GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE (GBV) INDICATORS DEVELOPED BY GMO

REPUBLIC OF RWANDA GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE (GBV) INDICATORS DEVELOPED BY GMO Kigali, August 2011 REPUBLIC OF RWANDA GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE (GBV) INDICATORS DEVELOPED BY GMO 1 TABLE Of CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................5 DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS..........................................................................6 MINISTRY OF HEALTH..................................................................................11 INDICATORS FOR RWANDA NATIONAL POLICE.......................................19 INDICATORS FOR NPPA..............................................................................25 INDICATORS FOR SUPREME COURT.........................................................29 INDICATORS FOR MINIJUST........................................................................33 INDICATORS FOR GENDER MONITORING OFFICE..................................37 INDICATORS FOR MINEDUC........................................................................41 MINALOC INDICATORS TO REPORTED FROM THE DISTRICT LEVEL...................................................................................43 INDICATORS FOR MIGEPROF......................................................................47 INDICATORS FOR MIFOTRA.........................................................................51 INDICATORS FOR IMMAGRATION OFFICE.................................................53 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................55 2 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although Rwanda has made tremendous steps to promote gender equality and reduce gender related issues such as GBV, studies have revealed that data on this particular issue are still scarce. This situation is notably due to the inexistence of GBV indicators, which are appropriate to the context of Rwanda. In order to respond to this particular need, Gender Monitoring Ofice (GMO) has ordered the current study on GBV indicators and baseline. The purpose of this study is to equip the ofice and country in overall with a GBV monitoring framework, enabling the ofice to effectively collect information on GBV. Indeed, this information is necessary for effective prevention and response to GBV situation. The process of developing the GBV indicators and baseline has been highly consultative to ensure all GBV key actors’ needs are addressed. Two techniques have been used, namely desk review and interviews. Internal validation meetings with GMO staff were organized and were of paramount importance to determine and understand critical aspects of GBV. Results from the research clearly show the scarcity of GBV information in Rwanda. Data that are available are not most of time disaggregated, which make it impossible to determine the real magnitude of the phenomenon. In addition, these data do not match the developed indicators. Research pointed out various forms of GBV, the dominant ones being the physical, sexual, economic, and psychological ones. Similarly factors contributing to GBV include unequal gender relations, women economic dependency, feminization of poverty, ignorance, lack of self-esteem and the culture of silence. GBV 3 underreporting is due to several factors among which lack of clear referral mechanism, fear of being stigmatized by members of the community and livelihood dependency of the victim to the perpetrator. Research also shows that the government of Rwanda has deployed enormous efforts to ight against GBV at the legal, policy and institutional levels. The development of GBV indicators and baseline is an additional effort towards this objective. The purpose of this document is to assist GMO, along with it partners, to improve and expand their pragmatic efforts to prevent and respond to GBV. This is a critical tool to overcome obstacles in GBV data collection as well as the overall monitoring and evaluation to help in developing data-driven interventions. The document also will serve as a tool to better advocate for more broad-based and appropriate GBV initiatives. It will also make it possible to constitute a comprehensive GBV baseline. 