International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)
Volume VI, Issue VII, July 2017 | ISSN 2278-2540
Review on Different Sources for the Production of
Biodiesel
Pravinkumar D Patil 1, Masoomraja Z Mulla2
1
Chemical Technology Division, Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, 416004, India
Energy Technology Division, Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, 416004, India
2
Abstract— Biodiesel is generally produced from various seed oils
such as soybeans, rapeseed and corn. Such a diesel can be used in
cars, trucks, busses, construction equipment, in jet engines and
in heating and electricity generating systems, but only through
blends with maximum blend up to 25% (v/v) Biofuels burn
cleaner than fossil fuels. They don't produce sulphur or
aromatics. Main benefit of using biodiesel is that, it reduces
nitrogen oxide emissions compared to fossil fuel. This article
reviews different sources for the production of biodiesel.
Biodiesel is environmentally safer than petro-diesel. It is nontoxic, produces less skin irritation, it degrades four times as fast
as petro-diesel, has a flash point significantly higher than that of
petro diesel, thus making it safer to store and handle.
Biodiesel can be described as ‗carbon neutral‘ as this
fuel does not produce carbon dioxide (CO2). Biodiesel
degrades rapidly in the environment and is non-toxic,
moreover storing biodiesel is also very safe. Greenhouse gas
emissions that are produced by fossil fuels are the prime
reasons behind choosing biodiesel as an alternative fuel for
those fossil fuels. The biodiesel has plenty of advantages over
fossil fuels. It can be used as an excellent alternative fuel for
the diesel engine, mainly low carbon content makes it as an
alternative to heating oil. With the help of biodiesel we can
cycle carbon into the atmosphere instead of releasing stored
carbon.
Keywords— biodiesel; edible sources; non-edible sources; waste
cooking oil; transesterification; review;
Properties of Biodiesel
Properties
Value
I. INTRODUCTION
Specific gravity
0.87 to 0.89
iodiesel is used as substitute fuel for diesel engines
because it has environmental benefits. Producing
biodiesel from waste cooking oil is most easy way and has
many environmental benefits. The use of cooking oils
produces significant amount of used oils which cause a severe
disposal problem. Biodiesel production from waste cooking
oil has many advantages because of their low price,
availability and less fatty acid content. Used cooking oil is
described as a 'renewable fuel' as it does not add any extra
carbon dioxide gas to the atmosphere, as opposed to fossil
fuels, which cause changes in the atmosphere. Cooking oil
from plant sources is the best source to produce biodiesel
because the conversion of pure triglyceride to fatty acid
methyl ester is high and the reaction time is short. Biodiesel is
commonly produced by transesterification process where
waste cooking oil reacts with alcohol and catalyst mixture to
produce fatty acid methyl esters and glycerol as a by-product.
Kinematic viscosity at 40°C
(mm2/s)
3.7 to 5.8
B
The cooking oil was first used by Rudolph Diesel for
the purpose. He developed the first diesel engine working on
peanut oil at the World‘s Exhibition in Paris, 1900 [1]. Until
1920s cooking oils was being used as the energy source in
diesel engines. The factors like profitability, availability, low
sulphur content, low aromatic content, biodegradability and
renewability makes WCO based biodiesel more favourable
over diesel fuel [2].
www.ijltemas.in
Cetane number
46 to 70
Flash point, °C
120-130
Iodine number
Sulphur wt. %
Reference: [3, 4, 5]
60-135
0.00 – 0.0024
II. PROBLEM DEFINITION
Fossils fuels are the major source of energy for
today‘s vehicles. If tomorrow the fuel wells get exhausted, the
total economy of ―Rapid Developing World‖ will collapse,
thus the need of the substitution is obligatory for the modern
world. One of the most promising substitutes for the
conventional diesel is biodiesel. It is most valuable form of
renewable energy that can be used directly in any existing,
unmodified diesel engine. Biodiesel burns more cleanly than
gasoline and diesel. Using biodiesel means producing fewer
emissions of carbon monoxide, particulates and toxic
chemicals that cause smog, aggravate respiratory and heart
diseases and contribute to thousands of premature deaths
each year.
