.@abc15 obtained what is purported to be a draft copy of the #azaudit report from multiple independent sources.
The draft finds that the forensic hand count was not substantially different than the official results.
abc15.com/news/region-ph…
The draft finds that the forensic hand count was not substantially different than the official results.
abc15.com/news/region-ph…
@abc15 The draft report alleges multiple inconsistencies in Maricopa county's voter registration were found when the files were bounced off of commercial data warehouses.
It also lists multiple areas in which election logs and data were removed from the EMS server prior to the start of the audit. The county maintains that the equipment was handed off with no changes made.
There is little mention of the paper evaluation that took up the majority of the audit's time. Auditors assigned categories based on criticality of what they found.
All paper eval findings were marked N/A.
All paper eval findings were marked N/A.
I'm not kidding when I said multiple sources either. I received this document or was told by someone they had it in their possession by no fewer than 10 people today. It is everywhere.
Unless the draft changes, one of the more interesting recommendations is for an executive level department to be created to handle election audits.
A note. Voter registration data only contains year of birth. So any matches would be on a portion of the first name , possible middle initial/name, last name, and year of birth. That is an inherently soft match. So further investigation is always warranted
Since everyone else is doing it here are the hand count numbers. The POTUS and Senate races do not reconcile, which makes no sense to me since they are literal paper ballots. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
