SUSTAINABILITY
REPORTING IN THE
FINANCIAL SECTOR
A Governmental Approach
Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme, 2017
Use of this publication
This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and
in any form for educational or non-proit purposes without
special permission from the copyright holder, provided
acknowledgement of the source is made. United Nations
Environment Program (UN Environment) would appreciate
receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication
as a source.
No use of this publication may be made for resale or for
any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior
permission in writing from UN Environment.
Citation
UN Environment & Group of Friends of Paragraph 47,
Sustainability Reporting in the Financial Sector – A
Governmental Approach, 2016.
Disclaimer
The designations employed and the presentation of the
material in this publication do not imply the expression of
any opinion whatsoever on the part of UN Environment
concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or
area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its
frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do
not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy
of UN Environment, nor does citing of trade names or
commercial processes constitute endorsement.
For more information,
United Nations Environment Programme
Economy Division
1 rue Miollis, Building VII - 75015 Paris, France
http://www.unep.org
Job Number: DTI/2096/PA
ISBN: 978-92-807-3643-4
UN Environment promotes
environmentally sound
practices globally and its own
activities. This publication is
printed on certiied paper,
using eco-friendly practices.
Our distribution policy aims
to reduce UN Environment’s
carbon footprint.
Acknowledgements
Lead authors
Karin Ireton, Sustainability Matters
Victor Valido, UN Environment Consultant
Laura Ramirez, Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and the Sea, France
Editor
Joyce Paul
Contributing authors and researchers
Ana Maria Bernal and Samir Kiuhan, Financial Superintendent of Colombia
Christian Loy, RFU
Fernanda Rodrigues de Macedo, Getulio Vargas Foundation
Michel Tschirren, Swiss Federal Ofice for the Environment
Regina Schwegler and Renzo Iten, INFRAS
Sophie Constans, Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea, France
Supervision, coordination and technical support
Elisa Tonda, Head of Responsible Industry and Value-Chain Unit, Economy Division, UN
Environment
Robin Edme, Chairman, Group of Friends of Paragraph 47, Ministry of Environment,
Energy and the Sea, France
Publication design
Maria Pulcinella Murray, Digital Production Specialist, Philadelphia
Publication support and review
Chloe Joubert, Stephanie Nitze
Peer reviewers
Beate Ekeberg, Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment
Ellen Johansen and Rune Gottlieb Skovgaard, Danish Business Authority
Devina Naidoo and Tshwanelo Seeletsa, Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa
Julio Cordano, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Chile
Helena Rey de Assis, UN Environment
Raquel Breda, Alan Ainer Boccato Franco and Vana Tércia de Freitas, Ministry of Environment,
Brazil
Sebastien Truffer, Swiss Federal Ofice for the Environment
Victoria Morales Gorleri and Flavia Ortiz, Ministry of Social Development, Argentina
Wolfram Tertschnig and Verena Wittmann, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry,
Environment and Water Management, Austria
Yeinni Patiño and Santiago Montoya Roldan, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Tourism, Colombia
UN Environment and the GoF47 gratefully acknowledge the inancial contribution of the Austrian
Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management to this publication.
Contents
Foreword...............................................................5
1. Introduction......................................................10
1.1 Group of Friends of Paragraph 47.............................................................10
1.2 Research Methodology..............................................................................11
1.2.1 GoF47 Framework for Policy Evaluation .......................................11
1.2.2 Scope of this Report........................................................................12
1.3 Why the Focus on the Financial Sector? ..................................................13
1.4 The Leadership Factor................................................................................17
1.5 Current State of Reporting in the Financial Sector..................................18
2. Findings and Recommendations........................22
2.1. Key Findings...............................................................................................22
2.2. Key Recommendations for the GoF47 ....................................................26
2.3 Recommendations for Policy Makers .......................................................26
3. Finance Sector Speciic
International Initiatives........................................28
3.1 Addis Ababa Action Agreement...............................................................28
3.2 The Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System..............30
3.3 Financial Stability Board Task Force on Climate-related Financial
Disclosures .......................................................................................................30
3.4 UNEP Finance Initiative..............................................................................32
3.5 Principles for Responsible Investment ....................................................33
3.6 Conclusion..................................................................................................34
4. National Case Studies from GoF47 countries..35
4.1 Legal Requirements for Sustainability Reporting:
The Colombian and French Examples...........................................................35
4.1.1 Colombia...........................................................................................38
4.1.2 France...............................................................................................41
4.2 Legal Changes Promoting Disclosure and ESG Integration..................53
2
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
4.2.1 South Africa’s Pension Fund Amendment.....................................53
4.2.2 Switzerland: Increasing Public Pressure on Governance..............57
4.2.3 Brazilian Financial Institutions: Guidelines for Social and
Environmental Policies.............................................................................58
4.3 Voluntary Codes Promoting Sustainability Reporting.............................61
4.3.1 The South African Case..................................................................61
4.3.2 Swiss Voluntary Adoption of the PRI .............................................62
4.4 Market Instruments.....................................................................................64
4.4.1 Sustainable Responsible Investment Indices:
The Brazilian and South African Cases....................................................64
4.4.2 Labels and Awards: The Austrian Case.........................................79
5. Case Studies from Around the World..............89
5.1 Public Sector Reporting in the UK............................................................89
5.2 Indian Reserve Bank Takes Action ...........................................................89
5.3 Banking on Change in Nigeria, Bangladesh and China.........................90
6. Best Practice Examples of
GoF47 Public Financial Institutions......................93
6.1 ERAFP (France)...........................................................................................93
6.2 Caisse des Dépôts (France)........................................................................94
6.3 FINDETER (Colombia)................................................................................95
6.4 South African State-Owned Financial Institutions....................................97
6.5 Conclusion...................................................................................................98
7. Other Voluntary Disclosure Initiatives.............99
7.1 CDP..............................................................................................................99
7.2 Asset Owners Disclosure Project (AODP)...............................................100
7.3 Equator Principles....................................................................................101
7.4 World Federation of Exchanges (WFE) ..................................................102
7.5 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) .............................................................102
7.6 Conclusion................................................................................................102
3
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
8. List of Abbreviations......................................103
9. Index of Tables, Figures and Graphs..............107
10. Appendices..................................................108
4
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Foreword
Group of Friends of Paragraph 47
Given the role played, in many and diverse aspects, by the inancial sector in
our economies, the Group of Friends of Paragraph 47 investigated the ways
and means governments, policy makers, regulators and supervisors could
follow, in a consistent manner, to frame the appropriate enabling environment
to ensure the contribution of this key industry to a sustainable, resilient and
inclusive economy and society, primarily through its corporate sustainability
reporting.
The publication of Sustainability Reporting in the Financial Sector – A
Governmental Approach, the irst report of its kind, is very timely. Indeed, it
is today duly acknowledged that the private inance sector has a central role
to play in the ight against climate change. One of the major outcomes of
the December 2015 Paris Agreement is the up-front recognition of the role
inancial actors must play in “making inance lows consistent with a pathway
towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development”.
More generally, they are expected to make these inancial lows consistent
with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Third International
Conference on Financing for Development, Addis Ababa). Financial actors
have also strongly committed to it as the Paris Pledge for Action illustrates.
In order to have the capacity to monitor their contribution, sustainability
reporting is a paramount and powerful tool both for corporate actors and
policy makers. An incentive regulatory framework is essential to ensure the
effectiveness of these business commitments.
The inancial industry, through its lending and investment activities (whether
project inancing or asset management), has a major leveraging effect in
fostering responsible and transparent management practices at global,
national and regional scales. In this respect, inancial actors have a special
responsibility towards society, which should be strongly considered to form an
integral part of their iduciary duty. Since the global inancial crisis in 2008 and
albeit a stringent reinforcement of its regulatory environment, it is patent that
the sector has not been aligned with a sustainable future. Such an alignment
requires targeted and sector-relevant science-based disclosure of key material
sustainability data and narrative.
5
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Taking the advantage of its diversity, the Group of Friends of Paragraph 47 is
in a unique position to provide food for thought to policy makers who wish to
engage in the development of an enabling regulatory extra-inancial reporting
environment for the inancial industry. Understanding industry dynamics
through a thorough evaluation of the impact and contribution to sustainable
development is vital to strengthen the outcome of public policies.
We strongly believe in the power of sharing experience. Building on the
evaluation of our members’ national case studies, this report aims to guide
policy makers and regulators on the most suitable paths to develop a sound
sustainable reporting public policy, considering country-speciic and regional
characteristics while bearing in mind the need for quality sustainability
reporting that is relevant, comparable and auditable.
To meet this objective in a timely manner, one among the many lessons
learned when working on this report is that it has become very clear that
self-regulation is far from enough in the inance industry. Strong leadership is
therefore required by governments who have several tools as highlighted in
the various national case studies provided in this report.
Robin Edme
Chair of the Group of Friends of Paragraph 47
French Ministry of the Environment, Energy and the Sea
6
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry, Environment and Water Management
Finance is key to a functioning economy and society. The global inancial
system has changed rapidly during the past decades – and has raised a
growing concern on its suitability for future generations. Money is lowing
all over the world at the speed of light while labour force and production
are limited in their possibilities to change places. Decisions of investors to
get involved in projects scale up to the performance of economic sectors,
national economies, and to impacts on a global level. Adverse effects caused
by ruptures and failures in the inancial system are spread extremely fast and
persist over a long period. Finding political solutions to reform the system in
a sustainable manner takes much longer. Even in 2016, eight years after the
beginning of the 2008 crisis, it is a long way to transpose solutions in a way
that strengthen the resilience of inancial systems and contribute to a lowcarbon, circular economy.
Aligning investment decisions and other inancial services by the public
and private sector with environmental, social and governance criteria will
contribute to stabilizing the inancial system and will be instrumental in
achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The global report of the UNEP
Inquiry of 20151 argues that “there is now a historic opportunity to shape
a inancial system that can more effectively inance the development of an
inclusive, green economy. This opportunity is based on a growing trend in
policy innovation from central banks, inancial regulators and standard setters,
who are incorporating sustainability factors into the rules that govern the
inancial system.” The European Commission has recently announced that
it will develop a comprehensive European strategy on green inance in the
coming months.2
One way to identify and transpose good solutions is the exchange of
approaches through peer learning mechanisms. Since 2012, the Group
of Friends of Paragraph 47 has been pivotal in describing, sharing and
advocating policy measures developed by the public and the private sector
to promote sustainability performance and disclosure. This Financial Sector
Report, illustrating the approaches of different GoF47 member countries and
beyond them, provides for a “learning environment” to explore the spectrum
of policy approaches contributing to a inancial system that performs in a
sustainable manner. The speciic framework of the report and the appendix
1 The Financial System We Need: http://web.unep.org/inquiry/publications)
2 http://ec.europa.eu/inance/capital-markets-union/docs/20160913-cmu-accelerating-reform_en.pdf
7
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
allow comparing different policy instruments and methods in a structured
way. Best practice examples of GoF47 Public Financial Institutions show that
governments can walk their talk by setting the framework of transparency
disclosure for state-owned inancial service providers.
Wolfram Tertschnig
Director
Division of Environmental Aid Policy, Sustainability, Biodiversity
8
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
UN Environment
Governments play a decisive role in creating an enabling environment for
corporate transparency. This report, Sustainability Reporting in the Financial Sector
– A Governmental Approach, developed by the Group of Friends of Paragraph
47 and UN Environment, responds to the need for an enhanced understanding of
how policy makers can align the inancial sector to sustainable development.
The 2008 inancial crisis has reinforced civil society’s calls for more responsible
investment practices. The international community increasingly recognizes the
importance of the inancial sector in shaping a global economy characterised
by high capital mobility across borders, and in being a crucial player to achieve
sustainable development. As a decision-making tool that encourages public
accountability, sustainability reporting can help stakeholders assess the
allocation of capital and direct inancial resources towards sustainable economic
activities in an open and transparent fashion.
By focusing on governmental approaches to corporate reporting, this Report
offers solutions that link and contribute to the work of UN Environment’s Inquiry
into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System. One of the key indings
of this research is that one single sustainability reporting instrument is rarely
appropriate, given the diversity of the inancial industry. Instead, policy makers
may need to apply a combination of instruments. The publication also points
to signiicant challenges, starting from the lack of sectoral research. While the
inancial sector over time has become one of the main producers of sustainability
reports, it remains dificult to evaluate their usefulness for readers. More
harmonized data is clearly needed. Another key challenge points to the need for
coherence in combining sustainability disclosure requirements and the numerous
regulations already targeting the sector.
The way ahead may be complex, yet the beneits will by far outweigh the
efforts. This report emphasizes the need for stronger collaboration between
governments, the private sector, civil society and international organisations, an
approach at the core of UN Environment’s values. We encourage all stakeholders
to join hands in order to build the inancial system, and the future, that we want.
Ligia Noronha
Director
Economy Division
UN Environment
9
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
1. Introduction
1.1 Group of Friends of Paragraph 47
The Group of Friends of Paragraph 47 (GoF47) was created ahead of the
Rio +20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD/
Rio +20) by the governments of Brazil, Denmark, France and South Africa.
The GoF47’s objective is to support sustainable development through
sustainability reporting, transparency and disclosure, in line with Paragraph 47
of the Rio +20 Outcome Document, The Future We Want3.
Since 2012, the founding members have been joined by the governments
of Argentina, Austria, Chile, Colombia, Norway and Switzerland. UN
Environment and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) provide technical and
coordination support to the Group in a Secretariat capacity.
The GoF47 recognises the primary role that governments play in moving
society towards a sustainable model of development. Governments have the
ability to apply ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ policy and legal instruments that can positively
inluence corporate behaviour. The GoF47 intends to bring governments and
other stakeholders together to develop best practice examples of policy and
regulation for promoting corporate sustainability reporting – using stateowned inancial enterprises to set the example4.
The GoF47 believes that sustainability reporting is necessary for transparent,
well‐functioning market economies and for increasing the contribution of the
private sector to sustainable development. It promotes the use of existing
and widely used sustainability reporting principles, indicators and frameworks,
with an emphasis on scaling up and including SMEs and developing countries.
The GoF47 promotes the exchange of experiences, best practice policies,
continuous learning and an on-going emphasis on requirements for
sustainability reporting in international negotiations. It has published several
reports and conducted a number of dialogues with key stakeholder groups.
3 http://www.un.org/en/sustainablefuture
4 As expressed in the GoF47 working paper Walking the talk: Leading by example through State-Owned Enterprise
/ Public Agency Reporting: https://www.globalreporting.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/2014/GoF47%20-%20
Walking%20the%20Talk%20-%20Nov2014.pdf
10
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
1.2 Research Methodology
1.2.1 GoF47 Framework for Policy Evaluation
The framework outlined below (the full tool is provided in Appendix 2) forms
the foundation for the case studies in this report. It is directly based on the
Framework for Policy Evaluation developed for the GoF47 report Evaluating
National Policies on Corporate Sustainability Reporting (2015)5. As such,
it takes into account the criteria for effective policy evaluation, including a
policy’s clarity of purpose, scope and application as well as its eficiency and
effectiveness. The framework allows for a differentiated analysis of outcomes
and impacts, which may not always be aligned. It can be applied to countries
that have had policies in place for some time as well as to those that have
adopted policies more recently:
1. POLICY EVOLUTION
•
•
Context
Process
2. POLICY DESIGN
•
•
•
•
•
•
Objectives
Applicability
Scope and requirements
Reporting approach
Incentives and penalties
References
3. POLICY MONITORING
•
•
•
Interpretation and response
Effect on reporting quantity and quality (impact)
Effectiveness against objectives (success)
Key questions to address in each phase include:
Policy Evolution
What was the existing policy environment? Were there policies already in
5 http://www.unep.org/resourceeficiency/Business/SustainableandResponsibleBusiness/
CorporateSustainabilityReporting/GroupofFriendsofParagraph47/EvaluatingNationalPolicies/tabid/1060229/Default.aspx
11
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
place related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) on which a new policy
could be built? What were the national drivers and pressures for increased
transparency? Which stakeholders were involved in negotiating the policy
content? What were the main points of contestation and how were they
resolved?
Policy Design
Is the objective of the policy clearly described? Who should apply the policy?
Is the policy linked to other corporate reporting legislation? Is the policy
complex and dificult to understand? Does it take a rules-based or principlesbased approach? Does it deine which sustainability issues to report on
and how it should be done? What are the requirements for compiling and
publishing the report? Is it explicit in the requirements for reporters to be
in compliance? Does the policy have any built-in mechanisms to ensure
compliance? Does it specify any incentives or penalties? Who veriies
compliance? How is enforcement administered where there is no mandatory
veriication of compliance (e.g. by a third party)? Does it refer to international
frameworks or regional/transnational policies?
Policy Monitoring
What has been the effect (impact) of the policy on reporting or the
achievement of sustainable development policy objectives – either estimated
or known through studies or research? Is the policy on track to achieve its
objectives? Does the policy align with international expectations and best
practices?
1.2.2 Scope of this Report
This report takes a detailed look at reporting by the inancial sector. It
explores the variety of laws, regulations, codes and voluntary initiatives that
have driven reporting, illustrated through case studies. We recognise the
differences between the terms policy, legislation and regulation, and will
highlight these differences in the case studies. The framework generally uses
‘policy’ as shorthand for all three.
We also recognise that countries have taken different approaches. For
instance, France and Colombia have a mandatory ‘push’ approach through
legislation while countries like Brazil and South Africa follow the ‘pull’
approach adopted by stock exchanges who have incorporated reporting into
their stock exchange or securities listing requirements and through adoption
12
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
of voluntary codes. We note that in countries like Switzerland, public pressure
for greater transparency is a signiicant factor in changing behaviour. The
imposition of appropriate sanctions through any mechanism is not simple.
Companies in many jurisdictions may face multiple requirements from
different regulators requiring them to report on some – if not all - of the
sustainability requirements. Regulators that exercise authority over the
sector include inancial services regulators, regulators of companies, stock
exchanges as well as authorities that may impose requirements to report
on various social, environmental and labour requirements. Not all of these
will result in easily accessible information to stakeholders but, if available in
the public domain, it could provide a signiicant amount of the information
needed for sustainability reporting. In addition to general requirements
imposed on all companies or organizations (e.g. South Africa’s Black
Economic Empowerment Act and Employment Equity Act or France’s extrainancial reporting provision), as well as speciic requirements applicable to
companies within a certain segment of the inancial industry (e.g. France’s
Monetary and Financial Code on reporting by asset management companies).
Within each approach, we may also ind variations in the formulation that
combines elements of both.
This report will describe and compare different approaches and consider how
each may – or may not – be effective in bringing about the desired outcomes.
The resulting case studies will serve as important guidance for policy makers
to design or improve their requirements.
1.3 Why the Focus on the Financial Sector?
As was seen in the wake of the 2008 global inancial crisis, the activities of the
inancial sector affect individuals and businesses both nationally and globally.
The inancial services industry is a backbone of the real economy as it is a
provider of inancial capital. It is the essential piece in doing business around
the globe and is potentially a key driver for achieving the transition to an
inclusive, low carbon and resource eficient economy.
However, since the global inancial crisis, it has become clear that the sector
has not been fully aligned to a sustainable future. The current level of
mobilisation of the world’s inancial capital is insuficient6 for achieving the
Sustainable Development Goals and for the Paris Agreement7 reached at
6 http://web.unep.org/inquiry
7 http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
13
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
COP218 to limit global warming to less than 2°C, if not 1.5°C.
Due to its lending and investment activities, the sector has the potential
for major multiplier effects if it adopts and disseminates responsible and
transparent practices throughout the inancial capital value chain. Its
decisions to fund, or not to fund, to invest or not to invest, and its views on
what is too risky to insure and what risks are acceptable, send strong signals
to the economy and can provoke rapid change and adaptation.
The sector encompasses a signiicant range of activities and of public and
private money including:
•
Development aid and infrastructure investments;
•
The dispersion of public funds;
•
Public and private retirement savings and investments;
•
The deposit and use of privately held earnings and savings;
•
Investments of all kinds including those in listed equities or securities;
•
Corporate project inance, investment and commercial banking;
•
Transactional banking;
•
Mortgage and home loan inance;
•
Insurance.
Sustainability reporting can be a decisive tool when transitioning to a
sustainable economy. The UNEP Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable
Financial System and the World Federation of Exchanges as well as numerous
other players, including front-running asset owners and managers, are calling
for more targeted and sector-relevant disclosure of key sustainability data.
The needs of a sustainable future have been examined in detail in international
negotiations and are set out in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
in the Sustainable Development Goals which were agreed in 2015, and in the
commitment by Heads of State and Government to inancing mechanisms for
their effective implementation, as stated in the Addis Ababa Action Agenda
(AAAA)9. The AAAA recognised 100 concrete actions critical to the achievement
of the Sustainable Development Goals. All these initiatives recognise the
instrumental role of sustainability reporting in building a sustainable future.
The GoF47 evaluated intergovernmental and national initiatives on
8 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
9 Addis Ababa Action Agreement: www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/.../AAAA_Outcome.pdf
14
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
sustainability reporting (SR) for the inancial sector and best practice examples
of sustainability disclosure by public sector inancial institutions, in order to
develop actionable policy recommendations for governments.
The indings and recommendations of this report will support the Member
Governments of the GoF47 in providing global leadership to advance
sustainability reporting in the inancial sector.
TABLE 1
KEY INDUSTRIES WITHIN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR
PUBLIC/
PRIVATE
KEY
ACTIVITY
SOURCES
OF CAPITAL
INDUSTRY
SPECIFIC
TRANSPARENCY
INITIATIVES
Retail Savings
Both models
exist
Transactional
banking and
saving/credit
instruments
for individuals
or smaller
organizations
Deposits
of wages,
salaries,
beneits,
pensions
Financial sector
supplements
GRI, etc., or
national banking
associations
central banks
UNEP FI
Commercial
Investment
Usually
privately
owned
(some stock
exchange
listed)
Transactional
banking;
Project inance;
issue of
bonds, etc., at
competitive
interest rates
Deposits,
revenues and
investments,
international
borrowing
Equator
Principles
BANKING
INDUSTRY
IFC performance
standards and
similar.
Local initiatives
such as China’s
Green Credit
Guidelines,
Nigeria’s
Sustainable
Banking
Principles
Basel Committee
requiring risk
disclosure
Development
Finance
national and
multinational
15
Usually public
Financing
large scale
infrastructure
development
and public
entities such as
local authorities
National
taxes,
sovereign
wealth funds,
donor funds
Self designed,
modelled on IFC
performance
standards
and relecting
national
priorities
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
INVESTMENTS
BANKING
INDUSTRY
16
Central
Banks
PUBLIC/
PRIVATE
KEY
ACTIVITY
SOURCES
OF CAPITAL
INDUSTRY
SPECIFIC
TRANSPARENCY
INITIATIVES
Public
Control
national
money supply,
regulate
inancial
services and
government
funding
Taxes and
investments
Nationally
determined
Investments
national and
international
to secure
future revenue
for retirement
or pension
funding
Employee
and employer
contributions
and revenue
earned from
investments
– dividends,
etc.
PRI
Basel
Committee (risk
modelling and
reporting)
Institutional
investments
Long term
collective
(e.g. pension
funds)
Both
Retail
investments
Largely
private
Trade in stocks
and shared for
revenue
Private
savings
---
Stock or
securities
exchanges
Usually
private
Market place,
rules and
regulations
for the open
trading of
securities
or shares in
companies or
instruments
that meet
listings
requirements
Companies,
institutional
and retail
investors
SRI indices
AODP
Sustainable
Stock
Exchanges
Initiative
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
INSURANCE
INVESTMENTS
INDUSTRY
PUBLIC/
PRIVATE
KEY
ACTIVITY
SOURCES
OF CAPITAL
INDUSTRY
SPECIFIC
TRANSPARENCY
INITIATIVES
Asset
Management
Both public
and private
Investment
analysts and
specialists
who manage
portfolios
on behalf of
clients
Mainly
institutional
investors like
government,
pension
funds,
companies,
individuals
through
collective
product
offerings
Growing
number of
initiatives
calling on asset
managers to
reveal their
ESG criteria, if
any, and voting
behaviour
Long term
Largely
private
as many
governments
self-insure
Long term
health and
life insurance,
retirement
insurance
and similar
products
Investment of Principles for
Individual and Sustainable
or company
Insurance
contributions
based on
actuarial
models
Short term
Private and
public
Asset
insurance
Cost
recovery and
investment
based on
services
provided
---
1.4 The Leadership Factor
Leadership, whether by government or other actors, such as the NGOs driving
some of the voluntary codes, is critical to the success of all of these initiatives.
