Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009, Focus Paper - Royal Higher Institure for Defence
…
16 pages
1 file
In this contribution, we will discuss developments in jihad ideology. First, we will take the reader on a journey back in time, to frame the origin of doctrines concerning jihad in classical Islam and the fundaments of Islamic law. Then, we will focus on the emergence of political Islam, its radicalisation and the new doctrines on jihad that it brought about. We will see how 'international jihad' emerged as a very special strain of radical political Islam, with al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden as its best known protagonists.
against it. What this essay is aimed for, is to introduce a vague term such as terrorism, the explanation of what Global Jihadism is and had supposed for those past years and the years to come, and of course, understand its evolution through history by assessing its origins, features, differences, objectives, aims, targets, actors, modus operandi and capacity.
2008
This thesis argues among other things, that the concept of jihad, which represents a form of striving and endeavour-often misinterpreted in the literature as 'holy war'-is rooted in the Qur'anic ideals and interpretations (ijtihad). However it can be extremely variable when 'applied' to Muslim societies in the course of history. Thus for example, the Greater and Lesser Jihads might be subject to a number of different interpretations when applied to Muslim societies deriving from (a) historical experiences and/or circumstances; (b) theological or philosophical debates; (c) differing religio-political elite formations; and (d) strategic assessments of threats and /or dangers to Islam. We demonstrate the multifaceted and variable characteristics of jihad through the use of a 'Jihadist Wheel'. In the case of modern jihadist organizations, which we examine, reference to the Qur'an as a source of ideological guidance and inspiration has some 1
the 1st Raden Intan International Conference on Muslim Societies and Social Sciences (RIICMuSSS 2019), 2020
This paper aims to criticize the religious understanding that becomes the basis of argumentation for radical Islamic movements. This study focuses on studying important issues about jihad (martyrdom) which were often misunderstood by the radical groups. Using a historical approach, it traces the historical roots of radicalism in Islam, examines its re-emergence in the modern time, and explore the basic characters of both classical and modern Islamic radicalism. This paper also uses a doctrinal-normative approach, focusing on verses of the Qur'an about jihad, in order to understand the core arguments used by them in carrying out their actions. The existing studies argued that the earliest radical group in Islam dated back to the 1st century Hijra (7th century), by the rise of the Khawarij group. Yet, in modern times, it is Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun and Jamati-i Islami that have provided much inspiration for the emergence of contemporary radical movements, both of which use the concept of jihad, as a response to the hegemony of modern Western civilization. But unfortunately their reading of the jihad concept is too literal, partial, and not context-sensitive.
It is said that militant jihadism “has nothing to do with Islam,” that it is a recent phenomenon. This is the mantra of apologists. An examination shows that radical Islam has its roots to a remarkable extent in traditional exegesis and jurisprudence. Hawkish ulema treat wars of aggression against “infidels” as lawful and even required. The book of Allah teaches reconciliation but hawkish ulema reinterpreted it as a permit for aggression, if not repression. When dynastic rule replaced the caliphate, the official “interpretation” of revelation also changed. This alteration was a reflection of the politicisation of revelation. Hawkish ulama reinterpreted fighting in self-defense as jihad al-talab: the propagation of religion through wars of aggression, prohibited in revelation. By rendering unlawful wars of aggression lawful, hawkish ulama arrogated to themselves the right to judge between lawful and unlawful, a right that belongs exclusively to Allah. In this way militant ulema warped the teaching of revelation, and tainted it with shirk. They replaced Islam with political Islam. To politicise the knowledge of revelation, they “supplemented” revelation with “explanatory” books, the prophetic traditions. Unfortunately, the “supplementary” books of “revelation” did not “explain” revelation. On the contrary, they altered its teaching. For the Book of Allah emphasizes justice, morality, and rationality. But there are no books on these