III. LITERATURE REVIEW
In recent years, biodiesel has been produced from
edible and nonedible sources, animal fats, soap stock,
Page 21
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)
Volume VI, Issue VII, July 2017 | ISSN 2278-2540
recycled frying oils and also from macro and micro algae. In
order to know which sources (Edible or non-edible sources)
are the suitable for the production of biodiesel, the factors that
need to be considered include geography, climatic conditions
and economics. From the edible sources, cooking oils are
considered as the renewable forms of fuel as they are made
from renewable resources and therefore they are more
attractive giving more environmental benefits. Cooking oil
potentially forms the unlimited source of energy; with an
energy content equivalent to that of diesel fuel. Direct use of
cooking oil in diesel engines gives rise to many problems such
as jamming and gumming of filters, lines and injectors; engine
knocking; starting problem during cold weather; coking of
injectors on piston and head of engine; extreme engine wear;
carbon deposition on piston and head of engine [6].
Cooking oils are of high viscosity and in order to
reduce their viscosity and to overcome their problems to
enable their use in many diesel engines, a process called transesterification must be carried out. The product so formed after
trans-esterification is called the biodiesel. Mostly there are
higher heating values of biodiesel. When biodiesel is 100%
pure then it is been referred as ―neat fuel‖ or ―B100‖.
Biodiesel with high heating values (HHV‘s) ranges from 39 to
41MJ/Kg. Biodiesel can be effectively used by blending with
petra-diesel and those blends are referred as BXX where XX
represents the amount of biodiesel in the blend whereas the
pure biodiesel may be denoted as B100 [7].
IV. EDIBLE SOURCES
Biodiesel may be produced from many lipids such as
cooking oil feedstock, waste cooking oil, soybean oil and nonedible oils such as jatropha oil, neem oil, castor oil, soap-nut
oil etc. [8].
Apart from edible and non-edible sources, algae are
contemplated as an important source for the production of
biodiesel. The yield from algal oil is above 200 times the yield
from that of cooking oils of biodiesel [9].
Vegetables sources such as cotton seed oil, soybean
oil, sunflower oil, palm oil and animal sources and rapeseed
oil are also being used. Few other sources for the production
of biodiesel are tobacco seed, sorghum, jatropha, pongamia,
micra as well as microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris), oat, piqui
(Caryocar sp.), Cynara cardunculus, fish oil, groundnut
almond, andiroba (Carapa guianensis), babassu (Orbignia sp.),
barley, and wheat [10].
For the production of biodiesel, mainly used edible
oils are Coconut (copra), corn (maize), cottonseed, canola (a
variety of rapeseed), olive, peanut (groundnut), safflower,
sesame, soybean, sunflower seed oils, nut oils, almond,
cashew, hazelnut, macadamia, pecan, pistachio and walnut.
Whereas amaranth, apricot, argan, artichoke, avocado,
babassu, bay laurel, beech nut, ben, borneo tallow nut, carob
www.ijltemas.in
pod (algaroba), cohune, coriander seed, false flax, grape seed,
hemp, kapok seed, lallemantia, lemon seed, macauba fruit
(Acrocomia sclerocarpa), meadowfoam seed, mustard, okra
seed (hibiscus seed), perilla seed, pequi, (Caryocar brasiliensis
seed), pine nut, poppy seed, prune kernel, quinoa, ramtil
(Guizotia abyssinica seed or Niger pea), rice bran, tallow, tea
(camellia), thistle (Silybum marianum seed) and wheat are
other sources to obtain edible oils [11].
A. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil
Waste cooking oils are the most attractive. interesting and
common source for the production of biodiesel due to their
low cost. From large food processing units and service
facilities, waste cooking oil may be collected in huge
proportion. All such units include several chemical reactions
such as hydrolysis, polymerization and oxidation during food
frying process, which result in increasing efficiency of fatty
acids [12].
Only edible oils are used for cooking purposes, after which
the oil is usually thrown away in the nature. The amount of
heat and water increases the hydrolysis of triglycerides and
the percent of free fatty acid (FFA) in the oil [13]. If water
and FFA content are in higher proportion, direct transesterification reaction is unable to conduct [13, 14] and in
order to reduce FFA, esterification process has to needs to be
carried out. The WCO (waste cooking oil) price is two to
three times cheaper than cooking oils and it also reduces the
cost of waste product removal and treatment [15]. The WCO
has been categorized by the FFA content into two groups: (a)
yellow grease (<15%) and (b) brown grease (>15%) [16].
Some negative effects of WCO utilization for
biodiesel production include separation of fatty acid esters and
glycerol and formation of di-meric and polymeric acids and
glycerides. Consequently the viscosity of cooking oil
increases, while the saponification process decreases the
molecular mass and iodine values [17, 18, 19]. Meanwhile,
soap formation partially consumes the catalyst and reduces the
final yield. There is no appropriate method for collecting
waste cooking oils from households yet. The amount of WCO
dumped through drains leads to water pollution. More than
80% of WCO is produced in households and controlling its
disposal involves huge investments such as waste oil disposal
and high water treatment cost [20, 21]. Therefore, using WCO
for producing biodiesel is an important act of from
environment care stand point.
There are various methods for biodiesel production
from waste cooking oil which can be divided into three main
groups: Homogeneous, Heterogonous and Non-catalytic transesterification.
B. Biodiesel Production from Soap stock
Soap stock is generally the by-product of refined cooking
oils. It is an additional low value feedstock for biodiesel
Page 22
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)
Volume VI, Issue VII, July 2017 | ISSN 2278-2540
production which contains an extensive amount of water of
about 44.2%. These contain less free fatty acids because of
alkaline nature of aqueous emulsion of lipids. However these
have the fatty constituents such as soaps, mono, di, triglycerides and phosphatides which can be easily converted
into fatty acid methyl esters [22].
V. NON EDIBLE SOURCES
Biodiesel production from edible sources such as cooking
oil and animal fats has become more expensive as they
compete with food materials. In recent years the cooking oils
being from edible sources, their demand has been higher and
hence they are not preferred much for biodiesel production.
Some of the sources like Pongamia glabra, Lesquerella
fendleri, Madhuca indica, Chlorella vulgaris, oat, rice, rubber
seed, sesame, tobacco seed, Dipteryx odorata, Cynara
cardunculus, fish oil, groundnut, wheat, almond, Carapa
guianensis, barley, Camelina sativa, coconut, copra, jatropha,
soapnut, algae, babassu tree, copaiba, honge, jatropha or
ratanjyote, jojoba, karanja or honge, mahua, milk bush,
nagchampa, neem, petroleum nut, rubber seed tree, silk cotton
tree and tallare are used as non-edible plant oil sources for
biodiesel production [23,24].
A. Biodiesel Production from Jatropha Oil
Jatropha curcas L. is a plant belongs to Euphorbiaceae
family, where its seeds produces huge amount of oil. Jatropha
curcas L. plant has been widespread in arid, semi-arid and
tropical regions of the world, Jatropha is a drought resistant
perennial tree that grows in marginal lands and can live over
50 years [25]. As per the weight of the seed, the oil content in
jatropha seed ranges from 30 to 50% and ranges from 45 to
60% weight of the kernel itself [26]. Jatropha curcas L. has
favourable properties for the production of biodiesel because
of its calorific value and cetane number [27].
Many studies have revealed that plant sources have
immense potential for the production of biodiesel. Azam et al.
