Aspirin

Cardiovascular Drugs Aspirin Eric H. Awtry, MD; Joseph Loscalzo, MD, PhD S alicylates, in the form of willow bark, were used as an analgesic during the time of Hippocrates, and their antipyretic effects have been recognized for more than 200 years.1 Acetylsalicylic acid, or aspirin, was introduced in the late 1890s2 and has been used to treat a variety of inflammatory conditions; however, the antiplatelet activity of this agent was not recognized until almost 70 years later.3 Recent advances in our understanding of the central role of platelets in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease have spurred in-depth investigations into the mechanisms of action of aspirin and the clinical utility of this agent in the treatment of common cardiovascular disorders. Mechanism of Action Aspirin exerts its effect primarily by interfering with the biosynthesis of cyclic prostanoids, ie, thromboxane A2 (TXA2), prostacyclin, and other prostaglandins. These prostanoids are generated by the enzymatically catalyzed oxidation of arachidonic acid, which is itself derived from membrane phospholipids4 (Figure). Arachidonic acid is metabolized by the enzyme prostaglandin (PG) H-synthase, which, through its cyclooxygenase (COX) and peroxidase activities, results in the production of PGG2 and PGH2, respectively. PGH2 is then modified by specific synthases, thus producing prostaglandins D2, E2, F2a, I2 (prostacyclin), and TXA2, all of which mediate specific cellular functions. PGH-synthase, also referred to as COX, exists in 2 isoforms that have significant homology of their amino acid sequences.5 A single amino acid substitution in the catalytic site of the enzyme confers selectivity to inhibitors of the COX isoforms.6,7 The first isoform (COX-1) is constitutively expressed in the endoplasmic reticulum of most cells (including platelets)8 and results in the synthesis of homeostatic prostaglandins responsible for normal cellular functions, including gastric mucosal protection, maintenance of renal blood flow, and regulation of platelet activation and aggregation.4 The second isoform (COX-2) is not routinely present in most mammalian cells but, rather, is rapidly inducible by inflammatory stimuli and growth factors and results in the production of prostaglandins that contribute to the inflammatory response.9,10 Aspirin imparts its primary antithrombotic effects through the inhibition of PGH-synthase/COX by the irreversible acetylation of a specific serine moiety (serine 530 of COX-1 and serine 516 of COX-2)11,12 and is '170-fold more potent in inhibiting COX-1 than COX-2.13 In the presence of aspirin, COX-1 is completely inactivated, whereas COX-2 converts arachidonic acid not to PGH2, but to 15-R-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15-R-HETE).14 The end result is that neither affected isoform is capable of converting arachidonic acid to PGH2, a necessary step in the production of prostanoids. The resultant decreased production of prostaglandins and TXA2 likely accounts for the therapeutic effects, as well as the toxicities, of aspirin. From a cardiovascular standpoint, it is principally the antithrombotic effect of aspirin that results in its clinical utility. Platelet production of TXA2 in response to a variety of stimuli (including collagen, thrombin, and ADP) results in the amplification of the platelet aggregation response and in vasoconstriction.15,16 Conversely, vascular endothelial cell production of prostacyclin results in inhibition of platelet aggregation and induces vasodilation. Aspirininduced inhibition of TXA2 and PGI2 has opposing effects on hemostasis; however, the available data suggest that the potentially prothrombotic effects of PGI2 inhibition are not clinically relevant and that the antithrombotic effects of TXA2 inhibition predominate.17 This may, in part, be a result of the ability of vascular endothelial cells to regenerate new COX and thus recover normal function,18 whereas COX inhibition in platelets is irreversible owing to the limited mRNA pool and protein synthesis in these anuclear cells. Other mechanisms for platelet inhibition by aspirin have been proposed. For example, aspirin facilitates the inhibition of platelet activation by neutrophils, an effect that appears to be mediated by a nitric oxide (NO)/cGMP-dependent process,19 and inhibition of prostacyclin synthesis in endothelial cells enhances NO production.20 In addition to its antithrombotic effects, other mechanisms may contribute to the clinical benefits of aspirin in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Aspirin may help to decrease the progression of atherosclerosis by protecting LDL from oxidative modification21 and also improves endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerotic vessels.22 Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain these benefits, all of which center on the potential role of aspirin as an antioxidant. Salicylate has been shown to be an inhibitor of the cytokine-dependent induction of NOS-II gene expression,23,24 perhaps through a mechanism involving nuclear factor-kB activation, an effect that would tend to decrease the nitrosative stress that accompanies cytokine From the Cardiology Section, Evans Department of Medicine, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. Reprint requests to Joseph Loscalzo, MD, PhD, Boston University School of Medicine, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, 715 Albany St, W-507, Boston, MA 02118. (Circulation. 2000;101:1206-1218.) © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. Circulation is available at http://www.circulationaha.org 1206 Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Awtry and Loscalzo Aspirin 1207 The production of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid and their physiological effects. HPETE indicates hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid; PG, prostaglandin; Plt, platelet; and RBF, renal blood flow. elaboration. Aspirin can also directly scavenge hydroxyl radicals to form the 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoate derivatives, which themselves serve as markers of oxidative stress25 and quench oxy-radical flux,26 and can acetylate the e-amino groups of lysine residues in proteins,27 which prevents their oxidation.28 This antioxidant effect on proteins may be important in limiting both lipoprotein oxidation and fibrinogen oxidation; in the latter case, oxidation enhances fibrin formation,27,29 and lysine acetylation enhances fibrinolysis.30 It is likely through this combination of effects that aspirin reduces the inflammatory response in patients with coronary artery disease.31 Pharmacology/Pharmacokinetics Aspirin is rapidly absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract and results in a measurable inhibition of platelet function within 60 minutes.17,32 This antiplatelet effect is associated with prolongation of the bleeding time and inhibition of TXA2-dependent platelet aggregation.33 These effects occur even before acetylsalicylic acid is detectable in the peripheral blood, owing to the exposure of platelets to aspirin in the portal circulation.34 Enteric coating of aspirin significantly delays its absorption.35 The plasma half-life of aspirin is only 20 minutes; however, because platelets cannot generate new COX, the effects of aspirin last for the duration of the life of the platelet ('10 days). After a single dose of aspirin, platelet COX activity recovers by '10% per day as a function of platelet turnover.36 Although it may take 10 days for the total platelet population to be renewed, and thus restore normal COX activity, it has been shown that if as little as 20% of platelets have normal COX activity, hemostasis may be normal.37,38 The dose of aspirin required to obtain adequate platelet inhibition has been studied extensively. A single dose of 100 mg of aspirin effectively abolishes the production of TXA2 in normal individuals, as well as in patients with atherosclerotic disease.39,40 Single doses below 100 mg result in a dosedependent effect on TXA2 production; the effect of repeated daily doses is cumulative, although .24 hours may be required to achieve maximal COX inhibition.38,39,41 Therapeutic benefit in a variety of cardiovascular diseases has been demonstrated with doses of 30 to 1500 mg/d; higher doses do not appear to be more effective but may increase the risk of GI side effects.17,42 Low-dose aspirin or controlled-release preparations may result in somewhat preferential inhibition of platelet COX over endothelial COX.33,40,43 This differential effect has theoretical advantages in that intact endothelial PGI2 production may enhance the antithrombotic effects of aspirin; however, the clinical importance of maintaining normal PGI2 production remains undetermined. Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease Acute Therapy Acute Myocardial Infarction The importance of platelets and thrombosis in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes is well established. Although early studies of the use of aspirin as an antithrombotic agent in the acute treatment of myocardial infarction (MI) yielded conflicting results, the Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-2)44 has since unequivocally established the benefit of aspirin in this setting. In this trial, 17 187 patients presenting within 24 hours of the onset of a suspected acute MI (AMI) were randomized to receive intravenous streptokinase (1.5 MU), 162.5 mg of aspirin daily for 30 days, both, or neither. At the end of 5 weeks, patients receiving aspirin therapy alone had a highly significant 23% reduction in vascular mortality and a nearly 50% reduction in the risk of nonfatal reinfarction and nonfatal stroke. This benefit occurred irrespective of whether heparin was given. These reductions translate into the avoidance of '25 deaths and 10 to 15 nonfatal reinfarctions or strokes by treating 1000 patients with aspirin for 1 month. Additionally, there was no increase in major bleeding complications (including no increase in cerebral hemorrhage or need for transfusion) with Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 1208 Circulation March 14, 2000 TABLE 1. Benefit of Aspirin in Unstable Angina % Death or Nonfatal MI Reference VA Cooperative Study53 No. of Patients Dose, mg Duration of Treatment Aspirin Control % Reduction (P ) % Mortality Aspirin Control % Reduction (P ) 1266 325 QD 12 wk 5.0 10.1 51 (0.0005) 1.6 3.3 51 (0.054) Canadian Multicenter Trial54 555 325 QID 24 mo 8.6 17.0 51 (0.008) 3.0 11.7 71 (0.004) Théroux et al55 479 325 BID 6d 3.3 12.0 72 (0.01) 0.0 1.7 RISC52,56,57* 796 75 QD 5d 2.5 5.8 57 (0.033) 0.25 0.25 zzz 0 (NS) 6 mo 8.9 19.0 53 (,0.0001) 2.0 3.8 47 (NS) 12 mo 11.0 21.4 49 (0.0001) 2.8 4.5 38 (NS) *Included patients with unstable angina and non–Q-wave infarctions. Results were similar in both groups. aspirin therapy, and the mortality benefit was maintained after 10 years of follow-up.45 In the past decade, thrombolytic therapy has become the cornerstone of medical management of AMI.46,47 Aspirin, however, remains an important adjunctive therapy. In ISIS2,44 administration of streptokinase alone was associated with a 25% reduction in vascular deaths, and the effect of aspirin therapy was additive (42% reduction in vascular mortality with combined aspirin and streptokinase therapy). Additionally, an excess of nonfatal reinfarctions was seen in the first several days after treatment with streptokinase alone, likely as a result of plasmin-induced platelet activation; this increase was entirely prevented by the concomitant use of aspirin. Compared with aspirin as an adjunct to thrombolysis, heparin appears to be associated with a higher early patency rate of the infarct-related artery, although aspirin was associated with a trend toward a decreased 7-day reocclusion rate.48 The addition of heparin to aspirin does not clearly decrease mortality or reinfarction and is associated with an increase in bleeding complications.49,50 A meta-analysis of 32 trials using aspirin as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis demonstrated significantly decreased reocclusion rates (11% versus 25%) and recurrent ischemic events (25% versus 41%) with aspirin therapy.51 Unstable Angina and Acute Non–ST-Segment–Elevation MI Several studies have clearly demonstrated a beneficial role for aspirin in the treatment of unstable angina (Table 1).52–55 Despite instituting aspirin therapy at various doses (75 to 1300 mg/d) and differing intervals after a patient’s initial presentation (,24 hours to ,8 days), these trials have consistently demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of death or death and nonfatal MI. Additionally, in the Research Group on Instability in Coronary Artery Disease in Southeast Sweden (RISC) trial,56 treatment with aspirin (75 mg/d) decreased the progression to severe angina necessitating cardiac catheterization by 40% at 3 months (10.8% versus 18.1%) and 29% at 12 months (20.8% versus 29.2%). Low-dose aspirin (75 mg/d) has also been shown to decrease the risk of MI or death in patients with asymptomatic ischemia on treadmill testing after an episode of unstable angina or a non–Q-wave MI.57 A review of '4000 patients with unstable angina treated with aspirin or placebo demonstrated a 5% absolute risk reduction in nonfatal stroke or MI or vascular death (9% versus 14%)42; this corresponds to 50 vascular events avoided per 1000 patients treated with aspirin for 6 months. Aspirin has been compared with heparin as both alternative and adjunctive therapy in the setting of unstable angina. In the RISC trial,56 treatment with heparin alone provided no significant benefit for the incidence of MI and death, although the significant delay in instituting heparin therapy likely contributed to this finding (average delay 33 hours). Aspirin therapy was significantly better than heparin; however, the combination of aspirin and heparin produced the greatest benefit. Other studies have demonstrated a greater benefit of heparin over aspirin therapy55,58,59 and a potential increase in bleeding complications with combination therapy.55 In a recent meta-analysis, the addition of heparin to aspirin therapy in unstable angina and non–Q-wave MI resulted in a nonsignificant 33% decrease in the risk of MI or death compared with aspirin alone; this benefit occurred without an increase in bleeding complications.60 In addition, therapy with aspirin may prevent the early reactivation of angina observed after discontinuation of heparin therapy.61 Secondary Prevention After MI There have been 6 large, randomized trials that used aspirin alone as long-term treatment after an AMI,62– 67 and all but 1 of these62 demonstrated a trend toward decreased mortality with aspirin therapy. The results of these trials and 139 others that evaluated the long-term use of aspirin in a wide range of patients were reviewed in a meta-analysis by the Antiplatelet Trialists in 1994.42 This analysis comprised '100 000 patients, 70 000 of whom were considered “high-risk patients” by virtue of a prior history of AMI, unstable angina, stable angina, prior percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, or peripheral vascular disease. Overall, among these high-risk patients, aspirin reduced the risk of nonfatal MI by approximately one-third, the risk of nonfatal stroke by one-third, and the risk of vascular death by one-sixth. Among '20 000 of these patients with a prior history of MI, aspirin therapy decreased the risk of vascular events over an average 2-year treatment period from 17.1% to 13.5%, corresponding to an absolute decrease of 36 events per 1000 patients treated. Among 11 000 patients with a prior stroke or Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Awtry and Loscalzo TABLE 2. Aspirin 1209 Studies of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events No. of Patients Dose, mg Length of Follow-up Total Mortality, RR (95% CI) Nonfatal MI, RR (95% CI) Stroke, RR (95% CI) 22 071 325 5y 0.96 (0.80–1.14) 0.59 (0.47–0.74) 1.22 (0.93–1.60) Peto et al 5139 500 6y 0.89* 0.97* 1.15 (0.75–1.50) Thrombosis Prevention Trial84 5085 75 6.4 y 1.06 (0.88–1.28) 0.68 (0.52–0.88) 0.98 (0.65–1.45) Varied 5.4 y 0.86 (0.72–1.03) 0.68 (0.49–0.93) 0.99 (0.71–1.36) Reference Physicians’ Health Study81 82 Manson et al†88 87 678 RR is for aspirin vs nonaspirin groups. *Result not statistically significant; CIs not available. †RRs for subgroup taking up to 6 aspirin per week vs nonaspirin group. TIA, aspirin therapy was associated with an event rate of 18.4% compared with a rate of 22.2% in control subjects (3-year decrease in absolute event rate of 38 events per 1000 patients). In other high-risk patients, the benefit was somewhat less but still significant: the 1-year benefit in this group was '20 events per 1000 patients treated with aspirin. These results clearly demonstrate a significant treatment effect of aspirin when given as secondary prevention in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. Additionally, the results were significant in all groups irrespective of age, gender, or the presence of hypertension or diabetes. A wide range of dosing regimens was evaluated in this trial (most frequently 75 to 325 mg/d), and these regimens were equally effective. Given the effectiveness of a dose of 162.5 mg/d in the ISIS-2 trial44 and the higher incidence of GI side effects when aspirin is used chronically at higher doses (see below), it seems reasonable to begin treatment with a dose of 160 to 325 mg and continue chronic treatment with 75 to 160 mg/d in patients with coronary artery disease. After Revascularization Percutaneous revascularization with balloon angioplasty or intracoronary stenting results in local vascular trauma, with exposure of the subendothelium to the vascular space. This highly thrombogenic milieu predisposes to intraluminal thrombus development with either abrupt closure or subacute thrombosis of the vessel in 3.5% to 8.6% of procedures.68 –70 Several studies have demonstrated a significant decrease in acute complications of angioplasty with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole,71 although this combination provides little additional benefit over aspirin alone.72 Compared with aspirin alone or a regimen of aspirin plus warfarin, the combination of ticlopidine (500 mg/d for 1 month) and aspirin (325 mg/d) in patients undergoing intracoronary stent placement significantly decreases the 30-day combined end point of death, target-vessel revascularization, angiographic thrombosis, or MI (relative risk [RR] 0.15 for combined therapy versus aspirin alone).73 This benefit is seen irrespective of whether the stent deployment is felt to be “successful” with a low risk for thrombosis73 or if high-risk markers for stent thrombosis are present.74 Coronary artery bypass surgery with saphenous vein grafts is associated with a 5% to 15% graft occlusion rate during the first postoperative month,75,76 which is largely related to thrombosis at the anastomotic site as a result of endothelial disruption and vessel damage.77 When given in the immediate postoperative period, aspirin clearly decreases the rate of early thrombotic graft occlusion by '50%, and continued aspirin therapy for 1 year further decreases the rate of occlusive events.75,76 Preoperative administration of aspirin is associated with increased bleeding complications but offers no additional benefit in early graft patency compared with providing aspirin 6 hours after surgery.78 Although there does not appear to be additional benefit of aspirin with regard to long-term graft patency after 1 year of therapy,79 continued aspirin therapy is required for secondary prevention of vascular events in these patients. Treatment with ticlopidine or sulfinpyrazone also improves early graft patency; however, these agents have not been shown to be better than aspirin.80 Primary Prevention In light of the benefit of aspirin in the treatment of acute cardiovascular disease and in the secondary prevention of recurrent events, enthusiasm has developed for the evaluation of aspirin as a primary preventive measure (Table 2). There have been 2 large, randomized trials of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events that enrolled male physicians without prior MI and with a low incidence of prior cardiovascular disease (eg, TIA or angina).81,82 The Physicians’ Health Study randomized 22 071 subjects between the ages of 40 and 84 years to treatment with aspirin (325 mg every other day) or placebo.81 The study was stopped prematurely after an average follow-up of 5 years owing to a highly significant 44% reduction in the risk of MI in the aspirintreated group (0.26% per year versus 0.44% per year), an effect that was limited to participants over the age of 50 years. Nonetheless, there was no decrease in cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, there was a