Papers by Miroslaw Szumilo
Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Historica, 2024
The purpose of this article is to present the role of Pope John Paul II in the overthrow of the C... more The purpose of this article is to present the role of Pope John Paul II in the overthrow of the Communist system in Central Europe based primarily on the scientific literature on the subject and the published documents. The author’s attention is focused, for obvious reasons, on Poland, as well as on neighbouring countries with a significant number of Catholics within their borders: Czechoslovakia, Hungary and the Republic of Lithuania within the Soviet Union. John Paul II’s visit to the People’s Republic of Poland on 2–10 June 1979 went down in history as “nine days that changed the world”. The pilgrimage was the catalyst for changes in social awareness in Poland, leading to the creation of Solidarity in 1980. In the following years, the pope sustained the spirit of resistance in Polish society during the harsh period of martial law and beyond. Under his inspiration, the church played a mediating role in the 1989 Round Table talks between the authorities and the opposition. The election of Karol Wojtyła, a cardinal from a neighbouring country, and the subsequent activities of the new pope had a profound impact on the revival of the religious life of Catholics in Czechoslovakia and Lithuania. Breaking the barrier of fear resulted in more substantial involvement of Catholics in opposition activities. The revival of the Church in Hungary was less successful, but the personality and teaching of John Paul II encouraged Catholics in that country, too, in opposition activities against the Communist regime.
Saeculum Christianum, 1970
W obliczu represji ze strony władz komunistycznych doszło po 1956 r. do nawiązania tajnej współpr... more W obliczu represji ze strony władz komunistycznych doszło po 1956 r. do nawiązania tajnej współpracy między Kościołami katolickimi w Polsce i Czechosłowacji. Jednym z najmniej znanych i zbadanych aspektów pomocy udzielanej przez polski Kościół były tajne święcenia kapłańskie. Ogółem w latach 1958-1989 polscy biskupi tajnie wyświęcili co najmniej 53 księży z Czechosłowacji, w tym 48 Słowaków i 5 Czechów. Byli to w zdecydowanej większości przedstawiciele zgromadzeń zakonnych, przede wszystkim salezjanów, kapucynów, werbistów i jezuitów. Najbardziej intensywnym okresem wsparcia dla braci w wierze zza południowej granicy okazały się lata 1976-1981, gdy wyświęcono w Polsce aż 26 Słowaków i Czechów. Ustalona lista wyświęconych księży jest z pewnością niepełna, bowiem z tej konspiracyjnej działalności zachowało się niewiele dokumentów na piśmie. Całe zagadnienie współpracy Kościoła polskiego i czechosłowackiego w okresie komunizmu wymaga dalszych, pogłębionych badań.
Symon Petlura. Przywódca niepodległej Ukrainy, red. M. Szumiło, Warszawa 2021.
Abstract
The article deals with one of the fundamental issues in assessing Petliura as a politici... more Abstract
The article deals with one of the fundamental issues in assessing Petliura as a politician and leader of a nation fighting for freedom, i.e. the rationality of his decisions and actions. To what extent they resulted from his revolutionary zealand patriotic romanticism, and to what extent they resulted from a cold and accurate assessment of reality, i.e. political realism. The text presents the clash between these two elements of Petliura’s political personality, referring to his own statements and the findings and opinions of historians.
Symon Petliura in his political activity undoubtedly underwent a characteristic ideological evolution – from socialist radicalism to national solidarity. The main stage of this evolution took place before the First World War. When two currents clashed within the Ukrainian Revolutionary Party: internationalist and national-liberation, he opted for the latter. After the outbreak of World War I he became pro-Russian, the result of cold political calculations.
As secretary for military affairs in the government of the Ukrainian People’s Republic, he sought to create a strong army and rejected utopian proposals for a compromise with the Bolsheviks. Remaining consistent in his orientation towards the Entente states, he opposed the alliance between Hetman Skoropadski and Germany. As a member of the UPR Directorate, he strove to reach an agreement with France, and when it turned out to be impossible, he focused on rapprochement with Poland. He knew perfectly well that only an alliance with Poland
would lead Ukraine out of the diplomatic vacuum created around it by Western countries. The Polish-Ukrainian alliance in 1920 did not lead to the maintenance of Ukraine’s independence, but it did uphold the Ukrainian cause. Symon Petliura undoubtedly played the greatest role in the Ukrainian struggle for independence in 1917–1920, and later became the leading statesman in Ukrainian political exile.