[28] studied the prospects of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME)
of some 26 non-traditional plant seed oils including jatropha
to use as potential biodiesel in India. Among them,
Azadirachta indica, Calophyllum inophyllum, J. curcas and
Pongamia pinnata were found most suitable for use as
biodiesel and they meet the major specification of biodiesel
for use in diesel engine. Moreover, they reported that 75 oil
bearing plants contain 30% or more oil in their seed, fruit or
nut. Subramanian et al. [29] reported that there are over 300
different species of trees which produce oil bearing seeds.
Thus, there is a significant potential for non-edible oil source
from different plants for biodiesel production as an alternative
to petro diesel.
According to the reports, Jatropha curcas L. is found as
the best source for the production of biodiesel. A study made
by Azam et al., says that Biodiesel made from Jatropha and
www.ijltemas.in
biodiesel from palm oil when blended at about 20-40% will
improve oxidation stability and low temperature property
[30]. Biodiesel from jatropha and biodiesel from palm has
good low temperature oxidative stability respectively and also
it was initiated that antioxidant dosage could be reduced by
80-90%. According to Sarin et al. jatropha seed can produce
huge amount of oil for biodiesel production [31]. This is the
significant source of from non-edible oils32].
B. Biodiesel Production from Soap nut oil
Soapnut plant grows well in deep loamy soils and leached
soils, so nurturing of soapnut in such soil evades probable soil
erosion. As well as it helps to produce more seeds and this
acts as a feedstock for biodiesel production [33].
Soapnut is a fruit of the soapnut tree found in tropical and
sub-tropical areas in various parts of the world. Soapnut oil is
also another favourable non-edible sources for the production
of biodiesel [34].
Chhetri et al. [35] covered all important points and studied
deeply on the uses of various parts of the soapnut tree.
Soapnut has many applications from the field of medicinal
treatments to soap and surfactant. Soapnut fruit shells have
been in use as natural laundry detergents from ancient times
for washing fabrics, bathing and traditional medicines.
Mandava [36] reported that saponins from Soapnut shells can
be used for treatment of soil contaminants. Many studies also
reported that soapnut is a natural surfactant which can be used
for washing soil contaminants with organic compounds [37;
38]. According to a study, the external use of saponin does
not have any toxic effects on human skin and eyes [39]. The
seeds of soapnut are totally a waste because all these
application make use of the pericarp shell only. Therefore, the
waste soapnut seeds become a favourable source for the
production of biodiesel. Furthermore, planting soapnut trees
in community forestry and in barren lands provides sink for
carbon sequestration as well as feedstock for biodiesel
production.
C. Microorganisms as a source for biodiesel production
Lipomyces starkeyi, Rhodotorula glutinis, Yarrowia
Cryptococcus curvatus, Lipomyces lipofera, lipolytica,
Rhodococcus, and Nocardia are capable of producing
intracellular triacylglycerides [40].
These microorganisms contain fats up to 80% of the
cellular dry weight [41]. Microorganisms comprise of a broad
string of substrates like carbon source, sugars, organic acids,
alcohols, oils and different waste products such as whey and
agro-industrial waste for triacylglyceride synthesis [22].
D. Grease as a source for biodiesel production
Greases are regarded as cheap feedstocks for biodiesel
production. They include triglycerides (TG), di-glycerides
(DG), monoglycerides (MG), and free fatty acids (FFA) of
Page 23
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)
Volume VI, Issue VII, July 2017 | ISSN 2278-2540
about 8 to 40%. A grease with 8-12 wt. % FFA is sorted as
yellow grease, and a grease containing >35 wt. % FFA is
sorted as a brown grease [42].
E. Microalgae as a source for biodiesel production
Microalgae, the small microorganisms, can grow in fresh,
marine, waste and saline water. Microalgae have the potential
to produce 136,900 litres while jatropha can produce 1,892
litres oil per acre. Microalgae can fix large amount of carbon
dioxide (CO2) and contribute about 40-50% oxygen in the
atmosphere, thereby, supporting biological life on our planet
by producing food, medicines, chemicals etc. for human
consumption [43].