Meaningful reporting requires either a pull or a push from government, from
the market or from stakeholders. Some companies focus on compliance while
others focus on reputational risks, peer or consumer pressure. A few set the
pace based on internal values and beliefs. What is clear is that the frameworks
17
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
and methodologies must be relevant and targeted to ensure that the
reporting leads to accountability, transparency and behaviour change where it
is required.
1.5 Current State of Reporting in the Financial
Sector
There is a commonly held public perception that reporting by the Financial
Sector is inadequate and not adequately focused on material issues such that
their primary impact is on funding or investing rather than in their operations.
This has led to a signiicant growth in issue-speciic or activity-speciic
reporting frameworks such as those required by Development Finance
Institutions (DFIs)10 when on-lending to commercial or regional banks. Banks,
as borrowers from DFIs, are confronted with numerous frameworks against
which they must report and have frequently called for the harmonisation of
frameworks and practices for reporting to the sources of capital and other
key stakeholders in order to improve the quality of the reporting and reduce
administrative costs – which get passed on to bank clients.
Issue-speciic approaches to drive transparency, such as the Asset Owners
Disclosure Project, or others that cover institutional investors such as the PRI
transparency framework, tend to target certain parts of the inancial sector –
speciically long-term investors who wield the most inluence in the view of
the stakeholders involved in devising the systems. Many of these frameworks
are voluntary and limited in what is reported. Some are focused on, for
example, carbon emissions. The only real sanctions they can apply if reporting
is incomplete or inadequate, is for a company not to appear in the leadership
or investment ranking. In most cases companies have to opt in voluntarily or
as a result of association membership, to speciically join each initiative. Few
of these initiatives on their own provide a complete picture of the reporting
organization’s sustainability based on all material environmental, social and
governance (ESG) factors.
There is little hard, independent, global data on the state of sustainability
reporting by this signiicant sector. This report has therefore drawn statistics
10 IFC Performance Standards are the most commonly used standards for performance in key environmental and
social activities and have been adopted, and sometimes adapted by many DFIs, along with the Exclusions lists, which
set out those activities or sectors in which the IFC or any of the DFIs are unwilling to participate. Each DFI, including
the IFC, then requires borrowing institutions to report on their performance in the use of the borrowed funds, how
the appropriate performance standards have been applied, etc. Commercial banks with lines of credit with several
banks can ind themselves reporting in multiple formats.
http://www.norfund.no/a-responsible-investor/environment-and-social-standards-article516-454.html
http://www.edi.be/news/news/31-iis-harmonization-initiative.html
18
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
from a KPMG 2015 report11 and from the GRI database12 for the period 20132015 as a proxy. In its survey of global trends in CR reporting, KPMG reports that
among the 100 companies it surveyed, 17% were classiied as inancial services
sector companies using the International Classiication Benchmark System.
The next largest sector, for example, was the technology, media and telecoms
sector which represented 10% of those surveyed. The GRI data reveals that
inancial sector companies produce a signiicant number of the sustainability
reports in the database. However, without further research, no insights can be
drawn about the quality or comprehensive nature of the reports produced as
the data does not give granularity regarding the subsectors producing the
reports and whether these provide information and analysis on key issues.
Nor is there a comprehensive understanding that would indicate whether the
number of reports simply relects a larger sector with many more potential
reporters (i.e. the industry is large) or whether there are more reporters within
the industry report on sustainability issues than the comparative percentage
for other sectors. Data about assurance is available in the GRI database, but
does not provide a view on whether the assurance covers all indicators or not
and experience indicates that in most instances it does not cover all aspects
because of the cost and complexity of providing such wide-ranging experience.
Nor can conclusions be drawn about whether the quantum of reports relects
comprehensive coverage of the sector. The data includes reports that use
the GRI standards (G3, G3.1 and G4), reports that make reference to GRI as
well as other sustainability or integrated reports, which have come to the GRI’s
attention. No sub-categorization is made within the inancial sector, so it is not
clear what percentage of the reports are produced by subsectors such as asset
managers, banks or insurance companies nor what portfolio related indicators
are covered. As can be seen from Figure 1, the geographic spread of reports
brought to the attention of the GRI have a somewhat uneven geographic
spread.
11 www.kpmg.com/crreporting page 45
12 GRI database 2 November 2015, the database is regularly updated.
19
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
20
FIGURE 1
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTS PER REGION
FIGURE 2
REPORTS PER SECTOR, G4 (LATEST STANDARD)
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
21
FIGURE 3
REPORTS PER SECTOR, G3/3.1 (EARLIER GUIDELINES)
FIGURE 4
COMPARISON OF SECTOR REPRESENTATION OF GRI REPORTS
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
2. Findings and Recommendations
The following indings and recommendations are drawn from the analysis of
national and international initiatives and policies that can be found in chapters
3, 4, and 5 of this publication, and in particular from the case studies of GoF47
countries.
2.1. Key Findings
1. The Financial Sector is a key enabler
i. The inancial services industry is diverse and complex, encompassing
several industries or subsectors, such as retail and commercial
lending, development inance, insurance, long-term savings and asset
management, each of which plays an important but different role in
providing the services required for a successful global economy.
ii. The breadth of the sector and the diverse understanding of
“sustainability reporting” make it dificult to apply a single framework and
to achieve the same level of depth in the outcomes across the sector.
iii. Speciic subsectors would therefore play somewhat different roles in
promoting or delivering transparency and disclosure with the ultimate
goal of promoting sustainable development.
iv. Little evidence could be found of meaningful sanctions for poor
quality reporting or failure to meet legal, regulatory or even voluntary
standards set for disclosure.
v. The regulatory focus appears to be on long-term investors, such as
pension funds and asset managers, to include ESG factors into their
decision-making. In addition, development inanciers are required to
report on their ESG considerations by their providers of capital (mostly
governments individually or collectively through institutions such as the
World Bank or the International Finance Corporation).
vi. Promoting transparency and disclosure in order to achieve a more
sustainable global economy will require more targeted and detailed
disclosure on key issues relevant to each subsector. However, crossindustry common disclosures on a number of limited issues is possible
and in many cases desirable.
vii. The understanding of sustainable development and corporate social
responsibility varies between different parts of the industry, institutions
and organizations.
viii. It is unlikely that a single approach would work in all countries and
for all parts of this diverse industry but that does not negate the need
22
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
to strive towards focus and some measure of comparability to enable
decision-makers to assess the success and relevance of the initiatives as
part of a continual improvement process.
ix. Both the quality and quantity of the reports require attention and
there is a need for frequent independent research.
x. The relative success of the privately driven issue speciic or sub-sector
speciic transparency initiatives, such as the CDP and the Asset Owners
Disclosure Project (AODP), points to one way to gain momentum in
promoting transparency. The success of such initiatives lies in providing
positive proiles for leaders and potential reputational impact for
laggards. These initiatives are more successful when stakeholders such as
governments, industry bodies and opinion formers encourage, promote
and support their use.
2. Impacts and contributions at product and service level
i. While some global universal inancial sector companies do have an
operational footprint - particularly in energy consumption related to data
transfer and the footprint of their retail branches - the multiplier effect
is generally created when they extend products and services into the
market.
ii. More meaningful measures and metrics are needed to provide a
barometer of the impact of the inancial services sector up and down
the value chain. However, the complexity of these should not be
underestimated.
iii. Transparency does not fully extend to products and services across
the sector nor does it fully incorporate the consequences, impacts or
outcomes of inancial sector practice. While a bank may provide ‘green
inancing’ for renewable energy, it may also, for example, provide
traditional inancing to heavy impact sectors. Asset managers may be
able to account for the assets under management (AUM) which track
sustainability reporting indices.
3. Common policy observations
i. Governments seeking to institute new policy measures on disclosure
about sustainability issues within the inancial sector should consider
involving the numerous intergovernmental departments (such as inancial
regulators, trade and industry departments and others involved in key
aspects of sustainability such as social and environmental areas). The
supervision of the sector is usually under the remit of the ministries of
inance or the treasury.
ii. International sector regulatory bodies, such as the Basel Committee
have a role to play in the sector’s evaluation and reporting of risk and
23
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
reporting mechanisms.
iii. Many countries appear to have started with a mix of voluntary and
mandatory approaches, and with a mix of drivers from both the public
and private sectors as illustrated by the initiatives in France, Brazil and
South Africa, for example (see chapter 4).
iv. Both rules based and principles based requirements exist.
v. Principles based and “comply or explain”13 requirements currently
appear to enjoy greater prominence in that this is part of the GRI G4
guidelines, the International Integrated Reporting Framework and various
codes and stock exchanges driving transparency. It is also an inherent
part of the French law.
vi. The inancial sector as a whole is governed under complex and
divergent laws and regulations as well as soft law. It typically reports via a
variety of ministries and/or the treasury. Commercial banks, for example,
could report to departments that deal with company legislation,
credit regulators, as well as to central banks, which take their cue from
national monetary policy and committees such as the Basel Committee.
Commercial banks may in addition be governed under companies’
acts or codes as well as stock exchange regulations if they are listed
companies. Commercial banks that borrow money internationally could
also be contractually bound to comply with ESG requirements that are
conditions precedent for being granted loans by multilateral banks
and development inance institutions that are focused on sustainable
development.
4. Limitations of transparency
i. Transparency serves many purposes: it enables but does not
necessarily lead to sustainable development.
ii. Transparency has not always driven better performance. To be fully
transparent both process and outcomes (or impact) should be reported.
iii. The strength of many voluntary reporting frameworks, such as the
CDP and the AODP, is that they are accompanied by independent critical
annual analytical reviews, which are publicly available and drive both
better reporting and performance improvements.
5. Voluntary initiatives can play a key role
i. Research shows that a signiicant number of private sector and NGOled initiatives are being widely used to promote issue-speciic disclosure,
particularly within the climate change arena.
13 The “Comply or Explain” principle is often also referred to as “Report or Explain” or “Apply or Explain”.
24
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ii. Voluntary reporting frameworks provide important market-driven
motivators to the corporate sector as evidenced by the signiicant growth
in reporting to the UN Global Compact, CDP and the growing, global use
of reporting frameworks (such as the GRI’s) by major corporations even
where no reporting requirement has been introduced by the government.
As such, they assist in building reporting skills and the development of
indicators and reporting methodologies. However, they do not have the
capacity to achieve the uptake of sustainability reporting at scale and
across all of the key indicators on their own.
iii. Voluntary frameworks harness the signiicant expertise of the nongovernmental sector in building the measures and indicators most
relevant to critical subsectors.
iv. Broader coverage of the sector can be achieved by combining
voluntary initiatives and market-based instruments with regulation.
6. Voluntary initiatives can serve as inspiration and provide
opportunities
i. Building on existing voluntary initiatives could provide governments
with fast improvements in terms of building credible and enabling
environments for disclosure and thereby harness the signiicant work
of experts that has already been incorporated into these voluntary
frameworks.
ii. Opportunities exist for the GoF47 to coordinate engagement
with voluntary initiatives to create greater alignment of goals and
methodologies and advance in the harmonisation of reporting
frameworks for the inancial sector that meet the needs of all
stakeholders. Reporting on greenhouse gas emissions could provide
an entry point, as this is the environmental area that has reached
the strongest level of maturity in sustainability reporting and is a key
challenge ahead of us as it was unanimously recognised at COP21 and in
the Paris Agreement.14
7. Reporting scope and quality
i. During 2014-15, disclosure on a limited number of issues, such as
climate change, has been driven by a variety of government and nongovernmental factors and now covers signiicant parts of the global
economy – including the inancial sector. Not all aspects of sustainable
development are equally covered.
ii. Stimulating academic research into coverage and quality of
transparency and sustainability reporting by the sector would be useful to
14 http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
25
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
determine whether it is below the international average.
2.2. Key Recommendations for the GoF47
1. Disseminate the lessons learned from countries which have already
implemented policies for inancial sector disclosure and which have
undertaken analysis of the success (or lack of success) in increasing
meaningful disclosure.
2. Work with the relevant stakeholders (reporting framework developers,
stock exchanges, industry associations, business leaders, civil society
organizations, etc.) to identify the most critical reporting needs and
promote stronger alignment of guidance tools for sustainability
disclosure that can be applied or adapted by countries or ministries –
building on those that currently exist, including single issue voluntary
frameworks.
3. Endorse the use of the GoF47 Framework for Policy Evaluation as a
tool for use by countries and regulators to promote improved regulation
and requirements.
2.3 Recommendations for Policy Makers
1. Secure political champions in appropriate government departments
that regulate or supervise the inancial services sector.
2. Establish public sector leadership and set the example by regulating
the disclosures by state-owned inancial sector companies to improve
disclosure, governance and accountability in the disbursement of tax
revenues.
3. Create, support and harness the power of public-private partnerships
to drive improvement in the reporting frameworks and analytical review
of results.
4. Progression from voluntary to mandatory reporting requirements
should be considered once the instruments are tested and reporting
systems have been built up to ensure that the reports create a pull /push
effect for improved performance.
5. Reward and recognise front-runners.
6. Set longer-term goals, milestones and minimum expectations for
reporting by the inancial sector (or key subsectors) to move from creating
a reporting requirement to ensuring that it remains current, relevant and
delivers the changes in performance and behaviour that is required.
7. Consider working with the numerous private sector and NGO
initiatives such as the World Federation of Stock Exchanges, the Asset
Owners Disclosure Project, the Carbon Disclosure Project, the Global
26
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Compact, the Global Reporting Initiative and the Integrated Reporting
Council, etc., to build on the methodological work already undertaken for
the development of it-for-purpose reporting frameworks for the different
subsectors of the inancial services industry to close the gap between
market-relevant information and the broader sustainability reporting
guidelines.
27
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
3. Finance Sector Speciic
International Initiatives
3.1 Addis Ababa Action Agreement
Finance is regarded as the mainstay for achieving the new 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development, including the 17 Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs), adopted by world leaders in New York during September 2015.
The SDGs have been developed with a holistic approach to address global
priorities across all the pillars of sustainable development, including ending
poverty and hunger, reducing social inequality, tackling climate change, and
preserving the planet’s natural resources.
More than 100 concrete measures are deined in the Addis Ababa Action
Agenda (AAAA). It addresses all sources of inance, and covers cooperation
on a range of issues including technology, science, innovation, trade and
capacity building.
The AAAA also stresses the necessity of aligning private investment with
sustainable development, coupled with public policies and regulatory
frameworks that provide the appropriate incentives. The international
community also agreed on a new mechanism to facilitate inancing for new
technologies in developing countries.15
The agreement includes:
• Technology Facilitation to improve collaboration among governments,
private sector, civil society, the scientiic community, United Nations
entities and other stakeholders;
• A Global Infrastructure Forum to address infrastructure gaps and
highlight opportunities for investment and cooperation on projects that
are environmentally, socially and economically sustainable;
• New social compact and social protection systems supporting the
poor and vulnerable;
• Taxing harmful substances to discourage consumption and increase
revenue;
15 http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/ffd3/press-release/countries-reach-historic-agreement.html
28
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
• Promoting affordable and stable access to credit for micro, small and
medium-sized enterprises, implementing a global strategy for youth
employment and the International Labour Organization Global Jobs Pact
by 2020;
•
Achieving the goal of 0.7% of gross national income for foreign aid;
• Strengthening least developed countries through inancial and
technical support;
•
Strengthening international cooperation in tax matters;
• Mobilizing US$100 billion per year by 2020 to combat climate change
and to phase out ineficient fossil fuel subsidies.16
The agreement acknowledges the important role of corporate sustainability
reporting to reach the global objectives:
• As a means to ensure corporate transparency and accountability in
support of a behavioural change towards sustainable consumption and
production patterns that protect ecosystems.
• As an integral component of the sustainable corporate practices that
are needed to foster well-functioning domestic and international private
business and inance, along with the integration of ESG issues into core
business models and impact investing.
The AAAA recognises the need for “transparent methodologies for reporting
climate inance” (AAAA, paragraph 6017 of the Outcome document).
The measures emphasized in the AAAA are in line with the recommendations
set by the GoF47 in its publication Evaluating National Policies on Corporate
Sustainability Reporting. The Agenda promotes sustainable corporate
practices, including integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
factors into company reporting as appropriate, to help ensure transparency
and accountability. It leaves space for countries to decide on the appropriate
balance of voluntary and mandatory rules18. Furthermore, it recognizes the
need for transparent methodologies for climate inance reporting.
16 http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/ffd3/press-release/countries-reach-historic-agreement.html
17 http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/AAAA_Outcome.pdf
18 Recommendation n° 5 of Evaluating National Policies on Corporate Sustainability Reporting: “Consider a
combination of mandatory and voluntary measures”.
29
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
3.2 The Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable
Financial System
The Inquiry19 was initiated by UN Environment with a mandate to explore
and advance policy options to align the inancial system with sustainable
development, with the objective of increasing the effectiveness of mobilizing
capital towards a green and inclusive economy.
In its 2015 report, The Financial System We Need, the Inquiry looked at the
realignment the global inancial system would require, following the 2008
global inancial crisis, to become stable and sustainable.
The Inquiry concluded that a “quiet revolution” is already happening as policy
makers and inancial regulators take action to build strong and sustainable
inancial systems for the needs of the 21st century. The report argues that
concepts such as natural wealth and the circular, green economy have moved
from the margins to become the substance of economic strategies and
policies for businesses and nations.
The Inquiry’s indings and proposals indicate that the inancial system can be
transformed to better serve the needs of sustainable development. Moreover,
such a transformation is essentially a matter of public choice – one that is
being made in an increasing number of countries and across a growing
portion of the inancial system.
Signiicantly, for the GoF47, the Inquiry considers aspects of inancial and
monetary policies and inancial regulations, as well as standards, including
disclosure requirements, credit ratings, listing requirements and indices.
The Inquiry also focuses on the number of different rule makers for the
inancial sector and their roles. They include central banks, inancial
regulators, inance ministries, other government departments, standards
institutions, and market-based standard-setters such as stock exchanges, and
key international organizations and platforms.
3.3 Financial Stability Board Task Force on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) coordinates the work of international
19 www.unep.org/inquiry
30
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
standard-setting bodies and national inancial authorities in the elaboration of
inancial sector policies that strengthen inancial stability through regulation
and supervision, among others. It fosters a level playing ield by encouraging
coherent implementation of these policies across sectors and jurisdictions.20
Risks related to climate change are expected to increase in the coming years
and the manner in which they are managed will depend, among others, on
public and private stakeholders’ capacity to access high quality sustainability
information.21 The FSB therefore received a mandate from the G20 to work
with organisations from the public and private spheres to assess how annual
reporting by inancial institutions can integrate climate-related issues. The
FSB established the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures in
December 2015 with a work plan in two phases:
• Phase I: Determining the deinition and level of ambition of eficient
and effective disclosure on climate-related physical, liability and
transition risks, taking into account the information needs of users of this
information for investment, credit, and insurance underwriting decisions.
To this end, the Task Force issued a irst report in March 2016 including a
set of fundamental principles of disclosure. This irst deliverable presents
a framework and guidance for the recommendations that will emerge
from the second phase of the Task Force’s work.
• Phase II: Elaborating recommendations and guidelines for
“consistent, comparable, reliable, clear and eficient”22 voluntary
corporate disclosures in the area of climate-related risks, to be delivered
in a inal report at the end of 2016.
Task Force members include private providers of capital, issuers, rating
agencies and accounting irms.23 Throughout its activities, the Task Force
seeks to engage with a diverse range of stakeholders (including companies,
public sector representatives, non-proit organisations and academia) and to
conduct public consultations.
Fundamental Principles for Effective Climate-Related
Disclosures
As indicated above, the irst phase of the Task Force’s work has determined
seven fundamental principles:
20 http://www.fsb.org/about/
21 https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/bloomberg-to-head-climate-risk-taskforce-to-bring-greatertransparency-for-investors/
22 https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Phase_I_Report_v15.pdf
23 https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Phase_I_Report_v15.pdf
31
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
1. Present relevant information;
2. Be speciic and complete;
3. Be clear, balanced, and understandable;
4. Be consistent over time;
5. Be comparable among companies within a sector, industry, or
portfolio;
6. Be reliable, veriiable, and objective; and
7. Be provided on a timely basis.24
Terms of Reference for Phase II
In order to set out recommendations for voluntary climate-related disclosures
in inancial reports, the second phase of the Task Force’s mandate will be
based on the fundamental principles above and will focus on the inancial
impact of climate change on companies’ businesses. Overall, good
governance processes should ensure the quality of disclosures, which
should be as speciic and complete as possible in informing about the
material impacts of climate change on the company’s operations and its risk
management strategy.25
3.4 UNEP Finance Initiative
The UNEP Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) is a global partnership between UN
Environment and the inancial sector. More than 200 inancial institutions,
including banks, fund managers and insurance irms, work with UN
Environment to understand and analyse the effects of environmental and
social issues on organizations’ inancial performance. UNEP FI’s work is
conducted through commissions on banking, insurance and investment and
working groups on thematic issues. UNEP FI has played a signiicant role in
mobilizing inance for renewable energy and energy eficiency and in focusing
the property development sector on green buildings thereby increasing
energy eficiency and lowering carbon emissions from the commercial
environment. While it does not have a unique, mandatory reporting
requirement, it strongly promotes best practice disclosure relevant to the
sector.
A number of initiatives have stemmed from UNEP FI, including the Principles
for Responsible Investment and the Equator Principles, which is now an
24 https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Phase_I_Report_v15.pdf
25 https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Phase_I_Report_v15.pdf
32
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
independent member-driven organization that operates on a voluntary basis.
3.5 Principles for Responsible Investment
The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI)26 were created in 2006 under
the auspices of the UNEP Finance Initiative and the UN Global Compact and
supported by the Government of Switzerland, amongst others. There are
1,48127 signatories with more than US$59 trillion in assets under management
who have signed the six principles.
Signatories are institutional investors, who recognize a duty to act in the
long-term interests of their beneiciaries and that ESG issues can affect the
performance of investment portfolios.
The principles can be summarized as:
1. Incorporating ESG issues into investment analysis and decisionmaking processes
2. Active ownership and incorporation of ESG into ownership policies
and practices
3. Seek disclosure of ESG issues by the investees
4. Promotion of the Principles within the investment industry
5. Collaboration to enhance investors’ effectiveness in implementing the
Principles
6. Reporting on investors’ activities and progress towards implementing
the Principles
In its 2015-2018 strategic plan the PRI highlights the redevelopment of its
reporting framework. It currently holds 800 transparency reports on its websites.
These are reports against a PRI template with a series of YES/NO and multiplechoice questions speciically related to the investment and voting processes
that asset managers employ. Environmental, social and governance issues
addressed under the framework deal with demographics, national resource
constraints, externalities, climate change, inequality, human rights and
corruption.
An opportunity exists for the GoF47 to work with the PRI in the
redevelopment of its reporting framework to create greater alignment of
goals and methodologies.
26 www.unpri.org
27 As of February 2016
33
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
3.6 Conclusion
The current focus on the inancial sector through speciic international
initiatives, including of intergovernmental nature, provides an opportunity
for policy makers to introduce or strengthen their national initiatives. This
increased awareness could be used to drive transparency, disclosure and
behavioural change in the sector with a view to achieving sustainable
development goals and addressing key global challenges.
34
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
4. National Case Studies from
GoF47 countries
4.1 Legal Requirements for Sustainability
Reporting: The Colombian and French
Examples
The laws analysed in this chapter were developed in very different contexts
and both set a national precedent in sustainability reporting of inancial
institutions. In France, Article 173 of the Energy Transition for Green Growth
Law28 built upon the existing requirements introduced by Articles 224 and
225 of the Law on National Commitment for the Environment29. Article 224
emerged from a background of several soft law instruments that promote
socially responsible investment (SRI) and sustainability reporting to a minor
extent, whereas, in Colombia, Article 96 of the Law 1328 of 2009 was the irst
legislative instrument applying to inancial institutions.
COLOMBIA: A CORNERSTONE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
IN LATIN AMERICA30
Before 2009, disclosure of social and environmental issues was a wellestablished practice among a number of Colombian inancial institutions,
which voluntarily followed international standards, despite the absence
of formal requirements. The introduction of Article 96 of Law 1328 in 2009
constituted a milestone in the development of instruments that promoted
transparency in the inancial sector.
