Philippe Buc
Lycée École Active Bilingue (Paris); BA Swarthmore College; Maîtrise Paris I Sorbonne; MA U.C. Berkeley (Political Science, Medieval Europe, Medieval Japan); PhD École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (Paris).
Supervisors: Jacques Le Goff, Gerard Caspary, and Jean-Claude Schmitt
Supervisors: Jacques Le Goff, Gerard Caspary, and Jean-Claude Schmitt
less
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Philippe Buc
This article has been published by Medieval Worlds at https://doi.org/10.1553/medievalworlds_no19_2023s3.
religion influenced warfare, not in terms of causality but in terms
of conditions of possibility. After having looked at (1) the way in
which the crusades, in particular, opened up the possibility to
transfer attributes from monastic asceticism (the monks were
spiritual ‘warriors of God’) to warriors (fighting as ‘warriors of
God’), the article examines two examples. (2) Theology provided
to the Western European culture of war the figure of the ‘false
brother’, which, translated, yielded a script for the internal enemy,
the political traitor and adversary in civil wars. Around this figure
enormous fantasies crystallized themselves, arguably without
equivalent in non-monotheistic cultures. One sees in the late
medieval French civil wars the semi-secularized mobilization of
this figure, with fantasies and execution of violent purge. (3) The
ascetic values activated for warfare with the First Crusade meant
that while in reality (as one would expect) sexual did
transgressions occur, rape in war by one’s own side was hardly
ever admitted, and arguably was in reality also inhibited.
A shorter French version constitutes the postface to the French translation of Holy War, Martyrdom, and Terror, published as Guerre Sainte by Gallimard (Paris, 2017)
Coming out in the "Magazin" this fall
This article has been published by Medieval Worlds at https://doi.org/10.1553/medievalworlds_no19_2023s3.
religion influenced warfare, not in terms of causality but in terms
of conditions of possibility. After having looked at (1) the way in
which the crusades, in particular, opened up the possibility to
transfer attributes from monastic asceticism (the monks were
spiritual ‘warriors of God’) to warriors (fighting as ‘warriors of
God’), the article examines two examples. (2) Theology provided
to the Western European culture of war the figure of the ‘false
brother’, which, translated, yielded a script for the internal enemy,
the political traitor and adversary in civil wars. Around this figure
enormous fantasies crystallized themselves, arguably without
equivalent in non-monotheistic cultures. One sees in the late
medieval French civil wars the semi-secularized mobilization of
this figure, with fantasies and execution of violent purge. (3) The
ascetic values activated for warfare with the First Crusade meant
that while in reality (as one would expect) sexual did
transgressions occur, rape in war by one’s own side was hardly
ever admitted, and arguably was in reality also inhibited.
A shorter French version constitutes the postface to the French translation of Holy War, Martyrdom, and Terror, published as Guerre Sainte by Gallimard (Paris, 2017)
Coming out in the "Magazin" this fall
The blurb is as usual both simplistic and hyperbolic, and makes it seem as if I talk about simple causality.
http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/1863
Another discussion by Jonathan Benthall in the TLS
http://www.the-tls.co.uk/tls/public/article1645672.ece
A fantastistically cantakerous review is by Christopher Tyerman in the EHR of June 2016
http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/content/131/550/623.extract
-- such a spanking is vintage English public school ;-)
p. 251 - 253
(while old, a bit of historiography, useful for a "state of the field")