SMADAR BUSTAN
Philosopher, Medical humanities, Interdisciplinary (philosophy, science, medicine, ethics), Research on Humain Pain & Suffering, Modern and Contemporary Philosophy. Experimental and Clinical studies.
Profile :
Philosopher of medical humanities, ethics, modern and contemporary philosophy, clinical epidemiology, philosophy of evidence-based science and medicine. Conducted laboratory and clinical studies (8 years).
I have been teaching Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, Phenomenology, Ethics, Continental French Philosophy, as well as Philosophy of Cognitive Sciences, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Moral dilemmas in Medicine, Bioethics, History of General Philosophy and Philosophy of Sciences, at the University of Paris Diderot, University of the Catholic Institute of Paris, and at Ben-Gurion University.
My research proposes a novel framework of thought combining philosophical, scientific and medical methodologies in order to set the ground for the development of an illness-related suffering diagnostic tool allowing a more thorough understanding and more adequate management of patients. I strongly believe in the use of philosophy for practical outcomes.
Validation of a simple and effective clinical tool for assessing and deciphering Human Suffering in chronic pain and cancer patients to be used by the medical professions for chronic conditions worldwide.
Co-founder at Harvard and leader of the Interdisciplinary Program on Suffering and Pain (http://www.suffering-pain.com).
My philosophical theory on Pain and Suffering was tested :
- Experimentally in the framework of the PASCOM collaborative project between the University of Luxembourg and the Central Institute of Mental Health in Mannheim, Germany
- Clinically at the INSERM Unit-987, Hospital Ambroise Paré, France
PhD in philosophy from both the Sorbonne Paris 4 and Tel-Aviv University, Cohn Institute. Summa Cum laude.
A visiting scholar at the philosophy department at Harvard University, collaborating with Hilary Putnam.
A professional translator (Hebrew, English, French) of books in philosophy and technical texts (EU).
Awards received: Sachs Fellow (Harvard University), ESF Exploratory Workshop grant [EW08-024].
Profile :
Philosopher of medical humanities, ethics, modern and contemporary philosophy, clinical epidemiology, philosophy of evidence-based science and medicine. Conducted laboratory and clinical studies (8 years).
I have been teaching Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, Phenomenology, Ethics, Continental French Philosophy, as well as Philosophy of Cognitive Sciences, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Moral dilemmas in Medicine, Bioethics, History of General Philosophy and Philosophy of Sciences, at the University of Paris Diderot, University of the Catholic Institute of Paris, and at Ben-Gurion University.
My research proposes a novel framework of thought combining philosophical, scientific and medical methodologies in order to set the ground for the development of an illness-related suffering diagnostic tool allowing a more thorough understanding and more adequate management of patients. I strongly believe in the use of philosophy for practical outcomes.
Validation of a simple and effective clinical tool for assessing and deciphering Human Suffering in chronic pain and cancer patients to be used by the medical professions for chronic conditions worldwide.
Co-founder at Harvard and leader of the Interdisciplinary Program on Suffering and Pain (http://www.suffering-pain.com).
My philosophical theory on Pain and Suffering was tested :
- Experimentally in the framework of the PASCOM collaborative project between the University of Luxembourg and the Central Institute of Mental Health in Mannheim, Germany
- Clinically at the INSERM Unit-987, Hospital Ambroise Paré, France
PhD in philosophy from both the Sorbonne Paris 4 and Tel-Aviv University, Cohn Institute. Summa Cum laude.
A visiting scholar at the philosophy department at Harvard University, collaborating with Hilary Putnam.
A professional translator (Hebrew, English, French) of books in philosophy and technical texts (EU).
