Shay Welch
Shay Welch is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Spelman College. She is currently the Scholar-in-Residence for the city of Atlanta's public art project; the project is titled "Public Performance Art as Resistance to Epistemic Injustice". Recently, she was the 2020-2021 Carnegie Corporation and Rockefeller Foundation Distinguished Research/Creative Scholar. She was Chair of the Association for Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. She is a board member for the Emotions Matter national non-profit organization. Her current book is Choreography as Embodied Critical Inquiry: Embodied Cognition and Creative Movement (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022). Her recent book is The Phenomenology of a Performative Knowledge System: Dancing with Native American Epistemology (Palgrave-Macmillan 2019). Her previous books are Existential Eroticism: A Feminist Ethics Approach to Women’s Oppression Perpetuating Choices (Lexington Books 2015) and A Theory of Freedom: Feminism and the Social Contract (Palgrave-Macmillan 2012). She teaches courses on freedom, embodied knowledge, embodied cognition, dance, systemic oppression, ethics, sex, feminism, and Native American Philosophy. Her professional goals are to support and mentor young women of color in Philosophy and to aid the discipline in recruiting and retaining more underrepresented young philosophers. She is especially interested in supporting first generation students and students with cognitive and affective disorders.
less
InterestsView All (11)
Uploads
Books by Shay Welch
My primary purpose is the philosophical purpose. That is, this book is primarily a philosophical venture that is accompanied by a movement methodology as an example for how this philosophical framework operates. My philosophical purpose motivates the creation of this method is to reveal how to utilize movement to explore our embodied practices of knowing. I argue that it is our creative embodied movements that give us the ability to cognitively and critically engage in critical analysis about the world. I aim to provide an analysis—one that blends phenomenology of dance and a “naturalized” phenomenology of embodied cognition and mind—of what it means to develop, articulate, and express questions that reside in one’s cognitive unconscious (or subconscious or nonconscious) to oneself—and to others—through the moving and dancing body. Overall, I hold that through the reading, rather than interpreting, of embodied metaphors, dance can be a clear language available to us. And, more interestingly, it can be a reflective way of accessing the “how”s and “why”s that we have about the world and our place in it.
I focus on how the phenomenology of dance fits within a specifically enactivist camp of the embodied cognition field that posits the mind to be fully and radically embodied. More specifically, I look to various components of enactivist models to clarify how the various parts of an embodied critical inquiry are enactivist. Enactivism is important to a theory of embodied critical inquiry because it can help us better understand how to purposefully engage the body and its knowledges to stimulate meaning-making and meaning-discovery. While dancing is recognized as a mode of artist narrative, there is little research on the specifics of how and what this entails theoretically. My primary aim here is to provide some of those details for an embodied critical inquiry. But, on the other hand, some may wonder why an account of an embodied critical inquiry would be of any interest to enactivists. A theory of an embodied critical inquiry is of interest to enactivists because it adds more material content for their empirical research. While cognitive scientists and neuropsychologists have been exploring brain processes through the use of dance, few have done so with a version of dancing that function in the realm of higher cognitive functions that cannot be explained linguistically. My hope would be that enactivists could use this mode of dancing to explore some of the more abstract cognitive functions that still remain somewhat vague within the literature.
Subsequently, I also attend to questions of blame and forgiveness. This proves imperative to the discussion of rationality and responsibility because blame and the need for forgiveness often underlies the biased analyses and, moreover, preclude the possibility of solidarity that oppressed persons need and desire to overcome oppression. I advocate for a relationship-centered account of blame for complicit women and argue that feminists also have much to be forgiven for given that their analyses are written more from a perspective of exoticization than understanding. Consequently, I develop an analysis of intra-group forgiveness that I believe can begin to restore the bonds between women and overcome resentment that precludes the kind of understanding needed to address the harms of complicity and its ability to perpetuate oppression. Overall, this project utilizes feminist ethics, broadly construed as feminist philosophy concerned with the ethical commitment to eliminate oppression, to scrutinize how women regard and judge one another and to offer a more representative account of restriction, rationality, and responsibility to begin the healing process between diverse and divergent women.
Papers by Shay Welch
My primary purpose is the philosophical purpose. That is, this book is primarily a philosophical venture that is accompanied by a movement methodology as an example for how this philosophical framework operates. My philosophical purpose motivates the creation of this method is to reveal how to utilize movement to explore our embodied practices of knowing. I argue that it is our creative embodied movements that give us the ability to cognitively and critically engage in critical analysis about the world. I aim to provide an analysis—one that blends phenomenology of dance and a “naturalized” phenomenology of embodied cognition and mind—of what it means to develop, articulate, and express questions that reside in one’s cognitive unconscious (or subconscious or nonconscious) to oneself—and to others—through the moving and dancing body. Overall, I hold that through the reading, rather than interpreting, of embodied metaphors, dance can be a clear language available to us. And, more interestingly, it can be a reflective way of accessing the “how”s and “why”s that we have about the world and our place in it.
I focus on how the phenomenology of dance fits within a specifically enactivist camp of the embodied cognition field that posits the mind to be fully and radically embodied. More specifically, I look to various components of enactivist models to clarify how the various parts of an embodied critical inquiry are enactivist. Enactivism is important to a theory of embodied critical inquiry because it can help us better understand how to purposefully engage the body and its knowledges to stimulate meaning-making and meaning-discovery. While dancing is recognized as a mode of artist narrative, there is little research on the specifics of how and what this entails theoretically. My primary aim here is to provide some of those details for an embodied critical inquiry. But, on the other hand, some may wonder why an account of an embodied critical inquiry would be of any interest to enactivists. A theory of an embodied critical inquiry is of interest to enactivists because it adds more material content for their empirical research. While cognitive scientists and neuropsychologists have been exploring brain processes through the use of dance, few have done so with a version of dancing that function in the realm of higher cognitive functions that cannot be explained linguistically. My hope would be that enactivists could use this mode of dancing to explore some of the more abstract cognitive functions that still remain somewhat vague within the literature.
Subsequently, I also attend to questions of blame and forgiveness. This proves imperative to the discussion of rationality and responsibility because blame and the need for forgiveness often underlies the biased analyses and, moreover, preclude the possibility of solidarity that oppressed persons need and desire to overcome oppression. I advocate for a relationship-centered account of blame for complicit women and argue that feminists also have much to be forgiven for given that their analyses are written more from a perspective of exoticization than understanding. Consequently, I develop an analysis of intra-group forgiveness that I believe can begin to restore the bonds between women and overcome resentment that precludes the kind of understanding needed to address the harms of complicity and its ability to perpetuate oppression. Overall, this project utilizes feminist ethics, broadly construed as feminist philosophy concerned with the ethical commitment to eliminate oppression, to scrutinize how women regard and judge one another and to offer a more representative account of restriction, rationality, and responsibility to begin the healing process between diverse and divergent women.