Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Effects of Glutaraldehyde on Synovial Tissue

2003, Journal of International Medical Research

This study investigated the effect of glutaraldehyde on the synovial tissue of rabbits. Four different concentrations of glutaraldehyde solution were injected into one knee and the contralateral glenohumeral joint of rabbits in group A to group D. The concentration levels used in group A and group B were 1000 ppm and 100 ppm, respectively. For group C and group D, samples of rinsing solutions obtained by rinsing arthroscopic equipment with ***1 l or ***2 l of isotonic saline, respectively, after immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde were used. The contralateral knee and ipsilateral glenohumeral joint of the same rabbits were injected with saline and used as control sites. Rabbits were sacrificed after 1 day, 7 days or 15 days and the histopathological changes in the synovial tissues were compared. The most dramatic inflammatory changes were observed in group A and group B. The histopathological changes were greater after 7 days than after 1 day or 15 days. Group C and group D showed no sig...

The Journal of International Medical Research 2003; 31: 422 – 427 Effects of Glutaraldehyde on Synovial Tissue N TOSUN, F AKPINAR AND A DOGAN Department of Orthopaedia and Traumatology, Medical School, Yüzüncü Yil University, Van, Turkey This study investigated the effect of glutaraldehyde on the synovial tissue of rabbits. Four different concentrations of glutaraldehyde solution were injected into one knee and the contralateral glenohumeral joint of rabbits in group A to group D. The concentration levels used in group A and group B were 1000 ppm and 100 ppm, respectively. For group C and group D, samples of rinsing solutions obtained by rinsing arthroscopic equipment with 1 l or 2 l of isotonic saline, respectively, after immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde were used. The contralateral knee and ipsilateral glenohumeral joint of the same rabbits were injected with saline and used as control sites. Rabbits were sacrificed after 1 day, 7 days or 15 days and the histopathological changes in the synovial tissues were compared. The most dramatic inflammatory changes were observed in group A and group B. The histopathological changes were greater after 7 days than after 1 day or 15 days. Group C and group D showed no significant differences when compared with normal synovium. A correlation between the concentration of the glutaraldehyde solution and the number of inflamed joints was observed. Very few or no inflamed joints were seen when samples from rinsing solutions of 1 l or 2 l of saline, respectively, were used. KEY WORDS: GLUTARALDEHYDE; SYNOVITIS; ARTHROSCOPY; SALINE Introduction Glutaraldehyde, a powerful cold disinfectant, is widely used to sterilize various items of endoscopic equipment. Despite having several advantages in terms of rapid effectiveness, low cost and relative safety, several authors have reported various gastrointestinal, respiratory and ocular sideeffects associated with exposure to this solution.1 – 5 The observation of postarthroscopic synovitis in a considerable number of patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy led our surgical team to study a possible correlation between the use of glutaraldehyde as a disinfectant and this complication. The clinical diagnosis of postarthroscopic synovitis was confirmed by re-arthroscopy in all cases. Arthroscopic equipment is immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 15 – 20 min before surgery to achieve sterilization. Before insertion into the knee joint, the instruments are rinsed with isotonic solution.1 – 8 The use of an inadequate amount of isotonic solution for rinsing may result in some glutaraldehyde remaining on the surface of the equipment. Various effects of glutaraldehyde on the gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary and ocular systems have been reported and 422 N Tosun, F Akpinar, A Dogan Effects of glutaraldehyde on synovial tissue studied experimentally. All of these systems are anatomically open systems and are covered by an epithelial layer. Their anatomical, histological and physiological properties not only protect the structures beneath the epithelium, but also tend to remove foreign materials by their secretions. In contrast, synovial joints are closed anatomical spaces and are vulnerable to the toxic effects of glutaraldehyde.1 Many authors have studied the toxic effects of glutaraldehyde on synovial tissue, but the majority of these reports are clinical series.9 – 16 The purpose of this study was to experimentally investigate a possible toxic effect of various concentrations of glutaraldehyde on the synovial tissue of large joints in rabbits. Material and methods RABBITS AND SOLUTIONS The local ethics committee approved this study. Rabbits were randomly divided into four study groups (A to D). One knee and the contralateral glenohumeral joint of each rabbit were injected with 0.5 ml of test solution. The contralateral knee and ipsilateral shoulder joint were used as control sites and were injected with the same amount of saline. Rabbits in each group were paired randomly, and the test/control sites of each rabbit were determined by flipping a coin. For group A and group B, glutaraldehyde solution at concentrations of 1000 ppm and 100 ppm, respectively, were used as the test solution administered into the knee joints of the rabbits. Arthroscopic equipment was immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde for sterilization and then rinsed with 1 l of isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl); the resulting rinsing solution was used as the test solution for the knees of group C. In a similar manner, the testing solution for group D consisted of the rinsing solution from arthroscopic equipment rinsed with 2 l of saline after immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde. JOINT INJECTIONS All the joint injections were carried out on all the rabbits on the same day. After wiping the joint area with 70% ethanol, the test solution was injected into the joint. The lateral side of the knee joint beneath the patella and the anterior joint capsule of the shoulder were used as the entry points for the injections. JOINT ANALYSIS Three randomly chosen rabbits from each group were sacrificed on the first day, three on day 7, and two on day 15 under general anaesthesia. Musculotendinous, vascular and neural structures around the joint capsules were removed, and routine histopathological procedures applied to the joint tissue. Standard light microscopy conducted by the same histopathologist was used to assess the histopathological changes in the synovial tissue. The histopathologist was completely blinded to the group from which the slides came. The existence of inflammation of the synovial tissue was considered to be a positive result. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). P-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. Results A total of 36 rabbits were used and each group included 9 rabbits at the beginning of the study. The average weight of the rabbits was 1750 g (range 1600 – 2100 g). One rabbit from each group (n = 4) died due to environmental factors during the study period. No histopathological changes were observed in the synovial tissues from the control sites. The absence or presence of 423 Experimental sites Control sites Joints with inflammatory changes Group Day Total no. of joints No. % Joints with inflammatory changes Day Total no. of joints No. % 424 A 1 7 15 6 6 4 4 6 2 67 100 50 1 7 15 6 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 7 15 6 6 4 3 4 3 50 67 75 1 7 15 6 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 1 7 15 6 6 4 1 1 0 17 17 0 1 7 15 6 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 7 15 6 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 15 6 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Tosun, F Akpinar, A Dogan Effects of glutaraldehyde on synovial tissue TABLE 1: Inflammatory changes, observed using standard histological procedures, in rabbit synovial tissue removed from the knee and contralateral glenohumeral joints injected with glutaraldehyde, and the contralateral knee and ipsilateral joints injected with 0.9% saline (control). The concentrations of gluteraldehyde injected into the joints were: 1000 ppm (group A); 100 ppm (group B); solution collected by rinsing arthroscopic equipment that had been immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde with 1 l of 0.9% saline (group C); and solution collected by rinsing arthroscopic equipment that had been immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde with 2 l of 0.9% saline (group D) N Tosun, F Akpinar, A Dogan Effects of glutaraldehyde on synovial tissue 120 100 Inflamed joints (%) 100 80 60 40 75 67 67 50 50 20 17 17 0 0 Day 1 Group A 0 0 7 Group B 15 Group C Group D FIGURE 1: Changes in the percentage of joints showing inflammatory synovial changes at the experimental sites (the knee and contralateral glenohumeral joints) on day 1, day 7 and day 15 of the experiment inflammatory changes in the synovial tissue of both the experimental and control joints in the different groups is indicated in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the changes in the percentage showing inflammatory synovial changes at the experimental sites during the study period. In group A, the difference in inflammation between the test and control sites at the end of day 1 and day 7 was significantly different (P < 0.02); however, this difference disappeared by day 15. In group B, the percentage of joints showing inflammation was significantly different (P < 0.05) between the test and control sites throughout the study period. In group C and group D no differences were observed between the test and the control joints. On the first day, the occurrence of inflammation was significantly different (P < 0.02) between the experimental sites of group A and group D. By day 7 the occurrence of inflammation in the experimental sites of group A and group B was significantly different (P < 0.02) from the experimental sites in group C and group D. On day 15, group B showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) from group C and group D. Discussion Glutaraldehyde was first synthesized by Harries and Tank in 1908. It is a saturated dialdehyde with a molecular weight of 100.12, and it has two active carbonyl groups. Its bacteriocidal activity is achieved via the alkylation of sulphydryl, hydroxyl, carboxyl and amino groups in bacteria, leading to altered RNA, DNA and protein synthesis.5 Rittenbury and Hench3 first used 2% glutaraldehyde for the sterilization of endoscopic and anaesthesia equipment in hospitals in 1965.17 Since the mid-1960s it has been widely used in healthcare facilities, particularly due to its relatively safe and rapid effect.8,18,19 425 N Tosun, F Akpinar, A Dogan Effects of glutaraldehyde on synovial tissue The majority of published papers concerning 2% glutaraldehyde have focused on the effect of this solution on micro-organisms. No teratogenic or mutogenic effects of glutaraldehyde have been demonstrated, but local toxic effects on the ocular, gastrointestinal and respiratory systems, and systemic toxic effects have been reported by several authors.20,21 The number of experimental studies of the toxic effects of glutaraldehyde is relatively low, however, and those that do exist focus on systems other than the joints. Harner et al.1 reported that when a single rinse is used, the concentration of glutaraldehyde in the rinse basin is between 100 ppm and 300 ppm. If the same rinse is used for five subsequent cases, the concentration of glutaraldehyde in the rinse basin reaches a level of 1000 ppm. Application of a double rinse, or irrigation of the knee joint with 1 l of saline regardless of the rinse technique, decreased the glutaraldehyde concentration to < 10 ppm. Use of glutaraldehyde concentrations of 100 ppm and 1000 ppm in the present study was based on the minimum and maximum expected levels of glutaraldehyde using a single rinse technique for between one case and five cases. The use of samples of rinsing solutions of 1 l or 2 l of saline would represent more realistic levels of glutaraldehyde as encountered in clinical practice. Comparison of the results from group B and group C provided the opportunity to explore the possible similarities and differences between the effects of 100 ppm glutaraldehyde and rinsing solution using 1 l of saline. The significant difference between the results of group B and group C possibly reflects the difference in the glutaraldehyde concentrations in these test solutions. The disappearance of the significance differences between the test and control sites of group A by day 15 is due possibly to the low number of experimental units. The results of the test and control sites of group C and group D showed no similarity with respect to inflammation. To conclude, glutaraldehyde induces a diffuse inflammation in contact with synovial tissue at a concentration level of 100 ppm or higher. The degree of synovial inflammation seems to parallel the concentration level of glutaraldehyde. Rinsing with 2 l of saline could be the safest way to prevent postarthroscopic synovitis. • Received for publication 22 April 2003 • Accepted subject to revision 28 April 2003 • Revised accepted 4 June 2003 Copyright © 2003 Cambridge Medical Publications References 1 Harner CD, Fu FH, Mason GC, Wissinger HA, Rabin BS: Cidex-induced synovitis. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17: 96 – 102. 2 Johnson LL, Shneider DA, Austin MD, Goodman FG, Bullock JM, DeBruin JA: Two per cent glutaraldehyde: a disinfectant in arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 237 – 239. 3 Rittenbury MS, Hench ME: Preliminary evaluation of an activated glutaraldehyde solution for cold sterilization. Ann Surg 1965; 161: 127 – 130. 4 Ayliffe GAJ, Babb JR, Bradley CR: ‘Sterilization’ of arthroscopes and laparoscopes. J Hosp Infect 1992; 22: 265 – 269. 5 Rutala WA: APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control 1990; 18: 99 – 117. 6 Abramson AL, Gilberto E, France K: Microbial adherence to and disinfection of laryngoscopes used in office practice. Laryngoscope 1993; 103: 503 – 508. 7 Borick PM: Antimicrobial agents as liquid chemosterilizers. Biotechnol Bioeng 1965; 2P: 435 – 443. 8 Akamatsu T, Tabata K, Hironaga M, Uyeda M: Evaluation of the efficacy of a 3.2% glutaraldehyde product for disinfection of fiberoptic endoscopes with an automatic 426 N Tosun, F Akpinar, A Dogan Effects of glutaraldehyde on synovial tissue machine. J Hosp Infect 1997; 35: 47 – 57. 9 Cooper NS, Soren A, McEwen C, Rosenberger JL: Diagnostic specificity of synovial lesions. Hum Pathol 1980; 12: 314 – 328. 10 Frizziero L, Georgountzos A, Zizzi F, Focherini MC: Microarthroscopic study of the morphologic features of normal and pathological synovial membrane. Arthroscopy 1992; 8: 504 – 509. 11 Castor CW: Microscopical structure of normal human synovial tissue. Arthritis Rheum 1960; 3: 140 – 151. 12 Henderson B, Glynn LE, Chayen J: Cell division in the synovial lining in experimental allergic arthritis. Proliferation of cells during the development of chronic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1982; 41: 275 – 281. 13 Knight AD, Levick JR: The density and distribution of capillaries around a synovial cavity. Q J Exp Physiol 1983; 68: 629 – 644. 14 Simkin PA: Biology and function of synovium. In: Biology and Biomechanics of the Traumatized Synovial Joint: The Knee as a Model (Finerman G, Noyes FR, eds). Park Ridge, Illinois: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994; pp5 – 15. 15 Soren A, Waught TR: The giant cells in the synovial membrane. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 496 – 500. 16 Stevens CR, Blake DR, Merry P: A comparative study by morphometry of the microvasculature in normal and rheumatoid synovium. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 1508 – 1513. 17 Rubbo SD, Gardner JF, Webb RL: Biocidal activities of glutaraldehyde and related compounds. J Appl Bacteriol 1997; 30: 78 – 87. 18 Stonehill AA, Krop S, Borick M: Buffered glutaraldehyde: a new chemical sterilizing solution. Am J Hosp Pharm 1965; 20: 348 – 465. 19 Norback D: Skin and respiratory symptoms from exposure to alkaline glutaraldehyde in medical services. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14: 366 – 371. 20 Ballantyne B: Glutaraldehyde: Review of Toxicological Studies and Human Health Effects. New York: Union Carbide Corporation, 1986. 21 Tamada M, Sasaki S, Kadano Y, Kato S: Mutagenicity of glutaraldehyde in mice. Bobkin Bobai 1978; 6: 62 – 69. Address for correspondence Dr N Tosun YYU Tip Fakultesi, Ortopedi Kliniği, Maraş Caddesi, Van, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] 427