Awards received: Sachs Fellow (Harvard University), ESF Exploratory Workshop grant [EW08-024].
less
InterestsView All (24)
Uploads
Books by SMADAR BUSTAN
https://www.amazon.fr/lintellectualisme-léthique-Levinas-phénoménologie-Husserl/dp/2870601700/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&qid=1600174618&refinements=p_27%3ASmadar+Bustan&s=books&sr=1-1
Book description (ENGLISH follows):
Smadar BUSTAN
DE L’INTELLECTUALISME À L’ÉTHIQUE
EMMANUEL LÉVINAS ET LA PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIE D’EDMUND HUSSERL, Bruxelles: Ousia, 478 pages, 2014.
De l’intellectualisme à l’éthique propose une nouvelle lecture des philosophies d’Emmanuel Lévinas, l’élève critique, et d’Edmund Husserl, le père fondateur de la phénoménologie. L’auteur fait voir comment doit être surmonté le conflit présumé entre une phénoménologie qui défend la capacité de discerner toute expérience par le biais de la conscience et une éthique qui expose des situations de vie résistant à tout discernement. De la rencontre historique entre les deux pensées naît ainsi une connivence philosophique inédite qui montre comment s’intègrent l’approche réflexive, husserlienne, et l’approche pré-réflexive, lévinasienne, dans le même espace de vie que constitue l’expérience humaine.
L’auteur définit cette complémentarité philosophique comme la nouvelle orientation éthico-phénoménologique. Pour mettre en évidence ce lien, elle entreprend une lecture pédagogique de deux philosophies, enrichie par des travaux récents, français et anglo-saxons, qui permettent de fournir une interprétation renouvelée de la phénoménologie de Husserl et de réviser certaines critiques qui dominent la génération des premiers lecteurs de la phénoménologie en France depuis les années trente.
Smadar Bustan est docteur en philosophie de l’Université de Paris 4 - Sorbonne et de l’Université de Tel-Aviv. Après sa thèse, elle séjourna à l’Université de Harvard, où elle développa une théorie phénoménologique sur la souffrance et la douleur comme exemple de l’ordre pré-réflexif vécu. Actuellement, elle travaille à l’Université de Luxembourg où elle teste cette théorie en poursuivant des expériences sur le corps et le cerveau.
IN ENGLISH
++++++++++
Smadar BUSTAN
From Intellectualism to Ethics: Emmanuel Levinas and the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl
Brussels: Ousia editorial, 478 pages , 2014 (in French).
From Intellectualism to Ethics proposes a new reading of the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas, the critical student, and Edmund Husserl, the founder of the school of phenomenology. The author shows how to overcome the alleged conflict between a Phenomenology that defends the ability to discern any possible experience through consciousness and an Ethics that exposes life situations resisting any discernment. In this respect, rather than considering the historic meeting between the two thoughts as conflictual, depicting a phenomenology that is halted when ethics begins, the author defines their philosophical complementarity under the banner of a new ethico-phenomenological orientation. She shows how their meeting point gives rise to a rather original philosophical connivance that brings together a reflective approach (Husserl) and a pre-reflective approach (Levinas) within the same living space of the human experience.
To highlight this connection, the book follows a detailed pedagogical reading of the two philosophies, making reference to recent French and Anglo-Saxon studies in order to provide a renewed understanding of the phenomenology of Husserl and revise certain critics which dominated the first generation of readers of phenomenology in France since the thirties.
Smadar Bustan holds a dual doctorate in philosophy from the Sorbonne University (Paris 4) and the University of Tel Aviv. Following her PhD, she was a visiting scholar at Harvard University, where she developed a phenomenological theory on suffering and pain as examples for pre-reflexive experiences. Currently, she works at the University of Luxembourg where she tests this theory by pursuing experiments on the body and brain.
Philosophy Papers/Book chapters by SMADAR BUSTAN
Online Paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.13453
Online Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Nup9eMROA
KEYWORDS
epistemology, healthcare, humanity, medical ethics, philosophy of medicine, public health
Clinical Implications: The demand from physicians to be more attentive in assessing the suffering of their patients was introduced by Eric Cassell (1982) as one of the fundamental aims of medicine. This concern, taken into account by health professionals, is difficult to fulfill in the absence of appropriate measures. In addition, the focus on end-of-life suffering has excluded, in the vast majority of cases, patients with chronic pathologies and in particular those with chronic pain whose suffering is part of everyday life. This chapter therefore presents the conceptual shift necessary for the development and validation of a simple and effective clinical tool to diagnose suffering, allowing a more precise assessment and individualized care for chronic pain patients, applicable to other chronic illnesses.