Use of microalgae for biodiesel production has numerous
advantages in contrast with other accessible feedstocks [44].
Microalgae also offer feedstock for quite a few types of
renewable fuels such as biodiesel, methane, hydrogen, ethanol
etc. Microalgae biodiesel acts well as petroleum diesel, at the
same time it decreases the productions of particulate matter
such as CO, hydrocarbons, and SOx. [45].
Microalgae can be grown vigorously everywhere and
throughout the year, some species of it can be reaped daily, it
is suitable for cold environment due to presence of
polyunsaturates and so it is mostly preferred as the best source
for the production of biodiesel [46].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
VI. CONCLUSION
[14].
Fossils fuels are non-renewable forms of energy
resources and they are depleting day by day and will get
depleted soon. So the demand for biofuels such as biodiesel is
increasing rapidly. Biofuels like biodiesel are renewable, ecofriendly and non-toxic energy resources. Most studies reveal
that biodiesel properties are mostly similar to petroleum diesel
properties but biodiesel emits negligible amount of CO2,
sulphur and particulates as compared to petroleum diesel. In
summary, WCO, grease, and soap stock are potential
feedstock for biodiesel production, which can lower the cost
of biodiesel since they are inexpensive, whereas from nonedible sources like microalgae and soapnut are also the most
favourable sources for biodiesel production. But from
different studies, we arrive at a strong conclusion that
microalgae are the best source for biodiesel production
because microalgae have many advantages over other
conventional sources. A rigorous research movement may be
strengthened for the production of biodiesel from various
possible sources to produce the same as an important bio-fuel.
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].
REFERENCES
[1]. Nitschke, W.R., Wilson, C.M., ―Rudolph Diesel, Pioneer of the
Age of Power‖, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK,
1965.
[2]. Marek, Adamczak1, Uwe T., Bornscheuer2 and Włodzimierz
Bednarski1, ―The application of biotechnological methods for the
www.ijltemas.in
[23].
synthesis of biodiesel‖, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. vol. 111, 2009,
pp.808–813.
Balat, M., ―Current alternative engine fuels‖, Energy Sources,
vol.27, 2005, pp.569–77.
Demirbas, A., ―Current advances in alternative motor fuels‖,
Energy Explor Exploit, vol.21, 2003, pp.475–87.
Nezahat, boz., miray, kara., oylum, sunal., ertan, alptekin.,
nebahat, degirmenbasi., ―Investigation of the fuel properties of
biodiesel produced over an alumina-based solid catalyst‖, Turk J
Chem, vol.33, 2009, pp.433 – 442.
Suppes, G.J., Bockwinkel, K., Lucas, S., Botts, J.B., Mason, M.H.,
Heppert, J.A., ―Calcium carbonate catalyzed alcoholysis of fats
and oils‖, J Am Oil Chem Soc, vol.78 (2), 2001, pp.139–145.
Sandeep Kumar., Dr. Amit Pal, ―A Review of Bio-Diesel as an
Alternative Fuel for Vehicles‖, Volume 2 Issue 7, 2014.
Meng, X., Yang, J., Xu, X. L., Zhang. Nie, Q., Xian, M.,
―Biodiesel production from oleaginous microorganisms‖, Renew
Energy, vol.34, 2009, pp. 1–5.
Sheehan, J., Dunahay, T., Benemann, J., Roessler, P., ―Energy‘s
Aquatic Species Program—Biodiesel from Algae‖, National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Golden, CO, 1998.
Leman, J., ―Oleaginous microorganisms: An assessment of the
potential‖, Adv Appl Microbiology, vol. 43, 1997, pp. 195–243.
Monisha J, Harish A, Sushma R, Krishna Murthy T P*, Blessy B
Mathew, Ananda S., ―Biodiesel: A Review‖, Vol. 3, 2013, pp.902912.
