How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status/1508210318580674561?s=20&t=HxX4NYyderrStEb0ME4d4wHere's the link to West's "Explanation" which invokes the word "cosmetic" 12 times. Perhaps the Comet Research Group needs to change the name of its blog to "Cosmetic Tusk" since it seems to focus on cosmetic appearances at the expense of science.
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status/1508210318580674561?s=20&t=kEm4vqgq2xd0Q78U3Abn2g"Example #3. The annotated Figure 44c of the skeleton (left panel below) was provided by official photographers of the Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project (TeHEP). It is listed below as the 'uncropped original,' because an unannotated original is not available."
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status/1440097126856282113
https://twitter.com/MTB_Archaeology/status/1440473335687630865
https://twitter.com/petrabonegirl/status/1440833392006688768
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status/1442310167022895105?s=20In their subsection entitled “Comparison to Tunguska cosmic airburst” they make several false assertions. In re-reading it today, another claim jumped out at me: “The airburst generated a pressure wave that toppled or snapped >80 million trees, some up to 1-m in diameter..”
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status/1440097126856282113?s=20@SciReports The vast majority of comments by archeologists, physicists, geologists, astronomers, & impact experts have been positive. I'm hoping to hear from coauthors of the #TEHburst paper. Maybe none are on twitter or don’t feel the need to answer q's from scientists about their paper.
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status/1440377970497966089?s=20It’s hard to know where to start in a critique of a paper so full of data & claims. Kyle Hill @Sci_Phile says “I have yet to see anyone actually refute the 17 different lines of evidence that seem to at least point in the air burst direction.”
https://twitter.com/Sci_Phile/status/1440474182064558081?s=20