Scott D Haddow
Bioarchaeologist with a focus on mortuary practices in the Near East.
less
Related Authors
Andrea Zeeb-Lanz
Generaldirektion Kulturelles Erbe Rheinland-Pfalz
Fusun Ozer
Hacettepe University
Necmi Karul
Istanbul University
Elissavet Ganiatsou
Democritus University of Thrace
Marietta Csányi
Eötvös Loránd University
Reyhan Yaka
Middle East Technical University
Serena Aneli
Università degli Studi di Torino
Inna Potekhina
Institute of Archaeology of Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences
InterestsView All (24)
Uploads
Papers by Scott D Haddow
… Read more
Neolithic and Beaker period activity. An assemblage of Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age ceramics was recovered from the interior of the fort in association with rock-cut pits testifying to
occupation of the hilltop prior to the construction of the hillfort rampart. The hillfort rampart
construction took place in the period 435–390 cal. BC (68% probability) and was destroyed before its completion, probably by the mid-fourth century cal. BC, when large numbers of women and children were disposed of in the ditch together with the demolition material from the fort’s wall. The defensive character of the monument and the evidence for a violent end to the site appear to indicate, on current evidence, that the fort was sacked.
excavation in 3D, using different technologies such as laser scanning, computer vision, and photogrammetry.
The end goal was to make the excavation process virtually reversible in a simulated environment from laptop computers to
480
THEME 6
virtual immersive systems. Since the beginning, when the 3D recording project was initiated, the Çatalhöyük GIS geodatabase
has been used as the main repository and display space for the Computer Vision (CV) data captured on site. During the
course of excavations, georeferenced CV and laser scanning models are imported to the GIS geodatabase and integrated
with other spatially related data, equally stored and arranged in the geodatabase. The ability of GIS of integrating, displaying
and analyzing diverse data sets within a single environment makes them an ideal tool for facilitating archaeological
interpretation and the optimal place for 3D data to be used in the interpretation process. 3D interaction and visualization
allow very detailed analyses of all the stratigraphic relations in the 3D space and a more advanced reconstruction of all the
archaeological excavations. In short, all the process can raise new research questions.
… Read more
Neolithic and Beaker period activity. An assemblage of Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age ceramics was recovered from the interior of the fort in association with rock-cut pits testifying to
occupation of the hilltop prior to the construction of the hillfort rampart. The hillfort rampart
construction took place in the period 435–390 cal. BC (68% probability) and was destroyed before its completion, probably by the mid-fourth century cal. BC, when large numbers of women and children were disposed of in the ditch together with the demolition material from the fort’s wall. The defensive character of the monument and the evidence for a violent end to the site appear to indicate, on current evidence, that the fort was sacked.
excavation in 3D, using different technologies such as laser scanning, computer vision, and photogrammetry.
The end goal was to make the excavation process virtually reversible in a simulated environment from laptop computers to
480
THEME 6
virtual immersive systems. Since the beginning, when the 3D recording project was initiated, the Çatalhöyük GIS geodatabase
has been used as the main repository and display space for the Computer Vision (CV) data captured on site. During the
course of excavations, georeferenced CV and laser scanning models are imported to the GIS geodatabase and integrated
with other spatially related data, equally stored and arranged in the geodatabase. The ability of GIS of integrating, displaying
and analyzing diverse data sets within a single environment makes them an ideal tool for facilitating archaeological
interpretation and the optimal place for 3D data to be used in the interpretation process. 3D interaction and visualization
allow very detailed analyses of all the stratigraphic relations in the 3D space and a more advanced reconstruction of all the
archaeological excavations. In short, all the process can raise new research questions.
Given these critiques, archaeologists and anthropologists must rethink how social inequality should be identified and approached by considering the specific circumstances and conditions under which fluid and flexible forms of hierarchy may emerge and how they may have become more permanent and lasting. The transition to agriculture in Southwest Asia and its arrival in Europe is still seen as a key moment that may have engendered the establishment of more permanent and strict social hierarchies. There is now increasing evidence, however, that various forms of social difference may have existed well before the emergence of fully sedentary agropastoralist societies.
This session invites papers focusing on a wide spectrum of material correlates associated with social inequality in the archaeological record between the Late Upper Paleolithic and Early Bronze Age such as funerary practices, resource abundance, demography, settlement patterns etc.
This experimental appending of stratigraphic temporal data onto the spatial data is an unusual and innovative way to articulate space in time. Through the study and analysis of the material culture in relation to its spatiotemporal context we hope to gain some insight into the social identity of the building’s residents throughout the life cycle of the structure. We use spatiotemporal animations to present the results of this collaborative study as a type of ‘visual biography’, more dynamic and nuanced than conventional phasing, that might be used to underpin and illustrate a social narrative of the building.