Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Metropolis as a Reflection of the Uncanny

Metropolis and Our Uncanny Reality Both Crary and Burch discuss the varying degrees and progression of different cinematic techniques and their effects on entertainment itself and the viewer. The progression of monocular and one-dimensional film into a more uncanny and three-dimensional experience creates disorientation between the subject and the viewer as experienced in Lang’s 1927 version of the acclaimed film Metropolis .

Abbie​ ​O’Hara Comparative​ ​Literature​ ​232 18​ ​November,​ ​2017 Professor​ ​Calhoon Metropolis​ ​and​ ​Our​ ​Uncanny​ ​Reality Both​ ​Crary​ ​and​ ​Burch​ ​discuss​ ​the​ ​varying​ ​degrees​ ​and​ ​progression​ ​of​ ​different​ ​cinematic techniques​ ​and​ ​their​ ​effects​ ​on​ ​entertainment​ ​itself​ ​and​ ​the​ ​viewer.​ ​The​ ​progression​ ​of​ ​monocular and​ ​one​ ​dimensional​ ​film​ ​into​ ​a​ ​more​ ​uncanny​ ​and​ ​three​ ​dimensional​ ​experience​ ​creates disorientation​ ​between​ ​the​ ​subject​ ​and​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​as​ ​experienced​ ​in​ ​Lang’s​ ​1927​ ​version​ ​of​ ​the acclaimed​ ​film​ ​Metropolis​. Crary’s​ ​essay​ ​recounts​ ​the​ ​historical​ ​connections​ ​and​ ​influences​ ​between​ ​psychology, technology​ ​and​ ​cinema.​ ​It​ ​was​ ​discovered,​ ​through​ ​the​ ​attempted​ ​quantification​ ​of​ ​cognition,​ ​that our​ ​perception​ ​of​ ​visual​ ​stimulus​ ​is​ ​not​ ​instantaneous​ ​and​ ​instead,​ ​highly​ ​impressionable.​ ​Our sensations​ ​blend​ ​and​ ​fuse​ ​in​ ​a​ ​manner​ ​that​ ​ruptures​ ​the​ ​spatial​ ​and​ ​temporal​ ​experience​ ​between viewers​ ​and​ ​objects.​ ​“...temporality​ ​itself​ ​is​ ​made​ ​susceptible​ ​to​ ​a​ ​range​ ​of​ ​external manipulations,”​ ​(107).​ ​ ​This​ ​discovery​ ​broadened​ ​the​ ​field​ ​of​ ​optical​ ​illusions,​ ​inspiring Wheatstone​ ​to​ ​create​ ​the​ ​stereoscope.​ ​This​ ​device​ ​plays​ ​off​ ​our​ ​interpretations​ ​of​ ​depth perception​ ​and​ ​manipulates​ ​the​ ​viewer's​ ​spatial​ ​experience​ ​by​ ​displaying​ ​a​ ​closer​ ​image​ ​in​ ​one eye​ ​and​ ​a​ ​further​ ​image​ ​in​ ​another​ ​eye.​ ​This​ ​creates​ ​the​ ​illusion​ ​of​ ​substance,​ ​or​ s​ pace,​ ​existing in​ ​the​ ​middle​ ​plane.​ ​This​ ​ambiguous​ ​perception​ ​of​ ​the​ ​lack​ ​of​ ​substance​ ​as​ ​inexplicably​ ​palpable is​ ​described​ ​by​ ​Crary​ ​as​ ​uncanny.