Wyniki wyborów prezydenckich na Ukrainie w 2004 r. i rezultaty badá n opinii publicznej wskazuj ˛... more Wyniki wyborów prezydenckich na Ukrainie w 2004 r. i rezultaty badá n opinii publicznej wskazuj ˛ a wyra´zniewyra´znie na ogromn ˛ a rol˛ e, jak ˛ a odegrał w czasie "pomará nczowej rewolucji" kontekst historyczno-kulturowy. Społeczé nstwo ukraí nskie podzieliło si˛ e niemal po równo na dwa obozy: "pomará nczowych"-zwolenników rewolucji i "niebieskich"-zwolenników kontrrewolucji. Ten podział miał w du˙ zej mierze charakter terytorialny. Zachód i centrum kraju głosowały w wi˛ ekszo´sciekszo´sci na Wiktora Juszczenk˛ e, za´sza´s wschód i południe na Wiktora Janukowycza. Postawy i zachowania zwolenników rewolucji i ich przeciwników były zdeterminowane przez nast˛ epuj ˛ ace czynniki: to˙ zsamo´s´czsamo´s´zsamo´s´c narodow ˛ a, j˛ ezyk, wyznanie, identyfikacj˛ e ojczyzny, tradycj˛ e i pami˛ e´ce´c historyczn ˛ a. W rzeczywisto´scirzeczywisto´sci Ukraina pod wzgl˛ edem historycznym i kulturowym dzieli si˛ e na trzy regiony: 1) Zachód pozostaj ˛ acy do 1939 r...
2. Annus Mirabilis 1989 and Slovakia: From a Totalitarian Regime to Democracy, ed. Beata Katebova-Blehova, Bratislava 2021, 2021
The true nature of the political changes of 1989 in Poland is still a subject of discussion among... more The true nature of the political changes of 1989 in Poland is still a subject of discussion among academics and journalists. Public consciousness for years has entertained various myths centered on the “round table”. The “white legend” has it that the communists agreed, of their own free will, to accede power to the opposition. The “black legend” holds that the communists made a pact with the leaders of Solidarity to share power under the guise of building a democracy, but without asking the public their opinion.
The purpose of this article is to analyze the successive stages of the transformation in Poland in order to answer the question: was it more of a planned reform of the system or a revolution? The key issue will be to assess the impact of individual factors—the communist authorities, the opposition elite, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, and grassroots pressure from society—on the course of transformation processes.
MIROSŁAW SZUMIŁO "Żydokomuna" w aparacie władzy "Polski Ludowej". Mit czy rzeczywistość? Temat "ż... more MIROSŁAW SZUMIŁO "Żydokomuna" w aparacie władzy "Polski Ludowej". Mit czy rzeczywistość? Temat "żydokomuny", czyli licznej obecności Żydów w strukturach władzy komunistycznej w Polsce po 1944 r., wciąż wywołuje silne emocje. Mimo wielu publikacji o charakterze monograficznym lub przyczynkarskim, obejmujących różne elementy tego problemu, nie doczekaliśmy się całościowego i dogłębnego opracowania tematu. Pierwszą, nieudaną próbą takiego opracowania była książka Żydokomuna. Interpretacje historyczne autorstwa znanego socjologa Pawła Śpiewaka 1. Niestety, jest to bardziej popularny esej niż praca naukowa. Autorowi należy jednak oddać to, że niejako "odczarował" temat, dzięki czemu przestał on być historycznym tabu. W niniejszym tekście postaram się podsumować dotychczasowe wyniki badań nad "żydokomuną". Wspierałem się publikacjami naukowymi i źródłowymi oraz częściowo efektami własnych badań nad udziałem Żydów w elicie władzy "Polski Ludowej". Na tej podstawie spróbuję zweryfikować, jak dalece mit pokrywał się z rzeczywistością. Nie zważam przy tym na opinie wyrażane przez niektórych historyków, którzy uważają, że samo liczenie Żydów w aparacie władzy komunistycznej jest czynnością o charakterze rasistowskim 2 i "ulubionym zajęciem antysemitów" 3. Na początku przypomnę, na czym polegał mit "żydokomuny", skąd się wziął i jaki miał wpływ na postawy antysemickie w polskim społeczeństwie. Następnie scharakteryzuję liczebność i wpływy Żydów w strukturach władzy komunistycznej w okresach stalinowskim i gomułkowskim, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem aparatu bezpieczeństwa. Na koniec przyjrzę się przyczynom zaangażowania Żydów po stronie komunistów oraz ich awansu w aparacie władzy, a także problemowi ich tożsamości narodowej. Wobec wszystkich osób pochodzenia żydowskiego używam terminu "Żydzi", bez względu na stopień ich asymilacji lub też identyfikacji z narodem żydowskim. Ludzie
Prace Historyczne, 2017
In the years 1948-1956, the system of totalitarian Communist rule in Poland entered a phase of st... more In the years 1948-1956, the system of totalitarian Communist rule in Poland entered a phase of stabilization. That did not mean, however, any stagnation of personnel movement within the power elite. The Polish United Workers' Party (PUWP) was characterized by a very high circulation of people inside its elite. As a result, in the years 1949-1955 two-thirds of the elite were changed. In this text we describe the mechanisms of personnel changes, the role of former activists of the Polish Socialist Party in the elite of the PUWP, the frequency and scale of staff movements, the criteria for getting promoted into the elite and reasons for being degraded. The personnel changes were not groundbreaking as regards quality. The dominant positions still belonged to representatives of a single generation: the former activists of the Communist Party of Poland. The basic criteria for the promotion were, in fact, ideological factors and personal relations. Professionalism and experience played a secondary role.