4 2. INTRODUCTION Establishing Gender-Based Violence indicators is a human rights obligation, linked to both human rights jurisprudence which calls upon States, among other things, to ensure that interventions designed to combat violence are based on accurate empirical data. This requires not just the compilation of accurate information, but also of indicators that make the data accessible for non-specialist decision makers and allow public scrutiny of interventions. The Beijing Platform for Action committed governments to preventing and eliminating GBV and violence against women and the Rwandan Government have put in place different legal, policy and institutional frameworks to ensure the respect of human rights in general and promotion of gender equality in particular. Though different initiatives and measures are in place, there is still a challenge of a harmonized collection of disaggregated data and mode of reporting in the prevention of gender based violence. This situation is notably due to the inexistence of GBV indicators, In order to respond to this particular need, Gender Monitoring Ofice (GMO) conducted a study on GBV indicators and baseline to come up with a GBV monitoring framework which will facilitate GMO to track the status of GBV prevention and response. The developed indicators were based on National commitment towards different international instruments on gender in general and GBV in particular, The study came up with GBV indicators which covers the dominant forms of violence namely: physical, sexual, economic, and psychological violence, and in 5 areas of GBV prevention, GBV reporting situation, GBV response, GBV interventions’ coordination and GBV monitoring and evaluation. 5 The indings of the study shows that there is still a problem in data collection and reporting on GBV prevention and in Rwanda, and where data is gathered, it is not done in a sex disaggregated manner and does not respond to the developed indicators. This situation makes it dificult to determine the real magnitude of the phenomenon. It is believed that the development of GBV indicators will encourage a gender sensitive data collection system. 3. DEfINITION Of CONCEPTS Gender Based Violence According to the Rwandan Law n° 59/2008 of the 10/09/2008 on prevention and punishment of gender based violence, GBV is deined as “[Any] act that result in a bodily, psychological, sexual and economic harm to somebody just because they are female or male. Such act results in the deprivation of freedom and negative consequences. This violence may be exercised within or outside the household”. Therefore, gender-based violence should be seen as physical, sexual, emotional or social harm or abuse directed against a person because of his or her gender role in a given society. Gender Based Violence is also deined as “any behaviour aimed at sexual relations or any other sexual behaviour which affects the dignity of a male or a female victim, whether such behaviour may be from a superior at the work place, school or whether from families as well as from elsewhere”. As it appears, this deinition focuses on one aspect of GBV, namely sexual violence. 6 According to Shelah S. Bloom, “GBV is the general term used to capture violence that occurs as a result of the normative role expectations associated with each gender, along with the unequal power relationships between the two genders, within the context of a speciic society”1. Indicator: An instrument that gives you information. An indicator is just a long way of saying “how much” or “how many” or “to what extent” or “what size.” Indicators are ways to measure. an indicator is something that helps someone to know where he is, where he is going and to measure how far he is from his goals. An indicator is “an item of data that summarizes a large amount of information in a single igure, in such a way as to give an indication of change over time”.2 It differs from statistics in that it is usually connected to a norm or benchmark, which in the case of violence against women or Gender Based Violence, is necessary for eliminating it. Quantitative indicators: Quantitative indicators are deined as measures of quantity, such as the number of women users in a telecentre, the number of women trained in computer skills or the number of women who have access to the internet compared to men. Quantitative data have long been cited as being more objective, and seek to quantify the experiences or conditions among beneiciaries in numeric terms. 1 2 Beck, T. (1999), Using Gender-Sensitive Indicators: A Reference Manual for Governments and Other Stakeholders, Kent: Commonwealth Secretariat: 7. 7 Qualitative indicator: Qualitative indicators are deined as people’s judgments and perceptions on a subject, such as the conidence gained from acquiring computer skills to enable better employment opportunities or having access to the internet for better trading/marketing opportunities. Qualitative data are said to be more subjective. Qualitative data seek to uncover the context, perceptions and quality of, as well as opinions about, a particular experience or condition as its beneiciaries view it. It specially measures the impact of any program, policy, politic, Key Performance indicator: It is a set of quantiiable measures that a company, industry or an organization uses to compare performance in terms of meeting its strategic and operational goals. Key Performance indicators (KPIs) vary between companies and industries, depending on the priorities or performance criteria of each company or industry. Gender indicators: Are indicators that give information on gender