The 2008
Glaciological Survey
Central Alps - Lombardy
Scientific coordination, tex t and data processing:
R iccardo Scotti, Andrea Toffaletti, Luca Bonardi,
Paolo Pagliardi
Mountain sectors and operators (76)
SPLUGA-LEI
L. Colzani, E. Congiu, M. D’Amico, M. Felisa, S. Losa, B. Mezzera, F. Rossini, C. Scolari,
R. Scotti, F. Villa
CODERA-MASINO
L. Colzani, G. Di Gallo, M. Marzorati, R. Scotti, A. Barilli
DISGRAZIA-MALLERO
D. Airoldi, A. Almasio, I. Bollati, F. Cambieri, M. Fransci, G. Di Gallo, L. Muchetti, P. Pagliardi,
M. E. Peroschi, G. Rovedatti, R. Scotti, M. Urso
BERNINA
D. Bellingeri, M. Butti, L Colzani, A. Galluccio, D. Gerussi, M. Gianatti, P. Pagliardi, A. Salvetti,
R. Scotti, M. Zambenedetti
2008 glaciological
Survey
SCALINO-PAINALE
M. Butti, E. Benedetti, M .Gianatti
DOSDE’-LIVIGNO
S. Alberti, A. Bera, G. Cola, D. Colombarolli, L. Colzani, D. De Felice, A. Galluccio,
F. Galluccio, M. Gianatti, P. Pagliardi, D. Parrino, S. Ratti, M. Marzorati, R. Scotti,
C. Speranza
ORTLES-CEVEDALE
C. Bessi, L. Bolognini, L. Bonetti, A. Borghi, P. Bottio, R. Bottio, G. Casartelli, G. Catasta,
G. Cola, D. Colombarolli, L. Colzani, L. Farinella, M. Fioletti, A. Galluccio, Ac Galluccio,
M. Gianatti, E. Meraldi, P. Pagliardi, A. Scaltriti, C. Scolari, R. Scotti; F. Strozzi,
M. Zambenedetti
ADAMELLO
C. Bessi, P. Cinanni, M. Frosio, A. Elli, L. Imberti, G. Lojacono, A. Mussi, V. Paneri,
P. Pagliardi, D. Perego, P. Reale, F. Roveda, R. Scotti, A. Toffaletti, M. Zambenedetti
OROBIE
S. Anghileri, E. Benedetti, R. Bianchi, M. Butti, S. D’Adda, D. Gerussi, M. Gianatti,
M .Fransci, F. Locatelli, F. Mocci, D. Perego, L. Pironi, G. Rovedatti, A. Scherini, V. Sciaresa,
R. Scotti, A. Sesini, S. Vigani, F. Villa
- 22 -
The 2008 Glaciological survey1
1
a slight decrease. Despite the very negative
scenario, this is a slight improvement over the
previous year, when all glaciers had strong to
moderate decrements. Curiously, the sectors
whose snow cover was better than their historical average value in the early summer days
were the ones to suffer the worst decrements.
What
are
the
explanations
for
such
a
negative
season?
The answer has implicitly been outlined in
the snow-meteorological report already.
Despite an amount of precipitation in line
with the average value for the season,
thanks mainly to the April-May period, the
snow did not last until the end of the season; such result is a consequence of the
high temperature of the summer months.
The thickness reduction of the glacier’s fronts
was comparable to that of previous years; the
frequent May precipitations probably led to a net
differentiation between the upper basins, well
fed by snowfalls, and their rain-washed termini.
By the end of July, the residual snow had
disappeared almost everywhere under 3200
m a.s.l., letting the hot August and early
September days to melt down the exposed
ice and, where present, most of the residual
snow. Locally, the snow cover lasted till the
end of the season above 3300 m a.s.l. and on
some glaciers with avalanche accumulation.
The SGL Glaciological Survey, though delayed
by the abundant snowfall of mid-September,
has nevertheless produced meaningful data,
having investigated 95,4% of the glacialized
surface of the Region. The most important
results are the largely negative mass balances and the investigation of morphologies
peculiar to a phase of glacial dissolution: the
deep bédières (Campo Nord), the ever wider
For the survey methodology see www.sgl.cluster.it
- 23 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
“How did the glaciers fare during the last summer?” This is the most frequent question that
mountain lovers, friends and curious people
have been asking us since last September.
Such direct and concise question is worth a
similarly short and clear answer: “Badly”. Then
the astonished speaker: “But why? A bad summer again? With all the snow that fell down ...
and the bad weather we have had …” At this
point, it is worth to analyse in depth a season
that, despite the very negative result, has
shown some shy signals of a recovery if compared to the glaciological disasters of the past
few years. The differences among the various
mountain sectors of Lombardy, almost zeroed
during the last years because of very negative
dynamic indexes everywhere, this year have
become visible again. So, it is clear that the
western sectors have fared better than the
eastern ones: the Spluga/Lej, Codera/Masino,
Disgrazia, Orobic Alps, though undergoing a
negative season, have ended with some residual snow coverage over all apparatuses.
