Modern Greek Cities
Paris Papamichos Chronakisvisibility
…
description
6 pages
link
1 file
The Modern Greek experience is intimately tied to the city as a physical space, a national symbol, a nostalgic memory, and a fantasy of grandeur. This course focuses on such celebrated Mediterranean and world cities as Athens, Istanbul, Izmir, Thessaloniki, Alexandria, and, finally, Chicago to detail the Modern Greek urban experience and thus engage with the broader themes of colonialism, modern appropriations of antiquity, nation-building, multi-ethnic coexistence, war and refugeehood, and, finally, immigration and the recreation of homeland in the diaspora. Students will work with a variety of textual and visual sources and undertake original research in Chicago’s Greektown. No prior knowledge of Modern Greek history is required.
Related papers
Empire and Nation: Violence and Cosmopolitanism in the Eastern Mediterranean, 1856-1922
With Greece, Cyprus, Turkey, Syria and Egypt in crisis, the Eastern Mediterranean has once again caught the world’s attention. This course offers a historical perspective to current developments by examining the deep social, political, and cultural processes that transformed the Eastern Mediterranean from the mid-19th century Ottoman Reforms to the 1922 Greco-Turkish exchange of populations and the Egyptian Revolution of 1919. It explores the interconnected processes of social restructuring, cultural interaction, ethnic strife and sectarian violence and questions the common image of the Eastern Mediterranean as at once a model of cosmopolitan conviviality and an archetype of unbridled violence. Topics include: the modernization of the Ottoman Empire, colonial power in Egypt, the rise of Balkan and Near Eastern nationalisms, communal life and urban coexistence in the port-cities, the multiple presences of the West and its images of the Orient, the Balkan Wars and population movements, and, finally, present-day nostalgic reconstructions of the fin-de-siècle Mediterranean in popular and elite culture.
Drifting cities. Multiethnic societies from empire to nation-state
What happens to a multiethnic city, one inhabited by Jews, Greeks, and Muslims, Italians, Slavs, Jews and Greeks, or Germans, Czechs, Bohemians and Jews, when it passes from a dying empire to a nascent nation-state? This course focuses on Vienna and the Mediterranean ports of Trieste and Salonica from the late 19th century to the end of the Second World War and examines their transformation from cradles of Habsburg and Ottoman imperial modernity into laboratories of Austrian, Italian and Greek nationalism. Using a combination of primary sources, literary works, and films, and stressing the unique characteristics, the shared patterns of their trajectory, and no less the circulation of peoples, ideas, and things between the three cities, the course will: question the dichotomy of European - non-European empires and suggest other geographies (i.e. “Mediterreanean” - “Central European”); discuss the relation between urban modernity, empire and the nation-state; assess the impact of the First World War and interwar nationalism, antisemitism and state policies on the multiethnic urban fabric and the local class and ethnic hierarchies of power; examine the Holocaust and its traumatic memory; and ponder on the nostalgic imaginings of these cities in current public discourse.
The Mediterranean city. Conflict and Coexistence in the long twentieth century
Is there such a thing as a Mediterranean city? The Mediterranean Sea is home to some of the oldest, and most celebrated urban settlements in the world. Its cities have nonetheless experienced such repeated and deep transformations in the past two centuries as to become virtually unrecognizable with regards to the built environment, the ethnic composition of their population, and their discursive representations. This course takes a critical look at these developments, (and, no less, at the narratives employed to account for them), from a trans-national and inter-disciplinary perspective. By observing through the combined perspectives of history, urban studies, and anthropology; by employing a variety of sources (from literature to film to audiovisual testimonies); and by focusing on specific urban centers east and west, north and south of the Mediterranean (Istanbul, Salonica, Algiers, Marseille, Trieste, Athens, Tel Aviv), this course will examine the cities as shaped by the imperial state, the western traveller, the colonial urbanist, the nationalist visionary, the uprooted refugee, the Holocaust survivor, and the fighting soldier, in a kaleidoscopic attempt to understand the dramatic and traumatic experience of modernity in the streets and piazzas of the Mediterranean.
Jewish History 28/3-4 (2014): Special issue on Salonica's Jews
Special issue on the Jews of Salonica in the Ottoman and post-Ottoman period. Co-edited by Anthony Molho, Eyal Ginio and Paris Papamichos Chronakis.
