the thalassinidean shrimp Trypaea
228
australiensis). Chambers were equilibrated for ≥ 24 h with the lids open, allowing free exchange of
229
water. Chambers were then sealed at dusk and sampled for O2, pH, temperature, N2: Ar and
230
alkalinity (as per core incubations) over an 18 h incubation (0h, dawn, dawn + ~ 6h) with the light
231
period capturing solar noon.
232
233
234
2.3 Calculations
N2 fluxes across the sediment-water interface were calculated using the start- and end-point
235
concentration data, corrected for the addition of replacement water, as a function of incubation time,
236
core/ chamber water volume and surface area. Dark flux rates were calculated using concentration
237
data from the night-time part of incubations and light flux rates were calculated using concentration
238
data from the day-time part of incubations. Careful consideration was given to the possible effect of
239
bubbles on N2 fluxes (Eyre et al., 2002). All samples over 96% O2 saturated were excluded from N2
240
flux calculations because it was clear that these samples were affected by bubbles. As such, many
241
dark and light rates are missing due to both the initial and end dusk samples being over 96% O2
242
saturated. Bubbles have the effect of reducing N2 concentrations, giving much higher dark N2 flux
243
rates and lower light N2 flux rates or apparent rates of N-fixation. Despite the missing N2 fluxes,
244
both dark and light net denitrification rates were determined in all seasons for all estuaries, and in
245
all habitats in all estuaries, but not all habitats in all seasons in all estuaries. Because N2 fluxes were
246
measured they include both canonical denitrification and anammox. N2 fluxes reflect the balance
247
between N-fixation and denitrification and as such, are a measure of net denitrification. The terms
248
N2 efflux and net denitrification are used interchangeably.
10
249
250
251
2.4 Ternary mixing diagrams
Ternary mixing diagrams were used to determine the relative contribution of algae, seagrass
252
and terrestrial/ mangrove organic matter to the sediment organic matter in each season in each
253
estuary as a whole, and in each habitat across all estuaries. However, instead of using a single end-
254
member value, a range of average measured δ13C values from the three systems and single literature
255
molar C:N (N:C) ratios were used for each end-member. N:C ratios were used in graphs for ease of
256
visualisation. The algal δ13C end-member ranged from -18.6 ± 3.8‰ (n= 73) for bulk live
257
microphytobenthos and phyto-detritus to -14.8 ± 1.2‰ for epiphytes (Maher and Eyre, 2010) with a
258
C:N ratio of 6.6 (N:C = 0.15). The bulk live seagrass end-member ranged from -15.0 ± 2.9‰
259
(n=18) for Zostera capricorni to -11.21 ± 0.32‰ (n=6) for Posidonia australis (Maher and Eyre,
260
2010) with an C:N ratio of 20 (N:C = 0.05) (Gonneea et al., 2004). The bulk live terrestrial/
261
mangrove end-member ranged from -32.4 ± 2.0‰ (n=18) (Maher and Eyre, 2010) to -27.0 ± 4.0‰
262
for terrestrial organic matter (Michener and Schell, 1994; Marshall et al., 2007) with a C:N ratio of
263
50 (N:C = 0.02) (Gonneea et al., 2004).
264
265
266
267
2.5 Statistical analysis
A paired t-test was used to determine if there was a statistical difference between dark and
268
light fluxes of N2 (α=0.05). One-way ANOVAs were used to explore seasonal, habitat type and
269
estuary differences for N2 fluxes (dark, light and net) and sediment TOC, TN and δ13C. Where
270
significant differences were found (i.e., p<0.05), Tukey HSD post hoc tests were used to determine
271
homogenous subsets. All analyses were done using SPSS v20.0 software.
272
273
To test for significant differences between individual sediment oxygen demand versus dark N2
274
effluxes slopes, the t statistic was calculated as a function of the difference of the slopes divided by
11
275
the difference in the standard error of the slopes, and p was calculated using the t value and n - 4
276
degrees of freedom (Kleinbaum et al 2008).
277
278
3.0 Results
279
N2 fluxes ranged from 3.5 µmol N2-N m-2 h-1 in the SS habitat in Wallis Lake in the dark
280
during autumn to 551.6 µmol N2-N m-2 h-1 in the SM habitat in Hastings River in the dark during
281
summer. N2 fluxes were significantly higher in the dark than the light (p=0.003) (Table 3). Dark N2
282
fluxes were significantly different between seasons (p=0.002), estuaries (p<0.026) and habitats
283
(p<0.001) (Table 3). N2 fluxes were higher in spring and winter than in summer and autumn. N2
284
fluxes in the Hastings River Estuary and Wallis Lakes were higher than in Camden Haven. The H,
285
IS, Z, MA, and R habitats had higher rates of net denitrification than the SS, SM, DM, P, MC, IM
286
and FMS habitats. Light N2 fluxes were only significantly different between habitats with the IS
287
and MA habitats having higher rates than the R, P, Z and IM habitats which, in turn, had higher
288
rates than the MC, H and FMS habitats. The lowest net denitrification rates in the light were in the
289
SM and SS habitats.
290
291
Sediment δ13C values ranged from -27.3 ‰ in the SS habitat during winter in the Hastings
292
River Estuary to -11.4 ‰ in the SS habitat during summer in Wallis Lakes (Table 4). Sediment δ13C
293
values were significantly different between seasons (p=0.02), estuaries (p<0.001) and habitats
294
(p<0.001) (Table 4). In summer and spring sediment δ13C values were more enriched than in winter
295
and autumn. Sediment organic matter in Wallis Lake had more enriched δ13C values than in
296
Camden Haven, which in turn, had more enriched δ13C values than in the Hastings River Estuary.
297
The MA habitat had the most enriched sediment δ13C values, followed by the P and R habitats, then
298
the Z and H habitats, and then the SM, DM, IM, IS, SS and MC habitats. The FMS habitat had the
299
most depleted sediment δ13C values.
300
12
301
Sediment total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations ranged from 0.07% in the MC habitat
302
during summer and autumn in Wallis Lake to 7.51% in the FMS habitat during winter in the
303
Hasting River Estuary (Table 4). TOC concentrations were significantly different between estuaries
304
(p<0.001) and habitats (p<0.001), but not seasons (p=0.979). Sediments in Wallis Lake had the
305
highest TOC concentrations, followed by Camden Haven, with the lowest sediment TOC
306
concentrations in the Hasting River Estuary. The highest TOC concentrations were in the R and
307
MA habitats, followed by the SM, DM, Z, H and FMS habitats and then the P, MC and IM habitats.
308
The SS and IS habitats had the lowest TOC concentrations.
309
310
The patterns of sediment nitrogen concentrations were similar to those for TOC (Table 4).
311
Sediment nitrogen concentrations ranged from 0.02% in a number of habitats during different
312
seasons in all systems, to 0.54% in the Z habitat during spring in Wallis Lake. Sediment nitrogen
313
concentrations were significantly different between seasons (p<0.001), estuaries (p<0.001) and
314
habitats (p<0.001). Sediments in Wallis Lake had the highest nitrogen concentrations, followed by
315
Camden Haven, with the lowest sediment nitrogen concentrations in the Hasting River Estuary. The
316
highest sediment nitrogen concentrations were in the R and MA habitats, followed by the SM, DM,
317
Z, H and FMS habitats and then the P, MC and IM habitats. The SS and IS habitats had the lowest
318
sediment nitrogen concentrations.