Key words:
Pain, Suffering, Meaning Acquisition, Experimental studies, Chronic Pain, Clinical studies, questionnaire, dilemma, direct or indirect approaches
This philosophical, scientific and clinical analysis of the phenomena of chronic pain and suffering exposes an unfamiliar form of existential passivity which questions the classical a priori supposing the guaranteed representation of these phenomena (Husserl, Tye). The solution to these daily pain and suffering may be found in renouncing to controlling them through introspection and self-representation.
https://www.amazon.fr/lintellectualisme-léthique-Levinas-phénoménologie-Husserl/dp/2870601700/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&qid=1600174618&refinements=p_27%3ASmadar+Bustan&s=books&sr=1-1
Book description (ENGLISH follows):
Smadar BUSTAN
DE L’INTELLECTUALISME À L’ÉTHIQUE
EMMANUEL LÉVINAS ET LA PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIE D’EDMUND HUSSERL, Bruxelles: Ousia, 478 pages, 2014.
De l’intellectualisme à l’éthique propose une nouvelle lecture des philosophies d’Emmanuel Lévinas, l’élève critique, et d’Edmund Husserl, le père fondateur de la phénoménologie. L’auteur fait voir comment doit être surmonté le conflit présumé entre une phénoménologie qui défend la capacité de discerner toute expérience par le biais de la conscience et une éthique qui expose des situations de vie résistant à tout discernement. De la rencontre historique entre les deux pensées naît ainsi une connivence philosophique inédite qui montre comment s’intègrent l’approche réflexive, husserlienne, et l’approche pré-réflexive, lévinasienne, dans le même espace de vie que constitue l’expérience humaine.
L’auteur définit cette complémentarité philosophique comme la nouvelle orientation éthico-phénoménologique. Pour mettre en évidence ce lien, elle entreprend une lecture pédagogique de deux philosophies, enrichie par des travaux récents, français et anglo-saxons, qui permettent de fournir une interprétation renouvelée de la phénoménologie de Husserl et de réviser certaines critiques qui dominent la génération des premiers lecteurs de la phénoménologie en France depuis les années trente.
Smadar Bustan est docteur en philosophie de l’Université de Paris 4 - Sorbonne et de l’Université de Tel-Aviv. Après sa thèse, elle séjourna à l’Université de Harvard, où elle développa une théorie phénoménologique sur la souffrance et la douleur comme exemple de l’ordre pré-réflexif vécu. Actuellement, elle travaille à l’Université de Luxembourg où elle teste cette théorie en poursuivant des expériences sur le corps et le cerveau.
IN ENGLISH
++++++++++
Smadar BUSTAN
From Intellectualism to Ethics: Emmanuel Levinas and the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl
Brussels: Ousia editorial, 478 pages , 2014 (in French).
From Intellectualism to Ethics proposes a new reading of the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas, the critical student, and Edmund Husserl, the founder of the school of phenomenology. The author shows how to overcome the alleged conflict between a Phenomenology that defends the ability to discern any possible experience through consciousness and an Ethics that exposes life situations resisting any discernment. In this respect, rather than considering the historic meeting between the two thoughts as conflictual, depicting a phenomenology that is halted when ethics begins, the author defines their philosophical complementarity under the banner of a new ethico-phenomenological orientation. She shows how their meeting point gives rise to a rather original philosophical connivance that brings together a reflective approach (Husserl) and a pre-reflective approach (Levinas) within the same living space of the human experience.
To highlight this connection, the book follows a detailed pedagogical reading of the two philosophies, making reference to recent French and Anglo-Saxon studies in order to provide a renewed understanding of the phenomenology of Husserl and revise certain critics which dominated the first generation of readers of phenomenology in France since the thirties.