Since the adoption of Law 132831 of 2009, which opened up the Colombian
insurance market to liberalization and in Article 96 introduced a voluntary
requirement to report, two new instruments that increase disclosure of ESG
28 Law no 2015-992 of 17th August 2015
29 Law no 2010-788 of 12th July 2010
30 http://www.unep.org/resourceeficiency/Business/SustainableandResponsibleBusiness/
CorporateSustainabilityReporting/GroupofFriendsofParagraph47/PoliciesandInitiatives/PolicyUpdates
31 ARTICLE 96. “In order to promote the adoption and voluntary development of social responsibility activities by
the inancial, insurance and stock market system, the programme of social balance is hereby created as a business
management tool that serves to disclose the impact said activities have on the Colombian population.
To this end, the National Government, within a maximum period of six (6) months from the enactment of this law,
will deine how the aforementioned entities comply with the duty to report, at least once per year, on the different
programmes which they implement in Colombia according to their corporate governance policies to serve the
underprivileged.”
35
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
aspects as a transversal approach have emerged: the Code of Best Corporate
Practices of Colombia, or Country Code (Código País), and the Issuer
Institutions Recognition IR (Reconocimiento IR). The Country Code compiles
recommendations for best practices in corporate governance for issuers both
in the real economy and the inancial sector. It was established in 2014 by the
inancial regulator, the Financial Superintendent (Superintendencia Financiera
de Colombia), and applies to investors, issuers, infrastructure providers and
supervisors. Those entities that agree to comply with the code disclose the
adoption of its recommendations through an implementation report that
is available to the public. These reports must address the availability of
information: “(i) Is the website of the company user-friendly, so it is easy to
access information associated or related to corporate governance? (32.2)”;
“(ii) In this regard, does the website of the company include at least the
following links on sustainability: corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies,
relations with stakeholders and the community, environment, etc. (32.3)”.
Another instrument serving as a tool to increase transparency of inancial
institutions is the Issuer Institutions Recognition (IR). Awarded by the
Colombian Stock Exchange (BVC – Bolsa de Valores de Colombia), any issuer
applying for recognition has to adopt the requirements contained in the
Circular of the BVC. Among other provisions, issuers are required to publish
a sustainability report and make it available on the company’s website32, or
publish information on its CSR practices in a separate document or dedicated
section of the company’s website. Additionally, only those companies with the
IR recognition that belong to the equity index COLEQTY can be part of the
COLIR index, a unique index that highlights issuers’ commitments to investor
relations and sustainability disclosure33.
FRANCE AND ITS EARLY STEPS IN PROMOTING TRANSPARENCY
REQUIREMENTS
France is one of the few countries that promulgated laws promoting ESG
disclosure in inancial institutions in the early 2000s. Two laws requiring
disclosure on a “comply or explain” basis were created in 2001:
• Law 2001-152 of 19 February on the generalization of employee
savings plans; and
32 Circular Unica de Bolsa de Valores de Colombia: https://www.bvc.com.co/pps/tibco/portalbvc/Home/Regulacion/
Sistemas_Administrados/Renta_Variable?com.tibco.ps.pagesvc.action=updateRenderState&rp.currentDocumentID
=5d9e2b27_11de9ed172b_-2c0b7f000001&rp.revisionNumber=1&rp.attachmentPropertyName=Attachment&com.
tibco.ps.pagesvc.targetPage=1f9a1c33_132040fa022_-78750a0a600b&com.tibco.ps.pagesvc.mode=resource&rp.redi
rectPage=1f9a1c33_132040fa022_-787e0a0a600b
33 http://www.bvc.com.co/pps/tibco/portalbvc/Home/Empresas/IR/Indice_COLIR?action=dummy
36
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
•
Law 2001-624 of 17 July establishing the Pension Reserve Fund (FRR).
The law on the generalization of employee savings plans aimed at the
diversiication of investments and the development of employee share
ownership, but also at encouraging the orientation of savings towards a
more inclusive (or solidarity-based) economic model. With this law, company
collective investment funds should specify in their bylaws “the social,
environmental and ethical considerations their asset managers must respect,
if necessary, when buying and selling securities, as well as the exercise of
rights attached to them”. The second legislation, Law 2001-624 of 17 July,
encourages, if not requires (in fact, the two versions are possible given the
way the law is phrased), FRR’s Management Board to regularly report its
investment policy orientation to the Supervisory Board, including how social,
environmental and ethical considerations are integrated in the general
guidelines of the fund’s investment policy.
Nevertheless, it was not until 2003 that the irst legislation increasing
transparency for funds, in particular Undertakings for Collective Investment in
Transferable Securities (UCITS), was passed. Article 66 of the Law on Financial
Security (Law 2003-706 of August 2003) created the obligation for portfolio
managers to report on how voting rights of shares held in their UCITS were
exercised34. This obligation has been promoted by the French Association of
Financial Management (AFG). In case such voting rights were not exercised,
the reasons had to be duly explained. The reporting conditions were to be
set by the Financial Markets Authority (AMF) within its General Regulation.
They were complemented in 2005 by its Directive N° 2005-05 on UCITS of
employee savings funds in its articles 19 and 20 for SRI occupational collective
investment funds including in their bylaws a provision on the asset manager’s
respect of environmental, social or ethical considerations when buying or
selling securities and when exercising the voting rights attached. These funds
were required to include in their annual reports a detailed speciication of the
selection criteria used in the analysis of social, environmental or ethical issues,
their evaluation method, and to inform if their asset management company
had referred to specialized third-party rating agencies35.
The government has not been the only stakeholder engaged in promoting
transparency and reporting. The private sector also had a positive impact
by developing and using a variety of labels, codes and charters. Prior to the
enactment of the Law on National Commitment for the Environment, the
34 corporate.indlaw.com/litigation-disputes/recent-law-on-inancial-security-improves-corporate-governance-in.html
35 Instruction N° 2005-05 du 25 Janvier 2005: Relative Aux OPCVM d’épargne salariale. Retrieved from www.afg.
asso.fr/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=2290&Itemid=143&lang=fr
37
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
market already introduced three labels, respectively launched in 1997, 2002
and 2009:
•
The FINANSOL label for solidarity savings products;
• The Inter-Union Committee of Employee Savings (CIES) Label for
employee savings funds; and
• The SRI Label of Novethic36 awarded to SRI funds that systematically
integrate environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria.
Likewise, inluential organizations of the inancial sector were providing
tools to improve disclosure and developing charters to lead by example. In
particular, the AFG and the Forum for Responsible Investment (FIR) published
the irst edition of the AFG-FIR Transparency Code in 2010. The Code is
a translation of the Eurosif Transparency Code for Retail Funds, contains
guidelines for reporting on ESG investment criteria, the ESG analysis process,
the evaluation and selection of the investment policy and the voting and
engagement policy.
4.1.1 Colombia
Policy Evolution
The Law 1328 of 2009 made provisions for consumer protection, the multifund scheme for private pension funds and the implementation of the
insurance free trade agreement with the United States.
The legal process in Colombia takes several steps before a law is passed and
includes a provision for civil society to bring issues to the law making process
if they achieve a critical number of signatures to a petition. Law 1328 is part of
the Colombian inancial legislation.
The inclusion of Article 96 in Law 1328 was the result of detailed research
followed by consultation with experts, stakeholders, public participation
and an extensive parliamentary process. This law sought to standardize the
methods of implementing and reporting on CSR programmes for companies
affected by Law 1328.
Policy Design
Article 96 of Law 1328 of 2009 has the objective of raising awareness of the
36 Novethic is a research center for SRI and CSR.
38
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
corporate social responsibility programmes being conducted by companies
from the inancial and insurance sector and the securities market37. It requires
the creation of a social balance programme to be used as a business
management tool that serves to spread the impact of CSR activities across the
Colombian population.
Its implementation decree is meant to provide a standard that establishes
the broad parameters for presentation and disclosure to inform the public
about social balance programmes. In order to fulil this purpose, it establishes
the conditions for disclosure and the content of the reported information.
The inancial institution has to disclose the requested information at least
once a year (during the irst quarter) in a way that is clear, complete and
understandable for the general audience. Dissemination must be done
through the popular media such as the internet and newspapers.
The information disclosed must include at least the following details:
1. Description of the social programme(s) implemented by the entity and
name of the programmes;
2. Brief description of the activities, indicating the beneiciary sectors;
3. Date of completion of the programme activities;
4. Period covered by the information.
The content reported must correspond to programmes that were ongoing
during the year preceding the disclosure and/or those that were being
developed at the time the report is written, those that are progressing but not
yet complete and those of an ongoing nature. Moreover, inancial institutions
may associate with each other to undertake the disclosure requirements or
resort to their partnerships or inancial conglomerates.
Even though the decree does not include penalties, the Financial
Superintendent has sanctioning powers when there is evidence that inancial
institutions are not complying with the disclosure requirements and the
publication of CSR programmes.
37 More speciically: credit institutions; trusts; warehouses; pension fund managers and severance; entities managing
average premium funds; insurance companies; insurance cooperatives; reinsurance companies; capitalization
companies; professional risk managers; insurance brokers and reinsurance; exchange brokerage companies and
special inancial services; central bank; representative ofices of inancial institutions, reinsurers and market entities
abroad; stock exchanges and brokers; goods and agricultural, agro-industrial products and other ‘commodities’
stock exchange, their brokers and entities performing clearing and settlement of transactions carried out through
them; central securities depositories; entities managing trading systems; entities managing clearing and settlement
systems; counterparty risk entities; investment management companies; risk rating agencies; securitization
companies; administration entities who own trading systems and forex and societies managing forex regarding
clearing and liquidation.
39
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Policy Monitoring
Although the regulation does not require the use of a particular reporting
channel, inancial institutions have been using sustainability reports and/
or annual reports with a special section on CSR activities to communicate
the information. In addition, while the policy requires disclosure of the
programmes implemented to serve the poorest sectors of society, inancial
institutions have included in their reporting information on other programmes
covering, inter alia, environmental issues and/or human rights.
Before Article 96 of Law 1328 entered into force, some inancial institutions,
and particularly the largest (among them NYSE listed institutions), were
developing CSR programmes and presenting them in sustainability reports
in order to implement the highest international standards in this ield. These
were mostly based on the GRI’s guidelines for the Preparation of Sustainability
Reports and the ISO26000 Guidance on Social Responsibility.
So far, there are no studies or concrete evidence that are able to quantify
the inluence of the law in increasing the rate of sustainability reporting
and enhancing its quality. However, in order to establish whether inancial
institutions were compliant with the rule (speciically as it relates to the
publication of a report), the inancial authorities conducted a checklist of
204 inancial institutions in 2014. These institutions included banks, inance
companies, inancial corporations, insurance companies, trust companies,
managers of pensions and severance funds, and stock brokerage irms. The
study found that 88% of the institutions published the CSR or annual report
on their website and complied with the recommendations on the minimum
content to be reported.
In addition, the regulator found that the law has had a positive and very
effective impact in the banking sector, which had been working to establish
CSR policies and to prepare their reports following the conditions prescribed.
Policy establishment is supported by the creation in 2011 of the Social
Sustainability Committee of Asobancaria, Colombia’s banking association.
The committee consists of 28 inancial entities and has as main objectives
the promotion of green products, eco-eficiency and ARAS (Environmental
and Social Risk Analysis). In addition, Asobancaria has also set up a “Green
Protocol”. Sixteen Colombian banks have signed the Green Protocol, and
have developed credit lines that aim to encourage and support projects with
social and environmental beneits.
While the law is consistent with most international standards that inancial
40
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
institutions already followed before its promulgation in 2009, there are still
some aspects in which inancial institutions need to progress. These relate
mainly to clarity and accessibility of information to the public.
Conclusion
Laws can provide an important stimulation of better practice, particularly
when supported by relevant industry associations or market forces.
Good sustainability reporting is built over time as practices, systems and
methodologies mature.
4.1.2 France
Policy Evolution
Article 224 of the Law on National Commitment for the Environment (Law
2010-788 dated 12 July 2010) emerged from a structured process that
gathered participants of the private and public sector, as well as unions and
NGO’s. This article requires asset managers to disclose how they consider
ESG criteria in their investment strategies (notably regarding the management
of their UCITS funds).
The consultation process of the law started in July 2007 and was programmed
to go through ive stages. In the irst stage, which consisted of a dialogue
to identify and elaborate proposals, working groups composed of state
representatives, local authorities, employers and employees represented
through unions, and NGOs participated in workshops to discuss topics of
concern and propose programmes and actions for implementation. These
were later submitted for public consultation.
SRI and sustainability reporting issues were not addressed in depth in the
context of the working groups. The debates focused mainly on the possibility
of strengthening the sustainability reporting requirements of the Law on
New Economic Regulations (Loi NRE)38 of 2001, and on increasing the scope
of targeted companies. At that time, SRI was still a niche topic and several
actors did not have the expertise to contribute to the debate. However, the
few comments and proposals made on SRI, such as its development through
employee savings plans; the creation of promotional campaigns in favour of
SRI; and a green certiicate based on SRI investments volumes, were strong
38 The NRE law required in its Article 116 mandatory reporting to listed companies.
41
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
enough to form the base for Commitment 20439 on SRI promotion40.
The operational committee N° 25 “Business and CSR” was in charge of
discussing Commitment 204. This time, institutions specialized in CSR and
SRI, and inancial sector associations and federations were invited to the
discussion41. The operational committee came up with two sets of proposals
to promote SRI. The irst set addressed SRI promotion through information
campaigns and was motivated by the signiicant growth of the SRI market,
the low promotion of SRI products by bank branches and insurance
brokers, and consequently the lack of trust by individuals to invest in SRI
products. It resulted in Article 53 of the secondary legislation regulating the
implementation of the Law on National Commitment for the Environment
(2009-967 dated 3 August 2009). Article 53 stipulates that SRI should be
encouraged through incentives and information campaigns. This resulted
in the creation of “The SRI Week”, an initiative of the French Responsible
Investment Forum (FIR), a founding member of EUROSIF and supported by
the Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea (MEEM) in 2010. The annual
event attracts experts from inancial institutions, associations and universities,
among others, to raise public awareness about all aspects of SRI.42
The second set of proposals included promoting, at the European level,
the need to publish how UCITS managers integrate ESG criteria in their
SRI decisions, and encouraging institutional investors to publish how they
integrate ESG criteria in their investment policies43. The proposals were
motivated by the different voluntary laws that incentivize employee savings
and the role of institutional investors in the promotion of SRI.
THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 224
Article 224 of the Law on National Commitment for the Environment applies
to asset managers and open-ended mutual funds (called SICAV in France).
Although neither the article nor its secondary legislation speciically outline
the objective and do not explicitly mention SRI, the objective was widely
39 “Promoting socially responsible investing through information campaigns and incentive mechanisms (such as
employee savings plans in the NRE Law”, (Workstream N° 25 - Operational Committee “Business & CSR” of the
Grenelle de l’environnement).
40 Construire une démocratie écologique : institutions et gouvernance, synthèse rapport Groupe 5 : http://www.
ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/074000597.pdf
41 Some of the institutions were: CSR Observatoire, FIR AFG, French Banking Federation (FBF), French Federation of
Insurance Companies (FFSA) and French Association of Private Companies(AFEP)
42 MEEM-CGDD. L’investissement socialement responsable pour orienter l’épargne vers la transition écologique. p.
2. November 2014. Retrieved from http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/05_CGDD_ISR_2_p_DEF_
Web.pdf
43 Chantier 25 Comité opérationnel « Entreprises et RSE », Rapport inal - 21 mars 2008 : http://www.
developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_inal_comop_25-2-2.pdf
42
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
addressed in the parliamentary debates44.
The secondary legislation does not include a precise description of the ESG
topics that must be reported.
However, the targeted entities are explicitly deined; the text sets the
reporting requirements at the level of the asset management company (table
2) and their UCITS funds (irst column table 3). For those UCITS that do not
take account of environmental, social and governance criteria simultaneously,
the asset manager must signal it in its reporting.
It is important to highlight that in France the deinition of ESG integration
varies from the approach of EUROSIF and other European countries. Article
224 emphasizes the simultaneous consideration of Environmental, Social and
Governance aspects, whereas in other contexts the consideration of one of
the three pillars sufices. In addition, the secondary legislation speciies the
reporting practical modalities. Information on how the asset management
company takes account of ESG issues at the company level has to be
published on its website. Information on how ESG criteria are taken into
account in the investment strategy of their UCITS has to be published at two
levels: (i) on the company’s website, for each UCITS or by UCITS category and
(ii) in the annual report of each UCITS. The secondary legislation entered into
force on 1st January 2012 and gave companies a timeframe of six months to
publish the information on their websites.
Two aspects were not covered in the secondary legislation: codes or
guidelines and compliance. While there is no reference to a particular
code or guideline, the text states that companies must specify whether the
information is presented following a nationally or internationally recognized
code or guideline. A new version of the AFG-FIR Transparency Code was
published in 2013 in alignment with the new legal disclosure requirements.
The second aspect not covered by the policy is the compliance mechanism
which is assumed to be enforced by the French Market Authority in line with
its duties to supervise the asset management industry and to ensure that
entities are compliant with regulations. There are no penalties or sanctions
for non-compliance. Nevertheless, reporters could positively signal their
compliance through the existing labels in the market, and the adherence to
the AFG-FIR Transparency Code, which is mandatory for all SRI funds that are
open to the public and managed by member companies of either AFG or FIR.
44 Assemblée Nationale. Dispositions Relatives Aux Entreprises et à la Consommation, Article 82, Prise en compte
par les gérants de portefeuille de la logique du développement durable. April 2010. Retrieved from http://www.
assemblee-nationale.fr/13/rapports/r2449-tI.asp
43
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
A PLEASING BUT IMPROVABLE OUTCOME
A small number45 of studies have been conducted to analyse the effectiveness
of Article 224 in terms of disclosure, however, no organization has
progressively analysed all the requirements of the article and their impact on
reporting practices. Nevertheless, assessments have concluded that there is
room for improvement.
The MEEM assessed the policy in October 201346. The results were relatively
satisfactory considering that the law’s secondary legislation had entered
into force only the previous year. However, the disclosure rates in annual
reports were much lower than those on websites. The only requirement that
showed higher disclosure rates in annual reports was the indication that the
UCITS was not SRI. In this case, 15% of the sample complied in the annual
report, while 0% did it on the website. The reason of such low disclosure
rates was attributed to the availability of the information in electronic format.
An assessment of MEEM’s study is provided in the GoF47 report Evaluating
National Policies on Corporate Sustainability Reporting.
The objective of the law is to promote ESG integration by establishing a
limited set of reporting requirements that serve as a basis to encourage asset
managers to factor in ESG issues in their investment strategies and allow a
common framework to better inform clients. According to the Working Group
2 of the CSR Platform - a place for dialogue to address policy implementation
of CSR in France - the impact of the policy in this matter was low and the
target of transparency required was dificult to identify. On one hand, the
provisions applied only to asset managers, which manage around 70% of the
assets from institutional investors, however, the law targeted mainly savings
of retail investors, a considerably lower amount of assets under management
(AUM)47.
On the other hand, the Working Group argued that the disclosed information
was of little interest for retail investors because of its complexity or lack of
relevance. The Working Group provided a series of recommendations to
increase the effectiveness of the law, among them the extension of the scope
45 MEEM (2013), Novethic (2013) and (AFG 2012)
46 http://www.actu-environnement.com/media/pdf/news-25728-etude-cas-france.pdf
47 Extends the reporting scope to insurance and reinsurance companies regulated by the Insurance Code, mutual
insurers and grouping unions subject to the Mutual Code, employee-beneits unions and institutions regulated by
the Code of Social Security, investment companies with variable capital, the Caisse des Depots et Consignations,
supplementary pension institutions subject to the Code of Social Security, supplementary pension institution for
non-permanent staff of the state and other public authorities (IRCANTEC), the public institution managing the
scheme the compulsory supplementary public-service pension scheme (ERAFP) and the state insurance fund for local
government workers (CNRACL)
44
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
to institutional investors, the creation of a SRI label by the government,
the clariication of ESG integration and SRI in the text, and the use of a
more elaborated “comply or explain” approach, among others. The Group
concluded that Article 224, which was specially backed by the AFG-FIR
Transparency Code and the existing labels, led to better reporting practices
by asset managers. Their observations enriched the debate and eventually
generated pressure for the extension of Article 224 to institutional investors.
POLICY EVOLUTION
Article 173 of the Law on Energy Transition for the Green Growth
Article 173 builds upon Article 224, the effects of which have gone beyond
the increase of disclosure by portfolio managers and have opened an
inter-ministerial and global debate to develop new instruments and laws to
improve disclosure by inancial institutions at large. The government-initiated
SRI label (announced in the roadmap of the irst Environmental Conference
held in September 2012), the “Energy and Ecological Transition for Climate”
Label48 (TEEC) (Box a) and the Article 173 of the Law on Energy Transition
for Green Growth49, voted in August 2015, go one step further to improve
transparency in the inancial sector.
The rationale for expanding the scope of the law to institutional investors was
a recommendation not only from the Working Group 2 of the CSR Platform,
but was also proposed in the Drago-Brovelli–Molinié report (2013) and the
White Paper on Financing the Ecological Transition (2013). It was, however,
a recommendation pushed for several years by the French Responsible
Investment Forum (FIR).
The irst attempt to extend the reporting scope to include institutional
investors was made through the Law for Growth, Activity and Equal Economic
Chances. The parliamentary process started in January 2015. Its Article 40
included provisions on ESG reporting in annual reports for “authorized or
regulated institutional investors”. The article made it through the irst debate
at the National Assembly but was later removed by the Senate Commission.
The Law on Energy Transition for Green Growth was adopted on 23rd July
2015 and promulgated on 6th August 2015. Article 173 complements Article
L.533-22-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code by including provisions on
48 The TEEC label was an outcome of the workstreams initiated by the Energy Transition Banking and Financial
Conference held in June 2014
49 Article 173. Energy Transition for Green Growth Law. Retrieved from: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/ta/
ta0575.asp
45
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ESG reporting for institutional investors50 with a focus on climate change.
The law requires institutional investors to disclose how they considered ESG
criteria in their investment strategies as well as how they are consistent with
energy and ecological transition.
POLICY DESIGN
The dynamics in the development process of Article 173 were different to
those of Article 224. Institutional investors are key players in the capital
allocation process and have a critical role to play in the reorientation of
inancial lows in a manner that is consistent with the transition. Being major
clients of asset managers, it was therefore natural to envisage an extension
of previous requirements. Such an extension of Article 224 to institutional
investors had been requested for long by pioneering actors as well as the
French SIF. As an initial step, parliamentarians consulted several experts in
sustainability and climate change disclosure to draft an amendment that
captured the transparency needed from institutional investors; the provisions
had to be aligned with existing reporting requirements. Within the context of
COP21, Article 173 came with a particular focus on climate change through
elements such as the exposure of targeted entities to climate-related risks
as well as an assessment of their contribution to the ight against climate
change (through the use of indicative targets, relective of the domestic and
international climate objectives).
The French Treasury was in charge of drafting the secondary legislation of
Article 173. A irst draft of the secondary legislation together with a guidance
note and a questionnaire was made available for public consultation from
November 27 to December 751.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The secondary legislation of article 173 provides a lexible and nonprescriptive framework for entities to report on how they take account of ESG
(notably climate) criteria.
50 In particular, it extends the reporting scope to insurance and reinsurance companies regulated by the Insurance
Code, mutual insurers and grouping unions subject to the Mutual Code, employee-beneits unions and institutions
regulated by the Code of Social Security, investment companies with variable capital, the Caisse des Depots et
Consignations, supplementary pension institutions subject to the Code of Social Security, supplementary pension
institution for non-permanent staff of the state and other public authorities (IRCANTEC), the public institution
managing the scheme the compulsory supplementary public-service pension scheme (ERAFP) and the state
insurance fund for local government workers (CNRACL).
51 https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/12658_consultation-sur-le-decret-d-application-du-vi-de-larticle-173-de-laloi-relative-a-la-transition-energetique-pour-la-croissance-verte
46
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Table 2 compares the general information on their investment policies that
asset management companies must disclose, following Article 224 of the Law
on National Commitment for the Environment, as well as the information that
institutional investors and asset managers must disclose under Article 173.