themes in Bukhari. Unlike the Book of Allah, the traditions ascribed to the prophet rob the teaching of revelation of its justice, ethics, and rationality. They strip Islam of its universality. They attribute a militant tenor to Islam. The misinterpretation of revelation spawned aggressive jihadism. The misinterpretation was exacerbated by the repression of reason, which also aided recourse to the teaching of abrogation. The repression of reason brought a range of aberrations, undermining the reliability of traditional exegesis (tafsir) and jurisprudence (fiqh). The emergence of militant jihadism was augmented by the treatment of the traditions as “equal” to the Book of Allah. Treating tradition as “revelation” fused and confused tradition with revelation, the rulings of Allah with the perceptions of the ulama. Hawkish ulama assert that: “tradition is revelation and a part of the Book of Allah.” Militant jihadism is characterised by the perception that the sharia is to rule the world. This misperception, a product of the corruption of the knowledge of revelation, encourages radicalisation. For “jihad” is a struggle for betterment. This is the greater jihad. Fighting in self-defense is the lesser jihad. Revelation neither prescribes nor permits aggressive jihad, a juristic invention. Unfortunately, militant ulama transformed the right to self-defense into a requirement to “propagate” Islam through wars of aggression and the perpetration of war crimes, into a sixth pillar of Islam. This represents a corruption of the teaching of revelation. Hawkish ulama transformed the religion of peace into a religion of war by asserting that the “peace verses” were “abrogated” by the verses of the sword. This epic corruption of the teaching of revelation was reinforced by traditions that endorse militant renditions of Islam. Jihadism resulted from the expansionary aspirations of rulers, fuelled by ulema willing to reinterpret revelation to furnish a “religious” justification for waging unlawful wars of aggression, under the rubric of “propagating” Islam by the sword. The transformation was underpinned by recourse to a vision in which the dar al-Islam or the realm of peace is in a life and death struggle with the dar al-kufr, the realm of unbelief. This perception is alien to the teaching of revelation. It is a variant of the “clash of civilizations” thesis, promulgated by Samuel Huntington. The “clash of civilizations” thesis is being used to justify the “war on terror.” It reflects a Hobbesian perspective, which perceives the world as a “war of all against all.” Jihadists present a threat to safety. For the jihadist acts as judge, jury and executioner. This requires audacity. The jihadist does not respond to reason. He or she is propelled by desires for revenge and power. He or she respects force. He or she practices the use of force in religion, which is contrary to the teaching of revelation, and follows what he or she is told without hesitation. An effective response requires effective enforcement. A long-term response requires a reform of traditional Muslim education. What Muslims are taught and the way they are taught require attention. For the present approach is faulty. There is not enough emphasis on reflection. There is excessive rote learning. There is excessive regurgitation. The teaching of predestination (jabr) and the teaching of abrogation also corrupted Muslim education. Muslims that believe in predestination perceive themselves as “machines,” without free will, programmed by Allah to do everything, not excluding the perpetration of crimes. Muslims are taught that the verses of reconciliation in revelation were abrogated by the ayah as-sayf (9:5) and that Allah expects Muslims to wage aggressive war (jihad al-talab) against non-Muslims even when Muslims are not being attacked. These corrupt perceptions are a relic of the past, the heritage of anti-rationalism, shutting the gates to reasoning, and taqlid. Renewal requires the rehabilitation and re-engagement of reason. Muslim thought requires reform. For knowledge of revelation was tarnished by problematic presuppositions. An example of a problematic practice is taqlid, the unquestioning following of tradition. Examples of unwarranted presuppositions encompass the perceptions that revelation features “unclear” verses or that revelation requires being “explained” by tradition. An example of a flawed teaching is that of abrogation. Another problematic assumption is the perception of tradition as “revelation.” By treating tradition as revelation – equal to the Quran – the exegetes abolish the difference between the words of God and the words of people. The amalgamation of tradition with revelation was a grave error. The “crisis” in the Muslim