Smadar Bustan holds a dual doctorate in philosophy from the Sorbonne University (Paris 4) and the University of Tel Aviv. Following her PhD, she was a visiting scholar at Harvard University, where she developed a phenomenological theory on suffering and pain as examples for pre-reflexive experiences. Currently, she works at the University of Luxembourg where she tests this theory by pursuing experiments on the body and brain.
Online Paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.13453
Online Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Nup9eMROA
KEYWORDS
epistemology, healthcare, humanity, medical ethics, philosophy of medicine, public health
Clinical Implications: The demand from physicians to be more attentive in assessing the suffering of their patients was introduced by Eric Cassell (1982) as one of the fundamental aims of medicine. This concern, taken into account by health professionals, is difficult to fulfill in the absence of appropriate measures. In addition, the focus on end-of-life suffering has excluded, in the vast majority of cases, patients with chronic pathologies and in particular those with chronic pain whose suffering is part of everyday life. This chapter therefore presents the conceptual shift necessary for the development and validation of a simple and effective clinical tool to diagnose suffering, allowing a more precise assessment and individualized care for chronic pain patients, applicable to other chronic illnesses.
Key words:
Pain, Suffering, Meaning Acquisition, Experimental studies, Chronic Pain, Clinical studies, questionnaire, dilemma, direct or indirect approaches
This philosophical, scientific and clinical analysis of the phenomena of chronic pain and suffering exposes an unfamiliar form of existential passivity which questions the classical a priori supposing the guaranteed representation of these phenomena (Husserl, Tye). The solution to these daily pain and suffering may be found in renouncing to controlling them through introspection and self-representation.
Keywords: Human Suffering; Chronic Pain; Measurement; Meaning; Suffering Assessment Tool; Chronic Illnesses; Philosophy; Experimental Studies; Clinical Studies
Previous psychophysiological research suggests that pain measurement needs to go beyond the assessment of Pain Intensity and Unpleasantness by adding the evaluation of Pain-Related Suffering. Based on this three-dimensional approach, we attempted to elucidate who is more likely to suffer by identifying reasons that may lead individuals to report Pain and Pain-Related Suffering more than others. A sample of 24 healthy participants (age range 18–33) underwent four different sessions involving the evaluation of experimentally induced phasic and tonic pain. We applied two decision tree models to identify variables (selected from psychological questionnaires regarding pain and descriptors from post-session interviews) that provided a qualitative characterization of the degrees of Pain Intensity, Unpleasantness and Suffering and assessed the respective impact of contextual influences. The overall classification accuracy of the decision trees was 75% for Intensity, 77% for Unpleasantness and 78% for Pain-Related Suffering. The reporting of suffering was predominantly associated with fear of pain and active cognitive coping strategies, pain intensity with bodily competence conveying strength and resistance and unpleasantness with the degree of fear of pain and catastrophizing. These results indicate that the appraisal of the three pain dimensions was largely determined by stable psychological constructs. They also suggest that individuals manifesting higher active coping strategies may suffer less despite enhanced pain and those who fear pain may suffer even under low pain. The second decision tree model revealed that suffering did not depend on pain alone, but that the complex rating-related decision making can be shifted by situational factors (context, emotional and cognitive). The impact of coping and fear of pain on individual Pain-Related Suffering may highlight the importance of improving cognitive coping strategies in clinical settings.
Introduction: Chronic pain and pain-related suffering are major health problems. The lack of controllability of experienced pain seems to greatly contribute to the extent of suffering. This study examined how controllability affects the perception of pain and pain-related suffering, and the modulation of this effect by beliefs and emotions such as locus of control of reinforcement, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain.
Methods: Twenty-six healthy subjects received painful electric stimulation in both controllable and uncontrollable conditions. Visual analogue scales and the “Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure” were used to assess pain intensity, unpleasantness, pain-related suffering, and the level of perceived control. We also investigated nonverbal indicators of pain and suffering such as heart rate, skin conductance, and corrugator electromyogram.
