Tarih

The exact date of establishment of the Şarlı is stated as 1682. The charter is referred to as the township of Akçaabat in a list prepared for the tax sharing of 1848-1849. Again, in the tithe book prepared for tax purposes in 1850, while the townships of İskefye, Fol, Oğuz and Akhisar stream, in which Şarlı is included, were mentioned together with the name of Vakfıkebir, it was stated that the district they belonged to was Akçaabat. One of the administrative units of Şarlı, Oğuz and Kızılağaç, which forms the Ağasar valley, Şarlı sub-district gained an official sub-district identity after the 1860s and included the villages of the other two sub-districts. The first mentioned village of the Şarlı subdistrict is Şarlı. This coastal settlement, which is at the forefront as the center of the 14 villages connected here, will form the core of the town of Beşikdüzü in the future. As the village of Şarlı became a town, the town of Şarlı, which formed its center, was shaped by the new implementation instructions in 1871. While it was stated in the Trabzon Province Yearbook of 1874 that Vakfıkebir be elevated to the status of a district, the administrative position of the Şarlı township did not pass between 1869-1875 in the yearbook of the same year. Moreover, the center is not connected to the district, nor is it in a separate subdistrict. Attempts to make the district of Şarlı an independent district was realized within the framework of a series of official correspondence that we obtained from the Ottoman archive documents between the years 1888-1914. Despite the wishes of the people of Şarlı to not be connected to Vakfıkebir but to become an independent district or to be connected to Görele, it was definitively connected to Vakfıkebir on April 2, 1916. In our research, it will be explained the districts that Şarlı was affiliated with during the Tanzimat period and how he turned into a village unit. Administrative problems continued in the Republican period under the name Beşikdüzü. In our city history research, in addition to Ottoman archive documents, research and examination works, Trabzon Province Yearbooks, general population censuses obtained from the TÜİK archive by years were used as a source, and the Şarlı was examined with numerical data in terms of administrative and population.

Sultan I. Kılıç Arslan liderlik ve komutanlık vasıflarına haiz ve hayatı zorlu mücadelelerle geçmiş olan en önemli Türk hükümdârlarından birisidir. Zira Kılıç Arslan'ın yürüttüğü siyaset çok boyutluydu. Nitekim o, Batı siyasetini Bizans ve Haçlılar ekseninde, Doğu siyasetini Büyük Selçuklular ve Dânişmendliler ekseninde şekillendirmiştir. Yani henüz Türkiye Selçukluları büyüme aşamasında bir devlet iken bile Sultan Kılıç Arslan Doğu'dan Batıya geniş bir alanda güçlü bir hükümdâr olmak adına önemli faaliyetler gerçekleştirmiştir. Sultan Kılıç Arslan Doğu ve Batı kaynaklarında her zaman kahramanlığı ve cesaretiyle zikredilmiştir. Öyle ki kendisinin düşmanı veya rakibi olan devletlerin kaynaklarında bile övgüye nail olmuştur. İncelemeye konu olan ve Kılıç Arslan hakkında yapılan bu çalışmada yazar, mezkûr hükümdarın hayatını ve faaliyetlerini akıcı bir dille kaleme almış ve bu alana önemli bir katkı yapmıştır. Yüksek lisans tezini de Kılıç Arslan dönemi hakkında hazırlayan yazar 6 bölümden müteşekkil olan eserinde Kılıç Arslan'ın Haçlılarla, Bizans İmparatorluğu'yla, Büyük Selçuklularla, Danişmendlilerle ve Anadolu'daki diğer komşularıyla olan ilişkileri hakkında önemli bilgiler vermiştir. Eser, alana yaptığı katkı ve yazarın üslubu sayesinde tarihî bir karakter hakkında hazırlanan biyografik çalışmalar arasında dikkate değer bir yer edinmeye aday görünmektedir.

After Seljuk Bey's conversion to Islam, his sons and grandsons began to operate in the region of Mâveraünnehir. In time, the Seljuks moved to Khorasan, where they struggled against the Ghaznavids. This struggle was quite difficult for them, but the breaking point occurred in 1040. The Seljuks, who became an independent state after the Battle of Dandanakan, captured large territories in a short time. While the Seljuks were on their way to statehood, they adopted their own traditions of administration. The old Turkish tradition always maintained its strong position among the basic elements of the administrative mechanism. The centralization efforts of some rulers, such as Tugrul Beg, clashed with these traditions, but the deep-rooted understandings could not be changed. With the expansion of the state's borders, some innovations and changes occurred in the administrative system and the understanding of administration. The Seljuks' rise as a successful state was influenced by the state model and administrative understanding they adopted. In addition, the obedience shown by the ruled was also important in the formation of this success. The main factors that ensured obedience were closely related to a good administrative system. The qualities of the ruler and the progress of the state mechanism were among the main guarantors of obedience. The Seljuk sultans were farsighted rulers who adopted a social state approach, and these qualities enabled them to successfully rule an intercontinental state less than a century after their foundation. Sultan Alp Arslan or his son Malik Shah were leaders who did not hesitate to spend state treasures for their people. Alp Arslan cared for the poor in his country and did not turn down those who sought knowledge. The patronage of the Seljuk sultans not only increased the obedience of the society but also ensured a successful state administration. In this study, the state traditions of the Seljuks and their understanding of administration have been tried to be discussed with their basic features. The changes that occurred in the Great Seljuks' understanding of administration over time and the cultural factors affecting these changes were evaluated. In addition, it is aimed to interpret the reasons underlying the loyalty of various elements that obeyed the Great Seljuk State and the results that emerged and to reveal the relationship with the understanding of the state 4 • Büyük Selçuklularda Devlet-Yönetim Anlayışı ve İtaat Kavramı