Correspondence
M. F. KARIU, M.D., F.R.C.R., PH.D.
Academisch Ziekenhuis
Vrije Universiteit
Department of Radiation Oncology
1007 MB Amsterdam. The Netherlands
A. B.
1. Parsons, J. T.; Mendenhall, W. M.; Stringer, S. P.; Cassisi, N. J.;
Million, R. R. Salvage surgery following radiation failure in squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol.
Biol. Phys. 32605~609; 1995.
2. Karim, A. 8. M. F.; Kralendonk, J. H.; Njo, K. H.; Tierie, A.
H.; Hasman, A. Radiation therapy for advanced (T3T4N~N3MO)
laryngeal carcinoma: The need for a change of strategy: A radiother
apeutic viewpoint. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 13: 1625- 1633;
198-l.
971
complete response after 5 weeks should be considered for elective surgery, even if they subsequently do achieve complete response.
We would be most interested to learn if Jaulerry et a!. ‘s patients who
exhibited complete response after 5 weeks had an outcome appreciably
better than those who achieved complete response at a later time also.
BHADRASAIN
VIKRAM,
M.D.
Department of Radiation Oncology
Montefiore Medical Center
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
It I East 210th St.
Bronx, NY 10467
1. Jaulerry, C.; Dubray, B.; Bmnin, F.; et aI. Prognostic value of
tumor regression during mdi~r~y
for head and neck cancer: A
prospective study. Int. J. Radiat. OncoI. Biol. Phys. 33(2):271279;
1995.
V&ram. B.: Mahunud. S.: Gold. J.: Nussbaum. M.: Kimmelman,
C.; Lucente, F.; Pa&m, W.; P&h, J.; Chad& M.; Beattie, E.
Chemotherapy rapidly alternating with accelerated radiotherapy for
advanced carcinomas of the hypopharynx and upper esophagus: A
feasibility study. Head Neck 13:415-419; 199 I.
3 Yu, L.; Vikram, B.; MaJamud, S.; Yudetman, 1.; Nussbaum, M.;
Beattie, E. Chemotherapy rapidly alternating with twice-a&y accelerated radiation therapy in carcinomas involving the hypopharynx or esophagus: An update. Cancer Invest. 13567-572; 1995.
2.
IN RB%‘ONSE
TO DR. KARIM
To rhe Editor:
Dr. Karim has directed our attention to several papers
(a few of which were aheady cited in our paper) that address the efficacy
of salvage surgery following failure of irradiation to control supraglottic
laryngeal cancer. Most of the papers include a sentence or two, or at
best, a paragraph or table, detailing the control rates after salvage surgery. Little or no mention is usually made in these papers of the number
of patients who experienced failure, the number of salvage procedures
performed, the reasons for exclusion from surgical salvage, the length
of follow-up after “successful” surgicaJ salvage, the 5-year survival
pmbabili~ after surgery, the difficulties encountered in obtaining a positive biopsy after high-dose irradiation, the anatomic sites of failure after
salvage surgery, tumor control results according to status of surgical
margins, rates of salvage according to time to local failure, or how the
neck was treated, Our statement that “most series contain few details
of the subsequent clinical course of patients whose primary cancer was
not controlled by irradiation” is accurate (Dr. Karim slightly misquoted
our statement in the first paragraph of his Letter to the Editor). Incomplete reporting of the test&s of salvage treatment is common not only
to supraglottic laryngeal cancer but to a number of other primary tumor
sites as well.
JAMES T. PARSONS, M.D.
WILLIAM
M. ME~DE~HALL,
M.D.
