
Fiona Jones
Related Authors
Eric S . Kim (UBC)
University of British Columbia
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Omar-fauzee Mohd Sofian
UPM - Universiti Putra Malaysia
ASKIN KESER
Uludag University
Eric Mayor
University of Basel
Daniel Courgeau
Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques
tim anstiss
University of Reading
Maria Sironi
University of Padova
John Christopher Examen
Chinese General Hospital Colleges
Gustavo Duque
McGill University
Uploads
Papers by Fiona Jones
cultural norms; being busy at work effecting time and health behaviours being used as coping responses on health behaviours and is primarily detrimental.
Design. Participants completed a questionnaire measuring the components of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the job strain model. A follow-up questionnaire a week later measured behaviour.
Method. The questionnaires were completed by e-mail. The initial questionnaire was completed by 331 employees, and 286 follow-up questionnaires were returned.
Results. Job demands affected exercise indirectly by lowering perceptions of behavioural control over exercise. However, variables from the job strain model were not related to exercise intentions or behaviour. In contrast, employees in passive jobs intended to eat more sweets and snack foods and employees in low strain jobs were more likely to realize their intentions to eat more sweets and snack foods. However, variables from the job strain model did not influence consumption of fruit and vegetables.
Conclusions. While people may consider the impact of job strain on exercise whilst making decisions about whether or not to exercise, job strain has a more direct impact on healthy eating. However, job strain may only affect consumption of so-called ‘high density’ foods, rather than foods such as fruit and vegetables.
cultural norms; being busy at work effecting time and health behaviours being used as coping responses on health behaviours and is primarily detrimental.
Design. Participants completed a questionnaire measuring the components of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the job strain model. A follow-up questionnaire a week later measured behaviour.
Method. The questionnaires were completed by e-mail. The initial questionnaire was completed by 331 employees, and 286 follow-up questionnaires were returned.
Results. Job demands affected exercise indirectly by lowering perceptions of behavioural control over exercise. However, variables from the job strain model were not related to exercise intentions or behaviour. In contrast, employees in passive jobs intended to eat more sweets and snack foods and employees in low strain jobs were more likely to realize their intentions to eat more sweets and snack foods. However, variables from the job strain model did not influence consumption of fruit and vegetables.
Conclusions. While people may consider the impact of job strain on exercise whilst making decisions about whether or not to exercise, job strain has a more direct impact on healthy eating. However, job strain may only affect consumption of so-called ‘high density’ foods, rather than foods such as fruit and vegetables.