Photographic observations and ield surveys
proved that some small glaciers had an almost
positive season: the best examples are: Mortee, Calvo, Rasica Est, Cassandra Centrale,
Dente di Coca and Pizzo dell’Omo Ovest. Unfortunately all are very small apparatuses; their
combined size being only 2% that of the Adamello Glacier which, on the other side, had a
heavily negative season. For the same reason,
all glaciers belonging to the SGL sample list
showed a negative trend versus the 2007 situation. The 47 glaciers of the sample were chosen for their size and for being representative
of their own sectors. 23,4% of them showed a
dynamic index pointing to a strong decrease,
59,4% to a moderate decrease and 19,2% to
moraine cover, the frequent dismemberments induced by the loss of mass (Passo
di Chiareggio, Venerocolo, Porola), the formation and widening of proglacial lakes (particularly important is the widening of the Est
Fellaria proglacial lake) and the lessening of
break-up morphologies (crevasses, seracs).
Hence, briely, the negative trend for our
glaciers continued in 2008 as well, though
we could say something like “better than
worse”. Coming from years that were anticipating the glaciological and climatic scenarios predicted for the end of XXI century, this might be of some satisfaction.
The data of the 2008 Survey
2008 glaciological
Survey
During the 2008 Glaciological Survey, 96 glaciers were subjected to a complete glaciological
survey 1(36,5% of existing glaciers); their combined area was 9061,4 ha or 83,6% of Lombardy
glacialized surface. Adding the photographic observations2 (103) the number of glacial apparatuses, inclusive of both glaciers and glacierettes, increases to 199 (75,7 % of all glacial bodies
or 95,4 % of the entire regional glacial area).
Tab. 1: total glacialized regional surface investigated during the 2008 Glaciological Survey and comparisons
with the previous biennium (absolute values in ha and %) (* without photographic observations).
Year
Total regional area covered
by glaciers (ha)
Total area investigated
(ha)
Total area surveyed (%)
2006
11.004,7
8.690,0
79*
2007
10.967,7
10.242,8
93,3
2008
10.838,6
10.344,1
95,4
1 Complete glaciological survey means that a detailed on-site investigation was performed by the designated
operators; where possible, their evaluation included: snow line altitude, minimum altitude of the front, front
measurements. Operators also remarked the morphologies variations versus the previous survey.
2 Photographic observation means that a glacier is investigated through one or more photos taken from
selected photographic stations to allow meaningful comparisons over the years. Such observations do not
provide dynamic indexes.
- 24 -
Tab. 2: Summary of 2008 surveys and photographic observations (sectors and total).
Spluga
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Glaciers (n°)
8
3
11
13
(% of total
number)
61,5
23,1
84,6
Area (ha)
(% of total area)
215,5
33,6
249,1
263,6
81,8
12,7
94,5
Codera-Masino
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
4
12
16
26
15,4
46,2
61,5
88,5
86,9
175,4
227,8
38,8
38,1
77,0
11
13
24
28
39,3
46,4
85,7
814,3
122,1
936,4
955,7
85,2
12,8
98,0
8
2
10
13
61,5
15,4
76,9
2151,1
46,1
2197,2
2230,2
96,5
2,1
98,5
2
1
3
8
25,0
12,5
37,5
200,9
3,3
204,2
226,4
88,7
1,5
90,2
7
10
17
20
35,0
50,0
85,0
209,7
193,1
402,8
429,8
48,8
44,9
93,7
6
1
7
11
54,5
9,1
63,6
118,1
11,9
130,0
146,0
80,9
8,2
89,0
24
15
39
55
43,6
27,3
70,9
2788,2
525,3
3313,5
3576
78,0
14,7
92,7
12
17
29
39
30,8
43,6
74,4
2356,8
141,6
2498,4
2527,1
93,3
5,6
98,9
14
29
43
50
28,0
58,0
86,0
118,3
118,8
237,1
256
46,2
46,4
92,6
Area (ha)
(% of total area)
9.061,4
1.282,7
10.344,1
10.838,6
83,6 %
11,8 %
95,4 %
-
Disgrazia-Mallero
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Bernina
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Scalino-Painale
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Dosdè-Piazzi
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Ortles
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Adamello
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Orobie
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers
Glaciers (n°)
Complete surveys
Photographic observations
Survey + Photo observations
Total existing glaciers (2007)
96
103
199
263
(% of total
number)
36,5 %
39,2 %
75,7 %
-
- 25 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
Livigno
ANALYSIS OF VARIATIONS
This chapter presents data and information collected during the 2008 surveys. The dynamic
phase of each glacier is evaluated on the basis of the last available survey.
