PR
OO
F2
INFORMATION SCIENCE
PR
OO
F2
INFORMATION SCIENCE
OO
F2
Critical Concepts in
Media and Cultural Studies
Edited by
David Nicholas and Eti Herman
PR
Volume II
Managing Information for Optimum
Accessibility and Usability
First published 2014
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Editorial material and selection © 2014 David Nicholas and Eti Herman; individual owners
retain copyright in their own material
OO
F2
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form
or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks,
and are used only for identiication and explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
ISBN 978-0-415-68299-2 (set) -- ISBN 978-0-415-68300-5 (volume 1) -- ISBN 978-0-41568301-2 (volume 2) -- ISBN 978-0-415-68302-9 (volume 3) -- ISBN 978-0-415-68303-6 (volume
4) 1. Information science. 2. Information services. 3. Electronic information resources. 4.
Information technology. 5. Information behavior. 6. Information society. 7. Knowledge
economy. I. Nicholas, David, 1947- II. Herman, Eti.
Z665.I58255 2014
020--dc23
2013048579
ISBN: 978-0-415-68299-2 (set)
ISBN: 978-0-415-68301-2 (Volume II)
Typeset in Times New Roman MT by
Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire
PR
Publisher’s Note
References within each chapter are as they appear in the original complete work
CONTENTS
OO
F2
VOLUME II: MANAGING INFORMATION FOR OPTIMUM
ACCESSIBILITY AND USABILITY
Acknowledgements
ix
Introduction to Volume II
1
PART 4
The generation of new information
9
4.1 The scholarly quest for new contributions to the extant body of
knowledge
11
17
11
Who does research and with what results?
A. J. MEADOWS
18
Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and
a research agenda
46
PR
LAURENS K. HESSELS AND HARRO VAN LENTE
PART 5
The capturing and control of information
83
5.1 The selection and acquisition of recorded knowledge
85
19
The roles of collections and the scope of collection
development
85
MICHAEL K. BUCKLAND
20
The changing nature of collection management in research
libraries
JOSEPH BRANIN, FRANCES GROEN, AND SUZANNE THORIN
v
100
Contents
5.2 The processing and organization of recorded knowledge
119
21
119
Knowledge organization systems: an overview
GAIL HODGE
22
Structure and function in retrieval
127
ALAN GILCHRIST
23
Cataloguing in an electronic age
137
MICHAEL GORMAN
148
OO
F2
5.3 The architecting of recorded knowledge in a digital environment
24
Information interaction: providing a framework for
information architecture
148
ELAINE G. TOMS
PART 6
The dissemination and efective intermediation of information
165
6.1 The difusion of information in the digital era
167
25
167
Whither libraries? or, Wither libraries
F. WILFRID LANCASTER
26
Aftermath of a prediction: F. W. Lancaster and the paperless
society
186
ARTHUR P. YOUNG
27
The role of social networks in information difusion
202
PR
EYTAN BAKSHY, ITAMAR ROSENN, CAMERON MARLOW AND
LADA ADAMIC
6.2 The changing practices of scholarly information dissemination
222
28
222
Scientiic communication: new roles and new players
JULIE M. HURD
29
Scholarly communication in the digital environment: the 2005
survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes
IAN ROWLANDS AND DAVID NICHOLAS
vi
237
Contents
6.3 Information brokering
257
30
257
Agents and angels
JOHN SEELY BROWN AND PAUL DUGUID
6.4 People as information sources: interpersonal information sharing
31
Information seeking in social context: structural inluences
and receipt of information beneits
278
278
ROB CROSS, RONALD E. RICE, AND ANDREW PARKER
302
OO
F2
6.5 Information sharing in the age of social media
32
Social media use in the research worklow
302
IAN ROWLANDS, DAVID NICHOLAS, BILL RUSSELL,
NICHOLAS CANTY AND ANTHONY WATKINSON
33
Classifying ecommerce information sharing behaviour by
youths on social networking sites
323
BERNARD J. JANSEN, KATE SOBEL AND GEOFF COOK
6.6 Scientiic data sharing
351
34
351
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions
CAROL TENOPIR, SUZIE ALLARD, KIMBERLY DOUGLASS,
ARSEV UMUR AYDINOGLU, LEI WU, ELEANOR READ,
MARIBETH MANOFF AND MIKE FRAME
403
35
403
PR
6.7 The role of the information professional as information
intermediator
The mission of the librarian
JOSÉ ORTEGA Y GASSET
36
Ortega revisited
420
LESTER ASHEIM
37
The information enfranchisement of the digital consumer
ETI HERMAN AND DAVID NICHOLAS
vii
431
Contents
6.8 Libraries in today’s digital world
449
38
449
Designing libraries round human beings
MAURICE B. LINE
39
Ranganathan’s relevance in the 21st century
462
DAVID MCMENEMY
40
What is Library 2.0?