nonsignificant increase in hemorrhagic stroke (RR 2.14) and a significant increase in GI bleeding requiring transfusion. The British Physicians’ Study enrolled 5139 subjects and also demonstrated no difference in cardiovascular mortality after 6 years of aspirin therapy (500 mg/d).82 Importantly, this trial showed no significant difference in the incidence of MI but a significant increase in disabling strokes. Combined analyses of these results demonstrated a significant 33% treatment-related reduction in nonfatal MI but still failed to show a decrease in mortality and demonstrated a borderline increase in hemorrhagic strokes and a nonsignificant increase in all strokes.42,83 These 2 trials studied a population of patients who have a very low risk for cardiovascular events. Individuals at higher risk for the development of cardiovascular events (based on their risk factor profile) were enrolled in the Thrombosis Prevention Trial84 and randomized to aspirin (75 mg/d), Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 1210 Circulation March 14, 2000 warfarin (average dose 4.1 mg/d), both, or neither. After .6 years of follow-up, there was a 20% reduction in ischemic heart disease events (cardiac death, fatal or nonfatal MI) in the aspirin-treated groups. This difference was almost entirely accounted for by a 32% reduction in nonfatal events, without a significant effect on mortality. In contrast, warfarin therapy resulted in a 21% reduction in ischemic events, mostly as a result of a 39% reduction in fatal events. Neither of these therapies alone resulted in an increase in the total number of strokes. The combination of aspirin and warfarin produced the greatest reduction in ischemic events (34%) but was also associated with an increase in hemorrhagic and fatal strokes. Patients with chronic stable angina have a significant risk of developing subsequent cardiovascular events,85 and several studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of aspirin in this group of patients. In the Physician’s Health Study, patients who had chronic stable angina and received aspirin had an 87% reduction in the risk of MI compared with their counterparts who received placebo.86 Similarly, in the Swedish Angina Pectoris Aspirin Trial, 2035 patients with chronic stable angina but without prior MI who received aspirin (75 mg/d) had a 34% decrease in the combined risk of MI and sudden death.87 The risk of stroke, however, was increased by aspirin use in both studies. No randomized data are available regarding the use of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. However, in a prospective cohort study of 87 678 US nurses, the use of up to 6 aspirin per week did not alter the risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, or important vascular events.88 The risk of first MI was significantly reduced (RR 0.68), although this beneficial effect was limited to women over the age of 50 years. These findings are consistent with the results of primary prevention trials in men; however, definitive recommendations await the results of the ongoing Women’s Health Study.89 In summary, the primary prevention trials demonstrate that aspirin therapy does not decrease cardiovascular mortality but significantly decreases the risk of nonfatal MI. There does not appear to be a consistent effect on the incidence of stroke, although there is a trend toward an increase in stroke risk. Additionally, there is an increase in nonfatal bleeding. The absolute benefit of aspirin therapy clearly increases as the risk of cardiovascular events increases in the treatment group (Table 3). Therefore, in patients with a relatively low risk of developing cardiovascular disease, the risk of prophylactic aspirin therapy may be outweighed by the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Conversely, in patients believed to be at high risk, the benefits of therapy, specifically a decrease in the development of MI, may outweigh the risk of hemorrhagic complications, and prophylactic therapy may be warranted. Aspirin in Cerebrovascular Disease Acute Therapy Two large, randomized trials of aspirin use in the setting of an acute, ischemic stroke have recently been reported (Table 4).90,91 Combined, these trials enrolled .40 000 patients within 48 hours of the onset of neurological symptoms and TABLE 3. Gradient of Benefit in Trials of Aspirin Therapy Indication for Therapy Magnitude of Benefit Treatment of AMI 24 deaths/1000 patients treated for 5 wk Treatment of unstable angina 50 events/1000 patients treated for 6 mo Secondary prevention After MI 36 events/1000 patients treated for 2 y After CVA/TIA 38 events/1000 patients treated for 2 y Primary prevention In patients with angina 51 events/1000 patients treated for 4 y In “high-risk” patients 5 events/1000 men treated for 1 y In “low-risk” patients 4 events/1000 men treated for 5 y CVA indicates cerebrovascular accident. “High-risk” refers to patients in the top 20% of risk based on their risk factor profile.84 “Low-risk” refers to patients with minimal risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. demonstrated a significant decrease in the risk of recurrent stroke and in the combined incidence of death or nonfatal stroke (Table 4). Importantly, there was no significant increase in hemorrhagic stroke. These results correspond to a reduction of 10 deaths or recurrent strokes per 1000 patients after 2 to 4 weeks of aspirin therapy. These trials also demonstrated a trend toward a decreased incidence of death or significant disability (dependence) at 4 weeks of followup. The addition of heparin (5000 or 12 500 IU subcutaneously, twice a day) to aspirin yielded no further benefit but increased bleeding complications.90 In addition, heparin therapy alone effected no difference in the rate of death or recurrent stroke but resulted in a significant increase in hemorrhagic strokes and major noncerebral bleeding. Secondary and Primary Prevention There are conflicting results from individual trials regarding the effectiveness of aspirin in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events.92–95 Included in the Antiplatelet Trialists’ review were 12 randomized trials of .10 000 patients with a prior stroke or TIA.42 Most of these patients were treated with aspirin (50 to 1500 mg/d), although some received other antiplatelet agents, either alone or in combination with aspirin. Overall, there was a highly significant 17% reduction in the risk of nonfatal stroke and of all vascular events (nonfatal stroke or MI or vascular death) in patients treated for a mean of 33 months. This effect was similar whether the patient presented with a TIA or a completed stroke and resulted in a reduction of 37 vascular events per 1000 patients treated. Similar results have been reported in 3 subsequent trials.96 –98 In a recent meta-analysis of 10 randomized trials comprising 9172 patients with cerebrovascular disease who were given prolonged aspirin administration, aspirin resulted in a significant 13% reduction in the risk of subsequent stroke compared with placebo.99 Overall, data regarding the use of aspirin for the primary prevention of strokes in patients at high risk are not encouraging. In the British Physicians’ Study,82 aspirin therapy significantly decreased the incidence of TIA (15.9% versus 27.5%; P,0.05) but did not decrease the risk of stroke and in fact increased the risk of disabling stroke (19.1% versus Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Awtry and Loscalzo TABLE 4. Aspirin 1211 Trials of Aspirin Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Chinese Acute Stroke Trial91 International Stroke Trial90 Aspirin No Aspirin 2P Aspirin No Aspirin 2P Death 3.3 3.9 0.04 9.0 9.4 NS Death and nonfatal CVA 5.3 5.9 0.03 11.3 12.4 ,0.05 Recurrent CVA 1.6 2.1 0.01 2.8 3.9 ,0.001 Hemorrhagic CVA 1.1 0.9 NS 0.9 0.8 NS 30.5 31.6 0.08 62.2 63.5 0.07 End Point Death or dependence CVA indicates cerebrovascular accident. Values are percentages (except for 2P values). In the International Stroke Trial, follow-up was at 2 weeks except for “death or dependence,” which was evaluated at 6 months. In the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial, follow-up was at 4 weeks. 7.4%; P,0.05). Similarly, an increased risk of stroke, primarily of the hemorrhagic type, was noted in the Physicians’ Health Study.81 In a small study of asymptomatic patients with carotid bruits and $50% stenosis of a carotid artery, aspirin failed to prevent subsequent cerebrovascular events.100 Four placebo-controlled trials have evaluated aspirin for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation101–104 and, when their data are combined, demonstrate a small but significant reduction in risk.105 However, except in the very-low-risk patient (age ,65 years with no other cardiovascular disease), the reduction in stroke risk is much greater with warfarin therapy in trials that directly compare the 2 agents (68% versus 12%).101,103,105–107 The ideal dose of aspirin for the prevention of future vascular events in patients with TIAs or minor stroke has been the subject of much debate,108,109 although several trials have demonstrated increased bleeding complications with higher doses.95,98 In the meta-analysis mentioned above, the beneficial effect of aspirin on the incidence of recurrent stroke occurred irrespective of dose (50 to 1500 mg/d).99 Additionally, in a large group of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, low-dose aspirin (81 or 325 mg/d) was associated with a lower risk of stroke, MI, or death compared with high-dose regimens (650 or 1300 mg/d).110,111 Thus, as is the case with coronary artery disease, a low-dose aspirin regimen appears appropriate for secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease. Adverse Effects The inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis is responsible for the anti-inflammatory effects of aspirin but also results in the alteration of normally protective prostaglandin functions with potentially serious consequences, including gastric ulcers, TABLE 5. renal failure, and impaired platelet function with resultant hemorrhagic complications. These side effects and others will be discussed next. GI Toxicity Aspirin-induced inhibition of COX results in loss of the cytoprotective effects of PGE2 on the gastric mucosa. This mechanism likely accounts in part for the more frequent development of GI side effects in the aspirin-treated patients in most