Results: Controllability selectively reduced the experience of pain-related suffering, but did not affect pain intensity or pain unpleasantness. This effect was modulated by chance locus of control but was unrelated to fear of pain or catastrophizing. Physiological responses were not affected by controllability. In a second sample of 25 participants, we varied the instruction. The effect of controllability on pain-related suffering was only present when instructions focused on the person being able to stop the pain.
Discussion: Our data suggest that the additional measure of pain-related suffering may be important in the assessment of pain and may be more susceptible to the effects of perceived control than pain intensity and unpleasantness. We also show that this effect depends on personal involvement.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Résumé
La demande faite aux médecins d’être plus attentifs
à l’évaluation de la souffrance de leurs patients a été introduite
par Eric Cassell comme l’un des objectifs fondamentaux
de la médecine. Cette préoccupation prise en compte
par les professionnels de la santé est pourtant difficile à combler
en l’absence de mesures appropriées. En outre, l’accent
mis sur la souffrance en fin de vie, notamment en soin palliatif,
a écarté pour la plupart des cas les patients présentant
une pathologie chronique et en particulier ceux atteints de
douleur chronique dont la souffrance est inscrite dans le quotidien.
Pour pallier ce manque, ma recherche intégrative propose
une approche interdisciplinaire qui s’appuie à la fois sur
des concepts philosophiques, psychobiologiques et cliniques
cherchant à fournir une mesure accompagnée d’une interprétation
du souffrant. Le but pratique consiste à proposer
un outil clinique simple et efficace permettant d’évaluer le
degré de souffrance liée à la douleur et de caractériser sa
nature spécifique chez chaque patient, permettant un diagnostic
plus fin et une prise en charge plus individualisée
des patients douloureux chroniques. En répondant à la question
« peut-on mesurer la souffrance liée à la douleur ? », cet
article aborde les enjeux principaux, à la fois conceptuels et
méthodologiques, attachées à l’évaluation de la souffrance
afin d’instruire le développement de son outil de mesure.
Mots clés Souffrance humaine · Douleur chronique ·
Mesure · Sens · Définition · Maladies chroniques ·
Philosophie · Étude expérimentale · Étude clinique
Abstract The demand made to physicians to be more attentive
to assessing the suffering of their patients was introduced
by Eric Cassell as one of the fundamental goals of medicine.
This call was indeed taken into account by health
professionals but remained difficult to satisfy in the absence
of appropriate measures. In addition, the focus on end-of-life
suffering in palliative care has excluded in the vast majority
of cases patients with chronic medical conditions and in particular
those suffering from chronic pain whose on-going
suffering is part of everyday life. To fill this gap, my integrative
research proposes an interdisciplinary approach that
relies on both philosophical, psychobiological and clinical
concepts seeking to provide a measure accompanied by an
interpretation of the person’s suffering. The practical goal is
to provide a simple and effective clinical tool to assess the
degree of suffering related to pain and to characterize its
specific nature in each patient, allowing a more precise diagnosis
and more individualized management of chronic pain
patients. In answering the question « Can we measure Painrelated
Suffering? » this paper addresses the main issues,
both conceptual and methodological, attached to the evaluation
of suffering in order to instruct the development of its
assessment tool.
