Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2024, 4IP Group Presentation 01.02.2024
…
76 pages
1 file
❖ How philanthropy in Africa could develop in the coming decade and ❖ Why this matters! ❖ How do impact investors work with non-profits? ❖ Philanthro-Capitalism. ❖ The Social Finance Landscape. ❖ The Origins and Expansion of Impact Investing in Western Africa. ❖ Supply of social investment in WEST AFRICA. ❖ Who are the major impact investors in Western Africa? ❖ DFI ❖ Non-DFI (SFMs) ❖ Foundations ❖ Faith-based organizations ❖ The Case for Faith-based Impact Investment. ❖ A few conclusions and policyrecommendations.
PIC, Impact Investing South Africa & GSGII, 2019
The African Impact Report 2019 is a catalyst for collaborative coordination amongst global stakeholders to fast track sustainable and scalable solutions for Africa’s prioritized impact needs. This working paper presents a summary of impact investment-related information, research and recommendations from a range of government and private sector sources. It presents a baseline of the progress pertaining to the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals and the African Union (AU) Agenda 2063, macroeconomic growth prospects, capital availability and sector opportunities. It further outlines gaps which require a collaborative effort to address in order to ensure the much needed outcomes for the African continent is achieved. Further work will be done to identify solutions to these gaps to ensure Impact Investors into Africa can appropriately benchmark their return, risk and impact requirements.
Journal article, 2016
This paper frames social finance in its broadest terms as an alternative to traditional corporate responsible practice, highlighting the significance and potential of social finance in mobilising financial resources for global social development. This paper explains social finance as an approach employing financial resources drawn from "the market" to generate positive social impacts which can, depending on instruments, also deliver financial returns. Despite hitherto forms of capitalism generating economic asymmetry, there is an urgent need for a more equitable financial mobilisation through innovative finance. Such a need has generated a paradigm shift in the corporate sector where actors in the private sector are increasingly using a variety of instruments to utilise private money for public good - social finance. We have so far seen corporate responsible business practices, yet with innovation and multi-sectoral partnerships, it can potentially bring the most significant change that has yet to be witnessed globally.
Report, 2021
This report focuses on the latent potential and essentials of impact investing. It is an emerging, innovative form of SDGs investment for realization of the SDGs in ASEAN. Impact investing is distinct in its intentionality in creating and measuring societal impact along with financial return, beyond mitigating risk and incorporating factors related to environment, society and governance (ESG). This report aims to further mobilize financial resources that can be measured in terms of both financial and societal performance to accelerate realization of the SDGs, as part of the “Decade of Action”.
ISIRC-MILAN, Proceedings, EGEA, 2022 , 2022
This paper aims to identify key topics that an equity capital provider with an investment focus on for-profit businesses shall consider while defining an impact investing strategy. Critical questions stand at the origin of this research, such as how can investors combine financial return and impact return? More specifically, what topics take priority when designing an impact investing strategy? To catalyse resources from different kinds of potential impact investors, managers can design different strategies and can set up various forms of investment vehicles, such as venture capital funds or venture philanthropy organisations. The research methodology was based on empirical and qualitative analyses carried out during the period of 2019-2021. The research arrives at outcomes by testing empirical evidence by using qualitative methods such as of observations, assessing web-based data and information regarding key topics for impact investing strategies, organising one-to-one meetings, and networking during sector conferences. A selected panel of impact-investing players encompasses 96 players, including 79 impact capital fund and 17 network organisations. The funds selected are mainly registered in Europe, the USA, and the Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) region, but all predominantly invest in emerging and developing countries. Preference was given towards analysing the investment vehicles partnered with institutional investors, and which are therefore primarily committed to financial returns alongside a serious mandatory commitment to impact topics and measurable impact return. Publications, reports, and data provided by global networks of impact investors were taken into considerations, together alongside the review of the literature on impact investing and venture capital in emerging countries. The key topics identified as significant for outlining impact investing strategies are the following: theory of change; contribution to sustainable development goals; criteria to identify impact business models; capacity-building support to portfolio companies; geographic focus; thematic sectors; time horizon and exit strategy; methodology to measure and manage impact. In conclusion, the paper offers more guidance towards the question of how to code impact returns, as well as a good path towards addressing investors and investment managers to design impact investing strategies aimed to generate financial return while simultaneously serving the common good.