issues, They differ from gender-sensitive indicators in that gender indicator focuses on issues other than gender relations but include data disaggregated by sex. Gender-sensitive indicators do not speciically address gender issues per se but are coined in a way that does not invisibilise women. Gender indicators are primarily used for the purpose of monitoring the not only the implementation 8 of international agreements that relates to gender equality but also used to monitor and evaluate gender issues at national level. Baseline: It is a ‘pre-operation exposure’ condition for the set of indicators that will be used to assess achievement of the outcomes and impact expressed in the programme’s logical framework. When compared with the condition of the same indicators at some point during implementation (mid-term evaluation) and post-operation implementation (inal evaluation), the baseline forms the basis for a ‘before and after’ assessment or a ‘change over time’ assessment. Without baseline data to establish pre-operation conditions for outcome and impact indicators it is dificult to establish whether change at the outcome level has in fact occurred. Gender mainstreaming: Is deined as the reorganisation, improvement, development and evaluation of policy processes so that a gender equality perspective is incorporated in all policies at all levels and all stages, by the actors normally involved in policy making. 9 10 11 GENDEER BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISM MINISTRY Of HEALTH GENDEER BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISM MINISTRY Of HEALTH Origin of indicators2 Source of information/ institution responsible3 Key data collection method4 Frequency to coll. data5 12 Indicators Current status 1. Number of health care provider trained on clinical management and psychological support on GBV cases. Yes RHRC MoH Survey Annually 2. Existence of written protocols (ALGORITHME) established for the assistance and care of GBV cases Yes RHRC, VAW/G MoH Survey Annually MoH Desk review/ Health facilities Annually Total 3. Number of cases of physical violence received. male 1 female RHRC, VAW/G 13 4. Number of cases of physical violence which have received basic set of health services in accordance with established protocols. RHRC, VAW/G 5. Number of sexual violence cases received. RHRC, VAW/G 6. Number of survivors of sexual violence who have received basic set of health services in accordance with established protocols. MoH Desk review/ Health facilities Annually MoH Desk review/ Health facilities Annually RHRC, VAW/G MoH Desk review/ Health facilities Annually 7. Total number of health units facilities (hospitals & health centres). RHRC, VAW/G MoH Survey Annually 8. Number of health facilities (hospitals & health centres) that have clinical commodities for the clinical management of GBV cases RHRC, VAW/G MoH Survey Annually 14 9. Number of health facilities with at least one service provider trained to care referrer to violence. RHRC, VAW/G MoH Desk review Annually 10. Number of people who were asked about physical and sexual violence during a visit to health facilities. RHRC MoH health facilities / survey Annually 11. Number of cases of physical violence received which were provided medical expertise for legal purpose. RHRC, VAW/G MoH health facilities / survey Annually 12. Number of survivors victims whom a psychological examination following the protocols was conducted. RHRC, VAW/G MoH health facilities / desk review Annually 13. Number of cases of survivors of rape (sexual) who have received emergency contraception within 72 hours. RHRC, VAW/G MoH, district hospital health facilities / desk review Annually RHRC, VAW/G MoH health facilities / desk review Annually 15. Number of death resulting from GBV RHRC, VAW/G MoH/Police Health facilities Annually 16. Number of GBV victims who received HIV postexposure within 48 hours RHRC MoH Health facilities/ Desk review Annually 17. Number of victim with irreversible disabilities caused by GBV RHRC MoH Health facilities/ Desk review Annually 18. Number of eligible GBV victim who become pregnant within 2 weeks after sexual assault RHRC MoH Health facilities/ Desk review Annually 19. Number of victim who become sero-converted (HIV positive) after 3 month of exposure RHRC MoH Health facilities/ Desk review Annually 15 14. Number of cases of sexual violence received which were provided medical expertise for legal purpose. RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 21. Number of GBV victim who were reffered by community to hospital RHRC MoH Health facilities/ Desk review Annually 22. Number of GBV victim who were reffered by police to hospital RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 23. Number of expertise for sexual violence victim submitted to police for legal aid RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 24. Number of expertise for physical violence victim submitted to police for