Muhammad Ansor
Muhammad Ansor is a lecturer of Islamic political science at IAIN Langsa, Aceh. He earned his bachelor (2001) from the STAIN (IAIN) Salatiga, master (2004) and doctor (2019) from UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta . His research interests include Islam and politics, gender and Islam, women and interfaith relations, and Islamic movements. His articles appeared in several peer-reviewed journals including: Post-Islamism and the Remaking of Islamic Public Sphere in Post-reform Indonesia, Journal Studia Islamika, Volume 23, No 3, 2016; Being Woman in The Land of Shari’a: Politics of the Female Body, Piety and Resistance in Langsa Aceh, Journal Aljamiah, Volume 52, No 1, 2014.
Address: IAIN Langsa, Jl. Meurandeh, Kota Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia
Address: IAIN Langsa, Jl. Meurandeh, Kota Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia
less
Related Authors
Noel B. Salazar
KU Leuven
Edith Szanto
University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa
Armando Salvatore
McGill University
Martin van Bruinessen
Universiteit Utrecht
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Adis Duderija
Griffith University
Moch Nur Ichwan
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Najib Burhani
University of California, Santa Barbara
Amanda J. Lucia
University of California, Riverside
Carole Cusack
The University of Sydney
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Muhammad Ansor
This article is comparing the strategy and arguments used by the three Islam-based parties—PPP, PBB, and PKS—in the parliament of Indonesia when they respond the discourse of applying Islamic Syarî‘ah in Indonesia. They share opinion that the application of Islamic Syarî‘ah through state is a duty of every Muslim, but they differ one another in the way or strategy of realizing and making that come true. Different from PPP and PBB that struggle for adopting the Jakarta Carter into Indonesian 1945 Constitution, PKS (with PAN) suggest adopting Medina Carter. When the majority of parliament members refuses both suggestions, the three parties also take different ways responding the refusal. While PPP can understand the refusal and explicitly agree to no-amendment on the article 29 of Indonesian 1945 Constitution, PBB and PKS declare to be abstains.
The controversy indicates the difficulty of unifying Muslim opinion and strategy relating to the how to position Islam in the context of state. The phenomena that occurs between the supporting and the refusing group is not only in terms of positivization of Islamic Syarî‘ah, but also in applying Islam. It ranges from the issues of struggle strategy to the decision of aspects of Syarî‘ah that can be adopted in or made positive law.