J Relig Health
DOI 10.1007/s10943-012-9571-3
ORIGINAL PAPER
Clergy Who Experience Trauma as a Result of Forced
Termination
Marcus N. Tanner • Jeffrey N. Wherry • Anisa M. Zvonkovic
Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Abstract Forced termination of clergy is a demeaning and psychologically distressing
experience. Clergy who experience a forced termination are subjected to mobbing (psychological harassment) and other activities meant to publicly or privately demean a
minister in such a way that they resign their ministry position. In a purposive convenience
sample of 55 ministers who had been forcibly terminated, participants scored above the
known cut-off score for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and scored high on a
measure of burnout and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Forced termination has been
anecdotally connected to PTSD and GAD, this project sought to empirically link PTSD and
GAD to the forced termination of clergy. This study raises concern for the long-term
mental health effects of ministers who have been forcibly terminated and provides
implications for future clinical study on this group of clergy. Findings in this research
indicate there may be a process to forced termination, which could be developed into a
theory on forced termination of clergy.
Keywords
Forced termination Clergy health Mental health Mobbing Burnout
Introduction
Although forced termination has been a subject of interest to clergy for some time, social
scientists largely have ignored this prevalent problem among Christian denominations.
Social science researchers have examined the difficulties and stressful nature of ministry
work dating back to Blizzard’s (1958) study, but have failed to examine the phenomenon
M. N. Tanner (&)
Texas Tech University, Box 42191, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
e-mail:
[email protected]
J. N. Wherry
Texas Tech University, Box 41230, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
A. M. Zvonkovic
Virginia Tech University, 366 Wallace Hall, Blacksburg, VA, USA
123
J Relig Health
of forced termination, a psychologically distressing experience. The extant literature on
forced termination of clergy is minimal at best (Barfoot et al. 2005; Crowell 1995; Tanner
and Zvonkovic 2011; Tanner et al., in press).
This study posits an empirical connection between the forced termination of clergy and
what the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders
(DSM-IV) (APA 1994) describes as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and general
anxiety disorder (GAD). This review of the literature first describes relevant studies on
ministry demands, burnout, and forced termination; the concept of mobbing; and the
association between mobbing, PTSD and GAD symptoms.
Literature Review
Kanter (1977) described the church as a ‘‘controlling organization’’ that requires work from
members of the family other than the minister, who is the person paid for ministry work.
The work of the ministry is a demanding profession constantly spilling over into the family
domain. Ministry demands make it difficult to balance work and family. The chronic stress
of working with demanding people takes its toll on ministers and may result in ministry
burnout. Additionally, ministers who do not meet the demands of a church may face forced
termination which has long-term implications for family well-being and physical health
(Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011; Tanner et al., in press).
Ministry Demands
Intrusive demands of ministry work have a detrimental effect on the attitude and wellbeing of ministers (Han and Lee 2004; Lee 1999; Lee and Balswick 2006; Lee and IversonGilbert 2003; Morris and Blanton 1994). Lee (1999) surveyed 312 ministers from five
Protestant denominations and identified four classifications of intrusive demands: personal
criticism, presumptive expectations, boundary ambiguity, and family criticism. Respondents reported experiencing more presumptive expectations from church members, and the
boundaries separating work and family were ambiguous. In addition, boundary ambiguity
type demands occurred more often than presumptive expectations. Lee’s (1999) ministry
demands were significantly associated with measures of burnout. He concluded that the
consequences of ministry work are different than other careers in the way work-related
stress for ministers is not confined to the domain of the workplace, but is more globally
impacting and affects other relational areas (i.e., other church members, family members,
other church staff, and other clergy members).
Burnout is a common problem for those working in caring professions. It is defined as
emotional exhaustion as a result of chronic stress from working with people (Maslach
et al. 2001). Burnout is characterized by three dimensions: emotional exhaustion,
depersonalization (an uncaring or dehumanized attitude), and a reduced sense of personal
accomplishment (Randall 2004). As Lee (1999) demonstrated that ministers who experience a high level of ministry demands are likely to experience burnout. A range of
physical and psychological problems associated with burnout and the ministry profession
(Kaldor and Bullpitt 2001). According to the researchers, ministry is a high-risk occupation (Hoge and Wenger 2005). Not only do clergy struggle with the effects of high
ministry demands, they also face a phenomenon that has long-term physical and mental
health implications; forced termination (Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011; Tanner et al., in
press).
123
J Relig Health
Forced Termination
Forced termination should be considered a new area of study. The scholarly literature on
forced termination comes from three empirical studies; Crowell’s (1995) dissertation
which focused primarily on the lack of church discipline as a precursor for a forced
termination of clergy, but provided no definition of forced termination. Church discipline is
the method churches use to regulate or control problem members or potential conflict. One
extreme form of church discipline is the ex-communication of church members. Barfoot
et al.’s (2005) exploratory study on forced termination provided a working definition
Forced pastoral exit is a process by which a congregation, a personnel committee, or
individual leader within a church terminates or forces the resignation of a minister
from a position of ministry (LaRue, 1996). Furthermore a pastor may abdicate his
post due to the constant negativity found in personal attacks and criticism from a
small faction within the congregation from whom the minister feels psychologically
pressured to step down from his or her service of ministry (Goodwin, 1997).