legal aid RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 25. Number of physical violence transferred to hospital from health facilities RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 16 20. Number of GBV who came as himself to hospital 26. Number of sexual violence transferred to hospital from health facilities RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 27. Number of cases of sexual violence received without tangible sign RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 28. Number of cases physical violence received without tangible sign RHRC MoH Health facilities Annually 17 29. Number of hospital having police who is in charge of receiving GBV victim Annually 18 19 GENDEER BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISM RWANDA NATIONAL POLICE GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & REPORTING SITUATION INDICATORS FOR RWANDA NATIONAL POLICE Reference value in % Origin of indicators Source of information/ institution responsible Data coll. method Frequency to coll. data VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly 2. Number of cases of physical violence reported from an intimate partner (Ababana batarasezeranye). VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly 3. Number of cases of physical violence from someone other than an intimate partner in family . VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly VAW/G RNP VAW/G RNP Area of intervention and Indicators • Total Female Male PHYSICAL VIOLENCE 1. Number of reported physical violence. cases of 20 4. Number of deaths committed by spouses reported. 5. Number of cases of spousal poisoning reported. 6. Number of cases of infanticide reported. 7. Number of cases of parricide reported. Desk review Desk review Quarterly Quarterly 8. Number of inhuman and degrading punishment cases against children reported. (referance art.32 law no 27/2001 9. Number of cases of forced abortion reported. 10. Number of reported cases of sexual assault by an intimate partner (ibikorwa byiterasoni hagati yababana batarasezeranye) 11. Number of reported cases of sexual assault by a non intimate reported. ( ibikorwa byiterasoni ku batabana) VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly Desk review Annually UNSCR 1315, RHRC, VAW/G RNP RNP Desk review Annually 12. Number of reported cases of rape by an intimate reported. (kubabana batarasezeranye) RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 13. Number of reported cases of rape reported. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 14. Number of reported cases of sexual harassment by intimate partner. (guhoza ku nkeke) RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 15. Number of reported cases of sexual harassment by a non intimate partner. (iterabwoba) RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 21 RHRC, VAW/G 16. Number of reported spousal rape or unwanted sexual intercourse between spouses. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 17. Number of reported cases of destruction of genital organs. RHRC, VAW/G, , RNP Survey Annually 18. Number of cases of child sexual abuse reported/ Deilement . RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 22 19. Number of police per 10,000 population. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 20. Number of anti-GBV stationbased police RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 21. . Existence/number of safe shelter facilities at police stations. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 22. % of police disaggregated by sex. oficers RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 23. Number of police posts with private interview space in use for GBV RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 24. % of police who completed GBV training RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 25. Number reported to police RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually of GBV cases RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 27. Number of GBV cases received Total number of cases investigated RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 28. Number of cases referred (to the prosecution) /Total number of charges iled. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 29. Number of cases of child abandonment reported per sex. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 30. Number of reported cases of adult disappearing or abducted for suspected traficking. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Survey Annually 31. Number of reported cases of child disappearing or abducted for suspected traficking. RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Quarterly 32. Number of cases of adultery reported. UNSCR 1315, RHRC, VAW/G RNP Desk review Annually 26. Number of GBV referral forms to hospital. cases 23 24 25 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS INDICATORS FOR NPPA GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS INDICATORS FOR NPPA Indicators Current status1 26 TOTAL 1. Number of victim of sexual violence received 2. Number of victim of sexual violence investigated 3. Number of victim of physical violence received 4. Number of victim of physical violence investigated 5. Number of sexual violence cases that have been iled 6. Number of physical violence cases that have been iled MALE data Frequency of Key Origin of Source coll. information/ c o l l e c t i o n to indicators2 data5 i n s t i t u t i o n method4 responsible3 FEMALE RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Desk review Annually 27 7. Number of cases of physical violence Submitted to court. 8. Number of cases of sexual violence Submitted to court RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Desk review Annually 9. Average time to resolve cases of sexual violence. 10. Average time to resolve cases of physical violence RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G NPPA/GMO Desk review Annually NPPA/GMO Desk review Annually 11. Number of cases of physical violence convicted 12. Number of sexual violence convicted 13. Number of physical violence acquitted (released) 14. Number of cases of sexual acquitted 15. Number of sexual violence cases safe kept. RHRC NPPA Desk review Annually RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Survey Annually NPPA Survey Annually RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually NPPA Survey Annually RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually 16. Number of GBV physical violence cases safe kept 17. Number of prosecution ofice at intermediate and primary level with private interview space in use for GBV. 18. % of prosecutors trained on GBV 19. Number of safe shelter (houses) facilities at National, intermediate and primary level , 28 20. Number of victims of physical violence assisted on medical expertise for legal purpose. 21. Number of victims who assisted on transport, psychological service , group therapy, and accommodation 22. Number of cases of sexual violence to which ADN test was conducted. RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually RHRC, NPPA VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually Desk review Annually RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually RHRC, VAW/G NPPA Desk review Annually 29 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS INDICATORS FOR SUPREME COURT GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS INDICATORS FOR SUPREME COURT indicators Current status TOTAL FEMALE Origin of Source of indicators1 information/ institution responsible Key data Frequency c o l l e c t i o n to coll. data3 method2 MALE 30 1. Existence of GBV cases specialized courts or chambers. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 2. % of judges trained on GBV Supreme court Supreme Court Supreme Court Survey Annually 3. Number of Judge disaggregated by sex 4. Number of cases of psychological violence received RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G Desk review Annually Desk review Annually 5. Number of cases of physical violence received 6. Number of cases of sexual violence received 7. Number of cases of economical violence received 8. Number of cases of physical violence convicted in court. RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Supreme Court Supreme Court Supreme Court Desk review Annually Desk review Annually Desk review Annually Desk review Annually 31 9. Number of cases of sexual violence convicted in court. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 10. Number of cases of psychological violence convicted in court. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 11. Number of cases of economical and convicted in court. 12. Number of cases of physical violence acquitted in court. RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Supreme Court Desk review Annually Desk review Annually 13. Number of cases of sexual violence acquitted in court. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 14. Number of cases of psychological violence acquitted in court. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 15. Number of cases of economical violence acquitted in court. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 16. % of reported cases of economic violence resolved RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Desk review Annually 17. Average time to resolve cases of economic violence. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Survey Annually 18. Average time to resolve cases of sexual violence. RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Survey Annually 19. Average time to resolve cases of physical violence. 