468
KIM HOLMBERG, ISTO HUVILA, MARIA KRONQVIST- BERG AND
GUNILLA WIDÉN- WULFF
484
OO
F2
6.9 The curation and preservation of information
41
Digital preservation, archival science and methodological
foundations for digital libraries
484
SEAMUS ROSS
Decision criteria in digital preservation: what to measure and
how
CHRISTOPH BECKER AND ANDREAS RAUBER
PR
42
viii
509
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
OO
F2
The publishers would like to thank the following for permission to reprint
their material:
Elsevier for permission to reprint A. J. Meadows, ‘Who Does Research and
with What Results?’, Communicating Research (New York: Academic Press,
1998), pp. 79–114.
Elsevier for permission to reprint L. K. Hessels and H. van Lente, ‘Re-thinking
New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda’,
Research Policy, 2008, 37, 4, 740–60.
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint M. K. Buckland, ‘The
Roles of Collections and the Scope of Collection Development’, Journal of
Documentation, 1989, 45, 3, 213–26.
PR
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint A. Gilchrist,
‘Structure and Function in Retrieval’, Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62,
1, 21–9.
Taylor & Francis for permission to reprint M. Gorman, ‘Cataloguing in an
Electronic Age’, Cataloging & Classiication Quarterly, 2003, 36, 3/4, 5–17.
John Wiley & Sons for permission to reprint Elaine G. Toms, ‘Information
Interaction: Providing a Framework for Information Architecture’, Journal
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53, 10,
855–62.
The Johns Hopkins University Press for permission to reprint A. P. Young,
‘Aftermath of a Prediction: F. W. Lancaster and the Paperless Society’, Library
Trends, 2008, 56, 4, 843–58.
ix
AC k n ow l e d g e m e n t s
Taylor & Francis for permission to reprint J. M. Hurd, ‘Scientiic
Communication: New Roles and New Players’, Science & Technology
Libraries, 2004, 25, 1–2, 5–22.
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint I. Rowlands and
D. Nicholas, ‘Scholarly Communication in the Digital Environment: The
2005 Survey of Journal Author Behaviour and Attitudes’, Aslib Proceedings,
2005, 57, 6, 481–97.
OO
F2
Harvard Business Publishing for permission to reprint J. S. Brown and
P. Duguid, ‘Agents and Angels’, The Social Life of Information (Boston,
Mass.: Harvard Business Press, 2002), pp. 35–62.
IEEE Publishing for permission to reprint R. Cross, R. E. Rice and A. Parker,
‘Information Seeking in Social Context: Structural Inluences and Receipt of
Information Beneits’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and, Cybernetics
– Part C – Applications and Reviews, 2001, 31, 4, 438–48.
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint I. Rowlands, D. Nicholas,
B. Russell, N. Canty and A. Watkinson, ‘Social Media Use in the Research
Worklow’, Learned Publishing, 2011, 24, 3, 183–95.
Sage Publications for permission to reprint B. J. Jansen, K. Sobel and
G. Cook, ‘Classifying Ecommerce Information Sharing Behaviour by Youths
on Social Networking Sites’, Journal of Information Science, 2011, 37, 2,
120–36.
PR
The Antioch Review for permission to reprint J. Ortega y Gasset, J. Lewis and
R. Carpenter, ‘The Mission of the Librarian’, The Antioch Review, 1961, 21,
2, 133–54. Copyright ©1961 by the Antioch Review, Inc.