trials.93,95,97,112 Minor GI symptoms (including nausea, vomiting, heartburn, and indigestion) have been reported in 5.2% to 40% of patients treated with aspirin versus 0.7% to 34% of patients taking placebo,52,54,62,81,95 peptic ulcers in 0.8% to 2.6% of aspirin-treated patients versus 0% to 1.2% with placebo,81,82,93 and major GI bleeding (melena requiring transfusion or hematemesis) in ,1% of patients in both groups.53,81,84,87,90 Minor bleeding episodes (epistaxis, hematuria, melena not requiring therapy, and bruising) occur frequently in patients taking aspirin and are significantly more common than among their placebo-treated counterparts.84,104,113 In the United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack (UK-TIA) trial,95 the incidence of GI symptoms was not only significantly higher in the aspirin-treated group than in the placebo group, but GI symptoms were significantly more frequent in the high-dose (1200 mg/d) than in the low-dose (300 mg/d) aspirin groups (2P,0.001 for both comparisons). An overview of randomized trials of aspirin therapy similarly found that GI toxicity (both major and minor) was dose related with daily doses between 30 and 1300 mg.112 Nonetheless, even low doses of aspirin (50 to 75 mg/d) are not free from side effects, may still be associated with increased GI bleeding,97,104,113 and frequently precipitate the discontinuation of therapy.52,56 Recommendations for Aspirin Use Clinical Indication Recommended Dose For treatment of Initial therapy: 160–325 mg AMI Subsequent daily dose: 75–160 mg Acute thromboembolic stroke Unstable angina Secondary prevention after MI, stroke, or TIA and in patients with chronic stable angina Primary prevention Daily therapy with 160–325 mg No clear indication at this time. Consider therapy with 75–160 mg/d in patients believed to be at high risk for development of cardiovascular disease. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 1212 Circulation March 14, 2000 Hemorrhagic Stroke Several studies have suggested an increase in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke in patients treated with aspirin in the setting of an AMI44 or acute ischemic stroke,90,91 as well as when aspirin is used for the primary81 or secondary97 prevention of cardiovascular events. A recent meta-analysis of 16 trials comprising 55 462 patients treated with aspirin or control therapy demonstrated a significant increase in hemorrhagic strokes (RR 1.84; P,0.001) despite a decrease in ischemic strokes, total strokes, and MI.114 This relative risk translated into an absolute increase of 12 hemorrhagic strokes per 10 000 patients treated with aspirin. Other Side Effects The use of nonaspirin inhibitors of COX (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) may be associated with an increased risk of renal insufficiency and worsening of hypertension control owing to inhibition of renal vasodilatory prostaglandins.115,116 Aspirin is a relatively weak inhibitor of renal prostaglandin synthesis and does not significantly affect renal function or blood pressure control when used at the low to moderate doses suggested for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.117 However, at high doses (1500 mg/d), aspirin can significantly reduce renal sodium excretion in patients with heart failure.118 Aspirin has been reported to counteract the systemic arterial vasodilatory effects and attenuate the mortality benefit of ACE inhibition by enalapril in patients with congestive heart failure.119 –121 A similar loss of efficacy was not seen in a post hoc analysis of the Captopril and Thrombolysis Study.122 A recent review of the literature in this regard suggests that low-dose aspirin (#100 mg/d) has very little interaction with the effects of ACE inhibitors, whereas higher doses may attenuate the benefit of these agents in patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure.123 A small percentage of people, most of whom have preexisting asthmatic disease, suffer from aspirin intolerance or sensitivity. Administration of aspirin to these persons results in the development of bronchoconstriction, rhinitis, and/or urticaria.124 The mechanism of this sensitivity is not known but likely results from the inhibition of COX and possibly from abnormal leukotriene production.125 Aspirin sensitivity can result in severe respiratory decompensation; however, most patients can be safely desensitized by the gradual administration of increasing doses of aspirin. Making a Safer Aspirin Attempts have been made to decrease the gastric toxicity of aspirin by pharmacological manipulation. Sustained-release43 and topical formulations126 have been demonstrated to produce relatively selective inhibition of platelet TXA2 production with minimal effects on vascular and gastric prostanoids and thus may have less gastrotoxicity. Enteric-coated aspirin tablets may be less gastrotoxic as a result of decreased gastric irritation. In a small endoscopic study of asymptomatic patients undergoing long-term aspirin therapy,127 gastric mucosal erosions were noted in 90% of patients treated with regular aspirin compared with 60% of patients receiving enteric-coated aspirin. Additionally, GI blood loss has been shown to be less with enteric-coated aspirin than with the noncoated formulation.128 Nonetheless, because the mechanism of action of enteric-coated aspirin still leads to the systemic inhibition of COX, coated aspirin is associated with significant gastric toxicity compared with placebo127 and results in a similar risk of upper GI bleeding compared with regular, uncoated aspirin.129 Regular aspirin is rapidly absorbed from the acid environment of the stomach. Enteric coating of aspirin results in its release into the alkaline environment of the small bowel, where it is hydrolyzed. As a result, enteric-coated aspirin has lower bioavailability than regular aspirin.130 Nonetheless, the antiplatelet effects of full-dose (.300 mg) enteric-coated aspirin are similar to those of uncoated formulations.130,131 However, the efficacy of low-dose (,100 mg) enteric-coated preparations has not been clearly established, and it is possible that such doses may result in inadequate platelet inhibition. Thus, if coated aspirin is prescribed, larger doses may be necessary to obtain the desired antiplatelet effect. The dissociation of the effects of the different COX enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) has stimulated the production of agents that preferentially inhibit COX-2 and allow for the inhibition of inflammatory prostaglandins while leaving homeostatic prostaglandins relatively intact. Several new NSAIDs have been shown to have relative COX-2 selectivity132–134 and appear to be associated with fewer gastric side effects.7,135,136 The therapeutic antithrombotic effects and the toxic gastric effects of aspirin are both mediated through the inhibition of COX-1; therefore, dissociation of these effects is not feasible. However, coadministration of aspirin with the synthetic PGE2 analog misoprostol allows for the complete inhibition of TXA2 synthesis in platelets while maintaining gastric protection. This approach decreases the risk of gastric ulceration, erosion, and hemorrhage in dogs.137,138 Furthermore, in a randomized trial in healthy volunteers given anti-inflammatory doses of aspirin (3900 mg/d), cotreatment with 200 mg of misoprostol twice daily significantly reduced endoscopically documented gastric and duodenal mucosal injury (P,0.006).139 Other novel methods of improving the safety profile of aspirin are being developed. Animal models suggest that the intragastric administration of aspirin stimulates the release of NO, which decreases gastric acid secretion and increases cytoprotection, thus limiting gastric mucosal damage.140 Furthermore, compared with regular aspirin, the administration of NO-releasing derivatives of aspirin has no topical gastric irritating effects, does not worsen stress-induced gastric ulceration, and protects against toxic gastric injury.141–143 This marked improvement in gastric toxicity occurs with these agents despite the equivalent inhibition of COX and equipotent or enhanced antithrombotic activity compared with aspirin.143 The clinical safety and efficacy of these agents remain to be determined. Comparison With Other Antiplatelet Agents Despite aspirin’s demonstrated effectiveness in treating and preventing atherosclerotic disease, it produces only partial inhibition of platelet aggregation, and therefore it is a relatively weak antiplatelet agent. Additionally, a minority of Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Awtry and Loscalzo patients appear to be relatively resistant to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin, even when it is administered in large doses.144 Platelet aggregation studies have demonstrated incomplete inhibition of aggregation in 25% of patients with prior ischemic stroke who were receiving long-term aspirin therapy (minimum dose 325 mg/d).145 Some patients demonstrate improved platelet inhibition at higher aspirin doses; however, 8% of patients taking 1300 mg of aspirin per day may still be aspirin resistant.145 The mechanism of this decreased efficacy of aspirin in some patients is not well understood but may reflect the limited potency of aspirin as an inhibitor of COX-2, the expression of which has recently been demonstrated in human platelets.146 Aspirin does not completely inhibit TXA2 synthesis,41 and other non-TXA2– dependent activators of platelet aggregation (eg, thrombin, ADP, and collagen) can bypass the aspirin-inhibitory effect and result in thrombosis. Newer agents that interrupt these other pathways or interfere with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, the final common pathway in platelet aggregation, may prove to be more effective antithrombotic agents.147 Several other antiplatelet agents have therefore been used for the treatment of thrombotic cardiovascular disease and have been compared with aspirin in randomized clinical trials. In the Antiplatelet Trialists’ overview, several antithrombotic regimens were evaluated, including aspirin, ticlopidine, or sulfinpyrazone alone or the combination of aspirin plus dipyridamole.42 Direct and indirect comparisons of the effectiveness of these regimens demonstrated no significant difference in vascular events, although the numbers of patients enrolled in trials that directly compared agents were low. Ticlopidine and Clopidogrel Ticlopidine