TABLE 2
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 224 AND ARTICLE 173
ARTICLE 224
ARTICLE 173
Presentation of the general approach
regarding the integration of ESG
criteria in the investment and voting
policy
Presentation of the general approach
regarding the integration of ESG criteria
in the investment & voting policy and risk
management
Content, frequency and means used to
inform investors about the ESG criteria
integrated in their investment policy
Content, frequency and means used to
inform subscribers, afiliates, contributors,
beneiciaries or clients about the criteria
selected to meet their ESG objectives in
their investment policy and, if applicable,
the risk management
List of UCITS which simultaneously
consider ESG criteria and its
percentage share in the total assets
under management
For asset managers: list of the managed
collective investment undertakings which
simultaneously consider ESG criteria and
its percentage share in total assets under
management
Possible accession of UCITS to
a charter, a code, an initiative
or obtaining a label due to its
consideration of ESG criteria and
compliance
Possible accession of the entity or of a
collective investment undertaking to a
charter, a code, an initiative or obtaining
a label due to its consideration of ESG
criteria and compliance. Brief description of
the charter, code, initiative or label
When entities have a risk management
framework in place: General description
of the internal procedures to identify the
risks associated with ESG issues, including
a general description of the risks identiied
and the exposure of its activities to these
risks
47
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
The secondary legislation establishes the general outline of the information to
be disclosed regarding the consideration of ESG criteria. Article 173 takes the
reporting outline introduced in Article 224 and enhances them by proposing
a set of illustrative information that could be reported by targeted entities
when the environmental criterion of climate change is considered. Moreover,
assets managed directly by the institutional investor or through a delegated
portfolio manager are both within the perimeter of the measurement.
When presenting the information, the institutional investor or the portfolio
manager may make distinctions by asset class, investment portfolio, issuer,
or any other relevant category, provided they indicate the reasons for this
differentiation. Table 3 describes the required information on the ESG criteria
integration in the investment policy.
TABLE 3
DISCLOSURE ON THE ESG INTEGRATION IMPLEMENTED BY
ENTITIES IN THEIR INVESTMENT STRATEGY AS DEFINED IN THE
SECONDARY LEGISLATION OF ARTICLE 173
REQUIREMENT
ESG criteria
considered
CRITERIA
Reasons for choosing these ESG criteria in particular
Indication that the criteria related to the environmental
objectives are part of:
•
Risks associated with climate change:
-
Physical risks
Transition risks
• An assessment of the contribution to meet the
international climate targets and the objectives of the
energy and ecological transition.
Information used
for the analysis of
the ESG criteria
48
This can include:
•
•
•
Ratings, inancial and extra-inancial data;
Internal and external analysis; and
Other relevant sources
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
TABLE 3
DISCLOSURE ON THE ESG INTEGRATION IMPLEMENTED BY
ENTITIES IN THEIR INVESTMENT STRATEGY AS DEFINED IN THE
SECONDARY LEGISLATION OF ARTICLE 173 (CONT.)
REQUIREMENT
Methodology
and results of
the analysis of
the ESG criteria
CRITERIA
The general description of the methodology may include:
• Overall characteristics;
• Details of the major underlying assumptions and
their compatibility with the international goal of limiting
global warming;
• Explanation of the relevance of the methodology
and selected parameters
The description of the methodologies implemented in
relation to the environmental criteria described in (a) can
include, when applicable:
• Consequences of extreme weather events and
climate change;
• Changes in the availability and price of natural
resources and operations performed in line with the
climate targets;
• Consistency between issuer’s capital expenditures
and the low-carbon strategy, in particular issuers
involved in the development of fossil fuels reserves.
• Any item related to the implementation by
governments of the international climate target and the
energy and ecological transition;
• Measure of past, current or future direct or indirect
GHG emissions, associated to the issuers in the
investment portfolio, including:
- The overall characteristics of the methodology,
the scope of GHG and how it contributes to the
risk analysis;
- If the methodology provides carbon intensities,
the chosen indicator must be disclosed; and,
- Weights used in case of aggregation of carbon
intensities;
• Amount of assets invested in thematic funds,
securities or infrastructure assets contributing to the
energy and ecological transition, collective investment
undertakings with a label, charter, or part of an initiative
that contributes to achieve the international climate
target and the energy and ecological transition;
• Any element that allows assessing the exposure to
risks associated to climate change and its contribution
to reach for the international climate target of limiting
global warming and the energy and ecological transition.
49
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
TABLE 3
DISCLOSURE ON THE ESG INTEGRATION IMPLEMENTED BY
ENTITIES IN THEIR INVESTMENT STRATEGY AS DEFINED IN THE
SECONDARY LEGISLATION OF ARTICLE 173 (CONT.)
REQUIREMENT
Integration of the
results of the ESG
analysis to the
investment policy
CRITERIA
• Description of the changes in the investment strategy
and risk management (when applicable) driven by the
ESG analysis. When applicable, a description of those
assets for which no ESG analysis was performed
• Presentation of the engagement strategy with
issuers, specifying notably the engagement policy and
the voting rights.
• Presentation of the engagement strategy with asset
managers including a description of the engagement
policy and the exercise of voting rights.
In addition, the information on the contribution to the
international target of limiting global warming and the energy
and ecological transition should be assessed based on:
• The process used to analyse the consistency of
the investment policy with these objectives and its
contribution.
• Indicative targets set by the entity itself specifying the
consistency with the international objective on climate
change and the guidelines adopted by the European
Union and the carbon budgets, and the French lowcarbon strategy;
• Actions to achieve the indicative targets including
changes in investment and divestment strategies,
engagement with issuers, increase in assets invested
in thematic funds, securities or assets of infrastructure
contributing to the energy and ecological transition,
collective investment schemes with a label, charter, or an
initiative; and
• The position in relation to the indicative targets set
for the last inancial year and reasons for any deviation.
In the event the inancial institution fails to provide or partially provide
the information required in Tables 2 and 3, an explanation has to be given
(“comply or explain” principle).
The resulting disclosure requirements capture the issues raised in
the parliamentary debates. However, the initial amendment included
50
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
requirements to measure the “green share” of the portfolio, i.e. assets that
induce reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. An inter-ministerial debate to
identify the appropriate methodology concluded that due to the complexity
of the existing approaches and the new disclosure requirements brought by
Article 173, the incorporation of such provisions at such an early stage could
represent a burden to institutional investors. This is now captured to a minor
extent in the disclosure of the proportion of assets held in thematic funds.
COMPLIANCE MECHANISMS
As in Article 224, the secondary legislation of Article 173 explicitly reminds
that the supervisory authority of each targeted entity is naturally in charge
of ensuring that supervisees comply with the regulation. The market already
had instruments in place signalling those inancial institutions engaged in
transparency and the energy transition, notably, the TEEC label. The civil
society, peer pressure and international initiatives on climate change are
also possible channels to encourage entities to take on this ESG reporting
in a more extensive manner. Prior to the publication of the decree several
institutional investors were already exploring changes to their reporting.
PUBLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Not all institutional investors have to report on the requirements of Tables 2
and 3 as the decree establishes a threshold. Some smaller entities are entitled
to present only the requirements of Table 2 (if they have for each fund a total
asset under management of below €500 million or if they belong to a group
drawing up consolidated accounts or combined balance sheets of less than
€500 million). The requirements of Table 2 have to be presented in an easily
identiiable way on the website of the entity and updated annually.
Institutional investors and asset managers that are above the threshold must
publish the information speciied in Table 3 on the website of the entity. In
the case of asset managers, the information has to be annually updated and
presented by UCITS and/or AIF, or the fund category. In addition, institutional
investors have to disclose the information in their annual report and asset
managers in the annual report of each fund.
POLICY MONITORING
The decree enters into force for the 2016 exercise. The information to be
included on the website of the entity has to be presented alongside the
publication of its annual report no later than 30 June 2017.
51
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Entities will have about a year to elaborate their irst batch of reporting in
accordance with the new provisions. However, the “comply and explain”
approach is deemed lexible enough to allow investors to make progress in
their reporting practices as they become familiar with climate metrics.
The secondary legislation has contributed to raising the awareness of the
French inancial sector on climate-change issues and more generally on
ESG integration. As an example, the AFG has established a working group
whose objective is to share experiences on climate reporting and examine
suitable methodologies that could be adopted by asset managers to enable
comparability across industry peer reporting52.
Institutional investors and asset managers are attentive to the developments
around the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. There is a
strong will to adopt reporting practices that are consistent with international
practices.
As indicated in the regulatory text, the Government will carry out an
assessment of the implementation of the secondary legislation in 2019. In
March 2016, the Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea, in partnership
with 2° Investing Initiative53, announced the launch of an Investor Climaterelated Disclosures Award54. Its objective is fourfold: identify and reward best
practices in climate reporting; support entities in their implementation of
climate-risk assessment methodologies; create a positive environment during
the implementation process of Article’s 173 secondary legislation; and, send a
signal to investors and the Parliament on the mobilization of the government
on climate change. The irst edition of the award ceremony took place on
October 28th, 2016 under the auspices of the OECD.
52 http://videos.assemblee-nationale.fr/video.3781905_56f2b51a1bb07.application-de-la-loi-sur-la-transition-pour-lacroissance-verte--table-ronde-sur-l-article-173-23-mars-2016
53 2° Investing Initiative is a multi-stakeholder think tank working to align the inancial sector investments with the
2°C climate goal.
54 http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/Segolene-Royal-mobilise-des.html
52
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
BOX A
ARTICLE 173
Other provisions of Article 173…
Article 173 has set an international example in terms of reporting. In addition to
its focus on institutional investors and asset managers, Article 173 also includes
reporting requirements for:
1. Corporates in general, which should disclose in their annual report:
a. for listed companies, the inancial risks related to climate change
and the measures they have taken to reduce those risks (e.g. adoption
of a low-carbon strategy);
b. for listed companies and some big unlisted ones, the consequences
of climate change on the company’s activities and their products or
services for listed companies and some big unlisted ones.
2. The French government is to remit a report to the Parliament on the
implementation of climate stress-testing methodology for the banking sector.
4.2 Legal Changes Promoting Disclosure and
ESG Integration
4.2.1 South Africa’s Pension Fund Amendment
Policy Evolution
South African Pension Fund regulatory amendments in 2011 have introduced
a requirement to include ESG considerations and are driving disclosure, if not
full sustainability reporting.
Regulation 28 was issued in terms of section 36(1)(bB) of South Africa’s
Pension Funds Act, which was originally promulgated in 1962. Section
36(1)(bB) provides a prudential standard that imposes asset-spreading
requirements for pension funds. The latest amendment of 2011 was driven
by innovation and developments in the inancial market as well as the global
inancial crisis, which exposed pension funds to greater risk and highlighted
the need to update the investment channels to allow prudent pension funds
to gain the necessary information prior to investing.
The development of Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act beneitted from
a broad multi-stakeholder consultation. Financial institutions (banks, asset
53
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
managers, investment companies etc.), the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
(JSE), industry associations, the Public Investment Corporation, civil society
and NGOs were called upon to discuss amendments in sustainability
reporting. The National Treasury released a irst draft of the regulation
for public comment in February 2010. The irst version of the amendment
included a provision suggesting 5% of the assets to be invested in SRI assets.
SRI advocates in the investment management community opposed the
proposal, arguing that SRI should not be seen as a separate asset class55.
After deliberations, a second draft was released in December 2010, for
another round of public comment and industry engagement. In this draft,
no threshold for SRI investments was suggested. This process culminated
in March 2011 with the publication of Regulation 28. During the negotiation
process, the main points contested were related to the technicalities on the
areas of investment, but the underlying principles of the amendment were not
disputed. Some of the issues put forward included the impacts on liquidity
management in a fund, and unintended impediments to investment in prodevelopment areas like unlisted equities.
Policy Design
Incorporating ESG Into Long-Term Investments
Regulation 28 has been inluenced by local developments within the inancial
sector and real economy, as well as broad government objectives of inancial
and economic inclusion. The retirement fund regulation aims to ensure that
retirement savings are invested in a prudent manner that protects the fund
members. Those savings should be channelled in ways that achieve economic
development and growth. The regulation intends to leverage the crucial
link between retirement savings and economic growth and development as
inluenced by the level of savings and its allocation towards productive assets.
The policy and objective of the regulation were clearly deined through
supporting policy and response documents. The Financial Services Board as
regulator of pension fund organizations prescribes the format for disclosure
of information setting out compliance. The format for disclosure and the
thresholds per asset category (cash, commodities, etc.) are speciied in Notice
3 of Regulation 28.
Regulation 28 advises retirement funds to consider ESG factors that
may impact investment risk. The provisions do not impose a direct ESG
55 Louche C. and Hebb T. 2014. Critical Studies in Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability Volume
7. Socially Responsible Investment in the 21st century: Does it makes a different for society?, p.223
54
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
investing requirement on retirement funds, i.e. they do not prescribe a
minimum percentage of assets to be invested using SRI strategies, but
rather recommends retirement funds to consider ESG factors when making
investments, speciically in assessing investment risk. Consequently,
Regulation 28 introduces a binding principle for pension funds to consider
ESG factors when making investments, and therefore must be reported on
to prove compliance. In case of non-compliance, the pension fund may be
subject to the full regulatory enforcement powers of the Financial Services
Board in fulilling its regulatory mandate.
Prior to the amendment of 2011, the pension funds regulation did not
include any reference to SRI and sustainability disclosure. The changes in
its requirements aim to better align the regulation of retirement funds with
other government policy objectives such as socially responsible investments
and economic transformation according to the national Black Economic
Empowerment requirements. The key reasons for the amendments to
Regulation 28 were:
• The need to update and align the deinitions, asset categories
and the structure of limits to those applied in the regulation of other
investment funds;
• The need to include speciications on derivatives, structured products
and foreign investments, which were not explicitly accommodated within
Regulation 28 and exposed the framework to abuses, as certain conducts
were not expressly prohibited or undermine potential risk–reward
beneits if underutilised.
Prior to Regulation 28, the existing regulation was only rules-based, and led
to funds louting the spirit of the law whilst still being compliant. The revised
regulation introduced an overlay of binding principles for pension funds,
dealing with matters such as member protection and taking account of ESG
investment risk.
Policy Monitoring
The policy and regulatory effectiveness of the regulation has not been tested
yet in South Africa, since policies are typically assessed ive years following
implementation. However, some early signs have been observed. Practitioners
believe the regulation is clear, but has been challenging for pension funds
to implement on account of the massive system changes implied, and the
new approach to supervision that relies on principles in addition to the preexisting rules. One of the challenges that the principle oficers of the pension
funds face is that of weighing up long term ESG issues against the iduciary
55
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
requirement to seek the best returns, which are measured in the short term.
Further research is necessary to assess the degree to which the regulation has
been put into effect and the impact that it is having on investment choices
made by pension funds.
Conclusion
Regulation 28 acknowledges the inner nature of investments of pension funds
and promotes the application of ESG investment analysis and reporting as
part of the iduciary duty of retirement funds.
BOX B
SOUTH AFRICAN PENSION FUND CHANGES
CRISA was launched in July 2011 and provides guidance on how institutional investors,
including pension funds, should execute investment analyses and activities and
exercise responsibility to promote sound governance such as that set out for all
organizations in South Africa’s King Code on Corporate Governance.
CRISA includes ive key principles:
1. Incorporate sustainability considerations, including ESG, into the investment
analysis and investment activities as part of the delivery of superior risk-adjusted
returns to the ultimate beneiciaries.
2. Demonstrate the acceptance of ownership responsibilities in the investment
arrangements and activities.
3. Where appropriate, consider a collaborative approach to promote
acceptance and implementation of the Principles of CRISA and other codes and
standards applicable to other institutional investors.
4. Recognise the circumstances and relationships that hold a potential for
conlicts of interest and proactively manage these when they occur.
5. Be transparent about the content of their policies, how the policies are
implemented and how CRISA is applied to enable stakeholders to make
informed assessments.
The effect of CRISA is to strengthen the implementation of the King Code, which
is non-mandatory and market-based, by institutional investors. For the purposes
of CRISA, all actors along the investment value chain are included – such as asset
managers, fund administrators as well as pension funds. The asset owners have
ultimate responsibility for the implementation of CRISA and should ensure that their
mandate to service providers includes the implementation of CRISA.
56
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
4.2.2 Switzerland: Increasing Public Pressure on Governance
Switzerland is a leading global cross border wealth management and
inancial centre. The inance industry generates around 13% of the Swiss
Confederation’s GDP and employs about 10% of its working population56.
Its transparency has recently been improved and Switzerland is part of the
Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Automatic Exchange of
Financial Account Information (MCAA). Concerns about lack of transparency
in the inancial sector and public concern about extremely high wages, were
the drivers behind a popular initiative calling not only for limitations on the
so-called “fat-cat” payouts to executives from listed companies but also for
pension funds to disclose their voting records at Annual General Meetings.
Policy Evolution
The Swiss industry had been increasingly active in the use of ESG screening
and the number of signatories to the voluntary PRI code is increasing. From
the governance perspective, public outrage at excessive salary payouts to key
players in the inancial services industry – including those implicated in the
2008 global inancial crisis – led to a public referendum in 2013 and a change
in the constitution as well as a transitional “ordonnance” (or statute).
Policy Design
The “Against-fat-cat-salaries” or Minder initiative of March 2013 was passed
when 68% of the population voted in favour of pension funds having to
actively exercise their voting rights at AGMs of Swiss companies on behalf
of their members, curbs on excessive payouts of “golden handshakes” and
“golden parachutes” to executives of Swiss companies and banks. This
was one of the highest popular referendum approval rates in Swiss history triggering debate across Europe.
It was followed by a Swiss Federal Council transitional ordonnance (RS221.331)
that became legally binding as of 2015 – Article 95 paragraph 3 of the Swiss
Federal Constitution. It is applicable to Swiss Corporations whose shares
are listed on a Swiss or foreign exchange. While no speciic sustainability
reporting is requested, compensation reports of Swiss companies are required
and pension funds must publish their voting record.
On 1 April 2015, the Swiss Federal Council adopted a position paper on
corporate social responsibility. One of the measures the plan foresees is the
56 http://www.swissbanking.org/home/inanzplatz-link/facts_igures.htm
57
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
submission of a proposal on sustainability reporting by companies.
A popular initiative proposing to introduce an article on the Responsibility
of Business into the Constitution is open for signature until 21 October 2016.
This article would require the Confederation to take measures to strengthen
respect for human rights and the environment by businesses.
Policy Monitoring
In addition to requiring AGM voting on Boards and remuneration, pension
funds are obliged to vote in the interest of their policyholders and must
disclose their voting behaviour. Sanctions include imprisonment of up to three
years.
Conclusion
The Swiss case study highlights the power of public pressure but also that
disclosure requirements do not necessarily translate into sustainability
reporting, unless speciically required by policy or adoption of voluntary
codes.
4.2.3 Brazilian Financial Institutions: Guidelines for Social
and Environmental Policies
In April 2014, the National Monetary Council of Brazil’s central bank adopted
Resolution 4327/201457. It established guidelines for the development and
implementation of corporate social and environmental policies, environmental
and social risk management, governance and disclosure (Política de
Responsabilidade Socioambiental – PRSA) for inancial institutions and other
entities authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do
Brasil – Bacen).
While the departure point is not a requirement to produce a sustainability
report, the requirement for the disclosure of key social and environmental
57 http://www.mma.gov.br/informma/item/10097-bancos-ter%C3%A3o-que-implantar-pol%C3%ADticasocioambiental-at%C3%A9-fevereiro-de-2015
See also:
• http://www3.ethos.org.br/cedoc/cmn-edita-normas-sobre-politica-de-responsabilidade-socioambiental-parainstituicoes-inanceiras/#.Vu_56OLhDIU
• http://www.mondaq.com/brazil/x/311440/Financial+Services/
The+Social+And+Environmental+Responsibility+Policy+Of+The+Brazilian+Financial+Institutions
• http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos/busca/downloadNormativo.asp?arquivo=/Lists/Normativos/
Attachments/48734/Res_4327_v1_O.pdf
58
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
information exists within the Resolution, which places direct responsibility on
the directors or oficers of the institution.
Each institution must adopt its own PRSA following consultation, which
considers the principles of relevance and proportionality:
•
Relevance: The degree of exposure to social and environmental risks.
• Proportionality: The PRSA should be compatible with the nature of
the organization as well as the complexity of its activities and inancial
products and services.
The PRSA must direct socio-environmental activities within the businesses
and in the relationships with the internal and external stakeholders, including
customers and users of the products and services. The institution should
encourage stakeholder participation in the PRSA process, which should
include guidelines on the strategic actions related to its governance and
social and environmental risk management. It must be evaluated every ive
years by the oficers (diretoria) and of the board of directors (conselho de
administração).
The PRSA covers inancial conglomerates; as well as the cooperative credit
system, including central cooperative credit and, when applicable, their
confederations and cooperative banks.
Each institution must have a governance structure compatible with its size,
the nature of its business, the complexity of the services and products, as well
as with its activities, adopted processes and systems. This PRSA governance
structure must provide for:
•
Implementation;
•
Monitoring and compliance;
•
Assessment of the effectiveness of implemented actions;
• Veriication of the adequacy of the social-environmental risk
management; and
•
Identiication of any shortcomings in the implementation of the actions
The institution should establish an Advisory Committee on Social and
Environmental Responsibility reporting to the board of directors or to the
oficers, with a mandate to monitor and evaluate the PRSA and propose
improvements. The composition of this committee should be disclosed.
59
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
The social and environmental risk management of the institution must consider:
• Systems, routines and procedures to identify, evaluate, mitigate,
monitor and manage the social and environmental risk in the activities
and transactions of the institution;
• Creating a data registry covering effective losses due to social and
environmental damage, for a minimum period of ive years, including
values, type, location and economic sector object of the transaction;
• Prior assessment of the potential social and environmental impacts
from new forms of products and services, including in relation to the
reputation´s risk; and
• Procedures for adequacy of social and environmental risk
management to the legal, regulatory and market changes.
When conducting transactions related to economic activities with the greatest
potential to cause social and environmental damage, the institution must
establish speciic criteria and mechanisms of risk assessment.
The PRSA and the action plan must be approved by the oficers and by the
board of directors, in order to ensure integration with the other policies such
as the credit, human resources management and risk management policies of
the institution.
The institution must designate a director responsible for fulilment of the
PRSA; formalize the PRSA and ensure its internal and external disclosure;
and maintain documentation relating to the PRSA required by the regulator,
Bacen.
Pursuant to CMN Res. 4327/2014, Bacen may order the adoption of controls
and procedures concerning the PRSA, establishing a deadline for its
implementation.
The strategy of the Brazilian regulator was to create rules that are adaptable
to the characteristics of each institution. The new regulation requires each
inancial institution to perform an in-depth brainstorming exercise about its
activities and its business proile and from that exercise, implement its own
PRSA and associated controls.
60
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
4.3 Voluntary Codes Promoting Sustainability
Reporting
4.3.1 The South African Case
In South Africa, companies are required to report a number of key criteria on
governance, labour issues, economic transition and other key factors under
varied pieces of legislation such as the Companies Act, the Labour Relations
Act and the Codes to promote the inancial and economic inclusion of the
population previously excluded from the formal economy by the Apartheid
system. The requirement to redress past exclusions is part of a mandatory
reporting requirement for all companies, including those in the inancial
sector, which also report to the inancial authorities on the Financial Sector
Code, now part of the regulatory framework. The Financial Sector Code,
similar to codes adopted by other sectors, was developed in consultation
with the industry and addresses the issues speciic to the requirements for
the transformation of the inancial sector. The aim is to transform the sector
so that it is more relective of and accessible to previously excluded or
disadvantaged communities.
The focus on environmental issues for the inancial sector is largely driven by
the voluntary adoption of codes and principles, such as the Equator Principles
for project inance and related lending, the Environmental Code of the
Banking Association, the PRI, the Code for Responsible Investment for South
Africa (CRISA, see chapter 4.2.1, Box b) for asset managers, the Principles
for Sustainable Insurance and the JSE’s SRI index. Not all participants in the
sector are members of these initiatives and the reporting requirements vary in
comprehensiveness and quality. The Government Employees Pension Fund
was one of the irst signatories of the PRI.
In addition, the King Code on Corporate Governance, adopted in various
iterations since 2002 and applicable to all companies including state-owned
entities, makes provision for reporting on material issues beyond the legal
requirements to publish annual statements of accounts.
While the King Code is technically voluntary, the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange requires all companies to report their compliance with the Code or
provide explanations for non compliance.
The King Code reporting requirements have been incorporated into the
Johannesburg Stock Exchange’s listing requirements. In previous iterations,
61
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
the Code required the publication of sustainability reports – either standalone reports or combined with the annual report to shareholders. In King
III, this became a requirement to produce integrated reports. State-owned
enterprises (SOEs), which also produce integrated reports, are subject to
national reporting requirements speciied by the Treasury, which exercises
oversight on public expenditure and sets the requirements for management,
auditing and disclosure of public funds.
One recent legislative development, which includes a requirement to report,
is the adoption of Regulation 28 in the Pension Funds Act (see chapter 4.2.1).
