Robin Harper
Related Authors
Josiah Heyman
University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP)
Speranta Dumitru
Université Paris Cité
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Nando Sigona
University of Birmingham
Eduardo Domenech
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Peter Nyers
McMaster University
Ana Rita Gil, PhD
Universidade de Lisboa
Shahram Khosravi
Stockholm University
Jana Javornik
University of East London
Gwen Robbins Schug
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Uploads
Papers by Robin Harper
conventions, are one of the few daily repeated political theatre
experiences, replete with monologs, dialogues, costumes, props,
actors, stage managers, plural audiences, and staged practices.
They serve as a public ritual to render foreigners into members. In
so doing, they generate a citizen identity, reinforce the power of
the state and confirm a relationship between new citizens, current
citizens, and the state. In this article, through an interpretive
process including participant-observation and grounded theory
approaches, I question the presence, interaction, and roles of the
multiple publics (immigrants, observers, civil servants, judges and
non-governmental groups) in a naturalization ceremony. I present
field notes and reflections from a ‘typical’ US naturalization
ceremony. I deconstruct the choreography and structure of the
public ritual to show what the public performance of
naturalization tells us about what it means to be an American
citizen. I explore what messages the state is trying to convey to
naturalizing immigrants (and others) through the ritual of the
naturalization ceremony. The locus of inquiry is New York City
where 70,000 of the 680,000 naturalizations take place every year.
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, is often described as 'the day that changed everything.' But what really changed and what was a temporal expression? Is there something to be learned about space and the transformation of space and the relationship between people and their use of space in the period following the 9/11 events? What does it tell us about how people seek order in times of crisis? What does it tell us about privacy and the plastic nature of norms of public and private space? What opportunities for democracy and community building presented and were lost? Researchers have spent much time already examining how the event has reeled into the war on terrorism and the proliferation of security efforts as well as the economic repercussions. (Burbach and Clarke, 2002; Warren, 2002; Fainstein, 2002; Light, 2002) However, there has been very little examination of the memorials and the transformation of space in the immediate post-9/11 period, In the moments succeeding the 9/11 events, a political spectacle transpired a reorganization and claiming of public, private and personal space generating distinct political messages. The public attempted to do three things: to claim, to mark and to memorialize. To claim, the public carved space from the common property, their own private property and their own bodies. To mark, each site became a symbol and each symbol was imbued with meaning. To memorialize, symbols generated forced viewers to recall the quintessential moment of loss. I would like to describe some spatial transformation and present some ideas for future analysis as the event takes on historical perspective.
conventions, are one of the few daily repeated political theatre
experiences, replete with monologs, dialogues, costumes, props,
actors, stage managers, plural audiences, and staged practices.
They serve as a public ritual to render foreigners into members. In
so doing, they generate a citizen identity, reinforce the power of
the state and confirm a relationship between new citizens, current
citizens, and the state. In this article, through an interpretive
process including participant-observation and grounded theory
approaches, I question the presence, interaction, and roles of the
multiple publics (immigrants, observers, civil servants, judges and
non-governmental groups) in a naturalization ceremony. I present
field notes and reflections from a ‘typical’ US naturalization
ceremony. I deconstruct the choreography and structure of the
public ritual to show what the public performance of
naturalization tells us about what it means to be an American
citizen. I explore what messages the state is trying to convey to
naturalizing immigrants (and others) through the ritual of the
naturalization ceremony. The locus of inquiry is New York City
where 70,000 of the 680,000 naturalizations take place every year.
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, is often described as 'the day that changed everything.' But what really changed and what was a temporal expression? Is there something to be learned about space and the transformation of space and the relationship between people and their use of space in the period following the 9/11 events? What does it tell us about how people seek order in times of crisis? What does it tell us about privacy and the plastic nature of norms of public and private space? What opportunities for democracy and community building presented and were lost? Researchers have spent much time already examining how the event has reeled into the war on terrorism and the proliferation of security efforts as well as the economic repercussions. (Burbach and Clarke, 2002; Warren, 2002; Fainstein, 2002; Light, 2002) However, there has been very little examination of the memorials and the transformation of space in the immediate post-9/11 period, In the moments succeeding the 9/11 events, a political spectacle transpired a reorganization and claiming of public, private and personal space generating distinct political messages. The public attempted to do three things: to claim, to mark and to memorialize. To claim, the public carved space from the common property, their own private property and their own bodies. To mark, each site became a symbol and each symbol was imbued with meaning. To memorialize, symbols generated forced viewers to recall the quintessential moment of loss. I would like to describe some spatial transformation and present some ideas for future analysis as the event takes on historical perspective.