Keywords Human suffering · Chronic pain · Measurement ·
Meaning · Definition · Chronic illnesses · Philosophy ·
Experimental studies · Clinical studies
Abstract. Although suffering is a central issue in pain, there is only little research on this topic. The aim of this study was to assess suffering in an experimental context using various stimulation methods and durations, and to examine which psychological or psychophysiological measures covary with pain-related suffering. Twenty-one healthy volunteers participated in two experiments in which we used tonic thermal and phasic electric stimuli with short and long stimulus durations. The participants rated pain intensity, unpleasantness, and pain-related suffering on separate visual analog scales (VAS) and completed the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM), originally developed to assess suffering in chronic illness. We measured heart rate, skin conductance responses (SCRs), and the electromyogram (EMG) of the musculus corrugator supercilii. For both heat and electric pain, we obtained high ratings on the suffering scale confirming that suffering can be evoked in experimental pain conditions. Whereas pain intensity and unpleasantness were highly correlated, both scales were less highly related to suffering, indicating that suffering is distinct from pain intensity and unpleasantness. Higher suffering ratings were associated with more pronounced fear of pain and increased private self-consciousness. Pain-related suffering was also related to high resting heart rate, increased SCR, and decreased EMG during painful stimulation. These results offer an approach to the assessment of suffering in an experimental setting using thermal and electric pain stimulation and shed light on its psychological and psychophysiological correlates.
Keywords: pain-related suffering, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, fear of pain, private self-consciousness, PRISM
http://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/2151-2604/a000279
15:30 - 17:00
The Generation suffering related items: a process integrating consensus experts and Sorensen’s similarity analysis
1234453
S. Bustan , A. Gonzales-Rolan , A. Odero , H. Flor , S. Kamping , F. Anton , M. Baumann
1University of Paris Diderot, France
2Universitt of lles Balears, Spain
3University of Luxembourg, IRSEI, Luxembourg 4University of Mannheim, Germany
5University of Luxembourg, IHB, Luxembourg
Health psychology and public health aspire to find ways for evaluating the suffering of patients. Quantitative assessment of pain-related suffering exists, but methodological frameworks implying qualitative approach based on a direct communication with participants are missing. Our aim was to analyse the procedure generating pain and suffering-related items and explore the validity of their content.
Volunteers were all right-handed and of European origin. After received information concerning the aims of the study, they signed a consent to accept the experimental pain stimulation protocols and to receive financial compensation. Descriptors of pain-related suffering were gathered through 106 semi-structured interviews of 31 particpants (16 men ;15 women), age 18-33 years. A thematic categorical content analysis on the transcriptions was conducted. Verbatim were extracted and classified under categories. Cluster analysis on word of verbatim using the index of Sorensen was performed with N’Vivo12.
The content of each category was validated through consensus by multidisciplinary experts (some have lived the experimental pain stimulation). Then they formulated 70 items to capture the overall pain-related suffering experience. In accordance to theories and with the help of the Sorensen’s similarity analysis, a conceptual framework with different dimensions (physical, mental, etc.) has been discussed and elaborated.
The list obtained constitutes a first classification for laboratory use and a basis for the development of a routine clinical suffering assessment tool. This generation process should guarantee that the items are acceptable, comprehensive and relevant (reflecting the lived experience of the participants) ensuring a content validity of the future questionnaire.
Discipline(s) : Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie : Neurosciences & comportement
Pour citer cette référence : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/28990
Titre : Facteurs psychologiques, cognitifs et les influences contextuelles dans la douleur et la souffrance liée à la douleur
Langue du document : français
Auteur, co-auteur : Bustan, Smadar []
Gonzalez-Roldan, Ana Maria []
Schommer, Christoph mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
Kamping, Sandra []
Loeffler, Martin []
Brunner, Michael []
Flor, Herta []
Anton, Fernand mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Date de publication : nov-2016
Peer reviewed : Non
Manifestation/périodique à portée : Internationale
Nom de la manifestation : 16e congrès national de la société française d'étude et de traitement de la douleur (SFETD)
Date(s) de la manifestation : form 25-11-2016 to 26-11-2016
Organisateur(s) de la manifestation : SFETD
Ville de la manifestation : Bordeaux
Pays de la manifestation : France
Centre(s) de recherche : University of Luxembourg-INSIDE