319
320
4.0 Discussion
321
4.1 Comparison of Denitrification Rates
322
Few studies have looked at denitrification rates across multiple habitats within a coastal
323
system (e.g. Piehler and Smyth, 2011), and only one of these has measured denitrification rates over
324
a diel cycle (Eyre et al., 2011a). Subtidal, intertidal and seagrass habitats are the only common
325
habitats across all these multiple habitat studies. Similar to this study, most multiple habitat studies
326
have found higher dark rates of denitrification in seagrass habitats compared to intertidal and
13
327
subtidal shoals, although the higher rates may only occur in some seasons (Eyre et al, 2011a; Eyre
328
et al., 2011b; Piehler and Smyth, 2011; Smyth et al., 2012). These more recent high rates of net
329
denitrification using the N2: Ar technique (28 to 824 µmol m-2 h-1) contrast with earlier very low
330
rates (<1 to 35 µmol m-2 h-1) of denitrification measured in seagrass communities using isotope
331
pairing (e.g. Risgaard-Petersen et al., 1998; Risgaard-Petersen and Ottosen, 2000; Welsh et al.
332
2000). Eyre et al., (2011a) suggested that such differences may reflect a difference between tropical
333
and temperate systems, with higher rates in tropical systems and lower rates in temperate systems.
334
However, Piehler and Smyth (2011) and Smyth et al. (2012) recently measured high rates of net
335
denitrification in temperate seagrass communities using N2: Ar ratios. This suggests that the
336
differences are either methodological, with lower rates measured using isotope pairing and higher
337
rates measured using N2: Ar, or due to the biogeochemistry of the different seagrass species. For
338
example, low rates of coupled nitrification-denitrification might reflect irregular oxygen release by
339
the roots of some temperate seagrass species (Frederiksen and Glud, 2006). Further work using both
340
methods simultaneously in different seagrass communities is required.
341
342
343
4.2 Organic matter control on N2 effluxes
Dark N2 fluxes were strongly controlled by SOD (data from Maher and Eyre, 2011) across
344
the three estuaries, four seasons and twelve benthic habitats (r2 = 0.743; p<0.001; n=142; slope =
345
0.0170; Fig. 1; Table 5). Dark N2 fluxes also showed a strong correlation with dark TCO2 effluxes
346
(r2 = 0.499; p<0.0001; n=142; slope= 0.0147; TCO2 data from Maher and Eyre, 2011)
347
demonstrating that much of the SOD is due to organic matter oxidation. Average water column
348
nitrate concentrations across most habitats were <3 µmol L-1 (Eyre and Maher, 2010), suggesting
349
that much of the N2 flux was driven by coupled nitrification-denitrification. As such, the control of
350
SOD on N2 effluxes most likely reflects an increased supply of NH4+ from ammonification for
351
coupled nitrification–denitrification, the availability of electron donors for denitrification, and
352
modification of sediment redox conditions.
14
353
354
There were differences however, in the slope of dark N2 fluxes versus SOD (benthic
355
respiration) between seasons, between estuaries, and between habitats (Table 5). Although only
356
some of the slopes were significantly different from each other (Tables 6 and 7), all the different
357
slopes were highly correlated with δ13C values of sediment organic carbon across the different
358
habitats (Fig. 2a), and different seasons, in different estuaries (Fig. 2b). The δ13C value of organic
359
matter reflects its source (Peterson, 1999) and, as such, the δ13C values of sediment organic carbon
360
reflect the mixture of different sources of organic matter within the sediments (see later discussion
361
of changes during mineralisation). This suggests that the slope of dark N2 fluxes versus benthic
362
respiration is driven by the type, or mixture, of organic matter undergoing mineralization (Eyre et
363
al., 2013). An increase in the gradient of the slope was related to more depleted sediment δ13C
364
values. Sediment C:N ratios were also correlated with the slope of dark N2 fluxes versus benthic
365
respiration across both the different habitats (Fig. 2c) and different seasons in different estuaries
366
(Fig. 2d). Interestingly, higher C:N ratios were related to an increase in the gradient of the slope.
367
However, the C:N relationship was weaker than with sediment δ13C values, demonstrating that the
368
type, or mixture, of organic matter undergoing mineralization was a more important control than its
369
C:N ratio.
370
371
Ternary mixing diagrams showing the contributions of algal, seagrass and terrestrial/
372
mangrove material to sediment organic matter give some insight into how changes in the type, or
373
mixture, of organic matter influence the slope of dark N2 fluxes versus benthic respiration across
374
different habitats, estuaries and seasons (Figs. 3 and 4). Sediments dominated by approximately
375
equal mixtures of seagrass and algal material have the lowest slopes. The slopes increase for
376
habitats that also have a contribution from terrestrial/ mangrove material, with the steepest slope in
377
the FMS habitat reflecting approximately equal proportions of terrestrial/ mangrove and algal
378
material. Similarly, the lowest slopes were in Wallis Lake where organic matter in the sediments
15
379
was dominated by equal mixtures of algae and seagrass, and the highest slopes were in the Hastings
380
River Estuary where terrestrial/ mangrove material made a larger contribution (Fig. 4). The slopes
381
also increased in the seasons that had the largest contribution of terrestrial/ mangrove material, such
382
as winter in the Hastings River Estuary, summer in Camden Haven and autumn in Wallis Lake (Fig.
383
4). These seasonal interactions probably reflect differences in the delivery and trapping of terrestrial
384
organic material due to different estuarine geomorphology.
385
386
4.3 Processes driving organic matter control on N2 effluxes
387
Although it is quite clear that the type, or mixture, of organic matter is driving the dark N2
388
fluxes versus SOD slopes across habitats, seasons and estuaries (Figs. 2a and 2b), the mechanisms
389
involved were not entirely clear. It may be due to one, or a combination of, the C:N ratio of the
390
organic matter, the mixture of C:N ratios making up the organic matter, the structure of the organic
391
matter, and/or the overall SOD rates. All this mechanisms would influence the community
392
composition of total bacteria, ammonia-oxidizing archaea and denitrifiers, which have also been
393
correlated to sediment δ13C in an estuarine system (Abell et al., 2013). We will explore each of
394
these mechanisms below.
395
396
Overall the dark N2 fluxes versus SOD slopes for this study were low (0.0114 to 0.0332;
397
Table 5) compared to most previous compilation studies (Table 1). For example, a slope of 0.116
398
has been reported for continental shelf sediments (Seitzinger and Giblin, 1996), a slope of 0.086
399
was found for a compilation of 657 denitrification and SOD measurements (Fennel et al., 2009),
400
and an estuarine study across multiple seasons and habitats found an average slope of 0.063
401
(Piehler and Smyth, 2011) (Table 1). Multiple lines of evidence suggest that higher slopes (e.g.
402
Seitzinger and Giblin, 1996) are driven by the decomposition of low C:N phyto-detritus and lower
403
slopes (this study) may be driven by the decomposition of mostly high C:N sources of organic
404
matter such as seagrass, mangrove and terrestrial material. The lower slopes in Fennel et al. (2009)
16
405
and Piehler and Smyth (2011) are probably also due to a mixture of organic matter sources driving
406
denitrification in these studies, whereas phyto-detritus would be the dominant source of organic
407
matter to the continental shelf sediments that had the higher slope of 0.116 (Seitzinger and Giblin,
408
1996). Flow-through reactor experiments using permeable carbonate sands and seawater, with
409
phytoplankton as the organic matter source, had a benthic respiration versus dark N2 efflux slope of
410
0.114 (Santos et al., 2012). The only experimental study to compare additions of organic matter of
411
different quality on dark N2 fluxes found a slope of 0.129 for low C:N (7.2) organic matter (phyto-
412
detritus) and a slope of 0.022 for high C:N (28.2) organic matter (slopes calculated from Figure 1 in
413
Oakes et al., 2011). Eyre et al. (2013) also speculated that high C:N organic matter from coral reefs
414
may be driving low dark N2 fluxes versus benthic respiration slopes (0.036) in permeable carbonate
415
sediment with higher slopes (0.089) driven by episodic input of low C:N phyto-detritus.
