YAMBERGIO PARTICULADO

Being Zen and Doing Zen has confused many people but this essay seeks to reconcile the two

Redes sociales aplicadas en la educación

www.e1litur0trei.ro

isara solutions, 2015

Background: The purpose of the study was to compare will to win as a psychological differential to play and triumph among male runners, jumpers and throwers. Method: For the purpose of the study, 60 male athletes (15 Short Distance Runners, 15 Long Distance Runners, 15 Jumpers & 15 throwers) were randomly selected from 10 th National Junior Federation Cup Athletic Championship 2010 held at Visakhapatnam as the subjects of the study. The variable selected for the purpose of this study was: Will to win. Will to win was assessed by the total scores in Will to Win Questionnaire constructed and standardized by Prof. Anand Kumar Shrivastava & Prem Shankar Shukla. With the help of the questionnaire related to will to win as a psychological variable necessary data were collected. Data were collected with regard to will to win variable from 60 male athletes in 10 th National Junior Federation Cup Athletic Championship 2010 held at Visakhapatnam. The data was analyzed by applying Descriptive Statistic i.e. Mean, Standard Deviation, Range & Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: The findings of the study in relation to will to win showed significant difference among long distance runners, short distance runners, jumpers and throwers. Conclusions: On the basis of the findings of the study, the following conclusions are drawn: Long distance runner possessed high will to win in comparison to short distance runners, jumpers and throwers. Jumpers possessed low will to win in comparison to long distance runner, short distance runners and throwers. The sequence of will to win among athletes was long distance runners, throwers, short distance runners and jumpers.

Tyranny of Delusion: Science as a Flat-Earth Society, 2024

The first chapter of a book examining authoritarianism and misinformation in academia. Are we ready to acknowledge that academic communities work like other social systems? Delusion propels linguistic theories to justify linguists' illusory superiority.

Folklore, 2019

Max Planck’s discovery that energy existed not as a continuous flow of energy as had been previously held to be the case but as tiny discrete packets of energy that he termed quanta, was probably the most striking discovery made by man after his discovery of fire. Nothing else comes near to it in the way in which it has expanded human horizons. Yet in spite of the omnipotent place it holds in physics it is possible that Max Planck’s discovery is one of the most misunderstood and misinterpreted theories in the history of science. This paper re-examines Planck’s monumental discovery and questions whether the present interpretation of his theory is right or wrong.