Lydia Dobson
Related Authors
Toby Rollo
Lakehead University
Beth Stovell
Ambrose University
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Noe Cornago
University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Luciana Zorzoli
University of Essex
Dimitris Stamatopoulos
University of Macedonia
Stephen Whittle
Manchester Metropolitan University
Leonidas Cheliotis
London School of Economics and Political Science
John Asimakopoulos
City University of New York
InterestsView All (25)
Uploads
Papers by Lydia Dobson
leaders at Carleton University are drawn upon, along with the public testimonials of union members, during the 2013-14 round of collective bargaining between Carleton University and the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 4600. We contend that the trend towards rising precariousness must be seen as the
further “proletarianization” of an increasingly insecure segment of the labour force in Ontario, which includes workers employed in Ontario’s university sector. First, precarious employment in Ontario is examined broadly. Second, we explore precarious work in the university sector more specifically. Third, a case study
analysis examining the most recent contract negotiations between CUPE 4600 and Carleton University in Ottawa is examined. This includes: (1) the challenges of mobilization within the union bureaucracy; (2) challenges between the local and National office; and; (3) the role of solidarity in combating precariousness. To conclude, the conditions in which unionized precarious workers can achieve improvements in their workplaces are discussed. It is hoped that other postsecondary union activists can gain from this experience, and in doing so, expand the fight against the negative effects of precarious employment in Ontario and elsewhere.
leaders at Carleton University are drawn upon, along with the public testimonials of union members, during the 2013-14 round of collective bargaining between Carleton University and the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 4600. We contend that the trend towards rising precariousness must be seen as the
further “proletarianization” of an increasingly insecure segment of the labour force in Ontario, which includes workers employed in Ontario’s university sector. First, precarious employment in Ontario is examined broadly. Second, we explore precarious work in the university sector more specifically. Third, a case study
analysis examining the most recent contract negotiations between CUPE 4600 and Carleton University in Ottawa is examined. This includes: (1) the challenges of mobilization within the union bureaucracy; (2) challenges between the local and National office; and; (3) the role of solidarity in combating precariousness. To conclude, the conditions in which unionized precarious workers can achieve improvements in their workplaces are discussed. It is hoped that other postsecondary union activists can gain from this experience, and in doing so, expand the fight against the negative effects of precarious employment in Ontario and elsewhere.