The University of Chicago for permission to reprint L. Asheim, ‘Ortega
Revisited’, The Library Quarterly, 1982, 52, 3, 215–26.
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint E. Herman and
D. Nicholas, ‘The Information Enfranchisement of the Digital Consumer’,
Aslib Proceedings, 2010, 62, 3, 245–60.
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint M. B. Line, ‘Designing
Libraries Round Human Beings’, Aslib Proceedings, 1998, 50, 8, 221–9.
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint D. McMenemy,
‘Ranganathan’s Relevance in the 21st Century’, Library Review, 2007, 56, 2,
97–101.
x
Contents
Emerald Group Publishing for permission to reprint K. Holmberg, I. Huvila,
M. Kronqvist-Berg and G. Widén-Wulf, ‘What is Library 2.0?’, Journal of
Documentation, 2009, 65, 4, 668–81.
Taylor & Francis for permission to reprint S. Ross, ‘Digital Preservation,
Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries’,
New Review of Information Networking, 2012, 17, 1, 43–68.
OO
F2
John Wiley & Sons for permission to reprint C. Becker and A. Rauber,
‘Decision Criteria in Digital Preservation: What to Measure and How’,
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
2011, 62, 6, 1009–28.
Disclaimer
PR
The publishers have made every efort to contact authors/copyright holders
of works reprinted in Information Science: Critical Concepts in Media and
Cultural Studies. This has not been possible in every case, however, and we
would welcome correspondence from those individuals/companies whom we
have been unable to trace.
xi
PR
OO
F2
INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME II
OO
F2
Volume II assembles the essential thinking on the management of information for its optimum accessibility and usability. It thus encompasses the
entire chain of information, the process through which recorded knowledge is
transmitted from its originator to the consumer: the generation, organisation,
processing, architecture, publishing and dissemination, intermediation and
curation of information throughout its life cycle. Looking therefore at the
theoretical foundations and practical strategies of ensuring that information
provision achieves its proclaimed goal of furnishing individuals with accurate,
timely and complete information tailored to their distinctive needs, this section delineates the whole information process whilst focusing on its principal
functions and agencies.
Part 4: The generation of new information
PR
The central role accorded to knowledge in all spheres of contemporary social
and economic life, as a result of which information has become a commodity
of major value, undoubtedly renders the generation of new information more
important than ever. However, if traditionally the scholarly quest for fresh
contributions to the existing state of knowledge was seen as an end in itself,
by now the justiication of the research enterprise has become the production
of ‘knowledge for use’ instead of ‘knowledge for its own sake’. The two papers
comprising Part 4 look at these comparatively new developments, juxtaposing
the scholarly pursuits of yore with those of today’s greatly changed research
atmosphere.
Presenting the traditional view of the scholarly producers and propagators
of information, A. J. Meadows sets out to examine the psychological and
sociological factors motivating people to embark on a scientiic career and the
prerequisites for academic success (Chapter 17). Along the way, he explores
some of the more central features of the scholarly undertaking: productivity,
its measurement and its variation by age; quality as relected by citations;
membership in the research community, communication and collaboration.
Next, introducing a distinction between the traditional and the new scientiic
1
I n t ro d u C t I o n t o V o lu m e I I
practices, which go under the terms ‘Mode 1’ and ‘Mode 2’, respectively,
Laurens K. Hessels and Harro van Lente critically review the considerable
body of literature that has accumulated on the subject (Chapter 18). The new
mode of knowledge production, whilst decidedly diferent from the traditional one, irst and foremost inasmuch as it is no longer located primarily in
scientiic institutions and structured by scientiic disciplines, nevertheless by
no means displaces its predecessor. Rather, as it emerges next to the age-old
scholarly ways, the possibility of future shifts in the balance of Mode 1 and
Mode 2 over time seems to be indicated.