416
417
The dark N2 fluxes versus SOD slopes may also be driven by high C:N organic matter
418
which would release less nitrogen as N2 for a given amount of respiration. A lack of N release
419
would be enhanced due to competition for nitrogen by heterotrophic bacteria (Oakes et al., 2011);
420
N-limitation of the microbial decomposition of high C:N organic material results in the uptake and
421
accumulation of nitrogen by heterotrophic bacteria (Tupas and Koike, 1991; van Duyl et al., 1993;
422
Lomstein et al., 1998). Several types of bacteria can assimilate NH4+, including sulphate reducers
423
and fermentative bacteria (Koike and Sumi 1989). Additionally, sulphate reducers can fix nitrogen
424
(Nielsen et al., 2001). N2 effluxes are a measure of denitrification minus N-fixation and as such,
425
increased N-fixation will result in a reduced N2 efflux. Further, coupled nitrification-denitrification
426
may be suppressed by H2S produced during sulphate reduction (Joye and Hollibaugh, 1995;
427
Fulweiler et al., 2013). Consistent with higher rates of heterotrophic N-fixation during
428
decomposition of higher C:N organic material is the reduction in dark N-fixation rates in permeable
429
carbonate sands when low C:N phyto-detritus was deposited (Eyre et al., 2008). Nitrogen
430
assimilation and N-fixation by heterotrophic bacteria would be a nitrogen conservation process in
17
431
high C:N seagrass communities that would otherwise lose large amounts of nitrogen via
432
denitrification due to high rates of benthic respiration, i.e. the loss of nitrogen via denitrification per
433
unit of respiration is an order of magnitude lower (Table 5) than the loss in a low C:N environment
434
such as the continental shelf (Seitzinger and Giblin, 1996)(Table 1).
435
436
If the C:N ratios were an important control on the SOD versus N2 efflux relationships in this
437
study, it would be expected that higher slopes would be driven by low C:N algal material. However,
438
the steeper slopes occur in sediments with higher amounts of high C:N terrestrial/ mangrove
439
organic matter, which is the opposite of what was expected. Because of the stronger relationship
440
between the slopes and the δ13C than compared with C:N ratios, one explanation may be that the
441
structure of the decomposing organic matter is influencing the slope (Fig. 2 a-d). For example,
442
Dahllof and Karle (2005) found that the C:N ratio of organic matter added to sediments was not an
443
important control on nitrate uptake in the dark (inferred to be due to denitrification). Instead they
444
argued that nitrate uptake was related to the structure of the organic carbon, with greater nitrate
445
uptake driven by organic matter containing easily degraded lipids and starch, and lower nitrate
446
uptake driven by organic matter containing relatively refractory cellulose and lignin. This would
447
explain the low dark N2 fluxes versus SOD slopes in the seagrass habitats and Wallis Lake, which is
448
dominated by seagrass production (Maher and Eyre, 2011), but not the high slopes in the habitats
449
and systems with higher inputs of terrestrial/ mangrove organic matter.
450
451
Alternatively, the dark N2 fluxes versus SOD slopes in this study may reflect different components
452
of the high C:N organic matter or a mixture of low and high C:N organic matter. High C:N organic
453
matter dominates within the study systems, giving the low slopes compared to previous studies, but
454
the proportion of the labile component of the high C:N organic matter, or the low C:N proportion of
455
the organic matter mixture, driving the dark N2 fluxes versus benthic respiration slopes may vary
456
across the habitats, seasons and estuaries. For example, slopes increase for habitats with increasing
18
457
amounts of terrestrial/ mangrove material, but the SS and IS habitats that have higher proportions of
458
algal material for a given δ13C values also have slightly higher slopes (Figure 3). Even more subtle
459
is the P habitat, which has a slightly higher algal contribution and associated higher slope than the R
460
and H seagrass communities for a given δ13C value (Figure 3). The sediment organic matter δ13C
461
value and molar C:N ratio is a measure of the remaining organic matter after the more labile organic
462
matter has been mineralized. This is consistent with more depleted sediment δ13C values associated
463
with higher slopes, as removal of more labile 13C-enriched cellulose material results in more 13C
464
depleted lignin-rich material remaining in the sediments (Benner et al., 1987).
465
466
The type, or mixture, of organic matter also plays some role in the rates of SOD as
467
demonstrated by the correlation between sediment δ13C and average SOD across habitats
468
(r2=0.0410; p<0.05; n=12). The average SOD of a given habitat in turn may also play some role in
469
determining the dark N2 fluxes versus SOD slope (Figure. 2e), although this relationship is much
470
weaker across seasons and estuaries (Figure 2f). High rates of SOD would reduce the O2 available
471
for nitrification, and therefore reduce the efflux of N2 associated with coupled nitrification-
472
denitrification. High rates of respiration (i.e. organic carbon is not limiting) may also allow
473
heterotrophs to outcompete nitrifying bacteria for ammonium (Strauss and Lamberti, 2002). In
474
addition, labile organic carbon may allow heterotrophs to exert a stronger negative effect on
475
nitrification when using labile rather than than refractory organic carbon (Strauss and Lamberti,
476
2002), which may explain the low slopes at low C:N ratios (Figures 2c and 2d). In addition, high
477
rates of respiration may result in the production of H2S during sulphate reduction which may
478
supress coupled nitrification-denitrification (Joye and Hollibaugh, 1995) and sulphate reducers can
479
fix nitrogen (Nielsen et al., 2001) and thereby reduce the N2 efflux.
480
481
482
4.4 Light N2 effluxes
In contrast to N2 fluxes in the dark, N2 fluxes in the light were not correlated with sediment
19
483
oxygen demand (r2=0.003). N2 fluxes were also significantly lower in the light than in the dark and
484
were significantly different between habitats. The average ratio of dark to light N2 fluxes in the
485
twelve habitats (i.e., how much N2 fluxes were reduced in the light) was highly correlated with net
486
primary production (data from Maher and Eyre, 2011) (Figure 5). Because average water column
487
nitrate concentrations across most habitats were <3 µmol L-1 (Eyre and Maher, 2010), little nitrate
488
for denitrification would have been sourced from the water column. As such, reduced N2 fluxes in
489
the light are most likely driven by competition for ammonium and nitrate by benthic primary
490
producers (Risgaard et al., 1994; Sundback et al., 2000). This competition for nitrogen exerts a
491
stronger control on N2 fluxes in the light than does sediment oxygen demand (benthic respiration).
492
493
494
4.5 Implications
Detritus (non-living organic matter) is typically considered from a perspective of its
495
influence on food web composition and dynamics and its effect on trophic structure and
496
biodiversity (e.g., Moore et al., 2004). Manipulative experiments have shown that changing detrital
497
richness may influence rates of litter decay (e.g., Moore and Fairweather, 2006) and benthic
498
community structure (e.g. Bishop and Kelaher, 2008; Rossi et al., 2011). More recently, it has been
499
shown that biogeochemical processes such as benthic production and respiration, and associated
500
nutrient fluxes, were also influenced by detrital source richness and mixes (Kelaher et al., 2013).
501
The quality of detritus delivered to deep-sea sediments also influence rates of mineralisation
502
(Mayor et al., 2012). Because denitrification permanently removes nitrogen from an ecosystem by
503
converting fixed nitrogen to di-nitrogen gas it is a key ecosystem process. The impact of organic
504
matter quantity on denitrification has been well studied (e.g., Kemp et al., 1990; Caffrey et al.,
505
1993; Eyre and Ferguson, 2009). However, this study has demonstrated that it is not just the
506
quantity but also the type (quality), and maybe the mixture, of organic matter that is an important
507
control on denitrification, although we do not know the exact mechanisms involved. For example, if
508
more labile organic matter allows heterotrophs to outcompete denitrifiers, the long-term decrease in
20
509
the retention of recalcitrant particulate organic matter as seagrasses are replaced by algae during
510
eutrophication (McGlathery et al., 2007), may be a negative feedback with less nitrogen loss via
511
denitrification. As such rapid changes to detrital sources to coastal systems due to losses of
512
mangrove, seagrasses and salt-marshes (Mcleod et al., 2011), and associated increases in algae and
513
macrophytes (Cloern, 2001), are also expected to impact system level losses of nitrogen via
514
denitrification. Although SOD versus denitrification relationships have been recommended for
515
modeling (Fennel et al., 2009), for estimating denitrification in low nitrate coastal systems (Piehler
516
and Smyth, 2011) and up-scaling to global scales (Seitzinger and Giblin, 1996; Seitzinger et al.,
517
2006; Eyre et al., 2013), little is known about how different mixtures of organic matter influence
518
these relationships in coastal systems. Manipulative studies looking at the effect of detrital source
519
richness, mix and quantity on denitrification in coastal sediments would be a fruitful area for further
520
research.