and clopidogrel are thienopyridine derivatives that inhibit ADP-induced binding of fibrinogen to platelets, a process necessary for platelet aggregation.148 In randomized trials of patients with recent stroke or TIA, ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily) has demonstrated a significant 23.3% reduction in the combined incidence of stroke, MI, or vascular death compared with placebo (11.3% per year versus 14.8% per year with placebo; P50.02),149 as well as a 21% lower risk of stroke (10% versus 13%; P50.024) and a 12% reduction in the combined risk of death and nonfatal stroke (17% versus 19%; P50.048) compared with aspirin (650 mg twice daily).150 However, ticlopidine therapy resulted in severe neutropenia in '1% of patients. The Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk for Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) study compared the efficacy of aspirin (325 mg/d) with clopidogrel (75 mg/d) for reducing the combined incidence of ischemic stroke, MI, or vascular death in 19 185 patients with a recent stroke or MI or with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.151 After an average follow-up of almost 2 years, clopidogrel demonstrated a significant 8.7% benefit over aspirin (5.32% versus 5.83%; P50.043). Adverse events were not significantly different between the agents, and neutropenia was rare (0.1%) with clopidogrel. Aspirin 1213 Dipyridamole Dipyridamole is a pyrimidopyrimidine derivative that inhibits cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases and blocks the uptake of adenosine, resulting in a reduction in platelet cytosolic calcium and subsequent inhibition of platelet activation.152 Initial studies demonstrated no significant benefit of adding dipyridamole to aspirin for the secondary prevention of stroke 94 or recurrent MI. 153 The European Stroke Prevention-2 trial randomized 6602 patients with prior minor stroke or TIA to treatment with aspirin (50 mg/d), dipyridamole (400 mg/d), both, or neither. After 2 years of follow-up, the 2 agents alone were found to be equally effective in reducing the risk of stroke (RR reductions: 18% with aspirin, P50.013; 16% with dipyridamole, P50.039) and stroke or death combined (RR reductions: 13% with aspirin, P50.016; 15% with dipyridamole, P50.015) compared with placebo.104 Furthermore, the benefits were additive with combination therapy (RR reductions: 37% for stroke, P,0.001; 24% for combined end point, P,0.001). A recent review of 15 randomized trials suggests that the addition of dipyridamole to aspirin will reduce the risk of vascular events by an additional 15% over the effects of aspirin alone.99 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Irrespective of the activating stimulus, the final common pathway of platelet activation involves exposure and activation of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, the platelet fibrinogen receptor. Inhibitors of this receptor, including monoclonal antibodies and peptide- and nonpeptide-derived agents, have been studied extensively in various settings. When added to standard antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (325 mg) and intravenous heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization, the monoclonal antibody c7E3 (abciximab) reduced the risk of ischemic complications (death, nonfatal MI, unplanned revascularization procedures, or refractory angina) by 35% (8.3% versus 12.8% with placebo; P50.008) in patients undergoing high-risk angioplasty (unstable angina, evolving AMI, or high-risk coronary morphology)154 and by 56% (5.2% versus 11.7% with placebo; P,0.001) in patients undergoing urgent or elective percutaneous revascularization.155 A similar reduction in the risk of early ischemic events was demonstrated with tirofiban, a synthetic, nonpeptide IIb/IIIa inhibitor, after high-risk coronary angioplasty156 and with abciximab after intracoronary stenting.157 The benefit of platelet inhibition in patients with unstable angina has been assessed recently by monitoring troponin T release, which serves as a surrogate marker for thrombus formation. Patients with refractory unstable angina and elevated troponin T levels were shown to constitute a high-risk subgroup who particularly benefited from antiplatelet therapy with abciximab.158 When added to treatment with intravenous heparin in patients with unstable angina, treatment with intravenous eptifibatide (integrelin), a peptide IIb/IIIa inhibitor, decreased the incidence and duration of ischemic episodes noted on 24-hour ECG monitoring compared with aspirin therapy.159 In patients with unstable angina or non– Q-wave MI, the addition of tirofiban to aspirin therapy (325 mg/d) reduced the composite end point of death, MI, or refractory ischemia by 32% after 48 hours of therapy (3.8% Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 1214 Circulation March 14, 2000 versus 5.6% with heparin; P50.01)160; however, at 30 days, the difference was no longer significant. In a group of patients with more severe unstable angina and a higher proportion of non–Q-wave MI, treatment with aspirin plus tirofiban resulted in an increase in mortality compared with a regimen of aspirin plus intravenous heparin (mortality rate of 4.6% versus 1.1% at 7 days; P50.012).161 However, the addition of tirofiban to a regimen of aspirin plus heparin decreased the composite end point of death, MI, or refractory ischemia at 7 days by 32% (12.9% versus 17.9%; P50.004). This benefit persisted, although to a smaller degree, at 30 days and at 6 months after treatment. Taken together, these trials demonstrate a significant benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors when administered in addition to usual aspirin therapy in patients with unstable coronary syndromes and after percutaneous revascularization. Although initial studies were complicated by increased rates of bleeding,154 with adjusted heparin dosing, the expected bleeding rate is not different from that with standard heparin and aspirin therapy.155,160,161 Conclusions Aspirin clearly decreases mortality and reinfarction when given as short-term therapy for AMI, when given to patients with unstable angina, and when given as long-term secondary preventive therapy in a wide range of patients with established cardiovascular disease. Despite the strength of the data in this regard, studies suggest that aspirin remains underused for both the treatment of acute coronary syndromes162,163 and for secondary prevention of recurrent events.164 –166 More than 10% of patients suffering an AMI do not receive aspirin therapy despite the absence of contraindications,162 and 20% to 50% of postinfarction patients may not be taking aspirin on an ongoing basis.164,165 The statistics are even worse in the elderly population: almost 30% of Medicare patients hospitalized for unstable angina are not treated with aspirin in the short term,163 and as many as 80% of nursing home patients with a prior history of MI may not be given aspirin.166 Nonetheless, its use in these settings should be the accepted standard unless absolute contraindications exist. The dose of aspirin should always be the lowest dose that is known to be effective (ie, 160 to 325 mg for acute treatment of cardiovascular events and 75 to 160 mg/d for primary and secondary prevention) because higher doses result in higher rates of complications. The role of aspirin in primary prevention is less clear. In patients felt to be at high risk of a future cardiac event owing to the presence of significant risk factors, prophylactic aspirin should be considered but weighed against the risk of potential complications. In patients at low risk of cardiac events, the risk of hemorrhagic complications may outweigh the benefits of therapy, and the current data do not support the use of prophylactic aspirin therapy in this setting. As newer aspirin regimens are developed that have improved safety profiles, the risk/benefit ratio may change to support the use of aspirin as primary prevention in a broader range of patients. Other antithrombotic agents, especially the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, which are capable of more complete platelet inhibition, are likely to play an increasingly greater role in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases; however, given its relative safety and extremely low cost, aspirin will continue to be an important agent in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases for the foreseeable future. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by National Institute of Health grants HL-48976, HL-53919, HL-53993, and HL-48743 and by a Merit Review Award from the US Veterans Administration. References 1. Stone E. An account of the success of the bark of the willow tree in the cure of agues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1763;53:195–200. 2. Dreser H. Pharmakologisches über aspirin (acetylsalicylsäure). Pfluger’s Arch. 1899;76:306 –318. 3. Weiss HJ, Aledort LM. Impaired platelet-connective-tissue reaction in man after aspirin ingestion. Lancet. 1967;2:495– 497. 4. Smith WL. Prostanoid biosynthesis and the mechanism of action. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:F118 –F191. 5. Williams CS, DuBois RN. Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase: why two isoforms? Am J Physiol. 1996;270:G393–G400. 6. Gierse JK, McDonald JJ, Hauser SD, Rangwala SH, Koboldt CM, Seibert K. A single amino acid difference between cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and -2 (COX-2) reverses the selectivity of COX-2 specific inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:15810 –15814. 7. Hawkey CJ. COX-2 inhibitors. Lancet. 1999;353:307–314. 8. Morita I, Schindler M, Regier MK, Otto JC, Hori T, DeWitt DL, Smith WL. Different intracellular locations for prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-1 and -2. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:10902–10908. 9. Xie WL, Chipman JG, Robertson DL, Erikson RL, Simmons DL. Expression of a mitogen-responsive gene encoding prostaglandin synthase is regulated by mRNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:2692–2696. 10. Kujubu DA, Fletcher BS, Varnum BC, Lim RW, Herschman HR. TIS10, a phorbol ester tumor promoter-inducible mRNA from Swiss 3T3 cells, encodes a novel prostaglandin synthase/cyclooxygenase homologue. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12866 –12872. 