Res Historica, 2018
Problem bardzo niskiego udziału kobiet w elicie władzy w Polsce w latach 1944-1989, a zwłaszcza p... more Problem bardzo niskiego udziału kobiet w elicie władzy w Polsce w latach 1944-1989, a zwłaszcza przyczyn takiej sytuacji, nie doczekał się jeszcze pogłębionej analizy. Najmniej rozpoznana jest kwestia roli kobiet jako "szarych eminencji", wywierających nieformalny wpływ na procesy decyzyjne. W niniejszym artykule przedstawiono sylwetki sześciu komunistek, których działalność w roli "szarych eminencji" znajduje największe potwierdzenie w dostępnych źródłach. Trzy z nich pracowały w różnych segmentach władzy państwowej (Julia Bristiger, Maria Wierna, Julia Minc), dwie w centralnym aparacie partyjnym (Zofia Gomułkowa, Tedo ra Feder), zaś jedna stanowi przykład wpływowej kobiety usadowionej w terenowym aparacie partyjnym szczebla wojewódzkiego (Sara Nomberg-Przytyk). Analiza tych sześciu przypadków prowadzi do wniosku, że o nieformalnej silnej pozycji zajmowanej przez te kobiety w komunistycznej elicie władzy decydowały następujące czynniki: posiadane doświadczenie, staż partyjny, wykształcenie i umiejętności, a także pozycja męża jako działacza partyjnego lub znajomości wśród innych członków elity władzy.
Kwartalnik Historyczny, 2014
W świetle oficjalnie głoszonej ideologii władza w Polsce Ludowej miała należeć do tzw. mas pracuj... more W świetle oficjalnie głoszonej ideologii władza w Polsce Ludowej miała należeć do tzw. mas pracujących. W rzeczywistości koncentrowała się w rękach wąskiej elity partii rządzącej, czyli kierownictwa Polskiej Partii Robotniczej, które tworzyli członkowie Biura Politycznego i Sekretariatu Komitetu Centralnego. W niniejszym tekście postaram się scharakteryzować skład osobowy centralnych władz partyjnych, a następnie nakreślić portret zbiorowy 21 komunistów tworzących elitę władzy w latach 1944-1948 1. W tym celu należy poddać analizie cechy społeczno-demograficzne tej grupy: płeć, wiek, miejsce urodzenia, pochodzenie społeczne i etniczne, wykształcenie oraz przedstawić przebieg kariery w ruchu komunistycznym ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem losów i działalności w latach II wojny światowej. Ponadto spróbuję określić kryteria i mechanizmy awansu do wąskiej elity partyjnej. Podstawowym źródłem do naszkicowania portretu zbiorowego są akta osobowe działaczy partyjnych przechowywane w Archiwum Akt Nowych oraz "kominternowskie" teczki personalne, znajdujące się obecnie w Rosyjskim Państwowym Archiwum Historii Społeczno-Politycznej (Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj arhiv so-cial´no-političeskoj istorii-RGASPI) 2. Jako uzupełnienie archiwaliów
Polish-Jewish Studies, 2021
The article describes the participation of Jews in the revolutionary movement in Russia (especial... more The article describes the participation of Jews in the revolutionary movement in Russia (especially in Poland) before World War I; the social structure of the Jewish population in Poland; the path of the splinter groups from Jewish left-wing parties to the Communist Workers’ Party of Poland; the attitude of Jewish radicals towards the Bolshevik aggression against Poland in 1920; the number of Jews in the Polish Communist movement, their identity, and their motives for joining the Communist movement.
The share of Jews in the Polish Communist movement was several times higher than the share of the Jewish population in the society of the Second Polish Republic. Jews made up about 30 percent of all KPP members, and in the party youth group the figure reached as high as 50 percent. Activists of Jewish origin made up about 40 percent of the party elite, and they even came to predominate in the middle ranks.
The reasons for the significant participation of Jews in the Communist movement cannot be explained (which is often done) solely by their difficult social situation and discrimination. Rather, it was a combination of many factors of a different nature, both universal and specifically Jewish.
Operation Danube Reconsidered. The International Aspects of the Czechoslovak 1968 Crisis, ed. Jakub Drabik, Ibidem Verlag, Stuttgart 2021, 2021
The position of Władysław Gomułka and the authorities of the People’s
Republic of Poland (PRP) to... more The position of Władysław Gomułka and the authorities of the People’s
Republic of Poland (PRP) towards the “Prague Spring” and the intervention
of the Warsaw Pact in Czechoslovakia has already been discussed in
numerous publications. However, the reactions of Polish society are not so well known. Therefore, in this article I shall focus on the latter issue,
presenting briefly the position of the leadership of the Polish United
Workers’ Party (PUWP) and the propaganda campaign in the press.