Part 5: The capturing and control of information
PR
OO
F2
In our increasingly information-dependent world, advancing human knowledge is more than ever an undertaking of vital importance and a major driver
of societal and cultural development. Fortunately, potential contributors to
the universal information base, needing to stand, as they do, ‘on the shoulders
of the giants who preceded them’, so that they can further examine, analyse,
experiment with and modify human knowledge, surely have an easier time of
it in today’s internet-based, information-rich environment. Easier, certainly,
and efectual, too, provided it is via the better controlled and organised fashion of access to information aforded by libraries, although, lamentably, this
is not invariably how present-day scholarly information seekers, be they professional or amateur, go about it. The papers in this part thus look at the traditional measures of organisation and processing of information undertaken
by libraries for the beneit of their readers.
Michael K. Buckland introduces the subject (Chapter 19) by exploring the
scope and purposes of library collection development, which he deines as
the assembling of materials in anticipation of their use. Situating the selection and acquisition component of the professional eforts aimed at ensuring
access to knowledge in its historical context, he yields insights into the problems that were involved in the undertaking at a time when collections centred
on physical media and, as a result, space for their storage was an overriding
consideration. Joseph Branin, Frances Groen and Suzanne Thorin (Chapter
20) broaden the canvas by tracking the evolution of the approach to the
capturing of information to serve the needs of library patrons, via the terms
referring to it, from ‘collection development’ to ‘collection management’ and
inally, to ‘knowledge management’. As their review patently indicates, life
in an internet-based digital world, where access to information rather than
its ownership is the norm, expands enormously the range of policy-making,
selection, planning and budgeting involved in the attempts to ensure that
information seekers’ needs are adequately met by the library.
Very much in the same vein, the literature testiies to far-reaching changes
in libraries’ traditional information processing and organisation roles, too.
Hardly surprisingly, of course, for, as Gail Hodge points out in her overview
2
I n t ro d u C t I o n t o V o lu m e I I
OO
F2
of knowledge organisation systems, presented next (Chapter 21), these days
librarians are increasingly called upon to pay special attention to electronic
information, whether created or held locally or accessed in a distributed fashion, and to organise it into digital libraries, too. This, as Elaine G. Toms
explains in the paper on the architecting of information, which concludes
this part (Chapter 24), necessitates a diferent, more visual approach to the
organisation of content, for today the interaction with information is not
only query-driven, but, courtesy of the web, also expected to be an ‘experience’. Fortunately, librarians have at their disposal a host of technologyenabled, rapidly evolving opportunities for creating, capturing and organising
information.
It is important to note, however, as Alan Gilchrist contends in his paper
(Chapter 22), that the core traditional ideas of Information Science are
just as relevant now as they were before. Indeed so, and it is nowhere more
apparent than in the case of cataloguing, which has as its express goal the
safekeeping of the four vital attributes of any well-regulated information
base: organisation, retrievability, authenticity and stability. This, as Michael
Gorman puts forward in the paper to follow (Chapter 23), at a time when we
are faced with what looks like an impossible task: bringing order to the chaos
of the internet and the web. Nevertheless, he suggests, if we remain cognisant
of the lessons of history and apply the well-tested and proven principles of
bibliographic control to what he dubs ‘the electronic swamp confronting us’,
we can do it.
Part 6: The dissemination and efective intermediation of
information
PR
The successful completion of people’s undertakings across various situations
and contexts hinges to a great extent on the possibilities for interactive communication among similarly interested individuals and/or on access to the
past knowledge accumulated on a topic. Indeed, people continually acquire
ideas and data either from other people or from the vast variety of information sources available in print-on-paper or digital form, evaluate the validity and worth of these ideas and data, utilise some and even disseminate
the results, if and where relevant, to their family, friends and community in
general.
This is particularly true where scholars are concerned, for the scholarly
enterprise is and always has been based on communication. Indeed, researchers’ ability to contribute to the advancement of human knowledge is contingent upon their continuous dialogue with their colleagues. However, with
all that peer-to-peer communication is indeed the absolute prerequisite of
making scientiic progress, so is access to previous indings: researchers, aspiring to alter the existing state of knowledge by a new contribution, link together
individual pieces of scholarly work; this, by situating their own work in the
3
I n t ro d u C t I o n t o V o lu m e I I
PR
OO
F2
extant knowledge body, and submitting it to further debate and criticism in
subsequent publications.
