Education Research and Quality
SESSION TITLE: Education, Research, and Quality Improvement 1
SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Posters
PRESENTED ON: 10/10/2018 01:00 pm - 02:00 pm
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION IN THE ICU
BOBBIE ANN WHITE EDD, MA* TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER
CHRISTIE BLEDSOE RANDY HENDRICKS AND ALEJANDRO ARROLIGA
PURPOSE: A conflict management education intervention was created for the ICU team (physicians, nurses, respiratory
therapists, and advanced practitioners). The objectives were 1) teach about “diagnosing” conflict type and cause; 2) recognize
internal dialogue; 3) introduce conflict management modes used in conflict situations; and 4) develop self and other awareness.
RESULTS: Three data points were collected from 56 participants, which led to different sample sizes for each analysis. Pre posttest analysis had 45 participants and the Thomas-Kilmann descriptive statistics had 49 participants. In the pre posttest
experimental group (n-31), knowledge post-tests had a higher average of 6.42(sd ¼ 1.232) compared to 3.61(sd ¼ 1.407), which
was an increase following the conflict management intervention (t(30) ¼ 8.204, p < .001). Perception scores were also
significantly different (t(30 ¼ - 3.145, p ¼.004). The largest portion of participants had avoiding conflict management mode
(31.6%) as a top choice, followed by compromising (29.8%), accommodating (24.6%), collaborating (8.8%), and competing
(5.3%). Aspects of the intervention that participants indicated would stay with them were the Thomas-Kilmann conflict
management modes, and better awareness of others; one participant stated their take away from the session was “being more
mindful of different perspectives”. Finally, the more diverse the group participants were, the richer the perception and perspective
dialogues during the educational sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: The conflict management educational intervention improved the participants’ knowledge and had an effect on
perceptions. Qualitative data suggests ICU participants were interested in concrete information that will help with conflict
resolution, and some participants understood that mindfulness and awareness would improve professional interactions or reduce
conflict.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Educational contact time should not be spent rehashing the importance of conflict management.
Instead, medical professionals should explore team perceptions and practice resolution skills. A specific clinical implication was
the finding that the most common conflict management modes were avoiding and compromising both of which do not yield the
best outcomes in conflict. Also of note, the competing mode was least preferred, so it may be advisable to coach staff on how to
compete in a healthy way as the competing mode is needed for situations such as fighting for a specific treatment for an acutely ill
patient.
DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Alejandro Arroliga, source¼Web Response
No relevant relationships by Christie Bledsoe, source¼Web Response
No relevant relationships by Randy Hendricks, source¼Web Response
No relevant relationships by Bobbie Ann White, source¼Web Response
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.492
Copyright ª 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
chestjournal.org
545A
EDUCATION RESEARCH AND QUALITY
METHODS: Quantitative analysis was used to evaluate pre and post knowledge and perceptions of conflict, descriptive statistics
to investigate the participants’ chosen conflict management mode, and qualitative analysis to evaluate three open-ended questions
on the post-test.