Canakci, M., Gerpen, J.V., ―Biodiesel production from oils and
fats with high free fatty acids‖, Transact. ASAE, vol.44 (6), 2001,
pp. 1429-1436. And Ji-Yeon Park., Deog-Keun Kim., ZhongMing Wang., Joon-Pyo Lee., Soon-Chul Park., Jin-Suk Lee.,
―Production of biodiesel from soapstock using an ion-exchange
resin catalyst‖, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 25,
2008, pp.1350-1354.
Canakci MÖ, zsezen AN. Evaluating waste cooking oil as
alternative diesel fuel. GU J Sci 2005; 18(1):81–91.
Jacobson K, Gopinath R, Meher LC, Dalai AK. Solid acid
catalyzed biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Appl Catal
B: Environ 2008; 85:86–91.
Phan AN, Phan TM. Biodiesel production from waste cooking
oils. Fuel 2008; 87:3490–6.
Goering CE, Schwab AW, Daugherty MJ, Pryde EH, Heakin AJ.
Fuel properties of Elven vegetable oils. Trans ASAE 1982;
85:1472–83.
Marmesat S, Macado RE, Velasco J, Dorbangarnes MC. Used
frying fats and oils. Comparison of rapid tests based on chemical
and physical oil properties. Int J Food Sci Technol 2007; 42:601–
8.
Tomasevic AV, Siler-Marinkovic SS. Methanolysis of used frying
oil. Fuel Process Technol 2003; 81:1–6.
Ruiz-Mendes MV, Marmesat S, Liotta A, Dobarganes MC.
Analysis of used frying fats for the production of biodiesel. Grasas
Aceites 2008; 59(1):45–50.
Alcantara R, Amores J, Canoira L, Fidalgo E, Franco MJ, Navarro
A. Catalytic production of biodiesel from soybean oil. Used frying
oil and tallow. Biomass Bioenergy 2000; 18:515–27.
Lam MK, Lee KT. Renewable and sustainable bioenergies
production from palm oil mill effluent (POME): win-win
strategies toward better environmental protection. Biotechnol Adv
2011; 29:124–41.
Ji-Yeon Park., Deog-Keun Kim., Zhong-Ming Wang., Joon-Pyo
Lee., Soon-Chul Park., Jin-Suk Lee., ―Production of biodiesel
from soapstock using an ion-exchange resin catalyst‖, Korean
Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 25, 2008, pp.1350-1354.
Pinto, A.C., Guarieiro, L.L.N., Rezende, M.J.C., Ribeiro, N.M.,
Torres, E.A., Lopes, W.A., Pereira, P. A.P., Andrade, J.B.,
―Biodiesel: an overview‖, J Brazil Chem Soc, Vol. 16, 2005, pp.
1313−1330.
Page 24
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)
Volume VI, Issue VII, July 2017 | ISSN 2278-2540
[24]. Pant, K.S., Kumar, D., Gairola, S., ―Seed oil content variation in
jatropha curcas L. in different altitudinal ranges and site
conditions in H.P India‖, Lyonia,vol11, 2006, pp. 31-34.
[25]. Bosswell MJ. Plant Oils: Wealth, health, energy and environment.
Proc. International conference of Renewable Energy Technology
for rural Development; Kathmandu, Nepal. Oct 12–14, 2003.
[26]. Pramanik K. Properties and use of jatropha curcas oil and diesel
fuel blends in compression ignition engine. Renewable Energy.
2003; 28:239–248.
[27]. Azam, M.M., Waris, A., Nahar, N.M., ―Prospects and potential of
fatty acid methyl esters of some non-traditional seed oils for use as
biodiesel in India‖, Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 29, 2005, pp. 293302.
[28]. Azam MM, Waris A, Nahar NM. Prospects and potential of fatty
acid methyl esters of some non-traditional seed oils for use as
biodiesel in India. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2005; 29:293–302.