Organisme(s) subsidiant(s) : Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR
Intitulé du projet de recherche : PASCOM
Public cible : Chercheurs ; Professionnels du domaine ; Etudiants
URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/28990
Discipline(s) : Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie : Neurosciences & comportement
Pour citer cette référence : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/19158
Titre : <the impact of self and controllability on diferent pain dimensions
Langue du document : anglais
Auteur, co-auteur : Löffler, Martin mailto []
Brunner, Michael mailto []
Flor, Herta mailto []
Bustan, Smadar mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
González Roldán, Ana Maria mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Anton, Fernand mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Kamping, Sandra mailto []
Date de publication : 10-oct-2014
Peer reviewed : Non
Manifestation/périodique à portée : Internationale
Nom de la manifestation : 15th world congress of pain
Date(s) de la manifestation : from 06-10-2014 to 11-10-2014
Organisateur(s) de la manifestation : International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)
Ville de la manifestation : Buenos Aires
Pays de la manifestation : Argentina
Centre(s) de recherche : Health and Behavior
URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/19158
Type de document : Colloques, congrès, conférences scientifiques et actes : Communication orale non publiée
Discipline(s) : Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie : Neurosciences & comportement
Pour citer cette référence : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/19140
Titre : Introducing the dimension of suffering to mechanically induced phasic and tonic pain
Langue du document : anglais
Auteur, co-auteur : González Roldán, Ana Maria mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) > Institute for Health and Behaviour]
Bustan, Smadar mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) > Institute for Health and Behaviour]
Kamping, Sandra mailto []
Löffler, Martin mailto []
Brunner, Michael mailto []
Flor, Herta mailto []
Anton, Fernand mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) > Institute for Health and Behaviour]
Date de publication : 10-oct-2014
Peer reviewed : Non
Manifestation/périodique à portée : Internationale
Nom de la manifestation : 15 World Congress of Pain
Date(s) de la manifestation : form 06-10-2014 to 11-10-2014
Organisateur(s) de la manifestation : International Asociation for the Study of Pain (IASP)
Ville de la manifestation : Buenos Aires
Pays de la manifestation : Argentina
URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/19140
Référence : Identification of psychological traits that are critically involved in the occurrence...
Type de document : Colloques, congrès, conférences scientifiques et actes : Communication poster
Discipline(s) : Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie : Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres
Pour citer cette référence : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/24534
Titre : Identification of psychological traits that are critically involved in the occurrence of experimentally induced suffering
Langue du document : anglais
Titre traduit : [en] 2014
Auteur, co-auteur : Bustan, Smadar [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
González Roldán, Ana Maria [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Odero, Angela mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Kamping, Sandra []
Brunner, Michael []
Löffler, Martin []
Flor, Herta []
Anton, Fernand [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Date de publication : 7-oct-2014
Peer reviewed : Oui
Nom de la manifestation : 15th World Congress on Pain IASP
Date(s) de la manifestation : from 06-10-2014 to 11-10-2014
Pays de la manifestation : Argentina
URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/24534
Type de document : Colloques, congrès, conférences scientifiques et actes : Communication orale non publiée
Discipline(s) : Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie : Neurosciences & comportement
Pour citer cette référence : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/19159
Titre : Experimental induction of suffering: why suffering is not the same as unpleasantness
Langue du document : anglais
Auteur, co-auteur : Brunner, Michael mailto []
Löffler, Martin mailto []
Kamping, Sandra mailto []
Bustan, Smadar mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Anton, Fernand mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Flor, Herta mailto []
Date de publication : 10-oct-2014
Peer reviewed : Non
Manifestation/périodique à portée : Internationale
Nom de la manifestation : 15th world congress on pain
Date(s) de la manifestation : 06-10-2014 to 11-10-2014
Organisateur(s) de la manifestation : Internationa Asociation for the Study of Pain (IASP)
Ville de la manifestation : Buenos Aires
Pays de la manifestation : Argentina
URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/10993/19159
Il n'y a pas de document électronique associé à cette référence.
The Science and Philosophy of the Meaning of Pain - Review of Chapter 7, "A Scientific and Philosophical Analysis of Meanings of Pain in Studies of Pain and Suffering" in Meanings of Pain: Volume I, by Smadar Bustan - by Tim Cocks