The lack of definition in Crowell’s (1995) dissertation is an unaddressed major limitation, and Barfoot et al.’s (2005) working definition was a confluence of two other nonscholarly works. Tanner and Zvonkovic (2011) defined forced termination as ‘‘the result of
a process of involuntary removal of paid and non-paid clergy-persons that includes psychological, emotional, social, and spiritual abuse.’’ This project provides some rationale for
a definition of forced termination that includes essential components of the process, as
findings may show forced termination to be much more detrimental to clergy’s mental
health than past empirical research shows. In addition, it should be noted that forced
termination of clergy should be distinguished from leaving the ministry and is different
than job loss in a non-clergy work environment (Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011).
Causes of Forced Termination
Barfoot et al. (2005) identified personality conflicts and conflicting vision for the church as
factors that typically lead to forced termination. Differences between the pastor and the
congregation in music and worship style were reported in Barfoot’s work. Conflict over
leadership styles and vision for the church (Willis 2001) were identified as other potential
causes of forced termination. Crowell’s (1995) study involved a sampling of church leaders
and found that 21% said the pastor was unfit or was not ‘‘called,’’ and 20% said congregational politics or powerful individuals were responsible for the pastor’s forced
termination.
Effects of Forced Termination
Tanner and Zvonkovic (2011) showed forced termination to be detrimental to clergy’s
sense of family well-being and physical health. Barfoot et al. (2005) revealed clergy (71%)
and their family (67%) had a diminished ability to trust people. Sixty-nine percent faced
long-term financial instability and had lower self-confidence (59%). LaRue (1996) gives
few indications of the effects forced termination has on clergy except to say that two-thirds
of children impacted by their parent’s forced termination were forced to change schools,
and spouses of clergy were forced to change jobs. Further, 10% experienced a major illness
within 12 months of being forced out.
123
J Relig Health
Studying Forced Termination
Extant literature shows that forced termination among clergy is a problem; between 23%
and 41% of pastors experience a forced termination at least once during their ministry
(Crowell 1995; Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011; Tanner et al., in press). Larue (1997) reported
91% of clergy know a minister who has been forced out, 23% of clergy having a personal
experience with forced termination, and 34% reported their predecessor as being forced
out. Tanner and Zvonkovic (2011) reported 41% of Assemblies of God clergy experience
forced termination. The demeaning and systematic process has a long-term effect on the
clergy who experience it. Greenfield (2001) described the systematic way in which a few
individuals in the church were responsible for harassing ministers in such a way that they
were forced to leave. Leymann’s (1996) work on mobbing is closely related to work on
forced termination among clergy.
Mobbing
Leymann (1996) and Leymann and Gustafsson (1996) described a process of mobbing in
the work place where a ‘‘victim is subjected to a systematic, stigmatizing process, and
encroachment of his or her civil rights’’ (p. 165). Their work primarily focused on a
number of work environments in Sweden, Finland, and Norway. The research on mobbing
does not include the ministry as a work environment. However, Leymann’s entire body of
work on mobbing is very similar to the concept and existing information on the forced
termination of clergy (see Greenfield 2001).
Operationalized, mobbing ‘‘involves hostile and unethical communication, which is
directed in a systematic way by one or a few individuals mainly toward one individual
who, due to mobbing, is pushed into a helpless and defenseless position, being held there
by means of continuing mobbing activities’’ (Leymann 1996, p. 168). These activities
happen on an almost daily basis and occur for months. Leymann (1996) posits that individuals who are victims of mobbing may experience psychological and physical stress. The
result of mobbing is a type of forced termination from the job and may lead to total
expulsion from the labor market, in this case leaving the ministry altogether.
Leymann (1996) revealed some of the following mobbing activities that people may
experience: (a) the victim is silenced by those in charge and left with the inability to speak
out for fear, (b) verbal threats, and other verbal activities which become part of keeping a
person from doing their job effectively, (c) being isolated from other people in the organization, (d) ridicule, (e) gossiping or rumors, (f) being given meaningless tasks, and
(g) being harassed in a threatening way. These types of activities are very similar to clergy
forced termination activities (Greenfield 2001). Leymann discusses some of the effects that
mobbing may have on an individual, including development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and expulsion from the labor market. Leymann’s (1996) work reveals that
10–20% of mobbing victims develop a serious illness or commit suicide as a result of being
mobbed.
Zapf et al. (1996) in their study of 149 mobbing victims showed that ‘‘mobbing leads to
severe health consequences’’ (p. 233). Their sample is not described in terms of the
professional work environment. The participants were recruited through local media and
self-help groups designed for mobbing victims. More than half of their sample received
medical treatment as a result of mobbing activities, and more than half had three or more
periods of sick leave during the previous 12 months.
123
J Relig Health
This study posits that the process of forced termination involves what Leymann (1996)
describes as mobbing inasmuch as it occurs over a period of time and results in the
expulsion of the minister from the church. Further, because mobbing and forced termination are conceptually linked, the rationale exists that serious mental health problems may
occur as a result of forced termination.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
PTSD is described by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth
Edition (APA 1994) as:
the development of characteristic symptoms following exposure to an extreme
traumatic stressor involving direct personal experience of an event that involves
actual or threatened death or serious injury, or other threat to one’s physical integrity;
or witnessing an event that involves death, injury, or a threat to the physical integrity
of another person or learning about unexpected or violent death, serious harm, or
threat of death or injury experienced by a family member or other close associate.
(p. 424)
GAD is described by the DSM-IV (APA 1994) as ‘‘excessive anxiety and worry,
occurring more days than not for a period of at least 6 months’’ (p. 472). A person will
find it difficult to control the worry, the anxiety will be accompanied by at least three
additional symptoms, and the individual will report subjective distress because of the
constant worry.
The research on mobbing illustrates a connection between the occurrence of mobbing
and PTSD and GAD. Anecdotally, both PTSD and GAD are commonly attributed as
effects of forced termination among clergy. However, no empirical research has connected
these disorders to forced termination of clergy. This study argues that, perhaps, clergy do
indeed experience symptoms of acute PTSD (because symptoms may usually last fewer
than 3 months) or at the very least experience GAD. It should be noted that forced termination does not fit the definition of a traumatic event (criterion A of PTSD) according to
the DSM-IV (APA 1994). Work on mobbing (Groeblinghoff and Becker 1996; Leymann
1996; Leymann and Gustafsson 1996; Niedl 1996; Resch and Schubinski 1996; Zapf et al.
1996), bullying in the workplace (Einarsen and Hoel 2001; Einarsen and Skogstad 1996;
Jiménez et al. 2007; Mikkelsen and Einarsen 2002; Vartia 1996), and work on forced
termination among clergy (Barfoot et al. 2005; Crowell 1995; Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011;
Tanner et al., in press) would indicate symptoms of PTSD, or GAD would be a deleterious
outcome to be expected for those experiencing the phenomenon of forced termination.
Purpose of the Study
The review of literature on the forced termination of clergy clearly shows it to be a
problem that has received little attention. A pilot project by Tanner and Zvonkovic (2011)
on forced termination of clergy showed 41% of Assemblies of God ministers experienced
forced termination. Although Barfoot et al. (2005) discussed several tangible effects of
forced termination and Tanner and Zvonkovic (2011) discussed physical health outcomes,
very little is known about the mental health effects of forced termination of clergy. The
purpose of this study is to examine the mental health effects of forced termination among
clergy. With that in mind, the following hypotheses are presented:
123
J Relig Health
Hypothesis one predicts that clergy’s perception of termination is predicted by the
issues surrounding the termination.
Hypothesis two predicts mobbing and psychological harassment will be positively
related to post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and burnout among clergy who
have been terminated.
Hypothesis three predicts mental health problems (PTSD, Anxiety, and Burnout)
would be significantly increased by termination issues, levels of psychological
harassment and mobbing, and perceptions of termination.
Methods
Procedure
This project made use of a small purposive convenience sample and used subjects from
two previous studies by the authors who were willing to participate in future studies on
forced termination. An email was sent to 100 individuals inviting them to participate in a
study on forced termination. A link was provided in an email to an online study.
Qualtrics was used as the survey software, specifically because it allows for skip logic
and piping. These are two techniques that allow participants to skip questions that are not
pertinent to them based on answers provided on previous questions. Seventy-eight people
responded to the survey, but only 55 completed the survey, providing for a 55% return
rate. Twenty-seven percent of the samples were Assemblies of God ministers, 18% were
Baptist, 15% were non-Denominational, 9% were Methodist, 9% were Presbyterian, 6%
were Church of Christ, while all other denominations made up 15% of the sample. The
denominational demographics are representative of clergy who have been forcibly terminated (Tanner et al., in press). Demographic information for participants can be found
in Table 1.
Measures
The literature suggests that forced termination is a psychologically demeaning process. The
measures used in this survey were designed to measure trauma, psychological abuse,
burnout, and anxiety.
Perceptions of Terminated Ministers (PTM)
First, scores were computed for each participant that completed the Perceptions of Terminated Ministers (PTM) scale. The PTM scale was designed by the authors for use in
determining the perceptions clergy have of forced termination and uses an 11-item Likert
Scale. Participants were presented with a series of statements and asked to select an answer
that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A sample statement is, ‘‘I often
think about the day I was forced to resign or was terminated from a ministry position.’’ A
total possible score was calculated by multiplying the number of questions by five. A midrange score is 27.5. Scores above 27.5 would indicate an increasingly negative perception
of forced termination on the original scale. Reliability yielded a Cronbach’s alpha score
of .84.
123
J Relig Health
Table 1 Demographic
variables
Variables
%
Minister gender
n
55
Male
67.3
Female
32.7
Minister age
15–24 years
1.8
25–34 years
10.9
35–44 years
29.1
45–54 years
47.3
55–64 years
7.3
65–74 years
1.8
75–84 years
1.8
Minister’s marital status
Married
81.8
All other categories
18.2
Ministry position at forced termination
Children’s pastor
1.8
Youth pastor
7.3
Associate pastor
16.4
Senior/solo pastor
36.4
Worship/music pastor
1.8
Other
9.1
Perceptions of Terminated Ministers Revised (PTM-R)
Second, because forced termination could be considered a distressing event, five questions
related to symptoms of PTSD were added to the PTM scale. Those questions were
developed from the description of PTSD in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (1994). A sample item reads, ‘‘Reminders of the event
are stressful.’’ The rationale for the included items derives from non-empirical writings on
the subject of forced termination and peer-reviewed research (Faulkner 1986; Onley 1994;
Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011). A total possible score was calculated by multiplying the
number of questions by five. A mid-range score is 40. A score above 40 would indicate
an increasingly negative perception of forced termination and symptoms of PTSD.
Frequencies in SPSS were used to determine the percentage of participants that scored
above the mid-range; forty-eight percent of the sample scored above 40 on the revised
measure. The frequency scores indicate that these ministers have a negative perception of
their termination and self-select-related symptoms of PTSD. The PTM-R scale with the
additional items yielded a Cronbach’s alpha score of .90.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Post-traumatic stress disorder was measured using the Impact of Event Scale: Revised
(IES-R) (Weiss 1996). The IES-R consists of 22 self-report items, measured on a 5-point
scale 1(not at all) to 5 (extremely), that assess the degree of PTSD symptoms experienced
in relation to a particular event. The IES-R assesses trauma-related intrusion, avoidance
symptoms, and hyperarousal symptoms of PTSD. Weiss, Marmar, Metzler, and Ronfeldt
123
J Relig Health
(1995) reported high internal reliability for the subscales of intrusion (a = .85), avoidance
(a = .85) and hyperarousal (a = .77). Reliability for the full scale score in this study was
.96. The mean score for PTSD as measured by the IES-R was 49 (SD = 21.35), and cut-off
scores for the IES-R have been reported at 33 (Creamer et al. 2003).
Mobbing
Mobbing was assessed using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) (Gemzoe-Mikkelsen
and Einarsen 2002). The NAQ includes 14 items, measured on a 5-point Likert scale (never
to daily). A sample item reads, ‘‘Someone withheld necessary information affecting your
performance.’’ Participants were asked to respond to mobbing activities that occurred
during the 6 months leading up to their forced termination. A score above 35 would
indicate mid to high levels of mobbing activities; 56% of the sample scored above the midrange. Reliability for this study was .95.
In addition, participants were asked to respond to a single question on the frequency of
psychological harassment. In the survey, psychological harassment was defined as ‘‘consisting of continued hostile attitudes, directed in a systematic way by one or more individuals against another one, with the purpose of discrediting, to humiliate, to isolate, and to
cause the abandonment of the job.’’ Frequency of psychological harassment was measured
on a 6-point Likert type scale 0 (none) to 6 (yes, daily). Twenty-four percent of respondents experienced psychological harassment several times a month.
Ministry Burnout
Ministry Burnout was assessed using a revision of the Scale of Emotional Exhaustion in
Ministry (SEEM) developed by Francis et al. (2004) and the Satisfaction in Ministry Scale
(SIMS) developed by Francis et al. (2005). The SEEM and the SIMS are each an 11-item
Likert scale for a total of 22 items, each measured 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly
agree). A sample item from the SEEM is, ‘‘fatigue and irritation are part of my daily
experiences.’’ A sample item from the SIMS is, ‘‘I have accomplished many worthwhile
things in my ministry here.’’ Reliability for this study was .94.
Termination Issues
Participants also were asked to self-select from 24 items described as issues relating to
forced termination. Crowell (1995) used these items as part of a dissertation. A sample
item reads, ‘‘The following were factors in my forced termination: lingering loyalty to
previous pastor.’’ Crowell did not report Cronbach’s alpha of these items as a scale,
however, for this study reliability was measured at .79. Additionally, a Pearson correlation
analysis was used to determine items that provided a cohesive association with one
another. Those items were used to determine a construct labeled ‘‘termination issues’’ and
included unresolved church trauma, unrealistic expectations for pastoral performance, and
lingering loyalty to previous pastor.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Finally, participants were assessed on symptoms of anxiety using the Beck Anxiety
Inventory (BAI) (Beck, Epstein, Brown, and Steer 1988). There are 21 symptoms of
123
J Relig Health
generalized anxiety disorder. Participants are asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert
scale (not at all to severe). Sample symptoms include ‘‘feeling hot’’ and ‘‘unable to relax.’’
Participants reported severe symptoms as ‘‘numbness or tingling’’ (17%), ‘‘unable to relax’’
(36%), ‘‘fear of worst happening’’ (41%), ‘‘heart pounding or racing’’ (17%), ‘‘nervous’’
(24%), and ‘‘fear of losing control’’ (15%). The mean score for generalized anxiety disorder as measured by the BAI was 24 (SD = 18.7), and cut-off scores for the BAI have
been reported at greater than 26 (Cochrane-Brink, Lofchy, and Sakinofsky 2000). Reliability for this study was .94.
Results
Hypothesis one predicted that clergy’s perception of termination would be predicted by the
issues surrounding their termination. A linear regression was used to analyze this
hypothesis. Perceptions of termination (PTM-R) were significantly predicted by termination issues; R2 = .23 p \ .01. The construct of termination issues accounted for 23% of the
variance as it related to minister’s perception of their forced termination. The direction of
the relationship was positive B = 6.81 such that as termination issues increased, so did the
negative perception of the termination.
Hypothesis two predicted the mobbing and psychological harassment would be significantly and positively associated with mental health issues, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and burnout. A Pearson correlation was used to
analyze this hypothesis. Mobbing was significantly and positively related to generalized
anxiety disorder r = .35, p \ .05, and psychological harassment was positively and significantly related to post-traumatic stress disorder r = .51, p \ .01 (see Table 2). Criterion
A in the DSM-IV (APA 1994) shows that an individual that exhibits excessive anxiety or
worry for more than 6 months about a number of events or activities may be diagnosed
with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). These results indicate that GAD is significantly
and positively correlated with the number of mobbing events clergy experienced, which
were associated with their forced termination. In addition, the frequency of mobbing
(psychological harassment) was associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
PTSD is a more severe diagnosis than GAD in part because Criterion A requires a person
to have experienced, witnessed, or been confronted with a traumatic event and the person’s
response to that trauma involved intense fear, helplessness, or horror. Clergy scored above
known clinical cut-off scores for PTSD as it relates to forced termination. However, forced
termination cannot be defined as a traumatic event according to the DSM-IV (APA 1994).
Mobbing and psychological harassment were significantly correlated p \ .05; that clergy
Table 2 Correlations table
Variables
1
2
3
4
Anxiety (BAS)
–
Burnout (MBS)
.30
–
PTSD
.31
.38*
–
Psychological
harassment
.04
.01
.51**
–
Mobbing
.35*
.01
.18
.41*
5
–
** p \ .01 * p \ .05
123
J Relig Health
Table 3 Multiple regression analysis on each of the dependent variables
Dependent
SE B
B
R2
b
PTSD
.46***
PTM-R
-.83
Mobbing
-.13
Psychological harassment
5.8
.25
-.49**
.19
-.10
2.3
.38
GAD
PTM-R
Mobbing
Psychological harassment
.34**
-.66
.41
-4.21
.24
.19
2.2
-.46**
.37*
-.33
Ministry burnout
PTM-R
Mobbing
Psychological harassment
.18*
-.63
-.03
-1.31
.26
.20
2.4
-.46*
-.03
-.11
*** p \ .001 ** p \ .01 * p \ .05
experience both a number of events and with high frequency may contribute to the
explanation of high scores on PTSD.
The empirical link between forced termination and mental health issues like PTSD and
GAD was a key factor in this study. Although the correlations were modest at best, this
study shows a statistically significant link between the variables. The results have shown
respondents score high on self-report measures of PTSD and GAD. Clergy also scored high
on measures of mobbing and psychological harassment.
Hypothesis three predicted mental health problems (PTSD, Anxiety, and Burnout)
would be predicted by perceptions of termination, mobbing, and psychological harassment.
A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted on each of the dependent variables. Scores on post-traumatic stress disorder were significantly predicted by all three
independent variables (PTM-R, mobbing, and psychological harassment) in the model
p \ .001, R2 = .46. Scores on generalized anxiety disorder were significantly predicted by
all three independent variables (PTM-R, mobbing, and psychological harassment) in the
model p \ .01, R2 = .34 (see Table 3). The multiple regression analysis on Ministry
Burnout was not significant. However, because the other mental health issues were predicted at such a high level, a hierarchical regression analysis was performed using Ministry
Burnout as the dependent variable, and each of the independent variables were entered
hierarchically into the model. Perceptions of termination (PTM-R) were entered as the first
independent variable to predict ministry burnout, and it was the only significant predictor
of burnout, p \ .05, R2 = .15. Entering the other independent variables into the model
significantly deterred the model and were subsequently rejected as predictors of burnout.
Limitations
One limitation of the study has been noted–data were not collected in a clinical setting for
the variables of PTSD and GAD. This study allowed for a partial assessment of symptoms
related to PTSD, and GAD that related literature shows would be relevant to forced
termination among clergy. Although the assessments were not clinically assessed, the study
showed that clergy experience symptoms of PTSD and GAD as it relates to their forced
123
J Relig Health
termination experience. In addition, the length of time between the event and the survey
was lengthy; some of the participants were remembering an event that happened, in some
cases 5 years before the time of the survey.
Sample size was another limitation to this study. The study made use of a small
purposive convenience sample of clergy who had been forcibly terminated from a ministry
position. The small sample size does not allow for generalization among larger populations
of clergy. However, the results of this small sample size are consistent with other studies of
clergy who have experienced forced termination (Barfoot et al. 2005; Crowell 1995;
Tanner and Zvonkovic 2011). Further, this study, although modest, provided an empirical
association with PTSD and GAD.
Discussion
This study’s purpose was to examine the mental health effects of forced termination on
clergy. Although the number of respondents was small, the sample focused on clergy who
have experienced a forced termination. The measures used in this study were focused on
mental health. Overall, this study shows a connection between the mental health of clergy
and forced termination. Mobbing and psychological harassment of clergy have serious
implications concerning symptoms of PTSD and GAD. This study made a significant
addition to the literature on forced termination of clergy, primarily in its empirical link
between forced termination and self-report scores on measures of PTSD and GAD.
The issues surrounding forced termination were a significant predictor of the perceptions ministers had of the event. Issues of termination concentrated on unresolved conflict
and lingering loyalty to the previous pastor. These issues, among others, accounted for
23% of the variance on perceptions of terminated ministers (PTM-R). Obviously, other
unaccounted for variables have an impact on the perceptions of termination, but conflict
and loyalty to the previous pastor explained near one-quarter of the variation.
Clergy who participated in this study had seriously high levels of anxiety as it related to
their forced termination—in many of the cases, more than a year had passed between
forced termination and participating in the study. This finding may suggest that forced
termination has long-term negative mental health effects. Thirty-six percent of the sample
scored above the mean score and known cut-off score for symptoms of GAD. In addition,
46% of the sample scored above the mean score and well above the clinical cut-off score
for symptoms of PTSD. It is important to note that this study was not carried out in a
clinical setting; rather, all of the items related to PTSD and GAD were reported by the
participants. It is also important to note that measured by the instruments in this survey
alone, the participants do not meet the DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for PTSD, but may for
GAD. At the same time, these are important findings. The type and frequency with which
participants experienced mobbing and psychological harassment were significantly associated with measures on PTSD and GAD.
The perception ministers had of their forced termination was the most significant predictor of mental health issues. Each regression analysis performed included mobbing and
psychological harassment as independent variables, but the larger percent of variance was
explained by scores on the PTM-R for each mental health variable (i.e., PTSD, GAD, and
Burnout). Not only did clergy have a very negative perception of their forced termination,
but perception predicted negative mental health. The empirical connection to PTSD
and GAD provides a rationale for a more inclusive definition of forced termination:
Forced termination is the result of a process of involuntary removal of paid and non-paid
123
J Relig Health
clergy-persons that results from a period of traumatic and demeaning psychological and
emotional abuse. Although this definition is more parsimonious than the working definition
of Barfoot et al. (2005), it still lacks a theoretical foundation. It already has been noted that
forced termination is different than job loss in general, and perhaps, because of the issues
surrounding forced termination, the psychological harassment clergy experience, and their
perceptions of those events, make forced termination a traumatic or at least very distressing
event, with long lasting effects, for the minister and possibly the church where the termination took place.
Implications
Previous studies show that 25–41% of Christian ministers experience forced termination at
least once during their career (Barfoot et al. 2005; Crowell 1995; Tanner and Zvonkovic
2011). Forced termination of clergy is a problem that may be more serious than some are
willing to admit. Carroll (2000) stated that numbers of new people entering the ministry are
relatively flat and indicated that those numbers may fall in coming years. As previously
stated, little is known about forced termination among clergy; few peer-reviewed empirical
research projects exist on the subject, and many Christian churches and organizations find
the subject taboo. Perhaps, the prevalence rates of forced termination are much higher, but
Christian organizations are unwilling to admit there is a problem and work with researchers
to understand it. Perhaps, the number of new ministers entering seminary is declining
because they are unwilling to risk the health of themselves and their family to fulfill God’s
call on their life.
The effects of forced termination were at least, very distressing, for the participants.
That is, the results indicated clergy experienced symptoms of trauma and anxiety. It would
be important for future researchers to study this issue in a clinical setting to more accurately determine the mental health effects of forced termination. Job loss and forced
termination do not meet the DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for being traumatic and are
generally not thought of as traumatic events. However, participants in this study scored
quite high on reliable measures of both PTSD and GAD. Future research should work to
properly identify how distressing forced termination is to those who experience it. In
addition, it is vital that denominations take a close look at the issue of forced termination
and its far-reaching implications.