​ ​The​ ​discovery​ ​of​ ​the​ ​stereoscope​ ​influenced​ ​the​ ​styles​ ​and techniques​ ​of​ ​film​ ​at​ ​the​ ​time,​ ​popularizing​ ​the​ ​‘haptic’​ ​space. Before​ ​the​ ​stereoscope,​ ​films​ ​are​ ​described​ ​by​ ​Burch​ ​as​ ​‘flat’​ ​according​ ​the​ ​our​ ​“western perceptions​ ​of​ ​three​ ​dimensionality,”​ ​(Burch).​ ​This​ ​is​ ​occurs​ ​due​ ​to​ ​a​ ​myriad​ ​of​ ​popular techniques​ ​used​ ​in​ ​early​ ​cinema.​ ​The​ ​first​ ​reason​ ​films​ ​appeared​ ​flat​ ​was​ ​due​ ​to​ ​the​ ​painted backgrounds.​ ​Backgrounds​ ​to​ ​sets​ ​were​ ​inspired​ ​by​ ​Louis​ ​Daguerre’s​ ​elaborate​ ​dioramas​ ​ ​that appeared​ ​three​ ​dimensional,​ ​but​ ​were​ ​ultimately​ ​one​ ​dimensional.​ ​This​ ​can​ ​be​ ​seen​ ​during​ ​the opening​ ​shot​ ​of​ ​Metropolis​ ​when​ ​the​ ​audience​ ​is​ ​oriented​ ​and​ ​given​ ​information​ ​about​ ​the​ ​setting of​ ​the​ ​film​ ​through​ ​mise-en-scene.​ ​Mise-en-scene​ ​is​ ​predominantly​ ​connected​ ​with​ ​realism​ ​and verisimilitude.​ ​The​ ​shot​ ​depicts​ ​a​ ​painted​ ​background​ ​of​ ​the​ ​city​ ​built​ ​by​ ​the​ ​hands​ ​of​ ​the proletariat.​ ​The​ ​city​ ​utilized​ ​painting​ ​techniques​ ​that​ ​convey​ ​three​ ​dimensionality,​ ​but​ ​the​ ​viewer is​ ​fundamentally​ ​aware​ ​of​ ​its​ ​one​ ​dimensionality.​ ​After​ ​the​ ​development​ ​of​ ​the​ ​haptic​ ​space,​ ​sets converted​ ​to​ ​the​ ​used​ ​of​ ​three​ ​dimensional​ ​props​ ​and​ ​sets.​ ​Palpable​ ​objects​ ​in​ ​frame​ ​became​ ​a commonality​ ​within​ ​cinema.​ ​Actors​ ​were​ ​encouraged​ ​to​ ​interact​ ​with​ ​objects,​ ​leave​ ​and​ ​enter​ ​the space​ ​to​ ​prove​ ​to​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​the​ ​space​ ​was​ ​in​ ​fact​ ​three​ ​dimensional.​ ​This​ ​even​ ​began​ ​to influence​ ​the​ ​temporal,​ ​or​ ​montage,​ ​aspects​ ​of​ ​films.​ ​Scenes​ ​would​ ​begin​ ​and​ ​end​ ​with​ ​the entrance​ ​or​ ​exit​ ​of​ ​actors.​ ​This​ ​can​ ​also​ ​be​ ​seen​ ​in​ ​Metropolis​ ​when​ ​the​ ​scene​ ​Jon​ ​is​ ​attempting to​ ​save​ ​Maria​ ​from​ ​the​ ​inventor​ ​and​ ​runs​ ​to​ ​all​ ​the​ ​doors​ ​in​ ​a​ ​nearby​ ​house​ ​to​ ​see​ ​if​ ​they​ ​are unlocked.​ ​He​ ​interacts​ ​with​ ​all​ ​the​ ​doors​ ​that​ ​are​ ​present​ ​and​ ​even​ ​a​ ​trap​ ​door​ ​on​ ​the​ ​floor. Eventually,​ ​after​ ​the​ ​inventor​ ​performs​ ​his​ ​experiment​ ​on​ ​Maria,​ ​on​ ​of​ ​the​ ​doors​ ​automatically opens.​ ​When​ ​Jon​ ​walks​ ​through​ ​the​ ​door,​ ​the​ ​scene​ ​cuts​ ​to​ ​him​ ​at​ ​the​ ​top​ ​of​ ​a​ ​staircase,​ ​entering the​ ​scientist’s​ ​laboratory.​ ​Fusion​ ​of​ ​montage​ ​and​ ​mise-en-scene​ ​in​ ​this​ ​scene​ ​creates​ ​a​ ​more haptic​ ​space. This​ ​development​ ​of​ ​a​ ​haptic​ ​space​ ​in​ ​film​ ​has​ ​been​ ​achieved​ ​through​ ​various​ ​techniques that​ ​leave​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​with​ ​an​ ​uncanny​ ​sentiment​ ​in​ ​response​ ​to​ ​the​ ​verisimilitude​ ​of​ ​components of​ ​montage​ ​and​ ​mise-en-scene.​ ​The​ ​passive​ ​viewer​ ​is​ ​manipulated​ ​through​ ​film​ ​to​ ​experience​ ​an ever​ ​growing​ ​more​ ​uncanny​ ​and​ ​tangible​ ​experience.​ ​“...this​ ​axis​ ​represents​ ​the​ ​metaphysical bond​ ​between​ ​the​ ​observer​ ​and​ ​the​ ​subject,”​ ​(229,​ ​Monaco).​ ​ ​Ideas​ ​of​ ​Foucault​ ​and​ ​utilitarianism urge​ ​us​ ​the​ ​question​ ​whether​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​is​ ​autonomous​ ​during​ ​their​ ​viewing​ ​experience,​ ​or​ ​if, conversely,​ ​they​ ​have​ ​become​ ​a​ ​mechanism​ ​in​ ​the​ ​viewing​ ​process​ ​themselves.​ ​Ideas​ ​of​ ​the mechanization​ ​of​ ​man​ ​and​ ​blurred​ ​lines​ ​of​ ​reality​ ​appear​ ​in​ ​Metropolis.​ ​When​ ​the​ ​inventor creates​ ​another​ ​Maria,​ ​individuals​ ​are​ ​not​ ​able​ ​to​ ​tell​ ​the​ ​difference​ ​between​ ​man​ ​and​ ​machine. Furthermore,​ ​the​ ​workers​ ​toil​ ​in​ ​factories​ ​for​ ​such​ ​long​ ​hours​ ​that​ ​it​ ​has​ ​imprinted​ ​on​ ​them, forming​ ​their​ ​identities​ ​and​ ​experiences​ ​and​ ​this​ ​too​ ​blurs​ ​the​ ​lines​ ​between​ ​man​ ​and machine.”...the​ ​machine​ ​makes​ ​use​ ​of​ ​man​ ​by​ ​subjecting​ ​him​ ​to​ ​a​ ​relation​ ​of​ ​continuity,​ ​of​ ​part to​ ​other​ ​parts,​ ​and​ ​of​ ​exchangeability,”​ ​(131,​ ​Crary).​ ​If​ ​older​ ​film​ ​had​ ​strict​ ​metaphysical boundaries​ ​produced​ ​by​ ​the​ ​perceptual​ ​flatness,​ ​then​ ​haptic​ ​film​ ​has​ ​destroyed​ ​some​ ​of​ ​these boundaries​ ​creating​ ​ ​closer​ ​experience​ ​between​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​and​ ​the​ ​film,​ ​immersing​ ​themselves into​ ​the​ ​film​ ​as​ ​a​ ​component​ ​of​ ​its​ ​existence. Man​ ​is​ ​able​ ​to​ ​more​ ​fully​ ​immerse​ ​himself​ ​in​ ​this​ ​pseudo​ ​real,​ ​artificial​ ​landscape​ ​due​ ​to his​ ​connotative​ ​and​ ​denotative​ ​responses​ ​to​ ​the​ ​trichotomy​ ​of​ ​film.​ ​Codes​ ​presented​ ​in​ ​modern cinema​ ​are​ ​taught​ ​to​ ​society​ ​to​ ​be​ ​associated​ ​with​ ​a​ ​signifier.