Variations versus 2007
All 47 glaciers, when compared with their 2007 data, are in a shrinking phase, with a net prevalence (80,8%) of strong and moderate decrements. The tendency of the last years is conirmed
and 2008 is the 4th consecutive year in which 100% of sampled glaciers were reported in a
decrement phase when compared against their previous survey.
The statistical analysis highlights the negative peak of the Ortles–Cevedale Sector, with 4 strong
decrements and 7 moderate decrements.
Tab. 3: 2008 dynamic phases of Lombardy glaciers.
2008 glaciological
Survey
Total
Uncertain
New
strong
moderate
Stable
slight
moderate
strong
extinct
Mountain sector
slight
Increment phase
Decrement phase
Spluga-Lei
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
Codera-Masino
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Disgrazia-Mallero
0
0
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
Bernina
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Scalino-Painale
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Dosdè-Piazzi
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Livigno
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Ortles-Cevedale
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Adamello
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Orobie
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Total
%
0
11
27
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
47
0%
23,4%
57,4%
19,2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Totali
%
47
0
0
0
0
47
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Tab. 4: The overall dynamic phase of Lombardy glaciers over the last 7 hydrological years.
Hydrological year
% Decreasing
glaciers
% Stable glaciers
% Increasing
glaciers
% Uncertain
glaciers
2001-2002
90,4
6,7
1,0
1,9
2002-2003
100,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
2003-2004
73,6
8,0
17,3
1,1
2004-2005
100,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
2005-2006
100,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
2006-2007
100,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
2007-2008
100,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
- 26 -
Fig. 1: The dynamic index of glaciers surveyed during the 2008 glaciological survey, as % over the total
number (each column shows the total number of glaciers in that class).
2008 glaciological
Survey
Fig. 2: The Vedretta del Mandrone on September 20, 2008, when the the reading of the ablation stakes at the
snout of the glacier took place. The glacier was covered by 10 cm of fresh snow fallen a few days earlier that
had ended the 2008 ablation season (photo by A. Toffaletti).
- 27 -
Snow Line
Altitude
Minimum
altitude (m)
Terminus
variation
Glacier
Dynamic
Phase
Tab. 5: the list of glaciers surveyed in 2008 and the comparison with their previous surveys. Also indicated
are: the front variation, the minimum altitude of the front (QMF), the snow line altitude, a brief note and the
glaciological operators involved.
Note: for the details of dynamic phases, see tab. 10 at the end of the chapter.
Notes (Operators)
Settore Spluga/Lei
Pizzo Ferrè
DF
-0,5
2698
irr.
20% of total surface covered by residual snow; further thinning. (E. Congiu, S. Losa)
Suretta S
DL
-22,5
2700
n.v.
Mass balance measured with differential GPS, scarce residual snow cover
(F. Villa, R. Scotti)
Ponciagna
DM
n.v.
thickness loss; residual snow cover almost absent (L. Colzani)
Cima di Lago W
DL
N.M.
n.v.
recent snow cover, snow line not assessable, front shrinkage (L. Colzani)
Codera/Masino
Sivigia NE
DM
Passo di Bondo
DL
Pioda S
DM
2530
-16,5
2810
2850
residual snow covering 15% of the surface, lower sector in a dismemberment phase (A. Barilli, L. Colzani)
3070
snow cover only at the base of the rocky cliffs, moderate loss of thickness
(M. Marzorati)
n.v.
the link to the patch below 3064 m a.s.l. (CTR) has dissolved; snow cover
hard to evaluate (G. Di Gallo)
2008 glaciological
Survey
Disgrazia/Mallero
Predarossa
DM
-5
2625
3300
residual snow cover under Sella di Pioda and at the base of the cliffs, the
separation of upper and lower sectors is progressing (M. Urso, I. Bollati,
D. Airoldi)
Cassandra E
DL
-11,5
2915
3180
good residual snow cover, strong thinning at the front. (R. Scotti, M. Fransci)
Ventina
DM
-6,5
2222
2950
irregular snow cover, though more consistent than in previous years; overall thinning of the tongue (M. E. Peroschi, F. Cambieri)
Pizzo Ventina
DL
2470
2650
avalanche accumulations over the 40% of the surface (M. E. Peroschi, F.