11. Roth GJ, Majerus PW. The mechanism of the effect of aspirin on human platelets, I: acetylation of a particulate fraction protein. J Clin Invest. 1975;56:624 – 632. 12. Loll PJ, Picot D, Garavito RM. The structural basis of aspirin activity inferred from the crystal structure of inactivated prostaglandin H2 synthase. Nat Struct Biol. 1995;2:637– 643. 13. Vane JR, Bakhle YS, Botting RM. Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;38:97–120. 14. Smith WL, DeWitt DL. Biochemistry of prostaglandin endoperoxidase H synthase-1 and -2 and their differential susceptibility to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Semin Nephrol. 1995;15:179 –194. 15. Hamberg M, Svensson J, Samuelsson B. Thromboxanes: a new group of biologically active compounds derived from prostaglandin endoperoxides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72:2294 –2298. 16. Fitzgerald GA. Mechanisms of platelet activation: thromboxane A2 as an amplifying signal for other agonists. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68: 11B–15B. 17. Patrono C, Collar B, Dalen J, Fuster V, Gent M, Harker L, Hirsh J, Roth G. Platelet-active drugs: the relationships among dose, effectiveness, and side effects. Chest. 1998;114:470S– 488S. 18. Jaffe EA, Weksler BB. Recovery of endothelial cell prostacyclin production after inhibition by low doses of aspirin. J Clin Invest. 1979;63: 532–535. 19. Lopez-Farre A, Caramelo C, Esteban A, Alberola ML, Millas I, Monton M, Casado S. Effects of aspirin on platelet-neutrophil interactions: role of nitric oxide and endothelin-1. Circulation. 1995;91:2080 –2088. 20. Bolz SS, Pohl U. Indomethacin enhances endothelial NO release: evidence for a role of PGI2 in the autocrine control of calcium-dependent autacoid production. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;36:437– 444. 21. Steer KA, Wallace TM, Bolton CH, Hartog M. Aspirin protects low density lipoprotein from oxidative modification. Heart. 1997;77: 333–337. 22. Husain S, Andrews NP, Mulcahy D, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA. Aspirin improves endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1998; 97:716 –720. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Awtry and Loscalzo 23. Farivar RS, Brecher P. Salicylate is a transcriptional inhibitor of the inducible nitric oxide synthase in cultured cardiac fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31585–31592. 24. Kimura A, Roseto J, Suh KY, Cohen AM, Bing RJ. Effect of acetylsalicylic acid on nitric oxide production in infarcted heart in situ. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;251:874 – 878. 25. Ghiselli A, Laurenti O, De Mattia G, Maiani G, Ferro-Luzzi A. Salicylate hydroxylation as an early marker of in vivo oxidative stress in diabetic patients. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;13:621– 626. 26. Betts WH, Whitehouse MW, Clelend LG, Vernon-Roberts B. In vitro antioxidant properties of potential biotransformation products of salicylate, sulfasalazine and aminopyridine. Free Radic Biol Med. 1985; 1:273–280. 27. Pinckard RN, Hawkins D, Farr RS. In vitro acetylation of plasma proteins, enzymes and DNA by aspirin. Nature. 1968;219:68 – 69. 28. Ezratty A, Freedman JE, Simon D, Loscalzo J. The antithrombotic effects of acetylation of fibrinogen by aspirin. J Vasc Med Biol. 1994; 5:152–159. 29. Upchurch GR Jr, Ramdev N, Walsh MT, Loscalzo J. Prothrombotic consequences of the oxidation of fibrinogen and their inhibition by aspirin. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998;5:9 –14. 30. Bjornsson TD, Schneider DE, Berger H Jr. Aspirin acetylates fibrinogen and enhances fibrinolysis: fibrinolytic effect is independent of changes in plasminogen activator levels. J Pharm Exp Ther. 1989;250:154 –161. 31. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracey RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risks of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:973–979. 32. Jimenez AH, Stubbs ME, Tofler GH, Winther K, Williams GH, Muller JE. Rapidity and duration of platelet suppression by enteric-coated aspirin in healthy young men. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:258 –262. 33. FitzGerald GA, Oates JA, Hawiger J, Maas RL, Roberts LJ II, Lawson JA, Brash AR. Endogenous biosynthesis of prostacyclin and thromboxane and platelet function during chronic administration of aspirin in man. J Clin Invest. 1983;71:676 – 688. 34. Penderson AK, Fitzgerald GA. Dose related kinetics of aspirin: presystemic acetylation of platelet cyclooxygenase. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1206 –1211. 35. Latini R, Cerletti C, de Gaetano G, Dejana E, Galletti F, Urso R, Marzot M. Comparative bioavailability of aspirin from buffered, enteric-coated and plain preparations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1986;24: 313–318. 36. Burch JW, Stanford N, Majerus PW. Inhibition of platelet prostaglandin synthase by oral aspirin. J Clin Invest. 1979;61:314 –319. 37. Bradlow BA, Chetty N. Dosage frequency for suppression of platelet function by low dose aspirin therapy. Thromb Res. 1982;27:99 –110. 38. Patrono C, Ciabattoni G, Patrignani P, Pugliese F, Fillabozzi P, Catella F, Davi G, Forni L. Clinical pharmacology of platelet cyclooxygenase inhibition. Circulation. 1985;72:177–184. 39. Patrignani P, Filabozzi P, Patrono C. Selective cumulative inhibition of platelet thromboxane production by low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects. J Clin Invest. 1982;69:1366 –1372. 40. Weksler BB, Pett SB, Alonso D, Richter RC, Stelzer P, Subramanian V, Tack-Goldman K, Gay WA Jr. Differential inhibition by aspirin of vascular and platelet prostaglandin synthesis in atherosclerotic patients. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:800 – 805. 41. Tohgi H, Konno S, Tamura K, Kimura B, Katsumi K. Effects of low-to-high doses of aspirin on platelet aggregability and metabolites of thromboxane A2 and prostacyclin. Stroke. 1992;23:1400 –1403. 42. Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy, I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ. 1994;308:81–106. 43. Clarke RJ, Mayo G, Price P, Fitzgerald GA. Suppression of thromboxane A2 but not systemic prostacyclin by controlled-release aspirin. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1137–1141. 44. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet. 1988;2:349 –360. 45. Baigent C, Collins R, Appleby P, Parish S, Sleight P, Peto R. ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. BMJ. 1998;316:1337–1343. Aspirin 1215 46. The GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:673– 682. 47. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343: 311–322. 48. Hsia J, Hamilton WP, Kleiman NS, Roberts R, Chaitman BR, Ross AM. A comparison between heparin and low-dose aspirin as adjunctive therapy with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1433–1437. 49. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico. GISSI-2: a factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1990;336:65–71. 50. ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1992;339:753–770. 51. Roux S, Christeller S, Lüdin E. Effects of aspirin on coronary reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after thrombolysis: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:671– 677. 52. The RISC Group. Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. Lancet. 1990;336:827– 830. 53. Lewis HD, Davis JW, Archibald DG, Steinke WE, Smitherman TC, Doherty JE, Schnaper HW, LeWinter MM, Linares E, Pouget JM, Sabharwal SC, Chesler E, DeMots H. Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:396 – 403. 54. Cairns JA, Gent M, Singer J, Finnie KJ, Froggatt GM, Holder DA, Jablonsky G, Kostuk WJ, Melendez LJ, Myers MG, Sackett DL, Sealey BJ, Tanser PH. Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina: results of a Canadian multicenter trial. N Engl J Med. 1985;313: 1369 –1375. 55. Théroux P, Ouimet H, McCans J, Latour JG, Joly P, Levy G, Pelletier E, Juneau M, Stasiak J, deGuis P. Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1105–1111. 56. Wallentin LC, and the Research Group on Instability in Coronary Artery Disease in Southeast Sweden. Aspirin (75 mg/day) after an episode of unstable coronary artery disease: long-term effects on the risk for myocardial infarction, occurrence of severe angina and the need for revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1587–1593. 57. Nyman I, Larsson H, Wallentin L, and the Research Group on Instability in Coronary Artery Disease in Southeast Sweden. Prevention of serious cardiac events by low-dose aspirin in patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. Lancet. 1992;340:497–501. 58. Théroux P, Waters D, Qui S, McCans J, deGuis P, Juneau M. Aspirin versus heparin to prevent myocardial infarction during the acute phase of unstable angina. Circulation. 1993;881:2045–2048. 59. Serneri GGN, Gensini GF, Poggesi L, Trotta F, Modesti PA, Boddi M, Ieri A, Margheri M, Casolo GC, Bini M, Rostagno C, Carnovali M, Rosanna A. Effect of heparin, aspirin, or alteplase in reduction of myocardial ischaemia in refractory unstable angina. Lancet. 1990;335: 615– 618. 60. Oler A, Whooley MA, Oler J, Grady D. Adding heparin to aspirin reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable angina: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1996;272:811– 815. 61. Théroux P, Water D, Lam J, Luneau M, McCans J. Reactivation of unstable angina after the discontinuation of heparin. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:141–145. 62. The Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study Research Group. The Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study: final results. Circulation. 1980;62(suppl V):V-79 –V-84. 63. The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Aspirin in coronary heart disease. J Chronic Dis. 1976;29:625– 642. 64. Elwood PC, Cochrane AL, Burr ML, Sweetnam PM, Williams G, Welsby E, Hughes SJ, Renton R. A randomized controlled trial of acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of mortality from myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1974;1:436 – 440. 65. The Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study Research Group. Persantine and aspirin in coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1980;62:449 – 461. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 1216 Circulation March 14, 2000 66. Elwood PC, Sweetnam PM. Aspirin and secondary mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1979;2:1313–1315. 