Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
The Buckingham Journal of Education
…
7 pages
1 file
The last few years have seen greater interest in making schools anti-racist. The BLM resurgence of 2020, global EDI movements and increased mainstream presence of decolonial theorists have firmly positioned structural racism under the cultural microscope. It is an issue for all institutions in the UK to acknowledge and metabolise, but it is arguably most pressing for the education sector. School, after all, is a microcosm of wider society; an avenue through which cultural ideas and ideals can become internalised and anchored to a young person’s framing of the world.
Race Ethnicity and Education, 1999
Our intention in embarking upon the construction of the paper was to review the research that had been conducted in the field of anti-racism (1) in primary and early years education and to identify those areas that require further study. In doing so we were struck by the realisation that it has now been two decades since the legislative framework of the Race Relations Act (1976) and subsequent investigations supported by the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) first focused attention on the effects of racial discrimination on Black and ethnic minority groups in the education system. Framed within this problematic, educational research has thus been largely concerned with identifying sources of 'direct' and 'indirect' discrimination in schools and on finding ways to alleviate these 'symptoms' of racism. From the earliest stages this was paralleled by the development of a powerful deficit model that has pathologised, and sought strategies to improve, the educational experiences of Black and ethnic minority students. What was largely neglected in these studies was any investigation of a 'causal' link between the racialised discourses of education and the processes by which these discourses are articulated and constructed to maintain racial disadvantage.
The NUT is delighted to support this research which makes some very interesting findings about the barriers to challenging racism in schools.
This paper examines the ideology and geography of radical anti-racism. Interviews carried out by the author with anti-racist teachers are used to explore differences between the development of the ideology in London and Tyneside. The paper begins by defining the nature of ideology. It is shown how liberal-educationalism became the dominant ideology of the post-war public education service. The paper shows how a series of crises over race equality in London in the mid-1970s and 1980s acted to delegitimate liberal forms of progressive 'common-sense' and legitimated anti-racist radicalism. The paper then examines the development of anti-racist ideology in Tyneside and suggests how its ideological form relates to local conditions. The paper concludes by arguing that all educational ideology is geographically, as well as historically specific and contains within itself the potential for its own radical or reactionary transformation.
In this article we first discuss the Brexit referendum and its links to changes in the nature of racism in England, drawing on Burnett's (2013) work to demonstrate how 'local conditions, national politics and global conditions' have prompted violent racism in new areas of the country. Within this atmosphere of heightened tension, anti-Muslim abuse and attacks have risen over the past two years, with a proportion of these incidents taking place in universities. We then examine the implications of the counter-terrorist Prevent agenda, arguing that educators' statutory duty to 'have due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism' is in considerable tension with the university statutory duty to uphold freedom of speech/academic freedom; this 'duty of care' effectively requires university staff to act as agents of the state. We argue that this threatens to damage trust between staff and students, restrict critical enquiry and limit discussion, particularly in the current circumstances of sector insecurity that have arisen from a combination of neoliberal policies and falling student numbers. We then examine disturbing trends that characterise students as vulnerable and university life as potentially damaging to well-being, and how these link to anti-extremism dialogue that is expressed in epidemiological and therapeutic language; the vulnerable are framed pathologically, as 'at risk' of radicalisation. Developing the argument on how these conditions present a threat to freedom of speech/academic freedom, in the final section we argue that universities must keep spaces open for uncertainty, controversy and disagreement.
International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1994
This paper critically examines the discursive (mis) representation of ‘race’ and racism in the formal curriculum. Combining qualitative data derived from interviews with 35 young people who were enrolled in a Dublin-based, ethnically diverse secondary school, with a critical discursive analysis of 20 textbooks, the paper explores parallels between young people’s understandings of ‘race’ and racism and curricular representations of these constructs. It is argued that the formal education system reinforces, rather than challenges, popular theories of racism and endorses the ideological framework of colour-blind racism by providing definitions and explanations which individualise, minimise and naturalise racism (Bonilla-Silva 2006). The analysis centres around four major interrelated themes: (1) the individualisation of racism; (2) the attribution of racism to difference; (3) the role of narratives of denial and redemption in the construction of an ‘anti-racist’ state, and (4) the reification of ‘race’. The final section of the paper seeks to synthesise some of the broader political and ethical consequences and ideological effects of dominant discourses on ‘race’ and racism, and offers some concrete illustrations of how ‘race’ and racism could be re-narrativised in schools.
Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2006
What is Critical Race Theory (CRT) and what does it offer educational researchers and practitioners outside the US? This paper addresses these questions by examining the recent history of antiracist research and policy in the UK. In particular, the paper argues that conventional forms of antiracism have proven unable to keep pace with the development of increasingly racist and exclusionary education polices that operate beneath a veneer of professed tolerance and diversity. In particular, contemporary antiracism lacks clear statements of principle and theory that risk reinventing the wheel with each new study; it is increasingly reduced to a meaningless slogan; and it risks appropriation within a reformist "can do" perspective dominated by the de-politicized and managerialist language of school effectiveness and improvement. In contrast, CRT offers a genuinely radical and coherent set of approaches that could revitalize critical research in education across a range of inquiries, not only in self-consciously "multicultural" studies. The paper reviews the developing terrain of CRT in education, identifying its key defining elements and the conceptual tools that characterise the work. CRT in education is a fast changing and incomplete project but it can no longer be ignored by the academy beyond North America.
Analyzing schools as racial spaces can help researchers examine the role of teachers in the perpetuation of structural racism in schools. Based on ethnographic and autoethnographic work, this article offers examples of schools as racial spaces, spaces where whiteness controlled access. It also highlights four teachers who pursued racial equity in their teaching, and how a structural understanding of race was key to their efforts. It makes the argument that racial spaces analysis can help researchers work with teachers to understand structural racism and to better counter it in school practices.
Power and Education, 2014
This paper examines how 'race' impacts upon the lives of young people who attend high schools, in a mainly white British area of the UK. 'Schools Stand up 2 Racism' (SSu2R), a Big Lottery research project, brought together a community partner the Cheshire, Halton and Warrington Race and Equality Centre (CHAWREC) and a team from Manchester Metropolitan University to investigate racism in High Schools. In an area where the population is over 93% 'white British', the sense that 'there's nothing to be racist about in this school' (year 8 pupil) was found to be common. Through the three year SSu2R study, which used questionnaires, semi-structured interviews with teaching staff, focus groups with pupils and ethnodramas, a particular way of 'doing race' in Cheshire high schools emerged. The silent advocacy of a 'colour-blind' approach is promulgated through the popular rhetoric of 'everyone is unique' and 'we should treat everyone the same'. Moreover, the study found that whilst the media and parents are influential in shaping young people's understandings of race, it is a subject tackled only tangentially through the school curriculum. The paper shows how forms of everyday racism are endemic and yet largely unnoticed within these schools.
Organizing Migration and Integration in Contemporary Societies,OMICS, 6-8 November, 2019, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2019
Boletim GEPEM
Politics After the Individual, PhD Thesis, 2022
Ecuador Debate 117, 2022
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2017
Atlantic Studies, 2016
Civil And Environmental Engineering Reports, 2017
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2012
G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & …, 2010
Ядерная физика, 2013