Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Corporate Elites and the reform of public education

2017, Educational review

Educational Review ISSN: 0013-1911 (Print) 1465-3397 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cedr20 Corporate elites and the reform of public education Stephen J. Ball To cite this article: Stephen J. Ball (2017): Corporate elites and the reform of public education, Educational Review, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2017.1375808 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1375808 Published online: 25 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 26 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cedr20 Download by: [Gothenburg University Library] Date: 06 October 2017, At: 04:36 EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1375808 BOOK REVIEW Downloaded by [Gothenburg University Library] at 04:36 06 October 2017 Corporate elites and the reform of public education, edited by Helen M. Gunter, David Hall and Michael W. Apple, Bristol, Policy Press, 2017, 296 pp., £64 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-4473-2680-9 It is only recently that we have seen education policy researchers begin to turn their focus of attention away from governments and bureaucracies as the be all and end all of the education policy process to explore the role of other actors – businesses, foundations, think tanks – in the formation, writing and delivery of education policy and the reform of education. This book is a decisive and important contribution to that change of focus. It does several things. It moves away from what Ulrich Beck calls “methodological nationalism” (Beck 2007) to highlight the increasingly complex spatial distribution and mobility of policies, although one or two papers still frame their analysis entirely within the national. It also explores the increasingly significant role of global corporations and corporate actors in both framing the possibilities and necessities of education reform and “re-thinking” the narrative of what it means to be educated and the meaning of education. It points up what Janine Wedel calls the “coincidence of interests” (Wedel 2009) that bring together the needs of governments, the processes of education reform and opportunities for profit and it shows the way in which new business opportunities are being opened up by the re-making of the classroom as a site for the production of student performances. Indeed, reading across the papers it adumbrates the key role of the digitalisation of education in the articulation between new forms of pedagogy, the de-professionalisation of teachers and furtherance of global financial interests. Overall, the most significant contribution of the collection is that it offers both a global overview of trends in education policy and some analysis of these, alongside a number of variously deep and detailed case studies of actually existing corporatisation of education, such as the chapters by Saltman on Amplify, Burch on Inbloom, Duggan on Teach First and Frontline, Gunter on consultancy, and Schirmer and Apple on the Koch brothers and state education policies in the US. All too many policy analysts are content to present us with hyperbolic sketches of corporate interventions into education policy and delivery without grounding these in properly worked examples and case studies; we may glean some sense of what is going on from these sketches, but never get a real grasp of how corporate aspirations translate into changes in the educational experiences of young people. What is needed is a clear understanding of the “who, what and where” of corporatisation, and these papers do very good work in providing that. Ultimately you cannot properly consider, question, critique and oppose or reject abstract processes. The last two papers in the book directly address the question of speaking back to corporate power. Perhaps one small worry about the collection is that, with a couple of exceptions – Prosser on Argentina, Gaus and Hall on Indonesia – the book is predominantly concerned with the north and the west, and is mainly, by definition, about the big global business players. There are now tens of thousands of small and medium edu-business start-ups in South Asia, India and parts of Africa, many of them focusing on profits at “the bottom of the pyramid”, that play their part in re-working the global landscape of educational provision and experience, supplementing, competing with or displacing state provision and driving the shift from bureaucratic government to heterarchical governance. 2 BOOK REVIEW Like most collections this book seeks to hold together a diverse set of papers around its theme and there are various degrees of slippage from the primary focus, but the opening and concluding chapters do useful work in pulling together the issues that cut across the different contributions. The idea of a “corporate elite” is interpreted differently across the volume: some papers emphasise the role of corporations in education delivery and policy, while others concern themselves with the reproduction of elites of various sorts. There are also inherent conceptual problems involved in distinguishing “the elite” from other relatively advantaged groups, and in identifying the commonalities and differences between elites of different kinds. Nonetheless, this collection offers a range of insightful perspectives on contemporary trends in education policy that are coherent and pressing. Downloaded by [Gothenburg University Library] at 04:36 06 October 2017 References Beck, U. 2007. Cosmopolitanism. Accessed via Ulrich Beck online website: http://www.ulrichbeck.net-build.net/ index.php?page=cosmopolitan Wedel, J. R. 2009. Shadow Elite: How the World’s New Power Brokers Undermine Democracy. New York: Basic Books. Stephen J Ball Institute of Education, University College London [email protected] © 2017 Stephen J Ball https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1375808