"Komunizm: system -ludzie -dokumentacja rocznik naukowy", 2015, nr 4, 2015
Do szczególnie cennych kategorii źródeł, pozwalających badaczom na opisywanie mechanizmów funkcjo... more Do szczególnie cennych kategorii źródeł, pozwalających badaczom na opisywanie mechanizmów funkcjonowania elity PZPR i
przyjrzenie się sylwetkom konkretnych działaczy, są dokumenty
wytworzone przez sowieckich dyplomatów rezydujących w Polsce.
Dostęp do nich jest bardzo utrudniony, toteż wprowadzanie do
obiegu naukowego każdych, choćby wycinkowych, fragmentów tej
dokumentacji stanowi istotny wkład do naszego stanu wiedzy w
tej dziedzinie. W tym miejscu chciałbym udostępnić czytelnikom
garść dokumentów dyplomacji sowieckiej dotyczących przede
wszystkim podziałów wewnętrznych w elicie PZPR w okresie „małej
stabilizacji” (w latach 1959–1964). Poruszana w nich problematyka, choć była już przedmiotem badań naukowych, wciąż nie została jeszcze w pełni rozpoznana i opisana.
Partia, państwo, społeczeństwo, pod red. K. Rokickiego, Warszawa 2016.
First Secretaries of Provincial Committees of the Polish United Workers’
Party in the period of ... more First Secretaries of Provincial Committees of the Polish United Workers’
Party in the period of 1948–1970 – a sociological portrait:
The purpose of the article is to outline the collective sociological portrait of 92 people who performed the function of First Secretaries of Provincial Committees of the Polish United Worker’s Party in the period from December 1948 to December 1970. For this purpose, the following sociodemographic characteristics have been analysed: gender, age, social and ethnic origin, general and political education, as well as very significant generational differences.
By the end of the 1950s, the group in question was dominated by pre-war communists. “The Polish October” of 1956 in fact did not constitute a genuine staffing breakthrough. In the 1960s, this group was gradually joined by representatives of younger generations, who received better
education than their older comrades. Extensive replacement of the party elite, both quantitative, as well as qualitative, was brought about as late as by Edward Gierek taking over the power in December 1970.
Elity komunistyczne w Polsce, red. M. Szumiło i M. Żukowski, Warszawa-Lublin 2015
The aim of this article is to define personal composition and internal structures of the elites ... more The aim of this article is to define personal composition and internal structures of the elites of the Polish Workers’ Party and the Polish United Workers’ Party between 1944 and 1970. The previously existing concepts on isolating the elites have undergone a critical
analysis. The formal elites have been characterised in a general manner, focusing on a detailed definition of the actual elites of the PWP and PUWP, which to a large extent can be identified with the elites of the communist authorities of Poland. The article discusses
the leadership of the party (Political Bureau and Secretariat of the Central Committee), combining the entire elite, and four segments of the elites which were subjected to it: the elites of the Party apparatus, the elites of the state, the elites of national security apparatus and the elites of the Polish Army. In addition, the problem of functioning of the latent elites, the crypto-communists and “grey eminences”, was also addressed.
"Res Historica", nr 45, 2018
The problem of the very low participation of women in the power elite in Poland in 1944–1989, and... more The problem of the very low participation of women in the power elite in Poland in 1944–1989, and in particular the reasons for this situation, has not been thoroughly researched. The least studied is the issue of the role of women as “gray eminence”, exerting informal influence on decision-making processes. This text presents the profiles of six communist women, whose activity as “gray eminence” finds the greatest confirmation in available sources. Three of them worked in various
segments of state power (Julia Bristiger, Maria Wierna, Julia Minc), two in the central party
apparatus (Zofia Gomułkowa, Teodora Feder), and one is an example of an influential woman seated in the regional party apparatus of the provincial level (Sara Nomberg-Przytyk).
The analysis of these six cases leads to the conclusion that the informal strength of these women in the communist power elite was influenced by the following factors: gained experience, length of party membership, education and skills, and the position of a husband as a party activist or acquaintance among other members of the power elite.
"Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Historyczne", 2017
THE ELITE OF THE POLISH UNITED WORKERS' PARTY IN THE YEARS 1948-1955: MECHANISMS OF PERSONNEL CHA... more THE ELITE OF THE POLISH UNITED WORKERS' PARTY IN THE YEARS 1948-1955: MECHANISMS OF PERSONNEL CHANGES In the years 1948-1956, the system of totalitarian Communist rule in Poland entered a phase of stabilization. That did not mean, however, any stagnation of personnel movement within the power elite. The Polish United Workers' Party (PUWP) was characterized by a very high circulation of people inside its elite. As a result, in the years 1949-1955 two-thirds of the elite were changed. In this text we describe the mechanisms of personnel changes, the role of former activists of the Polish Socialist Party in the elite of the PUWP, the frequency and scale of staff movements, the criteria for getting promoted into the elite and reasons for being degraded. The personnel changes were not groundbreaking as regards quality. The dominant positions still belonged to representatives of a single generation: the former activists of the Communist Party of Poland. The basic criteria for the promotion were, in fact, ideological factors and personal relations. Professionalism and experience played a secondary role.