Classical Tradition in Victorian Britain syllabus
Syllabus for Gen-Ed Classical Tradition course
PSC 6362. Nation-Building in the Balkans_Mylonas_Syllabus (Graduate, MA)
This is a class on nation-building in the Balkans. The first half of the course is designed to provide you with basic historical knowledge on the region and an overview of "unfinished business" in contemporary Balkans. In the second half of the course, we focus on the various nation-building policies Balkan nation-states have pursued toward different non-core groups over the 19th and 20th centuries. State policies have ranged from deportation and killings, to forced assimilation or even accommodation. The main emphasis of the class is to understand the logic behind these policy choices and evaluate their consequences. Toward the end of the semester we study "third-party nation-building" conducted by international organizations in the Western Balkans.
Macedonian Studies Journal - Volume 2, 2015, Issue 1
Macedonian Studies Journal - Journal of the Australian Institute of Macedonian Studies Melbourne, Australia
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia came into existence in 1991. This newly emerging state was not a country that was recreated after centuries, nor one which, having been destroyed or absorbed by others over the years, was once again restructured and reappeared, as was the case with Chechoslovakia, Israel or Palestine. As a matter of fact, there was never a country or a state bearing the name “Macedonia”, only the geographic region of ancient Macedonia, a region affiliated and interconnected with the history, language, civilization, culture and religion of Ancient Hellas. In 146 BC, the Romans, wishing to eradicate the Hellenic identity of the Macedonians, created a large dominion extending the ancient borders of Macedonia (see relevant paper in this edition of the MSJ), and calling the new territory Macedonia Prima (Provincia Macedoniae). When Roman General Quintus Caecilius Metellus defeated Andriscus of Macedon, Rome established a new province incorporating ancient Macedonia, which also included Epirus, Thessaly, and parts of Illyria, Paionia and Thrace. This created a much larger administrative area, to which the name of Macedonia was still applied. Hence, any sort or type of national irredentism regarding the name “Macedonia” as an ethnic or national nomenclature is anthropologically pseudonymous and politically irrational. Irredentism is the nationalist belief that a territory belonging to another country should be annexed for ethnic or historical reasons. Irredentist claims are usually justified on the basis that the irredentists' ethnic group, now or historically, formed the majority in that territory or that the territory was part of the irredentists' nation-state at some point in the past. In the case of the people of FYROM, the Macedoslavs, who try to emerge unilaterally as the “Macedonians”, nothing of the above is validated. The constitutional name of “Macedonia” that they were inspired to use for their country was never a territory exclusively or primarily or historically occupied by “Macedonians”; “Macedonians” never formed the majority in this territory and most importantly this region was never the nation-state of the “Macedonians.” Furthermore, irredentism is to be distinguished from territorial expansionism, in that irredentism claims to advocate taking back land that is "rightfully ours," while expan-sionism advocates annexation regardless of whether the territory was "ours" in the first place. Hence, the actual mode of irrational behaviour of the Macedoslavs should be called expansionism and not just irredentism in the Balkans; a tendency which inflames ethnic and national unrest and creates instability to the wider European community. The name of the hypothetical country resulting from successful annexation frequently contains the word "Greater", such as, for example, in Greater Serbia, Greater Albania, or Greater Russia, as we have recently experienced with the annexation of Crimea. Then there comes the third means of nationalism: secessionism. The scholarship on irredentism and secessionism suggests that the former is more likely to become violent and result in war than the latter. Irredentist conflicts are often instigated by sovereign states, whereas, secessionist conflicts are usually initiated by minority groups. Since sovereign states have military capability to fight full-scale wars, irredentist conflicts tend to be more violent and/or turn international. Given that minority groups lack military resources to fight for their causes, secessionist conflicts on the other hand normally do not escalate to interstate war. However, what happens if a sovereign state with a full-fledged army decides to support a secessionist cause? We refer our readers to the Ukraine experience and the prolonged civil war there. Since 2006, the Macedoslavs of FYROM, via their ultra-nationalist government of Nicola Gruevski and its agencies have attempted to implement within their new national borders and in the Macedoslavic Diaspora all three expressions of nationalism, namely irredentism, expansionism and secessionism, thus acting as a serious source of instability in the Balkans and the greater European community. They preach irredentism by posing as “Macedonians” when they never historically formed the majority in Macedonia or Macedonia Prima. In their delirious nationalism they masquerade their Macedoslavic identity and adulterate their culture with Hellenic statues and Greek cultural monuments belonging to another nation-country, namely Hellas, simply to pose as ancient Macedonians. Hence, they demonstrate disrespect and betray their own renowned Slavic culture and civilization. They preach expansionism infiltrating the conscience of the few thousands of Greek bilingual citizens in Ancient Macedonia, the birthplace of Alexander the Great and Aristotle, a region in which they desire to find their “enslaved compatriots”, the Egejski Makedonci. Finally they preach secessionism both within their national borders as well as in the Diaspora via their propaganda machine, their consular staff and their publications producing maps of the Greater Macedonia. Historically, there have been many territories that have changed hands very often, and territories in which the ethnic composition has changed over time. This means the claims of different irredentist movements of what is "rightfully theirs" very often overlap. Since the borders of nearly all nations have changed over time, irredentist attitudes can be found in most parts of the world. Usually, they are part of nationalist ideologies, though by far not all nationalist ideologies and groups include them. Fortunately, irredentism usually does not receive the official support it once did. The Gruevski government constitutes an extreme form of irredentism, expansion-ism and secessionism, seeking to expand its newly emerged country to a maximum extent, regardless of whether the Macedoslavs ever actually formed the majority in the territory in question. The government of FYROM should be reminded that similar expressions of nationalism, expansionism and secessionism are also displayed by other ethnicities within its national borders. According to the Gallup Balkan Monitor 2010 report, the idea of a Greater Albania is supported by the majority of Albanians in Albania (63%), Kosovo (81%) and the Republic of “Macedonia” (53%). This clearly demonstrates that it would be more prudent to safeguard the welfare of the Macedoslav people, build constructive relations with neighbouring countries, reinforce the social cohesion of citizens rather than waste the country’s human and material resources to chase ghosts and imagined enemies in the south.
BEYOND THE "VALLEY OF TEARS": REASSESSING THE NARRATIVE OF DECLINE IN SALONICAN JEWISH HISTORIOGRAPHY
ÉTUDES BALKANIQUES, 2018
Scholars have relied upon diverse methodologies and sources to produce a new corpus of studies about Salonica’s Jews that explores the impact of the end of the Ottoman Empire and the consolidation of the Greek nation-state. Much of the newer scholarship, however, reinforces the perception that Salonica’s Jews experienced a period of “decline” after the city’s incorporation into the Greek state (1912 – 1913) that culminated in their deportation to Auschwitz (1943). This study investigates why such a lachrymose and teleological interpretation of Salonican Jewish history persists today. By reference to new sources and a different interpretive lens, this article also challenges conventional wisdom concerning key turning points in the narrative of the city’s Jews: a major fire (1917), a compulsory Sunday closing law (1924), and the first major act of anti-Jewish violence (1931). The article thus offers a new approach to assessing the encounters between the multiplicities of Jews in Salonica and the Greek state.
GKM / HIST 286
MODERN GREEK CITIES -- SPRING, 2015
1:00-1:50 Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays, Stevenson Hall 220
CLASS WEBSITE: http://blackboard.uic.edu
INSTRUCTOR:
OFFICE HOURS
Paris Papamichos Chronakis
Fridays, 4:00-5:30 pm
(or by appointment)
1818 University Hall
e-mail: [email protected]
COURSE DESCRIPTION & GOALS:
The Modern Greek experience is intimately tied to the city as a physical space, a national
symbol, a nostalgic memory, and a fantasy of grandeur. This course focuses on such celebrated
Mediterranean and world cities as Athens, Istanbul, Izmir, Thessaloniki, Alexandria, and, finally,
Chicago to detail the Modern Greek urban experience and thus engage with the broader themes
of colonialism, modern appropriations of antiquity, nation-building, multi-ethnic coexistence,
war and refugeehood, and, finally, immigration and the recreation of homeland in the diaspora.
Students will work with a variety of textual and visual sources and undertake original research in
Chicago’s Greektown. No prior knowledge of Modern Greek history is required.
REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING:
Book review essay
Greek Chicago History Project
Quizzes (2)
Weekly assignments
Attendance, & Participation (10% + 5%, respectively)
20%
30%
20%
15%
15%
Book review essay: You will be writing a 1,200-word, critical review of one of the assigned
books. The essay must be emailed to me by 11:00 pm on the days shown in the calendar. Late
papers can be turned in, but 3% will be deducted for each day that it is late. Note, that you are
entitled to a 48-hour paper extension but only once per semester and if you contact me at
least one day before the paper is due.
Greek Chicago History Project: This is a collaborative project we will undertake together with
the aim of documenting facets of the Greek experience in Chicago and making them available
online. The project will include the compilation of an annotated bibliography and a list of
available archival resources, the mapping of Greek Chicago, as well as oral interviews with
Greek American Chicagoans.
Participation and Quizzes: Attendance, active engagement, and an average of 50 pages of
reading per week are all required for this course. You are responsible for coming to class
1
prepared to discuss the assigned readings. We will also have two in-class quizzes, which will be
announced beforehand and can be found on the calendar below. They cannot be made up except
in the case of a documented medical or family emergency or a university-recognized religious
observance.
Attendance will count for 10% of your final grade, and participation for 5%. Anyone who is not
present in the first five minutes will be counted as absent. You are entitled to five unexcused
absences. Every one thereafter will deduct 2 points (out of the 10 possible) from the attendance
grade in the class. That means, for example, that missing 8 classes (the 5 “no questions asked”
absences + 5 others) would result in an attendance grade of 0 and lower your overall grade in the
class by one complete letter. However, you can make up for your absences and retain your grade
if you request extra homework.
Absences can only be excused for required UIC events, university-recognized religious holidays,
and verifiable medical emergencies to you or your immediate family. If you miss a class and
believe it should be excused, please contact me within one week of the absence; they will not be
excused thereafter. If you must take an extended absence, please contact the Office of the Vice
Chancellor for Student Affairs for help.
Laptop use: Laptop use must be reduced to the minimum and should be confined to note taking.
Failure to comply with this basic rule may result in a lower class participation grade.
Blackboard: All texts will be readily available electronically on Blackboard
(http://blackboard.uic.edu). You are therefore responsible for learning how to log into
Blackboard and use its features, and you will need to make arrangements to access it to upload
lecture notes, check your grades, and turn in writing assignments.
ACADEMIC HONESTY:
Discussing and sharing thoughts with each other, online or offline, is highly recommendable. But
for all graded materials for this course, you should research, think and write on your own. In the
papers and exams acknowledge quotations and ideas drawn from books, articles, websites, and
other texts by adding a footnote or some other form of reference mark. Failure to do so
constitutes plagiarism, which the University defines as “Intentionally or knowingly representing
the words or ideas of another as one’s own in any academic exercise.” Academic integrity is
highly important and the University’s policy can be found in the Undergraduate Catalog, at:
http://www.uic.edu/ucat/catalog/GR.shtml#qa.
All assignments will be evaluated for plagiarism. Any assignment that appears to have been
plagiarized will receive a grade of 0; a second instance of plagiarism will result in failure of the
course and referral to the Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs.
There is no need to panic. I will upload specific guidelines about research and writing
techniques on Blackboard. Moreover, in the course of the semester there will be a session with
a librarian who will help you acquaint yourself with the library facilities, conduct research,
organize your notes and compose an essay. Besides, plagiarism is easily avoidable. It is enough
to enclose any words that are not your own into quotation marks and that you note where you
found any material (textual or visual) that you include in your essays. We will go through all of
that in class, but for more insights into the art of referencing you can also consult a book such as
A Pocket Guide to Writing History, which is usually available at the UIC Bookstore. Feel free to
ask me, -there is no need to quote my replies!
2
STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
Students with disabilities who require accommodations for access and participation in this course
must be registered with the Office of Disability Services (ODS). Please contact ODS at 312-4132103 (voice) or 312-413-0123 (TTY).
Required books
All books are available for purchase at the UIC bookstore. All readings not listed below will be
available on Blackboard:
- Mark Mazower, Salonica, City of Ghosts: Christians, Muslims and Jews 1430-1950 (2006)
- Philip Mansel, Constantinople: City of the World's Desire, 1453–1924 (2006)
- Michael Haag, Alexandria: City of Memory (2004)
Optional introductory texts and reference works
These texts provide important historical information on the history of Modern Greece and the
Eastern Mediterranean and make for useful background reading:
- Thomas Gallant, Modern Greece (London, 2001)
- Richard Clogg, A Concise History of Greece (Cambridge, 1992)
- John S. Koliopoulos & Thanos M. Veremis, Modern Greece: A History since 1821
(Chichester, 2009)
- William Cleveland, A History of the Middle East (Philadelphia, 2012)
- Donald Quataert, The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922 (Cambridge, 2005)
CLASS CALENDAR
Part I: The Modern Greek urban experience. From cosmopolitanism to nationalism
WEEK 1
Jan. 12: Introduction
Jan. 14: Athens I: The Ottoman city and the European gaze
- (Background reading) Thomas Gallant, Modern Greece (London, 2001), Chapter 1 (The
Ottoman Legacy), pp. 1-8.
- E. Dodwell, The Bazaar of Athens (image analysis)
- Nicholas Biddle in Greece. The Journals and Letters of 1806 (excerpts)
Jan. 16: Discussion
WEEK 2
Jan. 19: No classes, Martin Luther King Day
Jan. 21: Athens II: Building a capital
- (Background reading) Thomas Gallant, Modern Greece (London, 2001), Chapter 4
(Constructing the modern nation), pp. 55-75.
- Eleni Bastea, The Creation of Modern Athens. Planning the Myth, Chapter 4 (Planning new
Athens), pp. 69-104.
Jan. 23: Discussion
WEEK 3
3
Jan. 26: Athens III: Neoclassicism and the experience of modernity
- George Horton, Modern Athens (1901) (excerpts)
- Archaeology of the City of Athens (website)
Jan. 28: Athens IV: the Acropolis: Ancient ruins, modern visions
- Visit to the exhibition “The Periclean Acropolis: from Antiquity to Modernity”, National
Hellenic Museum
Jan. 30: Discussion
WEEK 4
Feb. 2: Istanbul I: Orientalism and the remaking of an Ottoman capital
- Philip Mansel, Constantinople, Chapter 13 (Yildiz)
Feb. 4: Istanbul II: Greeks, Jews and Muslims
- Philip Mansel, Constantinople, Chapter 10 (city of marvels)
Feb. 6: Discussion
WEEK 5
Feb. 9: Istanbul III: a city in revolution: the Young Turks
- Philip Mansel, Constantinople, Chapter 14 (Young Turks)
Feb. 11: Workshop: researching in the library
Feb. 13: Discussion
WEEK 6
Quiz 1 (February 16)
Feb. 16: Alexandria I: colonialism and nationalism
- Michael Haag, Alexandria (excerpts)
Feb. 18: Alexandria II: Cavafy
- Constantine Cavafy, select poems on Alexandria
- Michael Haag, Alexandria (excerpts)
Feb. 20: Discussion
WEEK 7
Assignment: Book review essay due 11 pm, Friday, February 27
Feb. 23: Izmir I: a cosmopolitan, Ionian Greek port-city
- Giles Milton, Paradise Lost (excerpts)
Feb. 25: Izmir II: The Catastrophe
- (Background reading) Thomas Gallant, Modern Greece (London, 2001), Chapter 6 & 7, pp.
125-150
- Giles Milton, Paradise Lost (excerpts)
- Documentary: Smyrna: The Destruction of the Cosmopolitan City, 1900-1922 by Maria Iliou
Feb. 27: Discussion
WEEK 8
Mar. 2: Izmir III: Memory
- Biray Kirli, ‘Forgetting the Smyrna Fire’ (2005)
- Websites of Asia Minor refugees
Mar. 4: Athens V: refugee city
4
-
G. A. Yiannakopoulos, Refugee Greece: Photographs from the Archive of the Centre for Asia
Minor Studies (1992)
- Renée Hirschon, Heirs of the Greek Catastrophe: The Social Life of Asia Minor Refugees in
Piraeus (1989) (excerpts)
Mar. 6: Discussion
WEEK 9
Mar. 9: Salonica I: A Jewish-Ottoman-cosmopolitan city
- Documentary: Thessaloniki in Colors
Mar. 11: Salonica II: The Jerusalem of the Balkans
- Mark Mazower, Salonica, City of Ghosts, Chapters 3, 9, 11
- Thessaloniki 1900-1930
Mar. 13: Discussion
WEEK 10
Mar. 16: Salonica III: the Great Fire & making the city Greek
- Audiovisual testimonies of Greek Jewish Holocaust survivors from the Shoah Foundation
Institute’s Visual History Archive
- Mark Mazower, Salonica, City of Ghosts, Chapters 14, 16, 18, 20
Mar. 18: Salonica IV: the Holocaust
- Mark Mazower, Salonica, City of Ghosts, Chapters 21-22
- Sofianopoulos, The Jews of Thessaloniki (documentary, 58΄, 1997)
Mar. 20: Discussion
Mar. 23-27: Spring Break, no classes
WEEK 11
Mar. 30: Salonica V: Salonican Jews in Auschwitz
- Audiovisual testimonies of Greek Jewish Holocaust survivors from the Shoah Foundation
Institute’s Visual History Archive
Apr. 1: Salonica VI: A city of ghosts
- Mark Mazower, Salonica, City of Ghosts, Chapter 23, Introduction, Conclusion
- Maurice Amaraggi, Salonica City of Silence (documentary, 52 min. 2006)
Apr. 3: Discussion
WEEK 12
Quiz 2 (April 6)
Apr. 6: Athens VI: a city in film
- Documentary, In exchange for five apartments and one shop! (2005, 110 min.)
Apr. 8: Athens VII: a city in film
- Documentary, In exchange for five apartments and one shop! (2005, 110 min.)
Apr. 10: Discussion
Part II: The “Greek Chicago” Project
WEEK 13
Apr. 13: Chicago I: the Greek-American experience: the journey
5
Visit to the exhibition “Reaching for the American Dream: the legacy of Greek
immigration”, National Hellenic Museum
- Maria Iliou (dir.), The Journey: the Greek-American Dream (documentary, 2007)
- Ann Beck, Greek Immigration to, and Settlement in, Central Illinois, 1880-1930 (2014),
Chapter 3
Apr. 15: Chicago II: the Greek-American experience: The rise and fall of Greektown
- Visit to the Gus and Mary Stathis Library and Resource Center, National Hellenic Museum
- Natalie Walker, “Chicago Housing Conditions. Greeks and Italians in the Neighborhood of
Hull House” (1915)
Apr. 17: Discussion – Project meeting
-
WEEK 14
Apr. 20: Chicago III: the Greek-American experience: the view of others
- Visit to the Jane Addams Hull-House archives, Richard J. Daley Library
- Grace Abbott, “A study of the Greeks in Chicago” (1909)
Apr. 22: No class
Apr. 24: Discussion – Project meeting
WEEK 15
Apr. 27: Chicago IV: the Greek-American experience: religion and community life
- Visit to the St. Basil Greek Orthodox Church
- Nick T. Thomopoulos, 100 Years: From Greece to Chicago and Back (2011) (excerpts)
Apr. 29: Chicago V: the Greek-American experience: documenting history
- Michael George Davros, Greeks in Chicago (2009) (excerpts)
May 1: Discussion – Project meeting
Submission of the “Greek Chicago Project” component: 11 pm, Wednesday, May 6
6
Related papers
Qualitative Benefit and Enhancement in Well Being Towards the Biophilic Design in Office Building
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 2023
QUẢN LÝ VỤ KIỆN VÀ QUYẾT ĐỊNH VỀ THỦ TỤC TỐ TỤNG -HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC HÀNH TRỌNG TÀI QUỐC TẾ
QUẢN LÝ VỤ KIỆN VÀ QUYẾT ĐỊNH VỀ THỦ TỤC TỐ TỤNG -HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC HÀNH TRỌNG TÀI QUỐC TẾ, 2015
Nhà biên soạn thực sự của Manuductio
Journal of Vietnamese Studies , 2019
Study of Human Reactions than Color and its Effects on Advertising
International Journal of Accounting Research, 2013
Security Environment and National Security
DYNAMICS IN THE SECURITY ENVIRONMENT AND THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE BULGARIAN NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY, 2018
Igneous Rock Associations 8. Arc Magmatism II: Geochemical and Isotopic Characteristics
Geoscience Canada, 2007
Creatio ex Creatione a Natura Amoris A Critical Assessment of a Contemporary Relational Theory of Creation
Evangelical Quarterly, 2022
Household Perception on Water Consumption in Urban Area: A Case Study of Cuttack City, Odisha India
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2023
Service design for artificial intelligence
Proceedings of ServDes2018 - Service Design Proof of Concept, 2018
DEVELOPMENT OF THE HOME AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT (HACE) INSTRUMENT
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2005
Distinct approaches for the detection and removal of chimeric 16S rRNA sequences can significantly affect the outcome of between-site comparisons
Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 2012
Multiculturalism and Citizenship in the Netherlands
The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity, 2019
Spreads and Volatility in House Returns
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
Osmanli’Nin Tarimsal Mi̇rasi Ve Erken Cumhuri̇yet Dönemi̇nde Kirsal Kesi̇mi̇n Kalkinmasina Yöneli̇k Çalişmalar (Bursa Örneği̇nde)
Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 2017
GLOSSI: a method to assess the association of genetic loci-sets with complex diseases
BMC Bioinformatics, 2009