UNDERSTANDING PRINCIPLES AND COMMUNITY
PRACTICES RELATED TO NON-VIOLENCE AND
CONFLICT RESOLUTION FROM AN ISLAMIC
TRADITION
Author: Amjad Mohamed-Saleem (Peace Building Consultant)
Page 1
“Faith is a restraint against all violence, let no Mu'min [believer] commit violence”.1
I. INTRODUCTION
Islam as a religion and a tradition is replete with teachings and practices of nonviolence
and peace building for example: the nonviolent response to the persecution faced in the
first thirteen years of Islam by the early Muslims in Makkah; or by the letters sent by the
Prophet ( PBUH2) to the great powers of that time which scholars state sought peace and
security combined with appeals for voluntary compliance (Crow 2013). “Since its
formative years, Muslim communities have been empowered by various Islamic values
and principles of peace which has allowed Muslim men and women to resolve their
conflicts peacefully and to establish just social, political and economic systems”
(Kadayifci-Orellana 2007:85). They have adapted and applied these values and principles
to unique day-to-day needs and requirements in their social, political and cultural
contexts.
This paper is written to understand broad ethics and teachings on avoiding violent
conflict and bloodshed from an Islamic perspective. This paper will thus focus on the
Islamic traditions of peace and conflict resolution and argue that nonviolent and the
peaceful resolution of conflicts has been an integral aspect of Islamic tradition since the
time of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). In other words, it seeks to identify the principles
which can be used to justify Islamic teachings against violence and a process of resolving
conflict.
There are of course, a few caveats that need to be addressed. Firstly, conflict
transformation and peace building mechanisms are not owned by any one culture and
religious tradition. There is no such thing as ‘Islamic’ Peace building tools. There are
generic peace building mechanisms, tools and theories that have been developed (mainly
from the Western perspective), tried and tested. These should be understood and then
contextualised for the situation without ignoring or imposing cultural biases. This means
that practitioners should be able to utilise religious and social patterns already present in
society and integrate that information with appropriate concepts and experiences from
the West. This paper recognizes that “Islamic culture is not an ‘object’ that can be reified
into one objective or dimension;” (Abu-Nimer 2003, 5) nor is it distributed uniformly
among all Muslims. Culture is not a static entity that can be identified as a constant, but
it is always in the making, constantly evolving and changing with the experiences and
context of society. Furthermore, there is more than one Islamic culture depending on
1Sahih
Collection of Abu Dawud. See “A Collection of Hadith on Non-Violence, Peace and Mercy” available at
http://www.sufism.org/society/articles/PeaceHadith.htm
2 Peace Be Upon Him
Page 2
geography and demography as well as various subcultures, within each community. This
paper thus recognizes that culture is always psychologically and socially distributed in a
group (Avruch 1998). Therefore, conflict resolution practices in different Islamic countries
such as Egypt, Indonesia, Afghanistan, and Palestine, amongst others, have various
differences due to their unique contexts. Such an understanding of culture allows us to
recognize that each Muslim community will have many internal paradoxes, subcultures,
and identities. This perspective also recognizes that each Muslim responds to the realities
and challenges of life in their own unique way influenced by the many identities and
subcultures s/he is a part of. These contextual factors and cultural differences have also
led to different understanding of Islamic teachings and practices. In fact, as long as they
do not contradict Islamic teachings, local customs (‘urf) are often considered a source of
Islamic law.3
In most Muslim communities, Islam plays an important role in social and political life and
religion is one of the key components of people’s identity both as a cultural framework
and as a religious creed. In these societies, Islamic discourse becomes an important
source of legitimacy upon which notions of truth, justice and peace are built. Here,
Islamic tradition derives its legitimacy by virtue of the sanctity of its roughly 1400-yearold rules and customs derived from its holy texts, such as the Qur’an and the Sunna
(Prophetic teachings) which contain sacred truths that form the basis for Islamic ethics
and inform the actions of the Muslims. Hence resolving conflicts in different Muslim
contexts requires an understanding of the dynamic relationship between the Islamic
tradition that unites Muslims and the unique geographical, cultural, historical and political
contexts of each Muslim community that influences the specific tools employed for
resolving conflict in a given situation.
This paper will offer a framework of values, principles and tools to understand
peacebuilding and conflict resolution practices in the Muslim world within this dynamic
relationship. Lastly while presenting conceptions of peace building, conflict
transformation and nonviolence from an Islamic perspective, the paper is cognisant of
the fact that currently there is a ‘politicised’ discourse on ‘Islam, Peace and Nonviolence’
that has been developed largely by Muslim groups in the West to differentiate themselves
from the manifestation of violence and violent rhetoric that has been perpetrated by
different Muslim groups (especially since 9/11). Whilst acknowledging this discourse, this
paper is not about differentiating between ideologies or contributing to this particular
political discourse, rather it is about understanding and recognising the crucial
component of conflict resolution and peace building within Islamic practices and
traditions.