"Komunizm: system -ludzie -dokumentacja" 2013 , nr 2., 2013
It is well-established in Polish historiography
the view that Edward Gierek assumed the function ... more It is well-established in Polish historiography
the view that Edward Gierek assumed the function of the first secretary of the Central Committee of PZPR in December 1970 was primarily due to his earlier connections with Moscow. Our knowledge on this subject was based mainly, however, on guesses and accounts of witnesses of his meetings with the Soviets.
Records of conversations of Edward Gierek with Soviet diplomats have been preserved in the Russian State Archive of Social and Political History (RGASPI).
"Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość" nr 32, 2018
“Judeo-Communism” in the Power Apparatus of “People’s Poland”. Myth or Reality?
The quantitati... more “Judeo-Communism” in the Power Apparatus of “People’s Poland”. Myth or Reality?
The quantitative and qualitative participation of communist Jews in the power apparatus of “People’s Poland” was exceptionally large, and in some segments (the central party apparatus, secret police, propaganda) even dominating. Jewish minority enjoyed autonomy and relative privileges in Poland. It was in fact a mapping of the situation from the Soviet Union of the twenties. The purpose of this article is to summarise the results of research on the involvement of Jews in the apparatus of communist authorities in Poland so far, based on scientific and source publications, and partly the author’s own research in this area.
The article reminds us of the myth of “Judeo-Communism” (żydokomuna) in the power apparatus of “People’s Poland”, where it came from and what was its influence on anti-Semitic attitudes in Polish society. Next, the number and influence of Jews in the structures of the communist authorities in the Stalinist period and in the times of Gomułka is characterised with particular emphasis on the security apparatus. It also looks into the reasons for such involvement of Jewish on the communist side and their promotion in the power apparatus, and the problem of their national identity. The article is an attempt to verify the myth, i.e. to determine how much it coincided with reality.
Kierownictwo PZPR w latach 1971-1980, [w:] PRL na pochylni (1975-1980), red. Marcin Bukała, Dariusz Iwaneczko, Rzeszów 2017., 2017
Leadership of the Polish United Workers’ Party between 1971 and 1980
Summary
The article examines... more Leadership of the Polish United Workers’ Party between 1971 and 1980
Summary
The article examines the personnel and the functioning mechanisms of the administration of the Polish United Workers Party (Political Bureau and Front Office of the Central Committee) in the seventies (from the 6th convention in December 1971 to Edward Gierek’s leaving the position of the 1st secretary of Central Committee on 8th September 1980). It outlines a group portrait of 30 members of administration, considering their primary social-demographic factors, generational affiliation and career paths.
Based on the analysis it can be assumed that the leadership of the Polish United Workers
Party between 1971 and 1980 was made out of activists from a similar social background (mainly working class and peasant backgrounds), but it was also diverse in terms of generations and education level. The leadership was made out of people doing careers in the party apparatus and at the same time associated with Edward Gierek in the past. Affiliation to the leadership was based mainly on the trust and loyalty towards the 1st Secretary of the Central Committee, while essential aspects of leadership were put aside. As a result, party leadership
was solid and internally stable, although conflicts and internal divisions happened, which was a common occurrence within power elites.
Uploads
Papers by Miroslaw Szumilo
The article deals with one of the fundamental issues in assessing Petliura as a politician and leader of a nation fighting for freedom, i.e. the rationality of his decisions and actions. To what extent they resulted from his revolutionary zealand patriotic romanticism, and to what extent they resulted from a cold and accurate assessment of reality, i.e. political realism. The text presents the clash between these two elements of Petliura’s political personality, referring to his own statements and the findings and opinions of historians.
Symon Petliura in his political activity undoubtedly underwent a characteristic ideological evolution – from socialist radicalism to national solidarity. The main stage of this evolution took place before the First World War. When two currents clashed within the Ukrainian Revolutionary Party: internationalist and national-liberation, he opted for the latter. After the outbreak of World War I he became pro-Russian, the result of cold political calculations.
As secretary for military affairs in the government of the Ukrainian People’s Republic, he sought to create a strong army and rejected utopian proposals for a compromise with the Bolsheviks. Remaining consistent in his orientation towards the Entente states, he opposed the alliance between Hetman Skoropadski and Germany. As a member of the UPR Directorate, he strove to reach an agreement with France, and when it turned out to be impossible, he focused on rapprochement with Poland. He knew perfectly well that only an alliance with Poland
would lead Ukraine out of the diplomatic vacuum created around it by Western countries. The Polish-Ukrainian alliance in 1920 did not lead to the maintenance of Ukraine’s independence, but it did uphold the Ukrainian cause. Symon Petliura undoubtedly played the greatest role in the Ukrainian struggle for independence in 1917–1920, and later became the leading statesman in Ukrainian political exile.