World Resources Institute
Mobilizing finance and multistakeholder partnerships are key priorities for the global community to accelerate the SDGs. Yet, many partnerships are not able to reach their ambitions because they cannot access early-stage financing. This report aims to help partnerships and their funders effectively manage and mobilize finance to achieve SDG impact by: exploring partnership funding challenges and lessons learned; examining innovative funding approaches; and providing tangible recommendations to partnerships and funders on how to drive SDG impact more effectively.
World Resources Institute
Private investments present a critical funding opportunity to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, due to the growing recognition that socially and environmentally responsible solutions can generate impacts and financial returns across the risk spectrum. Innovative new mobility solutions—especially when driven by impact-oriented investments and enabled by inclusive policies—can be part of the solution for sustainable and equitable transport. The research paper features key insights on impact-driven investments in new mobility enterprises in Kampala, Uganda, and Hyderabad, India. The paper highlights the current challenges to impact investing in mobility enterprises, including difficulties in accounting for impact, dilution of impact from other sectors, regulatory regimes and political risks that could hinder the running of mobility businesses, and entrenched stakeholders holding back investments. It concludes with opportunities to confront these challenges and pathways to safe...
Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management, 2020
In recent years, social finance has gathered significant, and increasingly global, scholarly and policy interest. This chapter provides a brief review of the concepts, history, forms, and policies related to social finance, with a primary focus on the United Kingdom and the United States. Debates around social finance are often focused on commercial or financial dimensions, in which nonprofits are typically not centrally involved. In this chapter, we focus on three key forms of social finance as examples to show how social finance benefits or engages with nonprofit organizations. The three forms of social finance are impact investing, social impact bonds, and crowdfunding, which all have advantages and barriers in serving nonprofits and social enterprises.
Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2023
The literature on Responsible Innovation (RI) has not yet fully addressed the role played by social finance (SF) in supporting projects and organizations engaged in the production of innovations that tackle grand societal challenges. This study addresses this gap by empirically examining how SF investors select potential investees and the principles they judge important in SF. Our findings show that SF investors apply a combination of criteria to select investment projects where entrepreneurial motivations, environmental, social and governance commitments, and the nature of the impacts being generated align with their portfolio's mission. Though not all SF investors in our sample had knowledge about the concept of responsibility, they nonetheless mobilized a broad set of principles that are closely aligned with the aims and practices of RI. More research is needed to clarify the type of resources SF use to support RI and the conditions under which these resources are provided.
Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space
With the growing global recognition that environmental and social crises are pushing systems of social and ecological reproduction to their breaking points, governments, philanthropists, and the private sector are proposing a variety of strategies that aim to shift the social and environmental role of finance capital from an extractive process to a reparative one. A frequent refrain is that only finance capital promises the scale of investment necessary to address Earth’s complex social and environmental problems, and that trillions of private investment dollars wait in the wings ready to mobilize for the right kinds of projects. A hallmark of these approaches is their promise of “triple bottom line” outcomes, with social, environmental, and financial benefits—what the industry refers to as “responsible investing.” This symposium interrogates the political dynamics and financial mechanisms underlying ongoing experiments in so-called responsible finance, including various forms of im...