4.3.2 Swiss Voluntary Adoption of the PRI
The government of Switzerland was an early funder of the Principles
for Responsible Investment and both private and public Swiss inancial
institutions58 participated in the process of its development. There are
currently 65 UNPRI signatories from Switzerland (eight asset owners, 44
investment managers and 13 professional service partners).
The number of UN PRI transparency reports iled by Swiss companies has
increased from at least 28 in 2013 and 2014 to 36 from 2014 to 2015. The 15
signatories that have not iled a report are only required to do so in the next
year after their one-year-grace-period. The professional service partners do not
ile transparency reports. PRI reporting requirements are currently under review.
Eurosif reports that: “In terms of ESG integration, it seems that the Swiss asset
management industry is increasingly adopting ESG integration strategies and
these have thereby reached considerable importance within the Swiss market,
which is characterised by a high proportion of retail investors. Seventy percent
of the Swiss investors (mainly pension funds) that have signed the UNPRI
make use of ESG aspects when giving external mandates.”
During 2015 and 2016, activists have focused on Swiss corporate disclosure in
relation to a number of other inancial issues including:
•
Beneicial ownership of equities – a law with tough sanctions was enacted;
•
Tax disclosure with regard to commodity trading revenue and lows; and,
• Human rights and gender, relating to the impact in developing
countries of laws that protect corporate secrecy.
Swiss inancial corporations are not yet obliged to produce a sustainability report.
58 www.pri.org
62
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
BOX C
PUBLIC SRI LABELS IN FRANCE
“Socially Responsible Investment” (SRI) Label
Article 224 was one of the initial elements that fed the development of the irst
SRI label supported by the government. Created in January 2016 by the Ministry
of Environment, Energy and the Sea and the Ministry of Economy and Finance, it
aims to promote the visibility of SRI investments at a European level. The SRI label
is awarded on the basis of six pillars:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Integration of the ESG criteria in the fund’s objectives;
Methodology of analysis and ratings of issuers;
Integration of ESG criteria in the portfolio construction and management;
ESG engagement policies with issuers;
Communication and transparency;
Positive impact on the sustainable development of the economy
The measure of the performance on ESG issues is backed by the obligation to
report on at least one prescribed indicator of one of the following four areas:
BOX C
Environment, Social, Governance and Human Rights.
“Energy and Ecological Transition for Climate” (TEEC) Label
The “Energy and Ecological Transition for the Climate” Label (‘TEEC’ in
French) was launched in December 2015, during the COP21, by the Ministry of
Environment, Energy and the Sea. The label was built to meet two main objectives:
1. Mobilize more savings for the beneit of the energy transition and the
ight against climate change;
2. Encourage the creation of new green investment funds (listed equity,
private equity, green bonds, etc.)
In order to achieve these goals, the label is awarded on the basis of four criteria
relating to portfolio construction and management:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Exclusions of companies/sectors (fossil fuel, nuclear energy);
Green share of the investments;
ESG controversies; and
Impact, by reporting on the environmental ‘footprint’.
In addition, the impact requirement is strongly guided by sustainability reporting,
as the fund has to report on the mechanisms for measuring the contribution of
its investments to the energy and ecological transition and to report at least one
prescribed indicator of one of four reporting areas (climate change, water, natural
resources and biodiversity). The Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea,
project leader on the label management, aims at developing the TEEC label on a
European scale.
63
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
4.4 Market Instruments
4.4.1 Sustainable Responsible Investment Indices: The
Brazilian and South African Cases
Legislation is by far not the only tool available to governments who wish to
foster transparency in the inancial sector. Many governments have joined
efforts with stock exchanges to develop sustainability indices that recognize
corporate leadership in sustainability matters. These indices include
companies from a variety of sectors and were not speciically developed to
enhance transparency of inancial institutions. SRI indices provide investors
with clear signals that enable them to steer their investments towards the
most sustainable companies. SRI indices are therefore mechanisms that allow
investors to secure the long-term viability of their investments by taking into
account the sustainability performance of listed companies, which thereby
rewards the most sustainable companies with enhanced visibility both towards
the investor community and the general public.
4.4.1.1 BRAZIL
Accelerating Drivers for Increased Transparency
The creation of the Index for Corporate Sustainability (ISE) of Brazil’s
BM&FBOVESPA stock exchange in 2005 builds on the growing development
of socially responsible or sustainable and responsible investment around
the world since the 1970s. It was also inspired by the launch of similar stock
exchange initiatives such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) in 1999,
the FTSE4Good of the London Stock Exchange in 2001 and the Johannesburg
Stock Exchange’s SRI Index in 2004. The ISE constitutes an instrument that
adds to traditional inancial analysis values such as sustainable development,
performance comparability, socio-environmental responsibility and long-term
vision and security for shareholders.
During the 1980s, Brazil saw a growth of organizations focusing on social
responsibility, environmental protection and business ethics. The Brazilian
Institute of Social and Economic Analyses (Ibase), established in 1981, was
the irst organization to monitor the performance of corporations and their
role in the country’s social development. Ibase launched its Model for Social
Audit in 1997, which was well received by businesses and for years remained
the only reference model to report on non-inancial corporate activities in the
country. In the 1990s, the Ethos Institute, formed by a group of executives
64
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
and entrepreneurs determined to disseminate good practices in the Brazilian
corporate landscape, started working on governance and corporate social
responsibility issues. Ethos, in fact, consolidated a movement stemming
from Business Leaders National Understanding (PNBE, for Pensamento
Nacional das Bases Empresariais), an organization focusing on entrepreneurial
modernism and defending the re-democratization of Brazil after the end of
the military regime in 1985.
The irst research on SRI in Brazil was conducted by Unibanco in 2000. Banco
Real created the Ethical Fund, the irst SRI fund in emerging markets, a year
later. This investment fund targeted bank clients interested in investing
in companies committed to ethical principles. Other banks followed by
launching different types of responsible funds, for example, dedicating part
of the management fee (usually 50%) to social programmes, such as CEF’s
“Fome Zero” (“Zero Hunger”, a government programme aiming at reducing
hunger and poverty) and HSBC’s “Ação Social” (“Social Action”, social
projects run by NGOs).
The actions towards the promotion of ESG topics within the Brazilian stock
exchange started in 2000. The São Paulo Stock Exchange (BOVESPA which
merged with the Brazilian Mercantile and Futures Exchange BM&F in 2008)
introduced three listing segments in which companies can voluntarily adhere
to different standards of corporate governance: The Novo Mercado (New
Market) and the two Differentiated Levels of Corporate Governance (IGCX
and IGCT). Although membership is voluntary, once a company is listed in
a given segment, it has to adopt the mandatory standards imposed by the
exchange.
Novo Mercado has played a particularly important role in encouraging
companies to commit to advanced criteria for corporate governance
and thus became an instrument of self-regulation, capable of impacting
the adoption of best governance practices. The annual production of a
sustainability report or an integrated report is not a requirement. However,
since 2012 BM&FBovespa has recommended that companies produce either
a sustainability or an integrated report and provide BM&FBovespa with
information about where the report is available. Those who do not report
must explain why they do not.
This “comply or explain” principle encourages companies to progressively
adhere to the practice of providing quick access to ESG information to
investors and other interested parties. By doing so, the exchange helps to
reinforce this growing international trend in the capital markets.
65
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
After the launch of the New Market and Differentiated Levels of Corporate
Governance, the BM&FBOVESPA stock exchange sought an alliance with
Fundação Getulio Vargas’ Center of Studies on Sustainability (GVces) in
São Paulo. This partnership gave birth to the Corporate Sustainability Index
(ISE) in 2005, a major global reference among indicators for corporate
management and governance, and the only SRI index in Latin America.
In addition to these initiatives, BM&FBOVESPA has since 2012 recommended
that listed companies indicate in the Reference Form (Formulário de
Referência, a mandatory public information report published by its listed
companies) whether they publish sustainability reports or similar documents,
and how these can be accessed. Companies not publishing such documents
should explain the reasons. This “comply or explain” measure (similar to that
included in the JSE requirements, see next chapter 4.4.2.1), allows companies
to gradually increase their rate of reporting to investors on ESG criteria and
aims to provide easy access to this information.
Policy Evolution
Developing the ISE – A Broad, Multi-Stakeholder Process
The ISE was the result of a joint effort by several organizations. It was initiated
by the Bovespa Operations Superintendent (Ricardo Nogueira), the creators
of the Ethical Fund (ABN Amro Real SRI fund), the Brazilian Institute of
Corporate Governance (IBGC), the Centre for Sustainability Studies of the
Getulio Vargas Foundation (GVces) and the Ethos Institute, among others. The
representatives of the Brazilian Association of Closed Pension Funds (Abrapp),
the Association of Capital Markets Analysts and Investment Professionals
(Apimec), the National Association of Investment Banks (Anbid), the Brazilian
Institute of Social and Economic Analyses (Ibase), the Brazilian Institute of
Corporate Governance (IBGc), the Ethos Institute, BM&FBOVESPA, GVces
and the Ministry of the Environment organized meetings during the period
September to December 2003 to discuss the sustainability index criteria.
Main Challenges
In their book ISE – Sustainability in the Capital Market, A. W. Marcondes
and C. D. Bacarji (2010)59 identiied two main issues that were the focus of
discussions during the development process of the ISE: sector exclusions and
the triple bottom line.
59 “ISE – Sustainability in the Capital Market”, A. W. Marcondes and C. D. Bacarji, 2010: http://www.bmfbovespa.
com.br/Indices/download/Livro-ISE.pdf
66
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
The issue of excluding companies in controversial sectors (such as tobacco,
alcoholic beverages, weapons or pornography) with negative screening
practices emerged from the beginning of negotiations. The position of the
representatives of Brazilian investment funds and institutional investors, taking
into account experience with ethical funds, was that such enterprises should
naturally be excluded from the portfolio, a stance supported by Ibase and the
Ministry of the Environment.
However, the Ethos Institute argued that the index would lack legitimacy
to question the rights of companies legally allowed to operate, which paid
taxes and in many cases had implemented socially responsible practices.
GVces also believed that it was important to encourage these companies
to invest in compensatory actions to reduce the negative impacts caused
by their operations. Furthermore, it was argued that the products of these
companies were not the only ones causing negative impacts on society
or the environment. For instance, the oil and energy industries, which are
responsible for a substantial portion of greenhouse gas emissions and social
and environmental impacts, remain vital for the economy.
In April 2005, ISE’s Board voted on the issue and it was decided that
companies would not be barred from applying. The board also determined
that the index’s methodology should adopt rigorous mechanisms to ilter
companies with products that have negative impacts.
The second major topic of discussions was the determination of the
assessment criteria that the ISE would apply to companies. Initially, the
emphasis was placed on social responsibility, on an equal footing as economic
and inancial performance. It soon became evident that a comprehensive
index would also need to take into account environmental and corporate
governance criteria. The concept of Triple Bottom Line, from John Elkington,
including the social, environmental and economic dimensions, was thus used
as a basis for developing the assessment methodology, together with the
recent implementation of the Novo Mercado.
These negotiations deined the ISE’s foundations, a performance-based
assessment carried out on the basis of a questionnaire structured around four
Dimensions: Economic and Financial, Corporate Governance, and Social and
Environmental Responsibility. Since then the questionnaire has developed to
include three additional dimensions: General, Nature of Product, and Climate
Change.
67
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Policy Design
ISE Objectives
The Index for Corporate Sustainability (ISE) is a tool for comparative analysis
of the performance of companies listed on BM&FBOVESPA. It considers
corporate sustainability, based on economic eficiency, environmental
equilibrium, social justice and corporate governance. Its aim is to enhance
public understanding of companies and groups committed to sustainability,
differentiating them in terms of quality, level of commitment to sustainable
development, equity, transparency and accountability, their products, as well
as business performance in the economic, inancial, social, environmental and
climate change dimensions.
BM&FBOVESPA is responsible for the calculation and technical management
of the index. As its technical partner, GVces is in charge of the development
and improvement of the ISE corporate assessment methodology (relected in
the ISE questionnaire for companies) and of the coordination of the selection
processes for the annual index review.
ISE is an index composed of about 40 companies selected among the issuers
of the 200 most liquid shares. Participation is voluntary and the index’s
portfolio is reviewed on an annual basis. The methodology is based on a
questionnaire built through a multi-stakeholder participatory process.
ISE’s main objectives are:
• To create an investment culture compatible with the current social
demands for sustainable development and to stimulate corporate
responsibility;
• To build an objective tool to compare the performance of listed
companies from a sustainability perspective;
• To highlight companies committed to sustainable development and
provide investors with a clear differentiation, rather than an exclusive
focus on short-term inancial returns; and
• To encourage the launch of new SRI funds and to become a
benchmark for comparing their performances.
68
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ISE Governance Structure
The ISE is currently governed by an independent board, which is responsible
for approving any changes to the rules and methodology of the index, and
the admission or exclusion of companies included in the index portfolio
(which is annually renewed).
TABLE 4
ISE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES
STAKEHOLDER
Financial sector
INSTITUTION
• BM&FBOVESPA (Chair of the Deliberative
Council)
• ABRAPP – Brazilian Association of Pension Funds
(Associação Brasileira de Entidades Fechadas de
Previdência Complementar)
• ANBIMA – Brazilian Association of Financial and
Capital Markets Entities (Associação Brasileira de
Entidades dos Mercados Financeiros e de Capitais)
• APIMEC – Association of Capital Market
Investment Analysts and Professionals (Associação
dos Analistas e Profissionais de Investimento do
Mercado de Capitais)
• IBRACON – Institute of Independent Auditors
of Brazil (Instituo dos Auditores Independentes do
Brasil)
Government
Non-proit organizations
• MMA – Ministry of Environment (Ministério do
Meio Ambiente)
• ETHOS Institute
• IBGC – Brazilian Institute of Corporate
Governance (Instituto Brasileiro de Governança
Corporativa)
• GIFE – Group of Institutes, Foundations and
Enterprises (Grupo de Institutos, Fundações e
Empresas)
International Organizations
• UN Environment
• IFC – International Finance Corporation
69
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
In addition to these institutions, ISE reviews its methodology on an annual
basis through a participatory process open to companies, civil society
organizations, academia, investors and other stakeholders.
Who Can Become an ISE Member?
Eligible stocks for possible selection as ISE constituents must meet the
following cumulative criteria60:
1. Being amongst the eligible stocks which, sorted in descending order
by individual tradability ratio (IN) over the three previous portfolio cycles,
rank in the top 200 positions;
2. Having actively traded in 50% of the trading sessions held over the
three previous portfolio cycles;
3. Not constituting “penny stock”; and
4. Where a company has multiple listings, if one type of stock meets all
the membership requirements, the other types of stock of that company
will be accepted for membership as well, provided they rank in the group
of eligible stocks which, as measured in descending order by individual
tradability ratio (IN) over a period comprising the three previous portfolio
cycles, collectively account for 99% of the total sum of such metric.
Each year, the companies qualiied by the criteria above are invited to
participate in the ISE portfolio selection process. Those willing to take part
in the process must then ill in the ISE questionnaire, providing a broad
amount of ESG information, which will be the basis for selection of portfolio
constituents by the ISE Governance Committee (CISE).
ISE Assessment Methodology
The ISE methodology developed by the FGV Center for Sustainability Studies
(GVces) is based on:
•
Company performance;
•
The ISE questionnaire; and
• An assessment of documents submitted by the company to
substantiate the information provided.
The ISE questionnaire is structured into dimensions, criteria and indicators.
The questions are currently grouped in seven dimensions, about 30 criteria
and 70 indicators, totalling approximately 180 questions to be answered by
60 For more detailed information, please refer to the Concepts and Practices Manual for BM&FBOVESPA Indices.
70
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
companies. The methodology assigns the same weight to each of the seven
dimensions, which evaluate different sustainability aspects61:
TABLE 5
ISE QUESTIONNAIRE CRITERIA
ISE QUESTIONNAIRE DIMENSIONS
General
• Commitments to sustainable
development
• Alignment with good sustainability
practices
• Transparency of corporate information
• Anti-corruption policies and practices
Nature of Product
• Personal and overall impacts of
products and services provided by the
company
• Adoption of the precautionary principle
• Availability of information for
consumers
Corporate Governance
• Relationship between partners
• Board of Directors’ structure and
management
• Audits and oversight
• Practices relating to conduct and
conlict of interests
Economic and Financial
• Corporate policies, management,
performance, and statutory compliance
Social
• Corporate policies, management,
performance, and statutory compliance
Environmental
• Corporate policies, management,
performance, and statutory compliance.
• This dimension includes sector-specific
questionnaires.
Climate Change
• Corporate policy, management,
performance and level of information
disclosure on the topic.
61 Alignment with good sustainability practices includes, inter alia: compensation pegged to the company’s social
and environmental performance and the adoption of a plan that provides a correlation between assumed risks,
compensation actually paid, company’s results.
71
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
The comprehensive assessment process requires companies to show
satisfactory performance in every dimension of the questionnaire and to
submit documents that conirm the information provided. The assessment
method combines:
• Quantitative analysis: Score achieved by the company based on its
questionnaire answers; and
• Qualitative analysis: Evaluation of the quality of the documentation
submitted to conirm the questionnaire answers.
Requirements for the Compilation and Publication of Reporting
The information provided by companies through ISE does not constitute
a report: the framework is the questionnaire itself, and for this reason,
companies do not have to prepare a speciic report. However, the ISE has
three main approaches to contribute to public information.
In 2011, the ISE started a transparency promotion effort by including in its
questionnaire a request for authorization to disclose the company’s answers
on the ISE website62. A positive response to this question is worth 15 points –
higher than all other questions to further incentivise transparency. Thirty-four
companies authorized disclosure of such information in the ISE’s 2013/2014
portfolio.
Secondly, after participating in the selection process, companies receive a
feedback report prepared by GVces. The report contains the score obtained
by the company, compared to the average, maximum and minimum scores of
all participants, as well as a qualitative opinion on the documents presented
by the company to support its questionnaire answers. This report belongs to
the company, which may choose to further disclose its content.
Finally, BM&FBOVESPA and GVces prepare and publish consolidated data
and analyses based on the answers provided by participating companies.
Level of Complexity
A challenge for companies applying for ISE listing has been to clearly understand
the selection criteria used in the index’s methodology. The complexity of
sustainability issues can lead to ambiguity and subjectivity in the interpretation of
the ISE questionnaire and other sustainability tools.
The current methodology uses the same questionnaire to assess companies
62 www.isebvmf.com.br
72
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
of different economic sectors. Both the clarity of the questions and the
sectoral customization are points to which the index methodology still needs
to dedicate special attention.
Incentives and Penalties
As described above, companies eligible to the ISE portfolio undergo a
qualitative assessment consisting in an evaluation of randomly selected
documents submitted by the company to conirm the questionnaire answers
(one for each section of the questionnaire). The veriication is performed by
GVces staff, and veriied by a qualiied auditing company (KPMG as of 2015).
Removal of companies from the index is the ISE’s mechanism to ensure
compliance with the information submitted both at the moment of submission
and throughout the yearly portfolio cycle of the index.
A company shall be removed from the index’s theoretical portfolio in the
event that:
1. Any of the inclusion criteria (see “ISE objectives” above) is no longer met;
2. In the course of the portfolio cycle, it is designated to be under
‘exceptional trading status’. In this event, the removal will be
implemented from the close of the irst trading day following recognition
of such status; and
3. An occurrence in the course of the portfolio cycle has (in the
discretion of the ISE Governance Committee) materially and adversely
affected the corporate sustainability performance of the issuer. In this
event, the removal will be implemented in accordance with the removal
decision of the ISE Governance Committee (CISE).
Policy Monitoring
A Key Driver for Sustainable Corporate Practices
In 2010, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) evaluated63 the hypothesis
that sustainability corporates show superior performance and that the
inclusion of a company in a sustainability index would stimulate demand for its
shares and increase their price. In order to be included in the ISE, companies
have to demonstrate the quality of their sustainability practices, a process that
could improve the company’s competitiveness and may lead to an enhanced
reputation.
63 BM&FBOVESPA Sustainability Index & the Responsible Practices of Brazilian Corporations, IFC, 2010:
http://bit.ly/1ipJLu7
73
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
The IFC concluded that the ISE had a considerable impact on corporate
practice among ISE listed companies and those not part of the index. In
this sense, the ISE serves as a key driver for the introduction of sustainable
corporate practices.
The ISE questionnaire relects the need for compliance with legal
requirements and encourages voluntary corporate sustainability practices.
Challenges in Promoting Sustainable Investment
The introduction of the ISE was followed by the creation of new SRI funds, but
most of them have remained relatively small, with the market controlled by
the two funds that existed before the creation of the index. In October 2010,
there were 10 SRI funds in Brazil managing US$580 million. The two largest
among them, which existed prior to the ISE, managed 70% of the assets. Most
of the observed market growth has resulted from value appreciation.
Considering the index’s strategic objectives, it can be concluded that the
creation of ISE stimulated an investment culture compatible with the SRI
tendencies, and encouraged the launch of new SRI funds in the country.
Companies that belong to sustainability indices are more capable of
attracting socially responsible investors in Brazil or abroad, as the index is
seen as an eficient and reliable market signal that a company has integrated
sustainable practices.
However, the ISE has had limited success in serving as a benchmark for larger
investors, who continue favouring traditional inancial indices. The main
obstacle to higher investor engagement is the limited evidence to support
the argument that corporate sustainability is important for investors because
it aims to increase long-term shareholder value by integrating long-term
economic, environmental and social aspects into the business strategy.
In addition, the relatively small number (40) of ISE listed companies only
provides room for partial investment diversiication. Each year, the issuers
of the 200 most liquid shares on the BM&FBOVESPA, i.e. approximately 180
companies, are invited to participate in the ISE selection process. However,
the number of companies who actually participate remains between 45 and
55 each year. There is a clear need to attract more companies to participate in
the selection process.
Conclusion
Financial sector companies compete at many levels, including on reputation,
74
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
which is an essential element in building trust with potential customers.
Linking the power of the market to build and protect long-term value creation
for the company and Brazilian society has been a useful strategy for the
Brazilian stock exchanges.
4.4.1.2 SOUTH AFRICA: JOHANNESBURG STOCK EXCHANGE
SRI INDEX
Policy Evolution
When the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) adopted the King II Code of
Corporate Governance as part of its listing requirements in 2003, it became
one of the irst international exchanges to require sustainability reporting.
King II, which became a JSE listing requirement in 2003, on a “comply or
explain” basis, explicitly required companies to implement the practice of
sustainability reporting as a core aspect of corporate governance. While
neither the Code, nor the JSE, speciically required the use of the GRI
sustainability reporting framework, it became the de-facto benchmark of
good sustainability reporting.64
While the JSE listing requirements and the SRI Index function separately,
a company in material breach of JSE regulation, particularly as it relates to
reporting on the implementation of the King Code, would struggle to meet
the requirements for the SRI Index. Neither the JSE nor the King Code requires
audit or assurance of sustainability or integrated reporting, although King III
strongly recommends it. However, the JSE Listing Requirements as well as the
Companies Act require audit of the inancial statements issued by a company.
The third version of the Code, King III, became operational in 2010 and
included more speciic recommendations on reporting in an integrated
fashion; this version of the King Code was also incorporated by the JSE listing
requirements on a “comply or explain” basis. Although King III anticipated
that sustainability reporting would continue as a necessary foundation to
good integrated thinking and reporting, it focused on the integration of
material issues, speciically including ESG issues, alongside the inancials to
enable better decision making by stakeholders. King III supports the notion
of sustainability reporting, but makes the case that although it used to be
done in addition to inancial reporting, it now should now be integrated with
inancial reporting.
64 https://www.jse.co.za/content/JSERulesPoliciesandRegulationItems/Background%20and%20Criteria%202014.pdf
75
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
The JSE launched the Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Index in South
Africa in May 2004 to identify those companies listed on the JSE that integrate
the principles of the triple bottom line and good governance into their
business activities. They were evaluated (but not ranked) on an annual basis
against set criteria that were available on the JSE’s website. While the eligible
universe of companies was the All Share Index (or all listed companies),
the SRI Index was initially based on voluntary participation, and attracted
participation mostly by large listed companies. Automatic assessment of the
TOP 40 companies was introduced in 2007 and was expanded to the TOP
100 with voluntary participation available to all other companies in 2008.
Automatic assessment of the smaller companies, and, thus the full All Share
Index, started in 2013. The All Share Index comprises companies representing
99% of the JSE’s market capitalization, usually around 160 companies.
The SRI Index provides a broad assessment of company policies and
practices against globally aligned and locally relevant corporate responsibility
standards. Over the years, the index has incrementally increased the
reporting requirements in terms of both depth of coverage and number of
issues covered, adding material elements relevant to the country – such as
indicators on HIV and AIDS issues as well as black economic empowerment
and skills development – and more recently increasing the focus on reporting
on greenhouse gas emissions. While the SRI Index evaluation process does
not claim to be a measure of legal compliance, it has in the past excluded
companies on the basis of known infringements or material breaches,
for example of competition law. The SRI Index has always been seen as a
facilitation vehicle to enable investors to consider non-inancial risk variables
in investment decisions, as such risks do carry the potential to have signiicant
inancial impacts. Overall, the SRI Index contributed to the development of
responsible business practice in South Africa and beyond65. In 2015, the SRI
Index transitioned to the FTSE/JSE Responsible Investment Index Series.
Policy Design
By 2014, all companies listed in the FTSE/JSE All Share Index were eligible
to be part of the SRI Index66. The indicators covered areas of policies and
management and how these should be relected in the reporting of each
ESG pillar (see Table 6). Moreover, a distinction between core and desirable
indicators allowed for distinction between issues considered as minimum
requirements from those that may be more aspirational. Overall, the index
65 https://www.jse.co.za/content/JSERulesPoliciesandRegulationItems/Background%20and%20Criteria%202014.pdf
66 The FTSE/JSE All Share Index has 164 constituents, whereas the SRI Index has 82 (2014).
76
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
criteria served as a guidance framework for companies to identify issues that
could affect their business and stakeholders.
Since inception, the index incorporated a sector classiication requiring sectors
with a higher impact on the environment to report in more detail on their
management of environmental impacts than those sectors with a lower impact
classiication. A requirement to report on climate change indicators was added
in 2010. Information on senior responsibility, climate change commitments and
emissions needed to be reported in order to meet this assessment.
TABLE 6
JSE SRI INDEX AREAS OF MEASUREMENT
ENVIRONMENT
• Addressing all key issues
• Working towards
environmental sustainability
CLIMATE CHANGE
• Managing and reporting on efforts to
reduce carbon emissions and deal with
the effects of climate change
SOCIETY
GOVERNANCE AND RELATED
CONCERNS
• Training and Development
• Employee Relations
• Health and Safety
• Equal Opportunities
• Community Relations
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Black Economic
Empowerment
• Diversity in Workforce
• HIV / AIDS
•
•
•
•
•
Board Practice
Ethics
Indirect Impacts
Business Value and Risk Management
Broader Economic Issues
The SRI Index was speciic in the requirements for inclusion, although
lexibility was allowed in some cases – e.g. the index criteria are not speciic
in terms of the format of publication (e.g. included in an annual report or
website), as long as information is available in the public domain.
The SRI Index is recognised by companies as having spurred action on
reporting and engagement in sustainability issues. The index statistics on
companies meeting the requirements as well as expanded conversations
between the JSE and issuers evidences this success.67 These conversations
are in the form of brieings to companies, master classes and investor days
at which SRI leading companies were invited to present and respond to
questions. When appropriate, conversations were held with sectors – such as
67 https://www.jse.co.za/content/JSEPresentationItems/2014SRIAnnualResultsPressRelease.pdf
77
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
with the mining industry following the Marikana disaster – as well as one-onone conversations with companies to explain their failure to meet inclusion
requirements. A JSE-convened independent advisory committee for the SRI
Index and a special sub-committee previously dealt with policy changes and
contested issues (these have fallen away in the past year due to the switch to
the FTSE/JSE Responsible Investment index, although FTSE maintains a UKbased advisory committee).
While failure to be included in the index or a low score had reputational
and investor consequences for companies, it did not have an impact on its
standing as a listed company.
Policy Monitoring
The JSE’s reporting requirements around governance and application of
the King Code principles, in combination with the SRI Index process, have
been signiicantly inluential in enhancing the quality and completeness of
corporate disclosure around sustainability issues. The increase of companies
included in the SRI Index is evidence of this, as well as various companies
using the SRI Index as a benchmark driving reporting content.
The SRI Index has also expanded the relationships of the JSE to stakeholders
such as NGOs in the ESG or corporate responsibility environment, consulting
irms and monitoring groups. Moreover, at least two reporting awards were
based on the SRI Index, namely the EY Excellence in Sustainability Reporting.
The Nkonki Integrated Reporting award still uses the SRI Index constituency
as a base for research.
The JSE announced on 3 June 2015 that it is partnering with FTSE Russell
to further advance the promotion of ESG disclosure by listed companies.
This new offering will replace the pioneering SRI Index, which has been the
JSE’s lagship sustainability product since 2004. The new offering will build
on the achievements of the SRI Index and the strides of corporates, while
enabling expanded opportunities for investors to integrate ESG issues into
investments. Moreover, the JSE’s collaboration with FTSE Russell from 2015
will signiicantly expand the scope for creation of inancial products based
on ESG criteria. The new index series was launched in October 2015 with the
2016 results expected in the second half of the year.
Conclusion
The JSE has demonstrated that with incremental change over a period of
78
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
time, it is possible to build a reporting culture within corporations, including
the inancial sector. The linking of the JSE’s SRI Index and the King Code on
Corporate Governance was a key factor in the rapid uptake of this practice.
Research will be required over time to determine if sustainability reporting
practices continue.
4.4.2 Labels and Awards: The Austrian Case
Before the rise of CSR in the late 1990s, a general understanding of corporate
responsibility was incorporated in Austria through the dissemination of
environmental reporting schemes and, particularly, the Sozialpartnerschaft,
the Austrian Cooperative partnership between government, business, labour
and other partners. Despite the relative early steps in transparency, more
profound CSR approaches and transparent sustainability reporting developed
slowly. This is also true for the Austrian inancial industry, which has had a
narrowly deined understanding of sustainability, focusing mainly on employee
relations, corporate citizenship and ofice ecology. The social and ecological
impact of inancial products and the associated monetary stocks and lows has
largely not been reported.
The improvement of the societal discourse on CSR development in the
political system and the Austrian Strategy for Sustainable Development
(NSTRAT) have more systematically formalized and institutionalized the topic
since 2002. The NSTRAT was the starting point of a comprehensive multistakeholder approach to address, establish and institutionalize sustainability
at the political level. The publication emphasizes transparency as an important
factor for various ields. NSTRAT’s documentation contains various precise
objectives for improvement of sustainability reporting both in general and in
the inancial markets. Speciically, in the inancial sector, the strategy included
the promotion of “Ethical-Ecological Investments”68, including a mandatory
declaration of pension funds and an environmental impact assessment for
federal sureties issued by the Austrian Control Bank.
The explicit inclusion of the inancial sector was an important part of the
frameworks and instruments that later came into existence, such as the
Sustainable Development Strategy of the Federal and State Governments
(ÖSTRAT). Created in 2010, the ÖSTRAT is the irst sustainable development
strategy addressing both the national and regional level in Austria. It follows
68 See Project “Ethical-Ecological Investments” by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and
WaterManagement, carried out by ÖGUT: “The aim of the project is to support and consolidate the market for ethicalecological investments in Austria. This is to be achieved with increased public relations and information work, a revival of
supply and demand, and by changing the framework conditions (e.g. mandatory declaration of pension funds withregard
to their investment criteria). Activities to enhance the quality of the market are also planned.” (ÖSTRAT, 2002, Annex p.21)
79
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
the work advanced by the NSTRAT by building up on its objectives and policy
principles. The associated Working Programme (ÖSTRAT, 2011a) includes a
chapter on “Corporate Social Responsibility” and the relevance of inancial
and capital markets.
Both the NSTRAT and the ÖSTRAT include a clear indication of the
mechanisms that should be developed for the promotion of issues related
to sustainable development. The NSTRAT states: “The principle of
motivation instead of punishment must become the guiding principle for
the relationship between enterprises and the administration”. This has been
repeatedly accentuated in the ÖSTRAT. In consequence, incentive-orientated
programmes have been emphasized in Austria and two legislative frameworks
of particular interest for the inancial sector came into existence:
• The Austrian Commercial Code requires large capital companies to
include into the management summary “information about employee
and environmental issues”.
• The 1990 Pension Fund Act was amended in 2005 and now requires
that pension funds report on “ethical, ecological and/or social criteria” if
they applied.
Other legal frameworks for the inancial sector, such as the Austrian Banking
Act, the Federal Act on Investment Funds, the Stock Corporation Act or the
Consumer Credit Act have not incorporated relevant criteria for sustainability
transparency apart from Gender Policies and Corporate Governance.
The Role of the Public Sector
The public sector has a signiicant role in the promotion of sustainability
reporting in Austria. This is further stated in NSTRAT and more profoundly in
the National Action Plan on CSR (NAP CSR), where public institutions, state
and parastatal corporations are encouraged to take a pioneering role in
promoting both sustainability reporting and socially responsible investment.
The irst draft on the NAP CSR was published in 2013. It constituted a
joint effort between the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry,
Environment and Water Management (BMLFUW) and the Ministry of
Economy. The NAP CSR is based on the renewed EU strategy 2011-2014
for Corporate Social Responsibility69. One of the objectives of the ield of
action 3 “Promotion of CSR through incentives” targets the inancial market:
“Incentives through SRI”. Under this objective, four targets are highlighted
69 COM/2011/0681 Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the council, the European
economic and social committee of the regions – A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility.
80
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
and reviewed:
1. Implementation of an expert group for an SRI Codex (including quality
and transparency standards);
2. Promotion of SRI through the active use of governance tools (e.g.
subsidies) with orientation to international standards;
3. Promotion of the Austrian Ecolabel;
4. Integration of SRI criteria and standards in the Pension Fund Act
Contrary to most EU member states, the NAP CSR in Austria is still under
review. The most important recent development is the transposition of the EU
guideline on non-inancial reporting.
BMLFUW initiated or supported various other projects to increase the
sustainability performance and transparency in the inancial sector.
The passive government support and leadership added to the lack of
a demanding legislative framework and wide-ranging incentives have
inluenced various stakeholders of the inancial industry to play a crucial
part in initiating and designing instruments to increase the importance of
corporate sustainability. Informal structures and networks have been of
relevance to establish CSR and reporting in the sector. Some of the projects
that have been developed are:
• Plattform Grünes Geld (“Green Money” Platform): A website
initiated by the BMLFUW and the Austrian Society for Environment and
Technology (ÖGUT) that provides information on “green money”. The
project is part of NSTRAT.
• VÖNIX Sustainability Index: Composed of the leading Austrian
companies listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange in terms of sustainability.
Its partners are the Vienna Stock Exchange, VBV Vorsorgekasse and rfu
sustainability research consulting.
• Austrian Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Ethical Investment
Guidelines: Published in 2011, the guidelines include ethical
considerations and particularly exclusion criteria for shares, bonds,
investment funds, hedge funds and real estate.
In addition, the industry-speciic standards formed one of the most important
drivers for increased quality and quantity of sustainability reporting. The
most utilized are the GRI’s Financial Services Sector Disclosure guidance, the
Principles for Responsible Investment, the IFC’s Environmental and Social
Performance Standards, the Equator Principles and the EUROSIF standards.
81
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Pension Fund Act
A 2005 amendment to the 1990 Pension Fund Act requires pension funds to
report on “ethical, ecological and/or social criteria”. During the parliamentary
debate of the amendment, there was consensus on paragraph 25a, which
speciies the need to include SRI reporting, as proposed in ÖSTRAT.
The funds must declare their investment policy principles for every investment
and risk-sharing group. The declaration must include the ethical, ecological
and/or social criteria for the selection of potential assets. The provisions do
not include speciic requirements on the issues that should be reported.
Pension funds still only apply SRI methodologies to a small extent. There is a
big gap in terms of sustainability reporting between the pension funds and
the severance pay funds. The pension funds argue that their customers, mostly
organizations, do not ask for SRI information and the topic is therefore hardly
on the agenda. While it is mandatory for severance pay funds to address these
issues, it remains voluntary for the pension funds. Various experts claim that this
difference inluenced the success of the introduction of the SRI.
Voluntary Instruments Promoting Disclosure
The two main instruments promoting SRI and sustainability reporting are: the
Austrian Ecolabel for Financial Products (UZ49) and the ÖGUT Sustainability
Certiication. They mainly cover three types of funds, described below:
• Investment Funds: The Association of Austrian Investment Companies
(VÖIG in German) lists 24 management companies with more than
2000 investment funds. In 2014, the AUM amounted to €163bn of which
approximately one tenth are managed for pension funds.
• Pension Funds: The 14 pension funds, consisting of 113 investment
and risk associations (VRG – Veranlagungs- und Risikogemeinschaften)
had €20,2bn AUM in 2015 of which 95% were allocated in investment
funds. The seven multi-company pension funds represent 90% hereof.
• New Severance Payment Funds: There are nine funds in the market. In
2014, these institutions reported €7,3bn AUM.
All instruments account for €174bn AUM, a small amount compared to the
inancial sector size which quadruples the Austrian GDP (€428bn AUM)70,
but that could represent an excellent contribution to the SRI markets with
70 International Monetary Fund. 2013. Austria: Financial Sector Stability Assessment
82
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
accounted for €19,7bn AUM in 201371.
4.4.2.1 AUSTRIAN ECOLABEL FOR FINANCIAL PRODUCTS (UZ49)
Policy Evolution
The Austrian Ecolabel, founded in 1990, aims to supply the customer with
necessary information for environmentally sound products. The Ecolabel for
Sustainable Financial Products (UZ49) was published in 2004 and last reviewed
in 2012. The BMLFUW is the carrier organization in charge and the Austrian
consumer advocacy group (VKI - Verein für KonsumentInneninformation) is
responsible for its administration.
An expert committee is responsible for the development of guidelines.
Chaired by the VKI, the body has representatives of various stakeholder
groups such as governmental representatives, social partners (employee and
employer representatives), NGOs (environmental and consumer advocacy)
and experts from the concerned areas (SRI experts and representatives of
investment funds).
Policy Design
The Ecolabel (UZ49) can be awarded only to investment funds. Its guideline
mentions as potentially positive impacts: the improvement of reporting, better
funding and a higher image on potential investment products. The General
Statute of the Austrian Ecolabel subsumes three central purposes, including
the importance of providing consumers with information on (comparatively)
environmental products and the promotion of market-driven change towards
more environmentally friendly products and services.
The guideline is based on three pillars:
1. Selection criteria;
2. Quality of analytical process; and
3. Transparency
The transparency pillar refers to the EUROSIF-Standard whereof investment
criteria, research process and selection, and implementation are expressed
explicitly. The documentation highlights selected categories of the EUROSIFStandard and includes an annex with a list of questions, including questions to
71 Eurosif. European SRI Study 2014.
83
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
deine the transparency requirement for the user. It uses terms and concepts
well known in ethical investment. A short glossary describes the few technical
terms.
The transparency requirements are obligatory in any case and cannot be
compensated through higher ratings in the other two pillars. The guideline
of the Ecolabel does not specify a particular reporting format required
for meeting the transparency requirements. Despite this, the label follows
EUROSIF and its requirements in practice.
In order to obtain the label the inancial institution is required to hand in
comprehensive documentation on the respective inancial product. An
external auditor evaluates the documents along a structured process. If the
fund does not fulil the transparency guidelines, conditions for improvement
are imposed. If the investment fund does not react, the label would be
withdrawn although this has not happened. Approximately half of the new
applicants receive stipulations on transparency in order to obtain the label.
Policy Monitoring
The Austrian Ecolabel for Financial Products has shown an increase in the
number of participants in recent years, particularly from 2009 onwards. In
October 2014, 43 funds had labelled products that managed €2,4bn, which
accounts for 1,5% of the Austrian AUM. This indicates that the impact of the
instrument on the whole industry is still very limited and there is space for
progress.
A high application of the EUROSIF standard has been observed with
approximately 90% of the certiied funds applying this standard. Moreover,
roughly half of the new companies applying for the label introduce this
standard to comply with the certiication process. Hence, a direct impact
on transparency is visible. For the purpose of this report, only the public
communications of the certiied funds were screened.
Furthermore, the Austrian Federal Chamber for Employees analysed the
publicly available information on 10 Austrian sustainable investment funds.
Apart from the different deinitions of sustainability in general and varied
implementation in the way social and ecological criteria are applied, the study
found a lack of transparency. The supericial deinition of applied criteria and
lacking reasoning for the ethical inclusion of the inancially most important
assets were criticized. Information on the evaluation process (e.g. rating
agencies) and the recurring actualization were considered insuficient.
84
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
4.4.2.2 ÖGUT SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION
Policy Evolution
The Austrian Society for Environment and Technology (OGÜT), founded
in 1985, is an environmental think-tank with around 80 members from
various ields (ministries, public authorities, private industry and enterprises,
environmental NGOs). Since 2004, the ÖGUT tests and certiies severance pay
funds according to their SRI practices.
Since the New Severance Pay Funds were based on employee funds, the
labour union had an interest to allocate the funds in a sustainable way.
Representatives of the union participated in the funds’ committee and were,
therefore, able to exercise more inluence to emphasize this topic. The ÖGUT,
which already had a working group on sustainable investment in place,
conducted a survey to analyse the reality of how far the severance pay funds
had implemented SRI. As a consequence, one of the funds (BAWAG/Allianz)
suggested institutionalising the process to give it an oficial character (label/
certiication). Following this recommendation, the “Green Money” working
group formed a small group of experts, which has been responsible for the
sustainability assessment.
The certiication process includes a hearing with the severance pay funds,
where feedback is given in both directions. Initially, members of the union
participated in the jury as well. The role of ÖGUT changed in time from being
the organizer to being responsible for the whole certiication process. The
BMLFUW has provided inancial means and awards the severance pay funds
with the certiicates, but was not an initiator.
Policy Design
ÖGUT supports the severance pay funds and pension funds in communicating
their leading role in SRI to institutional investors and the public. It was initially
focused on severance pay funds and was later extended to pension funds.
The assessment covers three areas:
1. Principles and processes;
2. Portfolio;
3. Transparency, communication and engagement
The screened funds have to provide the ÖGUT with documentation on their
85
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
SRI-approach and implementation. The certiication includes the aspects on
publicly available information, but there are no deined criteria. Moreover, an
eligible fund has to include a short statement on the yearly account sheet for
the customers.
The labelling process promotes SRI in general, and the impact on
transparency is therefore rather indirect, as companies implementing SRI also
publish information as a consequence. The documentation of ÖGUT states
that transparency for the customer and the public has to be ensured but this
is not further deined. However, at least one major document with information
on the investment policy has to be publicly available.
Moreover, the label guidelines include a mechanism to enable continuous
improvements. Following the certiication process the funds receive a list of
recommendations, which also includes issues on transparency. If a company
does not react repeatedly on these recommendations, a negative impact on
the rating is possible. In addition, depending on the availability of resources,
the ÖGUT publishes a summary report on the certiication of all funds at
irregular intervals.
Policy Monitoring
Many experts share the view that the ÖGUT Sustainability Certiication has
been one of the most important driving factors for the dissemination of SRI in
Austria. In terms of the market reach, the scheme has proven very effective. In
2015, eight out of nine severance pay funds (roughly 90% of the assets under
management in this sector) participated in the certiication process.
The effect in the sub-sector is clearly visible compared to other sectors, most
importantly the pension funds. There is an interesting correlation between the
severance pay funds’ performance and the quality of the SRI policy.
86
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
FIGURE 5
ÖGUT SUSTAINABILITY SCORES
Despite lacking speciic requirements for transparency, the instrument
contributed indirectly to sustainability reporting. The certiication process
successfully introduced investment policy, a core topic of sustainability in the
inancial sector. Due to the process of certiication, companies of the sector
had to familiarise themselves with and understand the effects of including
sustainability topics in their investment policy to further document their SRI
policy. In consequence, a common requirement to report was established and
today every severance pay fund reports on this issue.
There is no speciic evaluation of the inancial industry in Austria. For the
purpose of this publication, rfu sustainability research consulting analysed the
current reporting status of the largest inancial institutions in Austria. Apart
from the general existence of a sustainability report, the application of the
initiatives under scrutiny was evaluated. The indings in subsectors of interest
are presented in the following table:
87
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
TABLE 7
AUSTRIAN COMPARISON OF REPORTING BETWEEN
INVESTMENT FUNDS, SEVERANCE PAY FUNDS, PENSION FUNDS
INVESTMENT FUNDS
SEVERANCE PAY FUNDS
The reporting shows the
sector’s efforts towards
sustainability and its SRI
leading role.
Correlation between
market share and
transparency on SRI:
The ive biggest
management
companies (≈2/3 of
market share) address
SRI systematically and
provide information on
their approaches. The
smaller the companies
are the less information
is publicly available.
All websites have a section
on sustainability and its
relation to the investment
policy.
The majority of
management reports
include information on
non-inancial performance.
A reference to the ÖGUT
certiication is always
present.
As of June 2015, only
44 of approximately
2000 investment funds
existing in the market
have been certiied
according to EUROSIF
(2%).
Three of the nine severance
pay funds publish a
sustainability report or an
integrated report, two of
which are GRI-compliant.
PENSION FUNDS
The sustainability
reporting of all
14 pension funds
hardly provides any
relevant information
and cannot compete
with the severance
pay funds in terms of
depth and breadth.
Only three of
the seven multicompany pension
funds address
sustainability on
their website,
all of which are
organizationally
linked to the three
severance pay
funds that are SRIfrontrunners in the
ÖGUT-certiication.
Conclusion
The Ecolabel and the ÖGUT have certainly signalled the reporting practices
of the three smallest inancial subsectors72 in Austria. However, the response
towards disclosure and transparency, including the use of international
frameworks, varies across groups. That is partially due to the view each sector
has towards the consideration of ESG criteria. A clear understanding of the
importance of ESG disclosure in the inancial sector as a whole is key to
accelerating the reporting dynamics of the sector.
72 Based on assets under management
88
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
5. Case Studies from Around the
World
5.1 Public Sector Reporting in the UK
The HM Treasury 73 in the United Kingdom issues minimum reporting
requirements for all central government bodies, including departments,
non-ministerial departments, non-departmental public bodies and any other
organization required to produce annual inancial reports. It is no longer a
requirement to produce a stand-alone document but reporting organizations
can still do so if they wish. In its March 2016 guidance document, the HM
Treasury sets minimum reporting requirements, including: overall strategy
for sustainability, GHG emissions (Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3), waste
minimisation and management, inite resource consumption, biodiversity
action planning and sustainable procurement. Guidance includes detail on
boundaries, materiality, offsets, and use of external sources. Listed companies
are required to produce Directors and Strategic Reports under the Companies
Act of 2006. In terms of the 2013 Regulations, quoted companies must report
their annual GHG emissions in the Directors’ report
At the end of March 2016, the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial
Disclosures (see chapter 3.3) presented to the UK Financial Stability Board
a report that sets out the scope and high-level objectives and fundamental
principles of disclosure with a view to providing an enduring disclosure
framework. A inal report scheduled for the end of 2016 will set out “speciic
recommendations and guidelines for voluntary disclosure by identifying
practices to improve consistency, accessibility, clarity and usefulness of
climate-related inancial reporting.”
5.2 Indian Reserve Bank Takes Action
The Reserve Bank of India has been issuing circulars and guidance on the
Role of Banks in Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainable Development
and Non-Financial Reporting since 2007. Over the years, a series of actions
aimed at increasing uptake and awareness within the banks has taken place,
including the launch of the S&P ESG India Index in 2008; the release of
73 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ile/279330/PU1632_Sustainability_
Reporting_Guidance.pdf
89
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
national voluntary guidelines on the responsibilities of businesses in 2011;
the launch of the S&P BSE Carbonex; the 2013 launch of the MSCI ESG
India Index. In 2013, the Companies Act was amended to require that 2%
of proits be spent on CSR. In 2015, renewable energy was included under
priority sector lending and the India Banking Association issued guidelines
on responsible banking. Exim Bank of India issues a ive-year US$500 million
green bond and YES Bank issued the irst INR-denominated green bond.
In 2016, the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) made disclosure
compulsory for the Top 100 listed entities (by market capitalisation) – using a
reporting framework based on closed questions (‘yes/no’), with no answers
requiring explanation. SEBI proposed new norms for the issuance and listing
of green bonds.
Research has indicated that an increasing number of inancial institutions are
issuing sustainability reports or have disclosure on corporate responsibility. A
very small proportion of these use existing frameworks such as the GRI, CDP
and UNGC.