mind is a paralysis. For Muslims became enchanted by tradition to the extent they are willing to follow tradition even against reason, not to mention revelation. This requires reflection. It requires rethinking tradition and its relationship to revelation. Renewal also requires the rehabilitation of reason and the reform of education. Jihad means to “endeavour” or “struggle.” There is a difference between the greater and the lesser jihad. Armed struggle – in self-defense – is the lesser jihad. The effort to become better is the “greater jihad.” The transformation of defensive into offensive jihad was a juristic error. As a result, jihad is associated with terror. Politics corrupted the knowledge of revelation by tainting the exegesis of revelation. Using flawed reasoning, jurists reached a corrupt rendering of revelation. This rendering requires expanding the “realm of peace” at the expense of the “realm of war” by force. The alleged “abrogation” of the peace verses robbed Islam of its teaching of peace, corrupted the knowledge of revelation and generated confusion. The process was buttressed by recourse to bellicose ahadith, in defiance of the teaching of revelation. Politicised ulama accomplished this transformation by asserting that the peace verses of revelation were abrogated by the ayah as-sayf. Fighting in self-defense was reinvented as aggressive, pre-emptive warfare. Revelation, however, prohibits wars of aggression. Aggressive jihad endeavours to establish the rule of shariah everywhere. A distinguishing trait of the jihadist is sparse knowledge of revelation. This is a result of “traditional education,” of excessive focus on tradition at the expense of revelation and a deactivation of reason, inaugurated by the closure of the gates to ijtihad. There is excessive emphasis on rote learning, and not enough on understanding. The de-emphasis on thought in Muslim education was a legacy of the clashes between the traditionists and the rationalists. The traditionists follow Islam through the mediation of tradition. But Islam does endorse recourse to “middlemen.” It asks us to follow revelation without relying on mediators. Rationalists, by contrast, follow revelation understood by reason. Rather than follow revelation, as instructed by revelation, Muslims turned from revelation to tradition. Muslims became “traditional.” Rather than follow the Book of Allah, Muslims follow the non-revealed traditions of persons. Muslims became focused upon preserving the status quo rather than pursue reform. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09Y9BX3VV https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B09Y9BX3VV https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B09Y9BX3VV https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B09Y9BX3VV
This paper attempts to uncover the relationship, if any, between the early and medieval doctrine of Jihad in understanding the actions of contemporary Islamic fundamentalism. We suggest that early writings on the doctrine of Jihad and warfare are of little relevance unless studied alongside and in conjunction with a study of the specific individuals and contexts involved.
2016
ABSTRACT: Islam, the youngest of the three Semitic religions in the world today, is the fastest growing religion on earth. As a result, it faces a lot of criticism and blackmail directed at its adherents as well as renowned Muslims. The Islamic view on “shariah” (divine law), “hijab” (headscarf), polygamy, and, above all, “jihad”, are erroneously and mischievously translated by some non-Muslims historians. “Jihad” to them is nothing but war, terrorism, assassination, and using the sword’s edge to convert non-Muslims to Islam. This paper intends to analyze the historical perspectives of “jihad”, the concept, justifications, and the methods of recruitment of soldiers in “jihad”. It also analyses the Islamic instructions for Muslims in war front and the treatment of Islamic prisoners of war. The method of approach is purely from written sources, which comprise of documents, monographs, manuscripts, books, journals as well as magazines. The study reveals that those wars fought by the Mu...
Academia engineering, 2024
Caló, Susana (2023). Collective Militant Analysis. Deleuze and Guattari Studies 17 (2):283-300.
Les Nobles Stratimirović – du Moyen Âge à nos jours, 2023
Perspectives in education, 2024
Debates en Sociología, 2023
Sustainability, 2015
La Fabrique à écosystèmes, 2018
Indigenous Transnationalism: Alexis Wright's Carpentaria, 2018
Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 2022
Pediatric Research, 1987
Plant Breeding, 2003
Journal of Life Science, 2008
Spontaneous generations, 2012
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters