I am reading a paper written by Masao Kiyota and Tetsuro Okuyama on "A Note on a Conjecture of K. Harada" and my question is regarding a statement in this paper. A link to the paper is provided at the end of the question.
Notation: Let $G$ be a finite group and $p$ be a prime number. Let $\{\chi_1,...,\chi_s\}$ be the set of all irreducible complex characters of $G.$ For a subset $J$ of the index set $\{1,...,s\}$, we put $\{\chi_J\}=\{\chi_j:j\in J\}$ and $\rho_J=\sum_{j\in J} \chi_j(1) \chi.$
Harada's Conjecture: If $\rho_J(x)=0$ for any $p-$ singular element $x$ of $G,$ then $\{\chi_J\}$ is a union of $p-$ blocks of $G.$
Harada's Conjecture(A): If $\rho_J(x)=0$ for any $p-$ singular element $x$ of $G$ and $\{\chi_J\}\subset B$ for a $p-$ block $B$ of $G,$ then $\{\chi_J\}=\emptyset$ or $B.$
My Question: The paper I mentioned earlier implies that Harada's conjecture is equivalent to Harada's conjecture(A). This, apparently, has been proved by Harada himself but I am unable to find his proof. Could someone please explain to me how Harada's original version can be reduced to version(A)?
My background: I have read up to chapter 7 of Martin Isaacs' Character Theory book. Coming summer, I am planning on reading Gabriel Navarro's Characters and Blocks of Finite Groups with a professor, so I want to read some fun papers and get some idea about the subject. I binge read first couple of chapters of Navarro's book.
Thank you!!
Paper: https://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.pja/1195516542