Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Review of Kansas Archaeology, 2006, edited by R. Hoard and W. Banks

2006

A book review of an edited volume on Kansas archaeology

Maney Publishing Kansas Archaeology by ROBERT J. HOARD; WILLIAM E. BANKS Review by: Larry J. Zimmerman Plains Anthropologist, Vol. 51, No. 198 (May 2006), pp. 228-229 Published by: Maney Publishing on behalf of the Plains Anthropological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25670879 . Accessed: 23/01/2015 11:42 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Plains Anthropological Society and Maney Publishing are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Plains Anthropologist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 134.68.47.120 on Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:42:58 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions PLAINS ANTHROPOLOGIST Vol. 51, No. 198, 2006 Wichita State, and theUniversity ofKansas, a dem onstration that these institutionshave matured to Ellis also weaves native voices throughout the text,following theadvice the lateHenry Topfi, Sr., who told him "Remember, son, don't forget toput us in the story.We want to be heard. And do what the level where they regularly produce students who work on Kansas sites and materials. Some of these archaeologists are authors o^Kansas Archae you can to get itright" (p. 10). Small missteps are encountered, such as re ferring to Cannonball, North Dakota, as Cannon, ology essays. An introduction and fifteen chapters present a thorough picture of pre-Contact archaeology in as well as a few missing citations. The introduc tion contains interjections by Ellis that at times distract from the text.These, however, are minor points in a well-written study. Kansas. Two chapters by Rolfe Mandel provide a fine overview of the environments and landforms of the Late Quaternary and onward. He empha sizes the importance of understanding changing landscapes and their impacts on people, on preser vation, and on how we seek the archaeological A Dancing People is a needed and successful contribution to powwow studies and a welcomed addition toAmerican Indian Studies in general. Ellis clearly has followed the advice given tohim. record.The remaining chapters approximately fol low the cultural sequence of the state. JeanetteBlackmar and JackHofman provide a thorough coverage of the broad spectrum adap tations of thePaleoarchaic inhabitants of the state from 11,500 to 3000 B.P. They offer a frank as sessment of what's missing in our understanding J. Edited by ROBERT Archaeology. AND WILLIAM Univer E. BANKS. sityPress ofKansas, Lawrence, 2006. xiii+432 pp., Kansas HOARD figures, tables, appendix, references cited, index. $34.95 (Cloth; ISBN 0-7006-1428-1). Reviewed byLarry J.Zimmerman, IUPUI/Eiteljorg Museum Kansas has been a particularly fortunate state when itcomes tobooks about itsarchaeology. Most Plains states are lucky to have a single volume; Kansas now has three.Alfred Johnson begins his forward to thisvolume with a comment on theworn 1959 Introduc condition of his copy ofWedel's tion toKansas Archaeology, and Imust admit that my copy ismuch the same. Pat O'Brien wrote her 1984 Archaeology inKansas for a vocational ar chaeologists and provided an engaging summary. As important, she provided information about ar chaeological heritage preservation and citizen in volvement. Kansas Archaeology provides a welcome update toWedel and O'Brien, pulling together a wide range of informationand sources, much of it from theCRM "gray literature" thataccumulated in the 1980s and 90s. Making the results of this literaturemore generally available was an explicit goal of the editors and deserves no small amount of praise. The authors also use many of the fine papers, MA theses, and doctoral dissertations that have been generated by studentsfromKansas State, of the cultural lives of the earliest Kansas inhabit ants, from origins to domestic life. Brad Logan covers easternKansas Woodland adaptations well, and notes the persistent question of the role of EasternWoodland peoples in theformation of east ern PlainsWoodland. He considers thedebate over diffusion of ideas from theMidwest versus immi gration of IllinoisWoodland folk tobe "simplistic and artificially dualistic" (p. 76). He suggests that Kansas archaeologists have overemphasized mi nor differences inLate Woodland when they should recognize the commonalities resulting from the fluidmovement of people and ideas thatpromoted homogeneity. John R. Bozell considers western Plains Woodland and notes that it"marked thebe ginning of the end of 10,000 years of a largely nomadic, hunting-gathering, nonhorticultural ex istence on thePlains" (pi02-3). Donna Roper provides a masterful summary of theCentral Plains tradition (CPt), which is no easy taskgiven that it is one of thecomplexes about which