Musculus biceps femoris
Appearance
Musculus biceps femoris |
---|
M. biceps femoris (rubre), pars lateralis musculorum ischiocruralium, articulos duos superat. |
Origo |
Caput longum: Tuber ischiadicum ossis ischii Caput breve: Os femoris |
Insertio |
Caput fibulae |
Nervus |
Nervus fibularis communis |
Musculus biceps femoris (TA: A04.7.02.032)[1] est musculus sceletalis membri inferii. Invenitur musculus in latere postico femoris.
Anatomia macroscopica
[recensere | fontem recensere]Ut musculi nomen indicat, ex partibus duabus compositus est: capite longo et capite brevi. Origo musculi tendo singularis una cum tendine musculi semimembranosi tubere ischiadico[2], insertio fibula est[3].
Varietates insertionis descriptae sunt[4].
Anatomia topographica
[recensere | fontem recensere]Musculus biceps femoris, una cum musculo semimembranoso et musculo semitendinoso musculis ischiocruralibus attributus, in loco postico femoris et superficale situs est. Musculis semimembranoso et semitendinoso lateraliter locatus est.
Mala
[recensere | fontem recensere]Rupturae musculi diversibus artibus athleticis notae sunt: narta nautica[5].
Notae
[recensere | fontem recensere]- ↑ Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology (1998). Terminologia Anatomica. Stuttgardiae: Thieme
- ↑ Sato K., Nimura A., Yamaguchi K., Akita K. (Sep 2012). "Anatomical study of the proximal origin of hamstring muscles". Journal of orthopaedic sciences 17 (5): 614-8
- ↑ Tubbs R. S., Caycedo F. J., Oakes W. J., Salter E. G. (Sep 2006). "Descriptive anatomy of the insertion of the biceps femoris muscle". Clinical anatomy 19 (6): 517-21
- ↑ Malalagama G. N., Solomon L. B., Loftus W. K. (Iun 2020). "Complete tibial insertion of the biceps femoris tendon: an MRI-based study to assess the prevalence of this variant". Surgical and radiological anatomy 42 (6): 661-5
- ↑ Chakravarthy J., Ramisetty N., Pimpalnerkar A., Mohtadi N. (Aug 2005). "Surgical repair of complete proximal hamstring tendon ruptures in water skiers and bull riders: a report of four cases and review of the literature". British journal of sports medicine 39 (8): 569-72