521
522
Acknowledgements
523
We thank M. Bautista, J. Oakes, T. Browne, and D. Erler for assistance with fieldwork. Iain
524
Alexander is thanked for assistance with the sample and data analysis. This study was funded by
525
Port Macquarie Hastings Council, an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) to D.M. and ARC
526
Discovery (DP0342956) and ARC Linkage (LP0212073) grants awarded to B.E.
527
528
References
529
Abell, G.C.J., Ross, D.J., Keane, J.P., Oakes, J.M., Eyre, B.D., Robert, S.S., and Volkman, J.K.
530
(2013), Nitrifying and denitrifying microbial communities and their relationship to nutrient fluxes
531
and sediment geochemistry in the Derwent Estuary, Tasmania. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 70, 63-
532
75.
533
21
534
An, S., and S. B. Joye (2001), Enhancement of coupled nitrification-denitrification by benthic
535
photosynthesis in shallow estuarine sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 62-74.
536
537
Asmus R (1986), Nutrient flux in short-term enclosures of intertidal sand communities. OPHELIA
538
26, 1-18.
539
540
Banks, J. L., Ross, D. J., Keough, M. J., Macleod, C. K., Keane, J. and Eyre, B. D. (2013), Influence
541
of a bioturbating, metal-tolerant polychaete on benthic metabolism, denitrification and nitrogen
542
regeneration in metal contaminated sediments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 68, 30-37.
543
544
Benner, R., M. L. Fogel, E. K. Sprague and R. E. Hodson (1987), Depletion of 13C in lignin and its
545
implications for stable carbon isotope studies. Nature, 329, 708-710.
546
547
Bishop, M. J., and B. P. Kelaher (2008.), Non-additive, identity-dependent effects of detrital species
548
mixing on soft-sediment communities. Oikos, 117, 531-542. doi: 10.1111/j.2008.0030-
549
1299.16418.x
550
551
Borum, J. and K. Sand-Jensen (1996), Is total primary production in shallow coastal marine waters
552
stimulated by nitrogen loading? Oikos, 76, 406-410.
553
554
Brettar, I., and G. Rheinheimer (1992), Influence of carbon availability on denitrification in the
555
central Baltic Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37, 1146-1163.
556
557
Caffrey, J. M., N. P. Sloth, H. F. Kasper, T. H. Blacknburn (1993) Effect of organic loading on
558
nitrification and denitrification in a marine sediment microcosm. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 12, 159-
559
167.
22
560
561
Canfield, D. E., E. Kristensen, and B. Thamdrup (2005), Aquatic geomicrobiology. Elsevier
562
Academic Press, California, USA.
563
564
Cloern, J. E. (2001). Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine
565
Ecology Progress Series, 210, 223-253.
566
567
Cornwell, J. C., W. M. Kemp, and T. M. Kana (1999), Denitrification in coastal ecosystems:
568
Methods, environmental controls, and ecosystem level controls, a review. Aquat. Ecol., 33, 41–54.
569
570
Dahllof, I., and I.M. Karle, (2005), Effect on marine sediment nitrogen fluxes caused by organic
571
matter enrichment with varying organic carbon structure and nitrogen content. Mar. Chem., 94, 17–
572
26.
573
574
Eyre, B.D., and A. J. P. Ferguson (2005), Benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling in a sub tropical
575
east Australian estuary (Brunswick): Temporal variability and controlling factors. Limnol.
576
Oceanogr., 50, 81-96.
577
578
Eyre, B. D. and A. J. P. Ferguson (2009), Denitrification efficiency for defining critical loads of
579
carbon in shallow coastal ecosystems. Hydrobiologia, 629, 137-146.
580
581
Eyre, B. D., A. J. P. Ferguson, A. Webb, D. Maher and J. M. Oakes (2011a). Denitrification, N-
582
fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus fluxes in different benthic habitats and their contribution to
583
the nitrogen and phosphorus budgets of a shallow oligotrophic sub-tropical coastal system (southern
584
Moreton Bay, Australia). Biogeochemistry, 102, 111-133. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9425-6.
585
23
586
Eyre, B. D., R. N. Glud and N. Pattern (2008), Coral mass spawning – a natural large-scale nutrient
587
enrichment experiment. Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 997-1013.
588
589
Eyre, B. D. and D. Maher, (2010), Structure and function of warm temperate east Australian coastal
590
lagoons: implications for natural and anthropogenic change. In Coastal Lagoons: Critical habitats
591
of environmental change, edited by M. J. Kennish, and H. W. Paerl, pp. 457-481.CRC Press.
592
593
Eyre, B. D., D. Maher, J. M. Oakes, D. V. Erler, and T. Glasby (2011b), Differences in benthic
594
metabolism, nutrient fluxes and denitrification in Caulerpa taxifolia communities compared to
595
uninvaded sediment and seagrass (Zostera capricorni). Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 1737-1750.
596
597
Eyre, B. D. and L. McKee (2002), Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus budgets for a shallow sub-
598
tropical coastal embayment (Moreton Bay, Australia). Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 1043-1055.
599
600
Eyre, B. D., S. Rysgaard, T. Dalsgaard, and P. B. Christensen (2002), Comparison of isotope
601
pairing and N2/Ar methods for measuring sediment denitrification rates - assumptions,
602
modifications and implications. Estuaries, 25, 1077-1087.
603
604
Eyre, B. D., I. R. Santos, and D. T. Maher (2013), Seasonal, daily and diel N2 effluxes in permeable
605
carbonate sediments. Biogeosciences 10, 1-15.
606
607
Fennel, K., D. Brady, D. DiToro, R. W. Fulweiler, W. S. Gardner, A. Giblin, M. J. McCarthy, A.
608
Rao, S. Seitzinger, M. Thouvenot-Korppoo, and C. Tobias (2009), Modeling denitrification in
609
aquatic sediments. Biogeochemistry, 93, 159-178.
610
24
611
Ferguson, A. J. P and B. D. Eyre (2010), Carbon and nitrogen cycling in a shallow productive sub-
612
tropical coastal embayment (Western Moreton Bay, Australia): the importance of pelagic-benthic
613
coupling. Ecosystems, 13, 1127-1144.
614
615
Ferguson, A. J. P. and B. D. Eyre (2013), Interaction of benthic microalgae and macrofauna in the
616
control of benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes and denitrification in a shallow sub-tropical coastal
617
embayment (western Moreton Bay, Australia). Biogeochemistry 112, 423-440. DOI
618
10.1007/s10533-012-9736-x
619
620
Frederiksen, M. S. and R. N. Glud (2006), Oxygen dynamics in the rhizosphere of Zostera marina:
621
A two-dimensional planar optode study. Limnol Oceanogr, 51, 1072-1083
622
623
Fulweiler, R. W., S. M. Brown, S. W. Nixon, and B. D. Jenkins (2013), Evidence and a conceptual
624
model in heterotrophic marine sediments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 482, 57-68.
625
626
Fulweiler, R. W., S. W. Nixon, B. A. Buckley, and S. L. Granger (2008), Net sediment N2 fluxes in
627
a coastal marine system- experimental manipulations and a conceptual model. Ecosystems, 11,
628
1168-1180.
629
630
Glud, R. N. B. D. Eyre, N. Pattern (2008), Biogeochemical responses to coral mass-spawning on
631
the Great Barrier Reef : Effects on respiration and primary production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53,
632
1014-1024.
633
634
Gonneea, M. E., A. Paytan, and J. A. Herrera-Silveira (2004), Tracing organic matter sources and
635
carbon burial in mangrove sediments over the past 160 years. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science,
636
61, 211-227.
25
637
638
Joye, S. B., and J. T. Hollibaugh (1995), Sulfide inhibition of nitrification influences nitrogen
639
regeneration in sediments. Science 270, 623-625.
640
641
Kelaher, B., M. J. Bishop, J. Potts, P. Scanes, and G. Skilbeck 2013, Detrital diversity influence
642
estuarine ecosystem performance. Global Change Biology 19, 1909-1918.
643
644
Kemp, W. M., P. Sampoyu, J. Caffrey, M. Mayer, and K. Henriksen (1990), Ammonium recycling
645
versus denitrification in Chesapeake bay sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1545-1563.
646
647
Kleinbaum, D. G., L. L. Kupper, A. Nizam, K. E. Muller, K. E. (2008), Applied regression analysis
648
and other multivariate methods. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, USA.
649
650
Koike, I., and T. Sumi. (1989), Nitrogen cycling in coastal sediments with special reference to
651
ammonium metabolism, in Recent Advances in Microbial Ecology, edited by R. Maruyama. Y.
652
Morita and A. Uchida, pp. 365-369. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo.
653
654
Lomstein, B. A., A. Jensen, J. Hansen, J. B. Andreasen, L. S. Hansen, J. Berntsen, and H.
655
Kunzendorf (1998), Budgets of sediment nitrogen and carbon cycling in the shallow water of
656
Knebel Vig, Denmark. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.,14, 69-80.
657
658
Maher, D. T., and B. D. Eyre (2010), Benthic fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in three temperate
659
Australian estuaries: Implications for global estimates of benthic DOC fluxes, J. Geophys. Res. 115,
660
G04039, doi:10.1029/2010JG001433.
661
26
662
Maher, D. and B. D. Eyre (2011), Benthic metabolism in southeast Australian estuaries: habitat
663
importance, driving forces, and application of artificial neural network models. Mar. Ecol. Prog.
664
Ser., 439, 97-115. doi:10.3354/meps09336.
665
Maher, D. and B. D. Eyre (2012), Carbon budgets for three autotrophic Australian estuaries:
666
Implications for global estimates of the coastal air-water CO2 flux. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 26,
667
GB1032.
668
669
Marshall, J. D., J. R. Brooks, and K. Lajtha (2007), Sources of variation in the stable isotope
670
composition of plants, p. 22-60. In R. H. Michener and K. Lajtha [eds.], Stable isotopes in ecology
671
and environmental science, 2nd edition. Blackwell Scientific.
672
673
Mayor, D. J., B. Thornton, S. Hay, A. F. Zuur, G. W. Nicol, J. M McWilliam, and U. F. M. Witte.
674
2012. Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments. The ISME Journal 6, 1740-
675
1748.
676
677
McGlathery, K. J., K. Sundback, and I. C. Anderson. 2007), Eutrophication in shallow coastal bay
678
and lagoons: the role of plant in the coastal filter. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 348, 1-18.
679
680
McLeod, E., G. L. Chmura, S. Bouillon, R. Salm, M. Bjork, C. M. Duarte, C. E. Lovelock, W. H.
681
Schlesinger, and B. R. Silliman (2011), A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved
682
understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9,
683
552-560.
684
685
Michener, R. H., and D. M. Schell (1994), Stable isotope ratios as tracers in marine aquatic food
686
webs, in Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science. Edited by K. Lajtha and R. H.
687
Michener, pp 138-157, Blackwell Scientific.
27
688
689
Moore. C., E. L. Berlow, D. C. Coleman, P. C. de Ruiter, Q. Dong, A. Hastings, N. C. Johnstone,
690
K. S. McCann, K. Melville, P. J. Morin, K. Nedelhoffer, A. D. Rosemond, D. M. Post, J. L. Sabo,
691
K. M Scow, M. J. Vanni, and D. H. Wall (2004), Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity.
692
Ecol. Lett., 7, 584-600, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00606.x
693
694
Moore, T. N. and P. G. Fairweather (2006), Decay of multiple species of seagrass detritus is
695
dominated by species identity, with an important influence of mixing litters. Oikos, 114,
696
329-337, doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14576.x
697
698
Nielsen, L. B., K. Finster, D. T. Welsh, A. Donelly, R. A. Herbert, R. de Wit, and B. A. Lomstein
699
2001), Sulfate reduction and nitrogen fixation rates associated with roots, rhizomes and sediments
700
from Zostera noltii and Spartina maritima meadows. Environ. Microbiol., 3, 63-71.
701
702
Nixon, S. W., R. W. Fulweiler, B. A. Buckley, S. L. Granger, B. L. Nowicki, and K. M. Henry
703
(2009), The impact of changing climate on phenology, productivity and benthic-pelagic coupling in
704
Narragansett bay. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 82, 1-18.
705
706
Oakes, J. M., B. D. Eyre, and D. J. Ross (2011), Short-term enhancement, and long-term
707
suppression, of denitrification in estuarine sediments receiving primary- and secondary-treated
708
paper and pulp mill discharge. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 3400-3406.
709
710
Peterson, B. J. (1999), Stable isotopes as tracers of organic matter input and transfer in benthic food
711
webs: a review. Acta Oecological., 20, 479-487.
712
28
713
Piehler, M. F. and A. Smyth (2011), Habitat-specific distinctions in estuarine denitrification affect
714
both ecosystem function and services. Ecosphere, 2, 1-16.
715
716
Risgaard-Petersen N., T. Dalsgaard, S. Rysgaard, P. B. Christensen, J. Borum, K. McGlathery, L.
717
P. Nielsen (1998), Nitrogen balance of a temperate eelgrass Zostera marina bed. Mar. Ecol. Prog.
718
Ser., 174, 281-291.
719
720
Risgaard-Petersen N., L. D. M. Ottosen (2000), Nitrogen cycling in two temperate Zostera marina
721
beds: Seasonal variation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 198, 93-107.
722
723
724
Risgaard-Petersen, N., S. Rysgaard, L. P. Nielsen, and N. P. Revesbeck. (1994), Diurnal variation
725
of denitrification and nitrification in sediment colonized by benthic microphytes. Limnol.
726
Oceanogr., 39, 573-579.
727
728
Rossi, F., M. Incera, M. Callier, and C. Olabarria (2011), Effects of detrital non-native and native
729
macroalgae on the nitrogen and carbon cycling in intertidal sediments. Mar. Biol,. 158, 2705-2715,
730
doi: 10.1007/s00227-011-1768-6
731
732
Roy, P. S., R. J. Williams, A. R. Jones, I. Yassini, P. J. Gibbs, B. Coates, R. J. West, P. P. Scanes, J.
733
P. Hudson, and S. Nichol, S (2001), Structure and function of south-east Australian estuaries.
734
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 53, 351-384.
735
736
Santos, I. R., B. D. Eyre, and M. Huettel (2012), The driving forces of pore water and groundwater
737
flow in permeable coastal sediments. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 98, 1-15
738
29
739
Seitzinger, S., and A. E. Giblin (1996), Estimating denitrification in North Atlantic continental
740
shelf sediments. Biogeochemistry 35, 235-260.
741
742
Seitzinger, S., J. A. Harrison, J. K. Bohlke, A. F. Bouwman, R. Lowrance, B. Peterson, C. Tobias,
743
and G. Van Drecht (2006), Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis. Ecol.
744
App., 16, 2064-2090.
