Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
This paper introduces a paired text history methodology to explore the citation practices of thre... more This paper introduces a paired text history methodology to explore the citation practices of three experienced Russian scholars in philosophy, sociology, and economics. The empirical focus is on the analysis of three paired text histories, comparing Russian-medium research articles with English-medium research articles in each discipline. By analyzing the paired text histories through the use of multiple data sources – article drafts, email correspondence surrounding text production, and interviews – focusing specifically on the changes made to citations in each pair, the paper seeks to throw light on both micro and macro level knowledge production practices. At the micro level, the paper analyses changes made to citations across English and Russian-medium texts, documenting the involvement of literacy brokers, their evaluative requests about citations, and authors’ responses to such requests. At the macro level, the paper raises questions about what counts as ‘citeworthy’ in differ...
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
The use of ‘text history’ and ‘text trajectory’ constitutes an epistemological break from histori... more The use of ‘text history’ and ‘text trajectory’ constitutes an epistemological break from historically static approaches to the study of academic writing for publication. However, there is a need to further develop dynamic approaches to professional academic text production in ways which are robustly grounded in scholars’ lived practices. The paper briefly reviews the use of ‘text history’ and ‘text trajectory’, signalling their value and some limitations, and offers a heuristic foregrounding the importance of chronotope (Bakhtin, 1981 [1935]; Blommaert, 2018), ‘text cluster’, and multi/translingual practice. Drawing on a range of data relating to 12 multilingual scholars in four national sites from the longitudinal study Professional Academic Writing in a Global Context – interviews, observations, curriculum vitae – the paper foregrounds three key chronotopic dimensions in the dynamics of textual academic knowledge making: micro time, specific moments of text production; meso time ...
We are living in an era characterized by multilingualism, global mobility, superdiversity (Blomma... more We are living in an era characterized by multilingualism, global mobility, superdiversity (Blommaert, 2010), and digital communications. Mobility and multilingualism, however, have long characterized most geolinguistic contexts, including those where monolingual ideologies have influenced the formation of contemporary nation states (Cenoz, 2013). As language is a pillar of both curriculum and instruction, in many academic spaces around the world efforts are on the rise to acknowledge the colonial origins of English, decenter the dominance of Standard English(es), and decolonize knowledge production (e.g., Bhambra et al., 2018; de Sousa Santos, 2017). Additionally, many ‘inner circle’ (Kachru, 2001) Anglophone contexts have long witnessed the centrifugal forces of multilingualism. Yet what prevails in institutional academic contexts is a centripetal pull toward what has been captured in phrases such as ‘linguistic mononormativity’ (Blommaert & Horner, 2017) or ‘Anglonormativity’ (McK...
Revista Argentina de Investigación Educativa, 2023
Buscamos discutir algunos presupuestos sobre el uso del inglés como “lengua franca” en contextos ... more Buscamos discutir algunos presupuestos sobre el uso del inglés como “lengua franca” en contextos científico-académicos, identificar el impacto de estos presupuestos en las trayectorias de producción y recepción de conocimientos, y legitimar el uso de múltiples lenguas para el intercambio académico transnacional. Proponemos diez principios: el uso del inglés como “lengua franca” científico-académica no siempre promueve la inclusión; una supuesta “lengua franca” científico-académica puede actuar como lengua de dominación; las políticas que posicionan al inglés como “lengua franca” pueden desalentar las traducciones y limitar la participación; las políticas que colocan al inglés como la “lengua franca” científico-académica contemporánea pueden sugerir que el conocimiento producido en inglés es el único que existe; la imposición del inglés como presunta “lengua franca” científico-académica es una expresión de la distribución desigual de la producción y recepción de conocimiento; las lenguas y variedades actúan como poderosos recursos para la producción de conocimiento; la elección de una lengua de publicación o presentación es un derecho sociolingüístico; la elección de una lengua de publicación o presentación es un acto político; los organizadores de congresos deberían tener derecho a fomentar la(s) lengua(s) de su preferencia; los organizadores y participantes de congresos deberían ser creativos y estar atentos a la inclusión de audiencias lo más diversas posible.
I was pleased to receive a copy of Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams' review in The Writing Center Journal ... more I was pleased to receive a copy of Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams' review in The Writing Center Journal of my book on the experience of "non-traditional" students and their writing in UK higher education. As researchers and teachers, most of us are interested in sharing ideas across geographical, institutional and cultural contexts: indeed the Spring/Summer issue of The Writing Center Journal with articles from diverse cultural contexts is testament to this commitment. However, Lisa's review also reminded me that however much we live in a
The production of written texts is a high-stakes activity in professional social work, playing a ... more The production of written texts is a high-stakes activity in professional social work, playing a central role in all decisions about services and simultaneously used to evaluate social workers’ professional competence. Social work writing (often referred to as ‘recording’ or ‘paperwork’) is frequently the target of criticism in reviews and public media reporting. Despite the many criticisms made and its significance in social work practice, little empirical research has been carried out on the nature of writing in professional practice. This paper will draw on findings from a 2-year, ESRC-funded ethnographically framed study ‘Writing in professional social work practice in a changing communicative landscape’ (WiSP http://www.writinginsocialwork.com) to characterise writing in contemporary social work. Drawing on a range of data including texts (3900) which constitute a 1 million word corpus, individual interviews (58) and observations of social work practice (10 weeks), we will offe...
Contemporary professional social work can be characterised by increased textualisation (after Ied... more Contemporary professional social work can be characterised by increased textualisation (after Iedema and Scheeres 2003) with written texts mediating most action. At the same time, writing, as a key dimension to social workers’ practice and labour, is often institutionally unacknowledged, becoming visible primarily when identified as a “problem.” This paper draws on a three year nationally funded UK-based research project to offer a situated account of contemporary professional social work writing, challenging dominant institutional orientations to writing in professional practice. The paper outlines the specific ways in which social work practices, including writing, can be characterised as being ‘in flux’. Drawing on ethnographic data and adopting a Bakhtinian (1981, 1986) oriented approach to voice, the paper explores the entextualisation of three specific social work texts, focusing in particular on critical moments (after Candlin 1987, 1997). These critical moments offer insigh...
Creating a corpus of social workers’ writing: Methodological challenges, representational issues ... more Creating a corpus of social workers’ writing: Methodological challenges, representational issues and analytical concerns Conference or Workshop Item How to cite: Leedham, Maria; Lillis, Theresa and Twiner, Alison (2018). Creating a corpus of social workers’ writing: Methodological challenges, representational issues and analytical concerns. In: 4th Corpora and Discourse International Conference, 22-24 Jun 2018, Lancaster University.
The first comprehensive dictionary of the field of sociolinguistics, this is a valuable reference... more The first comprehensive dictionary of the field of sociolinguistics, this is a valuable reference book for students and teachers of sociolinguistics, others concerned with the socially-oriented study of language and those with a professional interest in language. Entries are concise, the style is reader-friendly and numerous cross-references enable readers to follow up links to related terms and concepts. Sociolinguistics is characterised by increasing heterogeneity, and students are faced with a proliferation of theories, concepts and terminology. This is sometimes a minefield, with similar terms used rather differently within different academic traditions. The dictionary provides a broad coverage of sociolinguistics, including macro- and micro-sociolinguistics and a range of approaches within variationist, interactional, critical and applied traditions. In explaining sociolinguistic terminology, the dictionary is able to map out the traditions and approaches that comprise sociolinguistics and will thus help readers find their way around this fascinating but complex subject. The authors have taught and researched widely across different areas of sociolinguistics.They also draw on their experience of working in different geographical areas, including the USA, UK and Europe, Australia, southern Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Features: *Covers topics relevant to a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, psychology, sociology and education as well as linguistics *Organised alphabetically with terms explained in a non-technical way *Includes an extensive bibliography.
The range and amount of writing taking place across all domains of life in the 21st century is ex... more The range and amount of writing taking place across all domains of life in the 21st century is expanding rapidly. At home, in school, at work and in the community, children, young people and adults write for numerous purposes and in multiple modes. Professional writers too capitalise on the multimodal diversity available and employ a range of materials and technologies. What it means to be a ‘writer’ in different domains and the myriad of influences upon individual writers’ texts composed in different contexts is part of the focus of this book. Predominantly it explores the identities of teachers, trainee teachers and students as writers, both within and beyond school. However this chapter focuses on the identities of professional writers. It draws upon a cross-university study which investigated the nature of twelve UK-based professional writers’ identities and histories as writers and their composing practices. There is a great deal of literature which retrospectively examines pro...
The Politics of Language and Creativity in a Globalised World, edited by David Hann and Theresa L... more The Politics of Language and Creativity in a Globalised World, edited by David Hann and Theresa Lillis, explores the many ways in which linguistic creativity is a resource for political activity. It examines the politics surrounding the production, ownership and evaluation of different kinds of creative activity in contemporary society. The book focuses on the explosion of creative ‘production’ across texts, modes, media and technologies in contemporary society and examines how this historic shift from reception to production is raising questions about what gets valued as ‘creative’ and why.
This chapter focuses on exploring creativity in political discourse in three ways: 1 At the level... more This chapter focuses on exploring creativity in political discourse in three ways: 1 At the level of creation or production. To consider the array of semiotic and linguistic resources that are used to create or produce political discourse, paying particular attention to those features which have an aesthetic dimension or appeal; that is, they are intended as, or are taken up as, beautiful, pleasing, fun(ny),interesting, unusual, surprising, shocking. 2 At the level of purpose. To consider why particular kinds of creativity are used in political discourse or for political purposes. Of course, it is not possible to know producers’ purposes by looking at their products alone, but they all involve an aspect of persuasion, wanting to convince the audience of particular views and perspectives. However, they do so in different ways, through style, humour, language and image. They may also have a moral or ethical purpose and, indeed, some theorists emphasise the moral purpose of all aesthet...
Bruce Horner is a professor of rhetoric and composition at the University of Louisville. His work... more Bruce Horner is a professor of rhetoric and composition at the University of Louisville. His work takes place within the context of US Composition. In this extract from a longer and ongoing conversation about connections between “Academic Literacies” and “Composition” and, in particular what is meant by transformation, Bruce explores what he sees as a key challenge— how to define and engage with the notion of “difference” in academic writing.
The Perspectives on Writing series addresses writing studies in a broad sense. Consistent with th... more The Perspectives on Writing series addresses writing studies in a broad sense. Consistent with the wide ranging approaches characteristic of teaching and scholarship in writing across the curriculum, the series presents works that take divergent perspectives on working as a writer, teaching writing, administering writing programs, and studying writing in its various forms. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES ON THE STUDY OF WRITING Series Editors, Terry Myers Zawacki, Magnus Gustafsson, and Joan Mullin The International Exchanges on the Study of Writing Series publishes book-length manuscripts that address worldwide perspectives on writing, writers, teaching with writing, and scholarly writing practices, specifically those that draw on scholarship across national and disciplinary borders to challenge parochial understandings of all of the above. The series aims to examine writing activities in 21st-century contexts, particularly how they are informed by globalization, national identity, social networking, and increased cross-cultural communication and awareness. As such, the series strives to investigate how both the local and the international inform writing research and the facilitation of writing development.
Corpus linguistics is increasingly employed to explore large, publicly-available datasets such as... more Corpus linguistics is increasingly employed to explore large, publicly-available datasets such as newspaper texts, government speeches and online fora. However, comparatively few corpora exist where the subject matter concerns sensitive topics about living individuals since, due to their highly personal and confidential nature, these texts are hard to access and raise difficult ethical questions around secondary data analysis. One exception is the Writing in professional social work practice (WiSP) corpus, comprising texts written by UK-based professional social workers in the course of their daily work and now available to other researchers through the ReShare archive. This paper focuses on the challenges involved in building the WiSP corpus and the epistemological and ethical issues raised. Two key aspects of research practice are discussed: data anonymisation and dataset archiving. Specifically, the paper explores decision-making around anonymisation and an ethically-informed rationale for treating some texts as 'not for sharing', leading to the decision to create two corpora: one for the research team and a further anonymised and slightly reduced version for archiving. The paper explores what the WiSP corpora (Corpus 1 and Corpus 2) contribute to understandings about social work writing, the extent to which the two corpora enable different analyses and whether the existence of two corpora is problematic from a corpus linguistic perspective. The paper concludes by considering how the ethical decisions around corpus creation of sensitive texts raise questions about key principles in corpus linguistics.