20. Average time to resolve cases of psychological violence. RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G Supreme Court Supreme Court Survey Annually Desk review Annually 32 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS 33 INDICATORS FOR MINIJUST GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS INDICATORS FOR MINIJUST INDICATORS 34 TOTAL 1. Number of cases of Physical violence received by MAJ 1.1 Number of oriented cases to Police 1.2 Number of cases received and followed-up. 1.3 Number of court submissions done 1.4 Number of base-less cases 2. Number of cases of Economical violence received by MAJ data Frequency Origin of Source of Key coll. indicators information/ c o l l e c t i o n to data3 i n s t i t u t i o n method2 responsible1 Current status MALE FEMALE RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G RHRC, VAW/G MINIJUST Desk review Annually MINIJUST Desk review Annually MINIJUST Survey Annually MINIJUST Desk review Annually CEDAW MINIJUST Every four years Interviews 35 2.1 Number of spouses whose rights on house ownership were violated. CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.2 Number of cohabitants whose rights on house ownership were violated. CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.3 Number of spouse whose rights on livestock ownership were violated. CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.4Number of cohabitants whose rights on livestock ownership were violated. CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.5 Number of spouse whose rights on land ownership were violated CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.6 Number of cohabitant whose rights on land ownership were violated CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.7 Number of spouse complaints related to family property mismanagement. CEDAW, RHRC MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.8 Number of cohabitant complaints related to family property mismanagement. CEDAW RHRC MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.9Number of cases of spouse’s control and deprivation of his/her partner’s Access to basic needs. CEDAW RHRC, MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 36 2.10 Number of cases related to children violence on family property. CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.11 Number of base-less cases CEDAW MINIJUST Interviews Every four years 2.12 % of reported cases of economic violence resolved (% of victims of economic violence who have been rehabilitated). RHRC VAW/G MINIJUST Desk review Annually 3. Number of cases of sexual violence received by MAJ RHRC, VAW/G MINIJUST Survey Annually 3.1 Number of oriented cases to Police RHRC, VAW/G MINIJUST Survey Annually 3.2 Number of cases received and followed-up. RHRC, VAW/G, UNSCR1325 MINIJUST Desk review 3.3 Number of court submissions done RHRC, VAW/G MINIJUST Survey Annually 4. Number of cases of psychological violence received by MAJ RHRC4, VAW/G MAJ, Survey Annually 4.1 Number of spouses’ cases of verbal and emotional abuse, including public humiliation, and forced separation RHRC, VAW/G MAJ, Survey Annually MONITORING AND EVALUATION 37 INDICATORS FOR GENDER MONITORING OFFICE MONITORING AND EVALUATION INDICATORS FOR GENDER MONITORING OFFICE Indicators 38 1. Existence of GBV situation baseline. 2. Existence of functional mechanism of GBV data updating. Current Situation No No 3. Existence of guidelines No governing GBV data recording and reporting grid. Source of information/ institution responsible GMO Data coll. method Frequency to coll. Data Survey Annually • National Policy against GBV GMO Survey Annually • National Policy against GBV GMO Desk review Annually Origin of indicators • National Gender Policy • National Policy against GBV 4. Existence of GBV M&E plan. No • National Policy against GBV GMO Survey Annually 5. Existence of a clear referral pathway for survivors of GBV Yes RHRC1, VAW/G GMO Survey Annually 39 40 41 INDICATORS FOR MINEDUC Indicators Current Situation 1. Existence of education curricula No on gender and GBV related issues. 2. Existence of training modules on No GBV for education staff. INDICATORS FOR MINEDUC Origin of indicators Source of information/ institution responsible CEDAW, P/ACHPR2 MINEDUC CEDAW, P/ACHPR MINEDUC Data coll. method Frequency to coll. Data Desk review Every four years Survey Every four years 42 43 MINALOC INDICATORS TO REPORTED FROM THE DISTRICT LEVEL MINALOC INDICATORS TO REPORTED FROM THE DISTRICT LEVEL Data coll. Current Situation Origin of Source of method indicators information/ institution responsible Desk review MINALOC / RHRC, 1. Number of spousal illegal districts VAW/G, , cohabitation (illegal “marriage”) Indicators Frequency to coll. Data Every four years 44 2. Number of concubinage cases RHRC, VAW/G MINALOC/ districts Desk review Annually 3. Number of women who were married under 18. RHRC, VAW/G MINALOC / districts Survey Annually 4. Existence /number of local structure (committees ) aiming at ighting against GBV P/ACHPR National GBV Policy MINALOC/ Survey Every two years districts RHRC, VAW/G MINALOC, Survey Annually 6. Number of people whose rights on land ownership were violated. 