​ ​This​ ​allows​ ​images​ ​to​ ​convey meaning​ ​beyond​ ​what​ ​is​ ​denoted,​ ​giving​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​a​ ​more​ ​immersive​ ​experience.​ ​Crary describes​ ​pictorial​ ​images​ ​as​ ​a​ ​“...transparent​ ​and​ ​incorporeal​ ​intermediary,”​ ​(136).​ ​This​ ​effect​ ​of uncanniness​ ​is​ ​only​ ​achievable​ ​due​ ​to​ ​the​ ​linkages​ ​between​ ​man’s​ ​ability​ ​to​ ​connote​ ​denoted images​ ​on​ ​the​ ​screen.​ ​During​ ​this​ ​process,​ ​audiences​ ​utilize​ ​an​ ​index,​ ​icons​ ​and​ ​symbols.​ ​For example,​ ​in​ ​Metropolis,​ ​Jon​ ​and​ ​his​ ​peers​ ​are​ ​displayed​ ​gayly​ ​interacting​ ​within​ ​a​ ​garden​ ​like area.​ ​This​ ​may​ ​be​ ​an​ ​allusion​ ​to​ ​the​ ​garden​ ​of​ ​Eden​ ​discussed​ ​in​ ​the​ ​bible.​ ​This​ ​allows​ ​the audience​ ​to​ ​interpret​ ​the​ ​above​ ​ground​ ​world​ ​as​ ​a​ ​utopian​ ​sanctuary,​ ​a​ ​foil​ ​for​ ​the​ ​underground toils​ ​of​ ​the​ ​working​ ​class.​ ​The​ ​dramaturgical​ ​themes​ ​in​ ​the​ ​film​ ​are​ ​reliant​ ​on​ ​the​ ​audience's ability​ ​to​ ​connote​ ​these​ ​basic​ ​ideas​ ​of​ ​class​ ​and​ ​hierarchies. Lang’s​ ​Metropolis​ ​provides​ ​context​ ​when​ ​reading​ ​works​ ​by​ ​Crary​ ​and​ ​Burch​ ​and​ ​their writings​ ​surrounding​ ​our​ ​metaphysical​ ​experiences​ ​in​ ​relation​ ​to​ ​imagery​ ​and​ ​visual​ ​perceptions. Mechanisation​ ​of​ ​the​ ​viewer​ ​is​ ​contextualized​ ​when​ ​we​ ​examine​ ​the​ ​time​ ​period​ ​in​ ​relation​ ​to history.​ ​During​ ​this​ ​era​ ​of​ ​filmmaking,​ ​the​ ​bourgeoisie​ ​had​ ​obtained​ ​a​ ​new,​ ​more​ ​influential social​ ​standing​ ​through​ ​the​ ​development​ ​of​ ​technology​ ​and​ ​its​ ​influence​ ​within​ ​the​ ​economy. This​ ​creates​ ​an​ ​environment​ ​where​ ​the​ ​proletariat,​ ​as​ ​an​ ​oppressed​ ​entity,​ ​is​ ​ideologically morphed​ ​with​ ​machinery;​ ​a​ ​representation​ ​of​ ​a​ ​new​ ​industrial​ ​society.​ ​The​ ​dependant relationship​ ​between​ ​the​ ​bourgeois​ ​and​ ​the​ ​proletariat​ ​creates​ ​a​ ​sentiment​ ​of​ ​anxiety​ ​among​ ​the upper​ ​class,​ ​resulting​ ​in​ ​its​ ​convert​ ​expression​ ​within​ ​cinema​ ​such​ ​as​ ​Metropolis​.​ ​This​ ​also engendered​ ​a​ ​prodigious​ ​confusion​ ​between​ ​the​ ​perception​ ​of​ ​our​ ​reality​ ​as​ ​real​ ​or​ ​conceptual.​ ​A manifestation​ ​of​ ​this​ ​confusion​ ​is​ ​present​ ​within​ ​the​ ​invention​ ​of​ ​optical​ ​illusions,​ ​creating​ ​a synthetic​ ​haptic​ ​space​ ​that​ ​is​ ​perceived​ ​as​ ​having​ ​uncanny​ ​verisimilitude​ ​to​ ​our​ ​palpable​ ​reality.