System Description as a Starting-Point for Teaching Simula

Số: 07 /2006/TT-BTM Hà Nội, ngày 17 tháng 4 năm 2006 THÔNG TƯ Hướng dẫn thủ tục cấp và quản lý việc cấp Giấy chứng nhận xuất xứ theo Nghị định số 19/2006/NĐ-CP ngày 20 tháng 2 năm 2006 của Chính phủ quy định chi tiết Luật Thương mại về xuất xứ hàng hóa Căn cứ Nghị định số 29/2004/NĐ-CP ngày 16 tháng 1 năm 2004 của Chính phủ quy định chức năng, nhiệm vụ, quyền hạn và cơ cấu tổ chức Bộ Thương mại; Căn cứ Nghị định số 19/2006/NĐ-CP ngày 20 tháng 02 năm 2006 của Chính phủ quy định chi tiết Luật Thương mại về xuất xứ hàng hóa; Bộ Thương mại hướng dẫn thủ tục cấp và quản lý việc cấp Giấy chứng nhận xuất xứ hàng hóa như sau:

The essay argues for the value of studying literary texts in disability studies.

While getting acquainted with Chinese thought, I found a striking similarity between the Indian and Chinese traditions, and have subsequently decided to explore this further. 1 As such, this chapter aspires to bring together Indian and Chinese Ethics and Metaphysics, and highlight their similarities. In my work on the Bhagavadgītā (Theodor 2010), I have tied together ethics and metaphysics based upon the guṇa doctrine; in this chapter I aspire to take this a step further and highlight its Chinese counterpart. THE BHAGAVADGĪTĀ'S GUṆA DOCTRINE AND ITS CHINESE COUNTERPART The theory underlying the Yoga and Sāṅkhya schools considers nature to consist of three qualities or strands, called guṇas; the three qualities are named sattva representing goodness and transparency, rajas representing passion and desire, and tamas representing ignorance, indolence and darkness. The three guṇas comprise human nature, and they bind the soul to mind and matter, or to the subtle and gross bodies. As opposed to the soul which remains steady and unchanging, the guṇas constantly interact among themselves, and unite in various combinations; as such, sometimes goodness prevails, sometimes passion and sometimes darkness. The three guṇas not only interact with each other rather they balance each other and a variety of combinations are created. In general, the rajas guṇa tends to be over active while the tamas guṇa tends to be the opposite, that is, over passive; the sattva guṇa paves a path which may be considered a kind of a "middle way," and as such it acts as a balancing force. This balanced position does not merely offer

This is a research paper submitted by the author to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies during his tenure as a Nuffield Fellow which attempts to deal with the Company Take-overs and Mergers Code of Sri Lanka, 1995 in some depth. It outlines the aspirations or ‘dreams’ of those who conceived the Code and assesses the scope for adventurism within its confines while seeking to identify some of the pitfalls that should be avoided if it is not to turn out to be a nightmare for the regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Sri Lanka.

Society, 2020

The article examines the body of literature on Leonardo da Vinci using bibliometric methods. The questions of whether Leonardo can be called a "sleeping beauty" in science and what "awakened" him for public attention are addressed. We argue that the first paper that "awakened" a large body of citations for Leonardo's work is in physics (optics), published more than 300 years after his death, and until today physics remains the most cited field of Leonardo's interests in science (based on Scopus database), even though da Vinci left an enormous heritage in different fields due to his versatile interests and insatiate curiosity. However, the Google Scholar search engine shows a different result. Whereas the academic world finds more interest in Leonardo as a physician, popular interest focuses on Leonardo as an artist. The holistic approach that da Vinci adhered to in studying the world makes any attempt to define him in specific terms doomed to failure. Keywords Premature discovery. Delayed recognition. Sleeping beauty. Leonardo da Vinci. Bibliometrics The course of scientific research has contradictory directions these days. Even though interdisciplinarity in research is enhanced, the interdisciplinary journals receive fewer citations than the mainstream journals, and the interdisciplinary studies are funded less than the disciplinary research (Bromham et al. 2016). These opposing trends reflect the traditional tension between mono-disciplinary science and interdisciplinary research that according to Kuhn is the tension that exists between tradition and innovation (Kuhn 1959). Science develops by combining both approaches, the wellestablished theories and the innovative ones, which are produced by collaborating researchers belonging to different disciplines. Each is contributing his expertise to the scientific process, and in this kind of cooperative work knowledge becomes the possession of a group (Andersen 2013). Contemporary science is built of the both approaches, but in the fifteenth century there was little division among fields of