745
746
Smyth, A. R., S. P. Thompson, K. N. Siporin, W. S. Gardner, M. J. McCarthy, and M. F. Piehler.
747
(2012), Assessing nitrogen dynamics throughout the estuarine landscape. Estuaries and Coasts
748
10.1007/s12237-012-9554-3
749
750
Strauss, E. A. and G. A. Lamberti (2002), Effect of organic carbon quality on microbial
751
decomposition of DOC and nitrification rates in stream sediments. Freshwater Biol., 47, 65-74.
752
753
Sundbäck, K., A. Miles, and E. Goeransson (2000), Nitrogen fluxes, denitrification and the role of
754
microphytobenthos in microtidal shallow-water sediments: an annual study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
755
200, 59-76.
756
757
Tupas. L., and I. Koike (1991), Simultaneous uptake and regeneration of ammonium by mixed
758
assemblages of heterotrophic marine bacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 70, 273-282
759
760
Van Duyl, F.C., W. Van Raaphorst, and A. J. Kop (1993), Benthic bacterial production and nutrient
761
sediment-water exchange in sandy North Sea sediments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 100, 85-95
762
30
763
Webb, A. P. and B. D. Eyre (2004), The effects of two benthic chamber stirring systems: a
764
conventional rotor and a two dimensional flow system, over the diffusive boundary layer, solute
765
efflux and passive flow through a macrofauna borrow. Estuaries, 27, 353-362.
766
767
Welsh D. T., M. Bartoli, D. Nizzoli, G, Castaldelli, S.A. Riou, P. Viaroli (2000), Denitrification,
768
nitrogen fixation, community primary production and inorganic-N and oxygen fluxes in an
769
intertidal Zostera noltii meadow. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 208, 65-77
770
771
772
773
774
31
775
Figure captions.
776
777
Fig 1. Dark N2 flux (µmol N2-N m-2 h-1) versus sediment oxygen demand (µmol O2 m-2 h-1) across
778
the three estuaries, four seasons, and twelve benthic habitats.
779
780
Fig. 2. Sediment δ13C versus the slope of dark N2 flux (µmol N2-N m-2 h-1) versus sediment oxygen
781
demand (µmol m-2 h-1) (a) across the twelve benthic habitats, and (b) for each season in each
782
estuary; molar C:N ratio versus the slope of dark N2 flux (µmol N2-N m-2 h-1) versus sediment
783
oxygen demand (µmol O2 m-2 h-1) (c) across the twelve benthic habitats, (d) for each season in each
784
estuary; and average sediment oxygen demand versus the slope of dark N2 flux (µmol N2-N m-2 h-
785
1
786
each season in each estuary.
787
788
789
Fig. 3. Ternary mixing diagram showing the relative contribution of algae, seagrass and terrestrial/
790
mangrove organic matter to each habitat. Also shown for each habitat is the slope of dark N2-N flux
791
versus sediment oxygen demand (from Table 5). Habitat abbreviations given in Table 2. N:C ratios
792
were used for ease of visualisation. C:N ratio of 6.6 = N:C ratio of 0.15. C:N ratio of 20 = N:C ratio
793
of 0.05. C:N ratio of 50 = N:C ratio of 0.02.
) versus sediment oxygen demand (µmol O2 m-2 h-1) (e) across the twelve benthic habitats, (f) for
794
795
Fig. 4. Ternary mixing diagram showing the relative contribution of algae, seagrass and terrestrial/
796
mangrove organic matter in the three estuaries for each season. Also shown for each estuary for
797
each season is the slope of dark N2-N flux versus sediment oxygen demand (from Table 5). C:N
798
ratio of 6.6 = N:C ratio of 0.15. C:N ratio of 20 = N:C ratio of 0.05. C:N ratio of 50 = N:C ratio of
799
0.02.
800
801
Fig. 5. Ratio of dark to light N2 flux versus net benthic production for each of the twelve benthic
32
802
habitats. Symbol legend given in Figure 3.
803
33
Table 1. Slope of the relationship between sediment oxygen demand (µmol O2 m-2 h-1) and dark
N2 efflux (µmol N2-N m-2 h-1) (denitrification). All regressions were forced through zero as there
would be no N2 efflux when respiration equals zero.
Sediment Type
Slope
Source
Subtropical to temperate continental shelf muds
0.116
Seitzinger and Giblin 1996
Subtropical to temperate muds and sands
0.086
Fennel et al., 2009
Very coarse permeable carbonate sands
1
Eyre et al., 2008
Temperate muds, range of habitats from subtidal
0.036 to 0.107
shoals to seagrass
0.033
Piehler and Smyth, 2011
0.063 (average)
2
0.036
Eyre et al., 2011a
Fine muddy sand, low C:N organic matter
3
0.129
Oakes et al., 2011
Fine muddy sand, high C:N organic matter
3
0.022
Oakes et al., 2011
Very coarse permeable carbonate sands,
0.114
Santos et al., 2012
0.019 to 0.047
Eyre et al., 2013
Subtropical muds, range of habitats from
subtidal shoals to seagrass
low C:N organic matter
Fine to very coarse permeable carbonate sands,
high C:N organic matter
Fine to very coarse permeable carbonate sands,
0.035 (average)
0.089
Eyre et al., 2013
low C:N organic matter
804
1
Data from Fig. 4 in Glud et al. (2008) and Fig. 3 in Eyre et al. (2008); 2Data from Fig. 5 in Eyre et
805
al., 2011a, r2 is slightly less than in Eyre et al., 2011a due to forcing through zero. 3Slopes
806
calculated from Figure 1 in Oakes et al. (2011).
34
807
Table 2. Benthic habitats, descriptions and abbreviations (modified from Maher and Eyre, 2010).
Habitat
Description
Abbreviation
Intertidal sand
Intertidal habitats composed primarily of sand
IS
Intertidal mud
Intertidal habitats composed primarily of mud/ silt
IM
Subtidal sands
Subtidal shoal habitats, composed of sand
SS
Subtidal muds
Subtidal shoal habitats, composed of mud/silt
SM
Fluvial muds and sands
Channel habitats in the mid/upper estuary dominated
FMS
by fluvial sands and/or muds
Marine channel
Channel habitats, lower estuary, clean quartz sands
MC
Deep subtidal muds
Subtidal habitats >4 m deep dominated by muds
DM
Zostera
Seagrass habitats with Zostera capricorni dominant
Z
Halophila
Seagrass habitats with Halophila australis dominant
H
Ruppia
Seagrass habitats with Ruppia megacarpa dominant
R
Macroalgae
Habitats dominated by macroalgae
MA
Posidonia
Seagrass habitats with Posidonia australis dominant
P
808
35
809
810
Table 3. Seasonal dark and light N2 fluxes (µmol N2-N m-2 h-1) in the twelve habitats across Wallis Lake, Camden Haven and the Hastings River Estuary (mean ± SE, n=2 or 3).
ND = many dark and light rates are missing due to both the initial and end dusk samples being over 96% O2 saturated.