The purpose of this article is to analyze the successive stages of the transformation in Poland in order to answer the question: was it more of a planned reform of the system or a revolution? The key issue will be to assess the impact of individual factors—the communist authorities, the opposition elite, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, and grassroots pressure from society—on the course of transformation processes.
The share of Jews in the Polish Communist movement was several times higher than the share of the Jewish population in the society of the Second Polish Republic. Jews made up about 30 percent of all KPP members, and in the party youth group the figure reached as high as 50 percent. Activists of Jewish origin made up about 40 percent of the party elite, and they even came to predominate in the middle ranks.
The reasons for the significant participation of Jews in the Communist movement cannot be explained (which is often done) solely by their difficult social situation and discrimination. Rather, it was a combination of many factors of a different nature, both universal and specifically Jewish.
Republic of Poland (PRP) towards the “Prague Spring” and the intervention
of the Warsaw Pact in Czechoslovakia has already been discussed in
numerous publications. However, the reactions of Polish society are not so well known. Therefore, in this article I shall focus on the latter issue,
presenting briefly the position of the leadership of the Polish United
Workers’ Party (PUWP) and the propaganda campaign in the press.
przyjrzenie się sylwetkom konkretnych działaczy, są dokumenty
wytworzone przez sowieckich dyplomatów rezydujących w Polsce.
Dostęp do nich jest bardzo utrudniony, toteż wprowadzanie do
obiegu naukowego każdych, choćby wycinkowych, fragmentów tej
dokumentacji stanowi istotny wkład do naszego stanu wiedzy w
tej dziedzinie. W tym miejscu chciałbym udostępnić czytelnikom
garść dokumentów dyplomacji sowieckiej dotyczących przede
wszystkim podziałów wewnętrznych w elicie PZPR w okresie „małej
stabilizacji” (w latach 1959–1964). Poruszana w nich problematyka, choć była już przedmiotem badań naukowych, wciąż nie została jeszcze w pełni rozpoznana i opisana.
Party in the period of 1948–1970 – a sociological portrait:
The purpose of the article is to outline the collective sociological portrait of 92 people who performed the function of First Secretaries of Provincial Committees of the Polish United Worker’s Party in the period from December 1948 to December 1970. For this purpose, the following sociodemographic characteristics have been analysed: gender, age, social and ethnic origin, general and political education, as well as very significant generational differences.
By the end of the 1950s, the group in question was dominated by pre-war communists. “The Polish October” of 1956 in fact did not constitute a genuine staffing breakthrough. In the 1960s, this group was gradually joined by representatives of younger generations, who received better
education than their older comrades. Extensive replacement of the party elite, both quantitative, as well as qualitative, was brought about as late as by Edward Gierek taking over the power in December 1970.
analysis. The formal elites have been characterised in a general manner, focusing on a detailed definition of the actual elites of the PWP and PUWP, which to a large extent can be identified with the elites of the communist authorities of Poland. The article discusses
the leadership of the party (Political Bureau and Secretariat of the Central Committee), combining the entire elite, and four segments of the elites which were subjected to it: the elites of the Party apparatus, the elites of the state, the elites of national security apparatus and the elites of the Polish Army. In addition, the problem of functioning of the latent elites, the crypto-communists and “grey eminences”, was also addressed.
segments of state power (Julia Bristiger, Maria Wierna, Julia Minc), two in the central party
apparatus (Zofia Gomułkowa, Teodora Feder), and one is an example of an influential woman seated in the regional party apparatus of the provincial level (Sara Nomberg-Przytyk).
The analysis of these six cases leads to the conclusion that the informal strength of these women in the communist power elite was influenced by the following factors: gained experience, length of party membership, education and skills, and the position of a husband as a party activist or acquaintance among other members of the power elite.
the view that Edward Gierek assumed the function of the first secretary of the Central Committee of PZPR in December 1970 was primarily due to his earlier connections with Moscow. Our knowledge on this subject was based mainly, however, on guesses and accounts of witnesses of his meetings with the Soviets.
Records of conversations of Edward Gierek with Soviet diplomats have been preserved in the Russian State Archive of Social and Political History (RGASPI).
The quantitative and qualitative participation of communist Jews in the power apparatus of “People’s Poland” was exceptionally large, and in some segments (the central party apparatus, secret police, propaganda) even dominating. Jewish minority enjoyed autonomy and relative privileges in Poland. It was in fact a mapping of the situation from the Soviet Union of the twenties. The purpose of this article is to summarise the results of research on the involvement of Jews in the apparatus of communist authorities in Poland so far, based on scientific and source publications, and partly the author’s own research in this area.
The article reminds us of the myth of “Judeo-Communism” (żydokomuna) in the power apparatus of “People’s Poland”, where it came from and what was its influence on anti-Semitic attitudes in Polish society. Next, the number and influence of Jews in the structures of the communist authorities in the Stalinist period and in the times of Gomułka is characterised with particular emphasis on the security apparatus. It also looks into the reasons for such involvement of Jewish on the communist side and their promotion in the power apparatus, and the problem of their national identity. The article is an attempt to verify the myth, i.e. to determine how much it coincided with reality.
Summary
The article examines the personnel and the functioning mechanisms of the administration of the Polish United Workers Party (Political Bureau and Front Office of the Central Committee) in the seventies (from the 6th convention in December 1971 to Edward Gierek’s leaving the position of the 1st secretary of Central Committee on 8th September 1980). It outlines a group portrait of 30 members of administration, considering their primary social-demographic factors, generational affiliation and career paths.
Based on the analysis it can be assumed that the leadership of the Polish United Workers
Party between 1971 and 1980 was made out of activists from a similar social background (mainly working class and peasant backgrounds), but it was also diverse in terms of generations and education level. The leadership was made out of people doing careers in the party apparatus and at the same time associated with Edward Gierek in the past. Affiliation to the leadership was based mainly on the trust and loyalty towards the 1st Secretary of the Central Committee, while essential aspects of leadership were put aside. As a result, party leadership
was solid and internally stable, although conflicts and internal divisions happened, which was a common occurrence within power elites.
The article deals with one of the fundamental issues in assessing Petliura as a politician and leader of a nation fighting for freedom, i.e. the rationality of his decisions and actions. To what extent they resulted from his revolutionary zealand patriotic romanticism, and to what extent they resulted from a cold and accurate assessment of reality, i.e. political realism. The text presents the clash between these two elements of Petliura’s political personality, referring to his own statements and the findings and opinions of historians.
Symon Petliura in his political activity undoubtedly underwent a characteristic ideological evolution – from socialist radicalism to national solidarity. The main stage of this evolution took place before the First World War. When two currents clashed within the Ukrainian Revolutionary Party: internationalist and national-liberation, he opted for the latter. After the outbreak of World War I he became pro-Russian, the result of cold political calculations.
As secretary for military affairs in the government of the Ukrainian People’s Republic, he sought to create a strong army and rejected utopian proposals for a compromise with the Bolsheviks. Remaining consistent in his orientation towards the Entente states, he opposed the alliance between Hetman Skoropadski and Germany. As a member of the UPR Directorate, he strove to reach an agreement with France, and when it turned out to be impossible, he focused on rapprochement with Poland. He knew perfectly well that only an alliance with Poland
would lead Ukraine out of the diplomatic vacuum created around it by Western countries. The Polish-Ukrainian alliance in 1920 did not lead to the maintenance of Ukraine’s independence, but it did uphold the Ukrainian cause. Symon Petliura undoubtedly played the greatest role in the Ukrainian struggle for independence in 1917–1920, and later became the leading statesman in Ukrainian political exile.
The purpose of this article is to analyze the successive stages of the transformation in Poland in order to answer the question: was it more of a planned reform of the system or a revolution? The key issue will be to assess the impact of individual factors—the communist authorities, the opposition elite, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, and grassroots pressure from society—on the course of transformation processes.
The share of Jews in the Polish Communist movement was several times higher than the share of the Jewish population in the society of the Second Polish Republic. Jews made up about 30 percent of all KPP members, and in the party youth group the figure reached as high as 50 percent. Activists of Jewish origin made up about 40 percent of the party elite, and they even came to predominate in the middle ranks.
The reasons for the significant participation of Jews in the Communist movement cannot be explained (which is often done) solely by their difficult social situation and discrimination. Rather, it was a combination of many factors of a different nature, both universal and specifically Jewish.
Republic of Poland (PRP) towards the “Prague Spring” and the intervention
of the Warsaw Pact in Czechoslovakia has already been discussed in
numerous publications. However, the reactions of Polish society are not so well known. Therefore, in this article I shall focus on the latter issue,
presenting briefly the position of the leadership of the Polish United
Workers’ Party (PUWP) and the propaganda campaign in the press.
przyjrzenie się sylwetkom konkretnych działaczy, są dokumenty
wytworzone przez sowieckich dyplomatów rezydujących w Polsce.
Dostęp do nich jest bardzo utrudniony, toteż wprowadzanie do
obiegu naukowego każdych, choćby wycinkowych, fragmentów tej
dokumentacji stanowi istotny wkład do naszego stanu wiedzy w
tej dziedzinie. W tym miejscu chciałbym udostępnić czytelnikom
garść dokumentów dyplomacji sowieckiej dotyczących przede
wszystkim podziałów wewnętrznych w elicie PZPR w okresie „małej
stabilizacji” (w latach 1959–1964). Poruszana w nich problematyka, choć była już przedmiotem badań naukowych, wciąż nie została jeszcze w pełni rozpoznana i opisana.
Party in the period of 1948–1970 – a sociological portrait:
The purpose of the article is to outline the collective sociological portrait of 92 people who performed the function of First Secretaries of Provincial Committees of the Polish United Worker’s Party in the period from December 1948 to December 1970. For this purpose, the following sociodemographic characteristics have been analysed: gender, age, social and ethnic origin, general and political education, as well as very significant generational differences.