Forced termination is an issue that must be addressed by ministers, churches, seminaries, and denominational organizations. This study shows that not only is forced termination an issue, but a cruel one that has very distressing effects on those who experience
it. It is important that Christian organizations recognize the problem and implement steps
to increase awareness and solutions. Local churches should implement training for all those
in leadership. Training should include how to recognize and appropriately deal with
psychological abuse. It is important that seminaries include a course in degree plans for
ministers that offer training in coping with psychological abuse. Perhaps, the most
important implication for this research is that governing bodies that oversee many
Christian ministers in the United States admit that this is an issue and take appropriate steps
to protect those that are called to serve the Church.
Directions for Future Research
Future research focused on clergy who have experienced forced termination should employ
the use of the Perceptions of Terminated Ministers scale—Revised (PTM-R). The scale is
123
J Relig Health
new and needs more testing and development but, the PTM-R has provided a theoretical
underpinning forced termination and burnout among clergy. Further, with the addition of
the trauma construct, the PTM-R explained most of the variance related to mental health
issues and forced termination. The five items measure the construct of trauma in the PTMR contribute to understanding how devastating the process of forced termination is. Those
items follow; (a) ‘‘I have painful memories of my termination experience,’’ (b) ‘‘Reminders
of the event are physically distressing,’’ (c) ‘‘I have distressing dreams about my forced
termination,’’ (d) ‘‘Negative thought about the event often reoccur,’’ and (e) ‘‘Reminders of
the event are stressful.’’
Little information is known about ministers who experience forced termination, but
even less is known about the effects on the family members of clergy who experience
forced termination and the immediate and long-term effects within churches who force a
minister out. Future research should include members of the clergy family. Research
should also be conducted that focuses on congregations involved with forced termination
and examine the effects on the church and its congregation.
Not only does this project add significant information to the scholarly body of research
on forced termination, it provides some important theoretical underpinnings for future
research. This project implies a process of forced termination. Girard’s work on mimetic
contagion (Girard 1965, 1979, 1987) may provide some explanation of this process. In this
study, we discovered clergy who have been forcibly terminated experience conflict with
small factions of the congregation. Perhaps, this conflict arises because of competition for
control. Girard’s concept of mimetic desire (Girard 1965) in which desire is not unique to
individuals but originates from the imitation of others. A triangular relationship is established between the object of desire (control of the local church), the model of desire, and
the imitator of desire. This type of relationship provides the foundation for conflict as both
minister and faction become competitors for control.
As competition for control of the church increases, the potential for viciousness escalates
between the minister and faction. This viciousness operationalizes itself as mobbing
(Leymann 1996; Leymann and Gustafsson 1996). The level of mobbing the people experience can vary. However, mobbing is highly contagious as indicated by Girard’s (1979, 1995)
work on mimetic contagion. Mobbing includes some level of psychological harassment,
usually directed at one person. Some ministers may choose to ‘fight back’ in the battle over
control. As the two maneuver for control, there are only two potential outcomes; the two
destroy one another, or a scapegoat is killed (Girard 1986; Greenfield 2001). This process
culminates when the minister (scapegoat) is left with no other choice but to leave the church,
either being fired or forced to resign. Subsequently, the minister experiences long-term
detrimental effects. While the authors call attention to some important elements to the process
of forced termination, more research is needed to understand forced termination. Future
research should be conducted which examines the elements of forced termination as a process
and focuses on developing a theory of forced termination.
References
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders:
DSM-IV. Washington, DC: Author.
Barfoot, D. S., Winston, B. E., & Wickman, C. (2005). Forced pastoral exits: An exploratory study.
Manuscript. Regents University. Virginia Beach, VA. Retrieved from http://www.pastorinresidence.
org/newsletter/SurveyPIR.pdf.
123
J Relig Health
Beck, A., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893–897.
Blizzard, S. (1958). Protestant parish minister’s self-image of his master role. Pastoral Psychology, 9(9),
25–32.
Carroll, J. (2000, October). Protestant pastoral ministry at the beginning of the new millennium. Paper
presented at the society for the scientific study of religion and religious research association, Houston,
TX. http://www.pulpitandpew.duke.edu/DPLP/reports/PDFs/jackcarroll.pdf.
Cochrane-Brink, K., Lofchy, J., & Sakinofsky, I. (2000). Clinical rating scales in suicide risk assessment.
General Hospital Psychiatry, 22(6), 445–451.
Creamer, M., Bell, R., & Failla, S. (2003). Psychometric properties of the impact of event scale-revised.
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1489–1496.
Crowell, R. (1995). Forced pastoral exits: An empirical study. Dissertation. Dallas Theological Seminary.
Dallas, TX.
Einarsen, S., & Hoel, H. (2001, May). The negative acts questionnaire: Development, validation and
revision of a measure of bullying at work. Paper presented at the 10th European congress on work and
organisational psychology, Prague.
Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private
organizations. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185.
Faulkner, B. R. (1986). Forced termination: Redemptive options for ministers and churches. Nashville:
Broadman Press.
Francis, L., Kaldor, P., Robbins, M., & Castle, K. (2005). Happy but exhausted? Work-related psychological
health among clergy. Pastoral sciences, 24(2), 101–120.