For more details, see Anowar Zahid and Rohimi Shapiee “Customs as a Source of Siyar and International Law: A Comparison of
the Qualifying Criteria” in International Journal of Civil Society and Law Jan 1, 2010 at www.lawlib.wlu.edu/lexopus/works/2651.pdf.
3
Page 3
II. ISLAMIC CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF PEACE
Whilst many Muslims recognize that life in the world often involves conflict and that it is
inevitable, they also understand that peace is the highest goal.4 This itself is seen from
examples taken from the life of the Prophet (PBUH) where he was faced with situations
of conflict as well as seeking peace. For example, Wahiduddin Khan (1998) notes that
there were only three real instances when the Prophet entered into battle (Badr, Uhud
and Hunayn) when it became inevitable to engage in physical contact, but the battles
lasted for half a day from noon to sun set. Consequently when presented with the chance
for peace and to establish the conditions for justice, the Prophet (PBUH) chose to sign
the peace treaty known as ‘Sulh al-Hudaybiya’ despite unfavourable terms to himself.
Derived from the Qur’an and the Sunna, an Islamic conception of peace begins with its
attribution as a Divine name since the Arabic word for peace, as-Salam, is one of the
ninety-nine names of God (Qur’an – Q 59:23). There are many references to peace
(salam, silm, sulh, etc.) in the Qur’an that suggest that peace, together with justice (adl)
is a central message of Islam (Q 3:83; 4:58; 5:8; 10:25; 16:90; 41:11; 42:15; 57:25) .
These references also make it clear that peace in Islam is not limited to a negative
understanding of peace that is often defined in a passive sense as the absence of war,
oppression or tyranny but it actually refers to a process in which human beings strive to
establish foundations for interacting with God’s creation –human and non-human alike—
in harmony and to institute just social, economic and political structures where they can
fulfil their potential (Kadayifci-Orellana 2007). Such an understanding of peace thus
requires a condition of both internal and external order that encompasses both individual
and social spheres as “the individual must be endowed with the necessary qualities to
make peace an enduring reality, not only in the public sphere but also in the private
domain” (Kalin, 2010: 8). This approach seeks to attain peace through nonviolent means
rather than violence. According to proponents of nonviolence in Islam, nonviolence is the
preferred method in Islam to address all forms of violence, as the Qur’an commands5.
The Qur’anic conception of peace has been best put into practice by Prophet
Muhammad’s (PBUH) attitude towards peace and his diplomacy, which can be epitomised
as the “reconciliation of hearts” (Troger 1990, 17). Troger states that “coming to terms
with adversaries and enemies and the contractual guaranteeing of agreements were
corner-stones of [the Prophet’s] policy” (Ibid.), and that he preferred peaceful regulation
of conflicts and peaceful resolution of enmity.
4 Zakzouk, Mahmoud Hamdy (1996) “Peace from an Islamic Standpoint: World Peace as Concept and Necessity” Arab
Republic of Egypt , Ministry of Al-Awqaf (Endowments), Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs and Center for Islamic
Studies and Encyclopedia at http://www.islamic-message.net/admin/Books/Peace_from_an_Islamic_Standpoint.pdf.
5The
Qur’an states: “Fight for the sake of those that fight against you, but do not initiate aggression” (Q 2:190). The message of
Islam is summarised by the verse that supports the concept of preserving life: “And if any one saved a life, it would be as if he
saved all humanity” (Q 5:32).
Page 4
ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES AND VALUES OF PEACE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION
There are various components (values, principles, and practices) that can lead to peace
in human life. Adopting, implementing, and living by these values and principles is a
necessary part of fulfilling the Islamic faith. All of these values and principles rooted in
the Qur’an and put into practice by the Prophet (PBUH), inform the Islamic
understanding of peace and nonviolence.
1) PLURALISM, DIVERSITY, AND HUMAN SOLIDARITY THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF TAWHID
(THE ONENESS OF GOD):
Discrimination based on religious, ethnic, racial or gender differences is often one of the
main factors that contribute to conflicts. The Islamic tradition in general and the Qur’anic
narrative explicitly states that existence of diversity (e.g. different religions and nations)
is God’s design that has to be celebrated. For instance the Qur’an states:
“To thee We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in
safety: so judge between them by what God hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging
from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If
God had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath
given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to God; it is He that will show you the
truth of the matters in which ye dispute” (Q5:48)
“O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and female, and made you into Nations and
tribes, that Ye may know each other (Not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honoured of
you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you.” (Q49:13)
Thus Islamic texts clearly call for solidarity and collaborative action as well. Social
solidarity in Islam is reflected in the idea of brotherhood, particularly in the concept of
the ummah (nation / community) as the following hadith highlights “The believers in their
mutual kindness, compassion & sympathy are just like one body, when one of the limbs is afflicted, the
whole body responds to it with wakefulness & fever"6. However, solidarity and collaborative action
are not limited to interactions with fellow Muslims only. Islam stresses that the source of
creation is one, and thus the whole of humanity is a single family descending from a
single mother and father (i.e. Adam and Eve). Therefore all human beings are brothers
and sisters in humanity.
The Islamic ideal of diversity, pluralism, and brotherhood is rooted in the Qur’anic
principle of Tawhid and Wihdat al Wujud, (principle of unity of God and all being).
Seyyed Hossein Nasr (2003, 31) notes that the term “Tawhid has two meanings ‘the
state of unity or oneness’ and ‘the act of making one or integration’”. While the state of
unity, oneness and uniqueness belongs to God only, God’s creation participates in
multiplicity. Therefore to exist in the world is to live in the domain of diversity (Ibid.). At
the level of diversity and multiplicity, the second meaning of Tawhid signifies integration,
6Narrated
by: Al-Bukhari, Muslim & Ahmad.
Page 5
connectedness, and unity. The interdependency and interconnectedness of humans is
thus a central aspect of this Islamic value and principle.
Throughout Islamic history, the notion of Tawhid encouraged Muslims to integrate both
the individual and the society without destroying cultural and ethnic differences. In fact,
Tawhid reminds Muslims of the connectedness of all beings, particularly all human
communities, and calls on Muslims to work towards establishing peace and harmony
among them.
It is important to remember that the Islamic notion of Tawhid is not just limited to
relations within and between human beings only, but among all God’s creation, including
animals and plants as “human disobedience results in even consequences for the whole
of creation.” (Chittick 1990, 152).
2) UNIVERSALITY, DIGNITY AND SACREDNESS OF HUMANITY THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF
FITRAH (THE ORIGINAL NATURE OF HUMAN BEINGS):
From a nonviolence and peacebuilding perspective, each human being has dignity and
human life is valuable and must be protected. Islamic traditions affirm the sacredness of
human life and recognizes the worth and dignity of each human being. For instance the
Qur’an states, “And if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people”
(Q5:32).
According to Islamic traditions, every human being is created in accordance with the
form and image of God (al Hakim 1998, 5) and human spirit is of divine origin. This
perspective holds that every human being is created “innocent, pure, true and free,
inclined to right and virtue and endued with true understanding about… his [or her] true
nature…” (Sharify-Funk 2001, 279). Thus the idea of Fitrah rejects notions of innate
sinfulness, and recognizes all humans are related and derive from the same pure origin
as the Qur’an says:
“O mankind! Revere your Guardian-Lord, Who created you from a single person, created, of like nature, his
mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women -- fear Allah, through Whom
you demand your mutual (rights), and (reverence) the wombs (that bore you): for Allah ever watches over
you.” (Q 4:1)
This principle recognizes the goodness that is inherent in each and every human being at
birth, regardless of different religious, ethnic, racial, or gender backgrounds (Q 17:70,
95:4, 2:30-34, 33:72). The Fitrah does not judge the wrong or right of human faith but
rather evaluates the moral righteousness of the actions and thus has the capacity to
relate and integrate individual responsibility with spiritual and moral awareness (AbuNimer 2003).
The Fitrah, moreover, recognizes that each individual, irrespective of his or her gender, is
furnished with reason and has the potential to be good and to choose to work for the
Page 6
establishment of harmony. Thus reason must be honoured since reason is the
mechanism by which moral choices of right and wrong are made. According to the
Qur’anic tradition, this faculty enables human beings to accept the ‘trust’ of freedom of
will, which no other creature is willing to accept (Q33:72). Reason is also one of the ways
through which humans understand the divine message and can implement it7 (Senturk
2004, 14) and hence the rational mind rooted in Fitrah is one of the sources of guidance
for human beings. Whilst it is hard to singularly find examples of where the concept of
Fitrah has been singled out as a ‘cause’ for preventing or de-escalating conflict, the story
of ‘The Imam and the Pastor’ (Henderson 2009) speaks volumes to the concept of going
back to the source to understand commonality and to discover common approaches that
question the cost of violence.
As a central principle of peace and conflict resolution, the Fitrah reminds Muslims that,
irrespective of gender, religion, race, etc, all human beings are created in the image of
God, therefore they are all sacred. It also reminds Muslims that, only God knows the
heart of a human being, and therefore He is the only judge (Hakeem), and that at any
point in his or her life time, each individual, no matter what they have done in their
lifetime, has the potential to repent and turn to God. As such, it is a safeguard against
killing, torturing and dehumanizing the “other”.