67. Breddin K, Loew D, Lechner K, Oberla K, Walter E, on behalf of the German-Austrian Study Group. The German-Austrian Aspirin Trial: a comparison of acetylsalicylic acid, placebo, and phenprocoumon in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1980; 62(suppl V):V-63–V-72. 68. Baim DS, Carrozza JP. Stent thrombosis: closing in on the best preventive treatment. Circulation. 1997;95:1098 –1100. 69. de Feyter PJ, van den Brand M, Laarman GJ, van Domburg R, Serruys PW, Suryapranata H. Acute coronary artery occlusion during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: frequency, prediction, clinical course management and follow-up. Circulation. 1991;83: 927–936. 70. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, Belardi J, Sigwart U, Colonbo A, Goy JJ, van den Heuvel P, Delcan J, Morel M. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331: 489 – 495. 71. Schwartz L, Bourassa MG, Lesperance J, Aldridge HE, Kazim F, Salvatori VA, Henderson M, Bonan R, David PR. Aspirin and dipyridamole in the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1714 –1719. 72. Lembo NJ, Black AJ, Roubin GS, Wilentz JR, Mufson LH, Douglas JS Jr, King SB III. Effect of pretreatment with aspirin versus aspirin plus dipyridamole on frequency and type of acute complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65: 422– 426. 73. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, Gordon PC, Cutlip DE, Ho KK, Giambartolomei A, Diver DJ, Lasorda DM, Williams DO, Pocock SJ, Kuntz RE. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting: Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1665–1671. 74. Urban P, Macaya C, Rupprecht HJ, Kiemeneij F, Emanualsson H, Fontanelli A, Pieper M, Wesseling T, Sagnard L. Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk patients: the Multicenter Aspirin and Ticlopidine Trial after Intracoronary Stenting (MATTIS). Circulation. 1998; 98:2126 –2132. 75. Gavaghan TP, Gebski V, Baron DW. Immediate postoperative aspirin improves vein graft patency early and late after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a placebo-controlled, randomized study. Circulation. 1991;83:1526 –1533. 76. Goldman S, Copeland J, Morwitz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Ovitt T, Doherty J, Read R, Chesler E, Sako Y, Lancaster L, Emery R, Sharma GVRK, Josa M, Pacold I, Montoya A, Parikh D, Sethi G, Holt J, Kirklin J, Shabetai R, Moores W, Aldridge J, Masud Z, DeMots H, Floten S, Haakenson C, Harker LA. Improvement in early saphenous vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery with antiplatelet therapy: results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Circulation. 1988;77:1324 –1332. 77. Fuster V, Chesebro JH. Role of platelets and platelet inhibitors in aortocoronary artery vein-graft disease. Circulation. 1986;73:227–232. 78. Goldman S, Copeland J, Moritz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Ovitt T, Kern KB, Sethi G, Sharma GV, Khuri S. Starting aspirin therapy after operation: effects on early graft patency: Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Circulation. 1991;84:520 –526. 79. Goldman S, Copeland J, Morwitz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Ovitt T, Kern KB, Sethi G, Sharma GVRK, Khuri S, Richards K, Grover F, Morrison D, Whitman G, Chesler E, Sako Y, Pacold I, Montoya A, DeMots H, Floten S, Doherty J, Read R, Scott S, Spooner T, Masud Z, Haakenson C, Kim T, Harker L. Long-term graft patency (3 years) after coronary artery surgery: effects of aspirin: results of a VA cooperative study. Circulation. 1994;89:1138 –1143. 80. Stein PD, Dalen JE, Goldman S, Theroux P. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with saphenous vein and internal mammary artery bypass grafts. Chest. 1998;114(suppl 5):658S– 665S. 81. Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:129 –135. 82. Peto R, Gray R, Collins R, Wheatley K, Hennekens C, Jamrozik K, Warlow C, Hafner B, Thompson E, Norton S, Gilliland J, Doll R. Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors. BMJ. 1988;926:313–316. 83. Hennekens CH, Peto R, Hutchison GB, Doll R. An overview of the British and American aspirin studies. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:923–924. 84. The Medical Research Council’s General Practice Research Framework. Thrombosis Prevention Trial: randomised trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at increased risk. Lancet. 1998;351:233–241. 85. Kent KM, Rosing DR, Ewels CJ, Lipson L, Bonow R, Epstein SE. Prognosis of asymptomatic patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:1823–1831. 86. Ridker PM, Manson JE, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. Low-dose aspirin therapy for chronic stable angina: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:835– 839. 87. Juul-Möller S, Edvardson N, Jahnmatz B, Rosén A, Sorensen S, Ömblus R, for the Swedish Angina Pectoris Aspirin Trial (SAPAT) Group. Double-blind trial of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction in patients with stable chronic angina pectoris. Lancet. 1992; 340:1421–1425. 88. Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of aspirin use and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. JAMA. 1991;266: 521–527. 89. Buring JE, Hennekens CH, for The Women’s Health Study Research Group. The Women’s Health Study: summary of the study design. J Myocardial Ischemia. 1992;4:27–29. 90. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19,435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349:1569 –1581. 91. Chinese Acute Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349:1641–1649. 92. Sorensen PS, Pedersen H, Marquardsen J, Petersson H, Heltberg A, Simonsen N, Munck O, Andersen LA. Acetylsalicylic acid in the prevention of stroke in patients with reversible cerebral ischemic attacks: a Danish cooperative study. Stroke. 1983;14:15–21. 93. The Swedish Cooperative Study Group. High-dose acetylsalicylic acid after cerebral infarction: a Swedish cooperative study. Stroke. 1986;18: 325–334. 94. Bousser MG, Eschwege E, Haguenau M, Lefaucconnier JM, Thibult N, Touboul D, Touboul PJ. “AICLA” controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1983;14:5–10. 95. UK-TIA Study Group. United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: interim results. BMJ. 1988;296:316 –320. 96. Farrell B, Goodwin J, Richards S, Warlow C. The United Kingdom Transient Ischemia Attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 1991;54:1044 –1054. 97. The SALT Collaborative Group. Swedish Aspirin Low-dose Trial (SALT) of 75 mg aspirin as secondary prophylaxis after cerebrovascular ischaemic events. Lancet. 1991;338:1345–1349. 98. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group. A comparison of two doses of aspirin (30 mg vs 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1261–1266. 99. Tijssen JGP. Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid, with and without dipyridamole: a review of clinical trial results. Neurology. 1998;51(suppl 3):S15–S16. 100. Côté R, Battista RN, Abrahamowicz M, Langlois Y, Bourque F, Mackey A, and the Asymptomatic Cervical Bruit Study Group. Lack of effect of aspirin in asymptomatic patients with carotid bruits and substantial carotid narrowing. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:649 – 655. 101. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B. Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation: the Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet. 1989;1:175–179. 102. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study: final results. Circulation. 1991;84:527–539. 103. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study Group. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Lancet. 1993;342:1255–1262. 104. Diener HC, Cunha L, Forbes C, Sivenius J, Smets P, Lowenthal A. European Stroke Prevention Study 2: dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J Neurol Sci. 1996;143:1–13. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Awtry and Loscalzo 105. Laupacis A, Albers G, Dalen J, Dun MI, Jacobson AK, Singer DE. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1998;114(suppl 5):579S–589S. 106. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet. 1994;343:687– 691. 107. Gullov AL, Koefeod BG, Petersen P, Pedersen TS, Andersen ED, Godtfredsen J, Boysen G. Fixed minidose warfarin and aspirin alone in combination vs adjusted-dose warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1513–1521. 108. Dyken ML, Barnett HJM, Easton D, Fields WS, Fuster V, Hachinski V, Norris JW, Sherman DG. Low-dose aspirin and stroke: “It ain’t necessarily so.” Stroke. 1992;23:1395–1399. 109. Patrono C, Roth GJ. Aspirin in ischemic cerebrovascular disease: how strong is the case for a different dosing regimen? Stroke. 1996;27: 756 –760. 110. Taylor DW, Barnett HJM, Haynes RB, Ferguson GG, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Simard D, Silver FL, Hachinski V, Clagett GP, Barnes R, Spence JD. Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:2179 –2184. 111. van Gijn J. Low doses of aspirin in stroke prevention. Lancet. 1999; 353:2172–2173. 112. Roderick PJ, Wilkes HC, Meade TW. The gastrointestinal toxicity of aspirin: an overview of randomised controlled trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;35:219 –226. 113. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlöf B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, Ménard J, Rahn KH, Wedel H, Westerling S. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet. 1998;351:1755–1762. 114. He J, Whelton PK, Vu B, Klag MJ. Aspirin and risk of hemorrhagic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1998; 280:1930 –1935. 115. Sandler DP, Burr FR, Weinberg CR. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk for chronic renal disease [see comments]. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:165–172. 116. Patrono C, Dunn MJ. The clinical significance of inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis. Kidney Int. 1987;32:1–12. 117. Mene P, Pugliese F, Patrono C. The effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on human hypertensive vascular disease. Semin Nephrol. 1995;15:244 –252. 118. Riegger GA, Kahles HW, Elsner D, Kromer EP, Kochsiek K. Effects of acetylsalicylic acid on renal function in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Med. 1991;90:571–575. 