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
This paper introduces a paired text history methodology to explore the citation practices of thre... more This paper introduces a paired text history methodology to explore the citation practices of three experienced Russian scholars in philosophy, sociology, and economics. The empirical focus is on the analysis of three paired text histories, comparing Russian-medium research articles with English-medium research articles in each discipline. By analyzing the paired text histories through the use of multiple data sources – article drafts, email correspondence surrounding text production, and interviews – focusing specifically on the changes made to citations in each pair, the paper seeks to throw light on both micro and macro level knowledge production practices. At the micro level, the paper analyses changes made to citations across English and Russian-medium texts, documenting the involvement of literacy brokers, their evaluative requests about citations, and authors’ responses to such requests. At the macro level, the paper raises questions about what counts as ‘citeworthy’ in differ...
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
The use of ‘text history’ and ‘text trajectory’ constitutes an epistemological break from histori... more The use of ‘text history’ and ‘text trajectory’ constitutes an epistemological break from historically static approaches to the study of academic writing for publication. However, there is a need to further develop dynamic approaches to professional academic text production in ways which are robustly grounded in scholars’ lived practices. The paper briefly reviews the use of ‘text history’ and ‘text trajectory’, signalling their value and some limitations, and offers a heuristic foregrounding the importance of chronotope (Bakhtin, 1981 [1935]; Blommaert, 2018), ‘text cluster’, and multi/translingual practice. Drawing on a range of data relating to 12 multilingual scholars in four national sites from the longitudinal study Professional Academic Writing in a Global Context – interviews, observations, curriculum vitae – the paper foregrounds three key chronotopic dimensions in the dynamics of textual academic knowledge making: micro time, specific moments of text production; meso time ...
We are living in an era characterized by multilingualism, global mobility, superdiversity (Blomma... more We are living in an era characterized by multilingualism, global mobility, superdiversity (Blommaert, 2010), and digital communications. Mobility and multilingualism, however, have long characterized most geolinguistic contexts, including those where monolingual ideologies have influenced the formation of contemporary nation states (Cenoz, 2013). As language is a pillar of both curriculum and instruction, in many academic spaces around the world efforts are on the rise to acknowledge the colonial origins of English, decenter the dominance of Standard English(es), and decolonize knowledge production (e.g., Bhambra et al., 2018; de Sousa Santos, 2017). Additionally, many ‘inner circle’ (Kachru, 2001) Anglophone contexts have long witnessed the centrifugal forces of multilingualism. Yet what prevails in institutional academic contexts is a centripetal pull toward what has been captured in phrases such as ‘linguistic mononormativity’ (Blommaert & Horner, 2017) or ‘Anglonormativity’ (McK...
Revista Argentina de Investigación Educativa, 2023
Buscamos discutir algunos presupuestos sobre el uso del inglés como “lengua franca” en contextos ... more Buscamos discutir algunos presupuestos sobre el uso del inglés como “lengua franca” en contextos científico-académicos, identificar el impacto de estos presupuestos en las trayectorias de producción y recepción de conocimientos, y legitimar el uso de múltiples lenguas para el intercambio académico transnacional. Proponemos diez principios: el uso del inglés como “lengua franca” científico-académica no siempre promueve la inclusión; una supuesta “lengua franca” científico-académica puede actuar como lengua de dominación; las políticas que posicionan al inglés como “lengua franca” pueden desalentar las traducciones y limitar la participación; las políticas que colocan al inglés como la “lengua franca” científico-académica contemporánea pueden sugerir que el conocimiento producido en inglés es el único que existe; la imposición del inglés como presunta “lengua franca” científico-académica es una expresión de la distribución desigual de la producción y recepción de conocimiento; las lenguas y variedades actúan como poderosos recursos para la producción de conocimiento; la elección de una lengua de publicación o presentación es un derecho sociolingüístico; la elección de una lengua de publicación o presentación es un acto político; los organizadores de congresos deberían tener derecho a fomentar la(s) lengua(s) de su preferencia; los organizadores y participantes de congresos deberían ser creativos y estar atentos a la inclusión de audiencias lo más diversas posible.