Cambieri, M. Urso, A, Almasio)
Disgrazia
DM
-2
2610
2900
more extensive snow cover in comparison with previous years, though
insuficient to achieve an equilibrium balance (P. Pagliardi)
Sissone
DM
-58
2600
2950
strong withdrawal of the front and substantial morphologic variations in the
lower part; snow cover over 40% of the surface (A. Almasio)
Vazzeda
DM
N.M.
3000
residual snow cover scarcer than nearby glaciers (A. Almasio, R. Scotti,
M. Urso, I. Bollati, D. Airoldi)
Pizzo Tremogge
DL
N.M.
3010
n.v.
no substantial changes; slight thinning. (M. Urso, I. Bollati, D. Airoldi)
Scerscen Inf.
DM
-5
2640
n.v.
overall thinning of the lower portion (A. Salvetti, D. Bellingeri, L. Colzani)
Scerscen Sup.
DM
2750
3170
thinning tongue; 155 cm of ice lost at 3100 m (A. Galluccio, M. Zambenedetti, P. Pagliardi, L. Colzani)
Bernina
Caspoggio
DF
Fellaria W
DM
Fellaria E
DL
N.M.
n.v.
N.M.
dramatic mass loss, negligible snow cover (L. Colzani)
3400
right low detached; scanty snow cover. (M. Butti, P. Pagliardi)
3450
fairly good residual snow cover towards the Fellaria Plateau, evolution of
the tongue with a remarkable widening of the proglacial lake (M. Butti, P.
Pagliardi, D. Gerussi)
Scalino/Painale
Pizzo Scalino
DF
-10
2620
ass.
negligible snow cover; dramatic, overall thinning. (M. Butti)
Dosde'/Piazzi
Cardonnè
DF
2530
3100
irregular snow cover, northern wall decaying (A. Galluccio, G. Cola)
- 28 -
Dynamic
Phase
Terminus
variation
Minimum
altitude (m)
Snow Line
Altitude
Notes (Operators)
Dosdè E
DM
-20
2560
3000
irregular residual snow cover, strong withdrawal, loss of mass (F. Galluccio, S. Ratti)
Val Viola W
DM
-13
2825
irr
small ields of residual snow, substantial decrement (S. Ratti, F. Galluccio)
Val Nera W
DM
Campo N
DF
Saliente
DM
Vitelli
DM
Zebrù
DM
Zebrù E
Glacier
Livigno
n.v.
-18
2840
scarce snow cover since the beginning of August (S. Alberti, R. Scotti)
3100
new weather station installed, 220 cm of ice lost at 2985 m a.s.l.(D. Colombarolli, A. Bera)
irr.
residual snow cover at the base of the cliffs over the about 30% of the
surface; fully covered by debris (S. Ratti)
Ortles/Cevedale
3160
residual snow cover on the accumulation basin; front area in a dismemberment phase. (A. Scaltriti, A. Galluccio)
2600
n.v.
areal shrinkage (A.C. Galluccio)
DM
-13,5
2843
n.v.
loss of mass in the left frontal area. (A. Galluccio)
Forà
DF
-26
2760
n.v.
detachment of an ice lens with morainic cover in the snout area; strong
retreat (L. Colzani)
Gran Zebrù
DF
-11
2990
ass.
no residual snow, thinning front, dramatic shrinkage. (D. Colombarolli, M.
Fioletti)
Cedec
DM
-9
n.v.
indented front, very signiicant mass loss at the snout (D. Colombarolli,
M. Fioletti)
Palon de la Mare
DM
-13
3012
3400
residual snow cover over the 20% of the surface, clear shrinking of the
snout. (L. Farinella, C. Bessi)
Forni
DF
-13
2510
3500
very scarce snow cover, as in 2007; dramatic overall mass loss (G. Cola)
Dosegù
DM
-38,5
2850
3300
strong retreat at the snout, good snow cover over the accumulation basin
(A. Borghi, L. Bolognini)
Sforzellina
DM
-3,5
2800
ass.
some moderate avalanche accumulations, overall mass loss (R. Bottio)
Alpe S
DF
N.M.
ass.
no snow cover, evident overall loss of mass (L. Bonetti, P. Pagliardi, G.
Cola)
Adamello
Pisgana W
DF
-24
2565
ass.
overall loss of mass, weak link with the accumulation basin (F. Roveda)
Venerocolo
DM
-12
2570
3150
very scarce snow cover (15% of the surface area); now separated from
the Vedretta dei Frati (A. Toffaletti)
Avio Centrale
DM
2900
snow cover, from avalanches only, over 30% of the surface area; moderate withdrawal (C. Bessi, G. Catania)
Aviolo
DM
irr
thinning of the central portion, snow in the upper sectors and right hydrographical side (P. Pagliardi)
Adamello
DF
3300
scarce snow cover, signiicant mass loss below 3200 m (P. Pagliardi, D.