5.3 Banking on Change in Nigeria, Bangladesh
and China
In 2012, the Nigerian and Bangladeshi authorities issued green banking
or sustainable banking guidelines. The Chinese Central Bank issued
implementation regulations for the Green Credit Guidelines it had introduced
in 2006. All three address the connection between inancial sector activities
and sustainable development, and formulate guidelines for sustainable
banking policies, strategies, practices, products and services. While reporting
is part of these principles and guidelines, it is not the primary focus. The
Centre for International Governance Innovation issued a 2015 review74 of
impact of these approaches and concluded that: “While compliance in
Nigeria is high, with 90% of the Nigerian banks complying, it is lower in
Bangladesh and in China (30 to 60%).”
The paper concludes that, irstly, the mandatory guidelines have an impact
on the sustainability performance of banks. In all three cases, sustainability
performance increased after the introduction of the guidelines. Secondly,
the inclusion of the banking sector into the development of inancial
sustainability regulations increases the success of the regulation. Thirdly,
activities to support the implementation of inancial sustainability guidelines
74 https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/iles/cigi_paper_no77_web.pdf
90
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
and supervising the compliance with the guidelines are crucial for the
success of inancial sector sustainability regulations. Fourthly, inancial sector
sustainability regulations have a positive impact on the inancial sector’s
inancial performance, stability and sustainability performance. It is the
authors’ view that further research will be needed over time.
BOX D
AUSTRIAN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AWARD (ASRA)
The Austrian Sustainability Reporting Award (ASRA), awarded by the Austrian
Chamber of Chartered Public Accountants and Tax Consultants and organized by
a cooperation of different stakeholders is a voluntary scheme to award Austrian
organizations (independently of the industry, the type of organization and their
size) that have shown a remarkable performance in sustainability reporting. Its goal
is to support and increase quality and quantity of sustainability reports. The ASRA
applies a rating methodology to evaluate the quality of sustainability reports.
By contrast to the ÖGUT certiication and the Ecolabel (UZ49), the main focus is
on transparency. In four meta-topics, 21 criteria are rated along a score evaluation.
In order to evaluate the quality of the reporting and the underlying process, four
different levels of achievement have been deined for each indicator:
1. Vision, Strategy, Materiality
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Strategy
Vision
Performance
Targets
Integration of stakeholders
Materiality
Completeness
2. Principles of Reporting
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
91
Balanced reporting
Comparability
Accurateness
Actuality
Clearness
Reliability and veriiability
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
BOX D
AUSTRIAN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AWARD (ASRA) (CONT.)
3. Internal Processes
a.
b.
c.
d.
Organization and management
Governance
Supply chain / value chain
Programme development
4. Internal Pocesses
a.
b.
c.
d.
Trend
Targets
Ambitiousness and innovative capacity
Compliance classiication according to GRI / IIRC
Sustainability reports or integrated reports can be handed it. There are no further
mandatory requirements in this regard (e.g. third party certiication). In a two-stage
process, the submitted reports are evaluated quantitatively and later discussed
qualitatively in the jury.
The ASRA has been one of various important driving factors for the increasing
transparency and quality of Austrian sustainability reports. It allows deducting
best practice example of the industry, such as VBV Vorsorgekasse and OeKB, who
have won awards in several years. Furthermore, RZB Group was honoured for their
recent improvements.
92
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
6. Best Practice Examples of GoF47
Public Financial Institutions
6.1 ERAFP (France)
The French Public Service Supplementary Pension Scheme, ERAFP75, was
created by the French pension reform law of 21 August 2003. It manages the
retirement beneits of civil servants from the French government and local
authorities through a fully funded scheme. ERAFP is one of the few pension
funds that manages 100% of its €23 billion of assets on a socially responsible
basis.
The ERAFP board approved an SRI policy at the inception of the fund in
2005. Since then, more detailed rating frameworks have been adapted to the
speciic requirements of the different asset classes in which it invests. In 2012,
shareholder engagement guidelines were adopted, followed by a climate
change strategy.
ERAFP’s policy is consistent with its long-term investment horizon. It has
designed an ESG reporting standard as it did not ind a reporting standard
suitable for asset owners. A best in class approach for 40 ESG criteria is used
to assess the compliance of each issuer. It is linked to the UN principles, the
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the International Labour
Organization (ILO) conventions.
ERAFP views its screening processes as essential to ensuring it can provide
‘reasonable assurance’ that it will be able to deliver on the promises it makes
with every contribution it receives from the French civil servants. The fund
follows prudent asset-liability management and solvency frameworks. It uses a
low discount rate to allow it to keep expected returns realistic, and therefore
to make steadier allocation decisions in times of turmoil.
ERAFP considers it a iduciary duty to integrate the analysis of all factors,
including ESG issues that may affect the value of their assets. Their annual
report contains inancial and non-inancial performance and explains the
impact of ESG issues on the inancial performance. Its reporting audience is
its beneiciaries, the investment community and regulatory bodies.
75 www.erafp.fr
93
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ERAFP’s key challenge is the development of the right methodology to assess
the climate change impact indicators. It currently provides information on the
carbon footprint of the equity portfolio and it is working on the methodology
of sovereign bonds and real estate. The carbon intensity of its portfolio is 19%
lower than the benchmark index, the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index).
In 2014, ERAFP worked with the French asset manager Amundi on a
methodology to reduce the carbon footprint of a portfolio of €750 million
managed under an index-based mandate. An additional ilter on the carbon
intensity is applied: 5% of the most polluting companies globally and 20% of
the most polluting of each sector are excluded from the portfolio.
ERAFP’s policy objectives are in line with Article 173 of the Law on Energy
Transition and Green Growth (see chapter 4.1.2) and as such, its efforts are
focused more on incentives to meet SRI requirements rather than being
compliance driven. As a member of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate
Change and signatory to the PRI and other initiatives on climate change, ERAFP
takes part in engagement initiatives towards regulatory authorities.
6.2 Caisse des Dépôts (France)
The Caisse des Dépôts Group is deined under French Law on the
Modernisation of the Economy as a public sector long-term investor serving
general interest and the economic development of the country. It is focused
on innovation and sustainable growth.
The group invests in development projects in France, to catalyse further
private sector inance. In addition, it manages a signiicant portfolio of
inancial assets and subsidiaries.
Caisse des Dépôts is a member of the UN PRI, the Montreal Carbon Pledge,
CDP, UNEP FI and the UN Global Compact. It has 100% of its assets managed
in-house in accordance with an ESG policy. Although not within the formal
scope of the Law on National Commitment for the Environment, it decided in
2012 to comply voluntarily, revamping its sustainability reporting to meet all
of the legal requirements, the GRI indicators, PRI reporting and the indicators
requested by ratings agencies. Since 2014, it has included a voting record in
its sustainability report.
The company has consulted with sustainability experts, ESG brokers, the
ORSE (a French study centre on CSR) and the Institut RSE (Institute for
Corporate Social Responsibility) to ensure that their indicators are in line with
94
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
group policies and can be used for internal strategic planning and project
development as well as external reporting.
Internally, the group’s sustainability reporting informs its strategic decisions.
Externally, the aim is to enhance accountability. The report targets several
audiences and feedback is sought, most recently using a web-based survey.
This provides information for its materiality map and underlying indicators.
The availability and quality of data are problems for non-listed subsidiaries
and SMEs. A further challenge is that of presenting the data in a way that is
user friendly while providing the relevant detail for a large group with varied
activities.
Caisse des Dépôts has commitments to diminish the carbon footprint of its
equity portfolio by 20% by 2020. The main enabler is enhanced shareholder
policy and includes engagement, dialogue and follow-up on issuers’
performance. The group has to comply with Article 173 of the Law on Energy
Transition for Green Growth and its progress will be reported in their annual
reports.
A week before COP21, Caisse de Dépôts announced its commitment to
diminish 20% of the carbon footprint of its equity portfolios by 2020. The main
enabler is its enhanced shareholder policy, which consists of engagement,
dialogue and follow-up of issues’ performance. The group has to comply
with Article 173 of the Law on Energy Transition for Green Growth and
this commitment is part of the actions taken to support the international
and national climate goals. Progress will be relected in the group’s annual
reporting. The group is currently mapping all these themes and indictors
relevant for compliance with Article 173. It is undergoing analysis to identify
methodological gaps and prioritizing the roll out of additional indicators to
reduce double reporting burdens or indicators that are not useful.
6.3 FINDETER (Colombia)
FINDETER (Financiera de Desarollo Territorial), is a public development bank
accessing funds provided by the French Development Agency (AFD) and a
technical cooperation programme which accesses European Union funds. It
also works with the Latin American Investment Facility (LAIF). A further €5m
partnership between FINDETER and the Inter-American Development Bank
(IDB) aims to support and structure priority local development projects.
FINDETER’s role is to provide strategic, inancial and technical support to
Colombian local authorities by strengthening their inancial structures. It
95
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
therefore indirectly inances green and inclusive municipal urban policies,
which have the following objectives:
• Providing access to water and sanitation for the poorest communities,
support responsible water management and improve urban sanitation;
•
Strengthening the household waste collection sector;
•
Supporting the development of eco-friendly urban transport;
• Supporting initiatives to open up dificult neighbourhoods and for the
balanced development of urban territories;
•
Financing social housing development programmes;
•
Producing renewable energy;
•
Helping to strengthen the inancial situation of municipalities
Public reporting on its performance and future outlook is a requirement
of its legal and statutory status as well as of its funders. It has produced a
Sustainable Development report annually for several years with increasing
focus on GRI reporting standards.
Decree 4167 of November 2011 created a change in the bank’s legal structure.
From 2012 it focused on projects fundamental to the company’s vision of
being the Development Bank for the Country’s Infrastructure and the 20122014 Strategic Plan.
The board of directors adopted a signiicant decision regarding the
reorganization of the bank and the addition of new skills in the areas of
technical assistance, project structuring as well as social and environmental
responsibility. Corporate governance was strengthened through the
incorporation of a Code of Ethics into the administrative policies, and
the reinforcement of human resources policies that develop employee
competencies, skills and aptitudes.
After incorporating its new commercial strategy, Findeter’s disbursements
reached $2.32 billion in 2012, of which 90% was used to bolster the national
government in areas such as transport, energy development, drinkable water,
basic sanitation, construction, housing, health and education.
Findeter also deepened its regional presence by applying its credit
resources to 107 municipalities in 26 departments through 1,469 operations.
Commercial management has been oriented towards the inancing of
projects which contribute to improving the competitiveness of the various
regions in areas such as: departmental road plans, mass transport systems,
96
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
the construction and extension of oil pipelines, the transport and distribution
of gas for home use, the construction and improvement of water supply and
sewerage networks, social housing and improvements to infrastructure for
education and health, among others.
Findeter has made a strong contribution to the development of a programme
for 100,000 homes, to technical consultancy in the identiication and
formulation of social housing projects, which was given to close to 800 local
leaders and over 2,500 people. Technical assistance has been provided
for work contracts and auditing to 38 projects, to the value of $390 billion,
beneiting almost 3 million Colombians. Findeter has become a signiicant
partner in the delivery of sustainable development and its easily accessible
sustainability report is a major factor in its transparency and accountability
requirements.
6.4 South African State-Owned Financial
Institutions
State-owned South African companies are governed by the Public Finance
Management Act, the Municipal Finance and Management Act as well as the
Companies Act.
Financial sector state-owned entities, including lending and investment
organizations such as the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), the
Development Bank of South Africa (DBSA), the Land Bank, the Public
Investment Corporation (PIC) and the Government Employees Pension Fund
(GEPF) are also subject to additional legislation. The GEPF is a signatory to
the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and the Code
for Responsible Investment in South Africa (CRISA).
State-owned companies are required to deliver comprehensive audited
annual reports to the relevant minister. The reporting requirements do not
specify the production of a sustainability report, but cover many of the same
elements in addition to comprehensive inancial and governance content.
The Companies Act requires companies to have a social and ethics committee
in place that must, amongst other responsibilities, monitor the company’s
activities with regard to the UN Global Compact principles, the OECD
recommendations on corruption, the Employment Equity Act and the BroadBased Black Economic Empowerment Act.
Therefore, although there is no speciic regulatory or legal requirement to
97
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
produce an annual sustainability report, all of the key state-owned inancial
sector companies do produce signiicant, readily available integrated
reports as envisaged by the voluntary King Code on Corporate Governance.
These reports also meet most of the key expectations of inancial sector
sustainability reports. The integrated annual reports include material ESG
issues as well as a requirement to report on the outcomes of their activities.
The IDC also publishes a GRI index.
The Public Investment Corporation, the principal vehicle for government
investments, including those on behalf of the GEPF, is a signatory to the PRI,
the UN Global Compact and CRISA. It has recently voluntarily engaged with
the CDP (previously the Carbon Disclosure Project).
The PIC publishes, for example, its proxy voting record in relation to its major
listed investments as well as the reasons for its voting decisions. This is a
commitment under CRISA, rather than a speciic regulatory requirement.
The PIC has assets of R1.81 trillion (around US$119 billion) under
management. It is a major investor in South Africa and uses its equity stake
to promote the diversity transformation of the management and ownership
demographics of companies as well as promoting and investing in small
business and infrastructure development.
6.5 Conclusion
Governments can demonstrate leadership by regulating the transparency
disclosures of state-owned inancial services providers. These disclosures also
improve accountability and governance by the State in the disbursement of
tax-payers’ money.
98
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
7. Other Voluntary Disclosure
Initiatives
The number of voluntary codes requiring disclosure of key performance
information and details of underlying processes and methodologies, has
increased signiicantly in recent years, both in terms of the number of codes
and their rapid adoption. Where they exist and cover critical areas of interest,
they may be effective forerunners of policy and regulation. They are devised
by scientiically and technologically knowledgeable groups who seek to make
reporting easier and relevant. The involvement of multiple stakeholders
in their elaboration processes tends to add credibility and ensure uptake.
In addition, their methods of promptly disclosing key indings and trends
ensures relevance and an ability to update the requirements on a regular
basis. Typically, however, these are underfunded and collaboration might work
for both the NGOs that drive them and the governments wishing to promote
material disclosure.
7.1 CDP
The CDP works with market forces (including shareholders, customers and
governments) to improve the management of environmental risk through the
measurement and disclosure of environmental information. It has successfully
encouraged disclosure by thousands of companies and cities worldwide and
it makes information available for business, investment and policy decisionmaking. It engages 822 institutional investors holding US $95 trillion of
assets.76
The CDP claims to hold “the largest collection globally of self-reported
climate change, water and forest-risk data”77. It aims to enable stakeholders,
such as companies, investors and cities, enhance risk mitigation and
make investment decisions that advance sustainable development. Other
projects address issues such as forests, water disclosure and supply chain
environmental risk.
Many view the CDP as a pre-requisite for change but not necessarily a driver
76 www.cdp.net
http://www.cdp.net/en-Us/Pages/about-Us.aspx
77 www.cdp.net
http://www.cdp.net/en-Us/Pages/about-Us.aspx
99
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
of change. There is no question that disclosure of corporate carbon emissions
has increased signiicantly in quality and quantity since the CDP’s inception.
Questions remain, however, about whether the disclosure is leading to
change and how much reliance can be placed on self-reported data.
7.2 Asset Owners Disclosure Project (AODP)
The objective of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project78 is to protect long-term
investment, such as retirement savings, from the risks associated with climate
change79 by improving disclosure and industry best practice. The AODP is
currently only focused on climate change and the potential risks faced by
pension funds if they do not take climate change risk into account when
providing for the long term inancial needs of pension holders in a rapidly
changing world. One thousand of the world’s largest pension funds presently
manage an excess of US$52 trillion, however, the amount invested in lowcarbon assets is of less than 2% of this igure.80
The AODP enables stakeholders, members and the public to differentiate
between asset owners, such as pension funds, who are managing the longterm risks in their portfolios that are associated with climate change, and
those who are not. To that end, it measures how asset owners are managing
the challenge in terms of rapidity and effectiveness and drives a better
management of climate change-related risks in their investment portfolios.
The principle underpinning the AODP is that it is an asset owner’s core
business to prove that it has assessed a risk and then decided to mitigate it
or carry it. This is particularly important as the funds provide for the long-term
future of millions of people through their pension savings. The AODP requires
asset owners to disclose how they mitigate that risk through the four portfolio
mitigation options of avoidance, insurance, diversiication and hedging. In
addition, they have a responsibility to demonstrate the impacts of mitigation
and the potential repercussions in case the risk manifests itself. The AODP’s
experience is that disclosure frequently highlights that risk is not being
managed. The impact of the AODP has been positive with many asset owners
switching their capital to cleaner investments in order to mitigate climate
change risk. The AODP seeks input into its annual analysis from the relevant
asset owners but where none is provided, the pension fund is assessed on
publically available information.
78 www.aodproject.net
79 http://aodproject.net/about-us/our-objectives/
80 DB Climate Change Advisors, January 2010
100
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
7.3 Equator Principles
The Equator Principles (EP) is a risk management framework for inancial
institutions to identify, evaluate and manage social and environmental risk
in projects81. It is primarily intended to provide a minimum standard for
due diligence to support responsible risk decision-making. Signatories are
required to disclose application information.
The EP apply globally, to all industry sectors and to four inancial products,
above certain thresholds:
1. Project Finance Advisory Services;
2. Project Finance;
3. Project-Related Corporate Loans; and
4. Bridge Loans
To date, 84 Equator Principles Financial Institutions (EPFIs) in 35 countries
have embraced the EP. Together, they account for more than 70% of
international project inance debt in emerging economies82.
EPFIs apply the EP to their internal policies in the environmental and social
areas, as well as in their standards and procedures for inancing projects.
They also commit to reporting on EP implementation. Projects that are not EP
compliant will not receive inancing or corporate loans by EPFIs.
EPFIs also apply the EP to an existing project in cases where its expansion
or upgrading may cause considerable social and environmental risks and
impacts, or signiicantly modify the nature or intensity of an existing impact.
One of the EP successes is in agreeing the IFC Performance Standards as a
common framework for adjudicating risk and performance. This overcomes
the challenge of operating in multiple jurisdictions where legislation is not
always current or fully implemented. EP banks are able to negotiate with other
parties participating in the large and complex deals that typically fall within
the deinitions to use the IFC Performance Standards.
81 www.equator-principles.com
82 http://www.equator-principles.com/index.php/members-reporting
101
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
7.4 World Federation of Exchanges (WFE)
In a November 2015 announcement, the WFE83 released its guidance
to member exchanges on the incorporation of disclosure around 34
key performance indicators. These include energy consumption, water
management, CEO pay ratios, gender diversity, human rights, child and
forced labour, temporary worker rates, corruption and anti-bribery, tax
transparency and other issues. WFE offered exchanges guidance on rolling
out enhanced sustainability disclosure and a means of meeting commitments
to the UN’s Sustainable Stock Exchanges initiative84.
The WFE represents 64 public stock, futures and options exchanges as well
as Central Clearing Parties (CCPs). These cover over 44,000 companies –
representing a US$64 trillion market capitalization and a trading value of
US$76 trillion list on WFE exchanges – equivalent to more than 75% of the
global GDP. The guidance is provided for voluntary adoption by exchanges or
for adaptation to local market conditions.
7.5 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
The GRI85 was the pioneer in developing general sustainability reporting
guidelines and sector speciic supplements and guidance. It remains the most
widely used framework. Its modus operandi includes signiicant stakeholder
consultation that encompasses business, governments, academia and civil
society and experts. The GRI maintains a signiicant database of sustainability
reports.
7.6 Conclusion
Signiicant experience and expertise in developing indicators and process
assessments exists within NGOs and private sector-led voluntary initiatives.
By working with these initiatives, policy makers can build on and improve
transparency and disclosure around key sustainability issues. Further, regular
research of the outcomes resulting from these voluntary initiatives can assist
policy makers in identifying and targeting gaps that currently exist.
83 http://www.world-exchanges.org
84 http://www.sseinitiative.org
85 http://globalreporting.org
102
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
8. List of Abbreviations
ABBREVIATION
MEANING
€
Symbol for Euro, the Currency of the European
Union
AAAA
Addis Ababa Action Agenda
Abrapp
Brazilian Association of Closed Pension Funds
AFA
French Insurance Association
AFEP
French Association of Private Companies
AFG
French Association of Financial Management
Anpid
National Association of Investment Banks
AODP
Asset Owners Disclosure Project
Apimec
Association of Capital Markets Analysts and
Investment Professionals
ARAS
Environmental and Social Risk Assessment
(Colombia)
ASRA
Austrian Sustainability Reporting Awards
AUM
Assets Under Management
BAWAG/Alliance
Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft (Austria’s 4th
largest bank)
BBBEE
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment
BM&BOVESPA
Brazilian Stock Exchange
BMLFUW
Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry,
Environment and Water Management
BVC
Colombia Stock Exchange
CCP’s
Central Clearing Parties
CDP
Previous acronym for Carbon Disclosure Project.
The organization is now simply CDP.
CIES
Employee Savings Label
CISE
ISE Governance Committee (Brazil)
103
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ABBREVIATION
MEANING
COLEQTY
Colombia Equity Index
COLIR
Colombian Index for Investor Relations and
Sustainability Disclosure
COP21
21st Conference of the Parties to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC)
CRISA
Code for Responsible Investment in South Africa
CSR
Corporate Social Responsibility
DFIs
Development Finance Institutions
EP
Equator Principles
EPFI
Equator Principles Financial Institutions –
signatories to the EP principles
ERAPF
French Public Service Supplementary Pension
Scheme
ESG
Environmental Social Governance
EUROSIF
European Sustainable Investment Forum
FBF
French Banking Federation
FGV
Getulio Vargas Foundation (Brazil)
FFSA
French Federation of Insurance Companies
FIR
Forum for Responsible Investment, also known as
French SIF (Social Investment Forum)
GoF47
Group of Friends of Paragraph 47
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative
GRI G3, G3.1, G4
Versions of the Global Reporting Initiative’s
guidelines
GVces
Getulio Vargas’ Centre of Studies on
Sustainability
Ibase
Brazilian Institute of Social And Economic
Analysis
IBGC
Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance
104
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ABBREVIATION
MEANING
IFC
International Finance Corporation: private sector
arm of the World Bank
IIRC
International Integrated Reporting Council
ILO
International Labour Organization
Institut RSE
Institute for Corporate Social Responsibility
IR
Integrated Reporting
ISE
Corporate Sustainability Index (Brazilian SRI
Index)
ISO 26000
International Standards Organization guidance
standard on Corporate Social Responsibility
JSE SRI Index
Johannesburg Stock Exchange Socially
Responsible Investment Index
Label ISR
French SRI Label
Loi NRE
French Law on New Economic Regulations
MEDEF
French Business Confederation
MEEM
French Ministry of Environment, Energy and the
Sea
NAP CSR
National Action Plan on Corporate Social
Responsibility
NSTRAT
Austrian Strategy for Sustainable Development
NYSE
New York Stock Exchange
OeKB
Austrian Central Securities Depository
ÖGUT
Austrian Society for Environment and Technology
ORSE
Observatory for Corporate Social Responsibility
ÖSTRAT
Austrian Federal and State Governments’
Sustainable Development Strategy
PNBE
Pensamento Nacional das Bases Empresariais
(Brazilian association for entrepreneurial
modernism and the re-democratisation of Brazil)
PRI
Principles for Responsible Investment
105
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
ABBREVIATION
MEANING
rfu
Reinhard Friesenbichler Consulting
Rio+20
United Nations Conference on Sustainable
Development (held in Rio de Janeiro in 2012 on
the 20th anniversary of the 1992 Earth Summit)
SDGs
Sustainable Development Goals
SMEs
Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
SR
Sustainability Reports/Reporting
SRI
Socially Responsible Investment
TEEC
Energy and Ecological Transition for Climate
Label
UCITS
Undertakings for Collective Investment in
Transferable Securities
UNEP
United Nations Environment Programme / UN
Environment
UNGC
United Nations Global Compact
US$
Symbol for United States Dollars
VBV Vorsorgekasse
Austrian Provident Fund
VKI
Austrian Association for Consumer Information
VÖIG
Association of Austrian Investment Companies
VÖNIX
Vienna Stock Exchange Sustainability Index
VRG
Austrian Association of Investment and Risk
Analysts
WFE
World Federation of Exchanges
106
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
9. Index of Tables, Figures and
Graphs
Tables
Table 1: Key Industries within the Financial Services Sector...............................15
Table 2: General requirements of Article 224 and Article 173...........................47
Table 3: Disclosure of ESG integration in investment policy...........................48
Table 4: ISE Governance structures.....................................................................69
Table 5: ISE Questionnaire criteria........................................................................71
Table 6: SRI Index areas of measurement........................................................77
Table 7: Austrian comparison of reporting between
investment Funds, Severance Pay Funds, Pension Funds..................................88
Figures & Graphs
Framework for Policy Evaluation...........................................................................11
Figure 1: Sustainability reports per region...........................................................20
Figure 2: Reports per sector: G4..........................................................................20
Figure 3: Reports per sector: G3/3.1....................................................................21
Figure 4: Comparison of sector representation of GRI reports..........................21
Figure 5: ÖGUT Sustainability Scores...................................................................87
Boxes
Box A: Article 173...................................................................................................53
Box B: South African pension fund changes........................................................56
Box C: SRI labels in France....................................................................................63
Box D: Austrian Sustainability Reporting Award (ASRA)....................................91
Appendix
Appendix 1 Comparison of Approaches in GoF47 countries..........................108
Appendix 2 Tool for policy evaluation................................................................116
107
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
A.1. Comparison of Approaches in
GoF47 countries
POLICY
OBJECTIVES
REPORTING
SPECS.