[29]. Subramanian AK, Singal SK, Saxena M, Singhal S. Utilization of
liquid biofuels in automotive diesel engines: An Indian
perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2005; 9:65–72.
[30]. Sirisomboon, P., Kitchaiya, P., Pholpho, T., Mahuttanyavanitch,
W., ―Physical and mechanical properties of Jatropha curcas L.
fruits, nuts and kernels‖, Biosyst, Eng, vol.97, 2007, pp. 201-207.
[31]. Sarin, R., Sharma, M., Sinharay, S., Malhotra, R.K., ―Jatrophapalm biodiesel blends: An optimum mix for Asia‖, Fuel, vol.86,
2007, pp. 1365- 1371.
[32]. Ucciani, E., Mallet, J.F., Zahra, J.P., ―Cyanolipids and fatty acids
of Sapindus trifoliatus L. (Sapindaceae) Seed Oil‖. Fat Science
Technology, vol.96, 1994, pp. 69 – 71.
[33]. Chhetri, A.B., Pokharel, Y.R., Mann, H and Islam, M.R.,
―Characterization of soapnut and its use as natural additives. Int‖,
Journal of Material and Products Technology, 2007a, July.
[34]. Mandava, S.S., ―Application of a natural surfactant from sapindus
emerginatus to in-situ flushing of soils contaminated with
hydrophobic organic compounds‖, M.S. Thesis in Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Louisiana State University
and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1994.
[35]. Chhetri AB, Pokharel YR, Mann H, Islam MR. Characterization
of soapnut and its use as natural additives. Int Journal of Material
and Products Technology. 2007a accepted, July.
www.ijltemas.in
[36]. Mandava SS. Application of a natural surfactant from sapindus
emerginatus to in-situ flushing of soils contaminated with
hydrophobic organic compounds. 1994. M.S. Thesis in Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Louisiana State University
and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
[37]. Roy D, Kommalapati RR, Mandava S, Valsaraj KT, Constant
WD. Soil washing potential of a natural surfactant. Environ Sci
Technol. 1997; 31(3):670–675.
[38]. Kommalapati RR, Valsaraj KT, Constant WD, Roy D. Soil
flushing using colloidal gas aphron suspensions generated from a
plant-based surfactant. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 1998;
60:73–87.
[39]. Windholz M. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals,
Drugs, and Biologicals. Merck; Rathway, NJ: 1983.
[40]. Li, Q., Du, W., Liu, D., ―Perspectives of microbial oils for
biodiesel production‖, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. vol.80, 2008,
pp. 749–756.
[41]. Demirbas, A., ―New liquid biofuels from vegetable oils via
catalytic pyrolysis‖, Energy Educ Sci Technol. vol.21, 2008, pp.
1–59.
[42]. Canakci, M., Gerpen, J.V., ―A pilot plant to produce biodiesel
from high free fatty acid feedstocks‖, Trans. ASAE, vol.46 (4),
2003, pp. 945-954.
[43]. M. Kumar, M.P. Sharma and G. Dwivedi. Algae Oil as Future
Energy Source in Indian Perspective. International Journal of
Renewable Energy Research, 2013, 3, 913-921.
[44]. Li, Y., Wang, B., Wu, N., Lan, C.Q., ―Effects of nitrogen sources
on cell growth and lipid production of Neochloris oleoabundans‖,
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol.81 (4), 2008, pp.
629–36.
[45]. Hossain, A.B.M.S., Salleh, A., Boyce, A.N., Chowdhury, P.,
Naqiuddin, M., ―Biodiesel fuel production from algae as
renewable energy‖, American Journal of Biochemistry and
Biotechnology, vol.4 (3), 2008, pp. 250–4.
[46]. Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Jarvis, E., Ghirardi, M., Posewitz, M.,
Seibert, M., et al. ―Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for
biofuels production‖, The Plant Journal, vol.54, 2008, pp. 621–39.
Page 25