3) SOCIAL EMPOWERMENT BY DOING GOOD (KHAYR AND IHSAN) THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF
KHILAFAH (STEWARDSHIP):
Peacebuilding requires the involvement and social empowerment of community members
to take action to transform the conflict. “Social empowerment and involvement through
ihsan and khayr are also important paths to justice and peace in the Islamic tradition”
(Abu-Nimer 2003: 55). Kalin (2005) notes that in the context of Islamic theology and
philosophy the questions of peace and violence are treated under the rubric of good and
evil (husn/khayr and sharr/qubh). He adds that, “war, conflict, violence, injustice and
discord are related to the problem of evil” (Kalin 2005, 339). It is the responsibility of
human beings to do good and strive to ward off evil.
The Qur’an recognizes the capacity of human beings to do good in the face of adversity
and evil and to change their conditions as it is stated in the Qur’an “surely Allah does not
change the condition of a people until they change their own condition.” (Q13:11) This therefore
empowers them to change their condition by doing good and shunning evil. This is also
supported by the Qur’anic verse (9:71) that clearly urges Muslims to forbid evil and do
good. The hadith "Whoever sees something evil should change it with his hand. If he cannot, then with
The rational mind (Aql) is only one of the ways through which a believer understands truth and the message of Islam. Other
ways include the Qalb (heart) (Surah 53:11) and the Lubb (heart of hearts, pure intellect, inner most core, through which a
believer understands Truth) (Surah 3:190),
7
Page 7
his tongue; and if he cannot do even that, then in his heart. That is the weakest degree of faith"8, also
emphasizes the importance of social empowerment to do good and forbid evil.
Social empowerment and involvement to do good is closely tied to the Qur’anic principle
of Khilafah (stewardship or vicegerency). According to Islamic theology, when God
created human beings, He made them His vicegerents or representatives on earth as the
Qur’anic verse "God has promised to those among you who believe and do good that He will establish
them as (His) vicegerents” (Q24:55), clearly shows. Thus each individual as a representative
of God on earth (khilafat Allah fi l-Ard (Q2:30, see also 33:72)) is responsible for the
order thereof9 and to contribute towards bringing all creatures under the sway of
equilibrium and harmony and to live in peace with creation (Chittick 1990).
Islamic teachings regard peace work as a collective responsibility. In fact, as Abu-Nimer
(2003, 71) states, “peacebuilding in Islam is based on a framework of deeply embedded
religious beliefs regarding individuals’ responsibility for their actions and their active
participation in larger social contexts”. Muslims are thus expected to further maintain
good and honourable interpersonal relationships (Ibid.). The Qu’ran “promotes social
responsibility and positive bonds between people because of their common ethical
responsibility towards one another” (Sachedina 2001, 76). Nasr (2004, 159-160) supports
this view when he notes that in the Islamic tradition, “human community is judged
according to the degree to which it allows its members to live a good life based on moral
principles”.
4) PURSUIT OF JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND FAIRNESS THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF ADL (JUSTICE)
Peacebuilding perspectives recognize that justice (adl) is central to establishing
sustainable peace. As a form of structural violence, unjust social, political and economic
systems often deprive communities of their basic needs and rights and lead to grievances
and resentment. As such, they are often a major cause of conflict. Therefore, just social,
political and economic systems and institutions are a prerequisite for resolving conflicts.
Justice is an integral aspect of the Islamic discourse of peace, since the Qur’an clearly
states that the aim of religion is to bring justice: “We sent aforetime Our messengers with clear
signs and sent down with them the book and the balance (of right and wrong), that men may stand forth
in justice.” (Q 57:25). Thus the Qur’anic conception of peace cannot be attained unless a
just order is first established. Kadayifci-Orellana (2007, 102) observes that, “justice is the
overriding principle and it must transcend any consideration of religion, animosity, race,
or creed”. From an Islamic point of view without justice, there can be no peace “for
peace is predicated upon the availability of equal rights and opportunities for all to realize
8
On the authority of Abu Sa`id (R.A).
forthcoming p.102.
9Kadayifci-Orellana,
Page 8
their goals and potentials” (Kalin 2010:8). Muslims are asked to resist and correct the
conditions of injustice, which are seen as a source for conflict and disorder on earth (Q
27:52). Justice is the essential component of peace according to the Qur’anic message,
therefore it is the responsibility of all Muslims to work towards the establishment of
justice for all, including social and economic justice (Q4:135; Q 57:25; Q5:8; 2:178;
Q2:30; Q16:90). This notion of justice extends to both men and women, Muslim and
non-Muslim, and cannot be achieved without an actively, socially engaged community.
The Qur’an constantly reminds Muslims about the value of justice, which is a Divine
command, and not an option. The Qur’anic notion of justice is universal and valid for all
human beings with the universality of justice being clearly expressed in the following
Qur’anic verses:
“O ye who believe! Stand out firmly for justice as witnesses to Allah even as against yourselves, your
parents or your kin, and whether It be (against) the rich and poor...” (Q4:135);
“…To fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from
justice. Be just for it is Next to Piety...” (Q5:8);
The Prophet (PBUH) calls Muslims to mobilize and act against injustice, even if a Muslim
originates the injustice (Abu Nimer 2003). The universality of justice for all, not only for
Muslims, is critical for the resolution of conflicts and developing peaceful relations as it
calls upon Muslims to be self-reflexive, self-critical, humble and to accept responsibility
for one’s actions.
5) TRANSFORMATION OF RELATIONSHIPS AND REHUMANISATION THROUGH THE PRINCIPLES OF
RAHMAN AND RAHIM (COMPASSION AND MERCY)
Conflict and violence often involves the creation of an enemy through the process of
dehumanization, where the opponent is stripped from his or her human qualities.
Dehumanization makes atrocities such as rape, murder, torture and mutilation, among
others, possible during conflicts, as the ‘opponent’ is no longer viewed as a human being.
Scholars and practitioners of conflict resolution agree that transforming this relationship
from one of enmity to a peaceful coexistence requires a re-humanization of the ‘other.’
The Qur’anic principles of Rahman (Compassion) and Rahim (Mercy) are two main tools
that can facilitate this process.
Rahman and Rahim are invoked by every Muslim before they take any action when they
recite: “Bi-ism-i- Allah al-Rahman al-Rahim” (“We begin in the name of Allah Who is
Compassionate and Merciful”) as a reminder that actions must be dedicated to God, who
is Himself merciful and compassionate. The centrality of compassion and mercy is evident
in the Qur’an as almost all chapters start with this recitation and God states “My mercy
extends to all things” (Q 7:156). Moreover, according to a famous Hadith Qudsi, God states:
Page 9
“Without doubt My mercy precedes My wrath,” which is one of the crucial principles of Islamic
thought.
Mercifulness and compassion are key qualities of the Prophets as well. The Qur’an refers
to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as “Mercy to the World” (Q 21:107), thus, as the
Messenger of God, he represents Universal Mercy. Besides pointing out that God is most
forgiving, compassionate and merciful, the Qur’an asks Muslims to be merciful and
compassionate to all creatures: animals, plants and humans (Q 17:18). As the Hadith—
“God is not merciful to him who is not so to mankind” indicates, especially those seeking God’s
mercy should be merciful themselves. Thus, a true Muslim must be merciful and
compassionate to all human beings, irrespective of their ethnic, religious origins, or
gender.
The salience of these values, together with the principle of sacredness of life, rehumanises the other by reminding Muslims that all human beings are sacred and must be
protected. Therefore, a true Muslim cannot be insensitive to the suffering of other beings
(physical, economic, psychological, or emotional), nor can one be cruel to any creature,
and torture, inflicting suffering or wilfully hurting another human being or another
creature is unacceptable according to Islamic tradition.10
6) RECONCILIATION AND HEALING THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF AFU AND MUSAMAHA
(PARDONING AND FORGIVENESS)
Peacebuilding processes require reconciliation and the healing of wounds and painful
memories of war and conflict. Reconciliation and healing are key elements in Islamic
traditions of peace. In this process, the Qur’ anic principle of afu, or pardoning (which is
a term that does not just mean forgiveness but something more comprehensive), plays a
central role.
The principle of afu—considered as an act of ihsan (goodness)—is repeatedly emphasized
in the Qur’an which urges Muslims to adopt afu as a way to reconcile. The Qur’an
stresses that forgiveness is of a higher value than maintaining hatred or vengeance as
the believers are urged to forgive when they are angry (Q42:37). Said, Funk, and
Kadayifci (2001, 8) note that, “there is a clearly articulated preference in Islam for
nonviolence over violence, and for forgiveness [Musamaha] over retribution” (Said et al.
2001, 8).” The Qur’an relates that human life on earth started with an act of forgiveness
by God (Q2:36-38). The Qur’anic verse, “the recompense of an injury the like thereof: but
whosoever forgives and thereby brings about a reestablishment of harmony, his reward is with God; and
10
For more information on this see: Ralph H Salmi, Cesar Adib, Majul, and George K. Tanham. ‘Islam and Conflict Resolution:
Theories and Practices’ (University Press of America. Lanham. 1998), and Majid Khadduri. ‘Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybani’s
Siyar.’ The John Hopkins Press. Baltimore. MD. (1966)
Page 10
God loves not the wrongdoers” (Q42:40), advocates sincere forgiveness as the preferred path
to establish God’s harmony on earth.
Islamic principles of forgiveness also urge Muslims to acknowledge their own wrongdoing, repent and ask for forgiveness because the Qur’an informs Muslims that serving
the Divine is the way to implement repentance (tawba), through which “the arrogant and
jealous self, melted in the furnace of self-reproach, reforms in remorse and turns toward
God by seeking the forgiveness of one’s fellow human beings” (Sachedina 2000). Even
the Prophet (PBUH) himself was told by God to forgive in the Qur’anic verse “Keep to
forgiveness (O Muhammad) and enjoin kindness, and turn away from the ignorant” (Q7:99).
Muslims have recognized that “The most gracious act of forgiving an enemy is his who
has the power to take revenge” (Saiyidain 1994). The centrality of forgiveness was
illustrated by the Prophet (PBUH) himself when he forgave all those who previously had
persecuted and fought him, when he entered Mecca and stated “There is no censure
from me today on you (for what has happened is done with), may God, who is the
greatest amongst forgivers, forgive you.”11 It is this attitude of forgiveness which was the
basis of his reconciliation efforts to establish peace between the Muslims and the
Meccans, who had fought them previously, which allowed him to win over friends among
his former enemies.
7) NONVIOLENT AND CREATIVE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF SABR
(PATIENCE)
Another critical value, which informs the Islamic conception of peace, is patience (sabr).
Patience is the focus of about 200 verses of the Qur’an and is referred to indirectly in
many others. It is one of the core subjects of the Scriptures and “is a virtue of believers,
who are expected to endure enormous difficulties and still maintain a strong belief in
God” (Abu-Nimer 2003, 73). The Qu’ran urges Muslims to suspend judgment and be
patient as the verse states, “And endure patiently whatever may befall thee.” (Q 31:17). God
asks believers to be steadfast and promises deliverance to those who endure these
difficulties with patience: “And We made a people, considered weak (and of no account), inheritors of
lands in both the east and the west, - lands whereon We sent down Our blessings. The fair promise of thy
Lord was fulfilled for the Children of Israel, because they had patience and constancy, and We levelled to
the ground the great works and fine buildings which Pharaoh and his people erected (with such pride)”
(Q7:137). In another verse the Qur’an has all the Prophets speak: “And we shall surely bear
with patience all the harm you do us” (Q14:12-13).
Yet, the Qur’an does not ask Muslims to remain passive in the face of oppression and
injustice. On the contrary, it asks Muslims to engage in active struggle (jihad) to establish
peace and harmony. However, Muslims must not transgress in their struggle and must
11 Based on Ibn Sa‘d. al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol II., p. 142 Beirut 1957 cited in K. G. Saiyidain Islam: The Religion of Peace 2nd edition.
(New Delhi: HarAnand Publications, 1994), p. 93.
Page 11
also be patient. The Prophet (PBUH) is reported to have said during the Farewell
Pilgrimage: “The fighter in the way of God is he who makes jihad against himself (jahada
nafsah) for the sake of obeying God.” Taming their tendency to transgress, these
mujahidin (people who undertake jihad) exert energy to overcome the selfish promptings
of their egos. For this reason, the Qur’an equates them with “the patient ones” (sabirin):
“We shall put you on trail so that We know those among you who strive in the cause of God (mujahidin)
and are the patient (sabirin)” (Q 47:31).
Patience (sabr) according to Wahiduddin Khan (1988), makes a person capable of finding
a positive and successful solution to a problem. He states that “patience is set above all
other Islamic virtues with the exceptional promise of reward beyond measure”
(Wahiduddin Khan 1988, 1). He further states that the entire spirit of the Qur’an is in
consonance with the concept of patience. Patience, he states, implies a peaceful
response or reaction, whereas impatience implies a violent response. He continues,
adding that the word sabr expresses the notion of nonviolence as it is understood in
modern times. As such it is the opposite of violence. In this context, “jihad” refers to
nonviolent activism, while “qital” is violent activism. To support this view he invokes the
Qur’anic verse “perform jihad with this (i.e. the word of the Qur’an) most strenuously.” (Q 25:52).
Since the Qur’an is not a sword or a gun, but a book of ideology, performing jihad could
only mean an ideological struggle to conquer peoples’ hearts and minds through Islam’s
superior philosophy (Ibid).
8) QUEST FOR PEACE THROUGH THE HUBB AND MAWADDA ( PRINCIPLE OF LOVING-KINDNESS)
Islam obligates its believers to seek peace in all aspects of their lives, for the ideal society
that the religion seeks to create is not only just but peaceful. Loving-kindness is an
important component of peacebuilding as it helps transform former enemies into friends
and establish healthy relations based on respect and understanding.
Loving-kindness is an important aspect of peacebuilding in Islam that is rooted in the
conceptions of Hubb (love) and Mawadda (loving-kindness). Since al-Wadud (the Lovingkind) is one of the 99 names of God, the source for humans to love one another and all
creation is rooted in the loving nature of God Himself. This perspective contends that love
is the function of human beings. The Sufi poet Rumi alludes to the significance of love in
his famous Masnavi as the attraction that draws all creatures back to reunion with their
Creator.12
Love comes from God and is often associated with peace, mercy and forgiveness and is a
sign to be reflected upon. For example, the Qur’anic verse Q30:21 reads: “And among His
Signs is this, that He created for you mates from among yourselves, that ye may dwell in tranquillity with
them, and He has put love [mawadda] and mercy between your [hearts]: Verily in that are Signs for those
who reflect.” Transforming enmity into love is a sign of mercy of God and emphasizes the
12
First 18 verses of Masnavi
Page 12
importance of transforming hostile relations into love and friendship. The Qur’anic verse
(Q60:7) states: “It may be that Allah will grant love (and friendship) [mawadda] between you and those
whom ye (now) hold as enemies. For Allah has power (over all things); and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most
Merciful.” Linkages between peace and God’s love are also clear in other verses that call
for restraining anger, forgiveness, and justice, all key components of peace according to
Islamic tradition (Q3:134; Q5:96; 60:8).
III WAY FORWARD
This paper has thus focused on the Islamic tradition of conflict resolution and
peacebuilding and analysed some the main Islamic values and principles that inform this
tradition.
Based on the above discussed selected set of values and principles, the Islamic
understanding of peace can be defined as a process in which human beings can establish
foundations for interacting with each other and with nature in harmony, instituting just
social-economic structures where human beings can flourish and fulfil their potential.
Page 13
REFERENCES
Abu-Nimer, M and Kadayifci-Orellana, A. “Muslim Peace Building Actors in Africa and
the Balkans” Peace and Change Vol. 33, No. 4 (2008).
Abu-Nimer, M and Shafiq, M. Interfaith Dialogue: A Guide for Muslims. International
Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) (2007).
Abu-Nimer, M, Welty, E & Khoury, A.I. Unity in Diversity: Interfaith Dialogue in the
Middle East, United States Institute of Peace (2007)
Abu-Nimer, M “Conflict Resolution in an Islamic Context: Some Conceptual Questions”
in Peace and Change v21. N21(1996a): 22-40.
------------. (Ed.) Reconciliation, Coexistence, and Justice: Theory and Practice. New
York: Rowman & Little Field (2001).
---------------, “Conflict resolution approaches: Western and Middle Eastern Lessons
and possibilities”. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v55 n1 (1996b):
p.35-55.
----------------- Nonviolence and PeaceBuilding in Islamic Theory and Practice,
Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida (2003).
----------------- “A Framework for Nonviolence and Peacebuilding in Islam” Journal of
Law and Religion Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2001): pp. 217-265.
---------------- Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion: Toward a Training Model of
Interreligious Peacebuilding, Peace Research. vol. 38 no.6, (2001): 685-704.
------------------- “Conflict Resolution Approaches: Western and Middle Eastern Lessons
and Possibilities.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. vol. 55 no.1
(January, 1996b): 35-55.
Al Hakim, S. . “Islam and Peace” Paper presented at the Symposium Islam and Peace
in the 21stCentury February Translated by Tara Aziz and Karim Crow (1998).
Avruch, K. Culture and Conflict Resolution. United States Institute of Peace (1998)
Bercovitch J and Kadayifci A, Religion and Mediation: The Role of Faith-Based Actors
in International Conflict Resolution, International Negotiation 14, (2009)175–204.
Bonney, R. Jihad from Qur’an to Bin Laden. Palgrave Macmillan, London. (2004)
Page 14
Chittick, W.C. “The Theological Roots of Peace and War According to Islam” in The
Islamic Quarterly Vol. 34, No. 3 (1990): 145-163.
Crow, K, “Peaceful Persuasion or Threat”, Address given at Workshop on addressing
deadly conflicts in Asia-Pacific, organised by Peace Information Centre, Bangkok,
Thailand, unpublished paper (2013)
Funk, N.C. and Said, A.A “Islam and the West: Narratives of Conflict and Conflict
Transformation”, International Journal of Peace Studies, Volume 9, Number 1.(2004)
Gopin, M . "Forgiveness as an Element of Conflict Resolution in Religious Cultures:
Walking the Tightrope of Reconciliation and Justice." In Reconciliation, Coexistence,
and Justice in Interethnic Conflicts: Theory and Practice, edited by Mohammed AbuNimer. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, (2001).
Harris, R. T (1988) “Nonviolence in Islam: The Alternative Community Tradition”. In
Subverting Hatred: The Challenge of Nonviolence in Religious Traditions, edited by
Daniel L. Smith-Christopher. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books (1988).
Henderson, M, No Enemy to Conquer: Forgiveness in an Unforgiving World, Baylor
University Press (2009).
Irani, G (2003) Islamic Mediation Techniques for Middle East Conflicts
http://www.mediate.com/articles/mideast.cfm
Irani G. E. and Funk, N.C. “Rituals of Reconciliation: Arab-Islamic Perspectives” in
ASQ vol. 20. No. 4, ( 1998). pp. 53-73.
Irani, G. E. (1999) Islamic Mediation Techniques for Middle East Conflicts. Middle East
Review of International Affairs (MERIA) 3 (2) (June 1999). Available online at
http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/1999/issue2/jv3n2a1.html
Irani, G.E. "Acknowledgement, Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Conflict Resolution:
Perspectives from Lebanon." Chronos 5 (2002): 195-220.
Irani, G, and King-Irani, L Recognizing the Other, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation:
Lessons From Lebanon. Beirut: Lebanese American University(1996).
Irani, G. "Rituals of Reconciliation: Arabic-Islamic Perspectives." Mind and Human
Interaction: Windows Between History, Culture, Politics, and Psychoanalysis 11
(4)(2000): 226-45.
Kadayifci-Orellana, A. and Sharify-Funk, M. Women peacemakers in the Muslim World
in Huda Q. (ed), Crescent And Dove: Peace and Conflict Resolution in Islam United
States Institute of Peace Press, Washington DC (2010).
Page 15
Kalin, Ibrahim “Islam and Peace: A Survey of the Sources of Peace in the Islamic
Tradition” Islamic Studies v. 44 n.3 (Autumn 2005) pp.327-362 p. 337
Karl-Wolfgang T “Peace and Islam: In Theory and practice” Islam and Christian
Muslim Relations No.1 (June 1990) 12-24.
Khadduri M, War and Peace in Islam, University of California (1955).
Khadduri M.. “Sulh” in The Encyclopedia of Islam. vol IX C.E. Bosworth, E. van
Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs, and the late G. Lecomte (Holland, Brill. Leiden, 1997), 845846.
King-Irani, L.E.. "Rituals of Reconciliation and Processes of Empowerment in Post-War
Lebanon." In Traditional Cures for Modern Conflicts: African Conflict Medicine, edited
by I. William Zartman. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publisher, (1999).
Khan W “Non-Violence and Islam” Paper prepared for the Symposium: Islam and
Peace in the 21st Century.(Washington D.C.) (1998).
Khan, W. Islam and Peace. Trans Farida Khanam. New Delhi: Goodword Books (1988)
Nasr S.H, “Unity and Diversity in Islam and Islamic Civilization” in Cultural Diversity in
Islam Abdul Aziz Said and Meena Sharify Funk eds. University Press of America
(2003)pp.31-38.
Nasr, S.H. The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity. Harper One (2004).
Sachedina, A. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. New York: Oxford
University Press (2000).
Said, A.A, Funk, N.C. and Kadayifci, A.S. Peace and Conflict Resolution in Islam:
Precept and Practice. Washington DC: University Press of America (2001).
Said, J and Jalabi, A “Law, Religion and the Prophetic Method of Social Change”
Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 15, No. 1/2, (2000 – 1 )pp. 83-150
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1051516
Said, J. “Peace –or-non violence in history and with the Prophets” unpublished paper,
Forum on Islam and Peace in the 21st Century, American University, Washington DC,
(1997)
Said, AA, and Funk.N.C. Peace in Islam: An Ecology of the Spirit. Cambridge, MASS:
Harvard University Press (2003)
Saiyidain K. G, Islam: The Religion of Peace 2nd edition. New Delhi: HarAnand
Publications, (1994).
Page 16
Salmi, R.H., Cesar A.M. and Tanham G.K. Islam and Conflict Resolution: Theories and
Practices. Lanham, MD: University Press of America (1998).
Satha-Anand, C, “The Non Violent Crescent: eight theses on Muslim non violent
action” in Said et. Al 2001 Peace And Conflict Resolution In Islam.(2001)
---- “Core Values for Peacemaking in Islam: The Prophet’s Practice As Paradigm”,
Chapter in Building Peace in the Middle East: Challenges for States and Civil Society,
ed. Elise Boulding. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pubs (1994).
------The Nonviolent Crescent: Two Essays on Islam and Nonviolence. IFOR
Occasional Paper Series #3. Nyack, NY: FOR, (1996).
--------ISLAM AND VIOLENCE: A Case Study of Violent Events in the Four Southern
Provinces, Thailand, 1976-1981, University of South Florida, Jan 1987 Monographs in
Region & Public Policy (2007).
Senturk, R , Sociology of Rights: Inviobility of the other in islam, Emory University
Law School Islam and Human Hights Program (2004).
Shirwa, A.M. “Making Peace in the Traditional Somali Way” Peace Office Newsletter
Mennonite Central Committee, Peace Office Publication v.33 n.2 (April June 2003).
Smith-Christopher, D.I. Subverting Hatred: The Challenge of Nonviolence in Religious
Traditions. Cambridge, MA: The Boston Research Center for the 21st Century (1998:
10).
Yetkin, Y “Peace and Conflict Resolution in the Medina Charter” Peace Review: A
Journal of Social Justice 18 (2006) : 109-117.
Sardar, Z, “The Other Jihad: Muslim Intellectuals and Their Responsibilities” in Inquiry
(London) Vol. 2 no. 10 (October 1985),
Page 17