Computer science

Mobility in mobile adhoc network (MANET) is responsible for augmenting the overheads. Major part of existing literature is based on single node's mobility. Particularly in cases, where more than one nodes have a same target network. In this research paper, a new concept of group registration with group mobility is proposed. Every node uses mobile Internet Protocol (IP) functionality. MANET is divided into groups. Every group has a Group Representative (GR). The GR is a central point in a group and responsible for communication with other groups. Whenever a group moves and joins another group, GR registers the whole group on its behalf. Only GR is assigned a Care of Address (CoA) in the new group. Our proposed scheme saves network bandwidth by reducing the number of messages exchanged. It also reduces delay and overhead costs and reduces the routing table updates.

MANET security is becoming a challenge for researchers with the time. The lack of infrastructure gives rise to authentication problems in these networks. Most of the TTP and non-TTP based schemes seem to be impractical for being adopted in MANETs. A hybrid keymanagement scheme addressed these issues effectively by pre-assigned logins on offline basis and issuing certificates on its basis using 4G services. However, the scheme did not taken into account the CRL status of servers; if it is embedded the nodes need to check frequently the server's CRL status for authenticating any node and place external messages outside MANET which leads to overheads. We have tried to reduce them by introducing an online MANET Authority responsible for issuing certificates by considering the CRL status of servers, renewing them and key verification within MANET that has greatly reduced the external messages.

Abstract__ MANET security has long been an issue for its infrastructure-less nature. The sort of networks gives rise to authentication and key-management problems in MANETs. The absolute TTP based schemes seem to be infeasible for being adopted in MANETs and so are the non-TTP based selforganized schemes which suffer security problems regarding key identity of nodes. A hybrid scheme can serve the purpose. One of the hybrid schemes addressed these issues effectively by pre-assigned logins on offline basis and issuing certificates being online, using 4 th generation services. However, the scheme revealed overheads in different scenarios. We have proposed a scheme where the nodes having common interests, once authenticated through external resources, form a group with a single key shared for the whole group. The overlapping nodes sharing different groups facilitate authentication of other nodes communicating from those groups. In this way the external messages for authentication among the nodes of different groups can be reduced to a great extent.

networks (MANET). Nodes in MANET move from one network to another individually and in the form of group. In single node mobility scheme every node performs registration individually in new MANET whereas in group mobility scheme only one node in a group i.e group representative (GR) performs registration on behalf of all other nodes in the group and is assigned Care of Address (CoA). Internet protocol (IP) of all other nodes in the group remains same. Our simulated results prove that group mobility scheme reduces number of messages and consumes less time for registration of nodes as compared to single node mobility scheme. Thus network load is reduced in group mobility scheme. This research paper evaluates the performance of group mobility with single node mobility scheme. Test bed for this evaluation is based on Network Simulator 2 (NS-2) environment.

Abstract. Mobility of nodes is an important issue in mobile adhoc networks (MANET). Nodes in MANET move from one network to another individually and in the form of group. In single node mobility scheme every node performs registration individually in new MANET whereas in group mobility scheme only one node in a group i.e group representative (GR) performs registration on behalf of all other nodes in the group and is assigned Care of Address (CoA). Internet protocol (IP) of all other nodes in the group remains same. Our simulated results prove that group mobility scheme reduces number of messages and consumes less time for registration of nodes as compared to single node mobility scheme. Thus network load is reduced in group mobility scheme. This research paper evaluates the performance of group mobility with single node mobility scheme. Test bed for this evaluation is based on Network Simulator 2 (NS-2) environment.

Abstract. MANET security is becoming a challenge for researchers with the time. The lack of infrastructure gives rise to authentication problems in these networks. Most of the TTP and non-TTP based schemes seem to be impractical for being adopted in MANETs. A hybrid key-management scheme addressed these issues effectively by pre-assigned logins on offline basis and issuing certificates on its basis using 4G services. However, the scheme did not taken into account the CRL status of servers; if it is embedded the nodes need to check ...

Mobility of nodes is an important issue in mobile adhoc networks (MANET). Nodes in MANET move from one network to another individually and in the form of group. In single node mobility scheme every node performs registration individually in new MANET whereas in group mobility scheme only one node in a group i.e group representative (GR) performs registration on behalf of all other nodes in the group and is assigned Care of Address (CoA). Internet protocol (IP) of all other nodes in the group remains same. Our simulated results prove that group mobility scheme reduces number of messages and consumes less time for registration of nodes as compared to single node mobility scheme. Thus network load is reduced in group mobility scheme. This research paper evaluates the performance of group mobility with single node mobility scheme. Test bed for this evaluation is based on Network Simulator 2 (NS-2) environment.

Following are the multiple choice questions (MCQs) or objective questions from Data Structures and Algorithms. The questions are set from the topics such as arrays, records, pointers, linked lists, stacks, queues, recursion, trees, sorting and searching. Set-1 1. Two main measures for the efficiency of an algorithm are a. Processor and memory b. Complexity and capacity c. Time and space d. Data and space 2. The time factor when determining the efficiency of algorithm is measured by a. Counting microseconds b. Counting the number of key operations c. Counting the number of statements d. Counting the kilobytes of algorithm 3. The space factor when determining the efficiency of algorithm is measured by a. Counting the maximum memory needed by the algorithm b. Counting the minimum memory needed by the algorithm c. Counting the average memory needed by the algorithm d. Counting the maximum disk space needed by the algorithm 4. Which of the following case does not exist in complexity theory a. Best case b. Worst case c.

We establish that the derived Witt group is isomorphic to the usual Witt group when 2 is invertible. This key result opens the Ali Baba's cave of triangular Witt groups, linking the abstract results of Part I to classical questions for the usual Witt group. For commercial purposes, we survey the future applications of triangular Witt groups in the introduction. We also establish a connection between odd-indexed Witt groups and formations. Finally, we prove that over a commutative local ring in which 2 is a unit, the shifted derived Witt groups are all zero but the usual one.

Software-defined networking (SDN) is an evolving technology providing proper segregation between the control part and data-forwarding domain of network devices. The expansion of the Internet of Things (IoTs) and embedded mobile devices increases the volume of traffic at the network backbone and causes processing costs in the control plane. This directly affects the Ternary Content Addressable Memory (TCAM) of the switches because insufficient space makes it more challenging to manage the flow-entries. In this situation, providing services to specific users who newly authenticate after the successful handoff from the previous SDN domain is challenging. This paper proposes a method for implanting the users’ primary domain’s flow-rules in the serving SDN domain. As the TCAM is already suffering from a short space, it is hard to handle the flow-tables of multiple SDN domains in limited TCAM storage. The SDN-based Integration of the Interdomain Flow-rule in the SDN (IIF-SDN) scheme maxim...