Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Resolving Hiatus by Diphthongisation in Romanian

2015

Phonetics and Phonology in Europe (PaPE), Clare College, Cambridge, Marea Britanie (poster presentation) Resolving Hiatus by Diphthongisation in Romanian Oana Niculescu Dep. of Linguistics, Faculty of Letters, University of Bucharest, Romania [email protected] 1. The data. Among Romance languages, Romanian displays a robust diphthong / hiatus contrast, the heterosyllabic [iV] sequences being the preferred outcome (Chițoran & Hualde 2007). When hiatus is avoided, the main repair strategies employed by native speakers are: (1) glide formation (/kopilərie/ - [kopilərije] ‘childhood’); (2) diphthongisation (/realizezi/ [realizezi] ‘you realize’, /de#atunč/ - [deatunč] ‘since then’); (3) vowel elision (V1 elision: /fruktuos/ - [fruktos] ‘fruitful’, /nu#am/ - [nam] ‘I do not have’, V2 elision: /bineɨnțeles/ [binențeles] ‘by no means’, /skrise#ɨn/ - [skrisen] ‘written in’, coalescence of identical vowels: /alkool/ - [alkol] ‘alcohol’, /vara#asta/ - [varasta] ‘this summer’) (Niculescu 2014). In this article, we focus on the second avoidance strategy, both for internal (vowel-vowel sequences within the word) and external hiatus (vowel-vowel sequences across word boundaries). Based on our PhD thesis (Hiatul în limba română. O abordare optimalistă [Hiatus in Romanian. An OT Approach]), this paper will be divided into 3 sections. 2. Analysis. First, we aim to: (1) establish an inventory of internal hiatuses and diphthongs in Romanian based on DOOM2 (Niculescu 2012); (2) classify these sequences according to the position in the word and proximity to stress, vowel height, and frequency in the list. Second, we want to examine how the norm reflects in the spoken language. To accomplish this, we will investigate inter- and intra- speaker variation in the case of V-V sequence diphthongisation through a production task. Data are collected from 10 informants (5 females, 5 males), and the analysis is carried out in PRAAT. In this part of the study, the main objectives are as follows: (1) to identify the structures that undergo diphthongisation; (2) to account for the factors that facilitate this repair strategy; (3) to sort out the sequences that allow for more than one avoidance mechanism (besides the one under investigation) and explain this situation. We hypothesize that external hiatus attracts more repair mechanisms for the same V-V sequence than internal hiatus, and that proximity to stress becomes inoperative for the former type of hiatus. Thus, in the final part of the study, we compare these two classes of vocalic structures in terms of a norm / usage relation (for the internal hiatus, we correlate the data gathered from DOOM2 with the one obtained from the 10 informants), frequency (based on the production experiment, we establish and examine the hierarchies for each type of hiatus), and tendency (we will review those vocalic pairs that are more prone to diphthongise, focusing on their distribution in the two categories of hiatus). This analysis aims to offer an up-to-date description of internal and external hiatus in Romanian at the interface between phonetics and phonology. Keywords: hiatus resolution, internal hiatus, external hiatus, diphthongisation, Romanian phonetics and phonology SELECTED REFERENCES Aguilar, L. 1999. ‘Hiatus and diphthong: Acoustic cues and speech situation differences’, Speech Communication, 28, 57–74. Baltazani, M. 2006. ‘Focusing, Prosodic Phrasing and hiatus resolution in Greek’, Laboratory Phonology, 8, 473–494. Boersma, P. and D. Weenink 2011. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.2.40) [Computer program]. Cabré, T. and P. Prieto 2006. ‘Exceptional Hiatuses in Catalan and Spanish’, in Colina, Fernando Martinez-Gil (eds), Optimality – Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology, vol. 99, Benjamins, 205–238. Casali, R. F. 1996. Resolving Hiatus, UCLA: Doctoral dissertation. Chiţoran, I. 2002a. The Phonology of Romanian: A Constraint – Based Approach, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Chiţoran, I. 2002b. ‘A Perception – Production Study of Romanian Diphthongs and Glide – Vowel Sequences’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32/2, 203–222. Chițoran, I. and J. I. Hualde 2007. ‘From hiatus to diphtong: the evolution of vowel sequences in Romance’, Phonology, 24, 37–75. Davidson, L. and D. Erker 2012. Hiatus resolution in American English: the case against glide insertion, unpublished manuscript, New York. DOOM2 2005. Dicţionarul ortografic, ortoepic şi morfologic al limbii române [The Orthographic, Orthoepic and Morphologic Dictionary of Romanian], Ediţia a II-a revăzută şi adăugită, Bucureşti, Univers Enciclopedic. Garrido, M. 2007. ‘Diphthongization of Mid/Low Vowel Sequences in Columbian Spanish’, Selected Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 30–37. Hualde, J. I. and M. Prieto 2002. ‘On the diphthong/hiatus contrast in Spanish: some experimental results’, Linguistics, 40(2), 217–234. Kabak, B. 2007. ‘Hiatus Resolution in Turkish: An underspecification Account’, Lingua, 117, p. 1378–1411. Kainada, E. 2007. ‘Prosodic Boundary Effects on Duration and Vowel Hiatus in Modern Greek’, ICPhS, XVI, 1225–1228. Marin, Ş. (in preparation). ‘Romanian diphthongs /ea/ and /oa/: An articulatory comparison with /ja/ - /wa/ and with hiatus sequences’, University of Munich. Niculescu, O. 2012. ‘Hiatul ȋn limba română. O perspectivă fonostatistică și acustică’ [Hiatus in Romanian. A phono-statistic and acoustic perspective], in Zafiu et al. (eds), Limba română: direcții actuale în cercetarea lingvistică. Actele celui de al 11-lea Colocviu internațional al Departamentului de Lingvistică, Vol. I. Gramatică, Fonetică și fonologie, Istoria limbii, filologie, București, Editura Universității din București, 286 – 294. Niculescu, O. 2014. ‘Analiza secvențelor vocalice de tip hiat din limba română contemporană. O anchetă lingvistică’, in Rodica Zafiu et al. (eds), Diacronie și sincronie în studiul limbii române. Actele celui de al 13-lea Colocviu internațional al Departamentuui de Lingvistică, Vol. I. Gramatică. Fonetică și fonologie. Istoria limbii române, filologie, București, Editura Universității din București, 229 – 241.