Francis, L. J., Kaldor, P., Shevlin, M., & Lewis, C. A. (2004). Assessing-emotional exhaustion among the
Australian clergy: Internal reliability and construct validity of the scale of emotional exhaustion in
ministry (SEEM). Review of Religious Research, 45(3), 269–277.
Gemzoe-Mikkelsen, E., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and
psychological and psychosomatic health complaints: The role of state negative affectivity and generalized self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 397–405.
Girard, R. (1965). Deceit, desire, and the novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Girard, R. (1979). Mimesis and violence: Perspectives in cultural criticism. Berkshire Review, 14, 9–19.
Girard, R. (1986). The scapegoat (Y. Freccero, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Girard, R. (1987). Generative scapegoating. In R. G. Hamerton-Kelly (Ed.), Violent origins: Walter Burkert,
Rene´ Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on ritual killing and cultural formation (pp. 74–145). Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
Girard, R. (1995). Violence and the sacred. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Goodwin, E. (1997, February). Forced terminations and ethics. The Servant. Publication of Ministering to
Ministers Foundation, Inc., 2(1), 1. Retrieved from 27 December, 2002. http://www.bengtson.org/
mtm/Servant/Vol_2_1/forced.htm.
Greenfield, G. (2001). The wounded minister: Healing from and preventing personal attacks. Grand Rapids,
MI: Baker Books.
Groeblinghoff, D., & Becker, M. (1996). A case study of mobbing and the clinical treatment of mobbing
victims. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 277.
Han, J., & Lee, C. (2004). Ministry demand and stress among Korean American pastors: A brief report.
Pastoral Psychology, 52(6), 473–478.
Hoge, D. R., & Wenger, J. E. (2005). Pastors in transition: Why clergy leave local church ministry. Grand
Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Jiménez, B., Muñoz, A., Gamarra, M., & Herrer, M. (2007). Assessing workplace bullying: Spanish validation of a reduced version of the negative acts questionnaire. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2),
449–457.
Kaldor, P., & Bullpitt, R. (2001). Burnout in church leaders. Adelaide: Openbook Publishers.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and
policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
LaRue, J. C. (1996). Forced exits: Personal effects. Retrieved from 11 May, 2009. http://www.christianity
today.com/yc/more/specialreport/6y6064.html.
LaRue, J. C. (1997). Forced exits: A too-common ministry hazard. Retrieved from 11 May, 2009.
http://www.christianitytoday.com/yc/more/specialreport/6y2072.html.
Lee, C. (1999). Specifying intrusive demands and their outcomes in congregational ministry: A report on the
ministry demands inventory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(4), 477–489.
Lee, C., & Balswick, J. (2006). Life In a glass house: The minister’s family and the local congregation.
Pasadena, CA: Fuller Seminary Press.
123
J Relig Health
Lee, C., & Iverson-Gilbert, J. (2003). Demand, support, and perception in family-related stress among
protestant clergy. Family Relations, 52(3), 249–257.
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.
Leymann, H., & Gustafsson, A. (1996). Mobbing at work and the development of post-traumatic stress
disorders. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 251–275.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W., & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1),
397–422.
Mikkelsen, E., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological
and psychosomatic health complaints: The role of state negative affectivity and generalized selfefficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 397–405.
Morris, M., & Blanton, P. (1994). Denominational perceptions of stress and the provision of support services
for clergy families. Pastoral Psychology, 42(5), 345–364.
Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and Well-being: Economic and personnel development implications. European
Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 239.
Onley, E. H. (1994). Crying on sunday: Surviving forced termination in ministry. Macon, Georgia: Smith
and Helwys Publishing Inc.
Randall, K. J. (2004). Burnout as a predictor of leaving Anglican parish ministry. Review of Religious
Research, 46(1), 20–26.
Resch, M., & Schubinski, M. (1996). Mobbing–prevention and management in organizations. European
Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 295.
Tanner, M. N., & Zvonkovic, A. (2011). Forced to leave: Forced termination experiences of assemblies of
god clergy and its connection to stress and well-being outcomes. Pastoral Psychology, 60(5), 713–726.
doi:10.1007/s11089-011-0339-6.
Tanner, M. N., Zvonkovic, A., & Adams, C. (in press). Forced termination of American clergy: Its effects
and connection to negative well-being. Review of Religious Research: The Official Journal of the
Religious Research Association, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s13644-011-0041-2.
Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying: Psychological work environment and organizational climate.
European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 203.
Weiss, D. (1996). Psychometric review of the impact of events scale-revised. Measurement of stress,
trauma, and adaptation (pp. 186–187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Weiss, D., Marmar, C., Metzler, T., & Ronfeldt, H. (1995). Predicting symptomatic distress in emergency
services personnel. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(3), 361.
Willis, C. (2001). Terminations of pastors, staff leveling off, survey results show. Retrieved from 30 Jan,
2008. http://www.nacba.net/Article/termination.htm.
Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content,
social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215.
123