Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
3 pages
1 file
This book review takes a non-partisan approach to reviewing what some might see as a partisan-oriented book. My aim is to produce an honest assessment of the work under review.
Military Review, 2023
This article discusses the organizational assessment process in military organizations. It describes some of the shortcomings in modern US Army Doctrine, and offers suggestions for units to improve their assessment process in large scale combat operations.
This document convinced many people about the potential of Fightlogical study over the years. I found it again on one of my oldest hard-drive back-ups. An original copy of my 2008 Book Proposal for The Martial Arts Delusion - the first time I articulated the Unified Theory of Fighting (UTF) in public. BRIEF SYNOPSIS – Based upon the title; The Martial Arts Delusion Ever since the first divisions between schools of martial arts, there has always been the question; is unification of the martial arts possible? The modern mixed martial arts phenomenon is an example of an effort to unify the martial arts. But the unification of martial arts is only a superficial unification. The logic inherent in fighting is the grand architect of the martial arts. All martial arts must succumb to the logic of fighting in order to comply with its laws and be effective methods of self-defence. Therefore all martial arts are solutions to the problem of fighting and the need for self-defence. The Martial Arts Delusion takes a look at the laws of Fight-logic and the movements possible with the human body. By assessing fighting scientifically, it represents a paradigm shift from the importance of martial arts to learn self-defence, to the importance of understanding instinctive fight drives. The text serves as an introduction to the Unified Theory of Fighting, which proves Bruce Lee’s theory of martial arts being “Partial Truths”. Lee further stated (in his process of creating Jeet Kune Do) that we should be after the root not the branches, by recognising the causes of ignorance. The root is the Unified Theory, and the cause of ignorance is the Law of Ritualisation; discussed and defined here for the first time. With important steps towards creating a legitimate science of fighting, The Martial Arts Delusion takes significant and necessary progressions towards sacrificing some long-established “sacred cows”. The arguments of The Martial Arts Delusion provoke us to examine the martial arts under a scientific microscope leaving the martial arts community to question some long-held delusions about the martial arts. In The Martial Arts Delusion, millions of years of humanity’s understanding of fighting with at least 7 thousand years of recorded history of the martial arts converge into a single book. The Martial Arts Delusion covers Eskirmology, which is the product of humanity’s understanding of fighting, and hence there is a wealth of information which will inform the beginner and inspire the expert. The Martial Arts Delusion has the potential to change the practice and study of the martial arts forever. PROPOSAL SYNOPSIS – Written for the prospective publisher A Phenomenological & anthropological study of fighting, self-defence and the martial arts The book logically begins by defining exactly what we means by the term “fighting”, the evolution of combat, both in means, technology as well as fashion, whilst defining the kinds of fighting that exist. The next chapter deals with the issue of fighting in its most natural and raw state; "instinctive fighting" - which is determined by a fight between two (or more) uninformed constituents. Using this discussion, I define fighting as a SARC (Spontaneous Aggressive-resistant Continuum) and reason that any solution to it (as self-defence) must comply with this definition. This definition exists outside of what martial arts state fighting “should be” and right from the off, we have defined the truth of fighting (as a phenomenon). As a phenomenon, both animals and humans have created responses to it. Animal fighting is discussed in this section before moving on to the human responses. The next stage is to address the current solutions, known collectively as the martial arts - which I define as Ritualised fighting. This describes a brief history of fighting (SARC) as it has become ritualised and institutionalised, and also how social pressure forced it to conform into sports, but also becoming specialised. I outline the flaws of such methods of fighting, as well as reason as to why these have logically evolved down this path. The overriding reason is what I call the Law of Institutionalisation - the passing of knowledge from one human to another; the student continuing the teaching process, rather than the learning process. This law is at the core of the entire subject of Eskirmology. The next logical course of focus is to look at the philosophical discussions of ritualised fighting by the late Bruce Lee. Using a plethora of quotations and much back matter, I reason that Bruce Lee was one of the first martial artists of the modern era to realise that ritualised fighting cannot be applied to a SARC. We can trace within Lee's work his thought process which lead to a systematic (and scientific) discussion of fighting. We finally propose what Lee's Jeet Kune Do "should have been" and demonstrate that by classifying his approach as "Martial Art" rather than "Martial Science" it too has fallen prey to the Law of Institutionalisation. The next issue to look at is to prove that what Lee discussed was truly science. With a definition of science compared to Art, we can see that science describes that which is true, and that which is true is eternal. Using this theory, we may look back at the works of masters prior to Lee and see the same thought processes. I attempt to prove this theory by using the 1389 works of Hanko Doebringer (a medieval German martial arts master), as well as Musashi Miyomoto's Book of Five Rings (Go Rin No Sho). Taking these two master's works as an example of the eternal properties of the study of fighting, I reason that we may therefore compare and contrast the most modern scientific masters of fighting with the most ancient. To do this, I use the works of Geoff Thompson (considered one of the world's foremost experts on self-protection) and Grandfectmeister Johannes Leichtenauer (believed to have created the system described by Doebringer and used by European fight-masters for 3 centuries after his death). With this direct comparison we may accept that what works in fighting is universal, and therefore may be studied with the use of science. The next logical step is to describe the science, making explicit the core reasoning and tools required of an eskirmologist; to use these parameters to draw from the world around him, to appraise his methods for logical application and finally to draw from solutions (martial arts) which already exist. Eskirmology represents the essential paradigm shift from study of martial arts to be good at fighting (and self-defence) but to study fighting and studying which responses are the most practical whilst drawing from martial arts systems. Principles such as "Taking the middle road" (Spatial Relation from wing chun), Interception/Stop-Hit(Temporal Relation, from fencing, with roots in Leichtenauer's principle of "Indes" and found in JKD), Tai No Sen (Waiting for the initiative, as well as the Middle principle of Go Rin No Sho) are combined in the Cardinal Eskirmological Principle of "The Golden Mean". This stems from the ultimate principle of polarity from in any and every martial art (primarily in Internal martial arts) but also in those which have Unilateral or Bilateral responses. This polarity is also defined as the "Polarity-relative perspective" explaining the reasoning for why martial arts have separated into specialised fields. Using this, I have created a Tree of Knowledge from which we can see the change from a "root" to many different decisions made at many different stages. This "Root" is what I name the "Unified Fighing Theory" (UTF, or UFT). It holds that the only martial art which exists is the style of the human body in application to the logic inherent in fighting - there are only techniques defined by the body's biomechanics. Using this, we are able to describe the Universal possibilities of the human body to create a mathematical formula that describes the formation of any technique from any martial art. A technique is merely a variant upon certain core parameters. Using this idea, the fighting style of someone using UTF would be one of "no style" and of no method in particular - any which scores. The penultimate chapter is a brief yet profound one; it discusses the Metaphysics of fighting. The ethical, moral and sometime religious overtones found in the martial arts. I also make philosophical discussions about Tao, and a scientific exposition of the existence of Chi. The final chapter of the book proposes the use of science, and what would be needed to create a true martial science. The key idea would be consensus, whereby all research and techniques are considered by a variety of different martial artists and scientist in an open forum of discussion. Research would take place and the findings openly given to a community as a whole. This Eskirmological society would openly discuss the scientific study of fighting, and the martial arts so as to be a peer-reviewed scientific-method.
The lethality, precision, and global reach of the American way of war has changed the modern character of warfare, allowing the US to fight wars with fewer casualties and destruction, creating the general perception that conflicts are acceptable, safe, and clean. However, future emergence of a multipolar world, and the rise of US’s peer competitors with contradictory national interests, will increase the risks of conflict. Given the limited effectiveness of conventional warfare against the overwhelming conventional power of American military forces, future peer competitors will seek to dislocate its strengths. Furthermore, future trends such as the proliferation and affordability of commercial technologies, the increasing civilianization of war, and the importance of global media, will provide the leverage that asymmetric competitors can use to challenge the US outside the traditional military domain. Such changes will require professional military practitioners to have a better understanding of the nature of future warfare.
NWC War Gaming Department Working Paper Series, 2018
This is a primer on doing analysis and research to support decision making about warfighting. It examines the nature of warfighting as a research project, identifies and compares methods for doing decision analysis and research, and it offers suggestions for ensuring that research is useful for decision making.
