This paper investigates the ethics of character engineering in artificial superintelligence (ASI)... more This paper investigates the ethics of character engineering in artificial superintelligence (ASI), focusing on implications for AI governance and policy. We examine the evolution of AI alignment efforts, from harm avoidance to positive trait cultivation, and analyze current character training techniques. The study addresses key ethical challenges, including the value loading problem, cultural bias, and the transparency-performance trade-off in ASI design. We evaluate potential societal impacts, considering the influence on human-AI interaction norms and existential risk considerations. The paper proposes ethical guidelines for ASI character engineering, emphasizing beneficence, transparency, and diversity. We discuss the role of global cooperation in addressing these challenges, drawing parallels with emerging national AI ecosystems. The study concludes by outlining critical areas for future research and policy development, underscoring the need for proactive ethical framework creation in ASI design to ensure responsible innovation and global stability.
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence poses significant challenges for ensuring that A... more The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence poses significant challenges for ensuring that AI systems remain aligned with human values and societal goals. This paper explores the ethical and societal implications of AI alignment, particularly as systems become more powerful and potentially capable of emergent behaviors. We examine the difficulties in specifying human values and preferences, the potential for unintended consequences, and the importance of diverse representation in setting alignment goals. The paper presents a comprehensive overview of current alignment strategies and their limitations, followed by an analysis of promising new approaches. We argue that addressing AI alignment is not merely a technical challenge but a crucial societal imperative that requires multi-stakeholder engagement and careful consideration of long-term impacts on humanity. Keywords Artificial Super-intelligence • AI Safety • AI Alignment * The researchers are integrating state of the art LLM's into their daily workflow, including paper preparation and revision. They're also working towards developing autonomous AI Agents that conduct independent AI research.
This paper conducts a comprehensive risk assessment of OpenAI's proposed five-level framework for... more This paper conducts a comprehensive risk assessment of OpenAI's proposed five-level framework for AGI development. We systematically analyze potential failure modes, unintended consequences, and existential risks associated with each level of AI capability. Particular attention is given to the transition points between levels, which we argue represent periods of heightened vulnerability and unpredictability. The research highlights critical safety concerns often overlooked in capability-focused frameworks, including the potential for deceptive or misaligned AI systems. We propose a parallel "safety level" system to complement OpenAI's capability levels, emphasizing the need for commensurate advances in AI alignment, interpretability, and robustness. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for policymakers and AI developers to mitigate risks at each stage of AGI progression.
This research paper proposes a comprehensive model for a Ministry of Artificial Intelligence to a... more This research paper proposes a comprehensive model for a Ministry of Artificial Intelligence to address the challenges of the impending era of artificial superintelligence. The ministry is envisioned as a nexus for academia, industry, and government collaboration, promoting innovation, ensuring ethical oversight, and facilitating global cooperation. Key concepts include "AI diplomacy," an "AI Commons," and an AI Security Council for international coordination. The model introduces strategies like the "AI Transition Fund" and "AI-Human Complementarity" programs to address job displacement, and proposes "AI impact assessments" and explainable AI mandates for ethical development. It addresses the balance between national interests and global cooperation, and examines concerns about centralized AI governance. While arguing that such ministries can enhance nations' abilities to harness AI benefits while mitigating risks, the paper also critically examines potential obstacles, particularly in diverse political contexts. This model serves as an adaptable blueprint for responsible AI governance in the impending age of superintelligence.
This paper investigates the ethics of character engineering in artificial superintelligence (ASI)... more This paper investigates the ethics of character engineering in artificial superintelligence (ASI), focusing on implications for AI governance and policy. We examine the evolution of AI alignment efforts, from harm avoidance to positive trait cultivation, and analyze current character training techniques. The study addresses key ethical challenges, including the value loading problem, cultural bias, and the transparency-performance trade-off in ASI design. We evaluate potential societal impacts, considering the influence on human-AI interaction norms and existential risk considerations. The paper proposes ethical guidelines for ASI character engineering, emphasizing beneficence, transparency, and diversity. We discuss the role of global cooperation in addressing these challenges, drawing parallels with emerging national AI ecosystems. The study concludes by outlining critical areas for future research and policy development, underscoring the need for proactive ethical framework creation in ASI design to ensure responsible innovation and global stability.
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence poses significant challenges for ensuring that A... more The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence poses significant challenges for ensuring that AI systems remain aligned with human values and societal goals. This paper explores the ethical and societal implications of AI alignment, particularly as systems become more powerful and potentially capable of emergent behaviors. We examine the difficulties in specifying human values and preferences, the potential for unintended consequences, and the importance of diverse representation in setting alignment goals. The paper presents a comprehensive overview of current alignment strategies and their limitations, followed by an analysis of promising new approaches. We argue that addressing AI alignment is not merely a technical challenge but a crucial societal imperative that requires multi-stakeholder engagement and careful consideration of long-term impacts on humanity. Keywords Artificial Super-intelligence • AI Safety • AI Alignment * The researchers are integrating state of the art LLM's into their daily workflow, including paper preparation and revision. They're also working towards developing autonomous AI Agents that conduct independent AI research.
This paper conducts a comprehensive risk assessment of OpenAI's proposed five-level framework for... more This paper conducts a comprehensive risk assessment of OpenAI's proposed five-level framework for AGI development. We systematically analyze potential failure modes, unintended consequences, and existential risks associated with each level of AI capability. Particular attention is given to the transition points between levels, which we argue represent periods of heightened vulnerability and unpredictability. The research highlights critical safety concerns often overlooked in capability-focused frameworks, including the potential for deceptive or misaligned AI systems. We propose a parallel "safety level" system to complement OpenAI's capability levels, emphasizing the need for commensurate advances in AI alignment, interpretability, and robustness. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for policymakers and AI developers to mitigate risks at each stage of AGI progression.
This research paper proposes a comprehensive model for a Ministry of Artificial Intelligence to a... more This research paper proposes a comprehensive model for a Ministry of Artificial Intelligence to address the challenges of the impending era of artificial superintelligence. The ministry is envisioned as a nexus for academia, industry, and government collaboration, promoting innovation, ensuring ethical oversight, and facilitating global cooperation. Key concepts include "AI diplomacy," an "AI Commons," and an AI Security Council for international coordination. The model introduces strategies like the "AI Transition Fund" and "AI-Human Complementarity" programs to address job displacement, and proposes "AI impact assessments" and explainable AI mandates for ethical development. It addresses the balance between national interests and global cooperation, and examines concerns about centralized AI governance. While arguing that such ministries can enhance nations' abilities to harness AI benefits while mitigating risks, the paper also critically examines potential obstacles, particularly in diverse political contexts. This model serves as an adaptable blueprint for responsible AI governance in the impending age of superintelligence.
Uploads
Papers by Diana Ruiz