
Kyle Beattie
Phone: 7802038567
Address: 103 10621 79th Ave.
Edmonton, AB T6E 1S2
Address: 103 10621 79th Ave.
Edmonton, AB T6E 1S2
less
Related Authors
Julie Coiro
University of Rhode Island
Junko Yokota
National Louis University
Adam M Croom
Case Western Reserve University
Eitan Grossman
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
John Sutton
Macquarie University
Eros Carvalho
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Maria Nikolajeva
University of Cambridge
Anindya Syam Choudhury
Assam University
Tory S . Thorkelson
Hanyang University
Jared Linck
University of Maryland
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Kyle Beattie
Developing a Comprehensive Plagiarism Assessment Rubric: Defining “plagiarism” is not simple, and its complexity is too seldom appreciated. This article offers a comprehensive plagiarism assessment rubric from a four-year study of analyzing students’ plagiarism. From qualitative analyses of 120 students’ paraphrase samples, we identified seven plagiarism dimensions and employed a five-point Likert-scale to rank each dimension’s severity. Then, we enlisted editors, reviewers, and research
supervisors to refine the severity of the plagiarism dimensions to articulate a plagiarism spectrum. We produced a Plagiarism Scoring Rubric to categorize 127 plagiarism combinations out of the seven plagiarism dimensions’ composites. Finally, we described how the Plagiarism Scoring Rubric, accompanied by the severity indices,
supports instructors in scoring students’ plagiarism and enables students to understand proper crediting of prior work better when citing and paraphrasing.
Keywords Plagiarism scoring rubric · Academic writing · Plagiarism severity calculation · Ethics of scholarships · English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
Keywords: TOEFL, assessment, authenticity, predictive validity, washback
Keywords: differentiation, learner autonomy
Keywords: ethnography, motivation, identity, Discourse, ELA, sociolinguistics
This paper will attempt to investigate the use of the prescriptive English grammar rule that likes to persistently insist that the italicized words I just typed are not a correct usage of grammar. To accomplish this I will first investigate and detail the opinions of three English grammar sources on the rule of split infinitives. These sources will include the Oxford Guide to English Grammar by John Eastwood (1994, 2002), the Microsoft Word Grammar Check standard throughout the (American) English-speaking world, and the writings of Oliver Kamm, a British linguist and writer of the weekly Times column “The Pendant”; a column that is notorious for its non-prescriptivist tendencies. I am choosing such diverse perspectives on grammar rules deliberately to help discover more about the debate over this rule.
Furthermore, I will be using the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English, and the British National Corpus to do a series of searches across contemporary, spoken, American, British, and academic language sets. These searches will consist of simple two-part split infinitive phrases, the preposition to with a range of adverbs, plus a common verb. For example: [to usually] + [want], [to really] + [need], [to luckily] + [verb], [to barely] + [verb]. From the search results I will descriptively analyze where this prescriptive grammar rule is still being observed and by whom. Finally, I will provide a brief analysis of why I think I obtained the results I did and how they might affect my own teaching practice.
Keywords: prescriptivism, descriptivism, infinitive, corpus
Keywords: cognate, etymology, vocabulary
Developing a Comprehensive Plagiarism Assessment Rubric: Defining “plagiarism” is not simple, and its complexity is too seldom appreciated. This article offers a comprehensive plagiarism assessment rubric from a four-year study of analyzing students’ plagiarism. From qualitative analyses of 120 students’ paraphrase samples, we identified seven plagiarism dimensions and employed a five-point Likert-scale to rank each dimension’s severity. Then, we enlisted editors, reviewers, and research
supervisors to refine the severity of the plagiarism dimensions to articulate a plagiarism spectrum. We produced a Plagiarism Scoring Rubric to categorize 127 plagiarism combinations out of the seven plagiarism dimensions’ composites. Finally, we described how the Plagiarism Scoring Rubric, accompanied by the severity indices,
supports instructors in scoring students’ plagiarism and enables students to understand proper crediting of prior work better when citing and paraphrasing.
Keywords Plagiarism scoring rubric · Academic writing · Plagiarism severity calculation · Ethics of scholarships · English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
Keywords: TOEFL, assessment, authenticity, predictive validity, washback
Keywords: differentiation, learner autonomy
Keywords: ethnography, motivation, identity, Discourse, ELA, sociolinguistics
This paper will attempt to investigate the use of the prescriptive English grammar rule that likes to persistently insist that the italicized words I just typed are not a correct usage of grammar. To accomplish this I will first investigate and detail the opinions of three English grammar sources on the rule of split infinitives. These sources will include the Oxford Guide to English Grammar by John Eastwood (1994, 2002), the Microsoft Word Grammar Check standard throughout the (American) English-speaking world, and the writings of Oliver Kamm, a British linguist and writer of the weekly Times column “The Pendant”; a column that is notorious for its non-prescriptivist tendencies. I am choosing such diverse perspectives on grammar rules deliberately to help discover more about the debate over this rule.
Furthermore, I will be using the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English, and the British National Corpus to do a series of searches across contemporary, spoken, American, British, and academic language sets. These searches will consist of simple two-part split infinitive phrases, the preposition to with a range of adverbs, plus a common verb. For example: [to usually] + [want], [to really] + [need], [to luckily] + [verb], [to barely] + [verb]. From the search results I will descriptively analyze where this prescriptive grammar rule is still being observed and by whom. Finally, I will provide a brief analysis of why I think I obtained the results I did and how they might affect my own teaching practice.
Keywords: prescriptivism, descriptivism, infinitive, corpus
Keywords: cognate, etymology, vocabulary