Academia.eduAcademia.edu

CFP: New Perspectives on Bob Dylan and the Blues (Edited Volume)

2024

AI-generated Abstract

This edited volume invites chapter proposals that critically re-evaluate Bob Dylan's engagement with the blues, challenging traditional depictions of both Dylan and the blues as apolitical. By integrating perspectives from music critics, podcasters, and fans, the collection aims to rethink the significance of the blues in Dylan's artistry and its broader political context, emphasizing a poststructuralist understanding of intertextuality and the socio-economic conversations within musical traditions.

A World Unknown: New Perspectives on Bob Dylan and the Blues (Edited Volume) Deadline for abstract submissions: September 15, 2024 Editors: David Polanski (Independent Scholar) & Robert Reginio (Alfred University) Contact email: [email protected] Project Introduction In the spring of 1963, Bob Dylan released The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan, an album whose compositions infused traditional folk and blues motifs with piercing political commentary, surrealist imagery, and wry humor, while simultaneously gesturing toward yet-invented forms of songwriting capable of critiquing the novel modes of political power that emerged in the wake of WWII. That fall, LeRoi Jones (Amiri Baraka) published Blues People, a work of revisionist historiography that not only challenged bourgeois conceptions of the blues as a passive, politically unthreatening reaction to historical trauma, but recast the blues as a proactive response to postbellum economic uncertainty and the pressure placed upon black communities to assimilate into the “Euro-American humanist façade” (Jones 171). Just as Dylan’s engagement with the blues was experimental in nature (rejecting the crude combination of reverence and paternalism that marked the folk and blues revivals), Baraka viewed the blues as a “kinetic,” “self-refining” art form, one whose most direct descendants could be identified not in the commercialized, minstrelized sounds of rock n’ roll, but in the exploratory realms of be-bop and avant-garde “jazz,” as well as within then-nascent forms of Black Nationalism (Jones 235, 220). Today, large swaths of academia dismiss Baraka’s revisionist arguments (with scholars clinging to an arrested, almost afro-pessimist image of the blues tradition), and within the field of Dylan studies critics dutifully depict Dylan’s intertextual engagement with the blues not as a process of critical experimentation (as a means “of inventing in the style of the past with an eye toward new historical conjunctures”), but as acts of depoliticized nostalgia or reactionary nationalism (Reed 10). This collection of essays seeks to challenge such positions, rejecting all notions of the blues as a fundamentally emotive and functionally apolitical tradition, while embracing instead Dylan and Baraka’s original intent with regard to the critical, political, and artistic potential of the blues form. We envision a volume that will serve not only as a resource for scholars, but as a model for music critics, podcasters, and fans eager to explore new ways of articulating the political and aesthetic salience of the blues and of Dylan’s artistry. We are seeking chapter proposals of 300-500 words. Proposals may address, but are not limited to, the following topics: -A critical re-evaluation of scholarly publications that have explored Dylan’s relationship to the blues, one which identifies long-term trends within Dylan studies, examines insights, innovations, errors, and contradictions within individual texts, and proposes theoretical and historiographical avenues in need of further exploration. -A revisionist study of Dylan’s intertextual relationship with traditional blues lyrics, themes, and motifs, one that jettisons the self-limiting conception of “intertextuality” popular among Dylan scholars (wherein the focus is placed almost entirely on instances in which Dylan directly and consciously repurposes passages from pre-existing texts), and incorporates instead a broader, poststructuralist understanding of Dylan’s compositions “as teeming crossroads populated” not merely by identifiable, pre-existing creative works, but by a multitude of millennia-old tropes and motifs, all of which are engaged in “an intertextual, as well as socioeconomic, set of conversations” that transgress geographic, chronological, and linguistic barriers, and occur independent of authorial intent (Hogle 12). -A critique of the myriad variations of the blues aesthetic that have been constructed by Dylan and his studio collaborators over the decades, one that considers both the aural nature of Dylan’s recordings and the visual presentation of Dylan’s records in relation to earlier blues recordings (for example, Blonde on Blonde as a reimagining of the “Chicago” blues, or Oh Mercy and Time Out of Mind as an interpretation of “delta” or “swamp” blues). -A study of Dylan’s relationship to the blues tradition from a performance standpoint, with possible consideration given to Dylan’s myriad blues- and jazz-inspired stylings as a guitarist, pianist, vocalist, and harmonica player, to Dylan’s discussion in 2004’s Chronicles of the techniques supposedly taught to him by Lonnie Johnson, or to the blues-inspired stylings and techniques of Dylan’s most notable collaborators (e.g. Joan Baez, Mike Bloomfield, The Band, the various mainstays on the “Never Ending Tour”) -An exploration of the relationship between the blues tradition and the gothic, and/or of Dylan's often-intertwined engagements with gothic and blues tropes and motifs. -An eco-critical examination of Dylan’s “flood songs” (e.g. 1967’s “Crash on the Levee,” 2001’s “High Water,” 2006’s “The Levee’s Gonna Break”), and/or of the genre of pre-WWII blues “disaster songs” that inspired Dylan’s compositions, that considers such expressions in relation to historical events (e.g. The Mississippi Flood of 1927, Hurricane Katrina), historical trends or theoretical epochs related to climate change (e.g. the “Anthropocene,” the “Capitalocene,” the “Great Acceleration”), or to recent developments in eco-critical theory. -An exploration of the discordant relationship between Eric Lott's concept of "love and theft" in 1994's Love and Theft: Blackface Minstrelsy and the American Working Class and the more informal usage of the term "love and theft" within Dylan studies and fandom (a term commonly employed by Dylan scholars and fans to describe instances in which Dylan repurposes passages from identifiable, pre-existing literary texts, regardless of whether or not such instances are associated with minstrelsy). -An examination of the racial politics of the various artistic movements with which Dylan has historically been associated, including, but not limited to the folk "revival" of the early 1960s, the "Beat generation," or the musical genres of “blues-rock,” “alt-country,” and “Christian rock.” Such an examination would explore questions of appropriation and minstrelsy and would consider these artistic movements (and Dylan’s relationship to them) in light of relevant historical and theoretical contexts. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions, and best wishes! Works Cited Leroi Jones (Amiri Baraka), Blues People: Negro Music in White America (New York: Harper Perennial, 2002). Anthony Reed, Soundworks: Race, Sound, and Poetry in Production (Durham: Duke UP, 2021). Jerrold E. Hogle, “The Progress of Theory and the Study of the American Gothic,” in Charles L. Crow, ed., A Companion to American Gothic (West Sussex: Wiley & Sons, 2014).