Habitat
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Dark
Light
Dark
Light
Dark
Light
Dark
Light
FMS
ND
ND
17.8
17.8
25.8 ± 8.6
47.3 ± 10.3
98.3 ± 25.5
65 ± 16.3
H
ND
ND
ND
ND
65.3
ND
19.1 ± 18.5
13.1 ± 5.5
IM
ND
100.2 ± 13.7
48.7 ± 0.3
ND
89.8 ± 65.6
ND
35.6
ND
IS
89.9
ND
172.3 ± 118.5
157.6 ± 45.6
212.6 ± 9.3
173.7 ± 29.3
234.2
257 ±
MC
ND
74 ± 9.3
ND
ND
25.1
13.1 ± 8
42.3
59.8 ± 7.5
SM
18.9 ± 12.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.5 ± 2.1
8.4 ± 2.9
ND
SS
ND
ND
ND
ND
16.2 ± 3.1
28.4 ± 11
13.5 ± <0.1
21 ± 11.4
Z
ND
ND
279.9
ND
445.2 ± 23.4
ND
247.5 ± 48.9
ND
FMS
ND
13.2
5.3 ± 3.1
8.2
58.9 ± 17.9
53 ± 32.8
16.3
2.4
H
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12.3
ND
21.4
IM
ND
ND
ND
83.3 ± 15.3
227.4
ND
75.0
189.6
IS
ND
ND
11.1 ± 7.9
ND
40.3
ND
ND
ND
M IS
ND
ND
87.9 ± 20.7
17 ± 9.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
MZ
ND
ND
118.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MC
ND
ND
26.2
21.2 ± 15.8
20.0 ± 5.2
45.6 ± 38.1
9.3 ± 4.1
13.8
Hastings River
Camden Haven
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
206.1
29.2 ± 15.5
86.6 ± 1.8
147.8 ± 38.4
SM
32.9 ± 6.5
26.5 ± 7.5
31.4 ± 4.0
13.8 ± 4.2
44.9 ± 10.2
25.7 ± 10.2
4.9
7.8 ± 4.7
SS
ND
ND
30.7
4.7 ± 0.3
13.7
18.3
14.5
18
Z
135.5 ± 24.2
ND
ND
118.1
ND
75.8
102.7 ± 15.1
ND
Wallis Lake
DM
ND
ND
17.2
8.6 ± 3.9
ND
11.6 ± 5.9
ND
15.6 ± 5.8
FMS
ND
31.8
11.5 ± 5.2
8.1 ± 3.1
8.8 ± 0.1
37.3 ± 13.8
53.5 ± 4.6
ND
H
ND
ND
62
ND
121.8 ± 7.2
75.1 ± 28.2
119.2 ± 32.0
ND
IM
ND
ND
11.9 ± 8.0
61.8
11.4
ND
21.7 ± 13.3
10.9
IS
ND
ND
19.9
ND
6.7 ± 3.7
ND
12.7 ± 6.2
ND
MA
34.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
205.6 ± 66.7
199.4
ND
MC
ND
ND
0.1
12.2
12.6 ± 1.9
43.5
ND
ND
P
78 ± 40.4
55.1
ND
93.8 ± 12.3
50.6
ND
188.3
33
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
244.7 ± 38.2
68.1 ± 38.9
132.1 ± 24.8
281.6 ± 57.9
SM
ND
ND
7.2
8.3
12.9 ± 1.1
4.3
13.6
ND
SS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.5
3.5
ND
Z
ND
ND
ND
ND
150.9 ± 24.1
ND
203.6 ± 61
78.4
811
812
813
37
814
815
Table 4. Seasonal sediment δ13C, total organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations (%) in the twelve habitats across Wallis Lake, Camden Haven and the Hastings River Estuary. Habitat
abbreviations given in Table 2.
Habitat
δ13C
Winter
TOC
TN
δ13C
Spring
TOC
TN
δ13C
Summer
TOC
δ13C
TN
Autumn
TOC
TN
Hastings River
FMS
-25.61 ± 0.51
H
ND
IM
-24.23 ± 0.6
IS
-24.42 ± 1.02
MC
-22.91 ± 0.57
SM
-26.88 ± 0.83
SS
-27.28 ± 0.7
0.83 ± 0.21
ND
1.07 ± 0.15
0.29 ± 0.09
3.67 ± 0.04
0.4 ± 0.13
0.21 ± 0.04
0.06 ± 0.01
ND
0.07 ± 0.01
0.02 ± 0.01
0.24
0.02 ± 0.01
0.02 ± 0.01
-24.14 ± 0.32
ND
-23.24 ± 0.49
-18.76 ± 0.32
-23.87 ± 0.11
-24.15 ± 0.24
-20.91 ± 0.57
0.48 ± 0.12
ND
2.28 ± 1.35
0.22 ± 0.04
4.88 ± 0.65
0.72 ± 0.12
0.2 ± 0.03
0.05 ± 0.01
0.1
0.15 ± 0.06
0.03 ± 0.01
0.25
0.05 ± 0.01
0.02
-22.83 ± 0.77
ND
-21.52 ± 1.24
-19.08 ± 0.18
-19.98 ± 0.4
-21.92 ± 0.31
-24.07 ± 0.85
0.26 ± 0.09
1.95 ± 0.14
0.79 ± 0.11
0.45 ± 0.15
3.36 ± 0.02
0.58 ± 0.07
0.2 ± 0.03
0.05 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.04 ± 0.01
0.26
0.05 ± 0.01
0.02
-23.38 ± 0.34
ND
-22.46 ± 0.1
-18.99 ± 0.32
-23.95 ± 0.04
-22.72 ± 0.1
-21.84 ± 0.29
0.44 ± 0.09
2.01 ± 0.18
0.75 ± 0.12
0.46 ± 0.19
3.06 ± 0.06
1.86 ± 0.25
0.23 ± 0.04
0.05 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.04 ± 0.02
0.2
0.12 ± 0.01
0.03 ± 0.01
Z
-20.57 ± 0.56
1.01 ± 0.19
0.07 ± 0.01
-19.72 ± 0.33
0.77 ± 0.24
0.07 ± 0.02
-19.74 ± 0.07
0.85 ± 0.05
0.08 ± 0.01
ND
ND
ND
Camden Haven
FMS
-23.4 ± 0.28
H
ND
IM
-15.43 ± 0.06
IS
-21.62 ± 0.18
M IS
-22.26 ± 0.74
MZ
-21.02 ± 0.32
MC
-21.93 ± 0.67
R
-15.81 ± 0.07
SM
-20.88 ± 0.72
SS
-24.83 ± 0.92
Z
-16.33 ± 0.05
7.51 ± 3.22
4.07 ± 0.1
3.08 ± 0.17
0.42 ± 0.06
0.42 ± 0.05
1.05 ± 0.15
0.11 ± 0.01
2.81 ± 0.52
2.83 ± 0.32
0.1 ± 0.01
4.04 ± 0.05
0.46 ± 0.14
0.38 ± 0.01
0.3 ± 0.02
0.04
0.03
0.07 ± 0.01
0.01
0.28 ± 0.05
0.21 ± 0.03
0.02
0.37
-23.81 ± 0.65
ND
-15.79 ± 0.16
-21.29 ± 0.24
-20.27 ± 0.72
-20.03 ± 0.18
-21.44 ± 0.62
-15.84 ± 0.56
-20.77 ± 0.46
-21.14 ± 0.87
-15.87 ± 0.17
2.9 ± 0.52
3.92 ± 0.19
1.61 ± 0.4
0.24
0.82 ± 0.19
2.76 ± 1.08
0.15 ± 0.03
2.42 ± 0.91
2.07 ± 0.23
0.13 ± 0.01
4.44 ± 0.05
0.16 ± 0.04
0.35 ± 0.02
0.17 ± 0.04
0.03
0.06 ± 0.01
0.2 ± 0.08
0.02
0.24 ± 0.08
0.15 ± 0.02
0.02
0.42
-21.67 ± 0.49
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-21.21
ND
-21.01
-20.76 ± 0.08
ND
2.16 ± 0.75
3.01 ± 0.11
2.02 ± 0.74
0.5 ± 0.09
0.64 ± 0.02
2.42 ± 0.4
0.12 ± 0.01
3.35 ± 0.18
1.94 ± 0.21
0.17 ± 0.03
4.04 ± 0.04
0.12 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.2 ± 0.07
0.05 ± 0.01
0.06
0.18 ± 0.03
0.02
0.34 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
ND
0.37 ± 0.01
-23.21 ± 0.48
-15.81 ± 0.11
-17.65 ± 0.56
-21.42 ± 0.11
-20.46 ± 0.27
-17.58 ± 0.28
-16 ± 0.04
-20.31 ± 0.63
ND
-16.4 ± 0.34
4.62 ± 0.77
4.28 ± 0.08
2.35 ± 0.23
0.69 ± 0.04
2.17 ± 0.35
1.82 ± 0.14
0.13
1.64 ± 0.43
2.49 ± 0.13
ND
3.78 ± 0.47
0.23 ± 0.03
0.32 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.02
