Hate to butt-in.
Like we all know: Everyone has their unique perspective and opinions. Our whole life experience gives us a way of looking at the world that is different to all the others. We cannot be arrogant and assume our perspective is truth.
What is true is what is consistent across multiple perspectives.
Hazime makes some valid points. You need to entertain some thoughts which may go against your values/beliefs, but his beliefs are quite common and rooted in evolution and utilitarian morality. Terribly bleak, but nonetheless consistent enough that it has truth to it.
My unique experience, besides learning about evolution and utilitarianism, is also psychoanalysis. This is not the first time the writer has a negative association with "parents". Chase, in the beginning of Echo, has a bad relationship with his parents. So does Leo. So does Jenna. So does Carl. My gut is telling me they associate parents, even the cosmic ones, as something negative. They may have had a bad childhood growing up in order to form such an association. But I caught onto it.
That's why I think Hazime is onto something and shouldn't be dismissed so easily. It is understandable that you have your version of reality, but others have theirs too. No ones is 100% correct. You have to give them just a little credit and also be willing to try on new perspectives to see their points. Its uncomfortable putting down your version of reality, even if it is just for a moment, but I promise you it wont harm you in the least. If anything, it broadens your horizons and you may learn something new.
I get what you mean, like i said everyone has their own interpretation of something, but there truly are times when what someone says is just plain wrong
The examples i used:
Jelloapocalypse's video about Adventure Time is horrible because he really gets the show wrong, saying stuff like "the arcs go nowhere and the characters don't grow as people"(said "arcs" are either from one off episodes about the side characters to show they have lives too and are not about introducing any new major side characters, or arcs that don't have conclusions yet because the show was literally still ongoing when the video was made), some of his critisims are understandable(like what he said about Breezy) but the thing is: a lot of them stop being valid after season 2, and sometimes he says stuff that makes it look like he either didn't watch the entire show and just read a summary of the rest online or didn't pay attention to it, like criticising that the Lich was imprisoned in amber for 5 seasons when in reality it was only for 2, he's disingenuous and unusually mean spirited during the video, for some reason he thought it was a good idea to say that the entire crew of the show are brainless idiots(except Rebecca Sugar, for some reason he puts her as the only good one).
And Lily Orchard's video about Pokémon is worse, she refuses to engage with anything, mashes the "A" button trough the dialogue and it seems like she just wants to get to the end as fast as possible, her critisisms are bs, she complains about having to read, that the games try to tell a story and that the games are challenging(and why wouldn't they be, she hacks the games from gen 3 onwards to switch the starter for a Ralts and Ralts has weaker stats than the starters) and her takes on gen 5 are the worse, she loathes N just because he makes her read, mischaracterizes him and even sides with Ghetsis(N's abuser) at one point.
I don't think i need to say why that take on The Owl House is bad.
(Anyway, i don't care about this disscusion anymore, im tired and i didn't saw the notif to your reply unltil today)