By the end of the 1950s, the group in question was dominated by pre-war communists. “The Polish October” of 1956 in fact did not constitute a genuine staffing breakthrough. In the 1960s, this group was gradually joined by representatives of younger generations, who received better
education than their older comrades. Extensive replacement of the party elite, both quantitative, as well as qualitative, was brought about as late as by Edward Gierek taking over the power in December 1970.
analysis. The formal elites have been characterised in a general manner, focusing on a detailed definition of the actual elites of the PWP and PUWP, which to a large extent can be identified with the elites of the communist authorities of Poland. The article discusses
the leadership of the party (Political Bureau and Secretariat of the Central Committee), combining the entire elite, and four segments of the elites which were subjected to it: the elites of the Party apparatus, the elites of the state, the elites of national security apparatus and the elites of the Polish Army. In addition, the problem of functioning of the latent elites, the crypto-communists and “grey eminences”, was also addressed.
segments of state power (Julia Bristiger, Maria Wierna, Julia Minc), two in the central party
apparatus (Zofia Gomułkowa, Teodora Feder), and one is an example of an influential woman seated in the regional party apparatus of the provincial level (Sara Nomberg-Przytyk).
The analysis of these six cases leads to the conclusion that the informal strength of these women in the communist power elite was influenced by the following factors: gained experience, length of party membership, education and skills, and the position of a husband as a party activist or acquaintance among other members of the power elite.
the view that Edward Gierek assumed the function of the first secretary of the Central Committee of PZPR in December 1970 was primarily due to his earlier connections with Moscow. Our knowledge on this subject was based mainly, however, on guesses and accounts of witnesses of his meetings with the Soviets.
Records of conversations of Edward Gierek with Soviet diplomats have been preserved in the Russian State Archive of Social and Political History (RGASPI).
The quantitative and qualitative participation of communist Jews in the power apparatus of “People’s Poland” was exceptionally large, and in some segments (the central party apparatus, secret police, propaganda) even dominating. Jewish minority enjoyed autonomy and relative privileges in Poland. It was in fact a mapping of the situation from the Soviet Union of the twenties. The purpose of this article is to summarise the results of research on the involvement of Jews in the apparatus of communist authorities in Poland so far, based on scientific and source publications, and partly the author’s own research in this area.
The article reminds us of the myth of “Judeo-Communism” (żydokomuna) in the power apparatus of “People’s Poland”, where it came from and what was its influence on anti-Semitic attitudes in Polish society. Next, the number and influence of Jews in the structures of the communist authorities in the Stalinist period and in the times of Gomułka is characterised with particular emphasis on the security apparatus. It also looks into the reasons for such involvement of Jewish on the communist side and their promotion in the power apparatus, and the problem of their national identity. The article is an attempt to verify the myth, i.e. to determine how much it coincided with reality.
Summary
The article examines the personnel and the functioning mechanisms of the administration of the Polish United Workers Party (Political Bureau and Front Office of the Central Committee) in the seventies (from the 6th convention in December 1971 to Edward Gierek’s leaving the position of the 1st secretary of Central Committee on 8th September 1980). It outlines a group portrait of 30 members of administration, considering their primary social-demographic factors, generational affiliation and career paths.
Based on the analysis it can be assumed that the leadership of the Polish United Workers
Party between 1971 and 1980 was made out of activists from a similar social background (mainly working class and peasant backgrounds), but it was also diverse in terms of generations and education level. The leadership was made out of people doing careers in the party apparatus and at the same time associated with Edward Gierek in the past. Affiliation to the leadership was based mainly on the trust and loyalty towards the 1st Secretary of the Central Committee, while essential aspects of leadership were put aside. As a result, party leadership
was solid and internally stable, although conflicts and internal divisions happened, which was a common occurrence within power elites.
Organisers: Nation´s Memory Institute (Slovakia); Institute of National Remembrance (Poland); Committee of National Remembrance (Hungary); Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes (Czech Republic)
Co-organiser: European Network Remembrance and Solidarity
The aim of the international scientific conference The Communist Parties in the Soviet Bloc 1956 – 1968. Belle Époque of the Eastern Bloc? is to analyse the activities and development of individual communist parties in the former Soviet bloc since the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in Augusta 1968 until the founding of the Independent Trade Union Movement Solidarity in Poland in 1980.
The outcome of the conference will be a reviewed collective monograph. The title and abstract of your paper (max. 2,400 characters), as well as a brief professional curriculum vitae, including the current workplace, should be sent before 30 June 2022 to the e-mail address:
[email protected]
Plonem spotkania i dyskusji w Palczewie są publikowane w niniejszym tomie artykuły, ułożone w porządku chronologicznym, a obejmujące szerokie spektrum zagadnień z historii najnowszej Polski – począwszy do okresu międzywojennego po lata osiemdziesiąte.