Proceedings - United States Naval Institute. United States Naval Institute
Culture Bank, Seoul, Korea and Ewha Womans University, 2010
The book highlights a series of public projects that were installed and performed around Seoul, S. Korea in July 2010 and created with the theme of “combat.” Artist Mina Cheon, Professor at the Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA), and architect Gabriel Kroiz, Program Director and Professor at Morgan State University (MSU), School of Architecture and Planning worked with students from MICA and MSU of America and collaborated with students of Ewha Woman’s University’s arts and design. The culmination of the collaboration and cultural exchange included projects that responded to S. Korea’s relationship to the world culturally, politically, and economically. Through the collaboration, participating students developed group projects as well as pushing through their own individual creative works, all of them, paying particular attention to producing work that had public relevance, and creating art as public intervention. With the diverse group of students, the public projects created were those that intersected between their fields of knowledge, between fine arts, design, and architecture, and resulted in various expressions of public installations, temporary installations, performances, events, new media work, social sculpture, and social interactions. The projects were born from pure laboratory style of arts education in that the collaborative efforts and intercultural dynamics determined the outcome of the projects for the public. Both faculty and students were active participants in the melting pot of intercultural exchange. The works that came out were spirited by the synergy of the exchange, yet reflective of the global time that we live in, and directly tied to the space of Seoul, S. Korea. Culture Bank and the Art in Embassy program supported some of the works that came out of the projects and made lasting connections for those who were participant to its events. The book was co-authored by Mina Cheon and Gabriel Kroiz. Participants to "COMBAT: SPORTS + MILITARY" 2010 (Directors, Students, Visiting Critics): Mina Cheon Gabriel Kroiz Wendy Tai Andrew Pisacane Colin Van Winkle Garrett Lee Melissa Crisco Clementine InHye Jang EunYoung Lily Ko Meen Choi Christiana Duncan August Nyasha Felder YeIn Son DaEun Lee EeJin Choi SinYoung Park Ram Lee EunJi Lee SooHyung Chung SuYoung Han SoHyeong Lee WonSun Choi YeaWon Choi HaYeong Yi JiHyeon Kim JaeEun Kim YoonSu Lee SunMyung Choi Joshua Selman Annet Couwenberg Joo Hwang
Safety & Defense, 2021
Questions of how to overcome problems are probably the basic questions of fighters. Answers to them, from a historical perspective, the principles of martial art have been provided. These provisions, often mutually exclusive, raise questions related to the scientific approach to this issue. The scientific specialty dealing with the issue of combat is agonistics. This article is devoted to the presentation of the main concepts of agonistics and the general combat theory. In the first section, the author searches for an answer to the question whether an agonist meets the basic criteria of a scientific theory. The second section is devoted to the presentation of its main category, which is the concept of struggle. The last chapter refers to the purposeful cause of this theory represented by the concept of victory. This article confronts praxeological and sociological content with concepts characteristic of martial arts, and its main idea is to harmonize divergent insights on the pheno...
‘Heart’ is a word with many meanings that occupies a special place in many cultures. This presentation will explore the metaphorical association of ‘heart’, as used with reference to the combat sports, in order to better understand the qualities of a fighter and combat in general. Metaphorically and symbolically ‘heart’ is associated with courage. This association is a long- standing relationship that goes back to the ancient Greek philosophy, articulated through a rational, and natural, understand of the heart as a source of courage, and thus as a virtue. As such, courage is linked to bravery and indeed to heroism. Heart is thereby associated with the capacity to cope with fear, risk and danger. Overcoming and accepting them is an essential part of courage. The presentation will be in two parts: 1. Into the heart of fighting. We will analyse the term ‘heart’, through a philosophical genealogical exercise, highlighting its associations and meanings; 2. The heart in the fight. We will try to show the most elusive and mysterious qualities in a fighter, through a focus on the image(s) of the ‘heart’. We will use a mixed approach between pragmatism and mysticism. These two heterogeneous sources, will be developed, and their reciprocal use will be based upon, and guided through, the experience and testimonies of fighters and trainers in Muay Thai. This will be an attempt to penetrate the realm of those scarce things where words abandon us.
Toplum ve Bilim, 2004
Anuario del Instituto de Historia Argentina, 2019
Marco Merlini, Un monastero benedettino sul Monte Athos X-XIII secolo, Tipografia Editrice S. Scolastica, Subiaco, 2017
I. Görsel İşitsel Kültürde Kadın Sempozyumu, 2024
Cambridge University Press, 2020
Turai István (szerk.): Mesél a múlt. Régészeti feltárások Törökbálinton. Törökbálint 2021, 2021
Scientific Reports, 2024
Anticancer research, 2009
arXiv (Cornell University), 2020
Cambridge University Press eBooks, 2024
Anais Principais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Computação Aplicada à Saúde (SBCAS 2020), 2020
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2012