Vol. 66, No. 8
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Aug. 1992, p. 4629-4631
0022-538X/92/084629-03$02.00/0
Copyright © 1992, American Society for Microbiology
MINIREVIEW
One Hundred Years of Virology
ALICE LUSTIG AND ARNOLD J. LEVINE*
Department of Molecular Biology, Lewis Thomas Laboratory,
Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-1014
Petersburg University. He stayed on at the University to
for a career in academic teaching and to work in the
botanical laboratory. Later he accepted an assistantship at
the Academy of Sciences in the laboratory of Andrei Famintsyn, one of the first Russian botanists to specialize in plant
physiology. Ivanovsky was awarded a master's degree in
1895 for his dissertation "An Investigation into the Fermentation of Alcohol," and a doctorate was awarded in 1903 for
his work on the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV).
While still a student at the University of St. Petersburg,
Ivanovsky was commissioned in 1887 and again in 1890 by
the Russian Department of Agriculture to investigate the
causes of a disease which had struck the tobacco plantations
in Bessarabia, Ukraine, and the Crimea. Ivanovsky began
his studies on the tobacco diseases, building on the previous
work of Adolf Mayer, a German chemist who was the first
scientist to do microbiological research on tobacco mosaic
disease. Mayer had begun his research on diseases of
tobacco in Holland in 1879. Although Mayer did not discover
tobacco mosaic disease, he was the first to give it a permanent name (after the mosaic of dark and light spots on
infected leaves) and is generally credited with proving the
infectious nature of the disease. Mayer's experiment of
inoculating healthy plants with the juice extracted by grinding up leaves from diseased plants was the first experimental
transmission of a viral disease in plants. Without knowing
the causal agent, which he was unable to see or culture, he
I suddenly made the discovery that the juice
reported ".
from diseased plants obtained by grinding was a certain
infectious substance for healthy plants .. in nine cases out
of ten (of inoculated plants) one will be successful in making
the healthy plant
heavily diseased" (14). These studies
established the infectious nature of this disease, but neither
bacterial nor fungal agents could be cultured or detected and
so Koch's postulates could not be employed. Mayer preferred to conclude that the disease could be caused by
bacteria whose nature prevented their isolation and this
would be revealed in future studies.
After his return from the Crimea where he studied the
tobacco mosaic disease, Ivanovsky came to an interesting
conclusion about the etiologic agent of this disease. In a
paper read on 12 February 1892 before the Academy of
Sciences in St. Petersburg, Ivanovsky reported that the
tobacco mosaic disease was caused by a filterable infectious
agent (10). He passed infected sap through what was then
considered to be a bacteria-proof Chamberland filter made
from unglazed porcelain. The Chamberland filter, perfected
in 1884 by Charles Chamberland, one of Pasteur's collaborators, had become a common instrument of bacteriological
research, because it was assumed that the pores of the filter
were small enough to hold back the majority of bacteria.
After inoculating the filtrate into healthy plants, Ivanovsky
One hundred years ago a young Russian scientist, Dimitri
Ivanovsky (1864 to 1920), presented a paper before the
Academy of Sciences of St. Petersburg in which he stated
that "the sap of leaves infected with tobacco mosaic disease
retains its infectious properties even after filtration through
Chamberland filter candles" (10). This observation suggested a disease agent smaller than any known before and
was the first step in a long series of observations and
experiments that led to the discovery of viruses.
While it is often difficult to assign a single date to the
discovery of viruses, Ivanovsky is generally given credit for
first recognizing an entity that is filterable and submicroscopic in size that might well be the cause of a disease.
Indeed, the term filterable agent was the name used to
describe these organisms well before the term viruses was
specifically applied to them. Filtration became an experimental definition. Ivanovsky's contributions and priority for
the discovery were "willingly acknowledged" by Martinus
Beijerinck who, unaware of Ivanovsky's work, published
similar findings 6 years later in 1898 (3). Fifty years later, in
1944, Wendell Stanley writing in Science stated that "there
is considerable justification for regarding Ivanovsky as the
father of the new science of Virology" (17).
The nineteenth century saw the final defeat of the concept
favoring spontaneous generation of organisms and an acceptance of the germ theory of disease. The new definition of
causality for a disease inherent in Robert Koch's postulates
and the proof that anthrax in cattle was caused by Bacillus
anthraxus had a powerful impact on the scientists working in
the last decades of the nineteenth century. Although some,
like the great anatomist Jacob Henle (a teacher of Robert
Koch and grandfather of Werner Henle), had the imagination
to conceive of infectious agents with the properties of
viruses as early as 1840, these ideas failed to gain acceptance
for a lack of experimental evidence. The path to that
evidence begins with three scientists independently working
on the tobacco mosaic disease, Adolf Mayer, Dimitri
Ivanovsky, and Martinus Beijerinck (Fig. 1).
Dimitri Ivanovsky, son of a landowner in Kherson Guberniya, was born in the village of Nix near St. Petersburg on
28 October 1864. After the death of his father when
Ivanovsky and his siblings were still young, the family
moved to a poor section of St. Petersburg. There Ivanovsky
attended secondary school and served as a tutor to supplement his mother's pension. Ivanovsky was educated at the
gymnasium of Gdov and at St. Petersburg, graduating as a
gold medalist in the spring of 1883. After defending his thesis
"On Two Diseases of Tobacco Plants," Ivanovsky was
awarded the degree of candidate of science in 1888 by St.
*
prepare
.
.
.
.
Corresponding author.
4629
.
.
4630
J. VIROL.
MINIREVIEW
MARTINUS WILLEM BEIlERINCK
DMITRII IVANOVSKY
ADOLF MAYER
FIG. 1. Pioneers in virus research.
observed that the filtrate remained unchanged and reproduced the disease. He concluded that the filtrate might
contain an infectious agent. It was this filtration experiment
that was the first step in the discovery of viruses. Ivanovsky,
like Mayer before him, tried to interpret his observations in
the light of the germ theory of disease and Koch's postulates, even suggesting that his unusual results might be due
to a defect in the filter candle or to his experimental method.
It is not surprising that Ivanovsky failed to understand the
full significance of his filtration experiments, for his results
were directly contrary to all accepted scientific knowledge.
He even believed for a period of time that his experiment
should be interpreted as detecting a bacterial toxin which, as
a soluble substance, would pass through the Chamberland
filter. However, after learning of the work of Martinus
Beijerinck who demonstrated that the filterable agent could
reproduce itself, Ivanovsky accepted the idea of a filterable
infectious agent.
The last and most detailed study on tobacco mosaic
disease undertaken by Ivanovsky was published in 1903 (11).
In this work Ivanovsky described abnormal intracellular
inclusion bodies in the host cells of virus-diseased plants,
and his descriptions of crystallike bodies are now clearly
believed to be of the virus itself. Although he did not
recognize his inclusion bodies as the virus, Ivanovsky did
argue for the existence of a connection between the crystals
and the pathogenic source and presented evidence that this
pathogenic agent could replicate only in living organisms.
Independently of Ivanovsky, Martinus Beijerinck, the
third major scientist studying tobacco mosaic disease in the
last decade of the nineteenth century, found in 1898 that this
causal agent was indeed filterable. He extended the studies
and experiments on tobacco mosaic disease beyond anything
Ivanovsky had accomplished and determined that the infectious agent was able to multiply within living plants, hypothesized that it was liquid and soluble, and described it as a
"contagium vivum fluidum" (contagious living fluid) (14).
This concept began a 25-year debate about the nature of
viruses, liquids or particulate? A debate which was laid to
rest with d'Herelle's plaque assay in 1917 (6) and the first
electron micrographs of TMV in 1939 (12).
Beijerinck, like Ivanovsky, was influenced by Mayer and
was a collaborator of his at the Agricultural School of
Wageningen. Beijerinck examined the infectious filtrates
under the light microscope and tried to detect the causal
bacteria. Like Mayer and Ivanovsky before him, he at first
attributed his inability to detect or to culture the agent to the
state of current microbiological techniques and not to properties of the agent itself. Although he was not aware of
Ivanovsky's previous discoveries, Beijerinck reported that
"sap from infected plants, after having traversed a porcelain
filter, remains virulent" (3). He found that the mosaic
disease had the ability to multiply (with dilution, it returned
to its original strength) within living plants, suggesting to him
that the pathogen was not a chemical substance but replicated through serial passages. He also observed that there
was no sign of replication outside the plant and that only
growing parts of the tobacco plant became infected; the
pathogen multiplied only in tissues undergoing cell division.
Thus, TMV played a key role in the origins of virology. In
a small series of steps from Mayer to Ivanovsky to Beijerinck, the concept of a filterable agent, too small to observe
in the light microscope but able to cause disease by multiplying in living cells and tissue, was born. Loeffler and
Frosch rapidly (1898) described and isolated the first filterable agent from animals, the foot-and-mouth disease virus
(13), and Walter Reed and his team (1901) recognized the
first human virus, yellow fever virus (15). By the start of the
twentieth century, the concept of viruses was firmly established.
It is interesting to note that TMV continued to play a key
role in conceptual advances in virology throughout the
twentieth century. Beginning as early as 1929, Vinson and
Petre (18) could precipitate the virus by adding selected salts
to the infectious filtrates. The treatment of viruses as chemical entities was in itself a conceptual advance. The crystalization of TMV by Wendell Stanley in 1935 (16) brought the
infectious agent into the world of the chemists, and the clear
demonstrations of protein and RNA components of TMV by
Bawden and Pirie in 1936 (1, 2) were followed by the first
"visualization" of a virus by X-ray crystallography (4). The
rods of constant diameter aligned in a hexagonal array
contained RNA and protein, and this was the earliest view of
a virus along with the first electron micrographs in Germany
in 1939 (12). The genome of TMV was first used in 1956 to
prove that infectious or genetic information could be stored
in RNA molecules (8, 9), and the concept of self-assembly
with an infectious virus was pioneered by using TMV RNA
and coat protein (5). The relationship between the genetic
information and its protein sequences as well as a confirmation of the universality of the genetic code both owe a great
MINIREVIEW
VOL. 66, 1992
deal to TMV research efforts in the 1960s and 1970s (7).
Along with the extraordinary research efforts with bacteriophages and animal viruses, the field of virology has contributed to all phases of the life sciences with new and important
concepts.
Ivanovsky died on 20 June 1920 in Ukraine. During his
forced evacuation in World War I from the University of
Warsaw where he held the chair in plant anatomy and
physiology, he lost his laboratory notebooks, his library, and
equipment. Although he may not have properly evaluated
the consequences of his discovery and during his lifetime
was not given the full recognition he may have deserved, the
field of virology that he fathered stands testimony to his
scientific achievements. In honor of Ivanovsky's work, the
USSR established the D. I. Ivanovsky Institute of Virology
in Moscow and the Academy of Medical Sciences each year
awards the D. I. Ivanovsky prize for the year's best work in
virology.
We look forward to the next 100 years of virus research.
REFERENCES
1. Bawden, F. C., and N. W. Pirie. 1937. The isolation and some
properties of liquid crystalline substances from solanaceous
plants infected with three strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Proc.
R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 123:274.
2. Bawden, F. C., N. W. Pine, J. D. Bernal, and I. Fankuchen.
1936. Liquid crystalline substances from virus infected plants.
Nature (London) 138:1051.
3. Beierinck, M. W. 1898. Concerning a contagium vivum fluidum
as a cause of the spot-disease of tobacco leaves. Verh. Akad.
Wet. Amsterdam II(6):3-21.
4. Bernal, J. D., and I. Fankuchen. 1941. X-ray and crystallo-
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
4631
graphic studies of plant virus preparations. J. Gen. Physiol.
25:147.
Butler, P. J. G., and A. Klug. 1971. Assembly of the particle of
TMV from RNA and disk of protein. Nature (London) New
Biol. 229:47.
d'Herelle, F. H. 1917. Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des
bacilles dysenteriques. C.R. Acad. Sci. 165:373-375.
Fraenkel-Conrat, H., and B. Singer. 1972. The chemical basis
for the mutagenicity of hydroxylamine and methoxyamine.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 262:264.
Fraenkel-Conrat, H., B. Singer, and R. C. Williams. 1957.
Infectivity of viral nucleic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 25:87.
Gierer, A., and G. Schramm. 1956. Die infektiositat der ribonukleinsaure des tabakmosaikvirus. Z. Naturforsch. Teil B 11:138.
Ivanovsky, D. 1882. Concerning the mosaic disease of the
tobacco plant. St. Petsb. Acad. Imp. Sci. Bul. 35:67-70.
Ivanovsky, D. 1903. On the mosaic disease of tobacco. Z.
Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenpathol. Pflanzenschutz 13:1-41.
Kausche, G. A., and H. Ruska. 1939. Die Struktur dur "kristallinen Aggregate" des Tabakmosaikvirus-proteins. Biochem. Z.
303:211.
Loeffler, F., and P. Frosch. 1898. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. 28:371.
Mayer, A. 1886. Concerning the mosaic disease of tobacco.
Landivertschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen 32:451-567.
Reed, W., J. Carroll, A. Agramonte, and J. Lazear. 1991. Senate
documents. 66(822):156.
Stanley, W. 1935. Isolation of a crystaline protein possessing the
properties of tobacco-mosaic virus. Science 81:644 645.
Stanley, W. M. 1944. Soviet studies on viruses. Science 99:136138.
Vinson, C. G., and A. W. Petre. 1929. Mosaic disease of
tobacco. Bot. Gaz. 87:14.