Aalborg University, 2021
Purpose: This study aims to explore the characteristics behind an emerging impact investing marketplace in Denmark. This will be combined with examining related or- ganisational strategising within an institutional context of Danish development policy and strategy. Motivation(s): As an industrial PhD project, the research builds on a collaboration between four supporting project partners, the World Wildlife Fund Denmark, Dan- ish Red Cross, Access2innovation and Aalborg University, with the aim to shedding light on the opportunities in impact investing, related strategies, and the drivers behind investing for impact. The study has explored and supported project partners' impact investing-related strategising, through the research period from 2018 to 2021. Here project partners motivations guide the research aims to explore the emergence of impact investing in Denmark at an institutional level. This is combined with understanding project partners responses and related strategising, within the context of Danish development at an organisational level. Conceptual framework and research design: Impact investing is often referred to as an investment strategy with the intent to contribute to measurable social and environmental real-world outcomes, alongside a financial return.Overall, interest and activity around impact investing in Denmark have increased significantly in recent years. De- spite the enthusiasm, the emergence and characteristics of the impact investing mar- ketplace, combined with interpretations, motives and adoption of strategies, remain largely unexamined. To explore how impact investing is structured in Den- mark and explore project partners related strategising, this study presents a concep- tual framework combining institutional theory and strategy as practice theory. The framework becomes a lens to explore Danish-based interpretations, motives, and practice of impact investing, which is combined with project partners responses and strategising at an organisational level. Soft system methodology is applied as a research design to operationalise the conceptual framework, and combined with mixed methods to collect and interpret the primary data from 120 semi-structured interviews with Danish-based actors and project partners. Findings: The study provides research on the emerging characteristics of impact in- vesting in Denmark and individual actors related strategising. It examines the ena- bling role of public actors in the institutional context of Danish development. Findings show how public actors can (i) leverage financial investment with blended value, (ii) create incentives to (re)shape arrangements and (iii) promote legitimacy in investing for development. However, public actors could face tensions and trade-offs when promoting blended value that caters to institutional capital needs, while balancing investment logic and development objectives. The findings also provide empirical evidence on Danish financial interpreta- tions, motives, and practice with impact investing. The study derived the segmenta- tion of financial actors by categorising them according to their interpretations of impact investing and understandings of investing with impact. The segmentation shows how financial actors interpret and adopt different strategies depending on their organisational characteristics and institutional ends-means. On the one hand, one segment of actors (referred to as Type A actors, primarily con- sisting of asset owners and few managers) emphasises value-alignment (i.e., views im- pact investing as an extension of values) and/or impact-generating (i.e., aiming to generate or accelerate new projects or impacts) to bring about value-creation. The low prevalence of investment logic makes some actors open to new investment management practices, where institutional ends (values, motives, goals) govern their means (resources, practices, and investments) when adopting impact investing. On the other hand, a larger segment of financial actors (referred to as Type B and C actors, primarily consisting of asset managers and few owners) upholds moderate or high prevalence of investment logic. These actors adapt impact-aligned strategies by ensuring investments address broad social or environmental areas, where impact is complimentary to risk-return considerations. Similarly, actors have motives towards investing with impact, yet interpretation or adoption builds on experience from sustainable investing strategies or traditional investment practice. Furthermore, more complex institutional patterns are identified than currently rec- ognised by impact investing literature. Here, marketplace segmentation is discussed to better understand actors approaches to investing with impact through their ends-means, motives, and practices. This is combined with discussing a reconceptualisation of impact investing, from having one uniform definition to instead building a typology for how actors can invest with impact and address real-world issues. The study shares insight into project partners' motives, responses, and interactions shaping strategy-making at an organisational level. The study follows the World Wild-life Fund Denmark strategy-making on bankable nature-based solutions, Danish Red Cross commitment to innovative finance, and Access2innovation initiatives on impact financing. Findings are based on project partners strategy-making within im- pact investing related areas and underpin the emerging challenges when project part- ners seek to strategise or adopt a new practice outside core institutional means. This can, in some cases, lead to tensions between embedded practice and other strategic intentions. The findings from three different project partners describe the dynamic and continuous strategising as organisations seek to navigate an emerging field and engage in a new practice outside their traditional operations. The study showcases how actors can craft strategies and pathways to engage in related areas to impact investing through practice-driven learning to overcome organisational tensions or adopt a new practice. Contributions: In summary, the research provides empirical evidence on the emer- gence and development of impact investing in Denmark. By doing so, this study provides a segmentation of the marketplace to convene actors around shared motives to invest with impact and share insights into diverse pathways to engage in new practices.
Environmental health perspectives, 2014
Revista Rupturas, 2024
Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 2015
Neoliberal Düşünce Ekseninde ASEAN’ın Uluslararası Politik Ekonomisinin Analizi, 2024
Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, 2019
Escrituras digitales. Tecnologías de la creación en la era virtual, 2008
Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 2011
Physics Letters B, 1983
African Crop Science Journal, 2023
BMC Research Notes, 2019
La estética y el arte de la Academia a la Academia, 2016
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2018
Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 2008
World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2004