0.08 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.02
0.14 ± 0.01
0.02
0.15 ± 0.04
0.2 ± 0.01
ND
0.28 ± 0.03
Wallis Lake
DM
-16.72 ± 1.09
FMS
-21.45 ± 0.32
H
ND
IM
-20.13 ± 1.32
IS
-19.79 ± 1.18
MA
-13.85 ± 0.05
MC
-23.59 ± 1.36
P
-14.83 ± 0.7
R
-13.95 ± 0.05
SM
ND
SS
-15.97 ± 0.53
Z
-16.94 ± 0.38
3.64 ± 0.35
3.49 ± 0.17
3.76 ± 0.3
1.12 ± 0.27
0.49 ± 0.17
3.55 ± 0.18
ND
1.03 ± 0.08
3.73 ± 0.03
ND
0.3 ± 0.05
1.02 ± 0.21
0.31 ± 0.03
0.24 ± 0.02
0.35 ± 0.03
0.09 ± 0.02
0.05 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
ND
0.09 ± 0.01
0.35
0.12 ± 0.01
0.03
0.08 ± 0.02
-16.44 ± 0.69
-22.77 ± 0.11
-13.98
-21.61 ± 0.02
-20.05 ± 0.58
-13.7 ± 0.07
ND
-13.86 ± 0.17
-14.31 ± 0.25
-22.25 ± 0.15
-13.37 ± 0.18
-14.73 ± 0.05
3.4 ± 0.35
3.82 ± 0.27
2.96 ± 0.8
1.98 ± 0.13
0.7 ± 0.02
2.97 ± 0.6
ND
1.13 ± 0.21
4.08 ± 0.38
2.28 ± 0.11
0.41 ± 0.02
5.59 ± 0.38
0.33 ± 0.04
0.26 ± 0.02
0.29 ± 0.08
0.17 ± 0.01
0.07
0.29 ± 0.04
ND
0.11 ± 0.02
0.39 ± 0.04
0.17 ± 0.01
0.05 ± 0.01
0.54 ± 0.04
-16.62 ± 0.66
-22.56 ± 0.69
-13.66 ± 0.04
-21.25 ± 0.1
-18.03 ± 0.59
-13.85 ± 0.1
-19.13 ± 0.5
-14.73 ± 0.59
-14.19 ± 0.08
-22.17 ± 0.11
ND
-14.35 ± 0.14
3.78 ± 0.35
3.1 ± 0.31
1.42 ± 0.4
2.3 ± 0.34
0.36 ± 0.09
5.06 ± 0.23
0.07 ± 0.01
1 ± 0.66
5.53 ± 0.14
2.92 ± 0.24
0.41 ± 0.11
5.23 ± 0.16
0.36 ± 0.04
0.27 ± 0.03
0.14 ± 0.04
0.2 ± 0.03
0.04 ± 0.01
0.47 ± 0.02
ND
0.1 ± 0.06
0.52 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.02
0.04
0.49 ± 0.02
-16.55 ± 0.63
-22.37 ± 0.18
ND
-21.32 ± 0.14
-18.71 ± 0.13
ND
-17.45 ± 0.93
ND
ND
-21.95 ± 0.14
-11.38 ± 0.17
ND
3.34 ± 0.34
3.64 ± 0.23
ND
2.05 ± 0.15
0.89 ± 0.12
ND
0.07 ± 0.01
ND
ND
2.65 ± 0.11
0.33 ± 0.04
ND
0.31 ± 0.03
0.28 ± 0.02
ND
0.17 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.19 ± 0.01
0.03
ND
38
816
Table 5. Slope of the relationship between sediment oxygen demand (µmol O2 m-2 h-1) and dark N2
817
efflux (µmol N2-N m-2 h-1). Regressions were forced through zero, as there would be no N2 efflux
818
when respiration equals zero. ns= not significant.
Estuary
All
Season
Slope
r2
n
p
All
0.0170
0.743
142
<0.001
Hastings
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
All
0.0298
0.0241
0.0212
0.0312
0.0237
0.712
0.745
0.964
0.754
0.828
4
6
17
22
49
ns
<0.05
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Camden Haven
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
All
0.0220
0.0231
0.0285
0.0148
0.0214
0.780
0.753
0.896
0.902
0.739
7
17
16
10
50
<0.05
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Wallis Lake
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
All
0.0130
0.0114
0.0132
0.0193
0.0146
0.697
0.715
0.961
0.702
0.820
3
11
19
19
52
ns
<0.01
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
0.0241
0.0241
0.0254
0.0254
0.0332
0.0244
0.0188
0.0211
0.0126
0.0142
0.0139
0.0165
0.697
0.801
0.790
0.440
0.536
0.741
0.934
0.661
0.717
0.889
0.712
0.711
14
12
9
27
34
7
3
12
9
9
3
3
<0.01
<0.001
<0.001
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
ns
<0.01
<0.01
<0.05
ns
ns
Habitat
Intertidal sands (IS)
Intertidal muds (IM)
Subtidal sands (SS)
Subtidal muds (SM)
Fluvial muds and sands (FMS)
Marine channel (MC)
Deep subtidal muds (DM)
Zostera (Z)
Halophila (H)
Ruppia (R)
Macroalgae (MA)
Posidonia (P)
819
820
821
822
Table 6. p values for test of significance between sediment oxygen demand versus dark N2 efflux slopes for individual habitats. Bold = <0.05.
Abbreviations for habitats are given in Table 2.
DM
FMS
H
IM
IS
MA
MC
P
R
SM
SS
DM
FMS
0.000
H
0.004
0.000
IM
0.081
0.043
0.000
IS
0.124
0.057
0.998
0.002
MA
0.220
0.659
0.000
0.017
0.024
MC
0.053
0.919
0.926
0.040
0.000
0.019
P
0.550
0.266
0.084
0.103
0.582
0.077
0.001
R
0.266
0.917
0.481
0.006
0.000
0.002
0.005
0.000
SM
0.073
0.718
0.742
0.771
0.018
0.000
0.003
0.031
0.000
SS
0.664
0.703
0.715
0.999
0.005
0.046
0.000
0.004
0.029
0.000
Z
0.246
0.327
0.389
0.220
0.205
0.145
0.054
0.003
0.000
0.032
0.000
Z
823
824
Table 7. p values for test of significance between sediment oxygen demand versus dark N2 efflux slopes for different seasons in the three estuaries
Bold = <0.05. H = Hastings, CH = Camden Haven, WL = Wallis Lake.
Camden Camden Camden Camden Wallis
Wallis
Wallis
Wallis
Hastings Hastings Hastings Hastings
Haven
Haven
Haven
Haven
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lake
Winter
Spring Summer Autumn Winter
Spring
Summer Autumn
Winter
Spring Summer Autumn
H Winter
H Spring
0.502
H Summer
0.114
0.478
H Autumn
0.849
0.153
0.001
CH Winter
0.350
0.691
0.800
0.036
CH Spring
0.361
0.818
0.401
0.782
0.021
CH Summer
0.322
0.321
0.409
0.085
0.050
0.001
CH Autumn
0.051
0.055
0.042
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
WL Winter
0.106
0.069
0.096
0.546
0.011
0.000
0.010
0.000
WL Spring
0.064
0.610
0.023
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.009
0.000
0.000
WL Summer
0.138
0.951
0.239
0.025
0.012
0.000
0.000
0.011
0.000
0.000
WL Autumn
0.152
0.274
0.319
0.449
0.165
0.001
0.001
0.035
0.069
0.002
0.002
825
42