Perego, A. Toffaletti, A. Elli)
Marovin
DL
-6
2060
2200
residual snow cover over the 50% of the surface, slightly negative mass
balance (M. Butti)
Lupo
DL
0
2440
2620
residual snow cover over 40% of the surface, snout unchanged, slightly
negative mass balance (R. Scotti, F. Villa, S. D’Adda, F. Mocci, A. Mussi,
L. Imberi, P. Cinanni)
Porola
DM
2540
n.v.
the lower sector has split from the accumulation basin in the steepest
central portion (M. Merati)
Trobio W
(Tre Conini)
DM
irr
very scarce snow cover. Ice withdrawal at the front and near the rocky cliff,
negative mass balance (S. D’Adda, F. Mocci)
2730
Orobie
Abbreviations: N.M.: Not measured; n.v.: Not evaluated; ass: Absent; irr.: Irregular
- 29 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
-17
Variations versus previous surveys (before 2007)
Tab. 6: The dynamic index of glaciers surveyed in 2008 which had their previous survey before 2007
(totals: number of glaciers in each class and their % over the total).
moderate
strong
New
Uncertain
Total
Stable
0
0
0
4
slight
0
moderate
0
Mountain sector
strong
slight
Increment phase
Decrement phase
extinct
2008 glaciological
Survey
Fig. 3: The small Vedretta di Remulo (Adamello Massif), despite its low altitude, does not show many variations versus the previous survey (2003). The protection offered by the rocky wall and the avalanche accumulations has kept this glacial apparatus substantially stable. (September 18, 2008; photo by V. Paneri).
Spluga- Lei
0
2
2
0
Codera-Masino
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Disgrazia-Mallero
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Bernina
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Scalino-Painale
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Dosdè-Piazzi
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Livigno
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
Ortles-Cevedale
3
6
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
Adamello
4
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
Orobie
1
3
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
10
Totali
%
Totali
%
0
11
17
11
3
3
0
0
0
0
4
49
22,4%
34,7%
22,4%
6,1%
6,1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6,2%
100%
42
0
0
0
4
49
63,3%
0%
0%
0%
6,2%
100%
- 30 -
The 46 glaciers considered in this section were
not surveyed in 2007; comparisons are only
possible with 2006 data or earlier, up to 1996
(Passo Savoretta Glacier). The predominant
dynamic phase is one of “decrement” (63,3%)
while 22,4% of all surveyed glaciers were found
extinct. The number of extinctions collected in
2008 conirms the trend of the previous glaciological surveys: altogether, 46 glaciers have
disappeared between 2005 and 2008.
Figg. 4 and 5: (left) the Verva Maggiore Glacier (Dosdè-Piazzi Sector) in 2008 (photo by D. Parrino) and (right,
photo by V. Bianchi) in 2003, date of the previous survey. The glacial retreat is quite evident; the terminus has
moved upvalley more than 300 m in 5 years.
2008 glaciological
Survey
Fig. 6: The dynamic index of the glaciers surveyed in 2008 which had their previous survey before 2007.
- 31 -
Last survey
Snow Line
Altitude
Minimum
altitude (m)
Terminus
variation
Glacier
Dynamic
Phase
Tab. 7: List of the glaciers surveyed in 2008 and comparison with their previous surveys (prior to 2007). Also
indicated are: the front variation, the minimum altitude of the front (QMF), the snow line altitude, the date of the
previous survey, a brief note and the glaciological operators involved. Note: for the details of dynamic phases,
see tab. 10 at the end of the chapter.
Notes (Operators)
Settore Spluga/Lei
irr.
2005
some residual snow from avalanches, loss of mass, abundant
debris coverage (F. Rossini, C. Scolari, E. Congiu)
DM
irr.
2002
20% residual snow cover (R. Scotti, E. Congiu)
DF
irr.
2002
wide, but irregular, seasonal snow cover, dramatic loss of
mass (E. Congiu)
DF
irr.
2001
good residual seasonal snow cover, dramatic overall loss of
mass (E. Congiu)
Pizzo Quadro N
DM
Tambò
Orsareigls
Morteè
N.M
Codera/Masino
n.v.
2005
snow frustrate a precise evaluation, very slight surface variation (A. Barilli, R. Scotti)
Pizzo Torrone
I
Corni Bruciati I
DM
2620
n.v.
1998
unchanged area; loss of mass, thickening debris coverage
(M. Urso, I. Bollati, D. Airoldi)
Corni Bruciati II
DM
2660
n.v.
1998
unchanged area, loss of mass (M. Urso, I. Bollati, D. Airoldi)
Passo di Chiareggio
DF
2750
2850
2005
residual snow cover in the upper portion, the debris covered
tongue has detached from the rest of the glacier (A. Almasio)
Disgrazia/Mallero
-580
2008 glaciological
Survey
Bernina
Fellaria Centrale
DF
2950
1999
full morainic cover, drastic loss of mass, avalanches accumulation (M. Butti)
Fellaria Sup. I
DF
2950
2000
drastic loss of mass, fairly good seasonal snow cover (M.
Butti, D. Gerussi)
Fellaria Sup. Ii
DF
n.v.
2000
drastic loss of mass, fairly good seasonal snow cover (M.
Butti, D. Gerussi)
Scalino/Painale
Pizzo Painale SW
2830
DF
n.v.
2001
70% snow cover, dramatic overall loss of mass (E. Benedetti)
Dosdè/Piazzi
Verva Minore
Verva Maggiore
E
DF
-331
2775
ass.
2002
reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (D. De Felice, C.
Speranza, D. Parrino)
2003
major terminus retreat, drastic mass and surface loss (D. De
Felice, C. Speranza, D. Parrino)
Cantone di Dosdè II
E
1998
reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (S. Ratti, F. Galluccio)
Dosde' W Inf.
E
1999
reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (S. Ratti, F. Galluccio)
Val Nera E
I
n.v.
2002
full morainic cover, some patches of residual snow (early observation) (R. Scotti)
Val Nera Centrale
I
n.v.
2002
fully covered by debris (S. Alberti, R. Scotti)
Monte Val Nera
I
n.v.
2002
good snow cover (August 3) (S. Alberti, R. Scotti)
Livigno
Ortles/Cevedale
Campo
DM
n.v.
2002
snow cover on the orographic left side, loss of mass versus
the last survey (G. Cola, R. Scotti)
Coninale W
DF
ass.
2000
no snow cover, wide morainic cover, drastic decrement from
the last survey (D. Colombarolli)
- 32 -
Snow Line
Altitude
Last survey
ass.
2003
no residual snow cover, 2 huge landslides cover 30% of its
surface (G. Cola)
San Giacomo S
DF
ass.
2000
almost fully covered by debris, no snow cover, loss of mass
since the previous survey (G. Cola)
Pizzo Tresero N
DM
ass.
2002
several debris lows over the ice, almost without snow cover
since the beginning of August (A.C. Galluccio)
2002
negligible, residual ice mass at the edge of the proglacial lake
(P. Pagliardi)
Punta Sforzellina W
Sobretta NE Sup.
Minimum
altitude (m)
DM
Terminus
variation
Col de la Mare
Dynamic
Phase
Notes (Operators)
Glacier
E
DF
irr.
2002
patch of ice with some residual snow (G. Cola, R. Scotti)
E
ass.
2002
full debris cover, reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (G.
Cola, R. Scotti)
Sobretta NW
DF
3220
2002
separation of the upper right plate, strong retreat (D. Colombarolli)
Profa
DF
n.v.
1998
separation of the left plate, strong shrinkage (D. Colombarolli)
Monte Gavia NW
DL
2980
2000
full snow cover, positive annual balance, slight mass loss from
the last survey (D. Colombarolli)
Passo Savoretta
E
ass.
1996
small ice patch covered by debris, reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (D. Colombarolli)
DF
ass.
2002
no snow cover, strong shrinkage (P. Pagliardi)
Sobretta NE Inf.
Pietre Rosse N
Piano delle Platigliole
2980
small patch of irn and snow of aeolian origin, irstly observed
in 2007 (A. Galluccio, P. Pagliardi)
NEO
Adamello
small, debris buried ice patch, reclassiied as “minor glacial
formation” (A. Toffaletti)
2730
2002
full snow cover, slight decrement from the last survey (P.
Pagliardi)
2800
2002
extended snow cover, slight decrement from the last survey
(P. Pagliardi)
2900
2003
minimal size but substantially unchanged from the previous
survey, full snow cover (V. Paneri)
E
2002
reduced to a small patch, reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (V.Paneri)
E
2000
no residual snow or ice (V. Paneri)
E
Cima Laste N
DL
Cima Wanda
DL
Remulo
S
Macesso
Triangolo
2900
Orobie
Monte Torena Sup.
S
2740
2740
2000
full snow cover, substantially stable from the previous survey
(L. Pironi)
Druet
DF
irr.
2002
withdrawal of the terminus, net decrement (M. Butti,R. Scotti)
Fascere
DF
irr.
2002
some seasonal snow patches, fully covered by debris, strong
loss of mass (M. Butti, R. Scotti)
Pioda Inf.
DM
2500
2500
2002
full snow cover, overall loss of mass (M. Butti, R. Scotti)
Pioda Sup.