I was pleased to receive a copy of Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams' review in The Writing Center Journal ... more I was pleased to receive a copy of Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams' review in The Writing Center Journal of my book on the experience of "non-traditional" students and their writing in UK higher education. As researchers and teachers, most of us are interested in sharing ideas across geographical, institutional and cultural contexts: indeed the Spring/Summer issue of The Writing Center Journal with articles from diverse cultural contexts is testament to this commitment. However, Lisa's review also reminded me that however much we live in a
The production of written texts is a high-stakes activity in professional social work, playing a ... more The production of written texts is a high-stakes activity in professional social work, playing a central role in all decisions about services and simultaneously used to evaluate social workers’ professional competence. Social work writing (often referred to as ‘recording’ or ‘paperwork’) is frequently the target of criticism in reviews and public media reporting. Despite the many criticisms made and its significance in social work practice, little empirical research has been carried out on the nature of writing in professional practice. This paper will draw on findings from a 2-year, ESRC-funded ethnographically framed study ‘Writing in professional social work practice in a changing communicative landscape’ (WiSP http://www.writinginsocialwork.com) to characterise writing in contemporary social work. Drawing on a range of data including texts (3900) which constitute a 1 million word corpus, individual interviews (58) and observations of social work practice (10 weeks), we will offe...
Contemporary professional social work can be characterised by increased textualisation (after Ied... more Contemporary professional social work can be characterised by increased textualisation (after Iedema and Scheeres 2003) with written texts mediating most action. At the same time, writing, as a key dimension to social workers’ practice and labour, is often institutionally unacknowledged, becoming visible primarily when identified as a “problem.” This paper draws on a three year nationally funded UK-based research project to offer a situated account of contemporary professional social work writing, challenging dominant institutional orientations to writing in professional practice. The paper outlines the specific ways in which social work practices, including writing, can be characterised as being ‘in flux’. Drawing on ethnographic data and adopting a Bakhtinian (1981, 1986) oriented approach to voice, the paper explores the entextualisation of three specific social work texts, focusing in particular on critical moments (after Candlin 1987, 1997). These critical moments offer insigh...
Creating a corpus of social workers’ writing: Methodological challenges, representational issues ... more Creating a corpus of social workers’ writing: Methodological challenges, representational issues and analytical concerns Conference or Workshop Item How to cite: Leedham, Maria; Lillis, Theresa and Twiner, Alison (2018). Creating a corpus of social workers’ writing: Methodological challenges, representational issues and analytical concerns. In: 4th Corpora and Discourse International Conference, 22-24 Jun 2018, Lancaster University.
The first comprehensive dictionary of the field of sociolinguistics, this is a valuable reference... more The first comprehensive dictionary of the field of sociolinguistics, this is a valuable reference book for students and teachers of sociolinguistics, others concerned with the socially-oriented study of language and those with a professional interest in language. Entries are concise, the style is reader-friendly and numerous cross-references enable readers to follow up links to related terms and concepts. Sociolinguistics is characterised by increasing heterogeneity, and students are faced with a proliferation of theories, concepts and terminology. This is sometimes a minefield, with similar terms used rather differently within different academic traditions. The dictionary provides a broad coverage of sociolinguistics, including macro- and micro-sociolinguistics and a range of approaches within variationist, interactional, critical and applied traditions. In explaining sociolinguistic terminology, the dictionary is able to map out the traditions and approaches that comprise sociolinguistics and will thus help readers find their way around this fascinating but complex subject. The authors have taught and researched widely across different areas of sociolinguistics.They also draw on their experience of working in different geographical areas, including the USA, UK and Europe, Australia, southern Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Features: *Covers topics relevant to a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, psychology, sociology and education as well as linguistics *Organised alphabetically with terms explained in a non-technical way *Includes an extensive bibliography.
The range and amount of writing taking place across all domains of life in the 21st century is ex... more The range and amount of writing taking place across all domains of life in the 21st century is expanding rapidly. At home, in school, at work and in the community, children, young people and adults write for numerous purposes and in multiple modes. Professional writers too capitalise on the multimodal diversity available and employ a range of materials and technologies. What it means to be a ‘writer’ in different domains and the myriad of influences upon individual writers’ texts composed in different contexts is part of the focus of this book. Predominantly it explores the identities of teachers, trainee teachers and students as writers, both within and beyond school. However this chapter focuses on the identities of professional writers. It draws upon a cross-university study which investigated the nature of twelve UK-based professional writers’ identities and histories as writers and their composing practices. There is a great deal of literature which retrospectively examines pro...