Department of Radiation Oncology
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, FL 32610-0385
PROGNOSTIC
VALUE OF TLIMOR REGRESSION DURING
RADWFEEMPY
OR CVOTHRRAPY
FOR
ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK CANCERS: RRGARDING
JAULERRY ET AL. IJROBF 33(2):271-279;
1995
IN RESPONSE
TO DR. VWRAM
To the E&oc We thank Dr. V&ram for his intereat in our pmapective
study of tumor regression during exclusive tadifor head and
neck cancer f 1). We are pleased to answer his question regarding a
possible difference in outcome for the patients achieving a complete
tumor regression either at week 5 of irradiation (CR,) or at the end of
treatment (CR.,).
Our total study population comprised 228 Tl-T4 patients. Among
them, 29 had CR, and 94 experienced CR., after incomplete response
at 5 weeks. The actuarial pmbabihties of loco-regional control at 2 years
were 93% and 73% respectively (p logrank = 0.06). When the analysis
was limited to T3-T4 patients, 5 CR5 and 30 CR, were recorded.
The 2-year loco-regionaJ control probabiiities were tOO% and 64%,
respectively, and the difference was not significant fp logrank = 0.5).
We also looked at the T3-T4 patients who achieved a major response
at 5 weeks fz 75% in volume, FAR,) or at the comber
d therapy
(UK,).
The Z-year loco-regionaJ control agilities
were 75 ( 5 1
MR,) and 49% (47 ML)
with a p value of 0.06.
Consistent with Dr. Vikram’s observation, our data suggest a trend
towards better outcome for the patients experiencing an early response
(either CR or MR) to exclusive radiotherapy. However, statistical significance was never reached, although borderhne p values were obtained.
This may be due to the low statistical power resuhing from the small
patient numbers. The early delivery of chemotherapy in Dr. V&ram‘s
patients may have also contributed to the seiection of patients witb
better prognostic features.
M.D.*
CHRISTEAN JAULERRY,
To zhe .&&or: Jaulerry et al. ( 1) report an interesting study wherein
tumor regression after 5 weeks of treatment by exclusive irradiation
correlated well with fang-term Philip
of local control in cancers of
the head and neck. We have noted a similar fmding in our study of
rapidly ahernating c~mor~o~y
for advanced squamous cell carcinomas involving the hypopharynx. The details have been published
elsewhere (2, 3) but briefly the treatment consisted of chemotherapy
(cisplatin and 5 fluorouracil) during weeks 1, 4 and 7, alternating with
n&therapy (2 Gy twice daily) during weeks 2,5 and 8. Eighty-seven
oercent of the natients had T3T4.70% had N2N3. and 83% had Stage
iV disease. R&me
was assessedweekly during treatment by physic2
examination including fiberoptic laryngoscopy.
Of 20 evaluable patients, 12 exhibited complete response after 5
weeks of treatment, 4 exhibited complete response at a later time, and
4 never achieved complete response. Subsequently, local-regional recurrence was obsened in $j (8%), i (75%), and f (lOtI%), respectively.
of Local-regional control at 2 years was 86%
among the p&eats who exhibited complete response after 5 weeks of
~a~~
and only 14% among those who did not (p = 0.03). The
data suggest that patients treated in this manner who do not achieve
BERNARD
DUBRAY,
M.D.*
V~~RONIQUE
MOSSERI.
M.D.’
FRANQXSE
BRUNIN,
M.D.*
Josl
RODRIGUEZ,
M.D.$
DANIEL
POINT, M.D.”
BRIGITE
BLASZKA,
BERNARII
ASSELAIN,
M.D.*
M.D.’
JACQUES BRUGBRE, M.D.’
JEAN-MARC
COSSET, M.D.*
*Department of Radiotherapy
’ Department of Biostatistics
iDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery
Institut Curie
75231 Paris Cedex OS. France
1. Jaulerry, C.; Dubray, B.; Brunin, F.; Rodriguez, J.; Point, D.; Blaszka, B.; Asselain, B.; Mosseri. V.; Brt@m, J.; Cosset, J.-M. Prognostic value of tumor regression during my
for head and
neck cancer: A prospective study. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 33{2):2?1-279; 1995.