DM
2585
2585
2002
full snow cover, overall loss of mass (M. Butti, R. Scotti)
Pizzo Brunone
DF
2510
2510
2001
buried ice plate headed to extinction, covered by annual snow
(M. Merati)
Bocchetta di Podavitt
DM
2345
2345
2001
almost stable surface but net mass decrement (R. Bianchi,
G.M. Lucini)
Podavista
S
2130
2120
1999
very extensive snow cover, substantially unchanged (R. Bianchi, G.M. Lucini)
M. Costone
E
irr.
2001
no ice left, reclassiied as “minor glacial formation” (M. Zambenedetti)
Recastello
DM
n.v.
2001
signiicant loss of mass since the last survey (S. D’Adda, F.
Mocci)
Abbreviations: N.M.: Not measured; n.v.: Not evaluated; ass: Absent; irr.: Irregular
- 33 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
2002
Lavedole
The terminus variations The sample glaciers of Italian Glaciological Committee (CGI)
Some glaciers subject to a complete survey have their linear terminus variations measured.
The algebraic symbol indicates a downvalley advance (+) or an upvalley withdrawal (-). The
variation is not directly linked to the snow-meteorological trend of the season. Many are the
additional factors (such as: glacier response time, bedrock morphology, lux velocity, etc…)
that make this parameter of little use in evaluating the state of the glacier in the survey year.
However these glaciers carry an historical series of linear front measurements, which makes
their continuous monitoring extremely interesting. Our glaciers, along with other Italian glaciers, are part of the historical sample of ice bodies surveyed by CGI. The sample is divided into two sets. Groups 1 and 2, selected on the basis of their glaciological importance and
representativeness, include the glaciers measured once a year; group 3 include the glaciers
measured on a rotational basis, generally once every 5 years. In the present phase of signiicant and prolonged decrements, the front measurements are coherent with the dynamic
index: out of the 26 glaciers with annual measurement, only 1 has held its previous position; all the others have shown sometimes consistent shrinkages. The Passo di Chiareggio
and Verva Maggiore Glaciers multi-year decrements were paroxysmal and caused by the
dismemberments of dead-ice blocks, a typical feature of an intense withdrawal phase.
2008 glaciological
Survey
Tab. 8: Summary of terminus measurement data, versus 2007 and previous years.
Variations versus 2007
decrements
increments
unchanged
26
25 (96,2 %)
0
1 (3,8 %)
Variations versus previous years
decrements
increments
unchanged
3
3 (100 %)
0
0
Fig. 7: The terminus variations of the Lombardy’s sample glaciers over the last 18 years.
- 34 -
Tab. 9: The front variations of the sample glaciers since 1990: the dynamic phase is expressed by the
algebraic sign.
Year
Number
of measured
glaciers
1990
1991
Withdrawing glaciers
Stable glaciers
Advancing glacier
%
number
%
number
%
40
35
87,5
2
5,0
3
7,5
26
23
88,5
2
7,7
1
3,8
1992
35
33
94,4
1
2,8
1
2,8
1993
36
32
88,8
2
5,6
2
5,6
1994
47
39
83,0
5
10,6
3
6,4
1995
44
38
86,4
4
9,1
2
4,5
1996
52
48
92,3
1
1,9
3
5,8
1997
55
37
67,3
1
1,8
17
30,9
1998
61
53
86,9
2
3,3
6
9,8
1999
57
47
82,5
6
10,5
4
7,0
2000
57
53
93,0
2
3,5
2
3,5
2001
24
14
58,3
2
8,4
8
33,3
2002
53
42
79,2
0
0
11
20,8
2003
62
56
90,4
3
4,8
3
4,8
2004
49
42
85,7
1
2,1
6
12,2
2005
57
53
93,0
3
5,3
1
1,7
2006
33
32
97
1
3
0
0
2007
30
29
96,7
0
0
1
3,3
2008
28
27
96,4
1
3,6
0
0
Tab. 10: The synthetic indexes used in order to deine the annual dynamic phase of Lombardy glaciers.
Dynamic index
Description
S (Stable)
meaningful morphologic variation versus the previous survey. Extensive snow cover.
IL (Slight increment)
snow cover over most of the glacier: slight increment of irn versus the previous year.
IM (Moderate increment)
snow cover over the whole glacier; terminus shows some advancement.
IF (Strong increment)
snow cover over the whole glacier and surrounding areas; signiicant snout advancement.
DL (Slight decrement)
Scarce snow cover, slight terminus retreat; or stable front but slightly reduced thickness.
DM (Moderate decrement)
Very scarce or absent snow cover, veriied terminus retreat; thickness and area reduction.
DF (Strong decrement)
No snow cover, strong terminus retreat, or stable front but reduction of both thickness
and area.