7. Number of complaints related to non access to spouse’s bank accounts. RHRC, VAW/G MINALOC, Survey Annually RHRC, VAW/G MINALOC, Survey Annually 8. Number of cases of spouse’s control and deprivation of his/ her partner’s access to basic needs. RHRC Desk review Annually 9. . Number of complaints related to family property mismanagement RHRC, VAW/G MINALOC, Survey Annually 5. Number of institutions (public/ NGOs/CBOs) providing psychosocial/counseling services to survivors of GBV. total male female MINALOC, 45 46 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & REPORTING SITUATION INDICATORS FOR MIGEPROF 47 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & REPORTING SITUATION INDICATORS FOR MIGEPROF Area of intervention and Indicators Reference value in % Origin of Source of Data coll. Frequency indicators i n f o r m a t i o n / method coll. data institution responsible to 48 1. Existence of legislative and other regulatory texte against GBV VAW/G1 MIGEPROF Desk review Every four years 2. Existence of legislative to promote gender equality, women and children’s rights protection CEDAW2 MIGEPROF Desk review Every four years 3. Existence of positive discrimination measures in favour of women. CEDAW MIGEPROF Survey Every four years 4. Existence of policies, programs and strategies against GBV. Existence of GBV prevention programmes involving men and boys at community level. VAW/G MIGEPROF Survey Every four years VAW/G MIGEPROF Survey Every two years 6. Existence/number of Civil Society initiatives to ight against GBV. MIGEPROF Survey Every four years 7. Existence/number of public institutions initiatives for the ight against GBV. MIGEPROF Survey Every two years 8. 9. Existance /Number of Anti GBV clubs Existance of awareness raising compaign againist GBV P/ACHPR National GBV Policy P/ACHPR National GBV Policy VAW/G CEDAW, BDPA3 MIGEPROF MIGEPROF Survey Desk review Every two years Every four years 5. 10. Existence/Number of local structures (Committees) aiming at ighting against GBV. 11. Existence of written protocols established for each type of GBV occurring in the setting. P/ACHPR National GBV Policy RHRC, VAW/G MIGEPROF Survey Every two years MIGEPROF Survey Annually 12. Existence of programs/projects aiming to empower victims of GBV. RHRC, VAW/G MIGEPROF Survey Annually 13. Existence module trainings for GBV victims. RHRC, VAW/G MIGEPROF Survey Annually 14. Existence RHRC, National GBV policy RHRC, VAW/G MIGEPROF Survey Annually MIGEPROF, Desk review Quarterly RHRC, VAW/G MIGEPROF, Desk review Quarterly 17. Number VAW/G MIGEPROF Desk review Annually 18. Number RHRC, National GBV policy MIGEPROF Survey Annually UNCRC4 MIGEPROF Desk review/ Survey Quarterly of women’s economic empowerment initiatives and program 15. Number 49 of inter-sectorial meeting held per year coordination 16. Existence of multi- sectorial intervention structure for coordination total of children involved in the worst forms of labor of victims of GBV who have beneited from economic empowerment programs. 19. Number of children depressed of their per sex rights male female 50 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & MECHANISM 51 INDICATORS fOR MIfOTRA GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – PREVENTION & RESPONSE MECHANISMS INDICATORS fOR MIfOTRA Reference value in % Indicators 1. 52 Number of children involved in the worst forms of labor disaggregated per sociodemographic information. Total Female Male Origin of indicators Source of information/ institution responsible Data coll. method Frequency to coll. data VAW/G MIFOTRA Desk review Annually INDICATORS fOR IMMAGRATION OffICE 53 INDICATORS fOR IMMAGRATION OffICE Reference value in % Origin of indicators Source of information/ institution responsible Data coll. method Frequency to coll. data Number of reported cases of adult disappearing or abducted for suspected traficking. RHRC, VAW/G Immigration Directorate Survey Annually Number of reported cases of child disappearing or abducted for suspected traficking. RHRC, VAW/G, , Immigration Directorate- Desk review Quarterly Area of intervention and Indicators 1. Total Female Male 54 2. CONCLUSION The development of GBV indicators is designed to provide the country with suitable information on GBV. Indeed, ighting effectively GBV requires having complete parameters of the issue. Effective GBV interventions and monitoring imply the involvement of various stakeholders. In order to make sure all GBV related needs are being eficiently addressed, Indicators will serve as a resource and a guide for developing a framework and plan of action for every institution on prevention and response to GBV. They will also serve as a guiding principle for collecting information on GBV. Indicators are not designed to be a complete checklist that all GBV actors should be positioned to report against, but are rather designed to provide guidance and capture the diversity of initiatives in place or foreseen. And every institution will be reporting accordingly . 55