The Politics of Language and Creativity in a Globalised World, edited by David Hann and Theresa L... more The Politics of Language and Creativity in a Globalised World, edited by David Hann and Theresa Lillis, explores the many ways in which linguistic creativity is a resource for political activity. It examines the politics surrounding the production, ownership and evaluation of different kinds of creative activity in contemporary society. The book focuses on the explosion of creative ‘production’ across texts, modes, media and technologies in contemporary society and examines how this historic shift from reception to production is raising questions about what gets valued as ‘creative’ and why.
This chapter focuses on exploring creativity in political discourse in three ways: 1 At the level... more This chapter focuses on exploring creativity in political discourse in three ways: 1 At the level of creation or production. To consider the array of semiotic and linguistic resources that are used to create or produce political discourse, paying particular attention to those features which have an aesthetic dimension or appeal; that is, they are intended as, or are taken up as, beautiful, pleasing, fun(ny),interesting, unusual, surprising, shocking. 2 At the level of purpose. To consider why particular kinds of creativity are used in political discourse or for political purposes. Of course, it is not possible to know producers’ purposes by looking at their products alone, but they all involve an aspect of persuasion, wanting to convince the audience of particular views and perspectives. However, they do so in different ways, through style, humour, language and image. They may also have a moral or ethical purpose and, indeed, some theorists emphasise the moral purpose of all aesthet...
Bruce Horner is a professor of rhetoric and composition at the University of Louisville. His work... more Bruce Horner is a professor of rhetoric and composition at the University of Louisville. His work takes place within the context of US Composition. In this extract from a longer and ongoing conversation about connections between “Academic Literacies” and “Composition” and, in particular what is meant by transformation, Bruce explores what he sees as a key challenge— how to define and engage with the notion of “difference” in academic writing.
The Perspectives on Writing series addresses writing studies in a broad sense. Consistent with th... more The Perspectives on Writing series addresses writing studies in a broad sense. Consistent with the wide ranging approaches characteristic of teaching and scholarship in writing across the curriculum, the series presents works that take divergent perspectives on working as a writer, teaching writing, administering writing programs, and studying writing in its various forms. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES ON THE STUDY OF WRITING Series Editors, Terry Myers Zawacki, Magnus Gustafsson, and Joan Mullin The International Exchanges on the Study of Writing Series publishes book-length manuscripts that address worldwide perspectives on writing, writers, teaching with writing, and scholarly writing practices, specifically those that draw on scholarship across national and disciplinary borders to challenge parochial understandings of all of the above. The series aims to examine writing activities in 21st-century contexts, particularly how they are informed by globalization, national identity, social networking, and increased cross-cultural communication and awareness. As such, the series strives to investigate how both the local and the international inform writing research and the facilitation of writing development.
Corpus linguistics is increasingly employed to explore large, publicly-available datasets such as... more Corpus linguistics is increasingly employed to explore large, publicly-available datasets such as newspaper texts, government speeches and online fora. However, comparatively few corpora exist where the subject matter concerns sensitive topics about living individuals since, due to their highly personal and confidential nature, these texts are hard to access and raise difficult ethical questions around secondary data analysis. One exception is the Writing in professional social work practice (WiSP) corpus, comprising texts written by UK-based professional social workers in the course of their daily work and now available to other researchers through the ReShare archive. This paper focuses on the challenges involved in building the WiSP corpus and the epistemological and ethical issues raised. Two key aspects of research practice are discussed: data anonymisation and dataset archiving. Specifically, the paper explores decision-making around anonymisation and an ethically-informed rationale for treating some texts as 'not for sharing', leading to the decision to create two corpora: one for the research team and a further anonymised and slightly reduced version for archiving. The paper explores what the WiSP corpora (Corpus 1 and Corpus 2) contribute to understandings about social work writing, the extent to which the two corpora enable different analyses and whether the existence of two corpora is problematic from a corpus linguistic perspective. The paper concludes by considering how the ethical decisions around corpus creation of sensitive texts raise questions about key principles in corpus linguistics.
Uploads
Papers by Theresa Lillis