With communication thus indubitably forming an essential part of the way
we live and make progress in our understanding of the world around us, our
times are certainly the best of times for our purposes, as the easy availability
and efortless accessibility of the host of resources, channels and facilities
enable the transferring of information from one individual to the other(s) in
a matter of seconds. The next part takes a closer look at the developments in
this area in our contemporary digital realities: current practices of information difusion, in general, and in the scholarly arena, in particular, as well
as information brokering and information sharing. Towards the concluding
sections the focus will shift to the principal agents concerned with facilitating the communication of information, librarians and libraries, with the last
few papers concentrating on their greatly changed roles in the curation and
preservation of information.
Opening with F. W. Lancaster’s more than a third of a century old, groundbreaking vision of an information-driven, paperless society (Chapter 25),
which by now has certainly proven to be nothing less than prophetic, the
question of the library’s future survival as a prime enabler of information
mediation is immediately brought to the fore. As Arthur P. Young notes in
his comprehensive review of Lancaster’s prediction and its (not invariably
favourable) reception by the profession, presented next (Chapter 26), the
library is seen in a deep decline, if not ordained for almost certain disappearance, but librarians may survive, indeed thrive, if they reconigure their missions and service orientations. We will take up this point again further on, but
irst the next, research-based paper considers the topic of our interest here,
the difusion of information in the digital era, as it is facilitated by the relatively recent mass adoption of social networks. Looking at the informationsharing behaviour observable on Facebook, Eytan Bakshy and his colleagues
(Chapter 27) identify aggregate trends in the role played by social inluence in
the dissemination of information.
The next two papers move on to focus on the changing practices of information dissemination in the scholarly arena. First, Julie M. Hurd charts
the migration of the scientiic communication system from print to digital
media (Chapter 28). Ofering an updated model of the traditional system,
which, capturing as it does a moving target, in point of fact does not necessarily relect a inalised situation, she examines its transformed processes as
well as the altered roles and interactions of its main players, the scientistsauthors, publishers and librarians. Then Ian Rowlands and David Nicholas
ofer a research-led exploration into the potential of open access publishing
and institutional repositories to reform the scholarly communication system
(Chapter 29). Having established that researchers are still a long way of from
reaching a consensus on the likelihood of such developments taking place,
with attitudes and opinions varying mainly by disciplinary culture but also by
4
I n t ro d u C t I o n t o V o lu m e I I
PR
OO
F2
regional location, the authors warn against ‘one-size-its-all’ policy-making
approaches to the problem.
Reverting yet again to the present-day, ubiquitous virtual information environment, the next paper, by John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid, a chapter
from their widely acclaimed book The Social Life of Information (Chapter 30),
looks at one of the fast-evolving trends characterising present-day practices
of information dissemination and mediation, the utilisation of autonomous
agents, known as bots, for the purpose. These software programs, which incessantly roam the internet to catalogue its content, act as efective enough, if far
from perfect, information brokers, helping as they do today’s informationhungry digital consumers to ‘ind needles of information in the web’s vast
haystack’ (p. 37), to use the authors’ apt turn of phrase.
Untangling the literature on the topic of information sharing in a digital
world, a topic that has attracted quite some attention in the past few years, the
next four papers examine the diferent aspects of information partnerships
among people. To start with, Cross and his colleagues, in their study of people
as information sources in a social and organisational context (Chapter 31),
identify the informational beneits that people receive from other people and
the characteristics of relationships that dictate to whom they turn for these
beneits. Then the role of the ever-more popular social media as a platform for
information sharing is considered.
In a paper reporting on a major international survey among scholars
(Chapter 32), David Nicholas, Ian Rowlands, and other members of the
UK-based CIBER research group show that social media have found serious
application in academe, too. Indeed, although traditional venues of disseminating research remain most valued, social media, too, are seen as important,
at least as complementary channels, at all points of the research life cycle,
from identifying research opportunities to disseminating indings at the end.