Plains archaeologists have had some of the greatest taxonomic arguments. Her discussion of theproblem of the identityof CPt descendants ech oes Logan's comments about Woodland and the fluidityof communities and identities, remarking monolithic assessments of ancestor-descendant that 228 This content downloaded from 134.68.47.120 on Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:42:58 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Brad Logan, Editor Book Reviews chapters provide ample ethnohistoric evidence of themalleability and fluidityof ethnic boundaries that is discussed in some of the earlier chapters relations between CPt peoples and historic tribes have ceased tobe useful. Laura Scheiber discusses the late prehistoric cultures of High Plains Upper Republican and Dismal River. The distinctive as and to which Plains archaeologists should pay greater attention in their taxonomic analyses. The final chapters and appendix aremore data oriented.Mary Adair provides a cogent summary semblages of these complexes have led research ers to obsess over their cultural identities. Lauren Ritterbush handles Oneota, a complex thatreflects many of the same questions about the nature of of paleoethnobotanical research, as does C. Mar tin Stein on lithic resources. An especially useful ethnogenesis considered by other authors. Her at tention is ultimately driven toward thematter of interactions. She notes thatalthough Oneota?CPt feature inAdair's essay is her table on AMS dates on cultigens from Central Plains sites. Similarly, Stein provides listsof recorded quarries and work shop sites. The appendix is a list of calibrated ra evidence for it is limited, interaction between Oneota and other peoples in southern Kansas is clear and likely was a mechanism that helped Oneota people adapt to Plains life. Donald Blakeslee andMarlin Hawley review theGreat Bend aspect and call formore work to be done on origins, as well as on relationships of diocarbon dates organized by themajor complexes addressed by this volume. Unfortunately, in a brief review papers can not receive theattention theymerit, but all are thor ough and useful, and combined, provide impres sive coverage of a state's archaeology. I've seen none better for any state. The authors ofKansas and toWheeler/Edwards. and C. Tod Bevitt look at the the complex toNeosho Scott Brosowske Archaeology apparently did not write with avocational archaeologists inmind, and thejargon and taxonomy probably will be a bit overwhelm ing for non-specialists. At the same time, contri Odessa phase, Pratt and Bluff Creek complexes, and a number of other unaffiliatedMiddle Ceramic sites in southern Kansas and nearby Oklahoma. They draw attention to the fact that thePlains Bor der area had a largerpopulation fromA.D. 1200 1500 thanmany realize, a product of patches of fertile soils along perennial streams. butions of avocational archaeologists toKansas archaeology are mentioned often, and the editors tryhard to provide some relief to non-specialist Three chapters look at thehistorically known tribes in the state. Susan Vehik examines Wichita ethnohistory stating that "by the time the various Wichita subdivisions entered the historic record, theyhad already undergone a period of profound ...change thatbegan in the fifteenthcentury" (p. 218), change thatechoes from the archaeological record. JamesMarshall presents an anecdotal his toryof theKansa as a source tobe used by archae ologists and notes thatan archaeological anteced ent forKansa is unclear. He rightly suggests that thatKansa oral tradition should be used by archae ologists and may lead to an archaeological link. Donna Roper delves into the ethnohistory and ar readerswith theirexcellent introduction.They very succinctly discuss timedepth, dating, archaeologi cal theory,and taxonomy, as well as acknowledge the importance of the use of Indian oral tradition. Any Plains archaeologist will finda great deal to thinkabout in thiswell-organized, well-written volume. Certainly there is variation between the pieces in depth of coverage and writing style, but Hoard and Banks were able to smooth over some of this by providing a common framework that asked each author at least to address key areas of research and to note what research questions re mained. chaeology of the Pawnee, a task as daunting and well done as her chapter on CPt. Her attention to non-village bison hunting sites is useful, particu larly the discussion of sacred sites. These three the years go by and our databases grow, like Kansas Archaeology will become increasingly difficult to assemble. They are worth the effort,however, as the authors and editors of As volumes this volume have unquestionably demonstrated. 229 This content downloaded from 134.68.47.120 on Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:42:58 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions