Jorge Ferrús

Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Stomatology III. Oral surgery and oral medicine, Faculty Member

Followers

Following

Co-authors

Public Views

Bachelor’s Degree in Dentistry at Complutense University of Madrid
Master's Degree in Periodontics and Oral Implantology at Complutense University of Madrid
Co-founder and medical director at Clínica Dental Ferrus & Bratos
Implantologist and periodontist at Clínica Dental Ferrus & Bratos

less

Interests

Uploads

Papers by Jorge Ferrús

Emdogain: fundamento y aplicaciones clínicas

by Fabio Vignoletti and Jorge Ferrús

Ferulizaciones diente-implante

by Jorge Ferrús and Antonio Bascones

Avances en Periodoncia e Implantología Oral, 2005

ABSTRACT Se presenta una revisión sobre la posibilidad terapéutica del empleo de la ferulización ... more ABSTRACT Se presenta una revisión sobre la posibilidad terapéutica del empleo de la ferulización entre. dientes e implantes. Tras una breve introducción, se establece una serie de diferencias biomecánicas entre dos estructuras tan dispares como son el diente y el implante. Posteriormente, se exponen una serie de puntos que los distintos autores han achacado a este sistema protésico para luego describir los distintos diseños que se pueden aplicar (rígidos y semirrígidos). A continuación, se efectúa una revisión bibliográfica acerca de la evolución a corto y largo plazo de estos sistemas. Por último, se elabora una relación de ventajas, desventajas e indicaciones de la ferulización diente-implante, para terminar estableciendo unas conclusiones.

Ferulizaciones diente-implante

by Jorge Ferrús and Antonio Bascones- Martinez

Avances en Periodoncia e Implantología Oral, 2005

Download

3-Year Clinical Trial Comparing Immediate Implants with Different Geometry

by Christoph Ramseier, Denis Cecchinato, and Jorge Ferrús

Objective: this study was designed to determine the 3-year efficacy and stability of the soft and... more Objective: this study was designed to determine the 3-year efficacy and stability of the soft and hard tissues at implants with a different geometry that were placed in fresh extraction sockets Method: Implants with 2 different configurations, cylindrical (Group A) or tapered (Group B) were installed. Prosthetic restorations were delivered 22 weeks after implant placement. Each patient was placed in a three-year follow-up program, including examinations at yearly visits including various soft tissue and bone level parameters Result: From the 93 randomized subjects (45 in Group A and 48 in Group B ), in Group A, but not in Group B, there was gain of marginal bone between implant placement and the re-entry surgery, 4 months later. During the course of follow-up almost no alteration of the MBL value occurred in Group A. In group-B, however, the MBL measurements indicated that from the PR visit to the ensuing yearly follow-up visits there was a slight gain of crestal bone (0.28 ± 0.81mm...

Efficacy of a 0.15% benzydamine hydrochloride and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse on 4-day de novo plaque formation

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2005

To evaluate the effect of a mouth-rinse formulation combining benzydamine hydrochloride and cetyl... more

A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla

by Denis Cecchinato and Jorge Ferrús

Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2000

The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between the size of the void... more

Download

Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets

by Denis Cecchinato and Jorge Ferrús

Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2000

Aim: To identify factors that may influence ridge alterations occurring at the buccal aspect of t... more Aim: To identify factors that may influence ridge alterations occurring at the buccal aspect of the extraction site following immediate implant placement. Material and methods: In 93 subjects, single-tooth implants were placed immediately into extraction sockets in the maxilla (tooth locations 15-25). A series of measurements describing the extraction site were made immediately after implant installation and at reentry, 16 weeks later. The implant sites were stratified according to four factors: (i) implant location (anterior/posterior), (ii) cause of tooth extraction (periodontitis/non-periodontitis), (iii) thickness of the buccal bone walls ( 1/41 mm) and (iv) the dimension of the horizontal buccal gap ( 1/41 mm).

Download

Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement

by Denis Cecchinato and Jorge Ferrús

Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2000

Background: Animal and human researches have shown that immediate implant placement into extracti... more Background: Animal and human researches have shown that immediate implant placement into extraction sockets failed to prevent socket dimensional changes following tooth extraction. It has been suggested that a minimal width of 1-2 mm of buccal bone is necessary to maintain a stable vertical dimension of the alveolar crest.

Download

Implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxilla: clinical and radiographic outcomes from a 3-year follow-up examination

by Christoph Ramseier, Denis Cecchinato, and Jorge Ferrús

Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014

Aim: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study was to determine the 3... more

Download

Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a multilevel multivariate analysis

by Denis Cecchinato and Jorge Ferrús

Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2000

Aim: To use multilevel, multivariate models to analyze factors that may affect bone alterations d... more Aim: To use multilevel, multivariate models to analyze factors that may affect bone alterations during healing after an implant immediately placed into an extraction socket. Material and methods: Data included in the current analysis were obtained from a clinical trial in which a series of measurements were performed to characterize the extraction site immediately after implant installation and at re-entry 4 months later. A regression multilevel, multivariate model was built to analyze factors affecting the following variables: (i) the distance between the implant surface and the outer bony crest (S-OC), (ii) the horizontal residual gap (S-IC), (iii) the vertical residual gap (R-D) and (iv) the vertical position of the bone crest opposite the implant (R-C). Results: It was demonstrated that (i) the S-OC change was significantly affected by the thickness of the bone crest; (ii) the size of the residual gap was dependent of the size of the initial gap and the thickness of the bone crest; and (iii) the reduction of the buccal vertical gap was dependent on the age of the subject. Moreover, the position of the implant opposite the alveolar crest of the buccal ridge and its bucco-lingual implant position influenced the amount of buccal crest resorption. Conclusions: Clinicians must consider the thickness of the buccal bony wall in the extraction site and the vertical as well as the horizontal positioning of the implant in the socket, because these factors will influence hard tissue changes during healing.

Download

Emdogain: fundamento y aplicaciones clínicas

by Fabio Vignoletti and Jorge Ferrús