
Asuman Oktac
Related Authors
Myriam Codes Valcarce
University of Salamanca
Tamara Díaz Chang
Universidad Austral de Chile
Hernan Franco Gonzales Barreda
University of Cauca
ROSA ELVIRA PAEZ MURILLO
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México
Sergio Jato Canales
Universidad Isa
Leticia Sosa
Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas
Uploads
Papers by Asuman Oktac
We developed our theory and methodology along with our study of data from interviews with 14 students who achieved high grades in a first linear algebra and some of whom obtained high grades also in a second linear algebra course. We also studied the final examination questions in these courses from the point of view of the level of theoretical thinking that was, in principle, needed to obtain full marks.
The report has five chapters and is preceded by an introduction, where the research question is formulated and put in context.
In Chapter I we describe our model of theoretical thinking. We argue that practical and theoretical thinking are deeply intertwined in the development of scientific knowledge, and we posit that theoretical thinking develops against practical thinking, which thereby also constitutes a condition for the existence and significance of theoretical thinking. We then justify why we think that theoretical thinking is necessary for understanding linear algebra. The chapter concludes with a summary of the postulated features of theoretical thinking. We name the main categories of these features "reflective", "systemic" and "analytic" thinking.
In Chapter II we present our interviews with a group of 14 students who were selected for having achieved high grades in a section of a first linear algebra course (they were all taught by the same instructor). Six of these students achieved high grades also in a second linear algebra course. We explain our design of the seven interview questions and our method of coding students' responses: the code [1, 0] is used to represent theoretical behavior, [0, 1] represents practical behavior and [1, 1] represents a mixture of theoretical and practical behavior. Six questions in the interview had mathematical content and the seventh question was meant to incite the students to reveal their beliefs about, among others, truth, mathematical knowledge, and reasons for taking mathematics courses.
In describing students' behavior in each question we explain how we related this behavior with our model of theoretical thinking. This leads us to an operationalization of the model in terms of features of students' behavior; we identify 18 "theoretical behavior" features
In Chapter III we present the contents of the linear algebra courses taken by the interviewed students and we analyze in detail the final examinations given in these courses. We look at the examination questions from the point of view of the relevance of theoretical thinking in their solution. We point to ways of reformulating the questions so that theoretical thinking becomes more relevant in their solution.
Chapter IV contains a quantitative evaluation of the students' theoretical behavior. We treat the numerical coding introduced in Chapter II as scores and we define three categories of statistical indices as functions of these scores: expectation, tendency and capability, which we apply to the group as a whole (group indices) and to individual students (individual indices). We use these indices to examine the relations between the students' disposition in the sense of expectation, tendency and capability, and their grades in the courses. We also apply the group indices to dress a profile of theoretical thinking strengths and weaknesses in the whole group of students, compared with the profile of the subgroup of students who achieved high grades in both courses. These profiles are formulated in terms of rankings of the 18 theoretical behavior features according to the indices of expectation, tendency and capability. We conclude with a comparison of the students' disposition to theoretical thinking and the relevance of this kind of thinking in solving the examination questions.
In Chapter V we formulate some more general conclusions from the study and, looking back at our research methodology, we reflect on the empirical value of our findings.
The report closes with some remarks on the theme of the idea of a university. We propose that the development of theoretical thinking is an important part of the mission of the university and that there is much room for improvement in mathematics courses in contributing to fulfill this mission.