All Austrian
organizations
independent of
industry, size or
type
CSR National
Action Plan
addresses the issue
of “Transparency
and Credibility” as
one of its ive ields
of activities and
includes targets
on SRI.
Voluntary
Austrian
Commercial
Code
Credit
institutions
and insurance
companies;
Large
companies
(≥ €20 million
total assets, €40
million total
sales or 250
employees)
– Not explicit
–Mandatory
– §243(5) and
267(2) include
requirements
for non-inancial
reporting;
environmental
and employee
information which
must be included
in the management
summary.
–Compliance
is ensured
through the
auditing of
corporate
accounts.
ÖGUT
sustainability
certiications
Severance Pay
Funds and
Pension Funds
Support the
severance pay funds
and pension funds
to communicate
their leading role in
SRI to institutional
investors and the
public.
Voluntary
ÖGUT
Responsible
Investment
Standard
Asset
Management
Companies
Black list of
problematic
companies and
nations applied
to all assets of a
company
Voluntary
POLICY
APPLIES TO
ÖSTRAT /
NSTRAT
AUSTRIA
COUNTRY
108
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
MULTI
STAKEHOLDER
CONSULTATION
CHARACTERISTICS
POLICY EFFECT(S)
22 social partners
and civil servants
from various
ministries, public
and academics
participated.
In terms of reporting it makes
reference to the GRI framework.
In terms of SRI it makes
references to UNPRI, EUROSIF
and the Austrian Ecolabel for
Financial Products.
– Marginal and rather ineffective
in terms of sustainability
reporting as no system has
been adapted systematically by
companies.
–Active lobbying
for a more
precise deinition
of §243 which did
not succeed due
to the opposition
of economic
representatives
– No speciic list of indicators
but there is a reference to the
EU recommendations which
includes a number of examples.
– Not a wide implementation in
the inancial sector.
ÖGUT, experts,
inancial service
provider,
consultants,
ministry, labor
union, Austrian
consumers
association and
the sciences.
– The assessment covers three
areas: (a) principles and processes
(b) portfolio (c) transparency,
communication, engagement,
documentation on SRI approach
and implementation.
ÖGUT,
consultants and
the inancial
service.
109
– The publication of
environmental and employee
information is limited to related
economic material issues leaving
on a side materials for SD.
– The objectives set for SRI have
not been put into practice.
– There are gaps in quality,
quantity and materiality of the
reports.
– One of the most important
driving factors of SRI in Austria: In
2015, eight out of nine severance
pay funds participated in the
certiication process.
– Indirect impact on transparency.
– Makes references to the Austrian
Ecolabel for inancial products.
First divestment standard in
Austria with a potential broad
effect, since the scope covers
all inancial assets of a company.
However, due to its recent
implementation, no conclusion
can be drawn at the moment.
It is too early to tell as the
standard was only implemented
in 2015. It is however hoped
that the instrument would
be an important component
for moving towards more
sustainable capital markets.
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
AUSTRIA
COUNTRY
REPORTING
SPECS.
Pension
funds
(Voluntary)
except
Severance
pay funds
(Mandatory)
and
personal
pension
schemes
– Not explicit
– Mandatory
– Report
on ethical,
ecologic
and/or social
criteria
– Set of
indicators not
speciied
Investment
funds
Provide
customers with
comparable
information
and promote
a market
change towards
environmentally
friendly
products and
services.
APPLIES TO
Pension
Fund Act
Austrian
Ecolabel (UZ
49)
Austrian
Sustainability
Reporting
Award (ASRA)
110
POLICY
OBJECTIVES
POLICY
Private sector,
government
sector, public
sector and
NGOs
Support and
increase quality
and quantity of
sustainability
reports.
– Voluntary
– The reporting
form is not
speciied, but its
guidelines contain
information on
the transparency
requirements.
– External auditors
evaluate the
document.
Voluntary
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
MULTI
STAKEHOLDER
CONSULTATION
CHARACTERISTICS
POLICY EFFECT(S)
– SRI actors such as
ÖGUT were part of
the consultation of
the text.
Low implementation of
the SRI methodology
was partly due to a low
demand.
There is a big gap in the quality
of information and sustainability
reporting between the pension
funds and severance pay
funds. Pension funds do not
achieve in their reporting the
same depth and breadth as
severance pay funds. Of the
14 pension funds, the seven
corporate pension funds report
very little relevant information.
Only three of the remaining
seven multi-company pension
funds address sustainability on
their websites. Unsurprisingly,
the VBV-Pensionskasse
AG, Valida Pension AG and
Bonus Pensionkasse AG are
organizationally linked to the
three severance pay funds
that are SRI-frontrunners in the
ÖGUT certiication.
– Three pillars: selection
criteria, quality of analytical
process and transparency.
– 90% of the certiied funds
apply the EUROSIF standard and
nearly half of the new companies
applying for the label introduce
it.
– SRI actors lobbied
for a voluntary
passage on SRI in
the early stages
of the “New
Severance Payment
Act”. This was not
implemented due to
low interest among
Parliamentarians.
However, the
amendment of the
Pension Fund Act,
developed around the
same time, included
a requirement for SRI
reporting.
Experts, auditors
of funds, inancial
service provider,
ÖGUT, economic
chambers and
NGOs
– The transparency criteria
is mandatory and cannot be
compensated through higher
ratings in the other two pillars.
– Its documentation refers
explicitly to the EUROSIFStandard categories and the
Arista Quality Standard.
Safeguarded
through the
partner that jointly
support the ASRA
and through the
members of the jury
– To evaluate the quality of
reporting and its underlying
process it deines four metatopics with 21 criteria. These
are: (1) vision, strategy and
materiality (2) internal process
(3) reporting principles (4)
performance
– Makes reference to GRI and
the IIRC.
111
– Constant increase in the
number of funds.
– Important driving factor
for increased transparency
and quality in the Austrian
sustainability reports.
– It has the most detailed
approach to transparency
compared to the other
instruments that were analysed.
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
POLICY
APPLIES TO
Corporate
Sustainability
Index (ISE
Top 40 of the
issuers of the
200 most liquid
shares on
BM&BOVESPA
that fulil the
eligibility
criteria
COLOMBIA
112
POLICY
OBJECTIVES
– Build an objective
tool to compare
the performance of
listed companies,
highlighting those
committed to SD
and differentiate
them for investors
with other interests,
such as short-term
inancial return.
– Encourage the
launch of new SRI
funds, becoming
a benchmark for
their performance
comparison.
BRAZIL
COUNTRY
Article 96
of Law
1328 of
2009
Financial and
insurance
system, and
the security
market
– Promote the
adoption and
development of
voluntary social
responsibility
activities.
– Create a tool
to disclose the
impact of CSR
activities.
REPORTING
SPECS.
– Voluntary
– Sustainability
performance
assessment
through a
questionnaire
structured
on seven
dimensions:
General, Nature
of Product,
Climate Change,
EconomicFinancial,
Corporate
Governance,
and Social and
Environmental
responsibility
– Mandatory
– Principlesbased
– Establishes
periodicity,
form and
disclosure
channels
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
MULTI STAKEHOLDER
CONSULTATION
– Joint effort of
Bovespa Operations
Superintendent, the
creators of Ethical fund
(ABN Amro Real SRI
fund), the Brazilian
Institute of Corporate
Governance, the Center
for Sustainability Studies
of the Getulio Vargas
Foundation and the Ethos
Institute, among others.
– The most debated topics
were sector exclusions
and the triple bottom line
(Social, Environmental and
Economic dimensions).
CHARACTERISTICS
– The questionnaire makes
references to national and
international standards and
initiatives (e.g. Brazilian Central
Bank resolution on S&E policies,
the protocol verde, GRI and
CDP).
– The ISE methodology is based
on company performance, a basic
questionnaire, and an assessment
of documents submitted to
support the information provided.
– The questionnaire includes a
question about an authorization
to disclose the company’s
answers on the ISE website, which
is worth 15 points, having the
highest score among all.
– There is dificulty in using the
same questionnaire to assess
companies of different economic
sectors.
Consultation with
experts and the public
in the drafting of the
bill,
– The use of sustainability
reports to comply with the
law is common and not
limited to its requirements.
Environmental, social and
human rights issues are
reported.
– A survey of 204 companies
showed that 88% complied
with the requirements.
113
POLICY
EFFECT(S)
– It serves as a
reference guide
for initiating
sustainability
practices as well as
for their continuous
improvement even
for companies that
were never part of
the index.
– Following the
introduction of the
ISE, there was a
rapid shift to the
creation of new
SRI funds, but
most of them have
remained relatively
small.
– Limited success in
serving as a benchmark for larger
investors, as it has
a relatively small
number of member
companies.
Positive and
effective impact
on the way
institutions have
been working
to establish CSR
policies and
prepare their
reports.
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
SOUTH AFRICA
FRANCE
COUNTRY
114
APPLIES
TO
POLICY
OBJECTIVES
Article
224 of
the Law
N° 2010788 of
12 July
2010 and
Article
173
Portfolio
managers
– Promote
Sustainable
Responsible
Investment via
employee savings.
Article
173 of
the Law
N° 2015992 of 17
August
2015 on
Energy
Transition
for the
Green
Growth
Institutional
Investors
SRI index
Issuers
Companies
listed on
the JSE and
in the FTSE
Russell/JSE
All share
index
POLICY
– Requires reporting
of the ESG criteria in
the investment policy
and reporting of SRI
UCITS.
– Greater
transparency and
contribution to
climate change.
REPORTING
SPECS,
– Mandatory
– Principles-based
– Guidance Material
is provided by
the Forum for
Responsible
Investment (FIR).
– Requires reporting
in the annual
report and in the
company’s website.
– Mandatory
– Principles-based
– Extend the scope
of Article 224 to
institutional investors.
– Reporting of
indirect emissions
and stress tests.
– Provide a tool
for a broad holistic
assessment of company
policies and practices,
identifying those that
integrate the principles
of the triple bottom line
and good governance
in their business
activities.
– Serve as a facilitation
vehicle for responsible
investment and
contribute to the
development of
responsible business
practices.
– Voluntary
– Speciic indicators
subject to “apply or
explain”.
– Integrated
reporting.
– Guidance Material
is provided by JSE.
– Third party
veriication is
encouraged through
the kings code.
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
MULTI
STAKEHOLDER
CONSULTATION
– Extensive process
including state,
employers and
employers (unions)
representatives,
local authorities and
NGOs.
CHARACTERISTICS
POLICY EFFECT(S)
The policy does not have
any built-in compliance
mechanisms and there are
no penalties or sanctions
associated in case of noncompliance.
The policy was evaluated
one year after entering into
force. The disclosure rate
was satisfactory but showed
that there was room for
improvement which led to
Article 173.
– First legislation in the
world requiring reporting the
portfolio’s indirect emissions.
Not implemented yet.
– Working groups,
operational
committees and a
public consultation.
N/A
– It integrates climate risks in
the inancial risks.
Participants of the
JSE
115
– The index includes speciic
reporting requirements in
terms of the content and
quantity of indicators. It varies
across sectors depending on
its “impact classiication”.
– SRI index is used as
reporting benchmark in some
companies.
– JSE and FTSE Russell are
partners in improving the
index ESG indicators. This
new version contains speciic
references to various initiatives
such as the UN Global
Compact, the UN Principles
for Responsible Investment,
various sector-speciic
initiatives and the UN Business
Principles on Human Rights.
– New stakeholder groups
such as NGOs, consulting
groups and others are
becoming more interested in
ESG topics.
– Two reporting awards are
based on the SRI index.
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
A.2. Tool for Policy Evaluation
POLICY EVOLUTION
Existing policy environment, ie. other
supporting CSR policy requirements
CONTEXT
National drivers and pressures for increased
transparency
Main stakeholders involved in consultation
PROCESS
Negotiation of policy content (main points
contested, how resolved)
OTHER
REVELANT
INPUTS
---
REFERENCES
---
116
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
GUIDANCE
Describe the national background of trends and
debates from which the reporting policy emerged.
Out-line the CSR-related policies in place that
existed before the devel-opment / implementation
of the reporting policy. If the policy has been
adopted relatively recently or is currently being
developed, de-scribe the current context. If the
policy has been in place for several years, describe
the historical con-text. Include policies run by
other regulatory institutions.
List as bullet points the key partic-ipants and their
main position(s) on proposed legislation (on aspects or as a whole).
Describe briely the main issues debated during
the policy’s devel-opment e.g. in parliament or
through public consultation. You may include
the scope, application, terminology, expected
costs, en-forcement mechanisms etc. Who was
advocating? Was a compro-mise reached between
key stake-holders?
---
117
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
– GRI’s ‘Carrots and
Sticks’ publication
– Government websites
– Other national CSR
websites
– Google search for
academic studies,
surveys and other
research
– Google search for
Government websites
– Other national CSR
websites
– Google search for
written submissions to
policy-makers
– Google search for
academic studies,
surveys and other
research
---
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
POLICY DESIGN
OBJECTIVES
Clarity of need for policy and its goal
Who does the policy apply to?
APPLICABILITY
Link to other corporate reporting legislations
(if any)
SCOPE AND
REQUIREMENTS
118
Scope of defined issues to be reported on
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
GUIDANCE
Does the policy text or related documents
clearly describe why the policy is needed and
its objectives?
POSSIBLE SOURCES
– Policy text and related
guidance documents issued
by the responsible ministry
or any other au-thoritative
source (e.g. business
association or chamber of
commerce).
List the stated scope of intended subjects or
inancial institutions, including any thresholds
for inclusion (e.g. number of employees,
revenues, listed companies, institutional
investors, portfolio managers).
Does the policy text cross-reference any other
reporting legislation, e.g. annual i-nancial
or environmental reporting re-quirements? If
so, does this have an im-pact on the policy’s
applicability? Consider e.g. if the threshold for
being subjected to the sustainability reporting
legislation is deined by other legislation, or
whether it was created to speciically regulate
sus-tainability reporting in the inancial sector.
List the stated scope of subject matters to
be addressed in the reporting (qualitatively
and/or quantitatively). Is the scope deined in
precise and unambiguous terms or is it general
and potentially vague? Does it contain speciic
disclosure requirements for certain inancial
products/services? Consider for instance how
detailed the compliance of the ESG criteria
must be in investment decisions. The focus
here is ‘what must reporters report on and how
they should report’ – the speciied scope could
for example be a broad sustainability policy
or it could be speciic ESG/CSR topics that is
compiled following an international framework
(SASB, GRI).
119
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
POLICY DESIGN
Requirements for the compilation and
publication of reporting
Level of prescriptiveness
SCOPE AND
REQUIREMENTS
Level of complexity
120
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
GUIDANCE
Describe any requirements (contained in
the policy or in related guidance) for how
a reporter must/should compile their account and how it must be published
Comment on the level of prescriptiveness
of the legislation, i.e. to what extent does
the text specify exactly the conditions
for compliance and how this should be
achieved. The focus here is ‘what does the
policy explicitly require reporters to do to
be in compliance, beyond addressing any
deined sustainability topics’. This could
for instance be prescriptions on where the
information must be published, its duration, the period and format.
POSSIBLE SOURCES
– Policy text and related
guidance documents issued
by the responsible ministry
or any other au-thoritative
source (e.g. business
association or chamber of
commerce).
Comment on the level of complexity of the
legislation, i.e. to what extent does the text
provide clear, short and simple instructions
or guidance. Consider if it is complex
because it is amending or repealing previous
legislations. Consider if the volume and/
or quality of the text is a barrier to the
user’s experience of the legislation – e.g.
consider if there is extensive use of legal
and technical terms (potentially leading to a
perception of disproportionate complexity).
Consider if the text introduces poorlydeined, rarely-used or similar-looking
concepts. Consider if the text contains long
sentences and sections that can complicate
its comprehension, including if the text
irst contains a rule and then a lengthy list
of exceptions or special circumstances.
Consider if there are cross-references to
other reporting legislation that may increase
complexity for the reader.
121
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
POLICY DESIGN
REPORTING
APPROACH
Rules-based or principles-based (i.e. comply
or explain)
INCENTIVES
AND PENALTIES
Compliance mechanisms and verification
International frameworks
REFERENCES
Regional and/or transnational policies
National policies
OTHER
RELEVANT
INPUT
---
REFERENCES
---
122
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
GUIDANCE
POSSIBLE SOURCES
Does the text comprise a set of detailed
prescriptive rules, or does it present more
high-level, broadly stated principles to deine
the standards reporters must respect for the
overall elaboration of the report?
– Policy text and
related guidance
documents issued
by the responsible
ministry or any
other au-thoritative
source (e.g.
business association
or chamber of
commerce).
Does the policy have any built-in mechanisms
to ensure compliance? Describe any incentives
as well as any penalties or sanctions for noncompliance. (e.g. possibility of being removed
from an index).
– Other related
policies, if relevant.
Does the legislation and/or any accompa-nying
guidance make reference to iwnterna-tional
frameworks for sustainability / CSR, e.g. UN
Global Compact, GRI, OECD etc.? The reference
may be explicit or im-plicit, and it may be in the
actual policy or in related guidance.
Does the legislation and/or any accompa-nying
guidance make reference to any re-gional
and/or transnational policy or di-rective? The
reference may be explicit or implicit, and it may
be in the actual policy or in related guidance.
Does the legislation and/or any accompanying
guidance make reference to any national policy
or instrument relating to sustainability / CSR /
corporate governance / environmental / health
and safety / corruption etc.?
-----
123
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
POLICY MONITORING
INTERPRETATION
AND RESPONSE
Reporters’ responses in annual reporting
(minimum compliance vs comprehensive)
EFFECT (IMPACT)
OF POLICY ON
REPORTING
What has been the effect (impact) of policy
on reporting?
124
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
GUIDANCE
POSSIBLE SOURCES
Collect evidence from different sources about
how reporters have responded in practice e.g.
contact local auditors or con-sultants who may
have reviewed many reports and ask for their
assessment.
– Websites
(government,
ministerial etc.)
Describe the overall effect (estimated or known through
concrete evidence) of the policy on sustainability
reporting. For countries where the policy is relatively
recent, focus on interpretation and compliance. For
countries where the policy has been in place for several
years, focus on beyond-compliance reporting and
evidence of integration into corporate management.
For illustrative purposes, consider:
– whether there is evidence of modiied reporting
practices and content in accordance with policy
requirements
– whether reported information appears to be used
for corporate management decisions (e.g. investment/
divestment decisions, improved human resources
management, improved natural resources use,
improved relationships to local communities, etc)
– Local auditors
– Government
websites
– Other national
CSR websites
or authoritative
sources (e.g.
business association
or chamber of
commerce)
– Google search for
academic studies,
surveys and other
research
– whether reported information appears to be used by
external stakeholders (e.g. regulator, rating agencies,
investees, consumer associations, etc)
– whether additional external stakeholders have
developed as a result of the introduction of said policy
(monitoring groups/ watchdogs, rating agencies,
consulting irms, specialized software companies,
NGOs, etc)
– indirect effects (development of awards, indexes,
labels, additional voluntary initiatives, etc)
– whether it opened the debate for initiatives applying
to speciic types of inancial institutions/services
– whether there is an increase in the range of inancial
products including ESG criteria
– whether the policy has inspired other regulatory
institutions to adopt ESG reporting policies
125
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
POLICY MONITORING
Assess the policy against its objectives
(internal effectiveness)
AMBITION
AND REALISM
OF POLICY
(SUCCESS)
Assess the policy against international
expectations / practice / norms (external)
OTHER RELEVANT
INPUT
---
REFERENCES
---
126
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
GUIDANCE
POSSIBLE SOURCES
Evaluate the overall ambition and success of the
policy. Consider whether there is suficient evidence
to identify causality between the policy and the
described impact. Consider if the policy has had any
unintended effects (both positive and negative). For
illustrative purposes, consider for example:
– Government
websites
– whether the number of reporting inancial
institutions has increased after policy implementation
(if applicable to the said policy’s objectives)
– whether the quality and/or quantity of reported
information has increased (if applicable to the said
policy’s objectives)
– whether external stakeholders can conirm
increased transparency by reporting inancial
institutions
– Other national
CSR websites
or authoritative
sources (e.g.
business association
or chamber of
commerce)
– Google search for
academic studies,
surveys and other
research
Evaluate the policy in the context of international good
practice. Considering the responses given above:
– How would you summarise the extent to which the
policy lives up to the international ‘good practice’ policy
elements outline in this framework?
– How closely does this policy align with international
developments and current expectations around
sustainability reporting in the inancial sector?
– Where a policy is not yet fully formulated or
implemented, does it show promise of alignment with
international good practice?
---
---
127
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
About the Economy Division of UN
Environment
Set up in 1975, three years after UN Environment began, the
Economy Division provides solutions to decision-makers and helps
change the business environment by ofering platforms for multistakeholder dialogue and cooperation, innovative policy options,
pilot projects and creative market mechanisms to improve the
quality of the environment and the well-being of citizens.
Within UN Environment, the Economy Division has the mandate of delivering on
environmental sustainability through technology, industry and economic policy by
addressing environmental issues at global and regional levels, providing leadership and
encouraging partnerships, and by informing and enabling nations and people to improve
their quality of life without compromising that of future generations.
The Division plays a leading role in three of UN Environment’s seven strategic priorities,
namely in climate change, chemicals and waste, and resource eiciency.
The Office of the Director, located in Paris,
coordinates activities through:
> The Chemicals and Waste Branch (Geneva, Paris and Osaka), which catalyses global
actions to bring about the sound management of chemicals, the improvement of chemical
safety and the management of waste.
> The International Environmental Technology Centre - IETC (Osaka)
promotes the collection and dissemination of knowledge on Environmentally Sound
Technologies with a focus on waste management. The broad objective is to enhance
the understanding of converting waste into a resource and thus reduce impacts on
human health and the environment (land, water and air).
> OzonAction (Paris) supports the phase-out of ozone depleting substances
in developing countries and countries with economies in transition to ensure
implementation of the Montreal Protocol.
> The Economy and Trade Branch (Geneva), which helps countries to integrate
environmental considerations into economic and trade policies, and works with the
inance sector to incorporate sustainable development policies. This branch is also
charged with producing green economy reports.
> The Energy, Climate, and Technology (Paris, Nairobi, and Copenhagen), which
fosters energy and transport policies for sustainable development and encourages
investment in renewable energy and energy eiciency.
> The Sustainable Lifestyles, Cities and Industry Branch (Paris), which delivers
support to the shift to sustainable consumption and production patterns as a core
contribution to sustainable development.
The Economy Division works with many partners (other UN
agencies and programmes, international organizations,
governments, non-governmental organizations, business, industry,
the media and the public) to raise awareness, improve the transfer
of knowledge and information, foster technological cooperation
and implement international conventions and agreements.
For more information,
see www.unep.org/dtie
United Nations Environment Programme
P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Tel: +254-(0)20-762 1234
Fax: +254-(0)20-762 3927
Email:
[email protected]
Web: www.unep.org
This publication builds upon the work developed by the GoF47 for
Evaluating Public Policies in Corporate Sustainability Reporting,
with a speciic focus on the inancial sector. It provides an overview
of international (mainly intergovernmental) initiatives in the ield of
inancial sector transparency, before moving to the description and
evaluation of public policies and other initiatives on sustainability
reporting in the inancial sector in 7 GoF47 countries (Austria, Brazil,
Colombia, France, Norway, South Africa, Switzerland), illustrated
by best practice examples of collaboration between government
and inancial institutions. Building on the analysis, it provides
recommendations to policy-makers to enhance inancial sector
transparency, thus directly contributing to the Addis Ababa Action
Agenda, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
and the SDGs.