Targeting another critical group of social media users, teenagers and young
adults, in order to investigate their e-commerce information-sharing behaviours, Jansen and his colleagues note the varied levels of their soliciting information from social networking sites, as well as the varied levels of their acting
on the information they obtain (Chapter 33). Finally, Carol Tenopir and her
colleagues (Chapter 34) look at a more speciic aspect of information sharing,
that of scientiic data, inding that with all the importance accorded to the
practice, allowing as it does for veriication of research results and for basing
on it additional research, the extent of data sharing is quite low; this, for a
variety of reasons to do with logistics, but, just as much, with disciplinary and
work culture-rooted and age-related practices.
The next obvious step in exploring the dissemination component of the
transmission of knowledge from its originator to its consumer is the look the
next few papers proceed to take at the traditional intermediating agents facilitating the process, the information professionals and their libraries. Serving
as the basis for understanding the mission of the information professional,
5
I n t ro d u C t I o n t o V o lu m e I I
PR
OO
F2
Ortega y Gasset’s classic paper on the subject deines what a librarian must
do in order to be a good librarian (Chapter 35). As the history of librarianship clearly shows, he contends, it is the signiicance of information in a given
society that determines the librarian’s call, which is why, in the informationsaturated realities of the twentieth century, the librarian should go far beyond
the mere administration of books to fulil the role of a ilter interposed
between man and the torrent of books. Lester Asheim, in his insightful paper
presented next (Chapter 36), takes Ortega y Gasset’s argument further by
proposing that, as a logical extension and enhancement of the librarian’s
‘ilter’ role, the information professional should serve as an intermediator,
whose mission is scanning, processing and selecting from the total domain of
information that part of it which meets an individual’s needs.
Thinking much along the same lines, Eti Herman and David Nicholas reexamine the mission of the information professional at a time when the torrent of information has long been exacerbated into an avalanche (Chapter
37). Noting that the truly vast amounts of information at people’s beck
and call hardly present any problems, but their inefectual information consumption deinitely does, for, as a result, their myriad pressing information
needs go unmet, they call upon information professionals to ensure that
people’s information needs are handled efectively. This, directly, via the proicient planning and delivery of information provision, but also indirectly,
by spreading professional thinking and practices to those who insist on
sorting out their information needs on their own. Information professionals
need, therefore, to reairm their professional vows with their customers: to
connect and reach out in an era of disintermediation, disconnection and
decoupling.
Moving forward to examine how libraries are shaping up to fulil their mission in an era that sees profound upheavals in the information environment,
Maurice B. Line ofers an especially perceptive appraisal of the transition
libraries should and, courtesy of the novel technologies, can now make from
take-it-or-leave-it, bulk services to the masses to tailor-made, needs-driven
services (Chapter 38). After all, as he argues, it is better, not to say simpler, to
design libraries around people rather than to redesign people to it libraries.
Better, indeed, as well as very much in keeping with traditional library values,
as the brief paper presented next (Chapter 39), in which David McMenemy
discusses the ongoing relevance of Ranganathan’s teaching for librarians of
the modern era, clearly demonstrates. Finally, in the paper concluding this
section (Chapter 40), Kim Holmberg and his colleagues look at the state of
the art concept of the library, ‘Library 2.0’. Identifying the seven building
blocks of the phenomenon – interactivity, users, participation, libraries and
library services, web and web 2.0, social aspects, and technology and tools –
the authors deine Library 2.0 as the quintessence of a changed user–library
interaction, made possible by the social aspects of today’s user-friendly, webbased services.
6
I n t ro d u C t I o n t o V o lu m e I I
PR
OO
F2
In conclusion of this part we now turn to the vital need for ensuring the
long-term viability and accessibility of information, as an obvious prerequisite of its communicability. Thus, the next two papers look at the curation and
preservation of information in our digital era. First, Seamus Ross (Chapter
41) discusses the multifold theoretical, methodological and technological challenges of maintaining the semantic meaning of the digital object, its content
and its provenance and authenticity, whilst also retaining its interrelatedness
and the context of its creation and use. Then, Christoph Becker and Andreas
Rauber consider the possible ways and means of addressing these challenges,
delineating the decision criteria and inluence factors to be considered when
choosing digital preservation solutions (Chapter 42).
7
PR
OO
F2