I (Uncertain)
the dynamic phase is doubtful (uncertain data, debris cover and so on…)
E (Extinct) / EC (Extinct
conirmation)
Extinct during the current year / already extinct in the previous years
- 35 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
number
MOST SIGNIFICANT PICTURES
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Pizzo Ferrè Glacier in the Spluga Sector (August 24, 2008, E. Congiu).
The Nord-East Sivigia Glacier, Codera-Masino Sector, taken on September 20, 2008 by A.
Barilli.
- 36 -
The two Fellaria Glaciers (Bernina) from Cima Fontana (September 9, 2008). Note the size of
the proglacial lake of the East Fellaria Glacier (foreground) responsible, through the associated
calving processes, for the sustained melting of the tongue (photo by M. Butti).
2008 glaciological
Survey
This large-scale photo, taken by G. Cola on August 31, 2008, shows the greater part of the
Forni Glacier basin in Upper Valtellina. The picture outlines the scarce, annual and multiannual,
residual snow accumulations.
- 37 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
The,Sissone Glacier in the Disgrazia Sector (August 30, 2008, photo by A. Almasio).
The Pizzo Scalino Glacier, without residual snow cover (September 10, 2008, photo by M.
Butti).
- 38 -
The East Val Viola Glacier, in upper Val Viola Bormina, Dosdè-Piazzi Sector (August 10, 2008,
photo by R. Scotti).
- 39 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Dosdè Centrale Glacier in Val Viola Bormina (September 1, 2008, photo by F. Galluccio)
2008 glaciological
Survey
The West Val Viola Glacier in a photo taken on August 31, 2008 (photo by S. Ratti) and in a 20year old picture (photo below). Note the great loss of mass (photo by M. Lojacono, 1985).
- 40 -
- 41 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
The East Dosdè Glacier (Dosdè-Piazzi Sector) on September 1, 2008 (above, photo by F. Galluccio) and in 1985 (below, photo by A. Galluccio). The terminus has withdrawn more than 200
m in 20 years.
2008 glaciological
Survey
A 20-year interval separates these two photos of
the Campo Nord Glacier
in the Livigno Sector. Both
the loss of mass and the
strong reduction of the
ice-walls are quite evident.
The crevasses at the terminus are almost gone,
while the debris cover has
increased. The grooves
cut into the ice by melting
processes are visible, with
2 deep bédières on the
surface (above, photo by
R. Scotti, August 3, 2008;
below, by A. Galluccio,
1988).
- 42 -
In the Livigno Sector many glaciers have suffered signiicant withdrawal over the last decades.
The South Vago Glacier in a picture taken by R. Scotti on August 3, 2008 (above) and (below) by
A. Galluccio in 1988. Comparing the 2 images, one can notice the substantial dismemberment
and the extinction of the apparatus.
2008 glaciological
Survey
- 43 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Vitelli Glacier (Ortles-Cevedale) from Punta Radisca, on August 29, 2008. The accumulation basin was still covered by the annual snow (photo by P. Pagliardi).
The Dosegù Glacier (Ortles-Cevedale) on August 21, 2008 (photo by A. Borghi).
- 44 -
The terminus of the Forni Glacier (Ortles-Cevedale) on August 8, 2008 (photo by G. Cola).
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Gran Zebrù Glacier (Ortles-Cevedale) almost devoid of its snow cover. (August 30, 2008,
photo by C. Scolari).
- 45 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Pian di Neve (Adamello) in a photo taken at the beginning of August, 2008 from Passo di
Salarno. The snow cover was so thin that the ice was emerging (photo by P. Cinanni).
- 46 -
The Vederetta del Venerocolo Glacier (Adamello) on August 30, 2008 (photo by A. Toffaletti);
excluding the avalanche accumulations at the foot of the fans of the northern Adamello wall, the
snow is very scarce. In the box: the break-up of the ice channel that, until last year, was linking
the Vedretta dei Frati and the Vedretta del Venerocolo Glaciers.
2008 glaciological
Survey
- 47 -
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Vedretta dell’Avio Centrale Glacier (Adamello Group) was showing some snow cover over
about 30% of its surface and a continuously thinning terminus (August 29, 2008, photo by P.
Cinanni).
The Vedretta di Pisgana Ovest (Adamello) in a detail of its median part. The link between the
front portion (foreground) and the accumulation basins is getting narrower (September 9, 2008;
photo by F. Roveda).
- 48 -
The Lupo Glacier (Orobic Alps) in a picture taken on August 30, 2008 by S. D’Adda.
2008 glaciological
Survey
The Monte Torena Superiore Glacier (Orobic Alps) fully covered by snow on August 24, 2008
(photo by L. Pironi).
- 49 -