Skip to main content
Added AMD-Processor and GPU tag, corrected previous edit (only removing AMD tag, see: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/277070 )
Link
small spelling mistake.
Source Link
talonmies
  • 72.3k
  • 35
  • 202
  • 286

I just found that on my (pretty expensive) RadoneRadeon 6970, only cl_amd_fp64 extension is supported. I am getting odd results in some parts of the code (accessing the value of 0.005 actually uses 1.99916e+37?) when running with cl_amd_fp64. Using cl_khr_fp64 with Intel SDK on the CPU works just fine. (The input buffers are exactly the same)

The extension page gives very little information.

What are exactly the differences between both?

I just found that on my (pretty expensive) Radone 6970, only cl_amd_fp64 extension is supported. I am getting odd results in some parts of the code (accessing the value of 0.005 actually uses 1.99916e+37?) when running with cl_amd_fp64. Using cl_khr_fp64 with Intel SDK on the CPU works just fine. (The input buffers are exactly the same)

The extension page gives very little information.

What are exactly the differences between both?

I just found that on my (pretty expensive) Radeon 6970, only cl_amd_fp64 extension is supported. I am getting odd results in some parts of the code (accessing the value of 0.005 actually uses 1.99916e+37?) when running with cl_amd_fp64. Using cl_khr_fp64 with Intel SDK on the CPU works just fine. (The input buffers are exactly the same)

The extension page gives very little information.

What are exactly the differences between both?

Source Link
eudoxos
  • 19k
  • 11
  • 67
  • 123
Loading