119. Hall D, Zeitler H, Rudolph W. Counteraction of the vasodilator effects of enalapril by aspirin in severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1549 –1555. 120. Al-Khadra AS, Salem DN, Rand WM, Udelson JE, Smith JJ, Konstam MA. Antiplatelet agents and survival: a cohort analysis from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:419 – 425. 121. Spaulding C, Charbonnier B, Cohen-Solal A, Julliere Y, Kromer EP, Benhamda K, Cador R, Weber S. Acute hemodynamic interaction of aspirin and ticlopidine with enalapril: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative trial. Circulation. 1998;98:757–765. 122. Oosterga M, Anthonio RL, de Kam P-J, Kingma JH, Crijns H, van Gilst WH. Effects of aspirin on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and left ventricular dilation one year after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:1178 –1181. 123. Nawarskas JJ, Spinler SA. Does aspirin interfere with the therapeutic efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension or congestive heart failure? Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18:1041–1052. 124. Samter M, Beers RF. Intolerance to aspirin: clinical studies and consideration of its pathogenesis. Ann Intern Med. 1968;68:975–983. 125. Lee TH. Mechanism of aspirin sensitivity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992; 145:S34 –S36. 126. Keimowitz RM, Pulvermacher G, Mayo G, Fitzgerald DJ. Aspirin and platelets: transdermal modification of platelet function: a dermal aspirin preparation selectively inhibits platelet cyclooxygenase and preserves prostacyclin biosynthesis. Circulation. 1993;88:556 –561. 127. Jaszewski R. Frequency of gastroduodenal lesions in asymptomatic patients on chronic aspirin or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12:10 –13. Aspirin 1217 128. Savon JJ, Allen ML, DiMarino AJ Jr, Hermann GA, Krum RP. Gastrointestinal blood loss with low dose (325 mg) plain and enteric-coated aspirin administration. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:581–585. 129. Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Jurgelon JM, Sheehan J, Koff RS, Shapiro S. Risk of aspirin-associated major upper-gastrointestinal bleeding with enteric-coated or buffered product. Lancet. 1996;348:1413–1416. 130. Hawthorne AB, Mahida YR, Cole AT, Hawkey CJ. Aspirin-induced gastric mucosal damage: prevention by enteric-coating and relation to prostaglandin synthesis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;32:77– 83. 131. Stampfer MJ, Jakubowski JA, Deykin D, Schafer AI, Willett WC, Hennekens CH. Effect of alternate-day regular and enteric-coated aspirin on platelet aggregation, bleeding time, and thromboxane A2 levels in bleeding-time blood. Am J Med. 1986;81:400 – 404. 132. Meade EA, Smith WL, DeWitt DL. Differential inhibition of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase (cyclooxygenase) isozymes by aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Biol Chem. 1993;268: 6610 – 6614. 133. DeWitt DL, Meade EA, Smith WL. PGH synthase isoenzyme selectivity: the potential for safer non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med. 1993;95(suppl 2A):40S– 44S. 134. Kalgutkar AS, Crews BC, Rowlinson SW, Garner C, Seibert K, Marnett LJ. Aspirin-like molecules that covalently inactivate cyclooxygenase-2. Science. 1998;280:1268 –1270. 135. Lanza FL. Gastrointestinal toxicity of newer nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1318 –1323. 136. Roth SH, Tindall EA, Jain AK, McMahan FG, April PA, Bockow BI, Cohen SB, Fleischmann RM. A controlled study comparing the effects of nabumetone, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen plus misoprostol on the upper gastrointestinal tract mucosa. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2565–2571. 137. Johnson SA, Leib MS, Forrester SD, Marini M. The effect of misoprostol on aspirin-induced gastroduodenal lesions in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 1995;9:32–38. 138. Bowersox TS, Lipowitz AJ, Hardy RM, Johnston GR, Hayden DW, Schwartz S, King VL. The use of a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog as a gastric protectant against aspirin-induced hemorrhage in the dog. J Am Animal Hosp Assoc. 1996;32:401– 407. 139. Lanza FL, Kochman RL, Geis GS, Rack EM, Deysach LG. A doubleblind, placebo-controlled, 6-day evaluation of two doses of misoprostol in gastroduodenal mucosal protection against damage from aspirin and effect on bowel habits. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1743–1748. 140. Takeuchi K, Yasuhiro T, Asada Y, Sugawa Y. Role of nitric oxide in pathogenesis of aspirin-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Digestion. 1998;59:298 –307. 141. Takeuchi K, Ukawa H, Konaka A, Kitamura M, Sugawa Y. Effect of nitric oxide-releasing aspirin derivative on gastric functional and ulcerogenic responses in rats: comparison with plain aspirin. J Pharm Exp Ther. 1998;286:115–121. 142. Wallace JL, McKnight W, Del Soldato P, Baydoun AR, Cirino G. Anti-thrombotic effects of a nitric oxide-releasing, gastric-sparing aspirin derivative. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2711–2718. 143. Ukawa H, Yamakuni H, Kato S, Takeuchi K. Effects of cyclooxygenase-2 selective and nitric oxide-releasing nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on mucosal ulcerogenic and healing responses of the stomach. Digest Dis Sci. 1998;43:2003–2011. 144. Helgason CM, Tortorice KL, Winkler SR, Penney DW, Schuler JJ, McClelland TJ, Brace LD. Aspirin response and failure in cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1993;24:345–350. 145. Helgason CM, Bolin KM, Hoff JA, Winkler SR, Mangat A, Tortorice KL, Brace LD. Development of aspirin resistance in persons with previous ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:2331–2336. 146. Weber AA, Zimmermann KC, Meyer-Kirchrath J, Schrör K. Cyclooxygenase-2 in human platelets as a possible factor in aspirin resistance. Lancet. 1999;353:900. Letter. 147. Folts JD, Schafer AL, Loscalzo J, Willerson JT, Muller JE. A perspective on the potential problems with aspirin as an antithrombotic agent: a comparison of studies in an animal model with clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:295–303. 148. Sharis PJ, Cannon CP, Loscalzo J. The antiplatelet effects of ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:394 – 405. 149. Gent M, Blakely JA, Easton JD. The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in thromboembolic stroke. Lancet. 1989;1:1215–1220. 150. Hass WK, Easton D, Adams HP, Pryse-Phillips W, Molony BA, Anderson S, Kamm B, for the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group. A randomized trial comparing ticlopidine hydrochloride with aspirin for Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 1218 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. Circulation March 14, 2000 the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 1989;321: 501–507. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348:1329 –1339. FitzGerald GA. Dipyridamole. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1247–1257. The PARIS Research Group. The Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study (PARIS). Circulation. 1980;62(suppl V):V-85–V-87. The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:956 –961. The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1689 –1696. The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1997;96:1445–1453. The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade: the EPISTENT Investigators: Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting. Lancet. 1998;352:87–92. Hamm CW, Heeschen C, Glodman B, Vahanian A, Adgey J, Miguel CM, Rutsch W, Berger J, Kootstra J, Simoons M. Benefit of abciximab in patients with refractory unstable angina in relation to serum troponin levels. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1623–1629. Schulman SP, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Topol E, Califf RM, Navetta FI, Willerson JT, Chandra NC, Guerci AD, Ferguson JJ, Harrington RA, Lincoff AM, Yakubov SJ, Bray PF, Bahr RD, Wolfe CL, Yock PG, Anderson HV, Nygaard TW, Mason SJ, Effron MB, Fatterpacker A, Raskin S, Smith J, Brashears L, Gottdiener P, du Mee C, Kitt MM, Gerstenblith G. Myocardial ischemia/coronary artery vasoconstriction/ thrombosis/myocardial infarction: effects of Integrelin, a platelet glyco- 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. protein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, in unstable angina: a randomized multicenter trial. Circulation. 1996;94:2083–2089. The PRISM Investigators. A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina: the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1498 –1505. The PRISM-PLUS Investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non–Q-wave myocardial infarction: the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:1488 –1497. Marciniak TA, Ellerbeck EF, Radford MJ, Kresowik TF, Gold JA, Krumholz HM, Kiefe CI, Allman RM, Vogel RA, Jencks SF. Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA. 1998;279:1315–1317. Krumholtz HM, Philbin DM Jr, Wang Y, Vaccarino V, Murillo JE, Therrien ML, Williams J, Radford MJ. Trends in the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries admitted to the hospital with unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:957–963. Shahar E, Folsom AR, Romm FJ, Bisgard KM, Metcalf PA, Crum L, McGovern PG, Hutchinson RG, Heiss G. Patterns of aspirin use in middle-aged adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Heart J. 1996;131:915–922. Bowker TJ, Clayton TC, Ingham J, McLennan NR, Hobson HL, Pyke SD, Schofield B, Wood DA. A British Cardiac Society survey of the potential for the secondary prevention of coronary disease: ASPIRE (Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events). Heart. 1996;75:334 –342. Aronow WS. Underutilization of aspirin in older patients with prior myocardial infarction at the time of admission to a nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:615– 616. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015 Aspirin Eric H. Awtry and Joseph Loscalzo Circulation. 2000;101:1206-1218 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.10.1206 Circulation is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/10/1206 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation is online at: http://circ.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/ Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 26, 2015